Identify the risks these women are taking by demonstrating in this parade.

An astronaut moving within a space shuttle requires microgravity accommodations and safety measures. They need handrails, footholds, and tethering systems for easy mobility and security.

In microgravity, astronauts do not experience the same pull of gravity as on Earth, making movement challenging. To accommodate this, the space shuttle is equipped with handrails and footholds, allowing astronauts to grip and secure themselves as they navigate. These rails and holds are strategically placed throughout the shuttle, helping them to maintain control over their movements.

Additionally, tethering systems are essential to prevent astronauts from drifting away or losing control. These systems include retractable tethers and Velcro straps that secure tools and equipment, ensuring that they remain attached to the astronaut or the shuttle during tasks.

Furthermore, astronauts are trained in the neutral body posture (NBP), a position that allows them to maintain balance and control in microgravity. They must also wear suitable clothing, like the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) for spacewalks, which provides mobility, protection, and life support.

In summary, to move within a space shuttle, astronauts rely on handrails, footholds, tethering systems, neutral body posture, and appropriate attire to safely navigate and perform tasks in the challenging microgravity environment.

Know more about the astronauts click here:

https://brainly.com/question/20261060

#SPJ11

The word "enemy" creates a tense mood.

The political, security, economic, cultural, and other interests of a nation are all included in the concept of national interests, which is crucial to understanding international relations.

The Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986's Section 603 mandates the publication of the National Security Strategy (NSS), a report (Public Law 99-433). Since 1987, the NSS has been distributed yearly, but frequently, reports are received late or not at all.

To convey the executive branch's vision for national security to the legislative branch, the President must send the NSS to Congress. The NSS discusses potential applications for all facets of American power that are required to meet the country's security objectives.

A discussion of American international interests, commitments, goals, and policies is required in the report, along with information on the defense capabilities required to thwart threats and carry out American security plans.

Learn more about the National Security Strategy with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/8601999

#SPJ9

The experience of internment for Japanese Americans during World War II was a deeply traumatic and unjust episode in American history.

Following the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, the U.S. government implemented policies that forcibly relocated and incarcerated over 120,000 individuals of Japanese descent, the majority of whom were American citizens.

Internment camps were established across the country, where Japanese Americans were forced to live in crowded and deplorable conditions. Families were often separated and forced to live in barracks-style housing with minimal privacy. They faced harsh living conditions, with inadequate sanitation facilities and limited access to healthcare.

The internment experience had significant economic and emotional impacts on Japanese Americans. Many lost their homes, businesses, and personal belongings. Their civil liberties were violated, as they were subjected to constant surveillance and discrimination.

Despite these challenges, Japanese Americans demonstrated resilience and strength during their internment. They formed communities within the camps, organized schools, and even produced artwork and newspapers. Some Japanese Americans enlisted in the military to demonstrate their loyalty to the United States.

It is crucial to remember that internment was based on racial prejudice and not on any evidence of disloyalty or wrongdoing. In 1988, the U.S. government officially apologized for this grave injustice and provided reparations to surviving Japanese American internees.

In conclusion, the internment experience for Japanese Americans during World War II was marked by the violation of their civil liberties, harsh living conditions, and the loss of homes and businesses. It is a dark chapter in American history that serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their background.

know more about Internment camps here;

https://brainly.com/question/30336168

#SPJ11

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, often known as the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact, was a 1939 agreement between Germany and the Soviet Union.

The agreement featured a covert protocol wherein the Soviet Union and Germany agreed to dominate the nations east of a line passing through Poland, while the Soviet Union would rule the nations west of that line.

By signing the Nonaggression Pact, the Soviet Union promised to refrain from interfering with Germany's ambitions to invade and conquer sections of Poland and to maintain its neutrality in the event that Germany started a conflict with other nations in Western Europe.

Germany was able to concentrate its military efforts on the west and easily invade and take over France and the Low Countries in 1940 as a result.

To learn more about German-Soviet Nonaggression

https://brainly.com/question/9347066

#SPJ4

The Progressive Era saw the expansion of C. individual rights for more Americans, particularly with the introduction of new social welfare programs, the extension of voting rights to women, and the expansion of civil liberties.

