jessica is about to tunr 1 year old, and she is beginning to use her legs and body to stand up and walk. according to the lifespan persepctive, jessica;s walking behavior is an exxample of a

Answer:

D: The Constitution does not take a stance on voting rights.

Explanation:

Hi! Hope this helps. Have a good day! Rate and leave a thanks it helps me so much bye :)

Answer:

D) all of the above

Explanation:

hope this helps and i'm very sorry if i'm wrong <3

Brainliest?

Answer: all of the above

Explanation:

Detailed records of goods held for resale are not maintained under a perpetual inventory system.

Under a perpetual inventory system, detailed records of goods held for resale are not maintained. This inventory system relies on real-time tracking of inventory levels through the use of technology such as barcodes and point-of-sale systems. Instead of periodically counting and reconciling inventory, a perpetual inventory system updates inventory quantities with each sale or purchase transaction.

In a perpetual inventory system, the focus is on maintaining an accurate and up-to-date record of inventory levels rather than relying on periodic physical counts. This approach allows for better visibility into inventory levels, helps prevent stockouts or overstocking, and enables more efficient inventory management.

Learn more about  perpetual inventory

brainly.com/question/31687759

#SPJ11

Answer:

2.freedom to know is important in a democratic society

Explanation:

it is Important because each and everyone should know his or her responsibility in the society

Answer:

The common duty of citizenship,

it might be to serve in the military but I am not for sure.

The answers they provide you are not very useful ( in my opinion )

Explanation:

( i hope this helps is not im sorry )

Answer:

The only major distinction between the apartheid system in South Africa and segregation in the US is the fact that Black people make up a majority of the population in South Africa, while they are the minority in the United States

The parents' decision to prioritize the health and well-being of their infant son based on rational ethics is defensible.

In 1985, during the early stages of the AIDS epidemic, a young family faced a challenging decision.

Their infant son had a blood disorder requiring a transfusion, but the donated blood carried the risk of transmitting HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

Applying rational ethics, the parents made a calculated decision to prioritize their child's immediate health and chose to proceed with the transfusion.

From a rational ethical perspective, the parents' decision can be defended on several grounds.

Firstly, they considered the available information and assessed the risks involved.

Given that the prevalence of HIV transmission through blood transfusion was relatively low and the benefits of the transfusion outweighed the potential risks, they made a reasoned judgment based on the best available evidence at the time.

Secondly, the parents acted in the best interest of their child's well-being.

They prioritized the immediate medical need of their son, recognizing that without the transfusion, his blood disorder could have led to severe health consequences or even death.

Their decision reflects a responsible and caring approach to their child's health, guided by their duty to protect and provide the necessary medical care.

Lastly, the parents' decision aligns with the principle of autonomy, which grants individuals the right to make decisions about their own health and well-being.

In this case, the parents, as legal guardians, exercised their autonomy in making an informed choice on behalf of their infant son, considering the available medical options and acting in his best interest.

Learn more about ethical considerations

brainly.com/question/30131054

#SPJ11

According to the rule stated by the Appellate Court in Frewil v Price, if a written contract expresses the entire agreement between the parties, parol evidence (evidence outside the written contract) cannot be admitted to determine the parties' intent. Thus, The given statement is true.

This rule is based on the principle that when parties have reduced their agreement to a written contract, the written document is presumed to represent the final expression of their intentions. Therefore, extrinsic evidence, such as oral statements or prior negotiations, cannot be used to contradict or modify the terms of the written contract.

To read more about Appellate Court click here

https://brainly.com/question/13944421

#SPJ11

The factual statement about the county fiscal year in California is that it begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. This is based on the California Government Code Section 2900, which sets the standard fiscal year for counties.

The fiscal year is important for counties because it determines the timeframe for budget planning and financial reporting. County governments need to plan their budgets well in advance, and having a standardized fiscal year makes it easier to compare financial information across counties. The July 1 to June 30 fiscal year is also used by many other government entities in California, such as school districts and cities. It's important to note that some counties may have different fiscal years, but these are exceptions rather than the rule. Overall, the July 1 to June 30 fiscal year is the standard for county governments in California and is the factual statement in this scenario.

Learn more about California Government here

https://brainly.com/question/11978444

#SPJ11

Total justice refers to the idea that all perpetrators of wrongdoing must be held accountable for their actions, and all victims of wrongdoing must be fully compensated for their losses.

