how many arrests are made in the u.s. each year for drug-law violations?

Out of the above-mentioned alternatives, it may be said that the supremacy clause is formed with an intention to declare that the national laws take precedence over the state laws in the judicial branches. Therefore, the option D holds true.

The Supremacy Clause is an integral inclusion in the National Constitution of the United States. Furthermore, the supremacy clause also takes the regulation to maintain that the laws made by the federal authorities will have a precedence over those created under the state laws.

Learn more about the supremacy clause here:

https://brainly.com/question/2212707

#SPJ4

Complete question

the supremacy clause of the constitution declares which of the following: question 1 options:

the president is the supreme commander of the armed forces

the supreme court can veto legislation through an advisory opinion

the supreme court is subject to recall by a 2/3rds vote in the senate

national laws take precedence over state laws

Answer: im no jugde but he did commit a crime so i say deny

Explanation:

The term "crackdowns" refers to a brief period of highly active police enforcement that results in numerous arrests and is focused on a certain location or kind of crime.

To learn more about crackdowns, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14900793

Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.

Student loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses  while  scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.

When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.

Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.

Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893

The process giving someone the legal right to practice a profession is called licensing.

Licensing is the process by which a regulatory authority grants permission to an individual to legally engage in a specific profession or occupation. It typically involves meeting certain requirements, such as completing education or training, passing examinations, and demonstrating competency in the field. The purpose of licensing is to ensure that practitioners meet minimum standards of knowledge, skill, and ethical conduct to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare.

Certification, on the other hand, is a voluntary process that verifies an individual's knowledge and skills in a particular area of practice. It is often provided by professional organizations and demonstrates a level of expertise beyond basic competence.

Matriculation refers to the process of enrolling in a school or college, rather than obtaining the legal right to practice a profession. Professional ethics refers to the moral principles and standards that guide the behavior and conduct of professionals in their respective fields.

Professional development refers to the ongoing process of enhancing one's knowledge, skills, and abilities in a particular profession through continuing education, training programs, and other learning opportunities. It is not specifically tied to the initial legal right to practice.

To learn more about licensing, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/15829119

#SPJ11

if a defendant is denied their right to appeal based on the fact that they have already served the time of their sentence, this decision falls under the Double jeopardy.

Double jeopardy is a legal principle that protects individuals from being tried or punished twice for the same offense. According to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, no person shall “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”

This means that if a defendant has already served the time of their sentence, they cannot be tried again or punished further for the same offense. This protection applies even if the defendant is later found to be innocent of the crime they were originally convicted of. In essence, double jeopardy prevents the government from punishing a person more than once for the same offense. It is a fundamental right that all individuals are entitled to, regardless of the severity of the crime.

Know more about Double jeopardy here

https://brainly.com/question/26602409#

#SPJ11

Doctrine applies in construction contracts and means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for Substantial performance Therefore the correct option is D.

Substantial performance is a doctrine that applies in construction contracts, and it means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for. This doctrine focuses on the idea of whether or not, even if there are minor mistakes or issues with the building's quality,

it still provides substantial performance to meet the standard of what was contracted for. The concept here is that if the overall quality of a building is close enough to meet the contract specifications and acceptable construction code requirements then any minor deficiencies can be overlooked.

Hence the correct option is D

To know more about Substantial performance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29434580

#SPJ4

Selling goods/services equal to the production cost is not necessarily considered an unfair competitive practice. In fact, it can be a common practice in many industries.

When goods/services are sold at cost, it means that the price is set to cover the expenses incurred in producing them, such as raw materials, labor, and overhead costs. However, selling goods/services below the production cost, also known as predatory pricing, can be seen as unfair competition.

This is because it can drive competitors out of the market by temporarily offering prices that are lower than what it costs to produce the goods/services. To determine whether selling at production cost is fair or unfair, it's important to consider other factors such as market conditions, competition, and the long-term sustainability of the business.

To know more about competitive visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2570802
#SPJ11:

The first amendment to the constitution of the United States is the amendment that has to do with the protection of the rights of the people of the United States.

