megan goes to visit her friend kathleen. while visiting, megan downloads kathleen's copy of photoshop onto her computer's random access memory without kathleen's permission. megan is guilty of

Answer:

have green n fresh food with jungfood

Explanation:

will provide them what they need after that a strict rule n regulation n let them have a fresh surrounding .and let them hav lots of hot soup n let that have sunlight .

Controlling the muzzle of a pistol is important because of a. Because the barrel is short

Controlling the muzzle of a pistol is important for several reasons. First, pistols have short barrels which can make it difficult to accurately aim the firearm if the muzzle is not controlled properly. Second, the trigger pull of a pistol can be sensitive, so a firm grip on the muzzle is necessary to prevent accidental discharge.

Finally, unlike some other firearms, pistols may not have a safety mechanism, so it is crucial to have full control of the muzzle at all times to prevent injuries or accidents. Thus, the short barrel length, sensitive trigger pull, and lack of safety mechanism are required to be considered for controlling the muzzle of a pistol.

https://brainly.com/question/34616536

#SPJ2

Complete Question:

content loaded

Why is it important to take extra care controlling the muzzle of a pistol?

a. Because the barrel is short

b. Because the trigger pull is easy

c. Because it doesn't have a safety

d. Because the grip is limited

Answer:

1. Know a decision is needed

2. Consider the choices

3. Consider the consequences

4. Decide which choice is best

5. Evaluate your decision to know if it was a responsible.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Many scientific models have been established without "rigorous, controlled experiments to test the components of that model." In fact, the development of scientific models often begins with a hypothesis or a theoretical framework that is then refined and tested through observation and experimentation. As scientific understanding and technology improve, models are often revised or replaced by more accurate or comprehensive ones. Some examples of scientific models that were established without rigorous controlled experiments include the models of the atom, the theory of evolution, and the theory of plate tectonics.

PLS MARKME BRANLIEST

Some possible positive consequences of judicial activism include the ability to bring about much-needed social change in areas such as environmental protection and human and civil rights.

In addition, judicial activism can also serve to help keep the other branches of government in check and prevent them from abusing their power or overlooking the needs of the people they are supposed to represent. When judges have the ability to act as activists and make decisions that reflect the needs and interests of society as a whole, rather than just the needs and interests of individual parties, there is the potential for real and positive change to take place.

Finally, judicial activism can also serve as a much-needed check on the executive branch, which is often the most powerful branch of government.

To know more about  judicial activism go to

https://brainly.com/question/30035277

#SPJ4

Answer:

The correct answer is False.

Explanation:

According to Rule 1.5 of the American Bar Association caption "Fees". Under section A, subsection 7,

The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee can include "the years of experience, reputation, and skill of the lawyer or lawyers whose expertise have engaged.

Some of the other factors that determine the reasonableness of a lawyers fee are:

Cheers

Answer:

An administrative hearing can determine the following conditions of confinement:

- Hand and leg restraints when out of the cell

- Number of escorting officers.

It cannot determine the amount of food rations given or whether an inmate can attend recreation alone.

Roland and Deroine advocated for women's rights through direct political action. Rose, on the other hand, advocated for women's rights through education and persuasion. The perspectives of Roland, Deroine, and Rose were similar in that they all believed that women should have the same rights as men.

They founded the Society for the Rights of Women in 1848, and they ran for office themselves. They were also active in the press, writing articles and pamphlets about the need for women's suffrage and other reforms.

Rose, on the other hand, advocated for women's rights through education and persuasion. She founded the Association for the Advancement of Women in 1851, and she gave lectures and wrote articles about the need for women's education and economic independence.

The perspectives of Roland, Deroine, and Rose were similar in that they all believed that women should have the same rights as men. However, they differed in their strategies for achieving this goal.

Roland and Deroine believed that women could achieve equality through direct political action, while Rose believed that women could achieve equality through education and persuasion.

In conclusion, Roland, Deroine, and Rose were all important figures in the early women's rights movement. They each had their own unique perspective on how to achieve equality for women, and their work helped to pave the way for future generations of feminists.

To know more about women's rights, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32581245#

#SPJ11

Answer:

media content is shaped by economic and marketing considerations that override traditional journalistic criteria for news worthiness. This trend is apparent in local and national television's treatment of crime, in which the extent and style of news stories about crime are adjusted to meet perceived   and advertising strategies, which frequently emphasize particular demographic groups with a taste for violence. In the case of local television news, this trend results in virtually all channels devoting a disproportionate part of their broadcast to violent crimes, and to many channels adopting a fast-paced, high-crime strategy based on an entertainment model. In the case of network news, this strategy results in much greater coverage of crime,especially murder, with a heavy emphasis on long-running, tabloid style treatment of selected cases in both evening news and news magazines.  researchers concluded that the media portrayals of the justice system had changed over the century (1890-1990). They also drew the conclusion that the mass media serves as gatekeepers for coverage on the corrections process through the news as well as prime-time TV shows, which blur the line of fiction and reality.

Explanation:

Lowering interest rates may boost the economy, but it can also lead to worsened inflation and an increase in the trade deficit.

Lowering interest rates can stimulate borrowing and spending, which in turn can boost economic activity and encourage investment. However, this expansionary monetary policy can also increase inflationary pressures in the economy.

When interest rates are low, consumers and businesses tend to borrow more, increasing demand for goods and services. This increased demand can push up prices, leading to higher inflation. Additionally, lowering interest rates can make domestic investments less attractive relative to foreign investments, potentially leading to an increase in the trade deficit as imports become more appealing.

Therefore, while lowering interest rates can have positive effects on the economy, policymakers need to carefully consider the potential negative consequences, such as inflation and trade imbalances.

Learn more about inflation https://brainly.com/question/28083534

#SPJ11

Answer:

yes I do think washington should be a state

Explanation:

I say this because there are a total of 50 states and if we take washington out it would be 49 and it doesnt make any sense to take washington out

The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.

Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:

https://brainly.com/question/1172086

#SPJ11

True, a U.S. trustee is a federal government official who has the responsibility for handling and supervising many of the administrative tasks associated with a bankruptcy case.

What is bankruptcy? Bankruptcy is a legal process designed to help people and companies get relief from their debts while paying creditors what they can. There are two types of bankruptcy: liquidation bankruptcy, also known as Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and reorganization bankruptcy, also known as Chapter 13 bankruptcy.What is a U.S. trustee?A U.S. trustee is a federal government official who has the responsibility for handling and supervising many of the administrative tasks associated with a bankruptcy case.

They play a critical role in the bankruptcy process by ensuring the integrity of the bankruptcy system, making sure that everyone involved in the process follows the rules, and making sure that the rights of both debtors and creditors are protected.

to know more about government visit
https://brainly.com/question/33634787
#SPJ11

Answer:

Ethics is important because law enforcement is placed in a position of authority.

Explanation:

Answer:

D.) Gabriel Tarde

Explanation:

He was a criminologist and social psychologist

Answer:

It is C, Hans Eysenck.

Explanation:

I put Gabriel Tarde and got it wrong. So person above me is wrong.

The state bar number in California is a unique identifier assigned to an attorney who is licensed to practice law in the state. It is a critical component of the California State Bar, which is the state agency responsible for regulating the legal profession in California.

In order to obtain a state bar number in California, an attorney must pass the California Bar Exam and be admitted to the California State Bar. Once admitted, the attorney is assigned a state bar number, which is recorded in the California State Bar's database and is used to identify the attorney in all professional activities.

The state bar number is a crucial tool for the California State Bar in ensuring that the legal profession is regulated and that the public is protected from unethical or unprofessional attorneys.

Attorneys are required to include their state bar number on all legal documents and communications, which helps to ensure that the public can easily verify an attorney's credentials and disciplinary history.

For more about  state bar number refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14661666#

#SPJ11

The number on the given map that shows the location of Florida in the United States is 1.

Florida is located to the South-Eastern part of the United States where it is a peninsula that extends downwards.

It is located above Cuba which is labeled as 2 which means that Florida is denoted by the number, 1.

Find out more on Florida at https://brainly.com/question/6590614.

#SPJ1

The idea of America, with its emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, informed both the politics of the American Revolution and the text of the Declaration of Independence.

The idea of America was based on the principles of individual liberty and natural rights, which were central to the political philosophy of the Enlightenment. The American Revolution was fueled by the belief that the British government was violating these principles and denying the colonists their rights as British citizens.

The Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson, reflects the idea of America and the political philosophy of the Enlightenment. It states that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

These ideas were radical for their time and challenged the traditional notion of the divine right of kings and the power of monarchs.

The idea of America continued to inform American politics after the Revolution, with the adoption of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These documents enshrined the principles of individual liberty and natural rights into the American system of government and continue to shape American politics and society today.

The complete question is:

How does the idea of America inform both the politics of the revolution and the text of the Declaration of Independence

To know more about  individual rights, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14316517#
#SPJ11

Pretending to be a financial institution in order to get individuals to reveal their personal information is called phishing.

Hence, the correct option is A.

When someone steals your personal information to commit fraud, it is known as identity theft (ID theft). A method wherein the perpetrator poses as a reliable person or legitimate company in order to solicit sensitive information, such as bank account numbers, through email or website fraud is called phishing. It is punishable under law. Phishing is a type of cybercrime that uses phony emails, websites, and texts to steal sensitive personal and business data. In order to obtain personal information from the victims, such as their credit card information, phone number, mailing address, company information, etc., they use deception.

Know more about "phishing" visit

brainly.com/question/24156548

#SPJ4

Surety bonds are a type of financial agreement between three parties: the principal (the party who is required to perform a certain obligation), the oblige (the party who is protected by the bond), and the surety (the party who guarantees the principal's performance to the obligee). Surety bonds are commonly used in the construction industry to ensure that contractors fulfill their obligations under a contract.

Option C correctly describes surety bonds as it protects companies from contractors that fail to fulfill a contract. In such cases, the surety will step in and fulfill the contractor's obligations, up to the amount of the bond. This ensures that the obligee is not left with unfinished work and financial losses.
Option A is incorrect as it describes a marine insurance policy that covers loss related to watercraft. Option B is also incorrect as it describes health insurance policies that pay for medical expenses and illnesses.

In summary, surety bonds are a form of financial guarantee that protect obligees from financial loss if the principal fails to fulfill their contractual obligations. They are commonly used in the construction industry but can also be used in other industries where financial guarantees are required.

To know more about Surety bonds visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30331400

#SPJ11

The statement that a party may ask the judge to rule in their favor after pleadings are filed and discovery is completed is false.

After pleadings are filed and discovery is completed, a party may ask the judge to rule in their favor. The statement is false. A party cannot ask a judge to rule in their favor after pleadings are filed and discovery is completed. The correct time to do so is after the trial.

In the court of law, pleadings refer to the formal written documents filed by parties in a lawsuit. It sets out their allegations, claims, and defenses. Pleadings generally consist of a complaint, answer, counterclaim, and reply. Discovery, on the other hand, is the formal process of exchanging information between the parties involved in a lawsuit. Discovery is used to obtain evidence from the opposing party, and it can be done through depositions, written interrogatories, and document production.

After pleadings are filed and discovery is completed, parties in a lawsuit engage in pretrial motions, conferences, and negotiations. At the end of the pretrial process, a trial date is scheduled. The trial is the appropriate time to ask the judge to rule in a party's favor. The party presents their evidence, and the judge or jury decides the case. Therefore, the statement that a party may ask the judge to rule in their favor after pleadings are filed and discovery is completed is false.

For more such question on judge

https://brainly.com/question/28452554

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.

While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.

However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.

Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:

1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.

2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.

3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.

On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:

1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.

2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.

3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.

The first important positivist theory to emerge was the theory of the "criminal man" by Cesare Lombroso.

Cesare Lombroso was an Italian criminologist and physician who lived from 1835 to 1909. He is often considered the founder of modern criminology due to his pioneering research into the relationship between criminal behavior and physical traits. Lombroso believed that criminals were "born" rather than made and that they exhibited physical and mental characteristics that set them apart from non-criminals.

He referred to these characteristics as "atavistic," meaning that they were throwbacks to earlier stages of human evolution. Lombroso's theories were controversial in his time and have been criticized for their scientific rigor and ethical implications. However, his work had a significant impact on the field of criminology and helped to shape the way that we think about the causes of criminal behavior.

To learn more about Cesare Lombroso visit here:

brainly.com/question/6805457

#SPJ4

The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

Answer:

lsd

Explanation:

If someone uses a credit card only once, then only ever pays the minimum payment, They will pay it off eventually, but have higher interest payments.  Option C

Generally, The cost of borrowing money is represented by interest payments. In addition to paying back the principal on a loan, the borrower is responsible for making these additional payments.

When you lend money to someone with the expectation of receiving interest in return, the amount of money you receive in addition to the principal sum you lent is referred to as the interest payment.

If you merely make the required minimum payment on your credit card each month, you may have more money in your pocket at the end of each month; nevertheless, the total amount that you will have paid off will be far more than your initial balance. In addition, if you merely make the minimum payment each month, you will be in debt for a much longer period of time.

Read more about interest payments.

https://brainly.com/question/2591679

#SPJ1

The purpose of a grand jury is to ascertain if there is reason to think that one or more people committed a specific Federal offense within the district court's jurisdiction.

A grand jury's role is to accuse those who may be guilty of a crime, but it also serves as a safeguard against unfair and unjust prosecution. It provides an opportunity for community members to engage in the administration of justice as lay citizens. Additionally, it has the ability to show data on local crime and poor administration. A grand jury typically consists of 23 people.

Two different forms of written statements are used as the accusation method: Either in a formal manner (indictment) outlining the offense with the appropriate accompaniments of time and occasion, the certainty of deed and person, or in a less formal manner (presentment), which is typically the grand jury's spontaneous act.

Learn more about grand jury, here;

https://brainly.com/question/1927043

#SPJ6

Answer: guilty vedect