Answer:
B. Songs the people on the urn appear to be playing
Explanation:
Edge
John Keats uses the phrase "spirit ditties" to describe the Songs the people on the urn appear to be playing. Option B is correct.
Who was John Keats?English poet John Keats, along with Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley, was a member of the second generation of Romantic poets. At the age of 25, he had been publishing his poems for less than four years when he passed away from tuberculosis.
While he was alive, they were not well received, but after his passing, his fame soared. He was included in the canon of English literature by the turn of the century and had a significant impact on several Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood authors; in 1888, the Encyclopedia Britannica referred to one ode as "one of the ultimate masterpieces."
Jorge Luis Borges referred to his first meeting with Keats as a memory he would carry with him forever. "Heavily filled with sensualities" may be said about John Keats' style.
Therefore John Keats uses the phrase "spirit ditties" to describe the Songs the people on the urn appear to be playing.
Learn more about John Keats refer:
https://brainly.com/question/1276912
#SPJ5
Great Expectations is a classic coming-of-age novel. What is an alternate term for this type of novel
An alternate term for a coming-of-age novel is a bildungsroman. The term "bildungsroman" is a German word that translates to "novel of formation" or "novel of education." It refers to a genre of literature that focuses on the psychological and moral growth of the protagonist from youth to adulthood, typically portraying their development, self-discovery, and maturation.
In a bildungsroman, the central theme revolves around the protagonist's journey of self-realization, navigating challenges, and gaining wisdom through various experiences.
narrative often explores the character's conflicts, struggles, and transformation as they grapple with societal expectations, personal identity, and their place in the world.
"Great Expectations" by Charles Dickens is indeed considered a classic example of a bildungsroman, as it follows the life of the protagonist, Pip, from his humble beginnings to his encounters with wealth, love, and self-discovery. Throughout the novel, Pip undergoes a significant personal growth and moral development, making it a quintessential coming-of-age story.
Learn more about literature here:
https://brainly.com/question/13098221
#SPJ11
In the bluest eye who has power ? Who takes power away ?what empowers or disempowers characters ? How is power used ?
1. In the novel, power is primarily held by white society, which sets the standards of beauty and enforces a racist hierarchy.
2. The power dynamics in the story are structured in a way that disempowers characters who do not fit the societal beauty standards, particularly those who are Black.
3. Characters in the novel are disempowered by oppressive societal norms and the internalization of those norms.
What is The Bluest Eye?In Toni Morrison's novel "The Bluest Eye," power dynamics are explored among various characters, particularly in the context of race, beauty standards, and societal oppression.
Power is used in "The Bluest Eye" as a tool for domination, control, and marginalization. White characters use their power to reinforce racial hierarchies, maintain their privilege, and perpetuate harmful beauty ideals.
Learn more about The Bluest Eye on https://brainly.com/question/13514111
#SPJ1
Someone help me please
Answer:
it is b
Explanation:
Which of the following sentences uses the colon correctly?
OA.
We ate the following foods: sauerbraten, knockwurst, and black forest cake.
ОВ.
I am so excited that we're going to Florida for vacation:
OC.
:Danger do not attempt to combine product with hydrochloric acid.
OD.
The sign: read the Quick 'n' Save is going out of business.
Reset
Submit
Answer:
The first one, OA.
Explanation:
from succession answers
While Malala was in the hospital, protesters in Pakistan marched
with signs that read “I am Malala.” What is the significance of
these particular words? What message do they send?
Answer:
They are saying that they are the change. Malala stood up for what she believed in and that she was the change. Thats why the people held up posters that said "i am Malala", they were saying that they are also the change
hope this helps...if not...im sorry
What were three salient features of the reign of terror during the French revolution? Please Explain.
The Reign of Terror was a period in French history (September 5, 1793 to July 27, 1794) during which the Revolutionary government decided to take extremely harsh measures against people accused of being against the Revolution. This led to a wave of executions and deaths at the hands of the revolutionaries.