This is the amendment of the United States that gives the people of the nation the needed rights and the freedom that they have to exist in the nation. They are the laws that has given the people the liberty to express themselves from the time it was created.

The law has it that the government would at no time make laws that would take away the fundamental rights of the people.

The protection of the rights of the people gives the people the ability to have free speech, assemble peacefully, engage in protests and also have the ability to religion.

Hence we can conclude that The first amendment to the constitution of the United States is the amendment that has to do with the protection of the rights of the people of the United States.

Read more on first amendment here: https://brainly.com/question/325850

#SPJ1

Answer 1,2,8,13 15

Explanation: 1st amendment gives people the rights to religion of their choice, it also gives people the right to speak up for what they believe

2nd amendment allows people to keep and bear arms for one to protect themselves and other around them

8th amendment makes sure people do not get a cruel punishment for something minor

13th amendment allowed slaves to be free, giving them a chance into their own lives

15th amendment makes sure you cannot deny someone the right to vote based on gender or color

Answer:

C. Bonds

Explanation:

A P E X

Savings accounts, cash ISAs, annuities, government bonds and protected funds are considered low risk investments. Cash is the most stable investment option, but the returns are not usually as high as fixed-interest securities.

Correct option is C.

"Bonds" are an example of a low-risk investment.

A bond is a financial instrument that allows an investor to lend money to a borrower, such as a corporation or the government. The money is used to fund the borrower's operations, and the investor is paid interest on the investment. A bond's market value might fluctuate over time.

To know more about Low-risk investment, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/25264302

Answer: a federal system was right for a new nation because it did not put one person in power but more than one in power to keep it from becoming one person making all the changes. Sorry if it didn’t make sense didn’t know how to word it.

Explanation:

Answer: I would give a longer sentence to the individual who is older and has a history of juvenile delinquency.

Explanation:   Because the younger individual without a record of wrongdoing ought to be given the opportunity to do better with an excessive penalty for a single infringement hanging over his head.  He is a good candidate for rehabilitation.  The older individual with the history of delinquency is clearly not learning from his mistakes and may perhaps require a more definite lesson on the error of his ways as a wake up call.  He is not beyond rehabilitation but he may perhaps require a stronger wake- up call in order to mend his ways.

Answer: A. interest group

Answer:  

A. interest group

Explanation: hope u have a great day

Victimology was examined by Mawby and Walklate as a social phenomena. Positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology are some of the three subtypes that they fall under. The majority of the time, support positive victimology.

What is victimology?

The term "victimology" is the study of crime victims. The field of victimology critically examines and perpetrator of the crime.

There are three positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology. They believe in most of the time as positive victimology because they contributed in socio-culture and dominant individual thy focuses tends to be interpersonal crime.

As a result, there are three positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology.

Learn more about on victimology, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27625447

#SPJ1

The court which has original jurisdiction over cases involving controversies between two or further countries is the US Supreme Court.

Original jurisdiction is the capacity of a court to hear a case for the first time. It can be distinguished from appellate governance, which is a court's capability to consider a case that a lower court has preliminarily heard and determined.

The Supreme Court's governance — its power to hear cases is established under Composition III, Section II of the Constitution. Certain cases, similar as suits involving two or further countries and/ or cases involving ministers and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original governance.

To learn more on original jurisdiction, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13961368

#SPJ4

The federal judiciary is the judicial branch of the federal government. It comprises of the Supreme Court and the lesser federal courts that Congress established. The Supreme Court and the High Court are the only courts with the authority to decide on rights under the federal legal system.

An organized community is regulated by a structure or a collection of people, frequently a state. In the case of its broad associative definition, government typically comprises of the legislative, executive, and judicial departments. Government serves as both a mechanism for formulating and enforcing organizational policy. In many countries, a statement outlining the principles and philosophy of the government serves as the equivalent of a constitution.

Even though all entities have governance, the word "government" is commonly used to more specifically refer to the approximately 200 distinct national governments and related institutions. Between these two fundamental subcategories of contemporary political systems are democracies, totalitarian regimes, and authoritarian regimes with a variety of hybrid regimes.

