How does a President usually exercise the power of recognition?
a.negotiating treaties with a new nation
b. negotiating executive agreements with a new nation
c.exchanging diplomats with a new nation
d. sending the secretary of defense to a new nation

Answer:

O Had lost half the land they held in 1881.

Explanation:

The Dawes Act of 1887 was passed by the government of the United States to make native Indians more included in the government and also to possibly open their lands for more white settlers. This law requires the Indian lands to be individualized and distributed among the owners.

What this law led to was that the Indians refused to give up their lands. Moreover, to be included in the citizenship of the nation, they had to 'offer' their lands. This means that only those who accepted the individual plots were granted citizenship, thereby excluding the majority of the American Indians. This resulted in the loss of half of the lands that they had held in 1881.

Thus, the correct answer is the second option.

Answer:

Conservative

Hope that helps — and good morning!

The Oldest university in Philippines is: The University of Santo Tomas. The University of Santo Tomas was established in the year 1611 making it the oldest university in Philippines.

A university is a citadel of learning where people go to acquire knowledge, skills. Universities help mold individuals in character and in learning. When an individual has satisfactorily completed his courses and made good grades, he is awarded a degree in that course of study.

The University of Santo Tomas is the oldest university. It has seen great men and women pass through it. They have helped millions get a degree and mold them in character and learning. It was established in 1611.

Learn more about University here:

https://brainly.com/question/1086066

Answer:

Explanation:

is the blacks because in amarica is the rasited and when it happened is that the blacks is the most thing in the world that happened when roselvelt helped by doing whats right

Answer:

It used to be very brutal. You could be executed on the spot, but today you get charged a fine.

The statement that, though there are challenges and successes in the last 26 years (1994-2020) South Africa has changed to be a free democratic equal and just society , is False.

While noteworthy progress has undoubtedly been achieved since the dismantling of apartheid and the advent of democratic governance, it is imperative to acknowledge that the realization of a genuinely free, democratic, equal, and just society is an intricate and ongoing endeavor.

South Africa's transition from the oppressive system of apartheid to a democratic order brought forth pivotal political reforms, including the establishment of an inclusive and non-racial government, along with the adoption of a progressive constitution that upholds fundamental rights and liberties.

Find out more on South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/30989532

#SPJ1

Question is:

Though there are challenges and successes in the last 26 years (1994-2020) South Africa has changed to be a free democratic equal and just society.

True

False

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (the "PCA"), India's main anti-corruption law, makes it illegal for "public servants" to receive any "undue benefit" and for anyone to give such an advantage.

The political body of a country must be chosen by popular vote in accordance with federalism and the democratic ethos. This gives each citizen the opportunity to conduct themselves honorably and participate in the political process of their country.

As a result, it is against international law to use bribery to sway public officials or interfere with democratic processes.

The use of bribes to alter the local governmental body serves as evidence that the scenario demonstrates the principle of corruption.

Learn more about principle of corruption: https://brainly.com/question/14658668

#SPJ1

The samurai's role in Japanese society did not primarily involve helping peasants escape unfair tax systems or promoting pacifism and religious meditation.

Instead, their role revolved around supporting the daimyos and providing security, as well as occasionally supporting the emperor against ruthless daimyos. The samurai were a distinct social class in feudal Japan that emerged during the Heian period (794-1185). Initially, they served as warriors and fought on behalf of their respective daimyos, who were feudal lords.

The primary duty of the samurai was to protect their lords and their domains, engaging in battles and conflicts as necessary. They underwent rigorous training in martial arts, swordsmanship, and strategy, developing exceptional skills on the battlefield.

While their primary role was military, samurai also served administrative functions during periods of relative peace. They were involved in governance, overseeing land distribution, collecting taxes, and maintaining social order. Samurai acted as advisors to their daimyos, providing counsel on political matters and serving as administrators of their domains.

know more about samurai's here:

https://brainly.com/question/361705

#SPJ8

It led to a balance of free and slave states in Congress.

Stop saying you'll give brainliest if you don't.

Answer:what novel

Explanation:

The events that led to the second Seminole war were:

The second Seminole war was between the Black Indians that were regarded as the Seminoles and the US.

The US had wanted to force the people out of their lands into the creeks of the river Mississippi. The signing of the Indian removal act by President Andrew Jackson also helped to cause the crisis.

The determination to have the Indians removed by force was what prompted the Indian leader Osceola to fight against the US.

Read more on

https://brainly.com/question/3796339?referrer=searchResults

Answer:Concurrent powers refers to powers which are shared by both the federal government and state governments. This includes the power to tax, build roads, and create lower courts.

Explanation:good luck

Answer: They used religion and laws to bolster their legitimacy.

Explanation:

Approving international treaties is an exclusive power to the Senate.

The power that is exclusive to the Senate is approving international treaties.  Therefore, the correct option is B.

