Answers
The act of making false claims about another person that harms their reputation is known as defamation. Libel occurs when a defamatory comment is published or broadcast in the media; slander occurs when it is just said.
Slander is a felony according to Sections 499 and 500 of the 1860 Code. Criminal defamation is a non-cognizable, compoundable offence that is bailable. A person who engages in criminal defamation may be punished with a fine, a period of up to two years' simple imprisonment, or both. Slander falls under the same two categories as libel: slander and slander per se. Libel per se is the written equivalent of slander per se, which is a false statement that is so blatantly detrimental that reputational loss to the plaintiff is anticipated.
To learn more about defamation click the link below:
brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ4
Related Questions
The bomb has been planted
Answers
In the case of Fletcher v. Peck (1810), Georgia sold large tracts of land to speculators in 1795. A few years later, the Georgia legislature voided the sale in response to public outcry that the original agreement was conducted with bribes. In the intervening period, Robert Fletcher, a land speculator, had purchased a tract of land from John Peck, who had acquired the land from the original agreement in 1795. Fletcher took Peck to court, arguing that he had no right to sell the land and that the sale was a breach of contract. The Court's decision favored Peck based on the argument that bills of attainder and ex post facto laws are unconstitutional. Why is the Supreme Court's decision in the scenario one that reflects judicial restraint
Answers
Answer:
Because the court did not review the events and laws that govern the process.
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, Fletcher bought land from Peck before legislation that prohibited the sale of land to speculators was enforced. This means that he made this purchase when this practice was still legal, although there was a clamor for this activity to end. However, Fletcher decided to go to the federal supreme court stating that the purchase was illegal. However, the Court stated that this case was an ex post facto law, which they considered invalid, unconstitutional. This is a type of law with retroactive effects, where its effects work on the facts that happened before its ratification. Thus, the court refused to make a judicial review of these facts, promoting an example of judicial restraint.
Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi are in the ______ circuit. There are ______ circuits in the Circuit Courts of Appeals.
Answers
Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi are in the Fifth Circuit. There are thirteen circuits in the Circuit Courts of Appeals.
The Circuit Court of Appeals is the intermediate appellate court in the US Federal Court system, which hears appeals from the Federal district courts as well as other Federal courts and agencies. This court is divided into thirteen different circuits, each of which is responsible for a specific geographical region or territory within the United States.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is one of the thirteen Circuit Courts of Appeals in the United States. It is composed of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The circuit covers an area of 153,923 square miles, including 20 million people, 26 US district courts, and 5,479 active judges.
The thirteen circuits are geographically based. Each circuit has a number of district courts within its borders. The courts of appeal, as part of the Federal judicial system, are responsible for handling appeals from district courts. Appeals from the decisions of the Court of Appeals go directly to the Supreme Court. Hence, the Circuit Courts of Appeals are one step away from the Supreme Court of the United States.
In summary, the Fifth Circuit contains Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi while there are thirteen circuits in the Circuit Courts of Appeals.
Learn more about the Circuit Courts of Appeals: https://brainly.com/question/15150747
#SPJ11
im am verrrrryyyy lost can some one help me
Answers
Answer:
I wish I could, but it make no sense!
Explanation:
Defendant is accused of the wrong doing?
Answers
If you are a student in a legal studies department, is your department’s curriculum consistent with SCOP or AAfPE guidelines?
Answers
As a student in a legal studies department, it is important to ensure that your department's curriculum is consistent with the guidelines set forth by both the Society for Corporate and Organizational Planning (SCOP) and the American Association for Paralegal Education (AAfPE).
Both of these organizations provide guidelines and standards for legal studies programs to ensure that students receive a quality education that prepares them for careers in the legal field.
To determine if your department's curriculum is consistent with SCOP and AAfPE guidelines, you can review the course offerings and program requirements for your legal studies department. Compare these with the guidelines provided by SCOP and AAfPE to see if there are any discrepancies or areas that need improvement.
Additionally, you can speak with faculty members or program advisors to ask about the department's adherence to these guidelines.
In conclusion, as a student in a legal studies department, it is important to ensure that your department's curriculum is consistent with SCOP and AAfPE guidelines in order to receive a quality education that prepares you for a career in the legal field.
To know more about Paralegal education, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/25507890#
#SPJ11
Why do you think some people opposed new deal policies? check all of the boxes that apply.
Answers
Some people opposed new deal policies because they thought that the New Deal didn't provide enough economic opportunity.
They believed that there weren't enough economic opportunities offered by the New Deal. They believed that there was not enough wealth redistribution under the New Deal. They believed that the social services offered under the New Deal were insufficient.
