How does she/he support their arguments on these magazines?
TIME Magazine:
These 3 Common Arguments For Preserving the Electoral College Are Wrong -
Real Clear Politics:
Why We Need the Electoral College -
PBS NewsHour:
This proposal calls for popular vote to determine the winner -
Answers
Answer:
However, based on the titles you provided, I can provide a general explanation of how each magazine might support their arguments.
TIME Magazine may support its argument by providing evidence to show that the three common arguments for preserving the Electoral College are flawed or misguided. They may use examples from past elections, historical data, and expert analysis to support their claims.
Real Clear Politics may argue that the Electoral College is necessary to protect the interests of smaller states and rural areas. They may use data and statistics to show how the Electoral College helps to balance the power of voters in less populated states against those in more densely populated states.
PBS NewsHour may support the proposal for a popular vote to determine the winner by highlighting the flaws and limitations of the current Electoral College system. They may provide examples of how the current system has failed to reflect the will of the people and how a popular vote could provide a more accurate representation of the voters' preferences. They may also provide expert opinions and analysis to support their argument.
Explanation:
Related Questions
Please help, will give brainliest :)
Answers
Answer:
Yes as an investigaiter uderstanding Agathas motive would be important because she coud be getting the water cause she is realy be thirsty or she could be getting it to taget Eric by using the water excuse used to spy on him so hearing her motive would help me put as an investigator.
AS a jury it would be important to hear Agatha´s motive because I can hear why she was trespasing to get the water because she could be dehydrated and need the water. For a jury to hear her story would make to choose the choice of guilty or inicent and alos so she gets a chance to speak for herself then from what a investigator found.
What is not true of civil law
A. The burden of proof requires a “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard
B. The goal of punishment is to make monetary payment or issue an order to act
C. It’s purpose is to assign responsibility in a dispute between citizens
D. An attorney at no cost is not guaranteed
Answers
what is inter personal relationship
Answers
Interpersonal relationships are based on various factors such as trust, respect, understanding, communication, and empathy. These factors help individuals to connect with each other on a deeper level and build long-term relationships. Positive interpersonal relationships can have a significant impact on an individual's mental and emotional well-being, self-esteem, and overall quality of life.
If a contract requires one party to commit an illegal act, the contract is
necessarily
A. unconscionable
B. voidable
C. fraudulent
D. void
Answers
Answer:
the answer is A it makes the most sense
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Palo Alto is a city in Santa Clara County in California. If the Palo Alto city government passes a law, who must follow that law?
Answers
Answer:
Cali State
Explanation:
The major benefit of having the elastic clause in the United States
Constitution is that it
(1) allows the government to respond to changing conditions
(2) protects the rights of racial minorities
(3) prevents one branch of government from becoming too powerful
O (4) establishes a postal service
Answers
Answer:
(1) allows the government to respond to changing conditions
Explanation:
the entire reason for the constitution is that its a "living document" and the elastic clause outlines the "living" or changing aspect
The main advantage of the U. S. American constitution elastic clause would be that it permits the government to adjust to changing circumstances.
The "elastic clause" refers to the final specified authority. This clause grants Congress the authority to enact all legislation "necessary and suitable" to carry out the powers granted in the other Article I provisions.
So, Option "1" is the correct answer to the following question.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/18337199?referrer=searchResults
Article VII of the constitution describeds?
Answers
Answer:
how the U.S Constitution would be ratified.
Explanation:
A constitution refers to a set of written laws and principles which is typically used to determine the power and authority of the government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights of its citizens.
Hence, the Constitution is a formally written document that contains the set of laws that we live by in the United States of America. It guarantees certain rights to the federal government and the states such as right to taxation, regulate interstate commerce, declare war, borrow money, provide for the military forces, etc.
Basically, the Constitution accords powers to the national or federal government and these includes; enumerated or delegated, reflected, and concurrent powers.
Article VII is an article of the US Constitution and it is referred to as special state ratifying convention. Thus, it describes the ratification process for the Constitution of the United States of America by establishing that the Constitution shall be enacted by the U.S Congress to become the official law of the ratifying states when it's ratified by nine (9) states among the thirteen (13) states.