Learn more about government here:

brainly.com/question/4160287

#SPJ4

The manner in which a law is implemented distinguishes it from an executive order.

Either the President of the United States or the Governor of a state may issue an executive order. The President's directives are related to how the federal government is run. They are frequently employed by governors in issues involving public health.

An executive order has legal standing, thus breaking it could have repercussions. Also, executive orders are often issued considerably more quickly than laws. Unlike presidential orders, which cannot be revoked by Congress, laws must be approved by Congress.

Additionally, they are both well-documented and formally recorded. The Code of Federal Regulation, the official compilation of all federal rules and regulations, governs both presidential executive orders and federal statutes.

To know more about "executive order" visit-

brainly.com/question/18973126

#SPJ4

The decision to warn third parties is complex and requires careful consideration of the situation to avoid negative repercussions.

When it comes to the requirement of helping professionals to warn third parties of threats, some conflicts might arise. Here are some of the conflicts involved in requiring helping professionals to warn third parties of threats. Confidentiality: One of the conflicts that arise is confidentiality. As helping professionals, they are expected to keep the information provided by clients confidential. However, the requirement to warn third parties about threats could lead to breaching confidentiality. Hence, they find it difficult to balance between protecting the client’s privacy and ensuring public safety.  Therefore, the requirement to warn third parties could impact the therapeutic relationship. Negative repercussions: Some helping professionals are not comfortable with the requirement to warn third parties of threats because of potential negative repercussions. Finally, the requirement to warn third parties could lead to conflicts when the warning is ignored. There are cases where warning signs were ignored by third parties or were not taken seriously, leading to negative consequences. Hence, it raises the question of what the helping professional could have done differently or whether it was right to warn third parties in the first place. In conclusion, the conflicts involved in requiring helping professionals to warn third parties of threats range from mistrust to breaching confidentiality.

Learn more about  warn third parties here:

https://brainly.com/question/3246740

#SPJ11

Answer: yes its true

Explanation:

Answer: True

Explanation: Just looked it up

The IR theory proposed that focuses on the goal of a state to increase its relative security is called "Realism." This theory emphasizes that states operate in an anarchic international system, where their primary objective is to ensure their survival and enhance their security. Realists argue that states seek to achieve this goal by maintaining a balance of power, building strong military capabilities, and pursuing strategic alliances. Realism is an international relations theory that posits the central goal of a state is to enhance its relative security in an anarchic world.

The theory proposed that the goal of a state is to increase its relative security is known as the Realist theory. According to Realism, states are the primary actors in international relations and they pursue their own self-interests. In the pursuit of security, states seek to increase their power and influence relative to other states. This can be achieved through various means, such as military buildup, alliances, or economic policies. The ultimate goal is to ensure the survival and prosperity of the state. Realists believe that the international system is characterized by anarchy and uncertainty, and therefore states must prioritize their own security above all else.
To know more about anarchic world visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29614218

#SPJ11

The most likely outcome of Taylor suing the Giants for the allegedly negligent warm-up throw is that the case will be dismissed.

In the scenario given, Taylor is suing the Giants for a warm-up throw that was allegedly negligently made. There are a few issues with the case, such as: If the throw was a warm-up throw, then it is unlikely to have been aimed at Taylor directly.

As such, it is difficult to prove that the Giants were negligent in their actions. If the Giants were negligent in their actions, it would be difficult to prove that the alleged negligence was the direct cause of Taylor's injury. Taylor would need to prove that the injury would not have occurred if the Giants had not been negligent, which is difficult to prove.

If the case does go to trial, the Giants would likely argue that Taylor assumed the risk of injury by attending the game in the first place. This is a common defense used in sports injury cases where the injured party knew or should have known that there was a risk of injury but participated in the activity anyway.

Based on these issues, it is most likely that the case will be dismissed. The burden of proof in personal injury cases is high, and it is difficult to prove that the Giants were negligent and that their negligence was the direct cause of Taylor's injury.

To know more about allegedly negligent refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30258088#

#SPJ11