Answer:
OA
Explanation:
I believe it's OA because Connecticut was part of the union, and didn't have a slave code,
Can I have brainliest? It would help me out, if not thanks anyways! Hope this helped and have a nice day :)
Select the correct answer.
The market demand for milk in Country X is 18 billion gallons per month, but the supply is 10 billion gallons per month. What must happen in order to achieve market equilibrium?
Group of answer choices
The monthly supply of milk must decrease by 28 billion gallons.
The monthly supply of milk must increase by 8 billion gallons.
The monthly supply of milk must increase by 28 billion gallons.
The monthly supply of milk must decrease by 8 billion gallons.
Answer: The monthly supply of milk must increase by 8 billion gallons.
Explanation: The existing market supply of milk is 10 billion gallons per month, but it needs to be 18 billion per month because this is how much is demanded (demand). This means you need to add 8 billion gallons per month [produced], because 10 + 8 = 18 billion gallons of milk per month.
How is organizing history by theme different from organizing by region?
Answer: Organizing history by theme groups events and ideas together based on their similarities, while organizing by region groups them based on their geographic location.
Explanation: For example, a theme-based approach might group together events related to the civil rights movement, while a region-based approach might group together events related to the American South. Therefore, organizing history is based on similarities and organizing region is based on their geographic location.
Compare and contrast the ideals of socialism and communism.
Please Help!! African History!!!
Answer:
The answer is C
Explanation:
Which of the following best describes a “tributary empire” such as the Aztec? *
Answer: Inca
Explanation: I know the Inca empire was very powerful like the Aztec so I looked up "was the Inca empire a tributary empire" and it said yes. Source- www.columbia.edu
Which idea did President Andrew Jackson support?
O enacting the Tariff of 1828
passing the South Carolina Act of Nullification
O opening the Second Bank of
the United States
O banning enslavement in the United States
Answer:
The Tariff of 1828 had driven Vice President Calhoun to pen his “South Carolina Exposition and Protest,” in which he argued that if a national majority acted against the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void—or nullify—federal law. By the early 1830s, the battle over the tariff took on new urgency as the price of cotton continued to fall. In 1818, cotton had been thirty-one cents per pound. By 1831, it had sunk to eight cents per pound. While production of cotton had soared during this time and this increase contributed to the decline in prices, many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank.
Resentment of the tariff was linked directly to the issue of slavery, because the tariff demonstrated the use of federal power. Some southerners feared the federal government would next take additional action against the South, including the abolition of slavery. The theory of nullification, or the voiding of unwelcome federal laws, provided wealthy slaveholders, who were a minority in the United States, with an argument for resisting the national government if it acted contrary to their interests. James Hamilton, who served as governor of South Carolina in the early 1830s, denounced the “despotic majority that oppresses us.” Nullification also raised the specter of secession; aggrieved states at the mercy of an aggressive majority would be forced to leave the Union.
On the issue of nullification, South Carolina stood alone. Other southern states backed away from what they saw as the extremism behind the idea. President Jackson did not make the repeal of the 1828 tariff a priority and denied the nullifiers’ arguments. He and others, including former President Madison, argued that Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution gave Congress the power to “lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises.” Jackson pledged to protect the Union against those who would try to tear it apart over the tariff issue. “The union shall be preserved,” he declared in 1830.
To deal with the crisis, Jackson advocated a reduction in tariff rates. The Tariff of 1832, passed in the summer, lowered the rates on imported goods, a move designed to calm southerners. It did not have the desired effect, however, and Calhoun’s nullifiers still claimed their right to override federal law. In November, South Carolina passed the Ordinance of Nullification, declaring the 1828 and 1832 tariffs null and void in the Palmetto State. Jackson responded, however, by declaring in the December 1832 Nullification Proclamation that a state did not have the power to void a federal law.
A portrait of Robert Hayne is shown.
The governor of South Carolina, Robert Hayne, elected in 1832, was a strong proponent of states’ rights and the theory of nullification.
With the states and the federal government at an impasse, civil war seemed a real possibility. The next governor of South Carolina, Robert Hayne, called for a force of ten thousand volunteers to defend the state against any federal action. At the same time, South Carolinians who opposed the nullifiers told Jackson that eight thousand men stood ready to defend the Union. Congress passed the Force Bill of 1833, which gave the federal government the right to use federal troops to ensure compliance with federal law. The crisis—or at least the prospect of armed conflict in South Carolina—was defused by the Compromise Tariff of 1833, which reduced tariff rates considerably. Nullifiers in South Carolina accepted it, but in a move that demonstrated their inflexibility, they nullified the Force Bill.
The Nullification Crisis illustrated the growing tensions in American democracy: an aggrieved minority of elite, wealthy slaveholders taking a stand against the will of a democratic majority; an emerging sectional divide between South and North over slavery; and a clash between those who believed in free trade and those who believed in protective tariffs to encourage the nation’s economic growth. These tensions would color the next three decades of politics in the United States.
Explanation:
Answer:
Enacting the Tariff of 1828
Explanation:
Since the person above me wasn't helpful at all with their answer, let me give you a REAL answer.
I attached a photo down for proof.
Good luck on your test! :)
Is the United States of America an empire? If so, where is the empire, and how has it changed since 1900? If not, was it ever? If it was but no longer is an empire, when did it end, and what led to its demise? please give historical evidence.
Officially, the U.S. is not an empire but has been imperialistic in the past. It however is no longer officially an empire and this ended after WWII.
When was the U.S. an empire?An empire is a nation that has territories that it rules over and the United States was once this way with territories such as the Philippines, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico.
It no longer is an empire however because Puerto Rico and Hawaii have representation in government and so are not ruled. Philippines is now independent.
The demise of the official empire of the U.S. came as a result of the U.S. having to preserve its status as a nation of free people who don't rule over others.
Find out more on American imperialism at https://brainly.com/question/715589.
#SPJ1
According to Thomas Hobbes's concept of the social contract, what do people exchange for protection by the government?
• A. Hobbes believed people exchange voting rights for government protection.
• B. Hobbes didn't believe in government protection.
• c. Hobbes believed people exchange money for government protection.
• D. Hobbes believed people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
Answer:
D. Hobbes believed people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
who objected to the brutal treatment of native americans
Bartolomé de Las Casas was the one that objected to the brutal treatment of native Americans.
How were the native Americans treated brutally?The natives were treated brutally in the ways that they were made to leave the lands that they owned as heritage. The people that came to the lands took their resources and also engaged them in several battles where a lot of them died.
Also the people had to receive harsh treatments from the diseases and the illnesses that the explorers brought into their lands leading to the death of a lot of them.
Read more on native Americans here: https://brainly.com/question/24715290
#SPJ1
Rivers and mountains are examples of __________ boundaries.
Answer:
Natural
Explanation:
You didn't give multiple choice but that would make the most sense.
In the Pequot War, the colonists allied with the
Answer: The Narragansett people and the
Mohegan tribe
Explanation:
Generate Explanations Like many issues in United States history, the
Red Scare was reflected in various genres of art, including books and
films. Why do you think this is so?
A Red Scare is when a society or state actively promotes a generalized fear of the possible growth of communism, anarchist, or other leftist ideologies.
What was the Red Scare an example of?Many Americans feared recent immigrants and dissidents during the Red Scare of 1919–1920, especially those who adhered to communist, socialist, or anarchist doctrine.
The Red Scare, according to Levin, was "a countrywide anti-radical frenzy sparked by an increasing dread and anxiety that an American Bolshevik revolution was about to happen—a revolution that would transform Church, home, marriage, civility, and the American way of Life." Such worries were amplified by news media.
A Red Scare is when a society or state actively promotes a generalized fear of the possible growth of communism, anarchist, or other leftist ideologies.
To learn more about Red Scare visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21462636
#SPJ1
Which statement about actions taken by Hoover to combat the Great Depression is false? He encouraged the passing of the Revenue Act, which increased taxes. He created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, which lent money directly to banks. He supported the Relief and Reconstruction Act, which created jobs through public works projects. He championed the Family Assistance Act, which provided direct monetary aid to families.
Answer:
He encouraged the passing of the Revenue Act, which increased taxes.
Explanation:
During the Great Depression period which started around 1929, in the United States, the then-President Herbert Hoover, in his attempt to guide the country out of the recession, made series of attempts to ensure the country maintains good economic standing.
However, considering the available options, the thing he did not do is that " He encouraged the passing of the Revenue Act, which increased taxes."
This is evident in the fact immediately after the Great Depression started, he asked Congress for a $160 million tax cut while he also increases spending for construction and infrastructures.
Answer:
He championed the Family Assistance Act, which provided direct monetary aid to families.
Explanation:
Which statement best completes the timeline about the history of Brazil?
Brazil declares
independence
from Portugal.
Portuguese
royalty holds
power.
Military leaders
set up a
republic.
A. Rebellions split Brazil into two countries.
B. Brazil sets up an empire in South America.
C. Brazil becomes a military dictatorship.
D. Brazil is colonized by European powers
?
Citizens gain
the right to
vote.
Brazil becomes a military dictatorship best completes the timeline about the history of Brazil. Hence, option (c) will be the relevant answer.
Give a brief account on history of Brazil.Brazil had tribes from the Stone Age, long before the advent of the Europeans. Following the advent of the Portuguese, Pedro Alvares Cabral declared Brazil to be a Portuguese colony in 1500. Portugal started annexing more land after the first colony was established in 1532.
Brazil shares a lengthy, indigenous history with many other South American nations that goes back more than 10,000 years. The indigenous "Indians," who generally resided in tribes along the shore and rivers, were Brazil's initial inhabitants.
The colonial era began in 1500 when the Portuguese, led by the brave Pedro Cabral, landed in the region. According to legend, there were around seven million native Indians.
To know more about, Brazil, visit :
brainly.com/question/19569001
#SPJ1
1. What were the underlying causes of the Great War? What was the immediate cause?
Answer:
Explanation:
The immediate cause of World War I that made the aforementioned items come into play (alliances, imperialism, militarism, nationalism) was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. In June 1914, a Serbian-nationalist terrorist group called the Black Hand sent groups to assassinate the Archduke.
please help fast
who led a series of wish hunts to find the prosecute commits to the United States government do it vulture Douglas MacArthur Joseph McCarthy John Marshall
The person who led a series of witch hunts to find and prosecute Communists in the United States government is Joseph McCarthy.
McCarthyism is a term that refers to the practice of making unfounded accusations and using intimidation tactics to silence political opponents.
McCarthyism is the act of making unfounded accusations and using intimidation tactics to silence political opponents.
The term is derived from the name of Senator Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin, who led a campaign to expose alleged communists and communist sympathizers in the United States government and other organizations in the 1950s. During the period of McCarthyism, many people were accused of being communist sympathizers without evidence or proof. They were often blacklisted from their jobs and faced persecution.
The actions of McCarthy and his supporters contributed to a climate of fear and paranoia in the United States, known as the "Red Scare."Many people's lives were ruined by accusations of being communists, although most had done nothing wrong. The use of intimidation tactics by McCarthy and his followers caused a great deal of damage to the American political system and the reputation of the United States.
For more such answers on Joseph McCarthy
https://brainly.com/question/28901578
#SPJ8
In at least 100 words, describe how Thomas Paine uses personification as a rhetorical technique in the American crisis. Use evidence from the text to support your answer.
Answer:
Thomas Paine personifies America as a woman, by referring to the nation as "her, she" etc.
