In the alternative, San Diego and Orange County request the right to charge a $10,000 visa tax for any and all humans of any age, race, nationality or gender crossing into their counties without the proper federal visa documentation.
The peoples of San Diego and Orange county cite the following damages to their local environment, communities, citizens and public systems: Loss of minimum wage/low skill jobs for the youth, part-time workers and elderly, property crime, identity theft , drug crimes, DUI’s, assault and battery, sexual assaults and murder increases. Private businesses, particularly in border areas, have closed due to increasing and unabated crime. Public schools and hospitals are too overcrowded and underfunded to handle the non-paying patient increase. Many crossing the borders have the highly contagious Covid virus's or other communicable diseases that will require taxpayers to sacrifice significant tax dollars be expended on non citizens, while taxpaying citizen needs go unmet. Police and Fire departments are understaffed and underfunded to handle the large influx of population. Homeschooling has increased 30% in recent years due to the lack of school security and proper student-teacher ratios. All essential taxpayer services in the area of housing, health care, schooling and safety(police and fire) are being diverted from taxpaying Americans who include the very poor and homeless in order to assist those crossing into the state illegally. Tax revenues are finite but the need for the services grows exponentially every year due to this situation. Over the past 10 years the total costs from losses in wages, property, and lives has been estimated to be over $500B per day in the U.S. with no noticeable net increase to the tax collections derived from the illegal border crossings. While many of folks crossings hold jobs, over half of their income is sent back to their home countries and is not spent benefiting the U.S. economy.
What recourse does the bordering country of Mexico, San Diego and Orange Counties have and under what Jurisdiction and law?

The correct answer for customer listing to be considered PII would be John Smith – DOB 1/1/1965.

Any representation of information that enables the identity of an individual to whom the information applies to be logically deduced by either direct or indirect means is referred to as personal identifiable information (PII).

PII refers to any data on a person kept by an organization, including (1) any details that can be used to identify or trace a person, including a name, social security number, birthdate, place of birth, mother's maiden name, or biometric data.

To know more about PII visit-

https://brainly.com/question/30023988

#SPJ1

Answer:

For long it has been the received opinion that judges filled in the gaps left by rules by using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion. "In these cases it is clear", Hart has said, "that the rule-making authority must exercise discretion, and there is no possibility of treating the question raised by the various cases as if there were one uniquely correct answer to be found, as distinct from an answer which is a reasonable compromise between many conflicting interests". A competing view was espoused by the realists who placed absolute emphasis on the discretion of judges and relegated the "rules" to an obscure position. Earlier, little attention was paid to the analysis of discretion. However, a determined effort has been made lately by Ronald Dworkin, who has cast serious doubts on the orthodox opinion and has emerged as the principal opponent of Hart. Dworkin's views have posed a sustained challenge to the positivist account and have received critical acclaim by leading jurists of the world.

Answer:

F

Explanation:

When a defendant is convicted of a crime, in addition to serving a sentence, the court may also order that any property used or gained from the criminal activity be confiscated. This legal mechanism is known as forfeiture.

Forfeiture can occur in two ways. The first is criminal forfeiture, which occurs as part of the criminal proceeding against the defendant. In this type of forfeiture, the government must prove that the property in question was used to commit the crime or was obtained through illegal means. If the government is successful, the court may order the property to be forfeited.

The second type of forfeiture is civil forfeiture, which is a separate legal proceeding initiated by the government against the property itself. In a civil forfeiture, the government must show that the property in question is subject to forfeiture because it was either used to commit a crime or was obtained through illegal means. Unlike criminal forfeiture, civil forfeiture does not require a criminal conviction.

Forfeiture serves several purposes. One is to deprive criminals of the profits from their illegal activities. It also serves as a deterrent to future criminal conduct. Forfeiture proceeds are often used to fund law enforcement efforts, including investigations and prosecutions of other criminal activity.

However, forfeiture has been criticized for its potential to be abused, particularly in cases where the property owner may be innocent or there are insufficient safeguards to protect property rights. As such, forfeiture laws and procedures have been the subject of ongoing debate and reform efforts.

learn more about legal mechanism here

https://brainly.com/question/30000460

#SPJ11

When a lapsed policy's premium has been paid current, it has the potential of being reinstated.

