Answer:This year, my annual post celebrating the Fourth of July is drawn from a chapter of Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People, and from a short essay on the same topic, The Declaration of Independence and the American Theory of Government: First Come Rights, and Then Comes Government." It also draws upon Sean Wilentz, No Property in Man: Slavery and Antislavery at the Nation's Founding]
The Declaration of Independence used to be read aloud at public gatherings every Fourth of July. Today, while all Americans have heard of it, all too few have read more than its second sentence. Yet the Declaration shows the natural rights foundation of the American Revolution, and provides important information about what the founders believed makes a constitution or government legitimate. It also raises the question of how these fundamental rights are reconciled with the idea of "the consent of the governed," another idea for which the Declaration is famous.
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the phased in abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted as well as the abolition of slavery in the Northwest Territory. The Rhode Island gradual abolition law of 1784 read:
All men are entitled to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, and the holding Mankind in a State of Slavery, as private property, which has gradually obtained by unrestrained Custom and the Permission of the Law, is repugnant to this Principle, and subversive of the Happiness of Mankind.
Later, the Declaration also assumed increasing importance in the struggle to abolish slavery. It became a lynchpin of the moral and constitutional arguments of the nineteenth-century abolitionists. As one New Yorker opposed to slavery wrote in 1797:
The right of property which every man has to his personal liberty is paramount to all the laws of property…. All I contend for at present is, that no claims of property can ever justly interfere with, or be suffered to impede the operation of that noble and eternal principle, that "all men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights–and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The Declaration was much relied upon by Abraham Lincoln and many others before him:
Without the Constitution and the Union, we could not have attained the result; but even these, are not the primary cause of our great prosperity. There is something back of these, entwining itself more closely about the human heart. That something, is the principle of "Liberty to all"–the principle that clears the path for all–gives hope to all–and, by consequence, enterprize, and industry to all.
The expression of that principle, in our Declaration of Independence, was most happy, and fortunate. Without this, as well as with it, we could have declared our independence of Great Britain; but without it, we could not, I think, have secured our free government, and consequent prosperity. No oppressed, people will fight, and endure, as our fathers did, without the promise of something better, than a mere change of masters.
The assertion of that principle, at that time, was the word, "fitly spoken" which has proved an "apple of gold" to us. The Union, and the Constitution, are the picture of silver, subsequently framed around it. The picture was made, not to conceal, or destroy the apple; but to adorn, and preserve it. The picture was made for the apple—not the apple for the picture.
The Declaration had to be explained away–quite unconvincingly–by the Supreme Court in Dred Scott. And eventually it was repudiated by some defenders of slavery in the South because of its inconsistency with that institution.
When reading the Declaration, it is worth keeping in mind two very important facts. The Declaration constituted high treason against the Crown. Every person who signed it would be executed as traitors should they be caught by the British. Second, the Declaration was considered to be a legal document by which the revolutionaries justified their actions and explained why they were not truly traitors. It represented, as it were, a literal indictment of the Crown and Parliament, in the very same way that criminals are now publicly indicted for their alleged crimes by grand juries representing "the People."
Explanation: And yeah that’s my answer
similar things between a monarchy and a republic
Answer:
Explanation:
There can be many similarities between a republic and a monarchy. First, they can have a different head of state and head of government. Germany is a republic where the head of government is held by the Chancellor (now Angela Merkel) and the head of state is held by the President (now Frank-Walter Steinmeier). The United Kingdom, is a monarchy where the head of government is held by the Prime Minister (now Theresa May) and the head of state is held by the Monarch, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II (since late 1952). Both countries adopted parliamentary system.
Answer:Government
The major similarity between monarchy and democracy is that they are both forms of government. Government is dedicated to establishing hierarchy of authority, rule of law, social order and security. With this comes government taxation, government military needs, government assistance for the poor and disabled (e.g., workhouses, pensioners homes, Welfare and food relief).
Monarchy
Monarchies are limited, also called constitutional, or absolute. In limited, or constitutional, monarchies there is a division between the governing body and the ruling body so that an independent body, usually a parliament, establishes laws, while the ruling body, the monarch, remains influential in affairs of state and public welfare. With the monarchy limited by a constitution, as Great Britain's monarchy is, the role of the monarch is defined constitutionally.