In American society, expectations of how the law remedies a wrong have developed over time through various legal and social mechanisms. This includes laws, court decisions, public opinion, and cultural norms.

Example of American-style total justice: A good example of American-style total justice is the case of the McDonald's Coffee lawsuit in 1994. In this case, a woman named Stella Liebeck sued McDonald's after she was severely burned by hot coffee from the restaurant. The coffee was served at a temperature of 180-190 degrees Fahrenheit, which caused third-degree burns to Liebeck's legs, groin, and buttocks.

Liebeck sued McDonald's for compensatory damages, which included medical expenses, loss of income, and pain and suffering. In response, McDonald's argued that Liebeck was at fault for her own injuries because she spilled the coffee on herself. The jury, however, found McDonald's liable and awarded Liebeck $160,000 in compensatory damages and $2.7 million in punitive damages.

Although the punitive damages were later reduced to $480,000 on appeal, the case became a well-known example of total justice because it demonstrated the importance of holding corporations accountable for their actions and compensating victims of wrongdoing.

To know more about justice visit: brainly.com/question/30337931

#SPJ11

The practice of directing minority clients to a particular part of town based on assumptions about their comfort level is a form of discrimination known as steering.

Steering is illegal under fair housing laws, which prohibit housing providers from directing or restricting housing choices based on a person's protected characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or national origin.

Carl's actions may stem from his desire to be helpful or to avoid conflict, but ultimately his behavior reinforces and perpetuates housing segregation and inequality. By assuming that people of a certain race or ethnicity will feel more comfortable in a particular part of town, he is limiting their housing options and perpetuating the idea that certain neighborhoods are only suitable for certain groups of people.

It's important for housing providers and anyone involved in the housing process to be aware of fair housing laws and to make sure that they are not engaging in discriminatory practices that limit people's housing choices.

Learn more about minority clients here:

https://brainly.com/question/28024428

#SPJ4

Answer: hello sasuke here

Explanation:

Though the American Revolution was fought primarily between Americans and the British, other European nations also fought with the Americans.

hope this helps

The Supreme Court case New York Times v. Sullivan, decided in 1964, was significant because it established important principles regarding freedom of the press, the First Amendment, and the protection of speech about public officials.

The case involved an advertisement published in The New York Times that criticized certain actions taken by officials in Montgomery, Alabama, during the civil rights movement. L.B. Sullivan, a public official in Montgomery, sued the newspaper for defamation. The Supreme Court's ruling in this case had several key impacts:

Actual Malice Standard: The Court held that for public officials to succeed in a defamation lawsuit, they must prove that false statements were made with "actual malice." This standard requires the plaintiff to show that the statements were knowingly false or made with reckless disregard for the truth. This ruling provided significant protection to the freedom of the press, making it more difficult for public officials to successfully sue for defamation.

Know mnore about Supreme Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/29759733

#SPJ11

Answer:

the two main types of interactions that environmental scientists study are how we use natural resources and how human actions alter the environment.

Explanation:

Environmental Science is the study of how human actions alter our environment and also the use of natural resources. These determine the interaction between humans and the environment.

From time immemorial human beings inclusive of all living and non-living beings have been a part of the world ethos. So, to understand how the Environment works, Environmental Science has been introduced.

Environmental Science is the study of mainly the elements which are present on the whole of Earth's biosphere. These mainly include the air, water, and land.

This study also includes the part which is being played by the organisms of a particular community present on the Earth's entire biosphere. The other important facet is to understand human involvement in the following biosphere.

To understand Environment as a whole, one most important things is to understand the ecology. This provides a direct relationship between humans and the environment. Hence, the above statement is correct.

Learn more about Environmental Science here:

https://brainly.com/question/1186120

#SPJ2

Before delivering a shock to a casualty using an AED, there are important steps to ensure safety and efficacy. First, assess the situation for safety hazards.

Confirm that the casualty is experiencing cardiac arrest by checking responsiveness, breathing, and circulation. Place the AED pads correctly on the bare chest as guided by the device. Communicate clearly with other rescuers to ensure everyone is aware of the impending shock and is clear of the casualty. Finally, ensure that no one is touching the casualty when the shock is administered to avoid interference.

