Major aspects of President Wilson's Fourteen Points included the promotion of open diplomacy, free trade, disarmament, and the establishment of a League of Nations.
1. Open diplomacy: Wilson believed that transparency in international affairs would help prevent conflicts. He called for an end to secret treaties and agreements between nations, advocating for open communication and the publication of all diplomatic discussions.
2. Free trade: Wilson's second point emphasized the importance of free trade between nations. He believed that reducing trade barriers would promote economic cooperation and peace. By allowing countries to trade openly and freely, Wilson hoped to reduce competition for resources and foster goodwill among nations.
3. Disarmament: Recognizing the role of military buildup in the escalation of World War I, Wilson called for disarmament in his third point. He argued that reducing military spending and the size of armed forces would make war less likely and free up resources for domestic development and international aid.
4. Self-determination: Wilson emphasized the right of people to choose their own government in his fifth point. He argued that respecting the nationalities and aspirations of various ethnic groups would help prevent conflict and promote peace.
5. League of Nations: The final and most significant point was the establishment of a League of Nations, an international organization designed to prevent future wars by providing a platform for diplomacy and conflict resolution. The League would facilitate cooperation among nations and promote collective security through a system of mutual defense.
In summary, President Wilson's Fourteen Points were aimed at promoting peace, cooperation, and diplomacy among nations. Key aspects included open diplomacy, free trade, disarmament, self-determination, and the establishment of a League of Nations.
To learn more about Wilson's Fourteen Points refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/21501441
#SPJ11
There were several significant components in President Wilson's Fourteen Points. These included a request for free navigation of the seas, a reduction in military spending, a reassessment of colonial claims, and the founding of the League of Nations.
In order to foster peace and stability in the years following World War I and to avert future wars, the Fourteen Points were established. In order to accomplish this, according to President Wilson, the League of Nations would be a crucial weapon. All things considered, the Fourteen Points signified a dramatic break from conventional diplomacy and heralded a new era in world affairs.
learn more about president wilson's fourteen points here
https://brainly.com/question/12108986
#SPJ11
When changing lanes, the acronym describing the correct procedure is as follows:
A. SMOG - Signal, Mirror, Over the Shoulder and Go
B. SCAT - Signal, Check, Accelerate and Turn
C. SMAT - Signal, Mirror, Accelerate and Turn
OD. STAM - Signal, Turn, Accelerate and Mirror
Answer: The answer is A
Explanation:
general principles of insurance law
Answer:
almost good faith
insurable interest
contribution
Explanation:
please follow me
how can class evidence become individual evidence.
Answer:
Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source. The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic.
Explanation:
I hope it helps you
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000 television in New Hampshire? O $6 O $16 O $60 O $600
Answer:
$60
Explanation:
6 percent of 1,000 is 60
Based on the tax in both states, the amount that you would save is $60.
Purchase price of television in Massachusetts= Purchase price x ( 1 + sales tax)
= 1,000 x ( 1 + 6%)
= $1,060
Difference between price in both states.= Price in Massachusetts - Price in New Hampshire
= 1,060 - 1,000
= $60
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on sales tax at https://brainly.com/question/9437038.
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
Which one of the following disciplines is related to criminology?
a. Sociology b. Economics c. Political science d. all of these
Roger Boisjoly provided a Presidential commission with documents supporting his hypothesis about how the cold temperature had causes the failure of an O-ring on the Space Shuttle Challenger. For this action, Boisjoly was labeled aHeroGood SamaritanWhistleblower
An O-ring seal that malfunctioned due to the exceptionally cold circumstances was to blame for the catastrophe.
How weather caused the loss of the Space Shuttle Challenger?O-ring seal malfunctioned during the exceptionally cold temperatures, which led to the catastrophe. The low temperature behind a powerful cold front was a chilly 26 degrees, far lower than the typical low temperature of 50 degrees. The previous evening, preparations were conducted to stop or lessen the production of ice.
The commission came to the conclusion that the Challenger accident's immediate cause was a failure in the O-rings sealing the aft field joint on the right solid rocket booster, which allowed pressurized hot gases and eventually flame to "blow by" the O-ring and come into contact with the nearby external tank, leading to structural failure.