According to the United States Constitution, the Senate has the authority to ratify treaties negotiated by the President. The President can negotiate and sign treaties, but they require the approval of a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate for them to be ratified and become binding law.

This is one of the checks and balances designed to ensure that important international agreements receive careful scrutiny and consensus before being implemented.

Thus, the ideal selection is option B.

Learn more about Senate here:

https://brainly.com/question/29237789

#SPJ6

Answer:

1. The Mongol Empire

2. Siegfried Marcus, Alexander Winton, and Arthur Constantin Krebs.

Explanation:

1. The square mile is it covered some 9 million square miles and the region is Mongol empire, empire founded by Genghis Khan in 1206.

2. Siegfried Marcus 1864

Alexander Winton 1902

Arthur Constantin Krebs 1868

Answer:

Article II of the Constitution establishes the Executive branch of the federal government. It defines the office of President and Vice President, and an Electoral College to elect them.

George Washington's term as president of the United States began on April 30, 1789, with his inauguration, and it concluded on March 4, 1797.

The District of Columbia, along the Potomac River, is designated as the permanent location of the nation's capital by President Washington, who also signs the legislation into law. A bill directing the federal government to take on the states' obligations from the Revolutionary War is signed into law by President Washington.

The first President of the United States, George Washington, took his oath of office on April 30, 1789, while seated on the balcony of Federal Hall on Wall Street in New York.

Learn more about George Washington here:

https://brainly.com/question/14598321

#SPJ1

Answer:

b

Explanation:

got it right on edge 23

Answer:

I'd be glad to assist in explaining Andrew Johnson's impeachment. In order to give you a complete understanding, I will first give you a brief summary of the historical setting, then explain the legal justifications for impeachment, and finally go over the arguments in favor of and against the validity of the Johnson impeachment process.

After President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, Andrew Johnson became the 17th President of the United States, holding office from 1865 to 1869. Johnson served as president during the turbulent Reconstruction era, when the country was attempting to reconstruct the South and integrate the defeated Confederate states after the Civil War. Johnson frequently clashed with the Republican-controlled Congress because to his policies of deference to the Southern states.

Let's now talk about the legal foundation for impeachment. The President, Vice President, and other civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office upon impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors, according to Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution. As a result, the Constitution grants Congress the power to convict and impeach the President in these situations.

The House of Representatives voted to impeach Andrew Johnson in February 1868, which began the impeachment procedure. Johnson was accused of breaking the Tenure of Office Act in 11 of the House's articles of impeachment. This law, which Congress approved in 1867, mandated that the President get Senate consent before removing some officeholders. Johnson had fired Edwin M. Stanton, the secretary of war, without the approval of the Senate, which was a clear violation of the Tenure of Office Act and the basis for impeachment.

Let's look at the justifications for and against Johnson's impeachment now:

Johnson ultimately narrowly escaped conviction in the Senate by missing the necessary two-thirds majority for impeachment by just one vote. Scholars and legal professionals are still debating the constitutional ramifications and reasons for the impeachment trial, which continues to be a contentious episode in American history.

I hope that by explaining the impeachment of Andrew Johnson, its legal foundation, and the reasons against it, you can better understand it. Please don't hesitate to inquire if you have any further questions or need any clarification.

The efficiency gap measure of gerrymandering, which involves placing voters into electoral districts in a way that increases the wasted votes of one political faction and decreases the wasted votes of the other, is based on wasted votes.

By drawing electoral district lines to benefit certain political interests inside legislative bodies, a technique known as gerrymandering, districts are frequently created that have twisted, tangled boundaries rather than compact ones.  It is the process of redistricting legislative districts to suit the ruling political party.

Because the ruling party will do all it takes to increase the advantage of its rival in its stronger districts, gerrymandering has an unintended negative impact on congressional elections.

This is unjust because it gives some voters less sway than others, skews the vote in one direction, prolongs the tenure of the incumbent, and increases the likelihood that members of the incumbent's party will win office in subsequent elections.

To learn more about Gerrymandering refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/20524077

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Spanish government responded to the decline in the native population of their colonies in a variety of ways, including attempts to regulate the treatment of Indigenous peoples and efforts to import African slaves as a labor source.

One of the earliest responses was the encomienda system, which was a labor system that granted Spanish settlers the right to use Indigenous peoples for labor in exchange for their protection and religious instruction. However, the encomienda system often led to the exploitation and abuse of Indigenous peoples, and the Spanish government attempted to regulate it in the mid-16th century.

Another response was the creation of the New Laws of 1542, which were designed to protect Indigenous peoples from abuse and exploitation. The laws abolished the encomienda system, established the rights of Indigenous peoples to own land, and limited the use of Indigenous labor. However, the New Laws were unpopular with many Spanish settlers, who saw them as a threat to their economic interests.