Several features can be identified in this "Terror." First, a salient feature of the Reign of Terror was its brutality and immediacy. People who were killed during this time were often not tried properly. The revolutionaries exercised a type of dictatorial power, sentencing people without due process. Another salient feature of this time period was the anti-religious measures taken by the government. These were an attempt to de-Christianize France, making it more secular. Finally, one of the features of the Reign of Terror was its economic element, as price-controls were implemented in order to support the poor.
Module 2 Post-Test
is a priest speaking in church rhetorical communication?
Both the sermon and the wording of the ordinances ARE rhetorical
O The sermon is rhetorical, but the wording of the ordinances IS NOT rhetorical
The sermon IS NOT rhetorical, but the wording to the ordinances is rhetorical.
Both the sermon and the wording of the ordinances ARE NOT rhetorical
The correct answer is that the sermon is rhetorical, but the wording of the ordinances is not rhetorical, option B is correct.
Rhetorical communication involves the use of language and other communication techniques to persuade or influence an audience. A sermon is a form of public speaking that aims to persuade or influence the audience on religious or moral matters, making it a form of rhetorical communication.
On the other hand, the wording of ordinances is typically straightforward and factual, without the use of persuasion or other rhetorical techniques, making it not a form of rhetorical communication, option B is correct.
To learn more about rhetorical follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/12327267
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Module 2 Post-Testis a priest speaking in church rhetorical communication?
A) Both the sermon and the wording of the ordinances ARE rhetorical
B) The sermon is rhetorical, but the wording of the ordinances IS NOT rhetorical
C) The sermon IS NOT rhetorical, but the wording to the ordinances is rhetorical.
D) Both the sermon and the wording of the ordinances ARE NOT rhetorical
Directions:
Find a post online (preferably from social media) that provides information or a claim
The post needs to be relatively school appropriate
Fact Check the post!
Answer the following questions in complete sentences:
Information and/or claim presented:
WHO is providing the information/post?
WHY are they sharing that information? What motivation or benefit do they get from sharing this information or providing this claim?
WHAT is the evidence behind their claims?
Do they provide any evidence?
What is the source of that evidence? Is it reliable? Can you tell if it is reliable?
What do OTHER SOURCES say about this information or claim?
Do any other sources support/repeat this information? List them here.
Are these other sources reliable? Why or why not?
Reflection:
What was difficult to find?
Did some sources seem credible, but ultimately weren’t? How did you know?
Why did I choose this information/claim to fact check?
Answer:
QUESTION: A writer wants to develop an argument on the following issue: Social media can be a distraction, but its uses outweigh its drawbacks. Which answer offers the most precise argumentative claim on this issue?
Explanation: Depending on the writers beliefs of the issue stated above, the argument can be that the issue is true / positive or it can be false / negative towards the statement.
1. With all that social media sites have to offer, it is not surprising that people spend so much time on it that they waste their days. (This does not address the benefits / uses.)
2. Social media sites offer a great many benefits to people for communication, and no one should avoid it on principle. (This is pro-social media it does not argue the negative drawbacks.)
3. ANSWER: While social media sites often distract us from our daily duties, with balance, there are useful ways it can improve our lives. This statement A.) Addresses & acknowledges the negative - distraction. B.) Offers a solution - time management. C.) Concludes that there are useful ways it can improve our lives.
4. Given our dependence on social media, it's no wonder we have lost the ability to do simple tasks like talk to people face-to-face. (This argues only the negative side and does not mention benefits.)
Explanation: Please mark brainliest!
in act one scene one why is mama expecting to come into some money in a raisin in the sun
Answer: She had just lost her husband and is waiting for ten thousand dollars from his life insurance .
Explanation: The insurance company is giving the wife of the deceased money because she had a ten thousand dollar life insurance on the husband .
Question 5 of 10
What is the primary purpose of "The Perils of Indifference"?
A. To ask people to remember the Holocaust and to make sure it
never happens again
B. To remind people that war criminals are still alive and should be
put on trial
OC. To thank Americans for all of their help and sacrifices in freeing
the Jews during World War II
D. To motivate people to do something when they see other human
beings suffering
The primary purpose of "The Perils of Indifference" speech is to ask people to remember the Holocaust and to ensure it never happens again. The correct answer is option A.
