Select the correct answer.
According to routine activity theory, which is a possible reason for internet fraud?
O A. increasingly motivated offenders
OB. easily available suitable targets
O C. lack of capable guardians
OD. people with no internet access
Answer:
Im not sure if this is right but i thnk its (B) Available Suitable Targets
Explanation:
IF ANOTHER DRIVER "CUTS" IN FRONT OF YOU, IT WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU:
A. Take your foot off the gas
B. Brake suddenly
C. Accelerate to avoid being cut off
B. Brake suddenly
I think its the answer, otherwise we'll crash
Brake suddenly is the better way, if another driver cuts in front of the person, as it stop the chances of accident.
What are the major reason of accident on road?Excessive speeding, reckless driving, breaking the law, failing to read the signs, being tired, and drinking. Pedestrian: Ignorance, errant crossing, moving on the carriageway, jaywalkers, and carelessness.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about major reason of accident on road, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15113880
#SPJ2
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
if i failed three quarters can i still pass if i do well in the last quarter?
Reflect on your research. Share one example of a breach in patient confidentiality.
Answer:
would it just be if you share a a patient's visit to a 3rd party?
if not I'd be happy to help if I could get a better explanation!
What would happen if you do not obey the law and then not obey a SWAT officer
Disobeying a law order of a police officer carries higher penalties to those who refuse to follow orders lawfully issued by an officer of the law. It’s a second-degree misdemeanor, meaning its punishable by up to 60 days in jail, six months of probation and/ or a $500 fine.
Explanation:
John Hit Mark after the two argued about a parking space. The District Attomey's office prosecuted Antonio on assault charges. Subsequently, Mark filed a lawsuit against Antonio for money damages. Classify each legal action. O The District Attorney's case was a civil case. Mark's lawsuit was a criminal case. O Both cases are criminalO The District Attorney's case was a criminal case; Mark's lawsuit was a civil case. O Both cases are civil
John Hit Mark after the two argued about a parking space. The District Attorney's office prosecuted Antonio on assault charges. Subsequently, Mark filed a lawsuit against Antonio for money damages. The correct option is A.
The legal actions can be classified as follows:
The District Attorney's case was a criminal case; Mark's lawsuit was a civil case.Both cases are not criminal, and the first case is not a civil case either. However, the first case is a criminal case, and the second case is a civil case. The district attorney’s office prosecuted Antonio on assault charges, which is a criminal case. It is the responsibility of the district attorney's office to initiate legal proceedings against any criminal violations that occur. Therefore, the district attorney's office has taken legal action in this case.Mark filed a lawsuit against Antonio for money damages. It is known that a lawsuit is a civil action. Civil lawsuits are instituted by individuals to resolve personal issues with others who have infringed on their rights or caused them harm. Damages can be awarded in a civil lawsuit if there is proof of injury or loss to the plaintiff.The District Attorney's case was a criminal case; Mark's lawsuit was a civil case.Learn more about lawsuit: https://brainly.com/question/1065754
#SPJ11
Is restorative justice more effective than adversarial justice?
Restorative justice conferencing and victim-offender mediation programs are included. Findings indicate that restorative programs are a significantly more effective method than more traditional criminal justice responses across all four outcomes. ... and 93% of victims reported satisfaction with the outcome.
Sorce of info: Goo_gle
ow did william jennings bryan react to president wilson's threat to break diplomatic relations with germany
William Jennings Bryan resigned as Secretary of State due to his disagreement with President Wilson's threat to break diplomatic relations with Germany.
John Jennings Bryan responded to President Wilson's threat to sever diplomatic ties with Germany during World War I because of his reputation as a pacifist. Bryan disagreed with Wilson's strategy and thought that diplomatic talks should be pursued rather than war or severing ties. Instead of a means to a peaceful conclusion, he saw the threat as a step towards a potential conflict.
Bryan felt that his role as Secretary of State was no longer compatible with the administration's rising tensions with Germany because of his commitment to his principles. As a result, he resigned from his position in June 1915, standing up for his pacifist principles and expressing his opposition to President Wilson's confrontational approach.
Learn more about William Jennings Bryan at:
brainly.com/question/2483021
#SPJ4
The complete question is "How did william jennings bryan react to president wilson's threat to break diplomatic relations with germany?"
ali murdered abu because of jealousy. state the court in Malaysia that is suitable to hear each the case and give your reason.
In the given hypothetical scenario, the High Court of Malaysia will have jurisdiction over the murder of Abu by Ali.
Why will the High Court have Jurisdiction?The Sessions Court would normally have jurisdiction over a murder case involving a single victim and no special aggravating factors. The Sessions Court hears criminal proceedings, including those punished by imprisonment for a duration of no more than 14 years, a fine, or both.
If, on the other hand, the murder case contains several victims, complicated circumstances, or other aggravating factors, it may be regarded a more serious offense, and the High Court will almost certainly have jurisdiction. Because murder involves a sentence of more than 14 years in prison and is a serious offense, the case will be heard at the high court.
Learn more about High Court here: https://brainly.com/question/32989005
#SPJ1
Law is a practical discipline discipline ;theory has no place in law. With specific references to the law of contract discuss
ANSWER:
Law is a practical discipline because it is a discipline that guilds ones action, and define the rules one have to observe in taking an action
Contract law is the law that binds an agreement between two parties with a mutual intension. This law enforces what each party have to offer to the other, and what the penalty will be if one should offend the agreement.
These law can be use to describe law to be practical because the agreement which the law enforces, are their actions toward each other. These actions are described as the conducts which is abide by the contract enforced by the law.
Example; Mr Obi and Mr Michael signed an agreement to exchange their smart phone with each other. But also agreed that anyone who's smart phone is faulty when exchanged, will pay a fine and return back the phone he collected.
The law that enforces this agreement in the example above is called a contract law. This is a practical example of law, because it is law that abides their actions in the exchange of phone and passing out penalty.
households (c)
government (g)
formation(I)
residual item
name the method used
Answer:
Expenditure approach to calculate GDP.
Explanation:
The terms represent the components of the expenditure approach used in calculating a country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
The expenditure approach sums up the total amount spent on goods and services produced within the country during a given period, typically a year.
The components of GDP using the expenditure approach are:
Consumption (C): the total spending by households on goods and services during the period.
Government spending (G): the total spending by the government on goods and services during the period.
Investment (I): the total spending on new capital equipment, buildings, and inventory by firms during the period.
Net Exports (NX): the difference between the value of exports and imports during the period.
The residual item in the expenditure approach is the difference between the total output (GDP) and the sum of the three components (C + G + I), which represents the net exports (NX).
So, the method used is the Expenditure approach to calculate GDP.
Having to do all the work is an example of a(n)
A. disadvantage to society of using authority
B. disadvantage to the user of using authority
C. advantage to society of using authority
D. advantage to the user of using authority
Answer:
A
Explanation:
, Studio GFF hid your b ok gift but no you don't need to
Define the elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment and explain what they mean.
Determine why the founding fathers included a provision in the Bill of Rights pertaining to search and seizure.
Consider DUI checkpoints. Should DUI checkpoints be legal given the provisions of search and seizure as defined by the Bill of Rights?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The elements of this amendment are:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effectsAgainst unreasonable searches and seizuresShall not be violatedWarrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The founding fathers included this provision in the Bill of Rights because they believed that individual liberties, including privacy, were important and needed protection from the government.
Regarding DUI checkpoints, the legality of these checkpoints is a matter of debate and has been challenged in court. The Supreme Court has ruled that DUI checkpoints are constitutional as long as they are reasonable and minimally intrusive. However, this is a complex issue and the specific circumstances of each checkpoint must be evaluated to determine whether it violates the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Example:
Let's consider the following example to understand the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Imagine that a police officer suspects that a particular person is involved in drug trafficking. The officer wants to search the person's house for evidence. However, without a warrant, the search would be considered an unreasonable one and would violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
To obtain a warrant, the officer must show probable cause that the person is involved in criminal activity and that evidence of that activity can be found in the person's house. The warrant must also describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized. In this case, the warrant would specify the address of the person's house and the items the officer is looking for, such as drugs, drug paraphernalia, or money related to drug sales.
If the warrant is properly obtained, the search is considered reasonable and the evidence found can be used in court. However, if the warrant is not based on probable cause or does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, the evidence found during the search may be considered inadmissible in court.
In the context of DUI checkpoints, a similar analysis would be performed to determine whether the checkpoint is reasonable and minimally intrusive, and whether it meets the Fourth Amendment's requirements. The specific circumstances, such as the location, time, and duration of the checkpoint, would be considered to determine if the checkpoint is reasonable and does not violate an individual's constitutional rights.