To learn more about Space Shuttle Challenger refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27078190
#SPJ4
If the federal government receives $3 trillion in tax revenue over the course of one year but spends only $2 trillion, it means the government has a ______________ for the year
Answer:
Explanation:
If the federal government receives $3 trillion in tax revenue over the course of one year but spends only $2 trillion, it means the government has a budget surplus for the year. A budget surplus occurs when the government's revenue exceeds its expenses, which can be used to pay down debt, invest in infrastructure or public services, or returned to taxpayers through tax cuts or rebates.
The government uses population information for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:
A.
to declare war
B.
to plan for the future
C.
to meet citizens’ needs
D.
Importance of the right to life
Discuss with reference to the position of the local councils in Clarence City Council v Commonwealth of Australia [10.70].
In what sense does Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNeice Bros Pty Ltd [10.100] allow a third party to enforce a benefit from a contract to which they are not privy?
Local councils in Clarence City Council v Commonwealth of Australia [10.70] held a limited position, while Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNeice Bros Pty Ltd [10.100] allowed a third party to enforce a benefit from a contract to which they are not privy.
Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNeice Bros Pty Ltd [10.100] establishes the principle of third-party enforcement of contract benefits. In this case, a contract was entered into between Trident General Insurance Co Ltd and McNeice Bros Pty Ltd. However, a third party, who was not a party to the contract, sought to enforce a benefit from that contract. The court held that the third party could enforce the benefit if it was clear that the contract intended to confer a benefit on the third party.
This principle allows a third party to step into the shoes of one of the contracting parties and enforce the benefit owed to them. It recognizes that there may be situations where a contract confers a benefit on a third party, and it would be unjust to deny them the right to enforce that benefit. The key factor is the intention of the contracting parties, as evidenced by the terms of the contract.
In the context of local councils in Clarence City Council v Commonwealth of Australia [10.70], their position was limited. This case dealt with the issue of constitutional validity and the scope of legislative powers. The court held that local councils are subordinate to the legislative authority of the Commonwealth and the states, and their powers are derived from legislation. They do not possess inherent or implied powers unless expressly granted by legislation.
Learn more about councils
brainly.com/question/21283838
#SPJ11
In which case did the Court rule that the level of evidence for the finding of juvenile delinquency is proof beyond a reasonable doubt?
a. Breed v. Jones (1975)
b. Fare v. Michael C. (1979)
c. New Jersey v. Martin Township Correctional Facility (1977)
d. In re Gault (1967)
e. In re Winship (1970)
According to the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which of the following is a possible sign that someone is a victim of human trafficking?
a. The person is very familiar with the neighborhood
b. The person lives far away from the work premises
c. The person often moves among various work sites
d. The person appears to travel alone very frequently
Out of the given choices, it may be stated that when a person often moves among various work sites, then it is a possible sign that he or she is a victim of human trafficking as per the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Homeland Security. Therefore, the option C holds true.
The practice of human trafficking is a common crime relevant in the American society. This has existed in the American society ever since the practices of slavery were active. However, after an amendment in the constitution, this practice of human trafficking has been termed as illegal.
Learn more human trafficking here:
https://brainly.com/question/28182536
#SPJ4
A state legislature has the option of adopting or rejecting a uniform law.a. Trueb. False
A state legislature has the option of adopting or rejecting a uniform law. - True
The primary duty of the state legislature, which is a unit of the state's government, is to ideally develop, implement, and alter legislation in the house. The Uniform Law Commission and other identical law commissions create model laws that are then suggested to state legislatures for adoption.
These standard laws are intended to promote consistency and uniformity in specific legal areas across the states. States have the freedom to enact this standard legislation even though they are not obligated to. A standard legislation is incorporated into the state's laws if it is adopted by the state legislature. It thus, stays outside of state law if the state legislature decides not to adopt the uniform law.
Read more about state legislature on:
https://brainly.com/question/13036293
#SPJ4
Explain how the prompt below is an example of checks and balances between the three branches of government. “You just got pulled over by a police officer. He writes you a ticket for texting while driving. The only problem is you didn’t have your cellphone at the time, because you lost your phone on vacation with your family the week prior! There is nothing you can do in the moment about receiving the ticket, but... there is something you can do about having to pay the fine. In fact you may be a like to have the ticket removed from your record altogether!” Explain below how checks and balances may save your wallet money and your driving record.