On the 7th of December, 1787, Delaware became the first state to ratify the U.S Constitution while New Hampshire was the ninth state to ratify it, doing so on the 21st of June, 1788.
In conclusion, Article VII of the Constitution of the United States of America describes how the Constitution would be ratified by the states.
What is a court case can the 10th ammendmant be applied to.
Answers
In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court struck down a federal law that prohibited guns in schools, ruling that the law exceeded Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and encroached on an area traditionally reserved for the states.
In Printz v. United States (1997), the Supreme Court struck down provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act that required state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers, ruling that this violated the Tenth Amendment by commandeering state officials to perform federal duties.
In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012), the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate as a valid exercise of Congress's taxing power, but struck down provisions of the law that required states to expand Medicaid, ruling that this coerced states into participating in a federal program and violated the Tenth Amendment.
What is the first thing done by the jury during deliberations?
Answers
Answer: jury selection begins with the court clerk's calling twelve people jury selection begins with the court clerk's calling twelve people on the jury list and asking them to take a place in the jury box.
Which of the following are civil service employees of the federal government? (Select all that apply.)
senior curator at the Smithsonian Museum
Supreme Court Chief Justice
field agent of the FBI
member of the military Joint Chiefs of Staff
15 POINTS
Answers
member of the military
Drag each tile to the correct box to complete the sequence.
Drag the steps of the policy-making process so that they are in the correct order.
issue identification
and agenda setting
policy formulation
policy adoption
policy implementation
and evaluation
Į
Answers
The correct order of these steps in the policy-making process is correct. 1.- issue recognizable proof and plan setting. 2. the creation of policies. 3. Policy implementation . 4. the evaluation and implementation of the policy.
What is the adopted policy?The public policy process that follows policy formulation defines policy adoption. The selection of alternative policies includes policy adoption.
The following actions are examples of how this can be applied.
To begin, the government includes a problem or issue that must be resolved among the considerations it must make.
The government then begins to prioritize in order to select the type of policy with the best chance of success in addressing the problem. At that point, the specialists develop and implement the particular policy. Finally, in order to make a decision, government officials must monitor and assess the policy's effectiveness: to carry it out, change it, or make big changes.
To learn more about policy-making visit :
https://brainly.com/question/24249658
#SPJ1
4. Mr. Gee had been accused of a crime and placed in jail. During his trial by jury, he was found not to
be guilty of a crime. Several months later, new evidence was found. Mr. Gee was placed in jail again for
the same crime as before and later brought to trial a second time.
What is this amendment
Answers
Answer:
Amendment 6 - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Explanation:
Two police officers enter a house under a search warrant that identifies drugs as the item to be searched for. While searching the home for places where they believed drugs would be hidden, the officers find counterfeit money. However, the search does not turn up any illegal drugs. Is this search legal? Explain.
Answers
Answer:
Its not ilegal
Explanation:
n general, the police don't have the power to search premises without a warrant unless they have obtained the permission of the person concerned,
No, the search conducted by the police in the above scenario is not legal as the police found the counterfeit money after deliberately searching the places where they expected drugs to be hidden and the counterfeit money was not in their plain sight.
Whenever a search warrant is issued, the police may use it to search only a particular area and seize specific items mentioned in the warrant. However, the police may also extend their scope of search and seizure if an illegal item which is not mentioned in the search warrant is present in their plain view during the course of the search.
Learn more about plain sight here:
https://brainly.com/question/15109018
#SPJ1
answer the question below please I have to go to the bathroom
Answers
Complex-risk situations in driving
are?
Answers
Adverse weather conditions: Driving in heavy rain, snow, fog, or ice can make the road slippery and reduce visibility, increasing the risk of collisions and skidding.
Distracted driving: Using a phone, eating, drinking, or engaging in other distracting activities while driving can divert the driver's attention from the road and increase the risk of accidents.
Driving under the influence: Operating a vehicle while under the influence of drugs or alcohol can impair judgment, slow reaction times, and increase the risk of collisions.