People's opposition to the new deal measures was motivated by a variety of factors. Despite the fact that the new arrangement included a lot of advantages, some individuals felt that it did not go far enough in terms of assisting the populace. Additionally, they believed that the government shouldn't become involved in union-related matters.
To learn more about New deal visit: https://brainly.com/question/22480124
#SPJ4
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
Answers
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
Which option is an example of a low-risk investment?
A.
Hedge funds
B.
Mutual funds
C.
Bonds
D.
Stocks
Answers
Answer:
C. Bonds
Explanation:
A P E X
Savings accounts, cash ISAs, annuities, government bonds and protected funds are considered low risk investments. Cash is the most stable investment option, but the returns are not usually as high as fixed-interest securities.
Correct option is C.
"Bonds" are an example of a low-risk investment.
A bond is a financial instrument that allows an investor to lend money to a borrower, such as a corporation or the government. The money is used to fund the borrower's operations, and the investor is paid interest on the investment. A bond's market value might fluctuate over time.
To know more about Low-risk investment, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/25264302
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
Answers
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
What is your feeling on sentencing guidelines ,and do you believe they are used the same in every case before the court
Answers
Sentencing guidelines are useful for optimizing and speeding up some legal processes, however, we cannot believe that they are used in the same way in all court cases.
What are the sentencing guidelines?They are legal standards.These are guidelines for judges.They are descriptions of how certain criminal cases should be evaluated.Sentencing guidelines are very useful and speed up the legal process by allowing standards of assessment that allow greater clarity in assessing the nature and seriousness of the crime, helping to finalize the case.
However, as these cases have different characteristics and many different elements, the sentencing guidelines cannot be used in the same way in all cases and must adapt to each situation.
Learn more about sentencing guidelines:
https://brainly.com/question/31547228
#SPJ1
When talking about an armed robbery case, a discussion about how explosives are made started. How can the discussion about explosives BEST be described in relation to the armed robbery case?
A.
relevant
B.
irrelevant
C.
interesting
D.
sophisticated
Answers
Answer:
Answer choice (B)
Explanation:
The discussion about explosives in relation to an armed robbery case can be considered as irrelevant unless there is evidence or suspicion that the perpetrator(s) used explosives in the commission of the crime. Otherwise, the discussion about explosives would not have any direct connection or relevance to the armed robbery case.
I Promise it's worth a lot of points
Mock Trial
identify and summarize each of the following individual role.
plaintiff + defendant
lawyers
witnesses
judge
jury
Write a 1 To 2 Paragraph exploring what the conversation may have been while the jury was deliberating. what did they discuss? How did they reach a conclusion?
Answers
defendant - In a civil suit, the person complained against; in a criminal case, the person accused of the crime.
A lawyer (also called attorney, counsel, or counselor) is a licensed professional who advises and represents others in legal matter
witness - A person called upon by either side in a lawsuit to give testimony before the court or jury.
judge - Government official with authority to decide lawsuits brought before courts. Judicial officers of the Supreme Court and the highest court in each state are called justices.
jury - Persons selected according to law and sworn to inquire into and declare a verdict on matters of fact. State court juries can be as small as six jurors in some cases. Federal juries for civil suits must have six jurors criminal suits must have twelve.
Trial
After many weeks or months of preparation, the prosecutor is ready for the most important part of his job: the trial. The trial is a structured process where the facts of a case are presented to a jury, and they decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charge offered. During trial, the prosecutor uses witnesses and evidence to prove to the jury that the defendant committed the crime(s). The defendant, represented by an attorney, also tells his side of the story using witnesses and evidence.
In a trial, the judge — the impartial person in charge of the trial — decides what evidence can be shown to the jury. A judge is similar to a referee in a game, they are not there to play for one side or the other but to make sure the entire process is played fairly.
Jury Instructions
Following the closing arguments, the judge “charges the jury,” or informs them of the appropriate law and of what they must do to reach a verdict.
Jury Deliberations & Announcement of the Verdict
After being charged, the jury goes into deliberation, the process of deciding whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty. During this process, no one associated with the trial can contact the jury without the judges and lawyers. If the jury has a question on the law, they must write a note to the judge, which the judge will read in court with all parties present. In federal criminal trials, the jury must reach a unanimous decision in order to convict the defendant.
After they reach an agreement on a verdict, they notify the judge, the lawyers, and the defendant in open court. Everyone is present in court for the reading of the verdict. The United States Marshals Service is present during trial to protect the judge and prosecutors from potential harm. If the defendant is found not guilty, they are usually free to go home.
Should the Supreme Court set a time frame for a “speedy trial”?
Answers
Which of the following is a reason for the problems that plague jails
Answers
You didn't give a list, but here are some reasons! Overcrowding: Jails are often overcrowded, making it difficult to maintain a safe and healthy environment for both staff and inmates.