Answer:Cause they can’t check it and if your doing good it helps
Explanation:
Which of the following statements best describes businesses that give
attention to CSR ideals?
O A. Profit never negatively impacts a business's ability to implement
CSR practices.
O B. Profit is the only true reason to implement CSR policies, as doing
so will always make a business more profitable.
C. If a business is concerned with profit, it will never do what it
should in regards to CSR practices.
D. Every business wants to make a profit, but those that adhere to
CSR principles also focus on areas besides just profits.
SUBMIT
Answer: D. Every business to make a profit, but those that adhere to CSR principles also focus on areas besides just profits
Explanation:
how case law and statutory law are interrelated
Answer:
Common law is defined as law that has been developed on the basis of preceding rulings by judges. Statutory laws are written laws passed by legislature and government of a country and those which have been accepted by the society.
Explanation:
6. A speed limit is best described as:
A - Substantive law
B - Procedural law
C - Local rules of a court
D - None of the above
7. State’s rights are outlined in the:
A - The 4 th Amendment to the U. B - The Federal Register
C - The 10 th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
D - The common Law
6. A speed limit is best described as Substantive law. Thus, the correct answer is option A.
7. State’s rights are outlined in the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Thus, the correct answer is option C.
The laws that specify how members of a society are expected to behave are known as substantive law. In contrast, procedural law—a collection of rules for creating, implementing, and upholding substantive law—is used to define and contrast this concept.
The Constitution reserves all other authorities to the individual States or to the people; neither the United States nor the States are given those rights by the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights to clarify the relationship between the federal and state governments. According to the amendment, the federal government only has the authority that the Constitution expressly grants it.
Therefore, the appropriate options are A and C respectively.
To learn more on substantive law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8324784
#SPJ4
................................................................................................................................UNKNOWN....................................................................I'M A SPY.................................................................................
a cross-complaint is a document ________.
Answer:
true
Explanation: it is true,yes
A cross-complaint is a document that is filed by a defendant in a civil case, in response to the plaintiff's initial complaint. It is used to raise new claims for relief that are separate and distinct from the original complaint.
A cross-complaint is a document that is filed by a defendant against a plaintiff in a legal dispute.
This type of document is used to assert a claim against the plaintiff, and it typically includes a statement of the defendant's claim, the facts supporting that claim, and the relief that the defendant is seeking.
In many cases, a cross-complaint is used to seek damages or other relief from the plaintiff in response to the plaintiff's original complaint.
This can be an important part of a legal dispute, as it allows the defendant to assert their own claims and seek relief from the plaintiff.
To know more about document refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/20696445#
#SPJ11
A plan that provides the rules, goals, and a framework for government is
called a ________?
A. Consensus
B. Preamble
C. Political Party
D. Constitution
which part of the constitution ensures that judges don’t worry about what might happen if they deliver a fair but unpopular ruling?
In accordance with Article III of the Constitution, judges "shall keep their offices during good behavior." Although a little ambiguous, the meaning is obvious.
The seventh book of the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament is the Book of Judges. The time between the conquest recorded in the Book of Joshua and the founding of a kingdom depicted in the Books of Samuel is covered in the Hebrew Bible's narrative. During this period, biblical judges acted as temporary rulers. The narratives all have similar structure: the people turn away from Yahweh and are thus given over to their enemies; they repent and beg Yahweh for mercy, and he responds by sending a leader or champion; the judge frees the Israelites from oppression and they prosper; soon after, they turn away from Yahweh once more, and the cycle is repeated. Many of the tales are taken into consideration by academics.
Learn more about judges from
brainly.com/question/29885435
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an example of a third party law? A law that requires annual car inspections. people who ride motorcycles to wear a helmet. people who drive a car to wear a seat belt. All of the above. Question 44 Which of the following is a true statement? Austrian economists believe that by raising taxes on the top income earners, we can afford our social programs, fund the military, and pay off the national debt. Keynesian economists believe that we should stimulate growth by lowering taxes and regulations, especially on business groups. Most voters may support the tax the rich strategy because one-half of income earners receive back from the government more than they pay in taxes and/or they do not consider themselves rich. The bottom half of taxpayers paid more than 60% of federal taxes in a recent year.