Explanation:
Personification is the giving of human or living attributes to non-living things or abstract ideas. In other words, when non-human things are given human characteristics, it is not as personification.
Thomas Paine uses numerous rhetorical devices in his "American Crisis", one of which is personification. He personifies America as a woman, a lady in his statement "America did not, nor does not want force; but she wanted a proper application of that force." (The Crisis I)
He again uses this same personification in chapter II, "Perhaps you thought America too was taking a nap, and therefore chose, like Satan to Eve, to whisper the delusion softly, lest you should awaken her."
Such personifications help imagine the country as a person, and easy to relate to the issues troubling the great nation.
Answer:
In Thomas Paine's pamphlet titled The American Crisis, he makes use of many types of figurative language, but in particular, he uses personification as a rhetorical technique. First and foremost, Thomas Paine personifies America as a whole by referring to the nation with the pronouns "she" and "her," suggesting that America is feminine or a woman. This is done intentionally on the part of Thomas Paine so that he may further his message that America is one nation; therefore, the people of the nation should stand and fight together for one single cause. By suggesting that America is a woman, or rather, one single person, Paine's audience will recognize that America is not just each colony divided; it is one nation under liberty.
Explanation:
Please answer in your own words :)
The constitutional principle of _________ means that the power to govern the country lies within the hands of its citizens.
a. separation of powers
b. federalism
c. limited government
d. popular sovereignty
Answer: D, Popular Sovereignty
Explanation:
Nationalism is the belief that a person's Nation deserves greater loyalty than other groups a person belongs to.
True or False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
because nationalism is the belief that a nation Is better than another one
allowed British customs inspectors to search colonial ships.
a package arrives at your house, but you didn't order anything. Write about what happens next.
Answer:
Explanation:
you look for the correct address and bring the package to that house
Answer: Do not open the package
Explanation:
I wouldn't open the package, whatever is in there is not my business. The next day or when avalible I would go to the post office, explain what happened, and let them take care of it.
(Hint : I'm still alive without millions of dollars from a random package)
Which of the following factors helped lead to a period of industrial growth during the late 1800s?
the increase in the cost of hiring labor
the decline in the population of urban areas
the decline in government spending for business and innovation
the increase in the development of new uses for natural resources
Answer:
Option: The increase in the development of new uses for natural resources.
Explanation:
Factors that encouraged industrial growth in the late 1800s are plentiful of natural resources like coal, iron, and limber.
Iron ore utilised to produce steel for constructing industries in large scale, railroad, and buildings.
Before coal, lumber used to fuel the steam engines in industries for the machines, trains, and steamboats that worked on steam.
Coal served in industries and factories through the steam engine and machinery. Coal replaced wood in generating power.
Learn more about:
https://brainly.com/question/17908579
help please im in k12
Answer:
B. The sea floor is spreading.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. The seafloor is spreading.
Explanation:
That's where the seafloor spreads.
Hope it helped
Based on The Federalist 21, which of the following arguments about government would Hamilton likely agree with?
The national government, by natural right, has more power than the state governments.
6
Separation of powers means that the national government is limited to passing only legislation that all the states want
Under federalism, the states retain more power than the national government
0
As a practical matter, the laws of the national government ought to have supremacy over state laws.
Answer:
Respect
Explanation:
Respect is more important for the government
Arguments about government would Hamilton likely agree with As a practical matter, the laws of the national government ought to have supremacy over state laws Option(d) is correct.
What does Federalism means?Federalism is an arrangement of government wherein a similar region is constrained by two degrees of government. For the most part, a general public government is liable.
Federalism was brought into the world in 1787, when Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison composed 85 expositions by and large known as the Federalist papers. These smooth political reports urged Americans to embrace the recently composed Constitution and its more grounded focal government.
Present day federalism is a political framework in light of popularity based rules and foundations in which the ability to oversee is divided among public and commonplace/state legislatures. The term federalist portrays a few political convictions all over the planet relying upon setting. Since the term federalization additionally depicts unmistakable political cycles, its utilization too relies upon the specific situation.
