many days _______ lefose we meet agains (pass)
Answers
Answer:
are is in the blank______
Explanation:
please follow me
Related Questions
Which strategy would be most appropriate for a reader who wants to retell important parts of the text without having to worry about using proper grammar?annotatingfreewritingquestioningrereading.
Answers
Rereading strategy would be most appropriate for a reader who wishes to highlight key passages in the text without having to worry about utilizing perfect language.
How should I read retellings?In reading, the recounting technique is frequently employed. After reading a work, students engage in oral or written retellings to deepen their understanding of the plot points. Students can use a pictorial stroll through the story to help them with their retellings as they are reading.
What is a narrative retelling in writing?The story's elements are the same in its written and oral retellings. An illustration of an anchor chart that could be used in the classroom to teach pupils about storytelling is shown in the image above.
To learn more about Rereading strategy here:
https://brainly.com/question/28014573
#SPJ4
Read the excerpt from Martin Luther King Jr.’s "I Have A Dream” speech.
We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.
King’s use of repetition in the excerpt stresses his.
A. Desire for Political Power.
B. Deep Religious Faith.
C. Plea for Peaceful Action.
D. Physical Strength.
Answers
Answer:
C. Plea for Peaceful Action.
Explanation:
Seems like it should be the correct one, as he is not looking for political power, using deep religious faith, or physical strength.
Select all the correct answers.
Which statements are true for summarizing information? Select all that apply.
Keep the original meaning of the text.
Include opposing views.
Use words directly from the text.
Do not include opinions.
Reset
Next
Answers
Answer:
The correct answers are:
Keep the original meaning of the text.Use words directly from the text.Do not include opinions.Select all the correct answers.Which statements are true for summarizing information? Select all that apply.Keep the original meaning of the text.Include opposing views.Use words directly from the text.Do not include opinions.ResetNext
Answer:
Do not include opinions, Keep the original meaning of the text.
Explanation:
:)
Do violent video games make people more likely to be violent in real life?
Answers
this is a no red ink question, pls help!
Answers
Answer:
Hi there! This is a long-form work. The titles of long-form works are italicized, while the titles of short-form works are surrounded by quotation marks.
In 7.6 you read a selection from Pascal’s "The Wager", in which he gives an argument for the claim that it is rational to believe in God even if we do not have evidence that God exists. (a) Explain Pascal’s argument and then (b) explain an objection to Pascal’s argument. In this section, we looked at the famous philosopher Blaise Pascal and his arguments and proofs in his pragmatism style of debate. Pascal's idea was that from a mathematical standpoint it would be the best option to believe in God and follow his practices. He explained that regardless of intervention, people will always believe in their own set of beliefs, even if said person has no way of rationalizing those beliefs. He also stated that if one event happens repeatedly or even constantly the results will always be the same; therefore if you were to only change one variable the following result should likely be rather close to the original ending. Pascal used this logic to say that if someone is to believe in God and he ends up not existing, you wouldn’t lose much, however, if you chose to not believe in God and he does exist you risk facing a worse fate than you originally thought. However, some people did not agree with this logic and in fact, carried this logic further. Other philosophers said that if we continue the pattern what if there were two gods? What if you believed in the wrong God?
Answers
Blaise Pascal's argument for the claim that it is rational to believe in God even if we do not have evidence that God exists is called Pascal’s Wager. According to Pascal, it is rational to believe in God even when there is no evidence of his existence. Pascal's idea is that from a mathematical standpoint, it would be the best option to believe in God and follow his practices.
He explained that regardless of intervention, people will always believe in their own set of beliefs, even if the person has no way of rationalizing those beliefs. He further stated that if one event happens repeatedly or constantly, the result will always be the same; therefore, if you were to only change one variable, the following result should likely be rather close to the original ending. Pascal used this logic to argue that if someone believes in God, and he ends up not existing, the loss wouldn't be much.
However, if one chooses to not believe in God, and he does exist, one risks facing a worse fate than one originally thought. Pascal’s argument was made in response to the argument of atheists who think that there is no need to believe in God because there is no evidence for God's existence. The objection to Pascal’s argument is that it is a false dichotomy or a false choice. It is not always the case that we have to choose between believing in God and not believing in God. Some people don’t believe in God because they are not convinced by the arguments for God’s existence.
Others don’t believe in God because they think that belief in God is not necessary for a meaningful life. Moreover, Pascal's argument doesn't help us to decide which religion is true, what religion we should follow, or which conception of God is correct. It only tells us to believe in God, without giving any guidance on which God we should believe in or how we should worship him.
