How did the ideas that came about from the enlightenment and the changes that occurred from the industrial revolution connect to the end of slavery in Western Nations (US, England, France, etc) ? Answer in 3-5 complete sentences. :3 <3

Answer:

NATO and the Warsaw Pact were the creations of multi-lateral organizations by the United States and the Soviet Union at the beginning of the Cold War. NATO was founded in 1949 by the United States and European countries to create a security agreement between the nations following WWII and the Warsaw Pact was created in response in 1955 by the Soviet Union. Each agreement sought to increase the influence of each super power in turn over the other states involved.

Explanation:

For globe maps, the Winkel tripel projection is frequently employed. Oswald Winkel first introduced it in 1921, and it aims to reduce three types of distortion: area, direction, and distance. Gerardus Mercator, a Flemish geographer and cartographer, introduced the cylindrical Mercator projection in 1569.

Gerardus Mercator, a Flemish geographer and cartographer, introduced the Mercator projection in 1569. It is a cylindrical map projection. Its ability to consistently show north as up and south as down while keeping regional directions and features led to it becoming the accepted map projection for navigation.

One of the three projections proposed by German cartographer Oswald Winkel in 1921 is the Winkel tripel projection, a modified azimuthal map projection of the world. The projection is the arithmetic mean of the Aitoff and equirectangular projections. The term tripel, which is German for "triple," alludes to Winkel's objective of minimizing three types of distortion: area, direction, and distance.

Learn more about projection on:

https://brainly.com/question/3703881

#SPJ1

Answer:

what is your langauge i can,t understan

Explanation:

but please like me

Here you go!

Japan was the country who was allowed to keep the German Colonies

Answer:

"Intellectual movement widespread in Europe during the Renaissance and inspired by the Greco-Roman civilization, which valued critical knowledge aimed at greater knowledge of man and a culture capable of developing the potential of the human condition." Check the option that corresponds to this definition. () Renaissance () Protestant Reformation () Humanism

Explanation:

did you want it translated???????

Answer:

As a more difficult animal to hunt.

Explanation:

By 1991, a total of 15 countries broke away from the Soviet Union. The 5th country to break away was Ukraine.

The reasons behind Putin's invasion of Ukraine are complex and multifaceted, but one possible explanation is related to Ukraine's desire to establish closer ties with the European Union and NATO. This move was seen by Putin as a threat to Russia's influence in the region, leading to the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and subsequent military involvement in Eastern Ukraine.

It's important to note that there are various perspectives and interpretations of this event.

Know more about  Soviet Union:

https://brainly.com/question/31565617

#SPJ11

Answer:

~ Assigned as military engineer in US army

~ Distinguished himself as a key figure in Mexican American war Important in several American victories

~ Found key strategic routes that helped America win the Mexican American war

~ Was granted many military awards during his service in US military

~ Met and worked with Ulysses S. Grant during his US military career

~Ultimately resigned from being Civil War Commander to join forces with his native state and was later awarded general-in-chief of all Confederate land forces

~Continuously defeated federal armies in Virginia but was forced to surrender to the Army of North Virginia after several years of fighting and gradual decrease in men and constant defensive actions

~Entered the Engineer Corps in 1829 which led to the promotion from second lieutenant to captain in posts from Georgia to New York

~ Was a primary leader in the Mexican War in 1846 as he invaded Veracruz and captured Mexico City

Explanation:

Hope this helped! :)

Answer:

Explanation:

There could be several reasons for a difference between what was received and what was vouchered in a business or accounting context. Here are some possible reasons:

Quantity Discrepancy: There may be a difference in the quantity of items received and the quantity recorded in the voucher. This could occur due to errors in counting or measuring the received goods or mistakes in recording the quantities on the voucher.

Quality Discrepancy: The received items may not match the expected quality standards or specifications. If the quality is lower than expected, it may result in a difference between what was received and what was vouchered.

Pricing Discrepancy: The prices on the voucher may not match the actual prices agreed upon for the received items. This could occur due to changes in pricing, discounts, or errors in recording the prices during the voucher process.

Damaged or Defective Goods: Some items received might be damaged, defective, or not usable. In such cases, adjustments may need to be made to reflect the difference between the value of the received goods and what was vouchered.

Partial Shipments: If the order was fulfilled in multiple shipments, there might be a discrepancy between what was received and what was vouchered. The voucher might have been created based on the initial shipment, and subsequent shipments may not have been properly accounted for.

Administrative Errors: Human errors during the voucher process, such as data entry mistakes, incorrect calculations, or misinterpretation of information, can lead to differences between the received items and the voucher.

Theft or Loss: In some cases, items may have been stolen or lost between the time of receipt and the voucher creation. This can result in a discrepancy between what was received and what was vouchered.

Timing Differences: If there is a delay between the time of receipt and the creation of the voucher, changes in prices, quantities, or conditions of the goods may occur, leading to differences between the received items and the voucher.

The Free-Soil Party argued that slavery should not be permitted in the new western territories because they felt that allowing it would put free laborers at an economic disadvantage.

They believed that allowing slavery would prevent those seeking economic opportunity from settling in the West and inhibit the economic growth of the region. Furthermore, they were concerned that the spread of slavery would continue to increase tensions between the North and the South.

The Free-Soil Party believed that prohibiting slavery in the new western territories would ensure that all workers would compete on an even playing field and lead to the growth of the area.

They feared that allowing slavery in the West would only reinforce the economic and social disparities between the two regions, and continue to cause conflict.

This party saw economic opportunity as the main factor in supporting the prohibition of slavery in the West.

To know more about economic opportunity click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30824302#

#SPJ11

Explanation:

In the context of hermeneutics, conservative and progressive approaches can lead to different interpretations of the same source text. Here's an example of how each approach might interpret the given passage:

Conservative Approach:

A conservative approach to hermeneutics often emphasizes traditional interpretations and seeks to uphold established beliefs and values. In the case of the given source passage from Matthew 19:4-6, a conservative interpretation might focus on maintaining the traditional understanding of marriage as a union between one man and one woman. The emphasis would be on the permanence and sacredness of the marital bond, as expressed in the phrase "What, therefore, God has joined together, let not man separate." This approach may prioritize preserving the traditional teachings and values derived from the text.

Progressive Approach:

A progressive approach to hermeneutics often seeks to reinterpret and reevaluate traditional interpretations, taking into account contemporary understandings, cultural shifts, and social contexts. In the case of the given source passage, a progressive interpretation might focus on the broader principles of love, equality, and commitment found in the text rather than emphasizing a specific gendered understanding of marriage. This approach may highlight the value of inclusivity and consider other forms of relationships and family structures that may not align with the traditional understanding. It might also consider the historical and cultural context of the passage and the evolving understandings of gender and relationships.

It's important to note that interpretations can vary within each approach, and these examples are just one way of illustrating the differences between conservative and progressive hermeneutical approaches in the context of the given source text.

Answer:

Here are some examples of conservative and progressive approaches to hermeneutics in the context of the passage from Matthew 19:4-6:

Conservative approach:

Progressive approach:

It is important to note that these are just two examples of how the passage from Matthew 19:4-6 could be interpreted using a conservative or progressive approach to hermeneutics. There are many other possible interpretations, and the best approach will vary depending on the individual's beliefs and values.

Here are some additional thoughts on the conservative and progressive approaches to hermeneutics:

Conservative approach:

Progressive approach:

Ultimately, the best approach to hermeneutics is the one that helps you to understand the Bible in a way that is meaningful to you.

Randolph would most likely consider the best strategy, according to civil rights for integrating the armed forces to be organizing to pressure politicians.

Know more about Civil Rights with the help of the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/1142564

#SPJ4

The Greek god who had a great physique was Heracles, also known as Hercules. He was known for his incredible strength and was often depicted with a muscular, athletic build. This is why he is often associated with physical fitness and athleticism.

Heracles was the son of Zeus, the king of the Greek gods, and the mortal woman Alcmene. He is most famous for his Twelve Labors, a series of tasks he had to complete in order to atone for killing his family in a fit of madness caused by the goddess Hera.

These labors included killing the Nemean Lion, slaying the nine-headed Hydra, and capturing the Cretan Bull. Throughout these tasks, Heracles used his great physique and strength to overcome obstacles and complete his tasks.

To know more about Greek gods here:

https://brainly.com/question/3371454

#SPJ11

Answer:

It was signed on June 28, 1919, by the Allied and associated powers and by Germany in the Hall of Mirrors in the Palace of Versailles and went into effect on January 10, 1920. The treaty gave some German territories to neighbouring countries and placed other German territories under international supervision.

