How do we obtain data about the properties of exoplanets and objects in our solar system?

Answer:

Badminton game played with one player per side is true and Badminton game played with two players per side is also true.

Explanation:

Answer:

The key is that solids hold their shape and they don't flow like a liquid. A rock will always look like a rock unless something happens to it.

Solids can hold their shape because their molecules are tightly packed together.

Explanation:

Yes; it is a solid

According to the statement, The magnetic field 10.0 cm from their midpoint, in their plane is 0.028.

The region around a magnet where the effects of magnetism are perceived is known as the magnetic field. To explain how the force of magnetism is distributed in the area around and inside something magnetic in nature, we use a magnetic field as a tool.

The magnetic field produced by these two current-carrying wires is simply the sum of the magnetic fields produced b each individually. Sin ce these current are antiparallel, their magnetic field partially cancel so that

Bnet = uI/2π ( 1/r1- 1/r2) = [(4π × 10^-7 m/A)(25.0 A)]/2π

=(1/0.10m - 0.0014m) - (1/0.10 + 0.0014m)

=1.4× 10^-6

in comparison, the earth's magnetic field is 0.5 × 10^-4 T so

Bnet/Bearth = 1.4× 10^-6 T/0.5 × 10^-4 T = 0.028

To know more about magnetic field visit :

https://brainly.com/question/3160109

#SPJ1

The complete question is -

A long pair of insulated wires serves to conduct 25.0A of dc current to and from an instrument.

if the wires are of negligible diameter but are 2.8 mm apart, what is the magnetic field 10.0 cm from their midpoint, in their plane

An external force exceeding the maximum static friction between the object and the surface is the likely reason for the object to start moving. This force could be from various sources.

The most likely reason the object begins to move is that a force is acting on it, overcoming the static friction between the object and the surface.

Static friction is the force that keeps the object at rest, but once the force acting on the object exceeds the maximum static friction, the object starts to move.

The force could come from various sources, such as an external push or pull, the force of gravity if the surface is inclined, or the force of air resistance if the object is moving through the air.

The coefficient of static friction between the object and the surface is also an important factor in determining the maximum static friction that can be exerted before the object starts to move.

To know more about friction , refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/24186853#

#SPJ11

To determine the separation distance between the charges, we can use Coulomb's Law, which states that the force between two charged objects is proportional to the product of their charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The formula for Coulomb's Law is:

F = k * (|q1| * |q2|) / r^2

Where:

F is the force between the charges,

k is the electrostatic constant (k ≈ 9 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2),

|q1| and |q2| are the magnitudes of the charges,

r is the separation distance between the charges.

Given:

|q1| = 5.0 x 10^-6 C,

|q2| = 6.0 x 10^-6 C,

F = -0.72 N.

Rearranging the formula, we can solve for the separation distance (r):

r = √(k * (|q1| * |q2|) / F)

to know more about square

https://brainly.in/question/16347938

#spj11

Answer:

On Bode's advice, Herschel named his newly discovered planet after: the Greek god Uranus.

Explanation:

Herschel named his newly discovered planet Uranus on Bode's advice for a couple of reasons:

Mythological Naming Convention: During that time, it was a common practice to name celestial objects after mythological figures, particularly gods from Greek and Roman mythology. Bode suggested following this convention and recommended that Herschel choose a name from Greek mythology for the newly discovered planet.

Connection to the Sky: Uranus was chosen as the name for the planet because it was the name of the Greek god of the sky. Given that Herschel had discovered a celestial object in the sky, naming it after the god associated with the sky seemed fitting.

By naming the planet Uranus, Herschel paid homage to the mythological tradition of naming celestial bodies while also establishing a connection between his discovery and the vastness of the sky.

Hope this helps!

Explanation:

For 787 dreamliner airplane,

Mass, \(m_1=2450\ kg\)

Height, \(h_1=11500\ m\)

Potential energy of 787 dreamliner airplane is given by :

\(E_1=m_1gh_1\\\\E_1=2450\times 9.8\times 11500\\\\E_1=2.76\times 10^8\ J\)

For a boeing 747,

Mass, \(m_2=3150\ kg\)

Height, \(h_2=9000 \ m\)

:

Potential energy of a boeing 747 airplane is given by

\(E_2=m_2gh_2\\\\E_2=3150\times 9.8\times 9000\\\\E_2=2.77\times 10^8\ J\)

So, the potential energy of a boeing 747 airplane is more than the 787 dreamliner airplane.

Answer:

20 N/m

Explanation:

From the question,

The ball-point pen obays hook's law.

From hook's law,

F = ke............................ Equation 1

Where F = Force, k = spring constant, e = compression.

Make k the subject of the equation

k = F/e........................ Equation 2

Given: F = 0.1 N, e = 0.005 m.

Substitute these values into equation 2

k = 0.1/0.005

k = 20 N/m.

Hence the spring constant of the tiny spring is 20 N/m

I'm sorry, but you have not provided the options for the different bins to sort the astronomical measurements into. Please provide the full question with all the necessary information so I can assist you better.
To categorize each astronomical measurement based on the type of telescope used, it's important to understand the two main types of telescopes: refracting telescopes and reflecting telescopes. Refracting telescopes use lenses to bend light while reflecting telescopes use mirrors to reflect light.

1. Refracting Telescope:
- Measurements requiring high contrast, such as observing planets or the Moon
- Measurements of bright objects, where light-gathering power is less important

2. Reflecting Telescope:
- Measurements that require large light-gathering power, such as observing faint galaxies or nebulae
- Measurements needing high resolution, like imaging fine details on distant celestial objects

Remember to consider the specific requirements of each measurement when determining the appropriate telescope type. Refracting telescopes are often used for planetary observations while reflecting telescopes are more suitable for deep-sky objects.

Learn more about the Telescope here:- brainly.in/question/12806473

#SPJ11

Answer:

The second fish, X2, is moving faster than the first fish, X1

Explanation:

The given parameters for the equation of motion of the fishes are;

X1 = -6.4 m + (-1.2 m/s)×t

X2 = 1.3 m + (-2.7 m/s)×t

The given equation are straight line equations in the slope and intercept form, where the slope is the speed and in m/s and the intercept is the starting point of swimming of the fishes

For the first fish, the intercept = -6.4 m, the slope = the  speed = -1.2 m/s

For the second fish, the intercept = 1.3 m, the slope = the  speed = -2.7 m/s

Whereby the fishes are swimming in the opposite direction of the measurement of length, we have;

The magnitude of the speed of the second fish \(\left | -2.7 \ m/s \right | = 2.7 \ m/s\), is larger than the magnitude of the speed of the first fish \(\left | -1.2 \ m/s \right | = 1.2 \ m/s\)

Therefore, the second fish, X2, is moving faster than the first fish, X1.

Answer:

If we’re talking about objects on the Earth, the gravitational potential energy is given by:

Explanation:

PEg=mgh

so the energy is proportional to the mass ( m ), but also to the strength of the gravitational field ( g ), and the height ( h ) to which the mass is lifted.

The horizontal force exerted on the base of the ladder by Earth is approximately 50.9 N.

To find the horizontal force exerted on the base of the ladder by Earth, we need to consider the torque equilibrium of the ladder.

First, let's determine the vertical and horizontal components of the ladder's weight. The weight of the ladder is given as 591.0 N. The vertical component is given by:

Vertical Component = Weight of Ladder × sin(61.0°)

                                  = 591.0 N × sin(61.0°)

                                  ≈ 505.0 N

The horizontal component of the ladder's weight is given by:

Horizontal Component = Weight of Ladder × cos(61.0°)

                                      = 591.0 N × cos(61.0°)

                                      ≈ 299.7 N

Next, we need to consider the weight of the firefighter. The weight of the firefighter is given as 898.0 N. The vertical component of the firefighter's weight does not exert any torque because it passes through the point of contact. Therefore, we only need to consider the horizontal component of the firefighter's weight, which is:

Horizontal Component of Firefighter's Weight = Weight of Firefighter × cos(61.0°)

                                                                             = 898.0 N × cos(61.0°)

                                                                             ≈ 453.7 N

Now, let's consider the torque equilibrium. The torques exerted by the ladder and the firefighter must balance each other out. The torque exerted by the ladder is given by the product of the vertical component of the ladder's weight and its distance from the bottom:

Torque by Ladder = Vertical Component of Ladder's Weight × Distance from Bottom

                              = 505.0 N × 3.91 m

                              ≈ 1976.6 N·m

The torque exerted by the firefighter is given by the product of the horizontal component of the firefighter's weight and its distance from the bottom:

Torque by Firefighter = Horizontal Component of Firefighter's Weight × Distance from Bottom

                    = 453.7 N × 3.91 m

                    ≈ 1775.7 N·m

Since the ladder is in equilibrium, the torques exerted by the ladder and the firefighter must balance each other out:

Torque by Ladder = Torque by Firefighter

To maintain equilibrium, the horizontal force exerted on the base of the ladder by Earth must balance out the torques. Therefore, the horizontal force exerted on the base of the ladder by Earth is:

Horizontal Force = (Torque by Ladder - Torque by Firefighter) / Distance from Bottom

               = (1976.6 N·m - 1775.7 N·m) / 3.91 m

               ≈ 50.9 N

Therefore, the horizontal force exerted on the base of the ladder by Earth is approximately 50.9 N.

Learn more about Force https://brainly.com/question/12979825

#SPJ11

Based on the given information, the temperature at your station in Houston is likely to decrease in the next 2 hours due to the constant temperature advection and is estimated to be 63.04ºF (16.8ºC).

Given the wind speed of 10 m/s from the west-northwest, we can use the concept of wind advection to adjust the temperature gradient based on the speed and direction of the wind.

First, we need to convert the wind speed from meters per second to kilometers per hour, as the temperature gradient is typically expressed in degrees per kilometer.

10 m/s is equivalent to 36 kilometers per hour (10 m/s * 3.6 km/h).

Next, we can adjust the temperature gradient based on the wind speed. The temperature change due to advection is typically estimated using a rule of thumb, which suggests that for each 10 kilometers per hour of wind speed, the temperature change is approximately 1 degree Celsius (or 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) over a distance of 100 kilometers.

In this case, with a wind speed of 36 kilometers per hour, the adjusted temperature change due to advection would be approximately 3.6 degrees Celsius (or 6.48 degrees Fahrenheit) over a distance of 100 kilometers.

Now, let's calculate the temperature change at your station in Houston after 2 hours using the adjusted temperature gradient.

Temperature change = Adjusted temperature gradient × Distance × Time

Temperature change = 3.6°C/200 km * 200 km * 2 hours

Calculating the result, the temperature at your station in Houston is estimated to decrease by 7.2 degrees Celsius (or 12.96 degrees Fahrenheit) after 2 hours.

To find the final temperature at your station, subtract this temperature change from the initial temperature of 76ºF (24ºC):

Final temperature = Initial temperature - Temperature change

Final temperature = 76ºF (24ºC) - 12.96ºF (7.2ºC)

The estimated final temperature at your station in Houston after 2 hours is approximately 63.04ºF (16.8ºC).

Learn more about advection here:

https://brainly.com/question/14814798

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

B

Answer:

white

Explanation:

This experiment causes lines of different colors because the constructive interference depends on the wavelength, so for different wavelength, the position of the maximum will be different.

Now, in diffraction fo a single slit we always have a central maximum (for all the colors)

This means that after the diffraction, we will have that all the colors have a maximum in the center, which will produce white light again, then the color of the central image is white

Complete option to the question:

A. The asthenosphere is broken up into large continental- and ocean-sized plates.

B. Convection currents within the asthenosphere push magma upward to create new crust.

C. Heat from deep within Earth is thought to keep the asthenosphere malleable.

D. The asthenosphere is the repository for parts of the lithosphere that are dragged downward in subduction zones.

Answer: The correct option is A (The asthenosphere is broken up into large continental- and ocean-sized plates.)

Explanation:

Among the components that makes up the earth crust are the lithosphere and the asthenosphere.

The LITHOSPHERE is the outer layer of the earth structure which consists of the upper part of the mantle and the crust.

The ASTHENOSPHERE is a part of the upper mantle just below the lithosphere that is involved in plate tectonic movement and isostatic adjustments. It is denser and weaker layer of the upper mantle which permits the movement of tectonic plates in the lithosphere.

The asthenosphere is the repository for parts of the lithosphere that are dragged downward in subduction zones.Heat from deep within Earth is thought to keep the asthenosphere malleable. And the convection currents within the asthenosphere push magma upward to create new crust. But it is not broken up into large continental- and ocean-sized plates.

Okay, let's think this through step-by-step:

* The rate of energy transfer is 50 J/s

* We need to calculate the energy transferred in 4 seconds

* So we would calculate:

Energy in 4 seconds = Rate x Time

= 50 J/s x 4 s

= 200 J

So the heat energy produced within 4 seconds with an energy transfer rate of 50 J/s is 200 J.

Let me know if you have any other questions!

Answer:

???????????????????????????????????????

Explanation:

Answer:

q r s t u v w x y z

Explanation:

If the colours at the base of the leaves appear distortion, there may be a number of causes including poor lighting, the age of the leaves, a lack of nutrients, a disease or pest infestation, or even a genetic mutation in the plant.

Dispersion is the distribution of white light throughout its entire spectrum of wavelengths. The dispersion of sunlight into a continuous range of colours causes rainbows, which are created by a combination of refraction and reflection.

The prism separates the white light into its individual colors, which are red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet.

To know more about prism visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/10462991

#SPJ1

Since the resistors are in series, the equivalent resistance is the sum of the resistances:

Now, to find the current, let's divide the voltage by the total resistance:

The current through each resistor is the same because they are in series: 1.5 A.

To find the most powerful resistor, let's analyze the formula for the power in a resistor:

We can see that the greater the resistance, the greater the power, therefore the most powerful resistor is the 30 ohms resistor.

The resulting average force on the helicopter is  457,580.8 N.

The resulting average force on the helicopter is calculated by applying Newton's second law of motion as follows;

Mathematically, the formula for Newton's second law of motion is given as;

F = ma

where;

F = ( mv / t )

where;

The resulting average force on the helicopter is calculated as follows;

F = ( 3980 x 576 ) / ( 5.01 )

F = 457,580.8 N

Thus, the resulting average force on the helicopter is a function of the mass of the helicopter, muzzle speed of the cannon and the time interval in which the shell was fired.

Learn more about average force here: https://brainly.com/question/16200276

#SPJ1

Main answer-

PE=mgh

KE=E-PE

V = (2*g*h)^½

at point A

PE = 10*9.8*50=4900 J

KE = 0 J  ( because the velocity of the body is 0)

V=0

at point B

PE = 10*9.8*35=3430 J

KE = 4900-3430=1470 J

V= ( 2*9.8*15)^ ½

V=17.14 m/s

at point C

PE= 10*9.8*25=2450 J

KE=4900-2450=2450 J

V= (2*9.8*25)^ ½

V=22.135 m/s

at point D

PE=10*9.8*0=0 J

KE=4900-0=4900 J

V=(2*9.8*50)^ ½

V=31.30 m/s

to learn more about potential energy and kinetic energy of a falling body link

https://brainly.in/question/1359662

#SPJ1

The velocity of the ball at the top of the arc before it starts back down is 0 m/s.

The given parameters;

initial velocity of the ball, u = 25 m/s

The velocity of a projectile decreases as the projectile moves upwards and eventually becomes zero (0) when the projectile reaches maximum height. The velocity also increases as the begins to descend and it will become maximum before the object hits the ground.

The final velocity of the projectile is calculated as;

\(v_f = v_0 -gt\)

where;

At maximum height;

\(v_f = 0\)

Thus, we can conclude that the velocity of the ball at the top of the arc before it starts back down is 0 m/s.

Learn more here:https://brainly.com/question/25254800

Answer:

The equation for wave speed can be used to calculate the speed of a wave when both wavelength and wave frequency are known. Consider an ocean wave with a wavelength of 3 meters and a frequency of 1 hertz. The speed of the wave is: Speed = 3 m x 1 wave/s = 3 m/s.

Explanation:

The potential difference across the source will be 7.158 V.Ohm's law principle is applied.

Ohm's law claims that the voltage across a conductor is directly proportional to the current flowing through it.

An emf source is connected in parallel to the equivalent resistance of a 15.00 resistor and a 7.00 resistor is:

\(\rm \frac{1}{R_{eq}} =\frac{1}{R_1} +\frac{1}{R_2} \\\\ \rm \frac{1}{R_{eq}} =\frac{1}{15} +\frac{1}{7} \\\\ R_{eq} =4.77281 \ ohm\)

This current-voltage connection may be expressed mathematically as, The Equation of ohm's Law

\(\rm E_{eq}=I_{eq}R{eq}\\\\ \rm E_{eq}= 1.50 \ A \times 4.772 \ ohm \\\\ E_{eq}= 7.158 \ V\)

Hence, the potential difference across the source will be 7.158 V.

To learn more the ohm's law refer to the link;

https://brainly.com/question/796939

#SPJ1

A body of a certain mass could become weightless in the following two conditions:

1. In microgravity

2. In neutral buoyancy

Cheers,

qxxi

Answer:

C

Explanation:

During investigations a scientist needs to observe, investigate, collect data and put together the information they collect.

Answer:

Explanation:

Redshift of Galaxies. The redshift of distant galaxies means that the Universe is probably expanding. ...

Microwave Background. Very early in its history, the whole Universe was very hot. ...

Mixture of Elements. As the Universe expanded and cooled down, some of the elements that we see today were created. ...

Looking back in time.

The earliest and most direct observational evidence of the validity of the theory are the expansion of the universe according to Hubble's law (as indicated by the redshifts of galaxies), discovery and measurement of the cosmic microwave background and the relative abundances of light elements produced by Big Bang ...

The contradictions between Big Bang theory predictions and observations are not at all limited to those that have been widely dubbed a “Crisis in Cosmology”.  Despite the continuing popularity of the theory, essentially every prediction of the Big Bang theory has been increasingly contradicted by better and better data, as shown by many teams of researchers. The observations are, on the other hand, consistent with a non-expanding universe with no Big Bang. The real crisis in cosmology is that the Big Bang never happened.

Key contradicted predictions (detailed descriptions below):

1) Light elements: Lithium and Helium

Prediction: Any superhot explosion throughout the universe, like the Big Bang, would have generated a certain small amount of the light element lithium and a large amount of helium.

Observation: Yet as astronomers have observed older and older stars, the amount of lithium observed has gotten less and less, and, in the oldest stars is less than one tenth of the predicted level. The oldest stars near to us have less than half the amount of helium predicted. However, well-understood fusion processes in stars and reactions initiated by cosmic rays have accurately predicted the correct amounts of these and other light elements.

2) Antimatter-matter annihilation

Prediction: Since the intense radiation of the Big Bang would produce matter and antimatter in equal amounts, mutual annulation of particle-antiparticle pairs would reduce the surviving matter density to around    10 -17 protons/cm3.

Observation: the matter density in the universe is observed to be at least 10 -7 ions /cm3 more than 10 billion times higher than the Big Bang prediction.

Big Bang fix to prediction: To try to fix this well-known vast gap, Big Bang theorists have proposed some unknown asymmetry between matter and antimatter which would lead to more production of matter. This has never been observed in laboratory experiments. A consequence of this predicted imbalance is the decays of the proton, initially predicted to decay with a lifetime of 1030 years. Large scale experiments have contradicted this prediction was well, with no evidence of decay at all.

3) Surface-Brightness

Prediction: In any expanding universe, an optical illusion makes objects at high redshift appear larger and dimmer, so their surface brightness—the ratio of apparent brightness to apparent area—declines sharply with redshift.

Observation: Based on observations of thousands of galaxies, surface brightness is completely constant with distance, as expected in a universe that is NOT expanding.

Big Bang fix to Prediction: After observations showed that the surface brightness dimming did not occur, Big Bang theorists hypothesized that galaxies were much smaller in the distant past and have grown greatly. But observations have contradicted this fix as well, showing that there have not been enough galaxy mergers for the growth rates needed. In addition, the ultra-small galaxies hypothesized would have to have more mass in stars than total mass, an obvious impossibility.

4) Too Large Structures

Prediction: In the Big Bang theory, the universe is supposed to start off completely smooth and homogenous. Structure starts small and grows over time

Observation: As telescopes have peered farther into space, huger and huger structures of galaxies have been discovered, which are too large to have been formed in the time since the Big Bang.

This research tests a striking 1930s prediction of Big Bang hypothesis that objects at great distances should actually appear larger, not smaller. According to the hypothesis, this is because of an optical illusion due to the galaxies having been much closer when their light was emitted.

This prediction was repeated in the literature through the 1980s but in the 1990s, the Hubble Space Telescope did not confirm the prediction. Hubble’s images instead showed that the most distant galaxies do in fact look the smallest. A group of researchers then formulated an additional hypothesis that galaxies actually grow in size with time.      

Many researchers, including Dr. Scarpa, have demonstrated evidence that a small modification of gravitational forces, termed MOND, could also explain the data.  

If an object is put into motion in space, it will continue to move in a straight line with a constant speed unless acted upon by an external force. This is due to the absence of air resistance and other forces that typically slow down objects on Earth.

Additionally, the object's motion will be affected by the gravitational forces of nearby celestial bodies, which can cause it to accelerate or change direction.

When an object is put into motion in space, it will continue to move in a straight line at a constant velocity due to the lack of external forces acting upon it. This phenomenon is explained by Newton's first law of motion, also known as the law of inertia. In space, there is no air resistance or friction, which means there are no external forces to slow down the object. Therefore, the object will maintain its constant velocity unless acted upon by another force, such as gravity from a nearby celestial body.

To know more about Motion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22810476

#SPJ11