In absolute monarchies, except for monarchical advisers, there is no body other than the monarch his- or herself who makes laws and sets the governmental taxes. One thing that confuses the roles of a monarchy is that lesser heads of state, such as dukes and earls, originally had overlapping powers, such as to raise an army and to levy taxes on the people living on their land (once called peasants), but this overlap was on a lesser scale and only mimicked the absolute authority and power an absolute monarch has. Modern-day absolute monarchies exist in Saudi Arabia and in United Arab Emirates.
Monarchs are not elected nor are they appointed. Monarchs gain their power, during a peaceful succession, by hereditary right. Generally, the crown of a monarch is passed to the eldest son upon the monarch's death or abdication. If there is no son in line of succession, the crown may go to the nearest relative, sometimes to a girl, as in the case of England's Queen Elizabeth I, but often to a male relative.
During a militant succession, in which the right to rule is contested or challenged, as was usually the case in the ancient Scottish monarchy, the crown of the monarchy is passed to whoever is most powerful in the battle that ensues over the right to rule. It is during these militant successions that new dynasties or forms of government are introduced, as when Cromwell was a signature to the beheading of Charles I (January 1649) and the monarchy was deposed altogether to be replaced with short-lived republican rule in the Commonwealth of England.
Democracy
Democracies are governed by elected heads of state, usually a President or a Prime Minister. The right to make laws, levy taxes, raise a military and engage in war resides in the legislative bodies, a parliament or a congress, that have also been elected by the populace. The president or prime minister of a government works in tandem with the legislative bodies, while the court system tests and validates or challenges laws and actions that are called into question. The paramount difference between an absolute monarchy and a democratic (and/or republican) government is that there are safeguards in place in a democracy so that any action taken by a head of state or a legislative body can be challenged in the highest court and, possibly, rescinded. The flaw comes in that courts cannot ultimately be challenged; when the highest court gets it wrong, it usually stays wrong.
Power is transferred in democracies in peaceful elections that may usher in new leadership and, possibly, new ideology, as when a Communist wins an election instead of a republican in a South American democracy. It is true that the process of peaceful democratic election can be thwarted if certain groups join together to overpower or corrupt the process. This may happen in the case of a military coup or in the case of election tampering and/or intimidation. Some historians hold to the idea of election tampering in Florida during the 2000 presidential election pitting George W. Bush against Al Gore.
Explanation:
how does martin luther king fit into the big picture of history background and history intention? dk if i phrased that correctly
Answer:
King sought equality and human rights for African Americans
Explanation:
Martin Luther King was a social activist and Baptist minister who played a key role in the American civil rights movement from the mid-1950s until his assassination in 1968. King sought equality and human rights for African Americans, the economically disadvantaged and all victims of injustice through peaceful protest.
Which of the following took place in 1933 that
allowed Adolf Hitler to rise to power in
Germany?
A. He was elected as Chancellor of Germany by the people.
B. He was named Commander-In-Chief of the German Army.
C. He served as Ambassador to the United States for Germany.
D. He was chosen as Secretary of War in Germany.
4
Answer:
A. He was elected as Chancellor of Germany by the people.
Explanation:
Which are the two political ideologies that, according to Chasteen, have dominated Latin American History for the past five centuries
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The two political ideologies that according to Chasteen have dominated Latin American history for the past five centuries are nationalism and liberalism.
Nationalism is the ideology that supports an extreme love for the culture, customs, history, and values of the country, including its historical figures. Under this ideology, countries reject external intromission from foreign countries.
On the other hand, there is liberalism, in which countries open to trade and the influence of the private market, including foreign investments- although it is not the best ideology to promote and support medium and low social classes.
what is the hidden message of On The Eve Of Historic Dandi March by gandhi
Answer:
Freedom, change, and hope for the future.
Explanation:
Answer:
As salt is an essential for food and tax for it is difficult for people. So, Gandhi went against to break it. We cam see the people of India started to fight against british to gain freedom
hope it helps
please mark brainliest
Which statement is true about the Embargo Act of 1807?
the effects humans have on the South American continent to those that effect the African Continent.
THIS MIGHT NOT BE WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR! READ FIRST!
Humans have had a significant impact on both the South American and African continents. Some of the most notable effects include:
Deforestation: The clearing of forests for agriculture, timber, and other purposes has been a major problem in both South America and Africa. In South America, deforestation has been particularly severe in the Amazon rainforest, which is home to a vast diversity of plant and animal life. In Africa, deforestation has been a major factor in the loss of savannas and other important ecosystems.
Pollution: Air, water, and soil pollution are all major problems in both South America and Africa. In South America, industrial pollution is a major problem, particularly in the Amazon region. In Africa, agricultural pollution is a major problem, particularly in areas where fertilizers and pesticides are used heavily.