Elie Wiesel's speech was delivered at the White House on April 12, 1999, where he was honored with the Congressional Gold Medal by President Bill Clinton. Wiesel was a Holocaust survivor and a Nobel Peace Prize recipient. In his speech, he talks about the dangers of indifference and how it can lead to devastating consequences.
He explains how indifference was prevalent during the Holocaust and allowed it to happen. He then goes on to say that indifference is still a problem today, and it is our responsibility to speak out against it. Wiesel asks people to remember the Holocaust and to ensure that it never happens again. He emphasizes the importance of speaking out against injustice and suffering. He ends his speech by urging people to take action when they see other human beings suffering.
The primary purpose of Elie Wiesel's speech "The Perils of Indifference" is to ask people to remember the Holocaust and to ensure that it never happens again. He explains how indifference can lead to devastating consequences and urges people to speak out against it. He emphasizes the importance of taking action when they see other human beings suffering.
For more such questions on Holocaust, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/12962
#SPJ8
Is the blank a semi colon comma or neither
Answer:Comma
Explanation:Because he is adding on to the story
What does concise language do?
A It provides the most impact for the audience.
B It sacrifices the overall effect of the writing.
C It helps to expand the length of the text.
D It helps the reader learn new vocabulary. HELP ME!!!
Answer:
concise languages help in the reader learn new vocabulary so the answer is D.
Explanation:
u can see have helped u so plz give me brainiest pIzzzz
How would you fell if you were forced to use dirty old book ? What would you do to change the situation ?
Can someone help
Me answer this
Answer:
You can buy new books.
Explanation:
Compare and contrast the meeting of the conspirators in Scene 3 with the meeting of the triumvirate in Scene I. In what ways are the scenes parallel? In what ways are they different?
In Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar," the meetings of the conspirators in Act 2, Scene 3, and the triumvirate in Act 4, Scene 1, share similarities in terms of a gathering with a shared purpose and decision-making processes. In terms of parallelism, both scenes involve a gathering of individuals with a shared purpose. In Act 2, Scene 3, the conspirators, including Brutus and Cassius, come together to plan the assassination of Julius Caesar. They differ in terms of their motivations, focus, and tone. These contrasting elements reflect the different contexts and objectives of the conspirators and the triumvirate in the play.
In Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar," the meeting of the conspirators in Act 2, Scene 3, and the meeting of the triumvirate in Act 4, Scene 1, share both similarities and differences.
In terms of parallelism, both scenes involve a gathering of individuals with a shared purpose. In Act 2, Scene 3, the conspirators, including Brutus and Cassius, come together to plan the assassination of Julius Caesar. Similarly, in Act 4, Scene 1, the triumvirate, composed of Octavius, Antony, and Lepidus, convenes to discuss matters of political power and the purge of their enemies.
Furthermore, both meetings demonstrate the importance of alliances and decision-making. The conspirators in Act 2, Scene 3, engage in discussions, deliberations, and debates about the necessary actions to be taken. They weigh the moral and political consequences of their plan. Similarly, the triumvirate in Act 4, Scene 1, engages in strategic discussions, negotiating the division of power and identifying potential threats to their authority.
However, there are significant differences between the two scenes as well. In Act 2, Scene 3, the conspirators are motivated by a belief that Caesar's ambition poses a threat to the Roman Republic. Their meeting revolves around a plot to protect the Republic by assassinating Caesar. On the other hand, in Act 4, Scene 1, the triumvirate is driven by a desire to consolidate power and maintain control over Rome. Their meeting focuses on identifying enemies, carrying out purges, and discussing their political strategies.
Additionally, the tone and atmosphere differ between the two scenes. The conspirators' meeting is characterized by secrecy and caution, with an underlying sense of tension and anxiety. In contrast, the triumvirate's meeting is more formal and calculated, with a display of authority and dominance.
For more such information on: Shakespeare's
https://brainly.com/question/7592021
#SPJ11
Millions of people owe their lives to the knowledge of Louis Pasteur. First, he discovered the causes of many diseases. Pasteur found that tiny organisms called microorganisms or germs were a major cause of many diseases. Later, Pasteur developed a vaccine to protect humans and animals against a number of deadly diseases.
How is the information in this paragraph organized?
Do all of the sentences in the paragraph help to answer the why question?