Staffing shortages: A shortage of trained and qualified staff can lead to increased violence and disorder within the jail.
Budget constraints: Jails often operate on limited budgets, which can result in insufficient resources for programs and services that can reduce recidivism.
Mental health issues: A significant number of people in jail have mental health problems, which can create challenges for staff and negatively impact the overall operation of the jail.
Substance abuse: Substance abuse is a major problem in many jails, leading to a range of health and safety issues.
Lack of rehabilitation programs: Jails often lack programs and services that can help inmates improve their lives and reduce their risk of reoffending.
Lack of technology: Inadequate technology can result in ineffective communication, security, and management of the jail.
what could explain why the wilmot proviso passed in the house but did not pass in the senate?
Answers
The Wilmot Proviso was a proposal in 1846 that aimed to prohibit slavery in any territory gained from the Mexican-American War. The bill passed the House of Representatives but failed to pass in the Senate.
One possible explanation for this discrepancy is the difference in the political landscape of the two chambers. The House of Representatives was dominated by Northern Democrats and Whigs who opposed the expansion of slavery, whereas the Senate had a more balanced representation between the North and the South.
Additionally, there were several factors that contributed to the failure of the Wilmot Proviso in the Senate, including the influence of Southern Democrats who were pro-slavery, the intense sectionalism between the North and South, and the Senate's procedural rules, which allowed the minority to block legislation.
Overall, the failure of the Wilmot Proviso in the Senate highlights the deep political divisions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and the difficulty of passing anti-slavery legislation in a highly polarized Congress.
To know more about Wilmot Proviso visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12552227
#SPJ11
Describe the mediation procedure adopted by the U.S. Court of
Appeals
Answers
The U.S. Court of Appeals' mediation procedure entails the involvement of a neutral third party, or mediator, to help the parties come to a mutually agreeable resolution of their differences.
Are mediation and its use explicitly governed by domestic laws? There is no governing or regulatory body for mediation in the United States. Standards that are respected in the mediation process are provided by organisations like the American Bar Association and the American Arbitration Association. Legal conflicts can sometimes be resolved through mediation. Unless the parties sign a settlement agreement, often known as a mediation agreement, mediation is not legally binding. If a judge orders mediation, it can also be legally binding.
Read more about mediation court at
https://brainly.com/question/30366364
#SPJ4
Is a DUI Fatality Manslaughter or Murder
Answers
Answer:
murder
Explanation:
tehehehthththh
A recession causes the demand for jelly beans to fall. What happens to equilibrium price
and equilibrium quantity of jelly beans?
O Price Increases and Quantity Decreases
O Price Decreases and Quantity Increases
O Price and Quantity Decrease
Price and Quantity Increase
Answers
As a result of the recession causing the demand for jelly beans to fall, the effect on the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity is Price and Quantity Decrease.
When demand falls in a market for a certain good, then the demand curve would shift to the left. As a result of this shift, the demand curve would intersect the supply curve at a lower price and quantity level.
The reason this happens is that as less people demand the jelly beans, suppliers will produce less jelly beans and reduce the prices to encourage more people to buy which leads to a fall in both equilibrium price and quantity.
What is the equilibrium price?The equilibrium price in a market refers to the price of goods and services where the quantity supplied in the market is equal to the quantity demanded.
If demand falls in a market for a certain good, then the demand curve would shift to the left. As a result of this shift, the demand curve would intersect the supply curve at a lower price and quantity level.
This is as a result of less people demanding the jelly beans, suppliers will produce less jelly beans and reduce the prices to encourage more people to buy which leads to a fall in both equilibrium price and quantity.
Find out more on the effect of a fall in demand at https://brainly.com/question/24087897
#SPJ1
2. Locate two examples of programs used to promote the community policing philosophy from two different police departments in
Indiana (one program from each department).
Answers
The artificial cell was created by a team of researchers led by Dr. Xiangyu Liu at the University of California, San Diego. The team used a combination of synthetic DNA, proteins, and lipids to build the cell from scratch, replicating the complex processes that occur in natural cells. The resulting cell is capable of self-replication, a key characteristic of living organisms.
The creation of an artificial cell has significant implications for a wide range of fields. One potential application is in the production of biofuels, with synthetic cells potentially being used to produce renewable energy sources. The technology could also have significant implications for medicine, with artificial cells potentially being used to create new treatments for a range of diseases. The development of synthetic cells could also help scientists better understand the fundamental processes that occur within living organisms, potentially leading to new insights into the origins of life itself.
PS I love you. And i asked the Ask AI app to write this for me. Get it for free --> https://get-askai.app
who is my celibrety crush its somone on fututama
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Im not sure but im gonna say Zoidberg
In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated
perjury.
O True
O False
Answers
The statement that "In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated perjury," is False.
What happens when a witness does not answer a question in Texan courts?In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions can be held in contempt of court for refusing to testify or failing to answer a question. This is not the same as aggravated perjury, which involves giving false testimony under oath with the intent to deceive or mislead.
Aggravated perjury is a serious offense in Texas and can result in significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
Find out more on perjury at https://brainly.com/question/30312181
#SPJ1
There Are 2 types of distracted drivers which 2 types of drivers are they
Answers
Answer:
the 2 types are Visual and Manual drivers
Answer:
There are three main types of distraction:
Visual: taking your eyes off the road. Manual: taking your hands off the wheel. Cognitive: taking your mind off driving.Explanation:
Hope it helps^^
Pretend you are the world's leading expert in all things Critical Incident Management. Because of your expertise, you often consult with businesses about emergency preparedness. Create a document to summarize what an Executive Policy Group is as well as why a business should have one. For this exercise we will pretend you are presenting to a new Tech company, breaking into the social media world with a new platform. Company has 100 employees total. Your proposal for the business's EPG should be a page or more in length.
Answers
An Executive Policy Group (EPG) is a critical component of a business's overall emergency preparedness strategy, particularly for a tech company like yours, entering the competitive social media platform market. With a workforce of 100 employees, establishing an EPG helps to ensure your organization is well-prepared for any potential critical incidents.
An EPG is a team of senior executives and key decision-makers responsible for developing, implementing, and maintaining a comprehensive emergency response plan. This group ensures that the organization is well-equipped to handle critical incidents effectively and efficiently while minimizing potential impacts on operations, staff, and customers. Having an EPG is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it ensures a systematic and coordinated response to emergencies, enabling your company to react promptly and minimize potential damage. Secondly, it demonstrates a commitment to employee safety and security, fostering a positive work environment and attracting top talent. Thirdly, it safeguards the company's reputation and brand image by showing stakeholders that your organization takes crisis management seriously.
Learn more about Executive here:
https://brainly.com/question/31129751
#SPJ11
state a principle about the influence of pride
Answers
formal action in a lawsuit begins when the plaintiff files a _______.
Answers
In order to start a civil action in federal court, the plaintiff must file a complaint with the court and "serve" a copy of the complaint on the defendant.
What exactly is a federal civil case?A legal disagreement involving two or more parties takes place in a federal civil case. A civil action starts when one of the parties files a complaint and pays the filing fee required by law. An application to proceed in forma pauperis may be submitted by a plaintiff who is unable to pay the filing fee.
Why would a civil dispute be tried in federal court?A case may be heard by a federal court, for instance, if it concerns a federal issue or results from federal law. Cases involving federal law are heard by a federal court.
To know more about civil lawsuit in federal court, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13979099
#SPJ1
What is the legal threshold in criminal court needed in order for the prosecution to secure a conviction?.
Answers
Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal burden of proof required to affirm a conviction in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt.
Commonly, the prosecution has the weight of proving every detail of a criminal offense beyond an affordable doubt. But at the same time as a defendant is not required to show innocence on the way to avoid conviction, the prosecution also would not need to show guilt to the point of absolute actuality.
One factor this is manifest of primary importance is the real or capacity impact of the offense at the network and on the victim(s). The character and seriousness of the offense may include a consideration of countrywide safety interests.
Learn more about law here https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
Black American men were granted suffrage before American women.
True
False
Answers
Answer:false
Explanation:
Black men were given voting rights in 1870, while black women were effectively banned until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Which of the following is a philosophical question?
Who do you spend the most time with?
What is friendship?
On average, how many people get married every month?
How many friends do you have on social media?
Answers
Answer:
What is friendship?
Explanation:
A philosophical question are those questions in which there are no direct answers such as yes or no and which the answers are open for debate, rational and can be argued.
Therefore, from the given answer choices, the example of a philosophical question is "What is friendship?"
The _____ stated that not only would the united states prohibit non-american intervention in latin american affairs, but it would also police the area and guarantee that latin american nations met their international obligations.
Answers
The Roosevelt Corollary stated that not only would the United States prohibit non-American intervention in Latin American affairs, but it would also police the area and guarantee that Latin American nations met their international obligations.
What is Roosevelt Corollary?In 1904, President Theodore Roosevelt established the Roosevelt Corollary, a foreign policy stance for the United States. According to it, the U.S. would get involved in Latin American nations where European powers were trying to recoup debts or whose governments were deemed unstable.
The Roosevelt Corollary was a foreign policy statement made by U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt in 1904-05 that allowed the United States to interfere in the internal affairs of Latin American nations when they engaged in egregious and persistent wrongdoing.
To learn more about Roosevelt Corollary visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12069388
#SPJ4