To complete the T-chart for the two climates in Western Europe, here is the information you need:

Marine West Coast Climate:

Mediterranean Climate:

Western Europe has two predominant climates: the Marine West Coast Climate and the Mediterranean Climate. The Marine West Coast Climate is found on the western coast of Europe and is characterized by cool to mild temperatures year-round and high precipitation throughout the year, with no distinct dry season. This climate favors dairy farming, grazing livestock, and crops such as wheat and potatoes.

The Mediterranean Climate is found on the southern coast of Europe and is characterized by mild to hot temperatures with mild winters, dry summers, and wet winters. This climate is favorable for growing grapes, olives, and other Mediterranean crops, as well as some livestock farming.

Learn more about Western Europe: https://brainly.com/question/20860525

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. to investigate those accused of disloyalty to the United States

Explanation:

The primary focus of the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in the 1950s was to investigate those accused of disloyalty to the United States. The Committee had the authority to subpoena witnesses and documents and to refer cases for criminal prosecution, which it often did. Its investigations targeted communists, socialists, and other political dissidents, as it sought to prove charges of treason or sedition.

Answer:

national powers are for the whole nation while state powers are vary state to state

The value of the third side cannot be 22 cm, as it violates the triangle inequality theorem. However, it is possible for the third side to have a length of 17 cm, satisfying the triangle inequality theorem.

In a triangle, the length of any side must be less than the sum of the lengths of the other two sides. This concept is known as the triangle inequality theorem.

Let's consider the given side lengths of 11 cm and 8 cm. If the third side were 22 cm, it would violate the triangle inequality since 11 + 8 = 19, which is less than 22. Similarly, if the third side were 17 cm, it would also violate the triangle inequality since 11 + 8 = 19, which is less than 17.

To form a valid triangle with side lengths of 11 cm and 8 cm, the third side must be greater than the difference between these two lengths and less than their sum. In this case, the possible range for the third side is between 3 cm and 19 cm (exclusive).

Learn more about triangle inequality theorem

https://brainly.com/question/30095626

#SPJ11

dd

Explanation:

om Brundage] The fiasco at Damascus gave rise to great bitterness, as William of Tyre noted, both among the Crusaders themselves, who suspected that treachery was involved, and also in the West. After the withdrawal from Damascus, the grand alliance was irrevocably shattered. Conrad of Germany at once set out for home by way of Constantinople. King Louis of France lingered longer in Palestine, but finally left the Holy Land in the summer of 1149 without having attempted any further military action. The attitude of the West toward the Crusade and toward those who bad played a prominent part in it was hostile and suspicious. The anonymous annalist of Würzburg reflects the current Western attitude in his account of the Crusade:

God allowed the Western church, on account of its sins, to be cast down. There arose, indeed, certain pseudo prophets, sons of Belial, and witnesses of anti-Christ, who seduced the Christians with empty words. They constrained all sorts of men, by vain preaching, to set out against the Saracens in order to liberate Jerusalem. The preaching of these men was so enormously influential that the inhabitants of nearly every region, by common vows, offered themselves freely for common destruction. Not only the ordinary people, but kings, dukes, marquises, and other powerful men of this world as well, believed that they thus showed their allegiance to God. The bishops, archbishops, abbots, and other ministers and prelates of the church joined in this error, throwing themselves headlong into it to the great peril of bodies and souls.... The intentions of the various men were different. Some, indeed, lusted after novelties and went in order to learn about new lands. Others there were who were driven by poverty, who were in hard straits at home; these men went to fight, not only against the enemies of Christ's cross, but even against the friends of the Christian name, wherever opportunity appeared, in order to relieve their poverty. There were others who were oppressed by debts to other men or who sought to escape the service due to their lords, or who were even awaiting the punishment merited by their shameful deeds. Such men simulated a zeal for God and hastened chiefly in order to escape from such troubles and anxieties. A few could, with difficulty, be found who had not bowed their knees to Baal, who were directed by a holy and wholesome purpose, and who were kindled by love of the divine majesty to fight earnestly and even to shed their blood for the holy of holies.

Answer: Ok, boring, school

Explanation:

Answer:

if this is for a class then say something like fun interesting learning

Explanation:

if not then long tiring exasperating

In 1939, FDR had Congress modify the Neutrality Acts to allow the United States to sell arms to belligerent nations.

During World War II, the United States remained neutral until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. However, President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) had Congress modify the Neutrality Acts in 1939 to allow the United States to sell arms to belligerent nations.

This modification enabled the U.S. to provide military aid to Great Britain and other Allied powers fighting against Nazi Germany and the Axis powers, without officially entering the war. As part of the lend-lease program, the United States provided military supplies, such as tanks, planes, and ammunition, to Allied countries.