These precautions are crucial for the safe and effective use of an AED, increasing the chances of successfully restoring the casualty's heart rhythm.

To learn more about AED, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32306831

#SPJ11

Answer:

american tobacco company

Answer:

B

Explanation:

By decreasing expenses, the business is trying to increase their revenue.

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

special

Explanation:

maybe like a special or something that only some people can get

In supportive listening, the primary goal is to help the speaker deal with personal problems.

Supportive listening is a term that refers to the medical and psychological tool in which a psychology professional is ready to listen to a person's problems and thoughts with the aim of helping them with their personal problems.

Generally, when a person feels bad emotionally or is overwhelmed by external problems, he should seek help from a professional so that he can listen to his thoughts and problems and advise him on a way out of his problem.

Additionally, professionals follow up on these cases and provide the necessary tools for the patient to overcome their personal problems and return to a normal life.

Learn more about psychology in: https://brainly.com/question/10980588

#SPJ1

Answer:

/

Explanation:

The availability of economic land is one of founding ideals of America that was most strongly nurtured or built up during the colonial period.

The developments and advancements achieved by the America during the colonial period, especially during the eighteenth century, was a period of extreme amount of significance for America. The American land continues to be a quintessential part of the national economy.

The European colonists, who were mostly British, had taken efforts to nurture the economic land in order to incentivize the utility the land produced when the periods such as the Industrial and Technological Revolutions struck the region.

Therefore, the significance regarding America during the colonial period has been aforementioned.

Learn more about America during the colonial period here:

https://brainly.com/question/3929514

#SPJ2

Sal is most likely found not guilty of first-degree murder because he did not act with willful premeditation when he killed Ken.

While Sal had previously thought about killing Ken, he had changed his mind and decided to work things out with him. Sal's accidental killing of Ken suggests that he did not plan or intend to kill him, and therefore, he did not act with willful premeditation.

First-degree murder typically requires that the perpetrator had a deliberate and premeditated intent to kill. In Sal's case, while he had previously thought about killing Ken, his subsequent change of heart and accidental killing of Ken do not meet the criteria for first-degree murder.

It is possible that Sal may still face charges for a lesser offense, such as manslaughter, which involves the killing of another person without malice or premeditation. However, he is unlikely to be found guilty of first-degree murder due to the absence of willful premeditation.

Learn more about perpetrator :

https://brainly.com/question/30696229

#SPJ4

The statement is False. Encrypting a message alone does not provide protection against passive attacks. Encryption ensures that the content of the message remains confidential and unreadable to unauthorized individuals.

Encryption is the process of converting plain or readable data into a coded form to protect its confidentiality and integrity during transmission or storage. It involves the use of algorithms and cryptographic techniques to scramble the information, rendering it unreadable to unauthorized individuals. The encrypted data can only be deciphered with the corresponding decryption key or algorithm.

Encryption plays a vital role in safeguarding sensitive information, such as personal data, financial transactions, and confidential communications. It provides a secure method of communication, ensuring that only authorized parties can access and understand the information. Encryption algorithms are designed to be mathematically complex, making it extremely difficult for adversaries to break the code and gain unauthorized access to the encrypted data.

To learn more about Encryption refer to:

brainly.com/question/30225557

#SPJ4

Answer:

New York City, NY

Explanation:

"The Innocence Project, founded in 1992 by Peter Neufeld and Barry Scheck at Cardozo School of Law, exonerates the wrongly convicted through DNA testing and reforms the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice"(source: Innocence Project)

From Britney's perspective, complying with her mother's nagging to do homework is an example of negative reinforcement.

Negative reinforcement occurs when a behavior is strengthened by the removal or avoidance of an unpleasant stimulus. In this case, Britney's compliance with doing homework removes the unpleasant stimulus of her mother's nagging. It increases the likelihood that she will comply with her mother's request in the future to avoid the nagging. This is different from positive reinforcement, which occurs when a behavior is strengthened by the addition of a positive stimulus, such as a reward. Positive punishment involves adding an unpleasant stimulus to decrease a behavior, while negative punishment involves removing a pleasant stimulus to decrease a behavior.

To learn more about negative reinforcement, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29901028

#SPJ11

Answer:

Welfare and financial aid

Explanation:

These both heavily contribute to society

Hope this helps you!