Does the repetition of certain words or their synonyms help to relate all the sentences to the central idea?
Louis Pasteur's knowledge saved lives by discovering disease causes and developing vaccines. The paragraph is organized chronologically, and the repetition of key words reinforces the central idea.
The information in this paragraph is organized chronologically. It begins with Louis Pasteur's discovery of the causes of diseases, followed by his identification of microorganisms as a major cause. Finally, it mentions Pasteur's development of vaccines to protect against deadly diseases.
All of the sentences in the paragraph contribute to answering the "how" question. They explain how Louis Pasteur's knowledge and discoveries have saved millions of lives, emphasizing his identification of disease causes and his development of vaccines.
The repetition of certain words and their synonyms helps to relate all the sentences to the central idea. Words like "Pasteur," "discover," "diseases," "microorganisms," and "vaccine" are used consistently throughout the paragraph, reinforcing the focus on Louis Pasteur's contributions to disease prevention and treatment. This repetition helps to establish a clear and cohesive connection between the sentences and the central idea of Pasteur's life-saving knowledge.
For more such questions on repetition, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/9134427
#SPJ8
Watch this brief clip of the song, “The Schuyler Sisters Links to an external site.from the musical Hamilton. Annjelica quotes the Declaration of Independence (1:25) and then says when she meets Thomas Jefferson she is going to compel him to include women in the sequel. Why is it important to include diverse voices in foundational documents, laws and national discussions? Which other voices are not represented in this document and how does that omission matter?
It is important to include diverse voices in key documents so that no group of citizens is socially excluded. The voices that are not being represented in the document are blacks, indigenous peoples, and foreigners, and this omission matters because it leaves them socially devalued.
Why is it dangerous for groups of citizens to be socially devalued?Because it undermines respect for the rights of these citizens.Because it allows these people to be socially abused.Because it prevents equality between citizens.Historically, the country's important documents that emphasize respect for citizens and the guarantee of basic rights, left important groups of American society such as women, blacks, indigenous people, and foreigners in shape.
Historically, the country's important documents that emphasize respect for citizens and the guarantee of basic rights, left out important groups of American society such as women, blacks, indigenous people, and foreigners.
This prevented these individuals from working more for themselves and helping more diligently in social advancement.
Learn more about political representation:
https://brainly.com/question/13781336
#SPJ1
What is the most likely way Yasmín determined the meaning of mobocracy as being related to ruling
The most likely way Yasmín determined the meaning of mobocracy as being related to ruling is through context clues. Context clues are hints or indications that can be used to deduce the meaning of an unknown word by looking at the words or sentences surrounding it.
These words or sentences provide hints about what the unknown word may mean, as well as a general understanding of what the text is discussing. Yasmín likely determined the meaning of mobocracy as related to ruling through the context clues provided in the surrounding text.
She may have read sentences or paragraphs that discussed the concept of mob rule or the idea that a group of people could govern or have power over others.The term mobocracy, which is a combination of the words "mob" and "democracy," is often used to describe a government or society that is controlled by a group of people who use violence or other forms of coercion to exert their authority.
In this sense, mobocracy is often seen as a form of authoritarianism that is opposed to democracy or other forms of representative government.In conclusion, the most likely way Yasmín determined the meaning of mobocracy as being related to ruling is through context clues.
She likely read sentences or paragraphs that discussed the concept of mob rule or the idea that a group of people could govern or have power over others.
For more question on authority
https://brainly.com/question/31018838
#SPJ8
Oh no," said Milo seriously. "In my family we all start on the ground and grow up, and we never know how far until we actually get there."
"What a silly system." The boy laughed. "Then your head keeps changing its height and you always see things in a different way? Why, when you're fifteen things won't look at all the way they did when you were ten, and at twenty everything will change again."
In addition to Milo's height, which will most likely change his perspective as he gets older?
his electric car
his experiences
his mystery package
his phantom tollbooth
Answer:
experiences maybe?
Explanation:
Answer:
his experiences
Explanation:
Read “The Four Clever Brothers,” and then identify the story’s main elements by filling in the table.
Answer:
The Four Clever Brothers," a 1905 fairy tale by the Grimm Brothers.