To know more about argument visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28689383
#SPJ11
Someone pls help with this question!!! Thank you!! Ill give brainiest!!!
In the press pack for the film, author Suzanne Collins is quoted as saying: “Not all the characters are going to make it to the screen...it was hard to let them go but I don’t think that the choices damaged the emotional arc of the story.”
■ What do you understand by this statement? What conclusions might you draw about the author’s view of the film version?
Answers
The phrase " Not all the characters are going to make it to the screen" simply means that not everyone that took part in the rehearsal will take part in the main event.
What is character?In literature, a character simply means the person, animal, or figure in a literary work.
In this case, the phrase " Not all the characters are going to make it to the screen" simply means that not everyone that took part in the rehearsal will take part in the main event.
Learn more about characters on:
https://brainly.com/question/8864308
Help thank you this is text message analysis
Answers
what happened before this conversation took place?
axel's friend was asked to say or do something mean to their friend
evidence: "im not going to be mean to people just to impress someone else"
What does napoleon think in animal farm? (weird question, i know. ask my teacher) only answer if u know the answer, thank u:)
Answers
Hoped I was able to help! Mark me brainly if I helped ! It would help me a lot!:)
Read this passage from “The Raven.” What is the chronological order of the events?
Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary, Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore— While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping, As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door. “’Tis some visitor,” I muttered, “tapping at my chamber door— Only this and nothing more.” Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December; And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor. Eagerly I wished the morrow;—vainly I had sought to borrow From my books surcease of sorrow—sorrow for the lost Lenore— For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore— Nameless here for evermore.
A. The speaker tells us about the visit of a raven, the speaker hears a tapping, the speaker reads on a December night, Lenore dies
B. Lenore dies, the speaker tells us about the visit of a raven, the speaker hears a tapping, the speaker reads on a December night
C. The speaker reads on a December night, the speaker tells us about the visit of a raven, Lenore dies, the speaker hears a tapping
D. Lenore dies, the speaker reads on a December night, the speaker hears a tapping, the speaker tells us about the visit of a raven
Answers
Answer:
A. The speaker tells us about the visit of a raven, the speaker hears a tapping, the speaker reads on a December night, Lenore dies.
Hope it helps!
Which sentence uses precise, persuasive language? Everyone thought the speech she gave was very nice. Leo is a creative and inspiring class president. My brother would make a better president than she would. The play we saw last week was really interesting.
Answers
Answer:
Leo is a creative and inspiring class president.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
How does Lizabeth feel after taunting Miss Lottie?
A.)conflicted
B.)regretful
С.)amused
D.)proud
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
When Lizabeth sees Miss Lottie standing in front of her, she realizes that destroying someone else's joy does not make her feel better.
Answer:
A conflicted
Explanation:
How do you explain ‘Dearness Allowance’ and ‘Gratuity’?
Answers
Identify if the sentence is active or passive.
The puppies chased the birds for hours.
ACTIVE
OR
PASSIVE
Rewrite it in the opposite voice below:
Answers
Answer:
Passive
Explanation:
The puppies "chased" is a passive verb.
The puppies are chasing the birds.
explain the relationship between confustion and growth in the text cite evidence from the text to support your response
Answers
Answer:
we need the text
Explanation:
a stew cooked by simmering and served in a white sauce is a
Answers
A stew cooked by simmering and served in a white sauce is a fricassee.
What is a fricassee?A fricassee is a French dish made by simmering meat in a white sauce and typically served with vegetables.
Meat that has been sautéed in butter before being simmered in white wine or stock is typically used for the dish's foundation. Onions, garlic, and a variety of other seasonings are common in the recipe.
The meat is then simmered in a sauce thickened with egg yolks and heavy cream until it is fully cooked, soft, and falls apart quickly.
Learn more about simmering meat at:
https://brainly.com/question/31003258
#SPJ11
A stew cooked by simmering and served in a white sauce is a Blanquette. Blanchette is a French stew in which meat (typically lamb or veal) is slowly simmered in a light-colored sauce that is thickened with a roux and finished with cream.
It is a delicate dish that is flavored with onions, carrots, and mushrooms, and is often garnished with pearl onions and parsley. Blanquette gets its name from the fact that the meat is blanched (briefly boiled) before being added to the stew, which gives it a light, delicate flavor and tender texture.Blanchette is a classic French dish that is known for its mild flavor and creamy texture. It is typically served with rice, noodles, or boiled potatoes, and is often accompanied by a side salad or other vegetable. It is a popular dish in many French households and is also frequently served in French restaurants.