"Lapsed" refers to a policy that has expired or been terminated due to non-payment of premiums. If the policyholder fails to pay the premiums within the specified grace period, the policy may lapse.

However, if the policyholder subsequently pays the outstanding premium amount and any applicable penalties or fees, the insurance company may agree to reinstate the policy. Reinstatement allows the policy to be brought back into force as if it had never lapsed.

Reinstating a lapsed policy provides the policyholder with the opportunity to regain the insurance coverage and benefits that were previously in effect. It is important to note that the reinstatement process may have certain conditions or restrictions, and it is subject to the insurance company's policies and approval.

By paying the overdue premium and fulfilling any necessary requirements, the policyholder can potentially reinstate the lapsed policy and continue receiving the benefits and protections provided by the insurance coverage.

To know more about policyholder, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30410405#
#SPJ11

Answer:

individual occupational crime

Terrorism is the major threat that has changed the purpose of criminal justice organizations.

A peaceful, accountable, and legitimate response to terrorism can be provided by counter-terrorism initiatives that are based on an effective and open criminal justice system that upholds human rights and the rule of law. This kind of response by the criminal justice system to terrorism can help prevent or reduce the risk of using force in an unreasonable and/or illegal way outside of the safeguards and procedural guarantees provided by the due process of law. Even under terrorist threats, it can bolster a society's commitment to human rights and the rule of law.

The criminal justice system has a challenging role to play in the fight against terrorism. Indeed, the prevention of terrorist attacks must be the primary goal of counterterrorism strategies, and in some instances, law enforcement agencies are able to prevent terrorist attacks. However, when it comes to preventing terrorist conspiracies from achieving their goal or when a terrorist threat is too extensive for resources to handle, some of the current criminal justice practices are less effective . To implement all of the recommended measures for the law enforcement and criminal justice systems with the necessary levels of technical capacity, however, there may be significant accompanying challenges, particularly for States with lower levels of financial resources.

To know more about Terrorism and Criminal Justice visit

brainly.com/question/5171715

#SPJ4

The energy to sue, notification necessities, public remark durations, and responses to comments are reflections of the "privileged role" of the public below CEQA.

(California Environmental Quality Act), CEQA is a country law in California that ambitions to protect the surroundings and sell public participation in the selection-making process for tasks that can have full-size environmental influences. These factors are all necessary components of CEQA's framework to make sure transparency and accountability.

The energy to sue lets people and companies assign tasks that they believe violate CEQA requirements. Notification requirements make sure that potentially affected events are knowledgeable approximately proposed initiatives and have the possibility to participate in the process.

Public comment durations offer a platform for the general public to express their perspectives, issues, and guidelines regarding the undertaking's environmental effects. Responses to feedback ensure that undertaking proponents deal with the remarks acquired during the public comment period.

Together, those factors empower the public, recognizing their proper to be concerned in decisions that can impact their environment and excellent existence. They contribute to CEQA's aim of fostering knowledgeable decision-making and promoting environmental stewardship via public engagement.

To know more about CEQA,

https://brainly.com/question/31459504

#SPJ4

Answer:

what is the meaning of question

A warning sign is a particular kind of sign that alerts the viewer to a potential risk, impediment, or circumstance that calls for extra care.

A driver may not immediately notice some of the hazards that are indicated by traffic signs on the sides of the road. At the Turin Automobile Museum, there are primarily warning signs on display (along with some control signs like Do Not Enter). Shape and colours of the utilised road warning sign are: Uses Uses Uses Uses Uses, previously used has utilised in the past, utilises several, absent any data. The shapes of warning traffic signs can vary, but they typically have an equilateral triangle shape with a white background and a heavy red border. They have a yellow backdrop and a black border in the People's Republic of China (Macau and Hong Kong are the exceptions).

Learn more about Republic here:

https://brainly.com/question/9368597

#SPJ4

A Proposition of Policy Speech makes a persuasive argument about a course of action regarding a controversial topic of social or public concern.

While the proposition is based on some value premise, the focus of the discussion is not necessarily on this underlying premise, but more on the desirability and ability to act.

Policies are a set of general guidelines. They outline your organization's plan for tackling certain issues. The purpose of policies is to communicate an organization’s values, philosophy, and culture.

The term may apply to government, public sector organizations and groups, as well as individuals, Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from rules or law.

Learn more about Policies here,

https://brainly.com/question/3521988

#SPJ1

The number on the given map that shows the location of Florida in the United States is 1.

Florida is located to the South-Eastern part of the United States where it is a peninsula that extends downwards.

It is located above Cuba which is labeled as 2 which means that Florida is denoted by the number, 1.

Find out more on Florida at https://brainly.com/question/6590614.

#SPJ1

C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court

An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.

To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here

https://brainly.com/question/33718034

#SPJ11

According to the lecture, in civil cases, the burden of proof that must be met to hold the defendant liable for the legal harm is preponderance of the evidence. Preponderance of the evidence means that the evidence presented by the plaintiff is more convincing and more likely to be true than the evidence presented by the defendant.

The plaintiff must show that it is more likely than not that the defendant is liable for the harm that was caused. This means that the plaintiff does not need to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt like in a criminal case.

In civil cases, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove their case, and they must prove it with evidence that is more likely than not to be true. This is different from criminal cases, where the prosecution must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, and the burden of proof is on the prosecution.

you know more about Preponderance pls visit-

https://brainly.com/question/30156475

#SPJ11

The CPD can reduce the 15% polling requirement and allow third party candidates to debate with the top two parties to avoid lawsuits and confrontations.

What does Lawsuit means?

A lawsuit is a civil action brought in a court of law by a plaintiff against a defendant, alleging that the defendant has committed a legal wrong. It is a dispute between two or more parties that seeks legal relief in the form of a judgment for damages, an injunction, or other court order.

What does Injunction mean?

An injunction forbids someone from doing something. It is an example of an equitable remedy. Injunctions are commonly used to prevent one party from doing something that could cause irreparable harm to another. For example, a court may issue an injunction to prevent a person from disposing of assets or engaging in activities that could jeopardize the legal rights of another party.

To know more about  Injunction,

https://brainly.com/question/28452554

#SPJ1

If the court could indeed find any sources of law that demonstrate or direct their decision to dismiss the suit, the court should then seek guidance from secondary sources of law.

Therefore, if the court could indeed find any legal sources that maintain or direct their decision to dismiss the suit, the court should then seek guidance from secondary sources of law.

Know more about secondary sources of law here:

https://brainly.com/question/26410745

#SPJ4

The complete question is given below:

If the court cannot find any sources of law that establish or direct their decision to dismiss the suit, the court should then turn to _________ sources of law for guidance.

Answer:

A: Senate

B: The House of Representatives

C: Senate

D: The House of Representatives

E: The House of Representatives

F: Both

G: Senate

H: Both

I: The House of Representatives

J: Senate

K: The House of Representatives

The House, according to the Constitution, represents citizens based on district populations, whereas the Senate represents citizens on an equal state basis.

The United States Congress is made up of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.

Members of the House of Representatives serve two-year terms and are re-elected every even year. Senators, on the other hand, serve six-year terms, and elections to the Senate are staggered over even years, so that only about one-third of the Senate is up for reelection at any given time.

The responses to the given questions are

To learn more about The House of Representatives

https://brainly.com/question/747415

#SPJ2

In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.

An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.

If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.

To know more about proceedings:

https://brainly.com/question/29791715

#SPJ11

Answer: The fraud examiner would like to determine who is responsible for known losses occurring in a certain area.

Explanation:

A Fraud Examiner is an individual that resolves allegations regarding fraud, takes statements, gets evidences and also testifies to findings so that issues regarding fraud can be solved.

Based on the options given, the most favorable reaosn to conduct a covert examination would be so that the fraud examiner would like to determine who is responsible for known losses occurring in a certain area.

Answer: nothing; because Sam is an independent contractor.

Explanation:

Under the law of agency, an agency is created when an authority is delegated from one individual to another individual whereby such person is appointed to do a particular job.

Based on the information given, Joe is not liable liable to the passer-by because Sam is an independent contractor as he was contracted to Casey out a task. If he was an employee of Joe, then he will be liable.

Answer:

job availability

Explanation:

many people that went in prison have difficulty finding Employment and the majority 70% felt that criminal records have effect on their job search 2 months of the been released 40% of respondents have been employed at some point since leaving prison but only 31% were currently employed.

one study found that that white job applicants with a criminal record are of half likely to be called back for an interview black applicants are less likely to be called back in general but those with a record called back on your third as often as peers.

also background checks go back 7 years different type of background checks look different results and cover different lengths of time in Canadian personal history in general background checks that typically cover 7 years of Criminal and court records but can't go back any further depending on complication and laws of what's been searched.

Answer:

job availabolty

Explanation:

trust am a Hardvard student

The  legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.

Conservatism in the United States is seen as a form of a political and social philosophy that is known to be based on traditionalism as well as republicanism, and hindered by the federal governmental power in association to U.S. states.

Note that The  legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.

Learn more about Supreme Court  from

https://brainly.com/question/15111973

#SPJ1

Answer:

The word used to describe the impact of a news report that causes people to change their opinions is "influential."

Answer:

c. determine the budget

hope this helps!

Explanation:

Answer:

If I were the prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and Lincoln with accessory after the fact to first degree murder. However, I would cut a deal with both Tommy and Lincoln to testify against the teacher, Darla. Although Tommy did commit and was found guilt of a murder, Tommy is only fifteen years old. He was also seduced, manipulated, and touched by his teacher. In all 50 states of the United States of America, the age of consent is 16, 17, or 18. This means that in all 50 states, Darla is also guilty of statutory r a p e, along with multiple states having even harsher punishments for adults who use their role as an educator, coesunelor, or parental guardian to se xually take advantage of a minor. As a prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and go after her as the prime target. Tommy can have his sentenced reduced. As Darla's defense attorney, the entire case against her is circumstantial and lies solely on the testimony of especially Tommy and also Lincoln. I can argue that Darla, never told Tommy to kill her husband, but that she just informed Tommy the only way they could be together forever is if her husband was out of the picture. Tommy easily could have located the firearm in her house, take the gun, and then killed her husband so that he could be with his teacher forever. The entire case lies on a jury believing a convicted murderer, or a teacher who at this point, has no criminal record that we know of.

Explanation:

The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.

The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.

The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.

It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.

Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014

#SPJ1

Advocacy refers to the act of promoting or supporting a particular cause or issue. There are various types of advocacy, including professional and public-domain advocacy.

Professional advocacy involves advocating for a specific profession or industry. This type of advocacy is typically carried out by professional associations, trade unions, or other organizations that represent the interests of a particular group of professionals. Professional advocacy may include lobbying for policy changes, providing educational resources and support for professionals, and promoting the value and importance of the profession.

Public domain advocacy, on the other hand, focuses on advocating for issues that affect the general public. This type of advocacy is carried out by non-profit organizations, activists, and community groups. Public-domain advocacy may involve campaigning for social justice, environmental protection, human rights, or other issues that impact society as a whole. The goal of public domain advocacy is to raise awareness, promote change, and create a better world for everyone.

Overall, both types of advocacy play an important role in promoting positive change and making a difference in the world. Whether it's advocating for the rights of professionals or for the well-being of society as a whole, advocacy is an essential tool for creating a better future.
The meaning of types of advocacy: professional and public domains refers to the different categories of advocacy practices that can be distinguished by their context, either within a professional setting or in the public domain.

Professional advocacy involves advocating for the interests of a specific profession, its members, or clients within that profession. This type of advocacy typically includes lobbying for policy changes, promoting professional standards, and protecting the rights of professionals and their clients. Examples of professional advocacy can be found in healthcare, education, and social work, where professionals advocate for better resources, funding, and policies to support their work and the people they serve.

Public domain advocacy, on the other hand, involves advocating for the general public's interests, often on broader social, political, or environmental issues. This type of advocacy can take place through grassroots movements, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), or individual activists working to raise awareness, influence public opinion, and create positive change. Examples of public-domain advocacy include campaigns for human rights, environmental protection, and social justice.

In summary, the types of advocacy—professional and public domains—refer to the distinct ways advocacy can be practiced depending on the context, whether it's within a specific profession or focused on broader societal concerns.

To know more about advocacy visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31316893

#SPJ11

Casey was not found guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a kid. She WAS found guilty of 4 misdemeanor counts of providing false information to law enforcement though.

Hope this helps!!!! : D