Elements of the "The Four Clever Brothers:"
Explanation:
1. Setting: This story was set in a rural village at the home of a poor man with four sons.
2. Plot: A poor sent out his four sons to learn some crafts in the world in order to become useful in life. The sons complied and were able to learn useful skills that helped them to solve real-life problems. With their skills they were able to rescue the daughter of a powerful king who settled them with power and riches that enabled them to live blissfully and fulfilled.
3. Characters: A poor man, four sons of the poor man, men who taught them worldly skills, the dragon, the king, and his daughter. The chief protagonists are the four sons of the poor man. Though their names were not mentioned, the story revolved around them. Other characters contributed to the plot.
4. Conflict: Who marries the rescued princess?
5. Theme: The theme runs around the importance of skills and the wise application of the learned skills.
6. Point of view: It was told by a third person point of view. The narrator told the stories of other characters. He or she was not involved. She did not put ideas in the characters.
What criteria must you consider before evaluating any work of literature?
Select one:
a.
the way the work handles contemporary issues
b.
the historical accuracy of the work’s setting
c.
the author’s purpose and the genre of the work
d.
the genre and the popularity of the work
Answer:
C. The author's purpose and the genre of the work
Explanation:
Based on
paragraphs 10 through 12, what must stunt actors do to train for their jobs?
Answer:
they must practice stunts while out of action
Explanation:
Also most movie producing companies have a session where stunt actors can practice
hoped that helped
what are the main points of outsiders 3-5 please
Answer:
Johnny, ponyboy, and Dallas go to the drive in and meet two girls named Cherry and Marcia whom are to socs girls. Cherry's bf went after Ponyboy and Johnny and Johnny stabbed cherry's bf. Johnny and ponyboy go runaway. they stayed at a church and they got new haircuts after a while. Dallas met up with them and got them food. and then they get back to the church, it was if flames. a small crowd of two adults and a bunch of children were outside and some where stuck inside. Johnny and Pony save the children stuck inside and Johnny gets hurt because of a wooden beam and the fire.
Explanation:
which sentence demonstrates parallel structure? group of answer choices the plot was implausible, the actors acted amateurish, and the violence was unnecessary. the plot was implausible, the actors were amateurish, and the violence was unnecessary. the plot was implausible, the actors were amateurish, and the film contained unnecessary violence. the plot had implausibility, the actors acted amateurishly, and there was unnecessary violence.
From the following sentences "the plot was implausible, the actors were amateurish, and the violence was unnecessary" demonstrates parallel structure.
Violence is the willful application of physical force with the goal to cause hurt, abuse, harm, or destruction. According to estimates, 1.28 million people died as a result of violence in the globe in 2013, up from 1.13 million in 1990. An estimated 405,000 people will die from interpersonal violence globally in 2013, of which 180,000 will die from gun attacks, 114,000 from assaults with sharp items, and the other 110,000 will die from other causes.
There are several strategies to stop violence. Countries' mutable features, such as concentrated (regional) poverty, economic and gender inequality, and alcohol misuse, have a strong association with their levels of violence.
To know more about Violence here-
https://brainly.com/question/8075105
#SPJ4
what is the most important difference between a research paper and a simple essay?
The most important difference between a research paper and a simple essay is that a research paper requires extensive research, analysis, and documentation of sources.
While a simple essay may only require a basic understanding of a topic and the ability to present a coherent argument or idea. A research paper typically involves conducting in-depth research on a topic, evaluating multiple sources, and synthesizing information to form a unique argument or perspective. Additionally, research papers often require proper citation and documentation of sources to support the author's claims.
On the other hand, a simple essay may be based on personal opinions or experiences and may not require extensive research or documentation. The most important difference between a research paper and a simple essay is that a research paper involves extensive investigation and analysis of various sources, while a simple essay typically presents the writer's thoughts, opinions, or arguments without significant external evidence.
To know more about argument visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/7383177
#SPJ11
which of the following is an opinion? 1 Roger Federer is the best tennis player to have ever lived. 2 The first Wimbledon tournament was played in 1877. Tennis is an Olympic sport. The word '' Tennis ''comes from the Anglo-Norman term ''Tenez''.