To know more about classic French dish visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11842648
#SPJ11
Select the best answer for the question. 18. Graphic designers working on two-dimensional objects must remember the important standard of A. visual unity. B. contrast. C. alignment. D. figure/ground.
Answers
The best answer for the question is:
C. alignment.
When working on two-dimensional objects, graphic designers must consider the important standard of alignment.
Alignment refers to the arrangement and positioning of elements, such as text, images, and shapes, in a design. Proper alignment helps create a visually pleasing and organized composition. It ensures that elements are positioned correctly, maintaining balance and coherence in the overall design.
In reality, there are roughly a dozen basic principles of design that beginning and expert designers alike should keep in mind when working on their projects. In addition, there are another dozen or so “secondary” design principles that are sometimes included as basics (for example, the Gestalt Principles, typography, color, and framing). The main design principles are explained and illustrated below. As already mentioned, there is no real consensus in the design community about what the main principles of design actually are.
That said, the following twelve principles of visual design are those mentioned most often in articles and books on the subject.
To know more about alignment visit
https://brainly.com/question/26004740
#SPJ11
Read the sentences. [1] olaudah equiano wrote a book. [2] it was about his experiences as a slave and, later, as a free man. Which is the best way to combine sentences 1 and 2?.
Answers
The best way to combine sentences 1 and 2 from the narration about the experience of Olaudah Equiano is:
Olaudah Equiano wrote a book, which was about his experiences as a slave and, later, as a free man. the correct answer is A
The first sentence most clearly connects the ideas contained in the two sentences.
As Olauda Equiano took her experience as a slave and her experience as an independent individual to write a book, it connects them through the coordinating conjunction 'and' and serves to give equal meaning to the two ideas. increase.
The relative clause "who free man" further helps the reader to clearly see and understand the main point of the sentence.
your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was
Read the sentences.
[1] Olaudah Equiano wrote a book. [2] It was about his experiences as a slave and, later, as a free man.
Which is the best way to combine sentences 1 and 2?
a. Olaudah Equiano wrote a book, which was about his experiences as a slave and, later, as a free man.
b.Olaudah Equiano wrote a book, even if it was about his experiences as a slave and, later, as a free man.
c. Olaudah Equiano wrote a book, until it was about his experiences as a slave and, later, as a free man.
d. Olaudah Equiano wrote a book, although it was about his experiences as a slave and, later, as a free man.
Learn more about combining sentences here:
brainly.com/question/5359126
#SPJ4
which of the following best describes what the speaker sees in "days ahead"
A. The fall of America
B. The rebuilding of America
C. A positive change in America
D. A change in America's physical landscape
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to Chapter 5, select three choices below that best complete this sentence:
Using and citing sources ...
advances the scholarly conversation
is rare in original research
relies on public domain status
helps prevent plagiarism
builds off of the work of others
Answers
According to Chapter 5, three choices that best complete the sentence "Using and citing sources..." are: Advances the scholarly conversation, Helps prevent plagiarism, Builds off of the work of others.
Using and citing sources is important in research because it builds off of the work of others, advances the scholarly conversation, and helps prevent plagiarism. When conducting research, it is crucial to consult and evaluate credible sources to support one's arguments and ideas. Citing these sources appropriately not only gives credit to the original authors but also helps readers locate the information and verify its accuracy. By using and citing sources, researchers can avoid plagiarism and maintain academic integrity. Additionally, citing sources can help to advance the scholarly conversation by acknowledging previous research and allowing for further analysis and discussion. Therefore, using and citing sources is an essential part of the research process that promotes accuracy, credibility, and advancement in scholarly fields.
learn more about plagiarism here
https://brainly.com/question/30180097
#SPJ11
Question
The authors of both passages probably would agree that
O certain groups of people should start paying higher taxes
O tax increases have a direct effect on the economy
O new technologies help only those who invent them
O spending money does not help the economy very much
Answers
The authors of both passages probably would agree that spending money does not help the economy very much. Option D is correct answer.
The other options are not necessarily the shared views of the authors as there could be debates on each of them, especially the assertion that certain groups of people should start paying higher taxes. Tax increases have a direct effect on the economy is a debatable issue as the actual effect it has on the economy could vary depending on the context. New technologies help only those who invent them is another controversial issue as technological advancements can lead to better productivity and hence better economic growth even for consumers who didn't invent the technology. In summary, the shared view of the authors is that spending money does not help the economy very much.
The correct option is D.
