I just need the answer.

To find the length of the segment between the given points, we can use the distance formula. The distance between two points $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2, y_2)$ is given by:
\[d = \sqrt{{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2}}\]

Let's apply this formula to the given points: $(2a, a-4)$ and $(4, -1)$.

The distance between these two points is $2\sqrt{10}$ units. So we have:
\[2\sqrt{10} = \sqrt{{(4 - 2a)^2 + (-1 - (a-4))^2}}\]

Simplifying the equation, we get:
\[4\sqrt{10} = \sqrt{{(4 - 2a)^2 + (-5 - a)^2}}\]

Squaring both sides of the equation, we have:
\[160 = (4 - 2a)^2 + (-5 - a)^2\]

Expanding the equation, we get:
\[160 = 16 - 16a + 4a^2 + 25 + 10a + a^2\]

Combining like terms, we have:
\[0 = 5a^2 - 6a + 1\]

Now, we can solve this quadratic equation for the possible values of $a$.

Factoring the equation, we have:
\[0 = (5a - 1)(a - 1)\]

Setting each factor equal to zero and solving for $a$, we get:

\[5a - 1 = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad a = \frac{1}{5}\]
\[a - 1 = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad a = 1\]

Therefore, the possible values for $a$ are $\frac{1}{5}$ and $1$. The product of these values is:
\[\left(\frac{1}{5}\right) \cdot 1 = \frac{1}{5}\]

So, the product of all possible values for $a$ is $\frac{1}{5}$.

Learn more about distance formula here : brainly.com/question/25841655

#SPJ11

Answer:55%

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 20 in total with 11 shaded. Percentages are always out of 100,so 20x5=100 and you do the same with 11. So 11x5=55%.

The nonresponse caused the results of the survey to be biased as C. Those who did not respond caused a violation of the assumption of independence.

It should be noted that each person in a simple random sample of 1,200 received a survey, and 325 people returned their survey. How could nonresponse cause the results of the survey to be biased?

In this case, the nonresponse caused rhe results of the survey to be biased as those who did not respond caused a violation of the assumption of independence. Those who did not respond may differ in some important way from those who did respond

Learn more about sample on;

https://brainly.com/question/24466382

#SPJ1

The result of moving 9 units to the left and 3 units up is (2,11) in the 1st quadrant.

Refer to the graph given below:

Therefore, the result of moving 9 units to the left and 3 units up is (2,11) in the 1st quadrant.

Know more about quadrants here:

https://brainly.com/question/25038683

#SPJ9

The feasibility area is empty. The solution of the LP-problem is not possible (does not exists).

With the constraint that x and y are both non-negative, the second constraint has only one point in common with each of the first and third constraints; and those two points are different.

The feasibility region is empty; so nothing can be optimized.

Plots x + 2y = 30 (red),  2x + 2y = 30 (green)  and  2x+y = 30 (blue)

The feasibility area, according to the condition, is the area of the first quadrant

   - above the red line,

   - below the green line,

   - above the blue line.

It can be seen from the plot that this set is empty.

Therefore, the feasibility area is empty. The solution of the LP-problem is not possible (does not exists).

To learn more about linear inequations refer here

https://brainly.com/question/25799000

#SPJ4

Disclaimer

The question given by you is incomplete, so the above solution is of a similar question, and the question is

Solve the LP problem. If no optimal solution exists, indicate whether the feasible region is empty or the objective function is unbounded. HINT

Maximize p = x + y subject to

x + 2y ≥ 30

2x + 2y ≤ 30

2x + y ≥ 30

x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0.

p=

(x, y)=

Answer:

S.A for Edmentum and Plato

Like and Rate

No. For each set of parallel lines, pairs of alternate interior angles are congruent, pairs of alternate exterior angles are congruent, and pairs of same-side interior angles are supplementary. This is the same result as in questions 2 through 4.

No. For each set of parallel lines, pairs of alternate interior angles are congruent, pairs of alternate exterior angles are congruent, and pairs of same-side interior angles are supplementary. This is the same result as in questions 2 through 4.

If we modify the set of parallel lines by moving point A to different locations while ensuring that points A and B do not cross line EF, the relationships among the angles will not change. The statements regarding pairs of alternate interior angles being congruent, pairs of alternate exterior angles being congruent, and pairs of same-side interior angles being supplementary will still hold true.

The reason for this is that the properties of alternate interior angles, alternate exterior angles, and same-side interior angles are dependent on the fact that lines AB and CD are parallel. As long as AB and CD remain parallel, regardless of the position of point A, these angle relationships will remain consistent.