Fatigue and drowsiness: Driving while tired or sleep-deprived can impair a driver's ability to concentrate and react to changing road conditions, increasing the risk of accidents.
Reckless driving: Speeding, tailgating, weaving in and out of traffic, or engaging in other reckless behaviors can increase the likelihood of accidents and endanger others on the road.
Roadway construction and maintenance: Driving through construction zones or areas with poor road conditions can increase the risk of accidents due to reduced visibility, uneven surfaces, and changing traffic patterns.
It is important for drivers to be aware of these complex-risk situations and take appropriate measures to minimize their risk of accidents, such as driving defensively, following traffic laws, and avoiding distractions while driving
Complex-risk situations in driving are high-traffic roads with speed limits near 70 mph.
Major highways with speed restrictions of up to 85 mph are examples of complex risk situations. intersections between cities and suburbs. crowded multiple-lane roads.
Driving in rural places can be dangerous because of bad road conditions, inadequate lighting, and wildlife. Compared to urban and suburban roads, rural locations frequently have more potholes, cracks, and other obvious evidence of wear and tear. There is sometimes little or no street lighting on these roadways.
Learn more about driving, here;
https://brainly.com/question/2619161
#SPJ6
Officers responded to a robbery in progress at a convenience store. A young man with red hair was seen fleeing the scene. Investigators found blood on a broken plate of glass at the storefront and analyze it for DNA. Forensic biologists are unable to match the DNA to anyone in the crime database, so they turn to SNP analysis to do what?
A.
Check the blood for mutations
B.
Double check the information.
C.
See if the DNA predicts the blood is from a redhead.
D.
Evaluate if they did the first test correctly.
Answers
When forensic biologists are unable to match DNA from a crime scene to any individual in the crime database, they may use SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) analysis to further explore the DNA sample.Option C is the correct answer.
SNP analysis looks for differences in single nucleotides within a DNA sequence. In the case of the convenience store robbery, detectives would use SNP analysis to discover if the DNA sample included certain genetic markers associated with red hair.
Red hair is a genetic characteristic induced mostly by a mutation in the MC1R gene. This gene is in charge of producing melanin, the pigment that controls hair color. Forensic biologists can determine if an individual will have red hair by analysing the SNP patterns associated with the MC1R gene.
As a result, forensic biologists can establish whether the DNA sample obtained on the broken plate of glass includes the genetic markers associated with red hair by doing SNP analysis on it. If the SNP analysis indicates that the DNA came from a person with red hair, it could give a vital lead for police, reducing their hunt for the perpetrator.
Therefore the correct answer is option C
For more questions on crime database
https://brainly.com/question/30030030
#SPJ8
A man left his wife when he found out she had cancer and just assumed she had died, so he married another without getting a divorce. Years later, he discovers his wife was alive all this time.
IS HE GUILTY OF BIGAMY? BIGAMY IS THE ACT OR CONDITION OF ANY PERSON MARRYING YET ANOTHER PERSON WHILE STILL BEING LAWFULLY MARRIED.
Answers
Answer:
No. He didn’t know that his other wife was alive so it’s not his fault unless he knew his wife was dead. I hope this helped.
Explanation:
What event was a major determining factor in the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1861?
the Dred Scott Casev
the Three-Fifths Compromise
the Jim Crow laws
the Equal Rights Amendment
Answers
Answer:
the Dred Scott Case
Explanation:
The Dred Scott case was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1857, which held that African Americans could not be considered citizens of the United States and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision further fueled tensions between the North and the South over the issue of slavery, as it appeared to open the door to the expansion of slavery into new territories and states.
Chapter 2 Review crossword
Answers
state five ways through which political party can be funded
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Public funds, extortion, political fund raising, government funds, embezzembezzlement, or having a independently wealthy political leader.
Прочтите статью 49 Конституции Республики Узбекистан
и ответьте на следующие вопросы:
1. Какие обязательства закреплены в этой статье?
2. Как вы думаете, почему граждане обязаны оберегать
историческое, духовное и культурное наследие?
3. Я выполняю обязательства ... . Для меня ... очень
важно.
Answers
Answer:tet
Explanation:
ies
What is the arrest authority of a security guard ? How does it compare to the arrest authority of a peace officer?
Answers
Answer:
They stop the indivisual from proforming prohibited acts and ask him or her to leave the proprety. For a Police officer they will say you have the right to remain silent and you will have the right for an attorney adn if you do not hve an attorney one iwll be oppinted to you.
Explanation:
jelaskan pengertian Qadlo
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Awal kehidupan yang indah
LIMITED MEANS IS WHEN... you can have everything or you can have nothing or you can't have everything?
Answers
Answer: you can't have everything
Juneau, Alaska, has a Shop with a Cop program that is put into place during the holidays. Children are paired up with a policeman who takes them shopping for gifts. What kind of police program is this an example of?
Question 1 options:
specific deterrence program
community policing program
due process method program
police-community relationship program
Answers
Based on the fact that Juneau, Alaska, has a Shop with a Cop program that is put into place during the holidays, and children are paired up with a policeman who takes them shopping for gifts, this is an example of D. police-community relationship program
What is Policing?This refers to the process of law enforcement officers doing their job of securing lives and property and establishing a relationship with the community.
Hence, it can be seen that from the given scenario, the police program that is being done is in order to improve community relationship with the police.
Read more about policing here:
https://brainly.com/question/3177078
#SPJ1
Luther killed his wife, Sloane, by striking her repeatedly in the head with a hammer. He
confessed to the police that he did this because he believed that she was possessed by the Devil.
Although Luther claimed that he loved Sloane very much, he nonetheless told the authorities that
he believed that only by killing Sloane could he free her soul from the clutches of evil. At trial
for the murder of Sloane, Luther's defense counsel, trying to establish an insanity defense, put an
expert witness on the stand, a psychiatrist, who testified that X was in a psychotic state when he
killed Sloane and that "Luther was acting on the basis of delusional ideas with homicidal
impulses. These impulses were related to a suppressed post-traumatic stress disorder resulting
from Luther's having been sexually abused as a preschool child. This precipitated a psychotic
rage and led to him killing Sloane with a hammer. A rational person would not have assumed
that his wife was possessed by the Devil. Luther was basically in an intense psychotic state,
acting without thought. This was not a rational person; it was a psychotic rage. There was little
thought given to his criminal actions." In rebuttal, the prosecution presented testimony by a
forensic psychiatrist who opined that "Luther was psychosis-free when he killed Sloane, but
there are two other possible explanations for his behavior: paranoia and schizophrenia. I am
confident that Luther knew exactly what he was doing when he beat her to death. In my opinion,
he would not have been able to do what he did to Sloane if he had been psychotic." Given this
competing expert testimony, what are Luther's chances of being found not guilty of murder by
reason of insanity in these circumstances?
Answers
Answer: he is most likely going to be guilty because he still killed his wife
Explanation:
Answer:
Those found to have been not guilty by reason of mental disorder or insanity are generally then required to undergo psychiatric treatment in a mental institution, except in the case of temporary insanity
Explanation:
Distinguish between the concepts of governmental crime, state crime, and political white collar crime. Identify as well the special significance of the following concepts: abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal. In what respects are the first set of concepts controversial, and how do they relate to the traditional concept of white collar crime? Why has governmental crime been relatively neglected by criminologists?
Answers
1. Governmental Crime: Governmental crime refers to criminal activities committed by individuals or groups within the government or associated with government functions. This can include illegal actions such as abuse of power, human rights violations, illegal surveillance, and misconduct by government officials.
2. State Crime: State crime involves illegal actions that are perpetrated or sanctioned by the state itself. This includes crimes committed in the pursuit of state policies or interests, such as war crimes, genocide, torture, and state-sponsored terrorism.
3. Political White-Collar Crime: Political white-collar crime refers to illegal activities committed by individuals in positions of political power or influence, often involving financial fraud, bribery, embezzlement, or other forms of corruption. These crimes typically occur in political contexts and involve abuses of power for personal or political gain.
The concepts of abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal have special significance within these contexts:
- Abuse of Power: This refers to the misuse of authority or position for personal or political gain, often involving actions that violate laws, policies, or ethical norms.
- Corruption: Corruption involves the misuse of public power for private gain. It includes actions such as bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and favoritism, which undermine the integrity and fairness of government institutions.
- Bribery: Bribery involves offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting something of value as a means to influence the actions or decisions of a person in a position of power or authority.
- Political Scandal: Political scandals typically involve public exposure and scrutiny of unethical or illegal activities by individuals or groups in the political sphere. These scandals can damage reputations, erode public trust, and have far-reaching political consequences.
The first set of concepts, particularly governmental crime and state crime, can be controversial for several reasons:
1. Lack of Consensus: There may be debates and disagreements over what actions should be considered criminal when committed by governments or states, as the legal framework for defining and prosecuting these offenses can vary across jurisdictions.
2. Sovereign Immunity: Governments and state actors often enjoy certain immunities and legal protections that can make holding them accountable for criminal acts challenging.
3. Political Sensitivity: Investigating and addressing governmental and state crimes can be politically sensitive, as it may involve challenging or questioning the legitimacy and actions of those in power.
These concepts relate to the traditional concept of white-collar crime in that they often involve non-violent offenses committed by individuals in positions of power or influence. However, governmental crime and state crime focus specifically on the actions of government entities or individuals associated with the government, whereas white-collar crime encompasses a broader range of economic and financial offenses committed by individuals in professional or business contexts.
Governmental crime has been relatively neglected by criminologists for various reasons:
1. Focus on Street Crime: Criminology traditionally has had a strong focus on street crime, such as robbery, assault, and drug offenses, while governmental crime has received less attention.
2. Political Factors: Governmental crime involves powerful actors and institutions, making it politically sensitive to investigate and study. This can create obstacles and resistance to research and analysis.
3. Data Availability: Obtaining data on governmental crime can be challenging due to issues of transparency, limited access to official records, and the covert nature of certain crimes.
True or False. If you are parked on the side of the road and need assistance, you should raise your
hood.
False
True
Subog answer
Answers
Answer:
the answer iz true for this
How much control should a government have over an individual’s rights regarding vaccination?
Answers
Answer:
The question of how much control a government should have over an individual's rights regarding vaccination is a complex and controversial issue. On one hand, vaccines are an effective public health tool that can prevent the spread of infectious diseases and protect the population as a whole. However, vaccination also involves personal medical decisions and individual rights.
Generally, governments have the authority to mandate vaccines for certain groups, such as healthcare workers or schoolchildren, to protect public health. However, some people may object to mandatory vaccination on religious, philosophical, or medical grounds, and there may be concerns about government overreach and infringement on individual rights.
Ultimately, the balance between individual rights and public health needs will vary depending on the specific circumstances and the culture and values of a given society. It is important for governments to engage in open and transparent communication about the benefits of vaccines and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases, while also respecting individual autonomy and providing education and resources to help people make informed decisions about their own health.
discuss 5
fractures of representatives government using Nigeria democracy
Answers
Nigeria's representative government faces fractures in accountability, disconnection between representatives and citizens, self-interest in political parties, electoral irregularities, and ethnic/religious divisions.
What are the fractures of representatives government in Nigeria democracy?In Nigeria's representative government, five fractures can be identified.
Firstly, there is a lack of accountability, as elected officials often engage in corruption and misuse of public funds.
Secondly, there is a disconnection between representatives and the citizens they are supposed to represent, resulting in a gap in understanding and addressing the needs of the people.
Thirdly, political parties prioritize personal interests over public welfare, leading to a lack of effective governance.
Fourthly, electoral irregularities and voter suppression undermine the democratic process.
Lastly, ethnic and religious divisions contribute to a fragmented society, hampering unity and cooperation among representatives. These fractures challenge the effectiveness and integrity of Nigeria's democracy.
Learn more about Nigeria democracy on:
https://brainly.com/question/30451398
#SPJ1