Therefore Option(d) is correct.
Learn more about Federalism here:
brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ2
Which type of claim does an argument of consequences make?
An argument of consequences typically makes a causal claim, highlighting the potential outcomes of a specific course of action.
An argument of consequences typically makes a causal claim. This type of claim asserts a cause-and-effect relationship between certain actions, events, or circumstances and their resulting outcomes or consequences.In an argument of consequences, the focus is on the potential positive or negative effects that may arise from a particular course of action or decision. The argument attempts to persuade by highlighting the favorable or unfavorable consequences that are likely to occur if the proposed action is taken or not taken.The strength of an argument of consequences lies in its ability to appeal to the self-interest, values, or concerns of the audience. By emphasizing the potential outcomes, it aims to convince the listener or reader that the suggested action is beneficial or detrimental based on the predicted consequences.It is important to note that an argument of consequences does not necessarily prove the truth or validity of the claim itself. Instead, it relies on the persuasive power of the anticipated outcomes to sway the audience's opinion or behavior.In conclusion, an argument of consequences revolves around asserting a causal relationship between actions and their outcomes to support a specific standpoint or viewpoint.For more questions on argument
https://brainly.com/question/3775579
#SPJ8
how did the haptin panic change America? what was so important about this event?
Answer:
Explanation:
The "Halloween Panic" or "War of the Worlds Panic," often referred to as the Orson Welles Panic, was a significant event in American history that took place on October 30, 1938. The event was a radio broadcast adaptation of H.G. Wells' science fiction novel "The War of the Worlds," which described a Martian invasion of Earth. The broadcast was so realistic that it caused widespread panic and hysteria among listeners who believed it was an actual news broadcast.
The impact of the panic was significant, as it showed how powerful the media can be in shaping public opinion and emotions. The incident led to a renewed focus on the regulation of radio broadcasting and censorship. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was established in 1934, but the "Halloween Panic" highlighted the need for tighter controls on the content of radio broadcasts.
The incident also highlighted the power of propaganda and the need for responsible media practices. The broadcast created a sense of fear and panic among the public, which showed how vulnerable people can be to sensational and false information.
Furthermore, the "Halloween Panic" demonstrated the impact of the media on mass psychology, and it became a case study for understanding the psychology of mass hysteria. The event was studied by psychologists and sociologists to understand how people react to frightening and uncertain situations.
In conclusion, the "Halloween Panic" was an event that changed America by bringing to light the power of the media and the need for responsible media practices. The incident highlighted the importance of regulation and censorship in radio broadcasting, the impact of propaganda on public opinion and mass psychology, and the vulnerability of people to sensational and false information. The event remains an important case study in understanding the psychology of mass hysteria and the impact of the media on society.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
According to the United States Constitution, what are the powers and responsibilities of the legislative branch?
Would the United States have been better off in the long run if Monroe had joined hands with
Britain to keep the other European powers out of the America's?
Answer:
no. it wouldnt have
what is centralisation
Answer:
read below
Explanation:
the control of an activity, or of control from one authority
The Supreme Courts' decision led to
a. accelerating westward migration.
b. increasing conflict with American Indian nations.
c. deepening divisions between the North and South.
d. strengthening the Second Party System
Answer: c. deepening divisions between the North and South.
Explanation:
You included no references but I believe the answer above is correct if it relates to the Dred-Scott case.
The Dred Scott case happened when an enslaved Dred Scott sued for his freedom as he lived in a free state. The Supreme Court ruled that he could not even sue as he was regarded as property. It went forward to state that African Americans could not be American citizens because they were property.
This is widely regarded as one of the worst decisions in Supreme Court history and it deepened the division between the North and the South in a period where the North was increasingly advocating for Abolitionism and the South were stubbornly holding onto slavery.