This was in part due to the increased power of the executive branch, which was seen as a tool to bring about much-needed reforms. Other changes included the introduction of child labor laws, minimum wages, and Social Security. These reforms sought to expand the rights of Americans and to provide greater economic security and opportunity.

Learn more about Progressive Era at: https://brainly.com/question/1994197

#SPJ4

The party leader speaks for the party and helps facilitate agreement among its members.

For more such questions on Party leader:

https://brainly.com/question/28342969

#SPJ8

Answer:

Floor Leaders

Explanation:

Answer:

okokokokokokoo

ExplanationIn philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.

It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.

Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?

Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.

The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.

This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.

Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.

If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?

This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.

Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.

A world where there is nothing is just an empty shell, you might reply; but the shell itself exists, is something. And even if there were no matter, arguably space could still exist, so could time; and these are not nothing.

Beautiful art should provide pleasure to the viewer philosophy best describes the attitude towards beauty in art during the 18th century.

Philosophy is the systematic study of general and fundamental questions such as existence, reason, knowledge, values, mind, and language. Such questions are often asked as problems to be investigated or solved. Some sources claim that the term was coined by Pythagoras, while others dispute the story, claiming that the Pythagoreans simply insisted on using an existing term. Philosophical methods include questioning, critical argument, rational reasoning, and systematic explanation.

Historically, philosophy encompassed all areas of knowledge, and practitioners were known as philosophers. From the time of the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle to the 19th century, "natural philosophy" included astronomy, medicine, and physics. For example, Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy in 1687 was later classified as a book of physics.

In the 19th century, the growth of modern research universities led to the specialization and specialization of academic philosophy and other fields. Since then, various fields of study traditionally part of philosophy have become Social sciences such as psychology, sociology, linguistics, and economics have become disciplines of their own.

Learn more about Philosophy  here: https://brainly.com/question/16999698

#SPJ4

Answer:

impressive

Explanation:

because it is.

Answer: Modest

Explanation:

Answer:

In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school's use of "affirmative action" to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.

Explanation:

The proposal for popular sovereignty called for deciding the issue of slavery in the territories through a vote or referendum.

This means that the people living in the territories would have the power to decide whether or not to allow slavery in their region.

Popular sovereignty was an idea that emerged during the mid-19th century in the United States. It was a belief that the people should have the ultimate authority to determine the laws and policies that govern them.

In the context of the issue of slavery, popular sovereignty was seen as a compromise between the North and South. It allowed for the possibility of new territories to decide whether or not to permit slavery based on the will of the majority of its residents.

This idea was particularly important during the time when the United States was expanding westward. As new territories were being acquired, the question of whether slavery would be allowed in these areas became a contentious issue. The proposal for popular sovereignty aimed to give the power of decision-making to the people living in these territories.

For example, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 implemented popular sovereignty in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. This act repealed the Missouri Compromise and allowed the residents of these territories to vote on whether or not to allow slavery. This led to a significant amount of conflict and violence between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the region.

Overall, the proposal for popular sovereignty sought to address the issue of slavery by giving the power of decision-making to the people living in the territories. This allowed for a more democratic approach to determining the future of slavery in these areas, but it also led to significant tensions and conflicts.

Learn more about referendum from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/31168258

#SPJ11

Shomei Tomatsu Senji Yamaguchi of Urakami, is a photograph about the victims of the bombing of Nagasaki, Japan at the end of WWII is False.

The Second Great War or WWII, frequently contracted as WWII or WW2, was a worldwide clash that endured from 1939 to 1945. The vast majority of nations, including all of the world's major powers, engaged in combat as members of two opposing military alliances: the Partners and the Pivot.

This total war was fueled by the economic, industrial, and scientific capabilities of many participants, blurring the line between military and civilian resources. The delivery of the only two nuclear weapons ever used in a war and the strategic bombing of population centers were both made possible thanks to aircraft.

The Second Great War was by a long shot the deadliest struggle ever, coming about in an expected 70 to 85 million fatalities, generally among regular citizens. Genocide, including the Holocaust, starvation, massacres, and disease claimed the lives of tens of millions of people. Right after the Pivot rout, Germany and Japan were involved, and atrocities courts were led against German and Japanese pioneers.

Learn more about WWII :

https://brainly.com/question/27898431

#SPJ4

Answer:

Americans had many reasons to be afraid of communism. Communism was the antithesis of capitalism, as communism involved a worker’s revolution in order to seize the means of production which is very different from the private ownership of property in a capitalist system. Americans were afraid of communism because if communist ideals reached America with enough force, a socialist president could be voted into office and direct America towards a more socialist way of life. Because the USSR tested an atomic bomb in 1949, Americans realized that the USSR was more advanced than they thought and the USSR really had the potential to ideologically take over America. As a result, I believe that American fears of communism were justified.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

direct election of US Senators

Explanation:

Answer:

America's entry into WWI

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps :)

Answer:

Japanese, Korean, and South Asian immigrants also arrived in the continental United States starting from the late 1800s and onwards to fill demands for labor.

Explanation:

Answer:

Treaty of Tordesillas

Explanation: hope this helps.

Answer: Aristotle used an empirical or methodological approach to solving a scientific problem.

Explanation:

It is a method that is still relevant in modern science today. This type of research was present in ancient times. It has indeed evolved, but the essence of problem-solving has remained the same. The empirical or methodological approach to problem-solving has several stages. Some of these phases define the problem, set goals, collect valid data, and all of them are very important to reach an objective scientific position.

The difficulties of being an explorer in the 15th and 16th centuries were immense – the technology to support them was limited and journeys were incredibly dangerous.

Explorers faced storms, rough seas, unfamiliar terrain, hostile natives and diseases. Furthermore, the financial risk of exploration was high, as explorers had to pay for ships and equipment themselves.

However, there were also great rewards. Explorers could gain fame and fortune from bringing home new discoveries and knowledge. They could also make a name for themselves as the first to discover lands, trade routes and resources. Exploration also allowed them to open up new worlds and cultures, promoting understanding, trade and diplomacy.

To know more about explorer, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17800920

#SPJ4

Settlement increased in the west

In the west hope it helps

Answer:

Because of the many invasions, it is more appropriate to refer to the Middle Ages as the "Dark Ages." The period under consideration saw a number of invasions. The Vikings were a well-known group of invaders that came from Scandinavia. Then, after robbing villages and bringing their treasure home, they would return to their homeland. They killed and set fire to innocent peasants and townspeople, causing widespread devastation. As a consequence of these assaults, many people were left homeless and starving. Those who were lucky perished in battle. It was also common for Vikings to abduct and transport innocent people to their homelands, where they would be forced to work as slaves. Another reason why the Middle Ages should be referred to as the Dark Ages was war.

Explanation:

Sad times!!!

(130 words)

The United States Government was formed as a republic, rather than as a direct democracy because democracy is "a type of governance in which all laws are decided directly by the people but in republic a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch

The United States is not a "direct democracy," or a nation where legislation are primarily passed by popular vote. On the state and local levels, some laws are passed in this manner, although it only makes up a very small portion of all laws. Our form of democracy, however, is a representative democracy.

Leading American statesmen and legal observers have referred to the American system of governance as a "democracy" since the Framing.

However, there is no evidence to support the claim that the United States is "not a democracy, but a republic." A speaker cannot simply interpret the terms "democracy" and "republic" to mean whatever they like (e.g., democracy is "a type of governance in which all laws are decided directly by the people").

These are words that have been given meaning by a larger group of English speakers. Furthermore, "democracy" has traditionally been believed to encompass both direct and representative democracy, both now and throughout the Framing era.

Learn more about democracy here:

https://brainly.com/question/13158670

#SPJ4

Sal Castro was a distinguished teacher, mentor, advocate, and community organizer, remembered for his role in the 1968 East Los Angeles Blowouts

Answer:

The goal of the offensive was to severely damage the United States and South Vietnamese forces as well as encourage an uprising against the government of South Vietnam.