The correct answer to the first question is "All of the above." Each of the examples mentioned (annual car inspections, wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle, and wearing a seat belt while driving a car) represents a third party law.
These laws impose requirements or restrictions on individuals for the purpose of protecting the safety and well-being of others.
Regarding the second statement, the true statement is "Most voters may support the tax the rich strategy because one-half of income earners receive back from the government more than they pay in taxes and/or they do not consider themselves rich." This statement highlights a potential reason why many voters might support taxing the rich. It suggests that some individuals may not perceive themselves as being affected by higher taxes on top income earners and may benefit from government programs that are funded through such taxation.
It's important to note that the other statements provided in the question represent different economic perspectives and opinions, rather than universally accepted truths. Austrian economists and Keynesian economists have different views on tax policies and economic strategies. The statement about the bottom half of taxpayers paying more than 60% of federal taxes in a recent year may be a factual claim, but without specific data or context, it is challenging to determine its accuracy.
To know more about third party law
https://brainly.com/question/9996328
#SPJ11
in which country on the graph was the recent voter turnout 83 percent?
Is a security officer justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone?
A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone.
A security officer is a professional who is trained to secure and protect individuals and property. Security personnel may be found in a variety of settings, including corporate offices, malls, hospitals, and other locations. These professionals are tasked with ensuring the safety of individuals and property under their supervision.
Provocation is a situation in which an individual engages in actions or makes statements that are intended to provoke or incite another person. This may include insults, threats, and other forms of verbal or physical aggression.
A reaction to a stimulus is referred to as a response. This may include a variety of physiological, emotional, and cognitive changes. In terms of behavior, a response is the way in which an individual responds to a particular situation. The response to verbal provocation by a security officer may differ based on the situation and the level of provocation.
A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone. This is due to the fact that the use of force is only allowed when it is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to oneself or others. When verbal provocation occurs, a security officer should attempt to defuse the situation verbally before resorting to the use of force.
Furthermore, if a security officer uses force in response to verbal provocation, they may face legal consequences, including charges of assault or battery. As a result, it is recommended that security personnel receive training on conflict resolution and effective communication to deal with potentially difficult situations.
You can learn more about security officers at: https://brainly.com/question/28326176
#SPJ11
Business Law
Choose 6 of the 8 terms listed. For each term that you select, (1) identify the legal context in which it arises; and (2) define the term. indicate whether the term relates to "pretrial," "trial," or "posttrial" procedures and/ or to which part of the Constitution the term relates.
(a) summons
(b) Bill of Rights
(c) motion in limine
(d) voir dire
(e) jury instructions.
(f) symbolic speech
(g) verdict
(h) relevant evidence
Legal context refers to the framework of laws, regulations, and legal principles that surround a specific issue or situation. Pretrial, trial, and posttrial procedures are distinct stages in the legal process. Pretrial procedures involve actions taken before a trial begins, such as gathering evidence, filing motions, and selecting a jury. Trial procedures refer to the actual conduct of a trial, where parties present their case to a judge or jury. Posttrial procedures occur after the trial's conclusion and may include appeals, enforcement of judgments, or resolution of outstanding issues.
(a) Summons: A summons is a pretrial procedure in which a legal document is issued by a court to the defendant in a case, notifying them of the lawsuit and requiring them to appear in court. The summons informs the defendant that they must respond to the plaintiff's complaint within a certain time frame. It guarantees the right to a fair trial. This term relates to the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation as well as relates to the Due Process Clause in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
(b) Bill of Rights: The Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which outline and protect the fundamental rights and liberties of individuals. These amendments establish a variety of rights (individual rights), such as freedom of speech and the right to a fair trial. These amendments relate to both pretrial and trial procedures. It also addresses post-trial procedures.
(c) Motion in limine: A motion in limine is a pretrial motion made by either party in a legal case, requesting that the court exclude certain evidence from being presented at trial. This motion is typically filed when one party believes that the evidence is inadmissible or prejudicial and could unfairly influence the jury's decision. It relates to the Rules of Evidence and can be tied to the 6th Amendment's right to a fair trial as well as to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees the right to a fair trial.