For more question economy
https://brainly.com/question/28210218
#SPJ8
You often see Sarah. A friend of yours wants to contact her. Which do you say?A.If I see Sarah, I'll tell her to call you.B.If I saw Sarah, I'd tell her to call you.C.If I saw Sarah, I will tell her to call you.D.If I see Sarah, I would tell her to call you.
Answers
The appropriate response would be If I see Sarah, I'll tell her to call you. The first conditional form, which is used to represent a potential future action based on a certain circumstance, is employed in this sentence. Hence option A is correct.
"If I see Sarah" is the condition in this instance. I'll, a contraction of "I will," denotes the speaker's readiness or intention to instruct Sarah to phone the buddy. This remark suggests that the speaker is willing to share the information if they run into Sarah again in the future.
To know more about conditional form
https://brainly.com/question/30277615
#SPJ12
29. Events C and D are known to be strongly positively correlated. The following causation statements have been made Although events C and D are correlated this does not indicate direct causation as (1) Event C could cause event D to occur only when event E occurs (2) Events C and D could both be caused by event F Which of the following is correct as regards these statements: A. Both statements are true B. Both statements are untrue C. Statement 1 only is true D. Statement 2 only is true
Answers
Option C) Statement 1 only is true is correct as regards these statements. Given that events C and D are known to be strongly positively correlated. Let's understand positive correlation first before moving to the causation statements.
A positive correlation is a connection between two variables that indicates that when one variable increases, the other variable tends to rise as well. In this scenario, a strong positive correlation indicates that as one variable increases, so does the other. Conversely, if one variable decreases, the other decreases as well.
Causation Statements made:Although events C and D are correlated, this does not indicate direct causation as (1) Event C could cause event D to occur only when event E occurs (2) Events C and D could both be caused by event F.Statement 1: Event C could cause event D to occur only when event E occurs. This statement is true as there might be a third variable, E that might affect the relationship between C and D. It's impossible to determine if C causes D without more knowledge about the situation and a detailed study on the relationship between the variables.Statement 2: Events C and D could both be caused by event F. This statement is incorrect as it doesn't take into account the fact that C and D are strongly positively correlated. If event F causes both C and D to happen simultaneously, then there is a direct correlation between them. Hence, only statement 1 is true.
To learn more about positive correlation here
https://brainly.com/question/28898177
#SPJ11
In the poem, "In Spite of War," what does the speaker mean by "a glory liveth through despair"?Question 1 options:that people become more glorious through hardshipthat war helps people achieve glorythat despair can make people strongerthat life goes on even when bad things happen
Answers
In the poem, "In Spite of War," the speaker mean by "a glory Livet through despair" that life goes on even when bad things happen. So the option D is correct.
The speaker is saying that even when there is war, or despair, there can still be a beauty and greatness that can come from it. Even though bad things happen, there is still a sense of hope and beauty that can come from it. This idea is expressed in the line, "A glory liveth through despair."
This line suggests that even in moments of despair and darkness, there is still a glimmer of hope and light that can be found and held onto. It implies that we can still find a source of strength and courage to carry on despite our struggles and adversities. So the option D is correct.
To learn more about In Spite of War link is here
brainly.com/question/20427791
#SPJ4
Read the summary of the first three paragraphs of "The World On Turtle’s Back. " [1] In the beginning, there was no land, only the great ocean. [2] The Sky-World, the home of the gods, was above the ocean. [3] A sacred tree stood at the center. [4] One of the gods pulled out some of its roots for his pregnant wife. [5] This created a hole in the floor of the Sky-World. [6] The man's wife fell through the hole toward the ocean below, clutching the roots in her hand. Which is the best way to combine sentences 4 and 5? One of the gods pulled out some of its roots for his pregnant wife, which created a hole in the floor of the Sky-World. One of the gods pulled out some of its roots for his pregnant wife, he created a hole in the floor of the Sky-World. One of the gods pulled out some of its roots for his pregnant wife which created a hole in the floor of the Sky-World. One of the gods pulled out some of its roots for his pregnant wife he created a hole in the floor of the Sky-World.
Answers
The best way to combine sentences 4 and 5 is: "One of the gods pulled out some of its roots for his pregnant wife, which created a hole in the floor of the Sky-World."
The suggested combination maintains the logical sequence of events and provides clarity in understanding the cause and effect relationship between the actions of the god and the creation of the hole in the floor. By using the conjunction "which," the sentence connects the action of pulling out the roots to the consequence of creating a hole in the floor of the Sky-World. The word "which" acts as a relative pronoun, introducing a subordinate clause that provides additional information about the main clause. In this case, it clarifies the cause-and-effect relationship between the god pulling out the roots and the resulting creation of a hole in the floor. The use of "which" helps to make the sentence more concise and coherent, allowing readers to easily follow the narrative progression of events.
Learn more about conjunction here:
https://brainly.com/question/31636701
#SPJ11
Answer:
A
Explanation:
EDGE23
what information does mary warren tell the proctors about the trial? what is her new role in the trial?
Answers
Elizabeth receives a poppet that Mary Warren crafted while she was in court. Elizabeth and Proctor are informed by Mary Warren that Goody Osburn will be executed since she refused to confess to being a witch while 39 people are now incarcerated. Proctor is upset because he feels the court is passing judgement on people without sufficient justification.
Everyone is turning on one another, and there are now twice as many people being accused of crimes and locked up. After Abigail was fired, Mary is now the Proctors' servant. She is a weak person who enjoys drama and is prone to hysteria. She alternates between the Proctors and the group of lying girls, drawn to the girls yet aware of the Proctors' innocence.
To learn more on proctors trial
https://brainly.com/question/4260933
#SPJ4
which kind of adaptation attempts to re-create the literary source in filmic terms while keeping as close to the spirit of the original as possible?
Answers
A faithful adaptation attempts to re-create the literary source in filmic terms while keeping as close to the spirit of the original as possible.
This entails faithfully adapting the story, the characters, and the themes of the original book into a visual medium while also coming up with inventive ways to do so.
Filmmakers must maintain integrity to the source material while also contributing their own distinctive perspective to the adaptation, which calls for a careful balance between accuracy and creativity.
In order to make sure the adaptation is both accurate to the source material and approachable to a wider audience, this approach frequently entails extensive research and collaboration between the filmmakers and the original authors.
To learn more about adaptation link is here
brainly.com/question/28881538
#SPJ4
What happens when the pigs try to teach the other animals to read?
Answers
They do make an effort to teach some other animals the fundamentals of writing and reading but the pigs end up being the only ones who can properly defend and understand Animal Farm's tenets.
What would you say is reading?Making sense of written words is reading. It calls for us to: Recognize the words in print, a process known as word recognition. build a knowledge from them—this is the comprehension process. To make reading automatic, coordinate word recognition with meaning creation.
How do reading skills work?The ability to read, understand, interpret, and interpret written language & texts is referred to as reading skills. Excellent reading abilities are very helpful for understanding and responding to handwritten letters like emails, messages, letters, and other written statements.
To know more about reading visit:
brainly.com/question/15315297
#SPJ4
maggie has written an essay that is going to be published in a peer-reviewed journal. she struggles with proofreading her own material because her mind tends to wander when she reads her essays aloud to herself. what is another type of proofreading strategy that maggie could use?
Answers
Maggie could also read her essay backward as a proofreading technique. How to Spelling and Grammar Check an Essay.
Proofreading is a repetitive process of equating trireme proofs against the original manuscripts or clear artworks to identify copy wrongs in the publication process. The main purpose of copy editing searches is to boost the quality of the paper, guarantee skilled are no chronic mistakes and adjust statement discourse mistakes or writing discrepancies. Essentially, you be going to confirm you have a clear idea aim.
Writing is the most active habit of communicating your research plans and results. The character of the paper stating beliefs decreases if it is filled with accompanying orthography, pause, and linguistic mistakes. These wrongs undermine the believability of your research work.
To know more about Proofreading refer to: https://brainly.com/question/883047
#SPJ4
results of strohner and nelson 1924
Answers
In 1924, a study was conducted by Strohner and Nelson to investigate the relationship between the rate of learning and the method of teaching.
The study involved two groups of students who were taught the same material but using different methods. One group was taught using a method that involved reading and memorization, while the other group was taught using a method that involved problem-solving and application of the material. The results of the study showed that the group taught using the problem-solving method performed better than the group taught using the reading and memorization method. The students who were taught using the problem-solving method were able to retain the information better and apply it to new situations, while the other group struggled to apply the information they had learned.
The findings of the study have had a significant impact on education and have led to the development of more interactive and engaging teaching methods that emphasize problem-solving and critical thinking. Today, educators continue to explore new teaching methods and strategies to enhance learning outcomes for students.
Overall, the Strohner and Nelson study demonstrated the importance of teaching methods in promoting effective learning and highlighted the benefits of problem-solving approaches.
To know more about problem-solving:
https://brainly.com/question/31606357
#SPJ11