Oedipus was a tragic hero of Greek mythology, a king doomed to a dire fate because he unknowingly killed his father and married his mother. His story is the tale of someone who, because he did not know his true identity, followed the wrong path in life. Once he had set foot on that path, his best qualities could not save him from the results of actions that violated the laws of gods and men. Oedipus represents two enduring themes of Greek myth and drama: the flawed nature of humanity and an individual's powerlessness against the course of destiny in a harsh universe.
Answers
Oedipus is the tragic main character of "one of the best-known of all narratives" in Ancient Greek - or any other - mythology. He is the son of Laius and Jocasta, King and Queen of Thebes.
Oedipus was eventually adopted by the childless King Polybus after being abandoned as a baby to die in the mountains by his father, who had been forewarned that his son would kill him and marry his wife. The young oedipus fled Corinth in terror and disgust after unwittingly learning about the horrific prophecy, and thanks to a tragic twist of fate, he eventually ran upon his true father at a busy intersection. He came across the enormous gate-guarding Sphinx in the Theban city. Oedipus killed both of them after a brief disagreement with Laius' charioteer about who should go first. Oedipus was then presented with the vacant Thebes kingdom and the ex-widow, king's his mother, as a bridegroom after solving her riddle.
learn more about oedipus here:
https://brainly.com/question/11269497
#SPJ4
Related Questions
During the industrial age, what were the hardships immigrants faced that caused them to leave their home
countries? Choose four answers.
O famine
O rising taxes
U job shortages
O crop failure
O contaminated water
Answers
hope it helped
How many rioters were killed to end the nika revolt
Answers
Answer:
around thirty thousand people where killed towards the end of the nika revolt
14. What was the United States political position in 1938 - 1941?
Answers
Answer:
The United States remained neutral during this period. Also in this period Nazi Germany invaded and occupied much of Europe taking over and controlling all the jews.
Explanation:
The people of store age how and where they may hare lived
Answers
If I understand your question correctly, you're asking how and where people during the Stone Age lived. The Stone Age was a broad prehistoric period that lasted for millions of years. It is further divided into three main phases: the Paleolithic, Mesolithic, and Neolithic periods. Each of these periods had different living conditions and housing structures. Let's explore them briefly.
Paleolithic Period: During the Paleolithic period, which began around 2.6 million years ago and lasted until about 10,000 BCE, humans were primarily hunter-gatherers. They lived in small, mobile groups and did not settle in permanent locations. Their main focus was food and shelter. Paleolithic people often lived in caves or rock shelters, using natural formations for protection from the elements. They would also construct temporary shelters using branches, animal skins, and other available materials.Mesolithic Period: The Mesolithic period, also known as the Middle Stone Age, occurred between the end of the Paleolithic period and the beginning of the Neolithic period. This was roughly from 10,000 BCE to 4,000 BCE. During this time, there was a shift toward a more settled lifestyle as humans exploited natural resources more efficiently. They continued to live in caves and rock shelters, but they also built semi-permanent settlements near rivers, lakes, and coastlines. These settlements often consisted of huts or tents made from wood, animal bones, and hides.Neolithic Period: The Neolithic period, beginning around 10,000 BCE and lasting until approximately 2,000 BCE, witnessed significant advancements in human civilization. It was characterized by the emergence of agriculture, animal domestication, and the development of pottery and more sophisticated tools. With the ability to cultivate crops and raise livestock, people established permanent settlements. Neolithic communities built houses made of mud, stone, and wood, often using timber frames and thatched roofs. These houses were larger and more durable than previous structures.It's imperative to note that living conditions during the Stone Age varied depending on geographical location and climate. In some regions, people may have lived in tents, while in others, they might have constructed elaborate communal structures. Additionally, the available resources and cultural practices of different Stone Age societies would have influenced their housing styles and ways of life.
A network of paths running through Laos and Cambodia by which North Vietnam was able to supply its troops and the Vietcong in South Vietnam is called?
Answers
The H-o C-hi Minh Trail was a network of paths running through Laos and Cambodia by which North Vietnam was able to supply its troops and the Vietcong in South Vietnam.
It was named after the late president of North Vietnam, H-o C-hi Minh. The Trail was an integral part of the North Vietnamese strategy during the Vietnam War, allowing them to move troops, weapons and supplies to the South without being detected by US forces.
It was made up of a complex network of roads, paths, and trails that stretched for thousands of miles and often changed course to avoid detection. It was also used to a lesser extent to move people and supplies back from the South to the North.