Explanation:

Cahokia and Teotihuacán are two ancient civilizations that have left behind fascinating archaeological sites, yet they still hold many mysteries and unanswered questions. Here are some of the mysteries surrounding Cahokia and Teotihuacán:

1. Cahokia:

Cahokia, located near present-day St. Louis, Missouri, was once the largest city in North America during the Mississippian culture (900-1500 CE). Despite its prominence, there are still enigmatic aspects of Cahokia's civilization. One mystery revolves around the purpose and function of the massive earthen mounds found at the site. These mounds, such as Monk's Mound, were monumental structures that served various purposes, including ceremonial, residential, and administrative. However, the exact rituals and activities conducted on these mounds remain uncertain.

Another mystery is the decline and abandonment of Cahokia. By the 14th century, the city's population dwindled, and it was eventually abandoned. The reasons behind this decline are still debated among scholars. Possible factors include environmental changes, political instability, social conflicts, or the spread of diseases. Unraveling the specific causes of Cahokia's decline would shed light on the factors that shaped the fate of this once-thriving civilization.

2. Teotihuacán:

Teotihuacán, located near modern-day Mexico City, was one of the largest and most influential cities in ancient Mesoamerica. Its monumental architecture, including the Pyramid of the Sun and the Pyramid of the Moon, reflects the city's grandeur. However, much about Teotihuacán remains a mystery. One enigma is the identity of its rulers and the nature of its political organization. Despite extensive archaeological research, no clear evidence of kings or a centralized ruling system has been found.

Another mystery is the purpose and symbolism behind the elaborate murals and iconography found throughout the city. The meanings behind the intricate frescoes and carvings are still not fully understood, leaving room for interpretation and speculation.

Additionally, the collapse of Teotihuacán is another unresolved mystery. Around the 7th century CE, the city experienced a decline and eventual abandonment. The causes of this collapse, such as social unrest, environmental factors, or external invasions, are still subjects of ongoing research and debate.

Studying and uncovering the mysteries of Cahokia and Teotihuacán is an ongoing endeavor that involves archaeological investigations, interdisciplinary research, and the analysis of cultural and historical contexts. By piecing together the fragments of these ancient civilizations, we can gain a deeper understanding of their complexities and the factors that shaped their rise and fall

for more questions on .archaeological

https://brainly.com/question/928273

#SPJ8

African Americans engaged in the civil rights movement, which primarily occurred in the 1950s and 1960s, in an effort to obtain justice and equality for themselves.

What being engaged means?

African Americans engaged in the civil rights movement, which primarily occurred in the 1950s and 1960s, in an effort to obtain justice and equality for themselves.

Debbie and Christa have just announced their formal engagement and upcoming nuptials. This guy in the army was her fiancé. formal To get married in June, they are engaged. added instances

A pair is referred to as being engaged, betrothed, intended, affianced, or fiancés (from the French) during this time. Future husbands and wives can refer to each other as fiancée (feminine) or fiancé (masculine), the betrothed, a wife-to-be, or a husband-to-be, respectively.

Know more about  primarily Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11136385

#SPJ1

Answer:

me

Explanation:

me:)

Answer:

The new morality of the 1920s can be defined as liberalism. It was the idea that all individuals are entitled to freedom and equality. The new morality of the 1920s affected gender, race, and sexuality during the 1920s. ... Concerning gender, the 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote.  

The main difference between conservatorship and guardianship is the scope of authority granted to the responsible person. Conservatorship is a legal arrangement where a court appoints a conservator to manage the financial and legal affairs of a person who is unable to do so themselves. The conservator has the power to make decisions related to finances, property, and investments on behalf of the incapacitated person.

In conservatorship, the focus is primarily on managing the financial and legal matters of the person, while guardianship focuses more on providing personal care and making decisions in the best interests of the individual. It's important to note that in some cases, an individual may require both a conservator and a guardian if they are unable to handle their financial affairs and personal care.

In conclusion, conservatorship and guardianship differ in terms of the authority granted and the areas of responsibility. Conservatorship deals with financial and legal matters, while guardianship focuses on personal care and well-being. Both serve to protect the interests of individuals who are unable to make decisions for themselves.

To know more about personal visit:

brainly.com/question/24174394

#SPJ11