How does social change happen?

Answer:

A, THE DEGREE OF DAMAGE OR LOSS.

Explanation:

Answer:

An act that is performed only by a human being and thus is proper to man. When a human being does such acts, they are called acts of man but not human acts. ... Acts of man, therefore, are acts shared in common by man and other animals, whereas human acts are proper to human beings.

Explanation:

Please mark as brainliest

The best theory of liability that would allow plaintiffs to recover regarding Indiana Power will be the traditional theory of tort liability.

It should be noted that liability simply means the obligation of a for to individuals or other firms.

In this case, the best theory of liability that would allow plaintiffs to recover regarding Indiana Power will be the traditional theory of tort liability.

Learn more about liability on:

https://brainly.com/question/14921529

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. The Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.

Explanation:

From Brainly

In case of serious crimes, the death penalty was often used excessively and seemed to be arbitrarily used based on the social status of the accused and not the severity of the crime.

For example, in some societies, the death penalty was used more often for crimes committed by the lower classes, while wealthy and powerful individuals were able to avoid punishment. Additionally, there were instances where the death penalty was used for minor crimes, such as stealing a loaf of bread to feed a starving family, rather than reserving it for the most heinous crimes like murder. This practice was often a result of flawed justice systems and corruption within the legal system. It highlights the need for reform and ensuring that the death penalty is used judiciously and only for the most severe crimes, regardless of social status or economic background.

to know about social status visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12510394

#SPJ11

True.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer:

nationalism is the concept of pride for your country, nationalists believe in the America first idea, and that nothing could ever top the individual liberties, policies, and freedoms of America

Answer:

Number of period(n) =277.65

Explanation:

Given:

Amount invested(p) = $1,000

Amount at the end of period(A) = 2 × Amount invested = 2 × $1,000 = $2,000

Rate of interest(r) = 0.25% = 0.0025

Find:

Number of period(n) = ?

Computation:

\(A=p(1+r)^n\\\\2,000 = 1,000 (1+0.0025)^n\\\\2=(1.0025)^n\\\\n = 277.65\)

Number of period(n) =277.65

The correct option is C). 30. Alcohol is a factor in 30% of Florida crash costs.

Alcohol is the major factor that contributes in 25% of Florida's crash costs.

Alcohol-related crashes in Florida cost estimated around $7.8 billion to the public in 2000, including $3.5 billion in terms of monetary costs and around $4.3 billion in terms of life losses.

However, Florida has adopted "no-fault" car insurance state, that makes  insurance claim process more efficient after a car accident.

Learn more about the Florida crash here:-

https://brainly.com/question/13378093

#SPJ2

Answer:

Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.

Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.

It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.

However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.

Learn more about cheese shop here:

https://brainly.com/question/22734191

#SPJ2

Answer:

Binding precedent relies on the legal principle of stare decisis.

Explanation:

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case.

Stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It ensures certainty and consistency in the application of law.

The concept of assisted self-killing is controversial. It is legal in some states and illegal in others. Hence, the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.

Assisted self-killing is a medical practice where a terminally ill patient is provided with the means to end their own life, typically through the administration of medication. It is a controversial and heavily debated topic, with proponents arguing for individual autonomy and compassion, and opponents arguing against intentionally ending human life.

Wilfred's request was related to self-killing. From a legal standpoint, the act of assisting in self-killing is a criminal offense in most states. Therefore, Martha could be subject to criminal charges for her actions. If manslaughter charges were filed against Martha, and I were on the jury, my decision would depend on the specific laws and circumstances of the case, such as the laws related to assisted self-killing in the said state. If the pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician, the situation would be different. In some states, assisted self-killing may be legal under certain circumstances, such as if the patient has a terminal illness and is in unbearable pain. In such cases, physicians may prescribe medication to ease the patient's pain, even if it may shorten their life. Some argue that individuals have the right to end their own lives in cases of terminal illness and unbearable pain, while others argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a human life. Legislators may consider factors such as individual autonomy, protection of vulnerable populations, and the potential impact on medical practice when deciding whether or not to legalize assisted self-killing.

Therefore, the concept of assisted self-killing is controversial and the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.

Learn more about assisted self-killing, here:

https://brainly.com/question/4748133

#SPJ2

The complete question is: Problems 9.1 Law and Justice Problem 9.1 The Case of The Dying Cancer Patient - Wilfred, age 75, has been suffering from cancer for 10 years. The pain associated with the cancer is severe and has become worse over time. Wilfred's doctors say there is no treatment to either slow down the cancer's growth or substantially reduce the pain. Wilfred asks Martha, his wife of 50 years, to relieve him of the terrible pain. He asks her to bring him a bottle of pills that will help him end his own life. Martha cannot stand watching Wilfred suffer anymore and gives him the pills. He swallows them all, slowly fades off to sleep, and dies. 1. Was Wilfred's request related to self-killing? Explain your answer. 2. If you were the district attorney in the state where Martha lives, would you file criminal charges against her? Explain. 3. If manslaughter charges were filed and you were on the jury, would you vote to convict Martha? Give your reasons. If Martha were convicted, what sentence should she receive? Why? 4. If the bottle of pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician instead of by his wife, would your answers have been different? Give your reasons. 5. If you were a state legislator, would you be in favor of or against a law allowing assisted self-killing? Explain why or why not?

They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)

Answer:

d

Explanation:

a two-thirds majority of Congress

Answer:

A steel die stamping device

Explanation:

Answer:

Because two states in the U.S. can't go to war,

Explanation:

States can not go to war or declare wars. To fix this they can meet a compromise.