Overpopulation: Both South America and Africa are experiencing rapid population growth, which is putting a strain on natural resources and leading to environmental degradation. In South America, the population is expected to double by 2050. In Africa, the population is expected to triple by 2050.
Climate change: Both South America and Africa are vulnerable to the effects of climate change, such as rising sea levels, more extreme weather events, and changes in precipitation patterns. Climate change is already having a significant impact on both continents, and the effects are expected to become more severe in the future.
In addition to these general effects, there are also some specific ways in which humans have impacted South America and Africa differently. For example, the introduction of non-native species has been a major problem in South America, but it has not been as significant a problem in Africa. Similarly, the mining industry has had a major impact on the environment in South America, but it has not been as significant a problem in Africa.
Overall, humans have had a significant impact on both the South American and African continents. This impact has been both positive and negative, and it is likely to continue to grow in the future. It is important to understand the effects of human activity on these continents so that we can take steps to mitigate the negative effects and preserve the natural resources that they contain.
the government's attitude of not being interested in public health was known as_____
Governments have extra powers including quarantine, laws requiring immunization, and regulatory authorities in addition to voluntary activities and services that contribute to public health.
What is the government's role in public health?Governments have extra powers including quarantine, laws requiring immunization, and regulatory authorities in addition to voluntary activities and services that contribute to public health. Most frequently when it addresses sexual and reproductive concerns, public health frequently sparks moral debate.Major public health issues in the US include teen pregnancy, low birth weight newborns, AIDS, and other sexually transmitted diseases. 1848 A General Board of Health was established in London as a result of the Public Health Act, and it had the authority to instruct municipalities to set up local boards with the authority to address environmental squalor.States are granted any authority not expressly granted to the federal government by the Tenth Amendment, including the authority to enact laws governing public health.To learn more about government's role in public health refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14370861
#SPJ1
by what two pieces of legislation did the united states hope to apply economic pressure to avoid war with great britain?
The success of Britain with in Battle of Britain proved the courage and determination of the nation's military and citizens and enabled them to escape Nazi occupation.
How did Britain trample on American neutrality during World War II?The The US diplomatic neutrality was placed to the test during the Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815). In order to hurt their rivals' economy, France and Britain, which have been at war, each established trade restrictions. Additionally, these restrictions threatened American neutrality and hindered trade.
In an effort to win the Revolutionary War, the British focused their armies here on southern states of Georgian, South Carolina, North Carolina, & Virginia using the Southern Strategy. In the event that Britain violated American sovereignty via impressing American sailors, the United States would have the authority to declare war.
In the beginning, the British had begun the practice of impressment, that involved enlisting American sailors in the military.
To learn more about Britain violate US refer to:
brainly.com/question/10533
#SPJ4
According to his speech, the instant Frederick Douglass stepped on the shore
of England and looked into the faces of the crowd, he saw in every man a
recognition of his manhood, What did he notice a "perfect absence" of?
In his speech "The Claims of the Negro Ethnologically Considered," Frederick Douglass did not mention noticing a "perfect absence" of anything upon his arrival in England.
This speech primarily discussed the issue of race and argued against the idea that black people were inherently inferior to white people based on their supposed biological differences. It is possible that the quote you are referring to is from another speech or writing by Douglass. If you can provide more context or information, I may be able to help you better .Based on Frederick Douglas's speech, he talked about his visit to England and how he saw that everyone is equal.
For more information on biological see:
https://brainly.com/question/28584322
SPJ1
In what ways do temperance, health reforms, and phrenology offer reflections on the changes in the united states before the civil war?.
These three movements-temperance, health reforms, and phrenology in the early 19th-century America share a number of common themes. First, the middle classes became more popular with all three groups. Second, America's urban-rural split was a factor in the development of all three movements. Third, race had a part in all three movements.
Both abolition and the temperance movement emerged from the Second Great Awakening. Early in the nineteenth century, temperance evolved from moderate hard liquor consumption to complete abstinence. This reform initiative was resisted by recent urban immigrant groups from Germany and Ireland because it interfered with their cultural experiences, much like prohibition did for immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe in the 20th century. It was believed that alcohol was the root of all urban problems. Similar to other initiatives, the professed goal was barely covered by a racist element.