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. If you have any additional questions, please let me know or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
Elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment relate to the protection of individuals from oppressive government searches and seizures. The founding fathers included a clause in the Bill of Rights on this subject for the protection of citizens and for the protection of the inherent freedoms of man.
What are the freedoms of law?It corresponds to a series of characteristics arranged in the universal declaration of rights that aims to protect man and his rights to social and civil freedom, that is, the possibility of not being oppressed, violated or suffering any threat to his integrity.
Therefore, the US Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, DUI verification being legal and determined by its reasonableness and examination of the circumstances.
Find out more about Search and Seizure on:
https://brainly.com/question/30280195
#SPJ1
"When you create acronyms, songs, or visual images to help you remember course material, you are using"
What is another name for the first day of winter
Answer:
winter solstice that's all I have
Explanation:
enough
Answer:
Winter solstice
Explanation:
This astronomical event appears on calendars as the first day of winter—but meteorologists have already gotten a head start on the season.
The emphasis on rehabilitation in our criminal justice system has produced substantially lower rates of recidivism. T or F.
True.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
does anyone know who is ronaldo the judge is asking
Answer: #\(Game On\)
Explanation:
Cristiano Ronaldo
Which of the following is an advantage of being a sole trader?
Select one:
a. the owner has unlimited liability
b. the business has limited life
c. the owner has total autonomy over business decisions
d. the business is not a separate legal entity
Which term refers to the amount of output compared to the input needed to create it? Apex
Answer:
Productivity
Explanation:
I just did it
Answer:
Productivity
Explanation:
A.P.E.X.
Why is the forensic interview especially important in child abuse cases? What are key tips to ensure facts gathered in the interview can withstand judicial scrutiny and why are all forensic interviews with children recorded?
Forensic interviews are especially important in child abuse cases because it enable the acquisition of factual information and evidence relating to those cases.
To ensure that facts are gathered in a way that can be proven in court, forensic interviews are carefully controlled: the interviewer's utterances and body language must be neutral, alternative explanations for a child's assertions are thoroughly explored, and the results of the interview are substantiated in a way that can be proven in court.
What is the importance of Forensic interviews?The purpose of a forensic interview is to get a statement from a kid in a way that is objective, developmental, and legally acceptable.
Child welfare officials frequently conduct these interviews in the privacy of their automobiles or vacant classrooms. These "improved" settings, while convenient, may not be perfect.
Because a person's capacity to recall past events is often impacted by his or her environment, best practice in forensic interviewing—even if it occurs "in the field"—entails establishing a neutral, comforting, and child-friendly site prior to the interview.
Learn more about Forensic Interviews:
https://brainly.com/question/15213328
#SPJ1
Keith and Cross were employees of CBS. They told their supervisor, Jacobson, about their idea of forming an independent company to provide video promotion spots. Jacobson was in charge of selecting outside vendors and told them he thought they could get a contract with CBS. An exclusive contract was approved by Jacobson and his supervisor. Keith and Cross agreed to remain until their replacements could be hired. The next day Jacobson asked them to "help him out" because he had helped them and asked for $500 per month. Although distressed and shocked, they agreed because Jacobson could fire them or kill the contract once they left; they felt intimidated and that they had no alternative but to agree. They made three payments and then Jacobson demanded $1,000 per month. When they could not pay, Jacobson raised problems with their work, and the contract was likely to be cancelled. At this point they told CBS about the demands, and Jacobson was fired. A few months later their contract was canceled on the basis of "admitted wrongdoing." Keith and Cross sued for economic duress. Will they be successful? Why or why not.
Keith and Cross may have a valid claim for economic duress. Economic duress occurs when one party uses unlawful economic pressure to force another party into a contract or to modify the terms of an existing contract.
In this case, Jacobson used his position of power to coerce Keith and Cross into paying him money by threatening their jobs and contract with CBS.
Several factors support their claim of economic duress:
1. Jacobson's position of power: As their supervisor, Jacobson had the authority to fire Keith and Cross or terminate their contract with CBS. This created a significant imbalance of power between the parties.
2. Lack of alternatives: Keith and Cross felt they had no choice but to agree to Jacobson's demands due to the potential consequences of losing their jobs or the contract.