Answer: Voice writers can be used to record everything that is said by judges, witnesses, attorneys, and other parties to a proceeding, including gestures and emotional reactions, and either provide real-time feed or prepare transcripts afterwards. Using the voice writing method, a court reporter speaks directly into a stenomask or speech silencer—a hand-held mask containing one or two microphones and voice-dampening materials. As the reporter repeats the testimony into the recorder, the mask prevents the reporter from being heard during testimony.

Hope this helps

Answer:

what grade

Explanation:

Go call the school file a report, try to calm down when stuff like that happens, try to explain what happened to your parents especially if they are upset don't talk back when explain when you feel like cussing them out back just drink water or laugh at them-hope it's helps

The difference between dominant alleles and recessive alleles is In heterozygous organisms, the dominant allele determines the phenotype (trait). The correct option is a)  In heterozygous organisms, the dominant allele determines the phenotype (trait).

There are two types of alleles; dominant and recessive alleles. The difference between dominant alleles and recessive alleles can be most scientifically explained as follows: Dominant alleles are expressed even when only one copy of the gene is present while recessive alleles are expressed only when two copies of the gene are present.

For example, if a person has one copy of a dominant allele for brown eyes and one copy of a recessive allele for blue eyes, the dominant allele will be expressed and the person will have brown eyes. If a person has two copies of the recessive allele for blue eyes, the recessive allele will be expressed and the person will have blue eyes.

Therefore, the most scientifically accurate statement about the difference between dominant alleles and recessive alleles is that dominant alleles are expressed even when only one copy of the gene is present while recessive alleles are expressed only when two copies of the gene are present. Hence The correct option is a)  In heterozygous organisms, the dominant allele determines the phenotype (trait).

To learn more about heterozygous organisms here:

https://brainly.com/question/3676361#

#SPJ11

Complete Question

Which of the following statements is most scientifically accurate about the difference between DOMINANT alleles and RECESSIVE alleles? (Remember that alleles are just different versions of a gene.)

a. In heterozygous organisms, the dominant allele determines the phenotype (trait).

b. Homozygous organisms have two different alleles for a particular gene.

c. Heterozygous organisms have two copies of the same allele for a particular gene.

d. Alleles are always either dominant or recessive.

e. Most dominant alleles produce non-functional proteins.

Answer:

what are you talking about, pal? Are you talking about Brainly? I got banned from brainly yesterday, but now I'm back. So screw all moderators- I only had 12 warnings while others have 30 something.

Answer:

episodes of sleeping that last more than 30 seconds

Crime has many different causes. People break the law for a variety of reasons, including low self-esteem, liquor and drug abuse, poverty, and parental neglect.

Some people are more likely to commit crimes because of the circumstances in which they were born. It is undeniable that poor housing, social inequality, low educational attainment, poor diet, low self-esteem, and impulsivity are all interrelated factors that contribute to criminal behavior and substance use. Criminals share a number of characteristics with one another.

3. More importantly, psycho physiological research can contribute to the understanding of criminality and delinquency theories by revealing the mechanisms that underpin deviant behavior. Character factors impact one's proclivity towards horrendous act. Insane ism anticipated self-detailed misconduct, while high maniacal ism and neuroticism anticipated under socialization, as indicated by Levine ET Al

4. Wrongdoing alludes to conduct that abuses cultural lawful or moral standards; It typically refers to actions that, if carried out by an adult, would be considered illegal. Numerous individual circumstances and characteristics have been linked to the emergence of adolescent delinquency. Age, gender, issues during pregnancy and delivery, impulsivity, aggression, and substance abuse are individual traits.

Learn more about criminal behavior :

brainly.com/question/30450608

#SPJ4

The highest level to which a case involving a question of state law can be carried would be the state's highest court, typically known as the supreme court.

When a legal case involves a question of state law, the state's highest court, often called the supreme court, is the highest level to which it can be taken.

This court is the ultimate judicial authority in the state and has the final say on all legal matters that fall under its jurisdiction.

As the highest court in the state, the supreme court has the power to review lower court decisions and determine whether they conform to state law.

The court's rulings on these matters are considered binding and final, and they establish legal precedents that lower courts must follow in the future.

The supreme court's decisions have far-reaching implications for the state, as they impact the interpretation and application of state law.

Therefore, the decisions made by the state's highest court have significant legal and practical consequences for citizens, businesses, and government entities within the state.

The highest level to which a case involving a question of state law can be carried would be the state's highest court, typically known as the supreme court.

Read more about  court

https://brainly.com/question/8433911

#SPJ11

Answer:

Here is the short story:

The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.

Explanation:

The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off.  The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.

This is false that Expropriation is the term used to describe a host-country government seizing the assets of a foreign corporation and providing no compensation in return.

Expropriation is when the government takes possession of property or alters current private property rights, usually for the benefit of the public. The risk of expropriation includes all discriminatory actions taken by a host government that strip an investor of their investment without providing adequate compensation; events such as embargos, changes in (legal) regimes, and denial of justice are included in the analysis of the expropriation risk.

Eminent domain power, often known as expropriation or condemnation, is one of the three major powers that the State has inherent in the exercise of sovereign authority, together with police power and taxation power. The Constitution forbids the government from pursuing land reform through restitution, redistribution, and tenure reform, but it does allow for the expropriation of land without compensation. The aim is not land that is privately held.

To know more about expropriation refer to:  https://brainly.com/question/13378291

#SPJ4