The Health Reform Movement also focused on the worries of the middle class about cholera and yellow fever spreading in slums populated by recent immigrants due to waste and squalor. The initiative, which promoted slum area cleansing and clean water distribution as a city government service, had some scientific foundations. Once more, the discriminatory presumption was that immigrants would not clean their own neighbourhoods without assistance from the public. The middle class at the time paid for private businesses to transport their carts and trash in clean water. Health reform was spurred by cholera anxiety. That was what the pseudoscience of phrenology claimed. The traits of an individual were defined by their head shape. Racists later used it as evidence for false racial superiority beliefs. As a result, these initiatives helped Americans in the antebellum period establish cultural norms and uphold racial hierarchies as they were.
Therefore, all the three movements helped Americans in the antebellum period define cultural norms and uphold the status quo of racial hierarchy. These initiatives gained popularity among middle-class people and were born out of the urban-rural divide.
Learn more about 'antebellum period' here:
https://brainly.com/question/27441559
#SPJ4
In 1973, a radio station broadcast a comedy monologue called "Filthy Words." This led to an extensive legal battle that ended with the U.S. Supreme Court upholding the government's right to censor broadcast media. The comedian who delivered the monologue was...
The comedian who delivered the controversial monologue in 1973 was George Carlin, who was known for pushing the boundaries of comedy.
The monologue, entitled “Filthy Words,” consisted of seven words that were deemed by the FCC to be “indecent” and inappropriate for broadcast. The monologue was aired on a radio station in New York, and the FCC fined the station for violating their regulations.
This prompted Carlin and the station to challenge the FCC’s authority to censor their programming. The case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court where the court ruled in favor of the FCC, finding that the FCC had the authority to regulate indecent language on broadcast media.
The ruling set an important precedent for the FCC’s ability to regulate broadcast media, and it still stands today.
Know more about monologue here
https://brainly.com/question/28265367#
#SPJ11
In one to two sentences, explain what the reaction of the Sioux to a good crop shows about the Sioux people.
The reaction of the Sioux to a good crop shows about the Sioux people that they were interested in the trade.
What is effect of Great Sioux Waron the natives?It shoud be noted that Cheyenne as ell as the Lakota began moving west into land belonging to smaller tribes however Most battles in the coming war would be fought "on lands those Indians had taken from other tribes since 1851".
It should be noted that this result from the effect of the resistance to the Lakotas from the local Crow tribe, which had treaty on the area however reaction of the Sioux to a good crop shows about the Sioux people that they were interested in the trade hence they were surrounded the Ghost Dancers near the Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation.
Learn more about Sioux at:
https://brainly.com/question/23936174
#SPJ1
Why did colonists use the slash-and-burn method for farming?
Answer:
To clear debris
Explanation:
The second, however, is to return nutrients to the soil via the ash of the fires. These nutrients are what allow the land to produce large quantities of food, which, in turn, make it possible for populations to settle down and build towns.
HistoryStudy Guide Essay question THANK YOU
What is the legacy and relevance of the Medieval Period to our world today?
(if you do choose to write an essay for the answer that would be soo helpful to me but bullet points that I can use for my essay is okay as well I appreciate all help :))
Answer:
Today, the period in Europe from about the year 500 through approximately 1500 CE is called the Middle Ages, or the medieval era (the word medieval comes from the Latin medium aevum, literally middle age). But of course people who lived at that time did not think of themselves as being in the middle of anything—they, like we, referred to their own time as “modern.” A seventeenth-century German historian, Christoph Keller, first came up with the idea of dividing history into ancient, medieval, and “new period.”
The cultural phenomenon called the Renaissance began in Italy during the fourteenth century and spread throughout much of Europe by the end of the sixteenth century. It involved a flowering of art and scholarly and philosophical pursuits, often inspired by a renewed interest in the Classical cultures of ancient Greece and Rome. Some historians of the nineteenth century saw the Renaissance as a sharp break with the medieval “dark ages,” a sudden burst of intellectual light after the supposed gloom and stagnation of the Middle Ages.
Which branch of government is allowed to veto a bill?
A. legislative
B. judicial
C. executive
Thanks
Don't send a link, please.
Answer:
That would be C.) The executive branch.
Explanation:
The President may veto bills Congress passes, but keep in mind Congress can also override a veto by a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. I hope this helps! :)
Place the following events in the life of Osama bin Laden into chronological order.fights against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistandeclares "war" on the United Statesterrorists associated with Al Qaeda commit attacks on U.S. embassies in Africaterrorists associated with Al Qaeda commit the attacks of September 11, 2001
Fight against the soviet invasion of Afghanistan, declare war against the United States, terrorists associated with Al Qaeda commit attacks on U.S. embassies in Africa, and Al Qaeda with terrorists commit the attacks of September 11, 2001 are the life of Osama Bin Laden on chronological order.