As the native population continued to decline, the Spanish government began to import African slaves as a labor source. African slaves were brought to the Americas in large numbers from the late 16th century onwards, and their labor was used to support the growing colonial economies.

References:

Gibson, C. (1966). The Aztecs under Spanish rule: A history of the Indians of the Valley of Mexico, 1519-1810. Stanford University Press.

Lockhart, J. (1991). The men of Cajamarca: A social and biographical study of the first conquerors of Peru. University of Texas Press.

Mancall, P. C. (2009). Fatal journey: The final expedition of Henry Hudson. Basic Books.

Explanation:

In ancient societies, the group of people who often held the most wealth and had the most money varied depending on the specific civilization and time period. However, generally speaking, option D, traders and merchants, had the potential to accumulate significant wealth in many ancient societies.

Traders and merchants were involved in long-distance trade, facilitating the exchange of goods and resources between different regions. They often controlled valuable commodities, established trade networks, and engaged in lucrative business transactions. The ability to access and control valuable resources and commodities, as well as the profits generated from trade, contributed to their wealth accumulation.

It's important to note that there were other factors that influenced wealth distribution in ancient societies. For example, in some civilizations, such as ancient Egypt, option B, priests and temple workers, held considerable wealth and influence due to their roles in religious institutions and their control over temple resources and land.

Overall, the distribution of wealth in ancient societies was complex and multifaceted, and it varied depending on factors such as the economic system, social structure, and cultural values of each civilization.

Answer:

Mexico was first populated more than 13000 years ago before the Spanish conquered and colonized the country in the 16th century.

The primary concern of Muslims immediately upon the death of Prophet Muhammad was the issue of succession, that is, who would succeed the Prophet as the leader of the Muslim community (Ummah) and the head of the Islamic state.

This issue was of great importance because the Prophet played a central role in the establishment and consolidation of the Muslim community and his leadership was seen as essential to its success and survival.

The controversy over succession led to a split in the Muslim community between those who believed that the Prophet's cousin and son-in-law, Ali ibn Abi Talib, should succeed him, and those who believed that Abu Bakr, one of the Prophet's closest companions, should be the leader.

The former group, who became known as the Shi'a (or Shia), believed that the leadership of the Ummah should remain within the Prophet's family, while the latter group, who became known as the Sunni, believed that leadership should be based on merit and the consensus of the community.

Read more about Mohammad

brainly.com/question/1214743

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. Iraq was forced to accept the UN’s cease-fire terms.

Explanation:

When the US attacked Iraq in 1991, Iraq agreed to the UN's terms for a cease-fire. When Iraq attacked Kuwait, the US and its allies also went to war. The attack was meant to get rid of Iraqi troops and set Kuwait free. After weeks of bombings and strikes on the ground, Iraq's troops gave up.

This ended the fighting. Iraq had to leave Kuwait and accept to follow UN rules as part of the cease-fire. Some of these rules were that Iraq had to get rid of its weapons that could kill a lot of people, set up a demilitarized zone along the border with Kuwait, and pay Kuwait money. In short, the US attack on Iraq in 1991 led to Iraq agreeing to the UN's request for a cease-fire, which freed Kuwait and got rid of Iraqi troops.

Due to the fact that the US-led attack preserved international law and granted Kuwait its freedom, the rest of the world considered it a success. However, after the Gulf War, Iraq was destroyed and had to deal with economic bans and political chaos, which would have long-term effects on the area.

In 1991, UN alliance troops fought against Iraqi forces at: https://brainly.com/questions/12631362

Answer:

1. C 2. A 3. B

Explanation:

The debt suffered by the British crown was a major issue after the french and indian war. In direct result of this the British increased taxes on their colonies in America, putting an end to the policy of salutary neglect in the colonies. Which in turn causes the American revolution

Answer:

2;4

Explanation:

Answer:

b, Germany had to take responsibility for starting the war.

c,Germany had to take responsibility for starting the war.

e,Germany had to pay $33 billion in reparations.

Explanation:

The Reaganomics was the concept from the 1980s that began to be questioned as a possible cause of the economic downturn in the 1990s.

The concept is best defined as the economic policies put forward by Ronald Reagan during his presidency in the 1980s to fight a long period of slow economic growth, high unemployment, and high inflation that occurred under Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.

The concept of Reaganomics was built upon four key economics concepts which are:

However, it was most associated as the possible cause of the economic downturn in the 1990s after the implementation in the 1980s.

Read more about Reaganomics

brainly.com/question/12814840

#SPJ1

Answer:

A The guy in the front of the line is Brezhnev. Remeber the guy our teachers talked about in CC with the wooly eyebrows

B. The are burying the USA

C. you can see Lenin and Kruchev are wrapped by the spectacle of their mortal enemy dying.

D. The soviets have overcome their adversary. They've destroyed the other world superpower

E. I think the USSR really didn't fall. They only went further underground. Look at what Putin is currently doing.

Explanation: