How did the supreme court majority argue that ""separate but equal"" facilities were legal? check all that apply.

Answer:

6

Explanation:

Answer:

6 wives

Explanation:

Catherine of Aragon. Catherine is best known today for her role in sparking the Reformation; the annulment of her marriage led to Henry being excommunicated from the Catholic Church. ...

Anne Boleyn. ...

Jane Seymour. ...

Anne of Cleves. ...

Catherine Howard. ...

Catherine Parr.

Answer:

the war was no longer just about preserving the union , it was about freeing the slaves

Answer:

Gasoline

Explanation:

Driving remained important to Texans during the war, making gasoline rationing a difficult sacrifice.

(Late but why not.)

Answer: I think it’s to make kids want to celebrate Thanksgiving and to want to learn more. Kids would rather hear about Pilgrims and Native Americans getting along compared to shameful things that actually happened too.

The sacrificial princess and the king of beasts are characters commonly found in fantasy literature and folklore.

The sacrificial princess is typically portrayed as a young woman chosen by her community to be offered as a sacrifice to appease a powerful and dangerous creature, often referred to as the king of beasts. The king of beasts is usually depicted as a fearsome and powerful creature, such as a dragon or a mythical beast, who demands the sacrifice to maintain peace and harmony in the land. In many stories, the sacrificial princess and the king of beasts form a complex relationship. Sometimes, the princess may develop empathy and understanding towards the creature, leading to a shift in the dynamics between them. In other instances, the princess may display bravery and resourcefulness in her attempts to escape or overcome the king of beasts. Overall, the sacrificial princess and the king of beasts characters serve as symbolic representations of sacrifice, courage, and the power of empathy. Their narratives often explore themes of love, loyalty, and the ability to see beyond appearances.

To know more about escape visit:

brainly.com/question/31213441

#SPJ11

Answer:

Songhai established a democratic form of government, while Benin did not. Benin grew wealthy through the gold-salt trade, while Songhai grew wealthy through the silk trade.

I think this is the Answer, anyways hope this helps you. :)

Answer:

Songhai's leaders converted to Islam, while Benin's leaders maintained their native religion. Known as Vodan or Voodoo is how the Kingdom of Benin differ from the Kingdom of Songhai during the postclassical era

Explanation:

Answer:Louis

Explanation:

In ancient Egypt, the objection to a diplomatic marriage with the Babylonian king was due to concerns over religious and cultural differences.

Egypt had strict religious practices, and marrying a foreign king who worshiped different gods was seen as a potential threat to their beliefs and traditions. To overcome this objection, the Babylonian king suggested a ruse or deception.

He proposed that he would convert to the Egyptian religion and adopt their customs, thereby eliminating the religious and cultural conflict. By doing so, he aimed to present himself as compatible with Egyptian society and gain their acceptance for diplomatic marriage.

Learn more about Babylonian king:

https://brainly.com/question/28488828

#SPJ4

For generations, Jews across the globe have embraced a common, master narrative of Jewish migration in modern times that traces its origins to widespread acts of anti-Jewish violence, often referred to as pogroms, that propelled millions of Jews from the dark hinterlands of Eastern Europe into the warm, supportive embrace of their current, “Western” societies, ranging from the United States to Israel to Australia. In North America, Israel, and other new (or at the very least renewed) Jewish communities, definitive bastions of Jewish memory, society, and culture – like The National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia and Beit Hatfutsot: The Museum of the Jewish People on Tel Aviv University's campus – tell and retell a widely-accepted narrative of Jewish migration in which Jews who flee violence and oppression in Eastern Europe are rescued, if not saved, by the very act of migration. In these, and innumerable other cases, Jewish migration in the modern era is repeatedly presented as a willful act of secular self-salvation. Mirroring and at times even bolstering the story of the biblical Exodus from ancient Egypt, these modern, secular versions of traditional Jewish accounts of slavery, flight, and redemption repeatedly serve as fundamental components of contemporary Jewish society, culture, and self.

In response to the prevailing influence of these and related myths of Jewish crisis, flight, and rescue, scholars as definitive as Salo Baron have long argued that the predominance of the so-called lachrymose conception of Jewish history ultimately warps popular and academic conceptions of both the Jewish past and present. As Baron noted in a retrospective essay first published in 1963: “[ … ] an overemphasis on Jewish sufferings distorted the total picture of the Jewish historic evolution and, at the same time, badly served a generation which had become impatient with the nightmare of endless persecutions and massacres.”1 Despite these and related attempts to revise the lachrymose conception of Jewish history as well as the large-scale social, political, and economic changes that have changed the very face of Jewish society over the past century and a half, the traditional historical paradigm of persecution, flight, and refuge continues to shape popular and even scholarly accounts of Jewish migration and history in modern times.2 The continued salience of this master narrative touches upon several key methodological questions in the study of Jewish migration and history. The first issue that the prominent place of anti-Jewish persecution and violence raises is the problematic, long-debated place of antisemitism as both a defining characteristic and driving force in the long course of Jewish history.3 A second issue related to the prominent place of anti-Jewish violence in popular and academic interpretations of Jewish history, in particular, and of European history, in general, is a parallel tendency to view the vast terrain of Eastern Europe as an area pre-destined to, if not defined by, inter-ethnic tensions, hatred, and violence.4 Lastly, the persecution, flight, and rescue narrative of Jewish migration and history very often ends up bolstering triumphalist views of the Jewish present, whether they be embraced and touted in New York, Tel Aviv, or Toronto.

Protected same-sex relationships.

The court case Lawrence v. Texas overturned Texas law that punished same-sex relationships.

Texas Law

Prior to this court case, Texas has laws that criminalized consensual same-sex relationships, even in private. These laws are often referred to as "sodomy" laws. Two men Lawrence and Garner were arrested and charged with a misdemeanor under these laws.

Court Case

Lawrence appealed the charge and won. Then Texas appealed, and eventually, the case made it to United States Supreme Court. In a 6-3 decision, all Sodomy laws in Texas were deemed unconstitutional under the 14th amendment. This same ruling resulted in 13 other states removing all sodomy laws and made same-sex relationships legal in every US state.

Answer: Former VPotUS

Explanation: Charles Dawes is the former vice president of the United States of America. He served under former president Calvin Coolidge from 1925-1929

Aretha Franklin, commonly known as "The Queen of Soul," was an American singer-songwriter, pianist, and actress. She was known for her powerful and soulful voice that captivated audiences for decades, earning her countless accolades, including numerous Grammy Awards.

One of her most significant achievements was being the first woman to be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Her music has left a lasting impact on the world, and she will always be remembered as one of the greatest singers of all time. Now coming to your question,What was Aretha Franklin’s first no. 1 hit on the Billboard charts?Aretha Franklin's first no. 1 hit on the Billboard charts was "Respect," which was released in 1967.

It quickly became an anthem for women's rights and the civil rights movement. The song was written by Otis Redding but became more associated with Aretha Franklin, who made it her signature song. The song is still regarded as one of the greatest songs of all time and has been covered by many other artists, including Kelly Clarkson, Diana Ross, and Beyonce. The song's message of self-respect and empowerment still resonates with listeners today, making it an enduring classic. In conclusion, Aretha Franklin's first no. 1 hit on the Billboard charts was "Respect," which has become an iconic song and an anthem for women's rights and civil rights.

To know more about empowerment visit:

brainly.com/question/32221977

#SPJ11

Answer:

a s  s s s

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is C) Religious Conflict

Answer: Pre-Columbian refers to the history and culture of North and South America before the arrival of Christopher Columbus.

From 1975 to 2015, the nation's crash fatality rate has decreased by roughly 58%. This significant decrease can be attributed to several factors and efforts aimed at improving road safety.

One major factor contributing to the decline in crash fatalities is the implementation of stricter traffic laws and regulations. Over the years, there has been an increased focus on enforcing seatbelt usage, impaired driving laws, and speed limits.

Advancements in vehicle safety technology have also contributed to the decline in crash fatalities. The introduction of safety features such as airbags, antilock braking systems (ABS), electronic stability control (ESC), and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) has greatly improved the crashworthiness of vehicles and enhanced driver safety.

Public awareness campaigns and educational initiatives have played a significant role in promoting safe driving practices. Organizations and government agencies have worked tirelessly to raise awareness about the importance of seatbelt usage, responsible alcohol consumption, and the dangers of distracted driving.

Investments in infrastructure and road design have also contributed to the reduction in crash fatalities. Improvements such as better road signage, lighting, and intersection design have enhanced visibility and reduced the likelihood of accidents.

In conclusion, the significant decrease in the nation's crash fatality rate from 1975 to 2015 can be attributed to a combination of factors including stricter traffic laws, advancements in vehicle safety technology, public awareness campaigns, and improvements in infrastructure and road design. These collective efforts have contributed to a safer road environment and saved countless lives over the years.

for more questions on fatality

https://brainly.com/question/30150233

#SPJ8

Answer:

Trade with Europe flourished.  

Explanation:

Many consider the Mongols as violent barbarians. While they were, they were also rich violent barbarians. Under Mongol rule, the silk road flourished with trade.

The soldiers who opened fire on Fort Summer would be treated as traitors, the paper claims. Fort Sumter was legally South Carolina's property, and the Confederate government had exercised much "forbearance" to achieve a fair agreement with the federal government.

The Lincoln government thwarted these plans by dispatching "a hostile navy" to Sumter. This attack is referred as the battle of fort summer.

Two days or less later, the fort was abandoned. There was no fatality. The Civil War, the bloodiest struggle in American history, began with this battle.

The Lincoln government did not fight because it supported slavery; Lincoln chose to do so rather than allow the Southern states to secede. Instead, he believed it was his sacred responsibility as President of the United States to do whatever it took him to keep the Union intact.

To learn more about government here

brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ4

Answer and Explanation:

The 20th century promoted several scientific innovations that were very important for human progress, in addition to representing the basis for discoveries that would be made in the coming years, making science even more innovative.

First, we can say that the 20th century was essential for the treatment of infections, since it was at that time that antibiotics were discovered, being one of the most important medicines in the world. Airplanes and the Internet are also scientific advances of that time and have become two essential elements in modern life.

Nevertheless, science has stimulated advances in communication, entertainment and even food. This all shows how important the 20th century was to establish the benefits and facilities that we currently have.

Answer:

Steel rails linked the farms and the mills. The railroads provided efficient, relatively cheap transportation that made both farming and milling profitable. They also carried the foodstuffs and other products that the men and women living on the single-crop bonanza farms needed to live.

Railroads had a significant impact on the lives of farmers in the Great Plains in several ways. One of the main ways railroads affected farmers in the Great Plains was by providing them with access to new markets for their crops.

Prior to the railroads, farmers in the Great Plains were isolated from major population centers and had limited options for selling their produce. With the arrival of railroads, farmers could transport their crops to distant markets, which helped to increase their profits and improve their economic situation.

However, railroads also had a negative impact on farmers in the Great Plains. One of the ways railroads took advantage of farmers was through the use of discriminatory pricing practices. This means that the railroads charged farmers higher prices for shipping their crops than they charged larger commercial customers, which made it more difficult for farmers to compete in the market.

Railroads were often owned by wealthy industrialists, who used their political influence to pass laws that favored their own interests over those of the farmers.while railroads provided farmers in the Great Plains with access to new markets and increased their profits, they also had negative impacts through discriminatory pricing and political influence.

To learn more about Railroad impact on farmers:

https://brainly.com/question/6637708

https://brainly.com/question/16891536

The correct question is:

How did railroads affect the lives of farmers in the Great Plains?

Answer;

I think it’s

1 box 2 box

C D A B

Explanation:

Answer:

Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

The Answer to the first one is:  A score is another way of saying 20, so Lincoln was referring to 1776, which was 87 years before 1863. Lincoln was declaring that the United States would continue to fight to preserve the nation that was created by the Founding Fathers who wrote the Declaration of Independence in 1776

 The Answer to the second one is: That is the idea Lincoln refers to in this section of the speech: The Civil War was testing whether the United States, which was founded on liberty and equality, could survive.

The Answer to thrid one is:  Keep in mind that, in 1776, the United States was a new kind of country with a different kind of political philosophy. Its formation was known as "the Great Experiment" because it ventured into new ground, and no one knew if such a government could survive. That is the idea Lincoln refers to in this section of the speech: The Civil War was testing whether the United States, which was founded on liberty and equality, could survive. Thus, Lincoln succinctly expressed the magnitude of the Civil War: What was at stake was not simply lives, or money, or government control, but the very foundations upon which the United States was founded.

The Answer to the fourth one is:  Lincoln means that the extreme sacrifice the men who had fought and died on that battlefield have made was in itself a greater act than any other could now, or ever, perform in ordaining the soil on which they died. Their deed was more than enough for the ground to be consecrated. The blood that was spilt there blessed the soil. It would, he suggests, be presumptuous of him or any other to believe that they could do those who gave their lives greater honor by declaring the ground hallowed, These words indicate the great respect Lincoln had for those who gave up their lives to fight for a noble cause. He wanted them to be honored through more than symbolic gestures such as this one—he felt they should be held in esteem in the hearts and minds of all Americans. That should be how a nation conveys its greatest gratitude.

The Answer to the fifth one is:  he was talking about the speech no one till this day will remember every single detail that was said back then, but will still have little evidence, we all remember what happened but what was all said we do not truly know.

The Answer to sixth one is: Lincoln stated that by struggling and spilling blood and dying on that battlefield, the soldiers themselves have already dedicated, hallowed, and consecrated (which all essentially mean "make something sacred or honored") the area.

The Answer to the seventh one is: If the Union were to give up on the Civil War — and many people supported making concessions to the South to end the war — then these soldiers' deaths would be "in vain," or meaningless. This is both a call to action and a justification for continuing the war.

The Answer to the eighth one is: Lincoln's Gettysburg Address became a rallying cry that easily ushered Lincoln into his second term in office and reinforced Union resolve to win the war.

Explanation:

I got a 100% on my test.

The Counter-Reformation was the Catholic Church's response to the Protestant Reformation the Roman Catholic Church's efforts during the Counter-Reformation were first focused on the internal renovation.

After the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century.Prior to Martin Luther's act, the Counter Reformation took place when 95 theses were mailed to the door of the Castle Church. The influence of the Catholic Church was reduced by the fall of Catholic empires, the end of the Crusades.

The philosophical breakthroughs of the Renaissance any benefits from the Crusades that had helped the Catholic Church reach the pinnacle of its dominance had worn off by the Renaissance, and the Holy Roman Empire had lost its sway. Italy had developed into a trading nation of city states that had lost much of its religious adherence. The influence of Catholicism suffered as a result of individuals starting to critique it since the philosophical thought of the time advocated for the divinity of persons and supported the human spirit.

Complete question:

during the renaissance there was an important reaction against the catholic church and a push back to that some years later. what were these two events called Counter-Reformation.

To know more about Counter-Reformation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24267022

#SPJ4

Answer:

Gods

Explanation:

hope it's correct thank

Answer:

I want to say gods but I am not 100% sure

Explanation:

Douglas was adamantly opposed to black citizenship because he could not imagine blacks as anything other than inferior to whites. I only want white people to be citizens, he proclaimed.

One of the most significant distinctions between Douglas and Lincoln's perspectives on slavery is that, in contrast to Lincoln, Douglas did not see slavery as a moral dilemma, an agonizing choice, or a problem that would split the Union.

Douglass was one of the first black men to be invited to the White House, and he visited with Lincoln to discuss a number of topics, including the unfair treatment and pay of African American soldiers.

Thus, Douglas was adamantly opposed to black citizenship.

For more information about Douglas,click here:

https://brainly.com/question/10409265

#SPJ4

Primary source documents and traditional history textbooks both provide information about the history, but they differ in their approach and purpose. A primary source is a document or artifact that was created during the period being studied, while a textbook is a secondary source that provides an interpretation or analysis of the past.

Using primary sources allows us to go directly to the source and read the words and ideas of people who lived during a specific period. This provides us with firsthand accounts, which can be more reliable than secondary sources. It also allows us to interpret history in our way, without being influenced by the opinions of others.

On the other hand, traditional history textbooks provide a broad overview of a period or event and often present a particular interpretation or perspective. They may rely on secondary sources and include information from many different primary sources. Textbooks can be helpful in providing context and background information but may not always be the most reliable source of information.

They may leave out important details or present a biased view of history. Overall, using primary sources provides us with a more accurate and authentic understanding of history. It allows us to engage with the past in a more direct and meaningful way and helps us to form our interpretations and opinions about history based on our own analysis of the evidence.

You can learn more about traditional history at: brainly.com/question/20255195

#SPJ11

Answer:

I Assume Proud

Explanation:

The name itself means Travelling Companion in Russian. Tracking and studying Sputnik 1 from Earth provided scientists with valuable information.

Answer:Dieppe Raid

Canada United Kingdom Free France United States Poland Czechoslovakia Nazi Germany

Commanders and leaders

Louis Mountbatten John Roberts Trafford Leigh-Mallory John Hughes-Hallett Gerd von Rundstedt Konrad Haase

Strength

The 1919 protest in China against the Treaty of Versailles and foreign influence.

: The 1919 protest in China, commonly known as the May Fourth Movement, was a significant anti-imperialist and nationalist movement that emerged in response to the Treaty of Versailles and foreign influence in China. The movement was sparked by the dissatisfaction with the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, which resulted in the transfer of German concessions in China to Japan rather than returning them to Chinese control. The protesters saw this as a violation of China's sovereignty and an extension of foreign influence in the country. The movement was characterized by mass demonstrations, strikes, and intellectual debates, with its participants calling for political reforms, national independence, and cultural renewal. The May Fourth Movement marked a turning point in China's modern history and had a profound impact on the Chinese nationalist movement and the emergence of the Chinese Communist Party.

Learn more about 1919 protest in China here: brainly.com/question/3522506

#SPJ11

The question above is meant to assess your writing ability and for that reason, it is not right for me to write an essay for you, but I will show you how to write one.

First, you should search for articles and other essays that talk about the growth of executive power. These texts will serve as the basis for your essay, as well as be able to help you find the answers to the questions shown in your question.

After doing this research, you can write your essay as follows:

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/12640882?referrer=searchResults