The Trail was a major logistical challenge for the North Vietnamese, with supplies having to be moved over difficult terrain and often under harsh weather conditions. Despite the dangers, the Trail allowed the North Vietnamese to move supplies to the South and ultimately helped them win the war.
To know more about US forces, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/4468883
#SPJ4
Identify the island nation that the allies fought to liberate in the battle of leyte.
Answers
The island nation that the Allies fought to liberate in the Battle of Leyte is the Philippines.
The Battle of Leyte was a significant military campaign during World War II, specifically in October 1944. It was fought between the Allied forces, primarily the United States, and the Imperial Japanese Army in the Philippines. The objective of the Allies was to liberate the island nation of the Philippines from Japanese occupation. Leyte, an island in the central part of the Philippines, was strategically important due to its location and resources.
The battle resulted in a decisive victory for the Allies, marking a turning point in the Pacific theater of the war. The liberation of Leyte was a crucial step towards the eventual defeat of Japan and the restoration of Philippine independence.
Learn more about battle of leyte here
https://brainly.com/question/16987002
#SPJ11
I will mark brainliest for the CORRECT answer
Answers
Answer:
The two ways in that Hinduism has affected modern Indian society are: "The caste system limits job choices for Indians" and "Families offer food to deities along with their prayers." Hinduism has always been attached to the religious beliefs of Indian people, not only in the past but in the present day.
Explanation:
What are the three main aspects of the Mahayana path?
Answers
Bodhichitta is added by Mahayana to them in order to entirely remove all obscurations. Renunciation, bodhichitta, and voidness are the three main characteristics of the path since they contain the essence of all Hinayana and Mahayana teachings.
Renunciation, a very strong bodhichitta goal, and a thorough understanding of voidness—as taught by Nagarjuna and his two spiritual sons are the three main aspects of the path that serve as the Mahayana path foundation for our famous tantras, which have the profound subject of the subtle bodies, energy-winds, energy-channels, and energy-drops. In addition to this, tantra encourages us to place our pride or dignity in the possibility of what we can accomplish with the help of consciousness and subtle winds.
learn more about Mahayana path here:
https://brainly.com/question/29793503
#SPJ4
read above and answer
Answers
Population growth can lead to pressure on resources, but other factors like development and technology also play a role.
There is a complicated connection between populace development and the accessibility of assets, and it fluctuates relying upon a few elements, like the degree of monetary turn of events, mechanical headways, and the idea of the assets being referred to.
As a general rule, as populace develops, there is expanded tension on assets like food, water, and energy. This can prompt overconsumption, consumption of assets, and ecological debasement.
In any case, it is critical to take note of that this relationship isn't really direct or uniform. For instance, now and again, populace development can prompt expanded advancement and mechanical headways, which can thusly increment asset proficiency and efficiency.
Additionally, the accessibility of assets not entirely set in stone by their outright amount, yet in addition by their dissemination, availability, and quality. In certain districts, for example, asset overflow has not really converted into financial development or improvement because of elements like unfortunate administration or deficient foundation.
Generally speaking, while populace development can come down on assets, it isn't the main variable forming their accessibility and usage after some time. Different factors like financial turn of events, mechanical development, and administration assume significant parts in deciding how assets are utilized and appropriated.
To learn more about Population growth, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29315599
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
What are the patterns observed with regard to the relationship between population growth and the amount of resources available over time, considering factors such as economic development and technological advancements?
I NEED HELP ASAP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Correspondence from Bernardo de Gálvez to John Campbell.
At the time we are reciprocally making one another the same propositions, for both of us aimed at the conservation of the goods and property of the individuals of Pensacola, at the same time, I say, the insult of burning the houses facing my Camp on the other side of the bay is committed before my very eyes. This fact tells of the bad faith with which you work and write, as also the conduct observed with the people from Mobile, a great many of whom have been victims of the horrible cruelties protected by your Excellency; all proves that your expressions are not sincere, that humanity is a phrase that although you repeat it on paper, your heart does not know, that your intentions are to gain time to complete the destruction of Western Florida . . . . God keep your Excellency many years. Island of Sta. Rosa, March 22, 1781.
–“Diary of the Operations against Pensacola,”
Bernardo de Gálvez
What reasons does Gálvez give for writing this response to Campbell?
to anger Campbell into launching an attack without the proper preparations
to outline the terms that both have agreed to follow during the siege
to condemn Campbell for going back on his word and destroying property
to indicate a location where wounded troops could be treated
Answers
Answer:
C. to condemn Campbell for going back on his word and destroying property
Explanation:
i am smart ;)
2+2
its for u guys to get more points
Answers
Answer:
The answer is 4
Thank you for the opportunity
Two is 1+1
Which equals 2
Then you add another two which is another 1+1
Which is 1+1+1+1
It equals 4
whistler sued who for libel? whistler sued who for libel? john ruskin joseph paxton john everett millais edouard manet
Answers
James Abbott McNeill Whistler sued John Ruskin for libel in 1878. The incident arose after Ruskin wrote a review of Whistler's painting Nocturne in Black and Gold, accusing Whistler of "flinging a pot of paint in the public's face."
