It's true that, obeying any law is the only right and fair in order to do because it reduces or helps us to treat others as well in the way we want to be treated.
Obeying the regulation protects peace, public order, and precise health. The First Amendment's Religion Clauses have been designed to defend any such criminal gadget. They aimed to maintain a various populace at peace via way of means of giving them one shared gadget of regulation. In order to obey the regulation someone need to act with a few popularity that she is in truth doing an motion that the regulation calls for.
In a phrase, obedience calls for knowingly doing the proper thing. The ethical duty to obey the regulation, or as it's far normally called, political duty, is a ethical requirement to obey the legal guidelines of one's country. Some criminal philosophers argue that there a trendy ethical duty to obey the regulation- that the truth that a regulation needs sure behaviour ought to be morally crucial to us no matter what the regulation genuinely says.
Learn more about law Visit : brainly.com/question/25368237
#SPJ4
Joe a citizen of France, request a copy of an existing report from the security exchange commission’s detailing the effects of derivative financial Products and their potential effects on the US stock market. Joe does not own any derivative financial products, nor does he have any investment accounts whatsoever. The SEC denies joes request on this basis as well as not being AUS citizen. Has the S EC committed any violation of the law? How so?
The Security Exchange Commission (SEC) is a federal administrative agency tasked with monitoring markets, enforcing securities laws, and developing new regulations.
There have been no legal violations by the SEC. Joe must be a US citizen or a foreigner with a valid visa in order to see a study from the Security Exchange Commission that discusses the implications of derivative financial products and their possible effects on the US stock market. Joe, a French national, asked the Securities and Exchange Commission for a copy of a report that discussed the implications of derivative financial products and their possible impact on the US stock market. Joe has no investment accounts of any kind and does not hold any derivative financial instruments. Due to this and the fact that Joe is not a US citizen, the SEC rejects his request. However, the SEC hasn't broken the law in any way. Any US citizen or foreign national with a valid visa is allowed to request a copy of any current reports from the SEC, according the law. Joe, however, is unable to view the SEC's study on the impact of derivative financial products and their possible impact on the US stock market since he is not a US citizen.
To know more about Security Exchange Commission (SEC):
https://brainly.com/question/9089676
#SPJ11
Please help me??
after learning about the correctional system in the united states, do you agree or disagree with prison privatization? do you think it would work for one type of facility (i.e. local, state, or federal) more than another? explain your stance.
Prison privatization helps the government to reduce costs associated with running a correctional facilities, and it will work for any type of facilities local, state, or federal correctional facilities.
Prison privatization refers to the transfer of ownership and operation of prisons from the government to private, for-profit companies. Proponents of prison privatization argue that private prisons can save money by operating more efficiently and effectively than government-run facilities.
In terms of which type of facility might be more suited to privatization, this would depend on factors such as specific laws and policies of the jurisdiction. Ultimately, while privatization work for any level may it be local, state, or federal facilities, the decision to privatize prisons, is a complex one that involves balancing a range of considerations, including cost, efficiency, accountability, and the impact on stakeholders such as inmates, staff, and the community.
To learn more about prison privatization visit: https://brainly.com/question/16901807
#SPJ4
After analyzing his business venture, Jim chalked out a business plan, which included maintaining a high liquidity to cover any cash crunch at a future date. He also insured his inventory to cover all losses that could arise due to theft and damage as his goods are transported and stored in warehouses all over the country. How would you classify his plan? Jim’s business policy could be classified as a plan.
Jim's business plan could be classified as a financial plan, which is part of the strategic business plan.
What is a strategic business plan?A strategic business plan sets the overall goal for the business and marshalls out priorities on how to achieve the plan.
A strategic plan includes the business's vision, goals, and initiatives, describing the customers and their needs and how to deliver a unique value to the customers.
Thus, with Jim's plan concentrating on the financial aspects of the business plan, his plan could be classified as a financial plan.
Learn more about financial planning at https://brainly.com/question/12890843
The patriot act allows federal officials more latitude in.
The Patriot Act grants federal officials more latitude in areas related to national security and counterterrorism.
It increases surveillance capabilities enabling closer monitoring of electronic communications and data gathering. The act encourages information sharing between intelligence and law enforcement organizations, improving cooperation in identifying and thwarting terrorist activities. Additionally it strengthens financial investigations to find potential funding sources for terrorist groups.
To increase national security, border and immigration controls are strengthened. The Patriot Act promotes collaboration between law enforcement and the intelligence community and makes it easier to share materials and data. However, the act has sparked discussions and controversies because of worries about civil liberties and privacy rights.
Learn more about Patriot Act at:
brainly.com/question/11306077
#SPJ4
Complete question will be "The patriot act allows federal officials more latitude in ."
critical criminologists believe that criminology should be expanded to include study of the injustices and social harms perpetrated by those who hold power. group of answer choices a)True b)False
The statement is true. Critical criminologists believe that criminology should be expanded to include the study of injustices and social harms perpetrated by those in positions of power.
Critical criminologists advocate for a broader understanding of criminology that goes beyond the traditional focus on street crime and individual offenders. They argue that the field should encompass the examination of systemic injustices and social harms committed by powerful individuals and institutions. This perspective seeks to analyze the structural and societal factors that contribute to crime and deviance, including the role of power dynamics, social inequalities, and oppressive systems.
Critical criminologists emphasize the importance of studying white-collar crime, corporate misconduct, state violence, institutional discrimination, and other forms of harm perpetrated by individuals and entities with power and influence. They highlight how these acts can have significant social, economic, and political consequences, yet often go unnoticed or receive less attention compared to street-level offenses.
Expanding the scope of criminology to include the study of injustices and social harms perpetrated by the powerful aligns with a critical perspective that challenges existing power structures and seeks social justice. It recognizes the need to analyze and address the crimes and harms that occur within societal institutions and power dynamics, in addition to examining individual criminal behavior.
Learn more about Critical criminologists here: https://brainly.com/question/32764138
#SPJ11
Type the correct answer in the box spell all words correctly
Who plays the role of a plaintiff in a criminal case
In a criminal case, the ______plays the role of a plaintiff
Answer:
trick question the answer is plaintiff
Explanation:
Type the correct answer in the box spell all words correctly
Who plays the role of a plaintiff in a criminal case
In a criminal case, the ______plays the role of a plaintiff
Which international conflict resulted from tensions between the US and Soviet Union A)Cuban missile crisis B)the Vietnam war C) the Korean War D) The bay of pigs invasion
Answer:
The bay of pigs invasion
Explanation:
The Bay of Pigs Invasion in April 1961 was a failed attack launched by the CIA during ... Bay of Pigs: President Kennedy and the Cold War ... with the Soviet Union, and the United States responded by prohibiting the ... In 1962, the Cuban missile crisis inflamed American-Cuban-Soviet tensions even further.
An expressway loop is marked by how many digits
If a minor is served alcoholic beverages, who is legally responsible?
Answer:
it will always be the fault of the person who provides it
Explanation:
If a minor is served alcoholic beverages, then the person who is legally responsible is the seller or the bartender.
Who is a bartender?A person who is involved in formulating and serving alcoholic or soft drink beverages behind the bar, usually in a licensed establishment, is known as a bartender. It is the bartender who usually maintains the supplies and inventory for the bar.
On demand of the customers, a bartender generally mix classic cocktails such as a Cosmopolitan, Manhattan, Old Fashioned, and Mojito. It is the bartender who checks the IDs of customers before selling them alcoholic beverages.
Therefore, it's the bartender who is responsible for selling the alcoholic beverage to the minor.
Learn more about bartender from here:
https://brainly.com/question/1922923
#SPJ2
How many points of minutiae comparison are usually required for convictions?
The location of these nitty-gritty details is compared by software. The number of points is not regulated by law in the United States. Criminal courts typically accept between eight and twelve points of similarity. When comparing samples of fingerprints, use these characteristics as identifiers.
To match fingerprints, how many minute details are required?Minutiae points The number of minutiae in a good fingerprint image can range from 25 to 80, depending on the resolution of the fingerprint scanner and where the finger is positioned on the sensor. The most important parts of a fingerprint's image are its minutiae points, which are used to match fingerprints.
How many nitty-gritty details are there?As a result, "Galton details" also refer to minute details. Forensic experts use them to match two fingerprints. There are approximately 150 distinct categories of minutiae based on their configuration.
Learn more about fingerprint scanner here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940729
#SPJ1
what are the similarities between the law in the old testament and the law in the new testament?
Answer:
The relationship between the Old Covenant and the New can be presented as follows: God has only one covenant of grace, and only one eternal people - in which a person obtains a share through faith in Christ alone, the Covenant Head and the Adam of the new humanity.
Explanation:
Who did Jeremy Bentham think deserved special consideration?
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Who was Jeremy Bentham What did he believe in?Even though he was a strong supporter of expanding individual legal rights, he opposed natural law and natural rights, which are both thought to have a "divine" or "God-given" origin, and referred to them as "nonsense upon stilts." Legal fiction was harshly criticized by Bentham as well.
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure (and morally wrong if they tend to promote unhappiness or pain) among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Bentham recognized that, regardless of the overall cost to the community, rulers sought to advance their own happiness rather than the greatest happiness of those who were under their control.
To learn more about Jeremy Bentham refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1085669
#SPJ4
In 250 words or less, explain how the role and function of the legislative branch has changed over
time. Provide 2 specific examples.
Answer:
Changes in the Legislative Branch
Congress is the legislative branch of the federal government, the branch that makes the laws. The men who wrote the Constitution at a federal convention in summer 1787 created Congress to promote American commerce (business), protect property, and provide a strong military. (See chapter 3, "Constitutional Role of the Legislative Branch.") According to Howard Zinn in A People's History of the United States, by protecting property and promoting commerce, the Constitution did "enough for small property owners, for middle-income mechanics [skilled workers] and farmers, to build a broad base of support."
Answer:
basically the legislative branch is a senate which together from the United States Congress the senate is composed to 100 senators 2 for each state to be exact.
Explanation:
2. Which of the following is an effect of alcohol on driving?
a) Judgment impairment
b) Increased driving efficiency
c) Increased driving awareness
The enumerated powers of congress and the national government are those.
The enumerated powers of Congress and the national government are Levying taxes, regulating trade, creating a standard rule of naturalization, establishing federal courts, creating and maintaining a standing army, and declaring war are all among the enumerated powers. This is further explained below.
What is Congress?Generally, Congress is simply defined as a gathering of representatives from several organizations; often members of a political party, a labor union, or experts in a specific field who have been invited to participate in a series of sessions to debate issues of mutual interest.
In conclusion, Congress stands to check the president.
Read more about Congress
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ1
Cortical consumption is all of the following except
Answer:
Cortical functions are well-defined for primary cortical areas like motor, sensory and visual functions. ... Recent data from functional imaging indicate that large and diverse areas of the cerebral cortex are involved in planning motor tasks or coding (memory).Explanation:
.
.
.
.
please mark me brrenlist ✨✨⭐A trial between shane and verna results in a jury verdict in shane’s favor. After the jury renders its verdict, verna’s attorney can file a motion true or false?.
True, After the jury renders its verdict, Verna's attorney can file a motion
What is a new trial?When a new trial is held, the court case is repeated. A new trial may be ordered for part or all of the concerns from the previous study. According to national legislation and the court judgment that authorized it, the following situations may warrant a new trial:
A jury cannot render a verdict.When a new trial is necessary, either a trial court grants a party's request for one, generally on the grounds that the earlier trial was legally flawed, or an appellate court reverses a judgment.To know more about the motion for a new trial visit:- brainly.com/question/14434716
#SPJ4
Restatements of law can best be described as summaries of common law rules in a particular area of the law that have been enacted by
Restatements of law can best be described as summaries of common law rules in a particular area of the law that have been enacted by legal scholars. The Restatements of the Law is a set of legal treatises published by the American Law Institute (ALI).
Restatements of the Law are a series of documents composed by the American Law Institute (ALI) that are intended to clarify the legal principles that apply to specific areas of law. The Restatements of the Law, unlike traditional law, are not legally binding.
Instead, they're intended to be used by courts to assist them in determining what the law is and how it should be enforced
.Although the Restatements of the Law are not legally binding, courts have been known to use them as persuasive authority when determining cases. As a result, lawyers, judges, and law students regularly refer to the Restatements of the Law when researching legal topics. The Restatements of the Law, like other law-related books and documents, can be found in most legal libraries and are frequently available online.
Learn more about Restatements of law Here-
https://brainly.com/question/29873172
#SPJ11
True/False: george was unhappy about being passed over for a promotion at work. he anonymously posted lies about the company and several managers to an online forum. george is not guilty of internet libel.
The given statement "george was unhappy about being passed over for a promotion at work he anonymously posted lies about the company and several managers to an online forum. george is not guilty of internet libel" is false because George is guilty of internet libel.
George is not guilty of internet libel because libel requires that a false statement be made to cause harm to another. While his post may have been defamatory and damaging, it was in an anonymous forum where no one would be able to personally identify him and the company/managers. Without being able to personally identify
George or the company/managers, there can be no libel. This type of activity does not fall under the legal definition of libel as there is no way for anyone to connect the false statement with a person or entity that has been harmed.
To know more about internet visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13308791
#SPJ4
b. What restrictions, if any, should the government place on the manufacture of firearms? The sale of firearms? The possession of firearms? Explain.
Answer:b
Explanation:
In order to get your original driver license of any type: You will be tested on what four (4) categories.
A) Vision test
B) knowledge of motor vehicles law
C) Traffic Signs
D) Driving Skills
E) All of the above
Answer:
E...
Explanation:
To get your original driver license, you will be tested on vision, motor vehicle law, traffic signs, and driving skills. The correct option is e.
You will be put through four tests in order to get your first driver's license such as vision, legal knowledge of motor vehicles, traffic signs and driving prowess. The vision test determines whether you have the required visual acuity levels for safe driving. Your knowledge of the driving laws and regulations is assessed by the knowledge test.
In order to pass the traffic signs test, you must show that you can recognize a variety of traffic signs and their meanings. Your capacity to drive safely and effectively is evaluated by the driving skills test. If you pass all of these exams, you can be sure that you're ready to get your driver's license and can drive safely.
learn more about driver license here
brainly.com/question/29441847
#SPJ2
is it illegal for landlords to ask for first last and security?
The landlord cannot ask for first last and security deposit.
The current rent laws state that "no deposit or advance shall exceed the amount of one month's rent" in almost all circumstances. Renting an apartment in New York City has a number of known financial challenges: For students and retirees in particular, the process can be challenging due to the high rents and strict income requirements of landlords.
The goal of limiting the security deposit to one month's rent and outlawing the collection of rent deposits in advance is to lessen the excessive amount of money you are required to pay up front.
Learn more about security deposit at:
brainly.com/question/1752098
#SPJ4
mixing clients funds with attorney funds is an ethics violation known as
Answer: Commingling
Explanation:
when a lawyer holds his or her own funds in the same account that is holding client or third party funds.
does law of large numbers apply to accidents on aeroplane
Yes, the Law of Large Numbers can be applied to accidents involving airplanes.
The Law of Large Numbers is a statistical principle that states that as the sample size increases, the average of the sample will tend to approach the expected value of the underlying population. In the context of airplane accidents, this means that as the number of flights increases, the observed accident rate will converge to the true accident rate.
Airplane accidents are rare events, but they can still be analyzed statistically. A large number of flights take place daily, providing ample data for analysis. As more flights are conducted, the overall trend of accident rates becomes clearer, allowing researchers and safety experts to identify patterns and implement preventive measures.
The Law of Large Numbers can be helpful in understanding the safety of air travel. It allows aviation experts to assess the effectiveness of safety protocols and make informed decisions about necessary improvements. As the number of flights continues to grow, the law ensures that the observed accident rates will provide an accurate representation of the true risks associated with air travel. This information is crucial for maintaining and enhancing safety standards in the aviation industry.