Learn more about parallel line

https://brainly.com/question/12065995

#SPJ2

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

They both share the same variable p, therefore you add the numbers to get the answer

Answer:

=12p

Step-by-step explanation:

The figures converted from fraction to decimal to percent (Questions 9-14) are given as follows:

       Percent                             Decimal                              Fraction

9)      316.2%.                            3.162                                   3 4861/30000

10)    6.94%.                              0.0694                                347/5000.
11)     15.27%.                             0.1527                                 1527/10000

12)    217 2761/3367%              2.178                                    1089/500

13)    723 12/21%                       7.236                                  1809/250
14)    87%                                  0.87                                     87/100

9) Given the compound fraction:   3 4861/30000

To convert 3 4861/30000 to a decimal, we first need to convert the mixed number to an improper fraction:

3 4861/30000 = (30000*3 + 4861)/30000

= 94861/30000

To convert this fraction to a decimal, we divide the numerator by the denominator:

94861/30000 ≈ 3.162

To convert 3 4861/30000 to a percentage, we multiply the decimal by 100:

3.162 x 100 ≈ 316.2%

So, 3 4861/30000 as a percentage is approximately 316.2%

10)  Given the decimal 0.0694
To convert 0.0694 to a fraction, we can write it as the numerator over a power of 10, where the power of 10 has the same number of digits as the number of decimal places in the original number:

0.0694 = 694/10000

We can simplify this fraction by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by their greatest common factor, which is 2:

694/10000 = (3472)/(50002) = 347/5000

So, 0.0694 as a fraction is 347/5000.


To convert 0.0694 to a percentage, we multiply the decimal by 100:

0.0694 x 100 = 6.94%

So, 0.0694 as a percentage is 6.94%.


11) Given the decimal - 0.1527

To convert 0.1527 to a percentage, we multiply the decimal by 100:

0.1527 x 100 = 15.27%

So, 0.1527 as a percentage is 15.27%.

To convert 0.1527 to a fraction, we can write it as the numerator over a power of 10, where the power of 10 has the same number of digits as the number of decimal places in the original number:

0.1527 = 1527/10000

12) Given the compound percentage - 217 2761/3367%

To convert 217 2761/3367% to a decimal, we first need to convert the mixed number to an improper fraction:

217 2761/3367% = (3367*217 + 2761)/3367% = 733400/3367%

743032/3367% = 217.82001782%
217.82001782% = 2.1782001782
220.680724681% \(\approx\) 2.178

Thus, in fraction:

2.178 = 2.178/1

Multiply to remove 3 decimal places. Here, you multiply top and bottom by 10³ = 1000

= 2.178/1 x 1000/1000

= 2178/1000

= 1089/500


13) Given the compound fraction - 723 12/21%


To convert 723 12/21% to a decimal, we first need to convert the mixed number to an improper fraction:

723 12/21% = (21*723 + 12)/21% = (15195/21)%

(15315/21)% = 7.23571428571
15315/21%  \(\approx\) 7.236


Converting 7.236 to fraction:

7.236 = 7.236/1


Multiply to remove 3 decimal places. Here, you multiply top and bottom by 10³ = 1000


= 7.236/1 x 1000/1000

= 7236/1000: Divide numerator and denominator by 4

= (7236÷ 4)/(1000÷4)

= 1809/250


14) Given 0.87:

To convert 0.87 to a percentage, we multiply the decimal by 100:

0.87 x 100 = 87%

So, 0.87 as a percentage is 87%.

To convert 0.87 to a fraction, we can write it as the numerator over a power of 10, where the power of 10 has the same number of digits as the number of decimal places in the original number:

0.87 = 87/100

Learn more about Fractions:
https://brainly.com/question/28699958
#SPJ1

Answer:

3x-1 >x

Step-by-step explanation:

greater than number itself >x. one less is -1. product of number and 3 is 3x

Answer:

B.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the main goal for Marco is to stay under his budget which is 279, it's expected that he would want to spend less than or equal to his budget and that is the point to spend less than our goal of spending limit. If the cost of uniform and the cost of each of his classes are less than how much money he wants to spend, than that is going to still be within his budget even if the equation equals to 279 it is still within his budget anything greater would be consider over spending past his budget. Therefore making all other equations false.

Answer:

Amount set aside for food = 0.12 × 4,000

Step-by-step explanation:

His net pay = $4,000

His budget

Food = 12% of his budget

Assume $4,000 is his budget

Then,

Food = 12% of $4,000

= 12/100 × 4,000

= $480

The Equation is

Amount set aside for food = 0.12 × 4,000

The equation would be set up as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} \rm {Amount \: for \: food \: pay} &= \dfrac{12 \times 4000}{100}\\&= \$\:480 \end{aligned}\)

Given that:

Amount of net pay is $4,000

Percentage of budget used for food is 12%

To calculate the amount towards food, we'll take out 12% of amount of net pay which is $4,000.