Whistler sued Ruskin for damages, claiming that Ruskin's criticism of his work was an insult to his reputation as an artist. The case was heard at the Queen's Bench of the High Court of Justice in London in 1878. In his defense, Ruskin argued that he was entitled to his opinion and that his criticism was based on his belief that Whistler's painting was not worth the price he was asking for it.
Whistler, on the other hand, argued that Ruskin's review had caused him financial loss and damage to his reputation as an artist. The jury found in favour of Whistler, awarding him only one farthing in damages. Despite this small sum, the verdict was seen as a victory for Whistler and a defeat for Ruskin, who was widely criticized for his attack on Whistler's work.
The case is considered an important landmark in the history of art criticism and the legal protection of artists' rights to their own work.
For such more question on John Ruskin:
https://brainly.com/question/15827436
#SPJ11
What seems most striking to you about the ways Presidents Bush41 and Bill Clinton addressed the post-Cold War world? In other words, what kind of approach did the U.S. seem to take once the Soviet Union was no longer the No. 1 threat?
Answers
The end of the Cold War led to a change in how the U.S. approached foreign policy.
George H.W. Bush, the 41st President of the United States, and Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, had different approaches to foreign policy in the post-Cold War world.
What seemed most striking about the ways Presidents Bush41 and Bill Clinton addressed the post-Cold War world?
Once the Soviet Union was no longer the No. 1 threat, the United States appeared to shift towards a more interventionist foreign policy.
Bush's approach was focused on the use of military force and diplomacy to promote American values and interests around the world.
He emphasized the importance of building strong alliances and coalitions to promote peace and stability in regions where the U.S. had strategic interests, such as the Persian Gulf.
Bill Clinton's foreign policy was more focused on economic and diplomatic engagement. He believed in the power of economic sanctions to promote change in countries that were not aligned with U.S. interests, such as Cuba and North Korea.
Clinton also emphasized the importance of building strong economic partnerships with countries around the world to promote trade and economic growth.
Thus, both the Presidents, Bush41 and Bill Clinton, addressed the post-Cold War world with different approaches,
Bush's approach was focused on the use of military force and diplomacy to promote American values and interests around the world, whereas, Clinton's foreign policy was more focused on economic and diplomatic engagement.
TO know more about post-Cold War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10055492
#SPJ11
Which author of the Declaration of Independence disagreed with many of Alexander Hamilton’s ideas? Thomas Jefferson John Adams Benjamin Franklin George Washington
Answers
Answer:
Thomas Jefferson
Explanation:
Jefferson thought the Constitution did not give the govt the power to establish banks. He thought states should issue their own money. you have to remember that Hamilton did not always agree with the constitution.
Answer:
Thomas Jefferson
Explanation:
got it right on edge.
The Glorious Revolution and the concept of representative government found their best defense in the Second Treatise of Civil Government by a John Locke. b Peter Paul Rubens. c Thomas Hobbes. d Jean Racine
Answers
The Glorious Revolution and the concept of representative government found their best defense in the Second Treatise of Civil Government by Thomas Hobbes. Option (C)
The Glorious Revolution and the concept of representative government found their best defense in the works of political philosopher John Locke, not Peter Paul Rubens or Jean Racine.
However, Thomas Hobbes, another influential political philosopher, presented a contrasting view of government in his work called "Leviathan."
Hobbes' perspective emphasized the need for a strong central authority and a social contract to maintain order and prevent chaos. His ideas were distinct from Locke's and did not align with the defense of representative government seen in the Glorious Revolution. So, The correct answer is c. Thomas Hobbes.
Learn more about Leviathan
https://brainly.com/question/12069986
#SPJ11
NEED ASAP
In the context of the text, why do people do bad things? (from the POV of the Aztec people
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
From the perspective of the Aztec people, the motivations for individuals to engage in "bad" actions might be attributed to various factors. Some possible reasons could include:
Cultural and religious beliefs: The Aztec civilization had a complex religious system with a pantheon of gods and goddesses, including gods of war, sacrifice, and fertility. The belief in the need for human sacrifice as a way to appease the gods and ensure the survival of the civilization was deeply ingrained in Aztec culture. This belief system may have led some individuals to participate in acts that may be considered "bad" in modern times, such as human sacrifice or other violent rituals, out of a sense of religious obligation or societal pressure.