In conclusion, the Law of Large Numbers does apply to airplane accidents, as it helps analyze the safety of air travel and contributes to the development of effective safety measures. With an increasing number of flights, the statistical analysis of accident rates becomes more reliable, allowing for a better understanding of risks and the implementation of necessary safety improvements.
Know more about statistical principle here:
https://brainly.com/question/30592795
#SPJ11
Why does soft money tend to exert more influence in elections than hard money? a.Soft money can only be used for ads that are not directly endorsed by political campaigns. b.Soft money tends to involve larger amounts of money than hard money raised by a politician. c.Soft money helps a candidate finance campaign space, pay employees, and reimburse travel expenses.
Answer:
C, i may be wrong but if not can i have brainliest... much appreciated
Explanation:
Hard money refers to coins, while soft money refers to paper currency. But the terms also have a role in politics. They are used to refer to political contributions in the United States.
Answer:
Soft money can only be used for ads that are not directly endorsed by political campaigns.
Explanation:
Laws prevent soft money sources from coordinating their efforts with the campaigns they support, so the money is used almost exclusively for highly polished ads and marketing materials that support a candidate's message without necessarily endorsing the candidate directly. This approach can make voters think that a candidate is supported by independent groups that are only interested in making life better for Americans or by people who have nothing personal to gain from a candidate's election.
Three different way of cultural learning
Cultural learning may be accomplished in three ways:
Imitative learningInstructed learningCollaborative learningWhat is Cultural learning?Cultural learning is the process through which a group of people or animals within a civilization or culture learn and transmit knowledge. Learning styles are heavily impacted by how society interacts with its children and youth. In the last fifty years, a cross-cultural study has mostly concentrated on contrasts between Eastern and Western civilizations. Individuals can gain talents that they would not be able to master on their own during the course of their lives through cultural learning. Cultural learning is thought to be especially essential for humans. When compared to the appearance of adult teeth, humans are weaned at a young age.
To learn more about Cultural learning, click
https://brainly.com/question/29024017
#SPJ1
Sebastian is skateboarding outside the local rec center. On the sidewalk, he finds a wallet that someone has dropped. Sebastian does not see anyone around, and the wallet does not contain an ID, so he takes the wallet inside the recreation center to give to the desk. He hopes that the owner will come looking for it. What are Sebastian’s actions an example of? A. crime B. folkway C. more D. law
Answer:
law i think
Explanation:
if not its more
What is the meaning of Chinese Exclusion Act?
The Chinese Exclusion Act was a federal law in the United States that prohibited Chinese immigrants from entering the country for a period of 10 years, from 1882 to 1892.
It was the first federal law to specifically target a group of immigrants based on their nationality. The law was enacted due to anti-Chinese sentiment and competition for jobs, especially in the western states, and it was motivated by the belief that the Chinese were culturally and racially inferior. The law was later expanded and made permanent until it was finally repealed in 1943. The Chinese Exclusion Act had far-reaching impacts on the Chinese community in the United States and remains a significant event in American history.
Learn more about Chinese Exclusion Act here :
https://brainly.com/question/513896
#SPJ4
Jane Smith listed and sold a company’s building, for which the company paid her a fee. Which would be TRUE regarding this situation?
Answer: You did not give the answer choices
Explanation: I will answer this once you do
since world war ii, all presidential nominees to the supreme court have received at least a confirmation vote in the senate, unless those nominees rescinded their nominations.T/F
The given statement "Since World War II, all presidential nominees to the Supreme Court have received at least a confirmation vote in the Senate, unless those nominees rescinded their nominations." is true because the Constitution grants the President the power to nominate justices to the Supreme Court, but the Senate must confirm the nominee before they can take their seat on the Court.
The Senate's role in the confirmation process serves as a critical check on the President's power, ensuring that the nominee is qualified and possesses the necessary temperament to serve as a member of the Supreme Court. In recent years, however, the confirmation process has become increasingly partisan and contentious, leading to extended delays and heightened scrutiny of nominees.
Despite these challenges, however, the tradition of confirming all Supreme Court nominees has held firm, reflecting the importance of an independent judiciary in upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights and freedoms of all Americans.
To know more about Supreme Court click here
brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11