Write a letter to Martin Luther. The instructions are in the photo, please help!!
WILL MARK BRAINLIST QUICK PLS!!!
Answer:
Explanation:
In late October 1945, Kimiko Keimi and her 13 year old son, Harold “Hal” Keimi, left Heart Mountain, Wyoming, one of America’s concentration camps, to return to Los Angeles. Although they were returning to their hometown, they were unable to reclaim their house, which was adjacent to the laundry that they previously operated in Hollywood. Instead, their final destination became a temporary trailer installation, which the federal government opened for Japanese Americans returning from America’s concentration camps. The trailer that the two shared felt like anything but home. The same could be said for the room that they later shared within a San Fernando Valley home, which Kimiko received as part of her compensation for domestic work. For the first time, the Keimi family was forced to split apart.
In August 1945, oldest son Albert left Heart Mountain ahead of the family to start his final year at Hollywood High School. He would work as a schoolboy, doing chores for a family in Hollywood, in exchange for room and board. A month prior, Thomas, Kimiko’s husband, departed for the Pacific Northwest to take up employment with the railroad. Once Hal recovered from the illness that kept him and his mother at Heart Mountain through the baseball World Series, which Hal listened to intently while he was in the camp infirmary, they qualified for indefinite leave. Kimiko likely hoped that the familiarity of their prewar home would make it easier to reestablish a semblance of a normal life again, as they awaited the day when they would be reunited with the rest of the family. Although Kimiko was distraught over her family’s plan to split up, she knew it was necessary if they were to reestablish the life they previously led before the war. Kimiko and Thomas intended to regain stability for their family, but it would take several years before the family would be reunited. For the Keimis, like so many other Japanese American families, the continuous upheaval that began with the forced removal from the West Coast in 1942, continued with incarceration in temporary detention centers, later in America’s concentration camps, and ultimately persisted into the postwar period.
On February 19, 1942, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, which established a military zone on the West Coast of the United States and determined that the military had the authority to exclude anyone it deemed necessary. There was no specific description of who might be included, but it ultimately laid the foundation for the forced removal and subsequent incarceration of over 125,000 individuals of Japanese ancestry, two thirds of who were American citizens. While the Japanese American population was relatively small in comparison to the demographic makeup of the United States, the concentration of the population was disproportionately on the West Coast—in California, Oregon, and Washington. While the executive order was issued shortly after Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, it was not solely in response to this one act. Instead, it was part of a continuum of a long history of prejudice and discrimination aimed at Japanese immigrants and their American-born children. Detention in America’s concentration camps was never intended to be indefinite.
The objective of the War Relocation Authority, the government agency established to oversee the camps, was to break up concentrations of the Japanese American population on the West Coast by dispersing it widely across the country. Very early on, if incarcerees could demonstrate their loyalty and prove acceptance to a university or offer of employment and housing, they were eligible for indefinite leave. Initially, they could not return to the exclusionary zone on the West Coast. Instead, the War Relocation Authority used promotional brochures and pamphlets, to entice incarcerees to resettle in cities such as Chicago, Cincinnati, Minneapolis, Detroit, and New York.
In December 1944, a test case known as Endo v. United States went before the US Supreme Court to challenge the ongoing mass detention of Japanese Americans, solely on the basis of race. Mitsuye Endo, who was a California state employee prior to World War II, claimed that exclusion from the West Coast prevented her from continuing with her employment. The US Supreme Court ruled in favor of Endo, but was quite careful not to address the topic of constitutional rights. The Supreme Court ruling resulted in the War Department issuing a statement saying that persons of Japanese ancestry…”would be permitted the same freedom of movement throughout the United States as other loyal citizens and law-abiding aliens,” effective January 2, 1945.
Which is not true about the Tennessee Valley Authority?
A. it gave the men of that area work such as planting trees
B. it gave the area electricity
C. It gave the area a flood control area
D. it gave the area recreational facilities
Answer:
A. It gave the men of that area work such as planting trees
What First Amendment right are the people in this photograph
expressing?
A) freedom of the press
B)freedom of religion
C)freedom of assembly
D)right to privacy
Answer:
its freedom of assembly
Explanation:
Making Inferences The treaty states that not only lands now known but even lands "to be found hereafter" belong to one or the other ruler "forever." Suppose a new planet were discovered today. Do you think its lands would be divided in this way? Explain why or why not.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The phrase in this question is from the treaty made between Spain and Portugal in 1494. Even though it was centuries ago land continues to be divided in a similar fashion. Therefore, I believe that if a new planet were discovered today it's land would also be divided in the same way. The first group to discover would most likely claim it for themselves, a war would then break out for control, which would ultimately lead to a similar treaty being drafted and accepted dividing the land between the parties like it has always occurred.
(True or false?)
The Columbian Exchange is also resulted in the re-population of
the new world with Europeans and Africans with the latter the
result of the slave trade.
13 points!!!
Answer:
True.
Explanation: Because they needed more slaves to work on plantations and Europeans came down to make money so they would sell products and while also getting more slaves.
the allied leaders sought to free france with the allied invasion of normandy in june of 1944.truefalse
True. Allied leaders sought to free France with the Allied invasion of Normandy in June of 1944.The Allied invasion of Normandy was the largest seaborne invasion in history and a major turning point in World War II.
The invasion began on June 6, 1944, also known as D-Day, when Allied forces landed on the beaches of Normandy, France.The invasion was a joint effort by the United States, Great Britain, and Canada to liberate France from German occupation. The plan involved a massive amphibious assault on the beaches of Normandy, which were heavily fortified by the Germans.
Despite heavy losses, the Allies were able to establish a beachhead and push inland, eventually liberating Paris in August of 1944.The invasion of Normandy was a significant turning point in the war, as it allowed the Allies to establish a foothold in Western Europe and begin the liberation of France. It also forced the Germans to fight a two-front war, as they were already engaged in a costly war on the Eastern Front with the Soviet Union. By the spring of 1945, the Allies had defeated Germany and won the war in Europe.
To know more about largest visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22559105
#SPJ11
In the 1990s, most immigrants came from
Asia
Europe
Latin America
Answer:
The answer is Europe
Explanation:
Between 1870 and 1900, the largest number of immigrants continued to come from northern and western Europe including Great Britain, Ireland, and Scandinavia.
Answer:
Latin America
Explanation:
significance of the battle of Kannauj in Chapter the coming of Mughal
Answer:
The Mughal Empire at its zenith commanded resources unprecedented in Indian history and covered almost the entire subcontinent. From 1556 to 1707, during the heyday of its fabulous wealth and glory, the Mughal Empire was a fairly efficient and centralized organization, with a vast complex of personnel, money, and information dedicated to the service of the emperor and his nobility.
Much of the empire’s expansion during that period was attributable to India’s growing commercial and cultural contact with the outside world. The 16th and 17th centuries brought the establishment and expansion of European and non-European trading organizations in the subcontinent, principally for the procurement of Indian goods in demand abroad. Indian regions drew close to each other by means of an enhanced overland and coastal trading network, significantly augmenting the internal surplus of precious metals. With expanded connections to the wider world came also new ideologies and technologies to challenge and enrich the imperial edifice.
Explanation:
I HOPE MY ANSWERS HELPS & THANKS FOR LOOKING MY ANSWERS....
What were two competing television technologies in the 1920s?
The two competing television technologies in the 1920s were C. Mechanical vs. optical disk.
During the 1920s, television was in its infancy and inventors were experimenting with different methods to transmit images over long distances. Mechanical television systems were based on rotating disks with holes, known as Nipkow disks, which could scan images and transmit them as electrical signals. Scottish inventor John Logie Baird is credited with developing the first working mechanical television system in 1926. Mechanical systems, while groundbreaking at the time, were limited in resolution and struggled to display smooth motion.
The optical disk technology, while related to television in terms of image storage and retrieval, was not a competing technology for broadcasting at the time. The British vs. American and Russian vs. French options are not relevant in this context, as they refer to nationality rather than specific technological approaches. Therefore, the correct option is C.
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
What were two competing television technologies in the 1920s?
A. British vs American
B. Russian vs French
C. Mechanical vs optical disk
D. Electronic vs mechanical
Know more about Television technologies here:
https://brainly.com/question/14292383
#SPJ11
The british government attempted to restrict westward settlement following the seven years’ war (french and indian war) in order to?
The Seven Years' War was caused by a territorial dispute between the French and the English.
The Seven Years' War strengthened Britain's position as the most powerful European nation on earth. Colonists started to rebel as Britain tried to exert more authority over the American colonies, which ultimately sparked the Revolutionary War.It includes the French and Indian War, 1754-1763. The conflict gave Britain huge North American territory gains, but colonial discontent and military costs led to the American Revolution.French and British imperial authorities and colonists desired to govern border provinces, causing the French and Indian War. France, colonists, and Native allies fought the British, Anglo-American, and Iroquois in North America. In 1753, Great Britain controlled the 13 colonies up to the Appalachians, but beyond was New France, a huge, sparsely inhabited region from Louisiana to Canada. Upper Ohio Valley was a French-British battleground. This land was claimed by France. In 1754, the French defeated George Washington's army. Duke of Newcastle urged retribution after Washington's defeat. His opponents leaked the plans, notified the French, and started a full-scale war.British naval strength and Spanish ineffectiveness defeated a great coalition. Britain seized the French Caribbean, Spanish Cuba, and the Philippines. Spain attacked British ally Portugal, ending European warfare. France and Spain wanted peace in 1763. Britain gained east of the Mississippi and Spanish Florida in 1763 but lost Cuba.British prosperity hurt American possessions. British efforts to charge colonies to pay for the war increased colonial discontent with imperial control. British efforts to limit westward expansion and an unexpected Indian conflict enraged colonists. This started a colonial insurrection and independence war.learn more about the Seven Years' War here- https://brainly.com/question/18144356
#SPJ4
Which answer best describes Andrew Johnson's relationship with the Radical Republicans?
He founded the Radical Republican movement.
He worked with the Radical Republicans to pass important legislation.
He frequently vetoed legislation presented by the Radical Republicans.
He joined the Radical Republican movement when he became president.
He frequently vetoed legislation presented by the Radical Republicans is best describes Andrew Johnson's relationship with the Radical Republicans.
What kind of president was Lyndon B. Johnson?Andrew Johnson was the seventeenth President of the United States, succeeding Abraham Lincoln following his assassination. Johnson was elected to the Democratic Party's ticket as a southerner.
Because of ideological disagreements, the Radical Republicans were opposed to President Johnson's proposals, as he was a Democrat from the southern states.
Thus, option C is correct.
For further details about president was Lyndon B. Johnsonclick here:
https://brainly.com/question/12303607
#SPJ1
About how many workers went on strike during
the year of 1946?
A. Less than 1 million
B. About 5 million
Over 15 million
Answer:
Option B) About 5 million
Explanation:
With the end of the wartime no-strike pledge, workers across America expressed their frustration with wages and working conditions through a series of strikes that involved about 5 million people from the end of 1945 and into 1946.
I am a 3-digit even number. The sum of my 3 digits is 20. I am greater than 40 X 10 I am less than 1000 / 2 (1000 divided by 2) What number am I?
Answer:
488
Explanation:
4+8+8 = 20
40 x 10 = 400
1000/2 = 500
The number is 488. The sum of 488 gives 20. 488 is greater than 400 but less than 500.
The Iraq War is a subject of much debate. In the space below, construct a claim that supports or refutes the decision to invade Iraq. Your claim should be at least 250-words and follow these directions:
Research on your own and find a primary source on the Iraq War
A primary source is an original document or artifact that comes from the period of time being studied.
Someone from that time period actually wrote, created, or used the object the historian is studying.
Using the information from your primary source, and the information from the lesson, develop a claim concerning the decision to invade Iraq.
Fulfill the following concerning your claim:
Your claim should clearly state whether or not the U.S. should have invade Iraq.
Your claim must have supporting statements that are original ideas, as well as facts and evidence from your source, and information from the lesson, that supports it.
You should have a counterclaim that refutes your claim. Your writing will identify the stance and prove that it is false.
Write an informative essay that meets the following expectations:
Establishes and maintains formal and objective tone
Uses words, phrases, and clauses to link each section of writing together and create cohesion between claims and evidence
Follows expectations of conventions
Provide a concluding paragraph that:
Synthesizes your original claim
Summarizes your key points
Adds concluding thoughts
Cite your primary source and this lesson as a secondary source at the bottom of your essay.
Claim: The decision to invade Iraq by the United States was unjustified and should not have been undertaken.
Lack of substantial evidence: Despite claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the presence of such weapons was not conclusively proven, as stated by intelligence reports and subsequent investigations.Questionable motives: Some argue that the invasion was driven by geopolitical interests and a desire for control over Iraq's oil resources rather than genuine concerns for national security or democracy promotion.Destabilization of the region: The invasion led to a power vacuum, contributing to sectarian violence, the rise of extremist groups, and regional instability, rather than achieving stability and peace as intended.Humanitarian and economic costs: The war resulted in significant loss of civilian lives, military casualties, and financial burdens, diverting resources from pressing domestic needs and contributing to long-lasting consequences for the Iraqi population.Counterclaim: The invasion was necessary to remove a dangerous regime and promote democracy.Conclusion: Considering the lack of substantial evidence for WMDs, questionable motives, destabilization of the region, and the human and economic costs incurred, it can be argued that the decision to invade Iraq was unwarranted and should not have been pursued.For more such question on invade Iraq
https://brainly.com/question/26172813
#SPJ8
as commander in chief, the president had the power to
Answer:
Call the military into action
Explanation:
hope it helps!
Why did the British want to win the Battle of El Alamein?
Answer:
im asumming because they had things britains wanted or for land control. You see back then it was always about being the bigger better land. So the fight for power was a thristy one. If a place had something that other places did not obviously their might be a dispute based on that.
Explanation:
Which group believed that equality could not be given, but had to be seized by a powerful, organized Black community.
Which statement explains why African slavery was introduced to the Americas?
A potato famine in Africa forced millions of starving Africans into slavery.
The Indigenous population was reduced, so enslaved Africans were forced to work on the sugar plantations.
The Spanish conquered Africa and enslaved millions of African people.
The Spanish needed a large army to defeat the Indigenous peoples, and enslaved Africans were immune to diseases found in the Americas.
The Indigenous population was reduced, so enslaved Africans were forced to work on the sugar plantations.
I hope this helps. Good luck on your test! : )
Answer: The answer is B
Explanation:
i took it
Based on the map above what area of the world enjoys the highest life expectancy
The area of the world that enjoys the highest life expectancy, given the map of the world, is Western Europe.
How does life expectancy show development ?The average number of years that a person can be expected to live is called life expectancy. It can be estimated for various ages (at birth, at age 65, etc.), and it is done under the assumption that mortality rates according to age are being kept constant (which can also be called age-specific mortality pattern).
It is a measurement that compiles a nation's mortality, allowing us to compare it over generations and spot trends. Its interpretation and significance are more richer and can provide us important details about how well-developed a nation's welfare state is.
Going by the map given, we can see that Western Europe has the highest life expectancies on average because they have a life expectancy of over 80 years. This shows that they enjoy the highest life expectancy which is probably because they are so developed.
Find out more on life expectancy at https://brainly.com/question/27613355
#SPJ1
Answer: Australia
Explanation:
During the 1907 Bellingham Riots, which of the following happened?
-Police cooperated with white workers; no one was prosecuted
-Hundreds of white workers attacked Asian Indian community
-Asian Indians driven out, assaulted, w/ property destroyed
-All of the above
During the 1907 Bellingham Riots, hundreds of white workers attacked the Asian Indian community. Asian Indians were driven out, assaulted, with their property destroyed; this happened during the 1907 Bellingham Riots.
The 1907 Bellingham Riots was an anti-Asian and anti-Indian riot, and it took place in Bellingham, Washington on September 4, 1907. It was one of the biggest and most violent attacks against South Asian immigrants in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States in the early 20th century. The riots were initiated by an angry mob of hundreds of white workers who were protesting the growing number of Asian Indians in the area.
The workers had been protesting for weeks against the Asian Indians, who they felt were taking their jobs and driving down their wages. On September 4, 1907, the mob of white workers marched to the local sawmill, where they believed Asian Indians were working.
They then attacked the Asian Indian workers and drove them out of town. Many of the Asian Indian workers were beaten and had their property destroyed. The police did little to stop the violence, and in some cases, they actively cooperated with the white workers. No one was prosecuted for the attacks, and the Asian Indians were forced to leave the area.
Therefore, this incident showed the deep-seated racism and prejudice against Asian immigrants in the United States at that time.
To know more about Riots, visit:
brainly.com/question/14313362
#SPJ11
Name 4 reasons the U.S. was able to industrialize??? HELPP
Answer:
Abundant natural resources and Abundant labor supply Hopefully it helps
Explanation:
im not too sure about this one, any help ?
Answer:
foot binding
Explanation:
Identify a supreme court case that dealt with these issues, explain what it did
Identify and describe a law passed by congress that made these things illegal
Identify one constitutional amendment that dealt with these practices
—
State laws prohibiting women or blacks or those younger than 21 from voting
Discriminatory government practices that made it difficult to register and vote
Answer: FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of ser- vitude.
Voting Rights Act (1965) This was an act enforce the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution.
Guinn v. United States established a literacy test as a condition for registering to vote or for voting
i hope this helps. I'm sorry if it doesnt.
"The partition of France and Britain to the former territories of the Ottoman empire was a betrayal to their promise of Independence made by them during World War I, why is it so?"
Answer:
Explanation:
The partitioning of the former territories of the Ottoman Empire by France and Britain after World War I is often seen as a betrayal of the promise of independence that was made to the Arab peoples in the region. This perception arises from a combination of factors, including the historical context, conflicting agreements and interests among the Allies, and the ultimate outcome for the Arab populations.
During World War I, the Arab uprising against the Ottoman Empire was supported by the British and French, who sought to weaken their common enemy. In this context, both nations made promises to the Arab leaders, such as Sherif Hussein of Mecca, that if they revolted against the Ottomans, they would be granted independence and self-determination in the post-war period.
However, behind the scenes, the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 and the subsequent Treaty of Sèvres in 1920 revealed the secret intentions of France and Britain. These agreements aimed to divide the Ottoman territories into spheres of influence for the two European powers, disregarding the aspirations of the Arab populations. The borders drawn in these agreements were primarily driven by imperial interests, geopolitical considerations, and the desire to maintain control over strategic regions, such as access to oil resources.
The resulting partitioning of the former Ottoman territories, particularly the creation of the mandates system, administered by France and Britain, further entrenched European control over the region. The Arab populations felt betrayed as their hopes for independence were dashed, and they found themselves living under foreign rule.
Additionally, the Balfour Declaration of 1917, in which Britain expressed support for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, added another layer of complexity to the situation. This declaration further fueled Arab resentment and feelings of betrayal, as it seemed to contradict the promises of self-determination made to them during the war.
The consequences of these actions are still felt today, as the borders drawn by the colonial powers have often resulted in ethnic and religious tensions, ongoing conflicts, and a lack of stability in the region. The partitioning of the former Ottoman territories, seen as a betrayal of the promise of independence, has contributed to the complex and challenging dynamics of the Middle East in the post-World War I era.
The Nullification Crisis occurred over political disagreements about which issue?
Select one:
a. Property taxes
b. Tariffs
c. Internal improvements
d. Antislavery laws
The Nullification Crisis occurred over political disagreements about the Tariffs issue. Option B is correct.
What is the Nullification Crisis?The Nullification Crisis occurred over political disagreements about tariffs. It was a conflict that took place in the United States from 1828 to 1833, primarily between the federal government and the state of South Carolina. South Carolina, led by Vice President John C. Calhoun, claimed that the federal tariffs passed by Congress were unconstitutional and oppressive to their economy, particularly affecting the state's agricultural interests.
The state attempted to nullify or declare void the federal tariffs within its borders, leading to a standoff with the federal government under President Andrew Jackson. The crisis was ultimately resolved through a compromise tariff in 1833, which gradually reduced the rates and defused the tension between the federal government and South Carolina.
Therefore, the correct answer is b. Tariffs.
Learn more about The Nullification Crisis https://brainly.com/question/1637375
#SPJ11
A high life expectancy and literacy rate are signs that a country’s economy is __________.
A.
developed
B.
developing
C.
underdeveloped
D.
undeveloped
Answer:
A. Developed
Explanation:
The answer "A. Developed" is the most appropriate because a high life expectancy and literacy rate are commonly associated with developed economies. Developed countries typically have well-established healthcare systems that contribute to longer life expectancies. Additionally, they prioritize education, resulting in higher literacy rates and a skilled workforce. These indicators reflect a higher level of economic and social development, aligning with the characteristics of developed nations.
How did World War I change the way of life for german americans in the United States?
World War I inspired an outbreak of nativism and xenophobia that targeted German immigrants, Americans of German descent and even the German language. German-born Robert Prager was lynched in Collinsville, Ill., in 1918.
What kept happening at the Ussuri river between the Soviets and Chinese? Why did this worry the Soviets?
Answer:
Explanation:The Ussuri river was the site of multiple border clashes between the Soviets and Chinese in the late 1960s and early 1970s. These clashes were sparked by territorial disputes over the island of Damansky/Zhenbao. In March 1969, a skirmish broke out between Soviet and Chinese troops resulting in dozens of casualties on both sides. The Soviets were worried about the Chinese border incursions and the potential for a full-scale war between the two countries.
Explain the various ways the American Revolution affected society.
Answer:
It changed mostly politically.
Explanation:
Socially and economically speaking the Revolution did not have a major impact, indeed those who were part of the ruling classes remained in the upper classes. Slavery was not abolished after the Revolution, though in the North it was abolished shortly after the revolution.
Politically speaking it led to the creation of the Republic with its principles of liberty. The republic was inspired by the ideals of John Locke. The colonists were no longer the subjects of the British crown.