Osama Bin Laden was born into Saudi affluence and went on to become the head of one of the most brutal, global terrorist networks in history, declaring a self-declared holy war against the United States.
In 1979, he involved himself in fighting against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
In 1996, He relocates to the Afghan city of Jalalabad and declares war against the United States (U.S.)
In late 1998, Osama struck U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, killing 224 people and injuring many.
On Sept 11, 2001, he along with his association with Al Qaeda, hijacked planes and targeted New York's world trade center leading to 3k death and thousands of injured.
To learn more about Osama Bin Laden, follow the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1062964
#SPJ4
How did the end of the Vietnam War mark a difference in US foreign policy? A. The US had never lost a war before, making war a less favorable option B. The US required an attack on US soil first before beginning a war C. The US would not get involved in any foreign wars after it D. The US would begin new wars in Southeast Asia to prove its strength
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The US had never lost a war before, making war a less favorable option: the end of the Vietnam War marked a difference in US foreign policy. Thus, option A is the correct option.
The end of the Vietnam War marked a difference in US foreign policy in that the United States became more hesitant to engage in large-scale military interventions. Option A is the most accurate choice among the given options. The Vietnam War was a costly and divisive conflict for the United States, resulting in significant loss of life and resources without achieving the desired outcomes.
The war had a profound impact on public opinion and eroded the American people's trust in the government's decision-making regarding military engagements. As a result, there was a shift towards a more cautious approach to future military interventions, with a greater emphasis on diplomatic solutions and a reluctance to commit to protracted wars without clear objectives or popular support.
Learn more about Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/30134989
#SPJ2
to what extent was the 1862 pacific railway act responsible for westward migration
This law, which went into effect on July 1, 1862, offered federal financing and land subsidies for the building of a transcontinental railroad across the United States.
Congress routinely debated "internal improvements" in the 19th century, including whether or not to support the nation's transportation system. The desire to build a train that would traverse the entire nation was one such improvement.
Congress ordered a number of topographical surveys across the West in the 1850s to find the optimum train route, but private businesses were hesitant to take on the project without Federal aid. The Pacific Railway Act, approved by Congress in 1862, established the 32nd parallel as the first transcontinental route, authorized government bonds to finance the undertaking, and offered substantial grants of land for right-of-way.
The Act guaranteed the government's use of the railroad and telegraph line that was built from the Missouri River to the Pacific Ocean.
Learn more about Railway act at
https://brainly.com/question/1260622?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Douglass' lack of freedom and rights contradicts which excerpt from the Declaration of Independence?
The excerpt from the Declaration of Independence that Douglass' lack of freedom and rights contradicts is:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Douglass was a slave, and as such, he was not considered equal to other men by the society of his time. He was denied his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Therefore, his situation contradicts the ideals expressed in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence.
How did the French and Spanish differ in their goals for exploration?
A. The French wanted to adopt enslavement, while the Spanish were against enslaving people.
B. The French wanted to convert Native Americans to Christianity, while the Spanish wanted to create a society with religious toleration.
C. The French wanted to learn about Native American culture, while the Spanish wanted to destroy the Native American way of life.
D. The French wanted to discover gold and silver, while the Spanish wanted to establish the fur trade.
The statement ''The French wanted to learn about Native American culture, while the Spanish wanted to destroy the Native American way of life.'', is the one that states about the difference between the goals for exploration of French and Spanish colonists. Therefore, the option C holds true.
What is the significance of French and Spanish colonists?The French colonists were among the rare colonists who had settled in the American society for the primary intention of trade, and establishing healthy relationships with the Native Americans who lived in their colonies.
The Spanish colonists, on the other hand, were completely opposite in their beliefs while settling in the American colonies. However, they made the people from minor communities, such as the Native Americans as their slaves, and converted them into Christianity.
Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of French and Spanish colonists.
Learn more about French and Spanish colonists here:
https://brainly.com/question/11245633
#SPJ2
Joseph Stalin established gulags in order to:
O A. repeal unpopular collectivization policies.
O B. appease protestors following the Holodomor.
O C. use political dissidents for forced labor.
O D. conquer new territories in Eastern Europe.
HELP!!! PLEASE!!