Social and economic pressures: Like any civilization, the Aztecs likely had social and economic hierarchies, where individuals may have faced pressures to conform to societal norms or fulfill certain roles. Economic struggles or a desire for social advancement could have driven some individuals to engage in actions that may be considered "bad" from a moral standpoint, such as theft, deception, or exploitation of others.
Survival instincts: The Aztecs lived in a challenging environment, with limited resources and frequent conflicts with neighboring tribes. In such a context, individuals may have been driven to do whatever was necessary to survive, including acts that may be seen as morally wrong, such as aggression, theft, or betrayal.
Cultural conditioning: The Aztec society had its own set of norms, values, and traditions that shaped the behavior and mindset of its people. Some individuals may have been influenced by the prevailing cultural norms that may have justified or even glorified certain actions that may be considered "bad" by modern standards.
why did william of orange's ascension to the throne of england mean a new era of warfare in europe?
Answers
William of Orange's ascension to the throne ushered in a new era of warfare in Europe due to religious divisions, political alliances, and a reconfigured balance of power among European nations.
William of Orange's ascension to the throne of England in 1689 meant a new era of warfare in Europe because it resulted in the formation of the Grand Alliance against France. This alliance was formed to counter the ambitions of Louis XIV of France, who had been expanding his territory through military conquests. William III, who was already leading the Dutch Republic in a war against France, brought his experience and resources to the Grand Alliance. With England's participation, the alliance was able to counter France's military advances and limit its expansion in Europe. The resulting wars, including the Nine Years' War and the War of the Spanish Succession, lasted for almost 30 years and had a significant impact on the balance of power in Europe. The era also saw the rise of new military tactics, weapons, and strategies, leading to the development of modern warfare.
William of Orange's ascension to the throne of England in 1688 marked a new era of warfare in Europe due to several factors, including religious tensions, shifting alliances, and the balance of power.
First, William's accession intensified religious tensions, as he was a Protestant, whereas his predecessor James II was Catholic. This led to conflicts between Catholic and Protestant nations in Europe, further escalating hostilities.
Second, William's rise to power resulted in shifting alliances. For instance, the Grand Alliance was formed, including England, the Dutch Republic, and other countries to counter the power of Catholic France, which was seen as a common threat.
Lastly, the balance of power in Europe was significantly altered. With England and the Dutch Republic now united under one ruler, their combined forces posed a substantial challenge to other European powers, leading to a series of wars and conflicts in the late 17th and early 18th centuries.
Learn more about ascension here :-
https://brainly.com/question/207368
#SPJ11
What problems did the new constitution solve, according to Washington?
Answers
Answer: The new Constitution divided the legislature into two halves, each with equal authority for the states and one with population-based power for the states. Cause: Under the Articles of Confederation, states had the authority to disregard legislation established by the legislature. The new Constitution declared that federal laws supersede state laws.
Explanation: Brainlist pls
17. How did the Zimmerman note influence the American government's decision to enter the war
on the side of the Allied forces?
Answers
Answer: In the message, Zimmermann instructed the German diplomats to approach the Mexican government, if United States entered the war in Europe, to offer an alliance between Germany and Mexico. ... President Wilson broke off diplomatic relations on February 3, 1917, after German submarine attacks resumed.
Explanation: brainliest ?
The Toleration Act of 1649 was passed in Maryland because
Answers
Answer: Long before the First Amendment was adopted, the assembly of the Province of Maryland passed “An Act Concerning Religion,” also called the Maryland Toleration Act of 1649. The act was meant to ensure freedom of religion for Christian settlers of diverse persuasions in the colony.
Explanation: The Toleration Act of 1649 was passed in Maryland because
Unit Test
Unit Test Active
11
12 13
14
15
16
18 19 20
Which question would a government leader most likely ask when using a cost-benefit analysis to make a decision?
O How will this decision affect people and society?
O Is the cost-benefit analysis the best tool to use?
O Is the cost-benefit analysis accurate?
O How will other leaders feel about the decision?
Answers
Answer:
The question which a government leader most likely asks when using a cost-benefit analysis to make a decision :
How will this decision affect people and society?Leaders are supposed to look after people from whom they get votes and try to make their life as easy as possible along with living conditions, and lifestyle.
Explanation:
Please give brainliest! :D
Henry Cabot lodge, as head of the us foreign affairs committee, wanted
Answers
Answer:
to keep trade relations safe and build foregin bonds with iran
Explanation:
seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Answers
Answer:
Autocracy, Oligarchy, Democracy.