It would be written symbolically as:

\(\begin{aligned} \rm {Amount \: for \: food \: pay} &= \dfrac{12 \times 4000}{100}\\&= \$\:480 \end{aligned}\)

Thus, amount for food pay is in total $ 480, and is calculated by above equation.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/14503887

The closest percent markup cost to the bracelets Anna sells is 181%.

To determine the percent markup cost for the bracelets Anna sells, we need to calculate the difference between the selling price and the cost price, and then express it as a percentage of the cost price.

The selling price of the bracelets is $45, and the cost price is $16.

Markup = Selling Price - Cost Price

= $45 - $16

= $29

Now, to calculate the percent markup cost, we divide the markup by the cost price and multiply by 100:

Percent Markup Cost = (Markup / Cost Price) \(\times\) 100

= ($29 / $16) \(\times\) 100

= 181.25

Rounded to the nearest whole number, the percent markup cost is approximately 181%.

Therefore, the closest percent markup cost to the bracelets Anna sells is 181%.

This means that Anna is charging customers approximately 181% more than what it cost her to make the bracelets.

The markup cost represents the additional amount she adds to cover expenses, overhead, and to make a profit.

For similar question on selling price.

https://brainly.com/question/28189871  

#SPJ11

To determine which set of data most likely has a mean closest to 29.5, we need to analyze the shape and position of the histograms in relation to the value 29.5.

Looking at the histograms described:

The first histogram ranges from 9 to 48, and the upward trend starts from 1 and ends at 33, followed by a downward trend. This histogram suggests that there may be values lower than 29.5, which would bring the mean below 29.5.

The second histogram ranges from 15 to 48, with an upward trend from 1 to 30 and then a downward trend. Similar to the first histogram, it suggests the possibility of values lower than 29.5, indicating a mean below 29.5.

The third histogram ranges from 12 to 56, and the upward trend starts from 1 and ends at 32, followed by a downward trend. This histogram covers a wider range but still suggests the possibility of values below 29.5, indicating a mean below 29.5.

The fourth histogram ranges from 15 to 54 and exhibits multiple trends. While it has fluctuations, it covers a wider range and includes both upward and downward trends. This histogram suggests the possibility of values above and below 29.5, potentially resulting in a mean closer to 29.5.

Based on the descriptions, the fourth histogram, with its more varied trends and wider range, is most likely to have a mean closest to 29.5.

For such more question on histograms

https://brainly.com/question/2962546

#SPJ8

Answer: No, it is not proportional.

Explanation:

We can see that Diego opened an account with $20, meaning that there is going to be a y-intercept of 20 in a graph. Therefore, with a y-intercept of 20 and not zero, we can say that there is not a proportional relationship between and time and amount saved for Diego.

The null hypothesis assumes that the proportion of college students who believe in extraterrestrial life is the same or lower than the general population

The appropriate null and alternative hypothesis that tests whether the proportion of college students who believe in extraterrestrial life is greater than the general population can be expressed as follows:

Null hypothesis: The proportion of college students who believe in extraterrestrial life is equal to or less than the general population, or

H0: p <= 0.47

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of college students who believe in extraterrestrial life is greater than the general population, or

Ha: p > 0.47

where p is the true proportion of college students who believe in extraterrestrial life.

In other words, the null hypothesis assumes that the proportion of college students who believe in extraterrestrial life is the same or lower than the general population (i.e., there is no difference between the two populations), while the alternative hypothesis assumes that the proportion of college students who believe in extraterrestrial life is higher than the general population.

For more such questions on probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4

To find the probabilities, we need to use the properties of the sampling distribution of the sample mean when sampling from a normally distributed population.

a) The mean systolic blood pressure will be below 116 mmHg.

We need to calculate the probability that the sample mean is below 116 mmHg. We can use the Z-score formula:

Z = (x - μ) / (σ / sqrt(n))

where x is the given value (116 mmHg), μ is the population mean (115 mmHg), σ is the population standard deviation (sqrt(430.56) mmHg), and n is the sample size (20).

Using this formula, we can calculate the Z-score and then use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the corresponding probability.

b) The mean systolic blood pressure will be above 123 mmHg.

Similar to part (a), we need to calculate the probability that the sample mean is above 123 mmHg using the Z-score formula.

c) The mean systolic blood pressure will be between 109 and 124 mmHg.