Therefore, the modification of the Neutrality Acts by FDR allowed the United States to provide military aid to Allied powers fighting against Nazi Germany and the Axis powers, without officially entering World War II.

To know more about Neutrality Acts, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29637120

#SPJ11

Which of the following factors most influenced the need for colonial ? The distance between colonial settlements in North America.

The idea of autonomy has a connection to self-government. It is a person's, a state's, or a nation's capacity to exercise self-government. Higher governments, including external forces, are not allowed to monitor self-governing states. Or, to put it another way, a state's citizens are what give it political power. Republicans and Democrats both support these states. The fundamental tenet of many governments, including the federal and state governments of the United States, is self-government. Despite being largely promoted by the United States, the concept of state and individual self-government has gained traction in other nations, including Canada, Greenland, and numerous indigenous groups. We'll mostly be looking at the idea of self-government from a US viewpoint in this post.

Learn more about self-government here

https://brainly.com/question/19226541

#SPJ9

William Penn was a significant figure in American history. The significance of William Penn are Founder of Pennsylvania, Advocate for Religious Freedom, Development of a Representative Government, and Treaty with Native Americans.

Founder of Pennsylvania: William Penn played a crucial role in the establishment of the colony of Pennsylvania in 1681. He received a land grant from King Charles II of England, which gave him control over the region. Penn envisioned Pennsylvania as a place where religious freedom and equality would be upheld, and he actively encouraged settlers from different religious backgrounds to come and settle in the colony.

Advocate for Religious Freedom: Penn was a strong advocate for religious freedom and tolerance. He believed that individuals should be able to practice their religion without fear of persecution. In Pennsylvania, he ensured that settlers of different faiths, including Quakers, Mennonites, and Jews,

Were given the freedom to worship as they pleased. This commitment to religious freedom made Pennsylvania an attractive destination for those seeking refuge from religious persecution in Europe.

Development of a Representative Government: Penn established a framework for self-governance in Pennsylvania. In 1682, he drafted a constitution known as the "Frame of Government" or the "Great Law," which outlined the powers and responsibilities of the government and provided for the election of representatives.

This document served as a model for later democratic constitutions and influenced the development of American democracy.

Treaty with Native Americans: Penn is also known for his peaceful relations with Native Americans. In 1682, he signed a treaty with the Lenape tribe, known as the "Treaty of Shackamaxon." This agreement established a mutual respect between the settlers and the Native Americans, leading to peaceful coexistence and trade.

Penn's fair treatment of the Native Americans set a positive example for future relations between European settlers and indigenous peoples.

To know more about Advocate , visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29240836

#SPJ11

The statement, "Throughout the city, police officers patrol the streets and neighborhoods of St. Louis," best illustrates how the government enforces laws and provides protection for citizens.

The option (B) is correct.

Police officers are government officials whose primary responsibility is to enforce the laws and ensure the safety of citizens. Police officers patrol neighborhoods and streets to maintain public order, respond to emergency calls, and prevent and investigate criminal activities.

Through their work, police officers maintain law and order and protect citizens. In addition to patrolling the streets, police officers have other responsibilities like investigating crimes, making arrests, and testifying in court cases. Police officers are responsible for enforcing traffic laws, investigating traffic accidents, and providing emergency assistance to motorists in need of help.

Hence, The option (B) is correct.

Learn more about police officers:

https://brainly.com/question/14695122

#SPJ11

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

Throughout the city, police officers patrol the streets and neighborhoods of St. Louis. This image best illustrates how the government:

(A) collects money by building and selling its vehicles

(B) enforces laws and protects citizens

(C) provides every official with transportation

(D) spends tax dollars without consent

Answer:

A. defined the status of enslaved persons and the rights of their owners.

Explanation:

The Slave Codes were laws that defined what slaves could and could not do. They also established the rights of their owners, regarding things like punishment for their slaves.

The Slave Codes were only for African slaves and their owners and did not regard indentured servitude.

The Slave Codes were basically just laws that restricted slaves and made them inferior in society.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

Mansur believed that Baghdad was the perfect city to be the capital of the Islamic empire under the Abbasids. ... The city was designed as a circle about 1 km (0.62 mi) in radius, leading it to be known as the "Round City".

Answer:

The round city was special because Mansur believed that Baghdad was the perfect city to be the capital of the Islamic empire under the Abbasids.