Answer:
1 Roger Federer is the best tennis player to have ever lived
Answer:
1. Roger Federer is the best tennis player to have ever lived.Read this excerpt from Memoirs of the Year 1793 by Charles Brockden Brown, another story related to the yellow fever outbreak. He leaned his head against the wall; his eyes were shut, his hands clasped in each other, and his body seemed to be sustained in an upright position merely by the cellar-door against which he rested his left shoulder. The lethargy into which he was sunk seemed scarcely interrupted by my feeling his hand and his forehead. His throbbing temples and burning skin indicated a fever . . . . There was only one circumstance that hindered me from forming an immediate determination in what manner this person should be treated. My family consisted of my wife and a young child. Our servant-maid had been seized, three days before, by the reigning malady, and, at her own request, had been conveyed to the hospital. We ourselves enjoyed good health, and were hopeful of escaping with our lives. Our measures for this end had been cautiously taken and carefully adhered to. They did not consist in avoiding the receptacles of infection, for my office required me to go daily into the midst of them; nor in filling the house with the exhalations of gunpowder, vinegar, or tar. They consisted in cleanliness, reasonable exercise, and wholesome diet. Who is the story’s first-person narrator?
Answer:
Explanation:
a
which is a diagnostic information-gathering form?
A diagnostic information-gathering form is a structured document that helps in gathering data about an individual's background, education, job experience, and other relevant information.
It is a type of assessment form that allows a therapist, counselor, or other healthcare professionals to gather information from patients about their health status, behavior, and other important information that could assist in a diagnosis. It is used in different settings, such as health care, education, and employment.
In a healthcare setting, it is used to gather information about patients' health history and current health status. In an educational setting, it is used to assess students' strengths and weaknesses to provide the necessary support and guidance to help them achieve academic success.
In an employment setting, it is used to collect information about the job applicant's education, work experience, and other relevant information to help the employer make an informed decision.
You can learn more about information-gathering at: brainly.com/question/28215134
#SPJ11
2. what accounts for the difference in temperature between west virginia and kentucky? (2 pts)
The difference in temperature between West Virginia and Kentucky is primarily due to their varying elevations and geographical locations. West Virginia's higher elevation and more northern position result in cooler temperatures compared to Kentucky's lower elevation and more southern location.
West Virginia is situated within the Appalachian Mountain range, which causes its elevation to be significantly higher than that of Kentucky. As a result, temperatures tend to be cooler in higher elevations due to the decrease in air pressure and density. This elevation difference means that West Virginia experiences more significant temperature fluctuations throughout the year, with colder winters and milder summers than Kentucky.
In addition to elevation, geographical location plays a crucial role in the temperature differences between these two states. West Virginia is positioned farther north than Kentucky, and as such, it is closer to the cooler air masses coming from the Arctic region. This results in colder average temperatures for West Virginia compared to Kentucky, which is located closer to the warmer air masses from the Gulf of Mexico.
In summary, the difference in temperature between West Virginia and Kentucky can be attributed to their distinct elevations and geographical locations. West Virginia's higher elevation within the Appalachian Mountains and its more northern position result in cooler temperatures, while Kentucky's lower elevation and more southern location lead to warmer temperatures.
Know more about the Appalachian Mountain range here:
https://brainly.com/question/14009769
#SPJ11
Which of the following lists of words from this passage indicates the author's intention?
a. controversy, debates, believe
b. amendment, constitution, citizens
c. frequent, public, necessary
d. absolute, firearms, restrictions
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It's pretty much talking about the debate of the Constitution.
The Second Amendment was primarily passed to avoid the requirement for the United States to create a professional standing army, according to several historians. Thus, option A is correct.
What author's Second Amendment of US Constitution?The “right of the people to keep and bear arms” is protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. But without understanding the intent, context, and goals of the draftsmen, it is impossible to comprehend the meaning of this clause.
The Founders believed that people should be able to defend themselves from the government and any other dangers to their safety or individual liberties. Citizens now have the right to protect their lives and property thanks to the Second Amendment.
Therefore, It appears that when it was passed, it was not intended to give private citizens the right to possess guns for self-defence.
Learn more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ2