If a criminal defendant enters a plea of no lo contendere, what have they done?
O a. pled not guilty by reason of insanity
O b. pled guilty
O c. chosen not to contest the charges against them
O d. pled not guilty

The elements that do not represent corpus delicti are:

This refers to the legal term that has to do with the facts and circumstances that make up a crime.

Hence, we can see that The elements that do not represent corpus delicti are:

This is because causation and concurrence are not valid proof that a crime was committed and guilt being established and thus is not a representation of corpus delicti.

In criminal law, the facts and circumstances are determined by several factors...

Read more about corpus delicti here:

https://brainly.com/question/17636247

#SPJ1

Answer:

Deviance is behavior that violates social norms and arouses negative social reactions. Crime is behavior that is considered so serious that it violates formal laws prohibiting such behavior. Social control refers to ways in which a society tries to prevent and sanction behavior that violates norms.

Explanation:

hope that helps

According to the doctrine of the toxic trees, evidence generated from illegally obtained evidence is not admissible in court, thus expanding the exclusionary rule.

As the core of teachings in a particular field of study or belief system, doctrine is a codification of beliefs or a body of teachings or instructions, taught concepts or positions.

"Catechism" is the etymologically equivalent Greek word. A body of theological doctrines as established by a church is frequently expressly suggested by the word doctrine.

In the common-law traditions, doctrine can also refer to a legal theory that has been formed through a lineage of earlier judgements. According to sociologist Mervin Verbit, one of the essential elements of religion is doctrine.

Content, frequency, intensity, and centrality are the four categories he uses to categorize doctrine. Within a given religious tradition, each of these may differ from one religion to the next.

Learn more about doctrine, here

https://brainly.com/question/30613074

#SPJ1

Answer:

adventuring duh hey you sup

Answer:b

Explanation:

The example of an implied contract is option a. In this scenario, Alberto visits his physician for medical treatment, and although they do not explicitly discuss payment, Alberto receives a bill from his physician for the services rendered.

This situation demonstrates an implied contract where the parties involved understood that payment would be expected for the services provided, even though it was not explicitly discussed.

An implied contract is formed based on the conduct and actions of the parties involved rather than through explicit written or verbal agreements. It arises when there is an understanding or expectation between the parties that they will enter into a contractual relationship and fulfill certain obligations.

Option b is an example of an express contract where Midori offers to sell a necklace to Patricia, and Patricia agrees to pay $50 for the necklace. The terms and conditions of the agreement are explicitly stated, and both parties have communicated their acceptance.

Option c illustrates a unilateral contract, where Amy offers a reward (batch of brownies) to her neighbor Tom if he rakes up her leaves. Tom accepts the offer by performing the requested task, creating a binding contract.

Option d represents a typical scenario of a formal, written contract for the purchase of a home. Miguel signed a contract and completed the necessary steps for closing the deal, which involves a clear expression of intent and agreement between the parties.

Therefore, the example that best demonstrates an implied contract is option a, where Alberto receives a bill from his physician for the medical services rendered, even though payment was not explicitly discussed during the visit.

Learn more about scenario here

https://brainly.com/question/30275614

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. C

2. B

3. D

4. A

5. C

6. C

7. B

8. C

9. A

10. D

Explanation:

If Ramish had died intestate, meaning without a valid will, his estate would have been distributed according to the laws of intestacy in his state of residence.

Residence refers to the place where an individual lives or has their permanent dwelling. It is the location that serves as their primary or habitual place of residence, where they reside and carry out their daily activities. Residence can refer to different types of living arrangements, including houses, apartments, condos, or other forms of housing.
Residence is more than just a physical space; it also carries legal and social implications. It often determines an individual's rights, responsibilities, and privileges within a specific jurisdiction. Legal definitions of residence may vary depending on the context and jurisdiction, and they can have implications for taxation, voting, access to services, and eligibility for certain benefits.
The order of inheritance would typically start with the closest living relatives, such as his spouse, children, or parents. In this case, since Ramish was survived by his mother, son-in-law, and granddaughter, they would have been the first in line to inherit his estate, in that order.

To learn more about residence
https://brainly.com/question/29672580
#SPJ11

Answer:  City managers usually have special training in areas such as managing money and city planning. A person elected mayor could be 18 years old with no experience whatsoever.

Explanation:

States are still debating the best way to implement "Megan's Law."

States must implement the registration and notification requirements for sex offenders under this federal law, which was passed in 1996. States are required to make public any pertinent details about registered sex offenders in order to uphold and safeguard public safety.

LEARN MORE ABOUT "Megan's Law." HERE :

https://brainly.com/question/15027727

#SPJ4

In appellate courts, the attorneys merely present the judge or a panel of judges with legal and policy arguments. In the trial courts, the attorneys make evidence and legal arguments in an effort to persuade the judge or jury in a bench trial. 

Usually, one judge preside over a trial. In contrast, multi-judge panels typically consider appeals. A multi-judge panel will review the appeal and make a decision, as opposed to a single judge or a jury making the decision in a trial.

Understanding the varied responsibilities that trial and appellate courts play in our legal system is essential. While appellate courts resolve issues that apply to all cases, trial courts typically make decisions that are case-specific.

To learn more about Trial Court visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1384353

#SPJ4

The future of Justice in the United States will be about the promotion of justice in pre trial services and practices.

It should be noted that justice simply means the prices of using laws to fairly judge people.

In this case, the future of Justice in the United States will be about the promotion of justice in pre trial services and practices. Also, there'll be enhancement of prosecutional integrity.

Learn more about justice on:

https://brainly.com/question/25756666

Answer:

A collision occurs every 6 seconds.

A collision occurs every 6 seconds

Answer:

It prevents a defendant from doing something that the defendant has threatened to doExplanation:

Answer:

The father of the Uhuru Kenyatta was Jomo Kenyatta.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:

Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.

Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.

Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.

Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.

Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.

Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.

Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.

Answer:

To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.

Explanation:

1. Country A is experiencing a recessionary output gap.

2. The increase in unemployment is an example of cyclical unemployment.

3. Ms. X would suggest that Country A's central bank undertake expansionary open market operations, buying government securities to increase the money supply and lower interest rates.

4. The answer of each point is:

Country A is experiencing a recessionary output gap because its current national income ($610) is below the full-employment level ($840), indicating a significant shortfall in output and economic activity. The increase in unemployment represents cyclical unemployment, which occurs due to the economic downturn or recession, as Country A's high unemployment rate of 9% reflects the negative impact of the recession on job opportunities.

To address the output gap, Ms. X suggests expansionary open market operations, where Country A's central bank buys government securities to inject money into the economy, lowering interest rates. This policy aims to stimulate consumption, investment, and overall economic activity, potentially leading to higher output, lower unemployment, and increased inflation.

The multiplier is 5, which means that for every dollar increase in government spending, the overall national income will increase by five dollars due to the multiplier effect. To close the output gap, government spending (G) needs to increase by $46, calculated by dividing the output gap ($230) by the marginal propensity to consume (MPC), which is 0.2 (derived from the consumption function: $3 increase in consumption for a $15 increase in income).

The tax multiplier is -2, implying that for every dollar decrease in taxes, the overall national income will decrease by two dollars due to reduced consumption and aggregate demand. If government spending (G) remains unchanged, government transfer payments need to increase by $23 to close the output gap. This is calculated by dividing the output gap ($230) by the tax multiplier (-2). Increasing transfer payments will boost disposable income, consumption, and aggregate demand, compensating for the output gap.

Learn more about national income: https://brainly.com/question/30462883

#SPJ11

A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone.

A security officer is a professional who is trained to secure and protect individuals and property. Security personnel may be found in a variety of settings, including corporate offices, malls, hospitals, and other locations. These professionals are tasked with ensuring the safety of individuals and property under their supervision.

Provocation is a situation in which an individual engages in actions or makes statements that are intended to provoke or incite another person. This may include insults, threats, and other forms of verbal or physical aggression.

A reaction to a stimulus is referred to as a response. This may include a variety of physiological, emotional, and cognitive changes. In terms of behavior, a response is the way in which an individual responds to a particular situation. The response to verbal provocation by a security officer may differ based on the situation and the level of provocation.

A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone. This is due to the fact that the use of force is only allowed when it is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to oneself or others. When verbal provocation occurs, a security officer should attempt to defuse the situation verbally before resorting to the use of force.

Furthermore, if a security officer uses force in response to verbal provocation, they may face legal consequences, including charges of assault or battery. As a result, it is recommended that security personnel receive training on conflict resolution and effective communication to deal with potentially difficult situations.

You can learn more about security officers at: https://brainly.com/question/28326176

#SPJ11

Answer:

PSD

Explanation:

The correct answer is C. Sworn police officers who work in patrol and as detectives make up the majority of local law enforcement employees.

Explanation

A local police department is a police force that covers a territory to protect a population. A police department is made up of police officers who patrol around the city, there are also detectives tasked with investigating cases that require an investigation, and other forces to maintain public order in a city. According to the above, the correct answer is C. Sworn police officers who work in patrol and as detectives make up the majority of local law enforcement employees.

A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.

A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.

These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.

You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517

#SPJ11

Hi,

All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it is the only part of the government that can make new laws or changes existing laws. Executive Branch agencies issue regulations with the full force of law, but these are only under the authority of laws enacted by Congress.

Hope this helps! :)