Explanation:
The principles of equality, respect for human rights, and the practice of holding universal suffrage periodic and legitimate elections are fundamental elements of democracy. Democracy is a form of system in which citizens elect the rulers.
Oligarchy simply referred to the government by the few, particularly despotic power exercised for cynical or self-centered purposes by a small and privileged community. Oligarchies in which ruling party leaders are affluent or exert their influence using their wealth.
An autocracy also defined as a single person party is a form of government in which an autocrat holds supreme and absolute power. This autocrat's decisions are subject to neither external legal constraints nor regularized common control structures.
Gandhi supported which of the following
Answers
What is the plot of the glory field?
Answers
The main plot of The Glory Field is the intergenerational story of an African American family, tracing their lineage from slavery to modern times.
The novel is divided into six parts, each focused on a different member of the Lewis family and set during a different historical period. Through the characters' experiences, Myers explores the themes of racism, identity, and the struggle for freedom and equality. The novel culminates in a family reunion on the South Carolina plantation where their ancestors were enslaved, providing a powerful conclusion that emphasizes the importance of remembering and honoring one's heritage. Overall, The Glory Field offers a compelling and poignant portrayal of the African American experience in the United States.
For more questions like Glory Field visit the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30712332
#SPJ11
GIVING BRAINLIEST!!
You are a college student in Charleston in early 1861. Seven southern states have left the Union and formed their own government. All-out war seems unavoidable. Your friends have begun to volunteer for either the Union or the Confederate forces. You are torn between
loyalty to your home state and to the United States.
Would you join the Union Army or the Confederate Army?
Answers
Answer:
I would join the Confederate army.
Explanation:
Both Confederate and Union army have their own advantages and disadvantages.
Confederate army were fighting for their own nation and also to end slavery. They were on the defensive side of the war and were not attacking any unknown enemy area. They just had to defend their rights. They had enough food supply also. One of the strengths of Confederate army was that they were having some former U.S. army officers with a good experience in military field.
The Union had a bigger army and also they had sufficient of money and others factors essential for war. But they had extremely bad leaders to lead them. Also, they didn't have proper support from their group of population.
What are the conspiracy theories involving JFK's death?
Answers
Answer:
There are many conspiracy theories involving John F. Kennedy's death. Many of them involve the Bay of Pigs and the CIA. Here are three theories to satisfy your question.
1. The CIA Killed Kennedy.After the utter failure of the Bay of Pigs, President Kennedy lost faith in the CIA. He mostly ignored their suggestions, as seen in the Cuban missile crisis. Many at the CIA feared they would lose their job. When the Cuban Missle Crisis arose, many members of the military urged Kennedy to prepare for war. He didn't. He peacefully dealt with the situation. Thus, hurt feelings and angered members lead to his assassination. It is important to note and a proven fact that the CIA had hired the mafia to murder the Cuban leader, Fidel Castro.
2. Lyndon. B. Johnson Killed Kennedy.If Kennedy won the next election, he planned to replace Johnson. Thus, people believe Johnson ordered Kennedy's death.
3. Revenge!After the Bay of Pigs fiasco, Fidel Castro wanted revenge on Kennedy. Thus, he ordered Kennedy's death. A similar theory holds that Russia hired the assassin, who was a communist, to kill Kennedy.
Please remember these are simply theories. Aside from the first one, all of them have been proven false. Have a great one!
16. How did the Monroe Doctrine justify the U.S. expansionist efforts in the Western Hemisphere
Answers
Answer:
In 1823 U.S. President James Monroe proclaimed the U.S. protector of the Western Hemisphere by forbidding European powers from colonizing additional territories in the Americas. In return, Monroe committed to not interfere in the affairs, conflicts, and extant colonial enterprises of European states.
Explanation:
vvAsk a question about your assignment
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
3. Who were some of the potential enemies that posed a threat to Georgia and the Carolinas?
Answers
There were several potential enemies that posed a threat to Georgia and the Carolinas throughout history
Some of potential enemies that posed a threatNative American tribes
the native american tribes that inhabited the region before the arrival of europeans were a significant threat to early settlers in georgia and the carolinas tribes such as the cherokee creek and seminole resisted encroachment on their lands and clashed with european settlers and american soldiers
Spanish Florida
Spain claimed Florida as a colony and attempted to extend its influence over the southeastern region of north america including georgia and the carolinas spanish florida posed a military and economic threat to the english colonies in the region
Learn more about Georgia at
https://brainly.com/question/13864204
#SPJ4