3. Coercive demands: Jacobson's initial demand for $500 per month, followed by an increase to $1,000 per month, demonstrates a pattern of increasing pressure on Keith and Cross.
4. Consequences of non-payment: When Keith and Cross could not pay the increased amount, Jacobson raised problems with their work and threatened to cancel their contract.
However, the success of their claim will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the applicable laws in their jurisdiction.
If Keith and Cross can prove that they entered into or modified the contract with Jacobson under duress, they may be successful in their lawsuit and potentially recover damages.
To learn more about consequences, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/3794486
#SPJ11
What is probable cause?
Answer:
reasonable grounds for making a search, pressing a charge
17. Would Will Smith hitting Chris Rock during Oscar's ceremony be a tort or a crime or neither? 18. What is most important number in the statement of cash flows and why? What would you like to see ha
17. Committing physical violence against Chris Rock during the Oscar's ceremony would likely be considered a criminal act, specifically assault and/or battery. In legal terms, a tort refers to a civil wrong that causes harm or loss to an individual, while a crime is an offense that is deemed harmful to society as a whole and is punishable under the law. Since physically hitting Chris Rock would cause harm to him as an individual, it would fall under the category of a crime.
18. The net increase or decrease in cash and cash equivalents is the most significant figure in the statement of cash flows because it provides a comprehensive view of the company's overall change in cash position during the specified accounting period.
This particular number serves as a crucial indicator of the company's liquidity and its capacity to meet financial obligations and invest in future growth.
While the net increase or decrease in cash is of primary importance, other significant figures in the statement of cash flows include the operating cash flow, investing cash flow, and financing cash flow.
These figures offer further insight into the sources and uses of cash, providing a more detailed understanding of the company's financial activities.
Read more about Will Smith hitting Chris Rock
https://brainly.com/question/31863539
#SPJ11
The theory that the threat of nuclear war is enough to prevent an attack is called:
a. Deterrence theory
b. Non-proliferation theory
c. Arms control theory
d. Mutual assured destruction (MAD) theory
The theory that the threat of nuclear war is enough to prevent an attack is called the deterrence theory. Option A.
Deterrence is a strategy used in international relations that is intended to prevent an adversary from taking an action not yet started by creating doubt in the mind of the adversary about the negative consequences of such action.
The threat of nuclear war has been used as a deterrence strategy by several nuclear-armed countries. The concept of deterrence is based on the idea that if a country is under the threat of attack from another country, it will be deterred from attacking if it believes that the consequences of such an attack will be so severe that it is not worth it.
The idea of deterrence is that the prospect of punishment can be more powerful than the actual use of punishment.
Deterrence theory aims to dissuade an adversary from engaging in a particular action by convincing them that the cost of doing so would be too great to justify it.
Hence, the right answer is option A. Deterrence theory.
Read more about Nuclear war at https://brainly.com/question/9969573
#SPJ11
What impact do you believe this will have on suspect identification from police, prosecution, and defense perspective?
Impact that forensic evidence will have on suspect identification from police, prosecution, and defense perspective is that it will help with the data of the criminal and unveil the identity of criminal.
What is Forensic evidence?Forensic evidence is the use of science in the domain of legal proceedings.
It help to know if the suspect is guilty or not by conducting series of tests. These tests are been conducted with the help of experts in the scientific, medical, or technological field.
Learn more about forensic evidence on:
https://brainly.com/question/3049628
#SPJ1
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
Alcohol first effects the area of the brain that controls
Answer:
cerebral cortex
Explanation:
When one consumes alcohol, the first area of the brain to be affected is the cerebral cortex
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
The Rule against Perpetuities is a common law restriction against creating interests that would vest at uncertain times or too far in the future. True False
The Statement "The Rule against Perpetuities is a common law restriction against creating interests that would vest at uncertain times or too far in the future" is True.
The Rule against Perpetuities is indeed a common law restriction that prohibits the creation of future interests in property that would vest or take effect too remotely in the future. The rule aims to prevent the tying up of property for an excessive duration and to promote marketability and certainty in property transactions.
The rule is based on the principle that property should not be tied up or held in a state of uncertainty indefinitely. It seeks to balance the interests of property owners who want to control the disposition of their assets and the broader public policy goal of promoting the free transferability and effective use of property.
So, the given statement is True.
Learn more about Perpetuities
https://brainly.com/question/28590130
#SPJ11