We need to calculate the probability that the sample mean falls within the given range. This can be done by finding the probabilities for the lower and upper bounds separately using the Z-score formula and then finding the difference between the two probabilities.

d) The mean systolic blood pressure will be between 102 and 111 mmHg.

Similar to part (c), we need to calculate the probability that the sample mean falls within the given range using the Z-score formula.

Learn more about systolic blood pressure here: brainly.com/question/21130967

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

set the two equations equal to each other then solve for n

6n + 3 = 4n + 11

2n = 8

n = 4

plug n in for both equations

6(4) + 3

24 + 3 = 27

4(4) + 11

16 + 11 = 27

27 + 27 = 54

the distance is 54

Answer: 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

First you multiply both numerators which equals 8

Then, you multiply the denomerators which is 24

This gives you 8/24

Since both 8 and 24 are divisible by 8, you divide them by 8 and you get 1/3

Since two negative numbers equal a positive one, the answer is positive

The maximum rate of change of function f at the given point occurs in the direction of the gradient vector.

To find the maximum rate of change of a function f at a given point, we need to compute the gradient of the function and evaluate it at that point. The gradient represents the direction of steepest ascent, and its magnitude indicates the maximum rate of change.

By finding the partial derivatives of f with respect to each variable and evaluating them at the given point, we obtain the components of the gradient vector. The maximum rate of change occurs in the direction of this gradient vector. Without the specific function and point, it is not possible to determine the exact maximum rate of change or its direction.

Learn more about rate of change

brainly.com/question/29181688

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

first of all I have to say the range should be " y >= 0" and not just "y > 0", because x can be 0, and then y is 0 too.

but under the the same assumption of the definition above, the correct answer is B, y < 0.

because a×|x| means we multiply a negative value with a positive value. and that result is always a negative value.

so, it cannot be C.

and it cannot be A, because

if |x| < 1 (e.g. 0.5), then a×|x| > a, as e.g. -1 > -2

Given:

f(3)=10

The rate of change over the interval 3≤x≤5 is 15.

To find:

The value of f(5).

Solution:

The formula to find the slope or rate of change of function f over the interval [a,b] is

\(m=\dfrac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}\)

Using this formula, the the rate of change of a function f over the interval 3≤x≤5 is

\(m=\dfrac{f(5)-f(3)}{5-3}\)

Rate of change is 15 and f(3)=10. So,

\(15=\dfrac{f(5)-10}{2}\)

Multiply both sides by 2.

\(30=f(5)-10\)

\(30+10=f(5)\)

\(40=f(5)\)

Therefore, the value of f(5) is 40.

Answer:

A,B,D,E

Step-by-step explanation:

The statements which are true shown below,

From graph attached below, It is observed that

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/19742435

Answer:

No . Natural numbers are a subset of whole number. Negative numbers are entire numbers but not natural. And any set that contains it. For example, the set {1, 2.3, 2.236067977} or {-79000, pi, 2.236067977, sin(47)} or all real numbers, etc

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: The decimal could be two-tenths.

Step-by-step explanation:

Two tenth as a product of decimals, 2/10 = 0.2. What this means is that a tenth is on of equal parts of something. e.g i received two tenth of the 30 bananas, what this implies is that he received 6 pieces of the bananas and this can be gotten by 2/10*30 = 6.

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Volume ≅ 1407.4

Step-by-step explanation:

Since this shape is a cylinder we need to use the formula for the bolume of a cylinder, which is...

V = π\(r^{2}h\)

(where "h" is the heigh of the cylinder)

Now we just substatute the values, and so we get...

V = π\(r^{2} h\)

V = π\(8^{2}(7)\)

V = 64π(7)

V = 448π

V ≅ 1407.4

- 8 / 20 = y / - 4

y = - 4 × - 8 / 20

y = 4 × 8 / 4 × 5

y = 8 / 5

The sum of the values of x where the vertical asymptotes of f/g are located is -2+6+(-3)=1.

The vertical asymptotes of a rational function occur at the values of x that make the denominator equal to zero. Thus, we need to find the values of x that make either 2x^2-2x-24 or 3x+9 equal to zero, since these are the denominators of f(x) and g(x), respectively.

The quadratic equation 2x^2-2x-24=0 can be factored as 2(x+2)(x-6)=0, so the values of x that make f(x) undefined (i.e. the vertical asymptotes of f/g) are x=-2 and x=6.

The linear equation 3x+9=0 can be solved to give x=-3, which is the value of x that makes g(x) undefined.

Thus, the sum of the values of x where the vertical asymptotes of f/g are located is -2+6+(-3)=1.

Learn more about vertical asymptotes here

https://brainly.com/question/30465465

#SPJ11