Answer:Answer C
Explanation:
The purpose of Gulags was mainly economic and political rather than driving for illumination of supposedly interfere you’re racist like the concentration camps tried to achieve
Answer:
C
Explanation:
question which phrase describes the treatment african americans received in the years before world war ii? responses separate but equal separate but equal integrated and equal integrated and equal separate and unequal separate and unequal integrated but unequal integrated but unequal
The phrase that describes the treatment African Americans received in the years before World War II is "separate and unequal".
Under the doctrine of "separate but equal," which was upheld by the Supreme Court in the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896, racial segregation was deemed constitutional as long as separate facilities were provided for different races. However, in reality, the facilities and resources provided to African Americans were often inferior and inadequate compared to those provided to white Americans. This created a stark contrast in living conditions, education, healthcare, employment opportunities, and access to public spaces.
Despite efforts by civil rights activists and organizations to challenge segregation and discrimination, African Americans faced widespread institutionalized racism and societal prejudice. They were excluded from many aspects of public life and faced severe restrictions on their civil rights, including voting rights and legal protection.
For further information on treatment of African Americans visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9259329
#SPJ11
Why was this period called the Era of Good Feelings?
Answer:
probably because better things happened
Explanation:
what is the most likely reason why the author included the information about vikings plundering monasteries?
The wealthy locations and well-stocked fields of these places were invaded, not for any religious purpose, but rather because they were centers of wealth, according to historian Peter Sawyer.
The Vikings raided Lindisfarne in A.D. 793, plundering the monastery and slaughtering or taking captive many of the monks.
For mediaeval Christians, the raid was a great shock because it was the first time the Vikings had attacked a monastic site in Britain.
These assaults were likely launched in areas where the Vikings believed they would be successful and gain significant rewards.
The monasteries were not as well protected as the commerce towns and frequently housed significant sums of ecclesiastical silver.
The Vikings stormed the monastery and destroyed it, slaughtering many English monks in the process.
Hence, the plundering of a house of God by pagans was seen by the Christian citizens of England as a grave sin, even more so than if they were merely foreigners.
To know more about vikings, visit;
https://brainly.com/question/449407
#SPJ4
What is the Age of Enlightenment ?
Answer:
Its in my explanation
Explanation:
Age of Enlightenment Eighteenth was the century period of scientific and philosophical innovation. People investigated human nature and explained reality through rationalism, the notion that truth comes only through rational, logical thinking. This period formed the basis of modern science.
Which government leader is most likely to change the policies of a public school?
A. major
B. president Previous
C. state representative
D. Supreme Court justice
state representative is the government leader is most likely to change the policies of a public school. Hence, option C is correct.
What is state representative?Each representative, also known as a congressman or congresswoman, is chosen by the citizens of a certain congressional district to serve a two-year term. Representatives participate in committee work, present legislation and resolutions, and propose modifications.
Every state is guaranteed at least one seat in the House of Representatives, with representation in the chamber roughly proportional to its population. There are 435 voting representatives in office right now.
Each U.S. House of Representatives member represents a Congressional District, or area of their state, with an average population of 700,000. However, senators speak for the entire state.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about state representative, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13246446
#SPJ5
lyndon johnson's political downfall resulted primarily from question 1 options: his refusal to be a cold warrior. his obsession with the vietnam war. his advocacy of welfare programs. the failure of his great society.
The Lyndon Johnson's political downfall resulted primarily from his obsession with the Vietnam War.
Johnson's escalation of the war, which resulted in a large number of casualties and protests at home, ultimately led to a loss of public support and political legitimacy. Additionally, his failure to effectively address other domestic issues, such as civil rights and poverty, also contributed to his downfall.
Johnson's administration was marked by his increasing involvement in the Vietnam War, which was highly controversial and unpopular among the American public. This led to widespread protests and dissatisfaction with his leadership, ultimately resulting in his political downfall.
To Know more about Vietnam War.
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP!!
What happened when subsistence farmers were pressured to groW cotton ?
Answer:
As population grew, there was difficulty keeping up with the demand for food.
Explanation:
Not enough farmers growing food
After the 1968 assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.: A. deep divisions within the Democratic Party were exposed. B. President Lyndon Johnson was pressured not to run for reelection. C. riots broke out across the nation in protest of unfair housing policies. D. groups of student protestors occupied buildings at universities.
Sorry I just can't seem to get these
Answer:
The Answer is C. Riots broke out across the nation in protest of unfair housing policies.
Explanation:
I just did the test