(d) Voir dire: Voir dire is a pretrial procedure in which the judge and attorneys question potential jurors to determine their impartiality and suitability for serving on the jury. The goal of voir dire is to select a fair and unbiased jury for the trial i.e., it guarantees the right to an impartial jury. It is related to the 6th Amendment's guarantee of an impartial jury and the 7th Amendment's right to a trial by jury in civil cases.
(e) Jury instructions: Jury instructions are given during the trial phase, wherein the judge provides the jury with guidance on how to apply the law to the facts of the case or evidence. These instructions help ensure that the jury reaches a verdict based on a proper understanding of the applicable laws and legal standards. It guarantees the right to a fair trial. This term relates to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
(f) Symbolic speech: Posttrial procedure where a defendant can challenge their conviction if they feel their freedom of speech has been violated. This term relates to the First Amendment, which protects the freedom of speech and expression.
(g) Verdict: The verdict is a posttrial procedure in which the jury, after considering the evidence and applying the relevant laws, decides on the outcome of the case. The verdict can be either guilty or not guilty in a criminal trial, or a determination of liability and damages in a civil trial. This term relates to the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees the right to a trial by jury.
(h) Relevant evidence: Relevant evidence is any evidence presented during the trial phase of a legal case that has a direct bearing on the facts of the case. It must be both material (having a direct relationship to the matter at hand) and probative (tending to prove or disprove a fact in question) to be admissible in court. This term relates to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees the right to a fair trial.
Learn more about Constitutional Amendments: https://brainly.com/question/13276616.
#SPJ11
Which of the following forced state governments to give African Americans the right to participate in the voting process?
Thirteenth Amendment
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Voting Rights Act of 1965
Nineteenth Amendment
Answer:
Nineteenth Amendment or D
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark civil rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.
What is the meaning of The Civil Rights Act of 1964?Public Law 88-352 was passed by Congress in 1964. (78 Stat. 241). Discrimination against people based on their race, color, religion, sex, or country of origin is illegal under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This civil rights act's provisions prohibited sex discrimination in addition to racial discrimination in terms of hiring, promoting, and dismissing.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed racial prejudice. Additionally, it ended racial school segregation. The 88th United States Congress passed this Act, which went into effect on July 2, 1964. The preceding Civil Rights Act of 1957 and 1960 was modified by this public law. It guards against the state or any of its powers violating the people's civil rights.
Learn more about the Civil Rights Act of 1964 here:
https://brainly.com/question/10185916
#SPJ6
What is the purpose of reverse 911? Select all that apply.
to call several numbers simultaneously, seeking criminal suspects
to provide a way for several members of the community to speak with the 911 operator at the same time
to contact residents in a specific area with emergency messages
to either speak with residents by recorded message or leave voice and text messages at each residence
Answer:
1. To contact residents in a specific area with emergency messages
2. To either speak with residents by recorded message or leave voice and text messages at each residence
Explanation:
Reverse 911 is a system that allows emergency responders to quickly contact residents in a specific area in case of an emergency. The system uses a database of telephone numbers for residents and businesses in a specific area and allows emergency responders to send recorded messages or text messages to all of the numbers in the database in a specific geographic area. This allows emergency responders to quickly notify residents of an emergency, such as an evacuation order, a gas leak, or a power outage, and provide them with important information and instructions. The Reverse 911 system could be activated by an emergency responder or it could be set up to automatically notify residents in the event of a certain emergency.
One of the following is not a model of democracy:
a. Classical democracy
O b. Protective democracy
OC.
O d.
Developmental democracy
None of the above
From the above list, no option is referred to as a model of democracy. Thus the correct answer is D, none of the above.
What do you mean by democracy?Democracy is the process of choosing the representatives of government with the willingness of the citizens through elections. This representative works for the welfare of society.
There are various types of democracy models have been introduced to implement better functioning and decision making. These democracy models are participative democracy, direct democracy, representative democracy, and so on.
Therefore, the correct option is D, none of the above is a model of democracy.
Learn more about democracy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ1