Socrates rejected the idea that "might makes right" as a definition of justice because he believed that it leads to moral relativism and the oppression of the weak by the strong.
According to Socrates, justice is not simply a matter of power or strength, but rather an objective and universal principle that applies equally to all individuals.
If justice were simply a matter of power, then those who are stronger or more influential would be able to dictate what is right and wrong, regardless of whether their actions are actually just or unjust.
This would lead to a situation where the weak are oppressed by the strong, and where there is no objective standard of morality to guide human behavior.
Socrates believed that justice should be based on reason, rather than on power or strength. He argued that justice is an intrinsic quality that is based on the nature of things, rather than on the arbitrary whims of individuals or societies.
For Socrates, justice is a fundamental principle that governs all human relationships and interactions, and that is essential for the well-being and flourishing of individuals and societies.
learn more about moral relativism here:
https://brainly.com/question/14830074
#SPJ4
"Might makes right" is a bad definition of justice according to Socrates, as it leads to the idea that power and strength dictate morality, which can result in oppression and inequality. Socrates believed in a more principled and fair approach to justice, focusing on virtue and wisdom instead.
"Might makes right" is a flawed concept of justice according to Socrates because it implies that those who are stronger or more powerful have the right to make decisions and impose their will upon others. This approach disregards the value of fairness and impartiality, which are essential to a just society. Additionally, it creates a dangerous power dynamic where those in control can abuse their authority and exploit those who are weaker. Therefore, Socrates believed that justice should be based on objective principles and universal standards, not on the arbitrary exercise of power. It is important to have content loaded with the understanding that justice must be grounded in reason and morality, not in the mere exercise of strength.
Know more about Socrates here:
https://brainly.com/question/31051943
#SPJ11
which of the following clauses serves as the constitutional basis for the federal real id act of 2005, a law that established uniform standards for state-issued identification cards and provided regulation of a state function?
The federal genuine id act of 2005, a law that created universal requirements for state-issued identification cards and provided regulation of a state function, is constitutionally supported under the necessary and appropriate clause.
What is the proper and essential clause?The "Necessary and Proper Clause," sometimes known as the "Elastic Clause," is a provision of the Constitution that grants Congress the power to enact laws about matters that aren't necessarily covered by the document.
The main focus of Article I is the legislative authority (Article II is about the Executive powers and Article III is about Judicial powers). The Constitution specifically grants Congress authority over a wide range of matters, including the following.
Collect taxesClear your debtsLoan moneyControl international trade (see the Commerce Clause)Coin currencyCreate post officesPunish marine piracy and other maritime crimesEstablish a militaryLearn more about the necessary and proper clause with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/17857054
#SPJ1
According to Maryland law, how far does a
driver need to
be from a cyclist
In order to affect laws, the Supreme Court must
A. Create and pass a law
B. Order the President to write and opinion
C. Write and opinion regarding a court case
D. Issue a general proclamation
Answer:
A create and pass a law
Explanation:
So what you want to do every question is take out the ones that dont make sence. Then you need to look what did you go over. Then you can start to get ride of answer if you aren't sure.
I hoped this helps you have a nice day!!
The rediscovery of the covenant law caused King Josiah to lead the nation of Judah in covenant renewal and reform.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
A. True.
Explanation:
The accession of Josiah as the king of Judah when he was just eight years old after the death of his father King Amon. He did what was good in the eyes of the Lord and reigned in Jerusalem for more than thirty years.
In the book of II Kings chapter 22, King Josiah ordered the repairs and work on the Lord's temple. There, the high priest Hilkiah found the Book of the law which was read out to the young king. The news made him so angry and discouraged that he tore off his robes and asked the priests to make the people atone for their sins. The discovery of the Book of the Law led him to lead the whole nation of Judah to repent and ask for forgiveness. At this, God’s anger subsided and He did not go along with His plan of inflicting them with suffering. His action also led to the renewal and reformation of the whole kingdom.
Explain why it is more important than ever to be able to independently research and comprehend news stories from multiple sources.
Answer:
Explanation:
In today's world, we are bombarded with news and information from various sources, and it can be challenging to distinguish between credible and fake news. Misinformation can spread rapidly, and without the ability to research and comprehend news stories from multiple sources, it can be challenging to form an accurate understanding of what is happening in the world. Being able to independently research news stories from multiple sources allows us to form informed opinions, make better decisions, and ultimately, become more responsible citizens. It also helps us to avoid falling prey to biased reporting and propaganda, which can be used to manipulate public opinion. With the rise of social media and other online platforms, it has become more critical than ever to be able to identify trustworthy sources and verify information before accepting it as fact. Therefore, being able to independently research and comprehend news stories from multiple sources is an essential skill that enables us to stay informed, make informed decisions, and participate meaningfully in society.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
que es la economia colonial y sus caracterizticas?
Answer:
Elements of pilgrim economy Colonial economy was trade situated (for example creation of money crops, mineral. It was shady in nature, that is Africans were profoundly taken advantage of. It went connected at the hip with estrangement of (Africans were distanced from their territory which was utilized by the Europeans).
Hope this helped! :D
Question 10 (1 point)
Consent searches occur when there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be
destroyed. In a consent search, officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant or
following other usual rules of criminal procedure.
True
O False
Answer:
False. Hope this helped!
Explanation:
The us superior court is
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal court system of the United States.
The Supreme Court is the final arbiter of all cases and disputes originating under the US Constitution and other US laws. Supreme Court has final court of appeal jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving an argument of federal law.
As the ultimate authority of the law, the Supreme Court is tasked with assuring the American people of the commitment of equal justice under law, and thus serves as the Constitution's guardian and interpreter.
Learn more on Supreme Court -
https://brainly.com/question/14411708
#SPJ9
what is RA 6675 The Generic Act of 1988
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
3.a person who believes that there should be no government or laws whatsoever is most likely a(n) ______.
An anarchist is most likely someone who thinks there should be no laws or government at all.
Anarchism is a political ideology and movement that rejects any justifications for authority and seeks to destroy the structures that it believes sustain unnecessarily strong hierarchy and coercion, which frequently includes, but is not limited to, governments, nation states, and capitalism.
No person has the right to coerce another person, and everyone has the right to protect himself against compulsion (the non-aggression principle or zero aggression principle), according to several anarchist ideologies.
Read more about government laws at
https://brainly.com/question/23846754
#SPJ4
An anarchist is someone who believes that there should be no government or laws at all.
Anarchism is a political ideology that opposes all forms of government, arguing that the state is inherently coercive and that society would be better off without it.
Anarchists believe that individuals should be free to govern themselves without interference from external authorities. They reject the idea of a centralized government, as well as laws and regulations that they believe limit individual freedom. Instead, they advocate for decentralized decision-making and direct democracy, where people make decisions together without the need for representatives.
However, it is important to note that there are different forms of anarchism, ranging from individualist anarchism to socialist anarchism. Individualist anarchists emphasize individual freedom, while socialist anarchists advocate for the elimination of private property and the establishment of a cooperative economy.
To learn more about anarchist
https://brainly.com/question/29787365
#SPJ4
The owner of the property has the right to establish
certain rules on their property that may or may not be
part of the criminal code.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
owner of the land has the right to make rules and kick people off the land if they dont listen to the rules
True, the owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Thus option (a) is correct.
What is criminal code?The criminal code or criminal law is a system of laws that is concerned with crimes and the punishment for the persons who commit crimes.
The criminal prosecution involves the government to decide whether to punish an individual for either an act or an omission.
The most of the state has its own criminal code. In a criminal prosecution or proceedings , the burden of proof lies with the government and has to establish every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
The owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about criminal code here:
https://brainly.com/question/24706076
#SPJ2
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act expanded Section 529 education savings accounts to cover costs associated with all of the following except:
A. Registered apprenticeships
B. Homeschooling
C. Clubs' sports programs
D. Up to $10,000 of qualified student loan repayments
The correct answer is option (C). The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act expanded Section 529 education savings accounts to cover costs associated with all of the following except Clubs' sports programs.
Under Code Section 529, a program can be maintained by the state or any of its agency that allows a person to contribute to an account to support the expenses of higher education for a designated beneficiary.
The expenses under higher education includes tuition fees, books, supplies and all other equipment required for the enrollment of a designated beneficiary at an eligible educational institution.
It also cover costs associated with registered apprenticeships and up to $10,000 of qualified student loan repayments.
To know more about Section 529 here
https://brainly.com/question/14619014
#SPJ1
What has been one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech? A) fewwe cases involving minors, B) fewer laws limiting minority rights. ,C) a more accurate election, D) a more informed society
Answer:
D) a more informed society is considered one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech. The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, which has helped promote the exchange of ideas and opinions, and has allowed individuals to express their views and challenge the status quo without fear of retribution. This has led to a more diverse and informed society, where a wide range of viewpoints and opinions are expressed and debated, contributing to a more robust democracy.
What is the impeachment process and removal for federal officials according to the united states constitution?.
The constitution requires a -thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached respectable upon conviction is elimination from the workplace.
In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from protecting public offices inside the destiny. There may be no enchantment.
Article II, phase 4: The President, vice chairman, and all civil officials of the usa, shall be removed from the workplace on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or different excessive Crimes and Misdemeanors. See, e.g., Va.
The constitution offers the residence of Representatives the only energy to impeach an official, and it makes the Senate the only court for impeachment trials. The power of impeachment is confined to elimination from the workplace but also offers a means by which an eliminated officer may be disqualified from preserving future office.
Learn more about constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
4. What does “all levels of government must be on the same page of the book” mean to you?
"All levels of government must be on the same page of the book" in my perspective means that all government entities must have the same level of responsibility. Maintain equality in government officials and level out the power.
Hope this helps. :3
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
1. The economic cost nationwide of alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes annually is between __________ billion dollars.
A. 15 and 20
B. 25 and 30
C. 35 and 40
D. 50 and 55
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It's actually 44 billion but the answer you put says 40, so go with 35 and 40.
Define the constitutional principle of limited government in your own words
Answer:
I guess how I explain it A government where people rule for based on a philosophy
hope this helps please reward me brain list
Pros and cons of the death penalty
Answer:
cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.
pros: no prison
Explanation:
(6)How can companies ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for
breaches of customary international law?
Companies can ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for breaches of customary international law by adhering to international legal standards and conducting thorough due diligence.
To mitigate the risk of lawsuits related to breaches of customary international law, companies should first familiarize themselves with the relevant international legal frameworks and norms. They should identify the specific customary international laws that apply to their operations, such as human rights, labor rights, and environmental protection. Once identified, companies should implement robust compliance programs that align with these standards.
A crucial step is conducting thorough due diligence throughout their supply chains and business operations. This includes assessing and monitoring potential risks, such as human rights abuses, environmental harm, or unethical practices. By identifying and addressing these risks proactively, companies can prevent or mitigate potential breaches of customary international law.
To know more about lawsuits
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
Cathy was incarcerated because she has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren. She has been held in custody for an extended period after her incarceration term ended because she has the possibility of becoming violent, which is also known as:
Answer:
Preventative detention
Explanation:
Preventative detention is a form of incarceration that is given when the detained party is thought of as harmful to the society.
They are detained to prevent further acts of violence or crime in the community.in which they live.
In the given scenario Cathy has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren.
Releasing her will most likely lead to further abuse on the step children.
This was done to prevent further acts of violence from her.
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
Which of the following reasons best explains why Mistress Owens wants to adopt the mysterious baby?
Answer:
Mr. and Mrs. Owens adopt Bod because they were never able to have children of their own
Explanation:
It is in the passage if you read it closely.
Answer: C: Both A and B.
Explanation:
”We never had a child and his mother wants us to protect him. Will you say yes?” - Mistress Owens
I Promise it's worth a lot of points
Mock Trial
identify and summarize each of the following individual role.
plaintiff + defendant
lawyers
witnesses
judge
jury
Write a 1 To 2 Paragraph exploring what the conversation may have been while the jury was deliberating. what did they discuss? How did they reach a conclusion?
What is John’s designation? John has commanded his troops to defeat the attacking country’s army. He has also declared a national emergency. John is the _______ of the country.
Answer:
President
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in this scenario, the best guess would be that John is the President of the country in question. This is because ANY individual that acts on behalf of the government and has been granted special or extraordinary power by the government has the ability to declare a national emergency. Yet the President of the country is usually known as the commander of the armed forces and holds the highest rank when making decisions on attacking another country. Therefore John designation would be as President of the country.
If the plaintiff is seeking legal damages that are designed to punish the defendant and deter him and others from engaging in similar behavior in the future, the plaintiff is seeking ______________ damages.
Punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages, are a type of legal remedy designed to punish a defendant for egregious behavior and to deter both the defendant and others from engaging in similar behavior in the future.
Unlike compensatory damages, which are intended to make a plaintiff whole by compensating them for their losses, punitive damages are intended to punish and deter.
Punitive damages are usually awarded in addition to compensatory damages in cases where the defendant's behavior was particularly harmful or outrageous.
The amount of punitive damages awarded is often determined by the severity of the defendant's behavior and the amount necessary to deter future misconduct.
learn more about defendant here :
https://brainly.com/question/30736002
#SPJ11
Who is the Best Law Firm in Lahore?
Answer:
Legal Opinion Law Chambers is a law firm based in Lahore,which specializes in advising family laws i.e Divorce, Child Custody, Maintinance of Children, Recovery Of Dower(Haq Maher),Recovery Of Dowery Articles(Saman Jahez), Court Marriage, Succession Certificate, Legal Heirs Declaration, Civil laws, Criminal laws, as well as Property and Tax issues. Best Lawyers in Lahore especially For Family Laws.
The two 13-year-old girls are accused of stabbing a classmate with the intent of murdering her. According to the prosecutor, the girls planned the deed as a tribute to the fictional Slender Man, a paranormal creature who has supposedly been in existence for centuries. The girls found Slender Man on a Web site and decided to kill their friend to show devotion to the figure. Despite multiple stab wounds, the victim managed to crawl out of the woods where she had been abandoned. She was taken to a hospital and survived.
Was this crime an intentional murder (a homicide)? Should the two girls be charged as adults?
Answer:
yes it was a homicide and yes the two girls should be charged as adults.
Explanation:
I understand they listened to "Slenderman" but while the girls are getting charged they should seek to help their mental health . Because something could actually be wrong inside their heads. Even if it was someone telling them to do it , they still injured the female.Based on the given information, these activities is considered intentional murder, and the two girls will be charged as adults.
What is intentional murder?Intentional murder refers to an act of killing attempted by an individual in order to harm another person knowingly. unintentional murder is referred as harming another person mistakenly in self-defense.
In the given case, it is explained that The two 13-year-old girls are charged with purposefully attacking a classmate in order to kill her. The girls planned to murder their friend with respect to Slender Man after discovering him on a website.
The woman walked out of the woods where she had been placed despite having many stab wounds. Based on the woman's conditions and her statement the two girls are charged with homicide as they did the action in whole senses.
Learn more about intentional murder, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28460422
#SPJ2