How did the expansion of Rome affect...

The creation of the merchant class:

The religious beliefs of people who Rome conquered:

The Roman economy and its growth?

Answer

It is a policy favoring native-born Americans over immigrants

Explanation:

Nativism during the 1800s is best described as a policy favoring native-born Americans over immigrants. Thus the correct option is A.

Nativism is refers to a policy that aims to protect the right of individuals who are natives who are born in the country as compared to those who migrate in search of opportunities.

The individual from home locations move or transferred to foreign locations in search of livelihood and seek better opportunities for the future to have financial stability is called Immigrants.

When immigrants entered the United States they cretes threats among the natives as they bring skills and talents with them which can create problems for natives or inhabitants so native policy helps to protect their interests.

Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about nativism, here:

https://brainly.com/question/20919422

#SPJ6

Answer:

. The British received Canada from France and Florida from Spain, but permitted France to keep its West Indian sugar islands and gave Louisiana to Spain.

The militia snuck into the fort while the British were sleeping.

The Green Mountain Boys, a militia formed in 1770 to protect the property rights of local landowners, joined the revolutionary cause without hesitation at Fort Ticonderoga, which was situated just across Lake Champlain from Vermont. A small group of American militiamen, led by Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold, crossed Lake Champlain early on May 10, 1775, surprised and taking prisoner the British garrison at Fort Ticonderoga, which was still asleep.

The Battle of Fort Ticonderoga, the first rebel victory of the Revolutionary War, gave the Continental Army crucial artillery in the first year of the conflict and boosted morale. At Fort Ticonderoga, cannons were taken, and they were employed in the victorious siege of Boston the following spring.

To learn more about militia visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11287808

#SPJ9

Pro-choice advocates in the Texas believe that individuals should have the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion.

Advocates are individuals or organizations who support a particular cause or group, and work to promote and defend their interests. Advocates can be found in a variety of contexts, including legal, social, and political arenas. They may use a range of strategies to advance their cause, such as lobbying lawmakers, organizing protests, or using social media to raise awareness. Advocates may also provide support and resources to individuals affected by the issue they are advocating for. Some examples of advocacy include disability rights advocacy, environmental advocacy, and animal rights advocacy. Advocates play an important role in raising awareness and promoting positive change, and their efforts can lead to significant improvements in the lives of those they represent.

The four reasons are:

1) Autonomy: Pro-choice supporters believe in individual autonomy, or the right of an individual to make decisions about their own body and health care without government interference.

2) Privacy: Supporters of pro-choice believe that individuals have the right to privacy when making decisions about their own reproductive health, and that the government should not be involved in these personal decisions.

3) Equality: Pro-choice supporters argue that restrictions on abortion access disproportionately affect marginalized communities, and that everyone should have equal access to reproductive health care.

4) Safety: Advocates for pro-choice argue that restrictions on abortion access can make the procedure less safe and increase the risk of complications for individuals seeking abortions.

To learn more about advocacy, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31346785

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

Pro-choice in Texas debate give four reasons to support?

The essay on All That She Carried: The Journey of Ashley’s Sack, a Black Family Keepsake, historian Tiya Miles provides a multilayered account of African American History across generation is given below.

In his meditation on the mother-daughter relationship between Rose, Ashley, and Ruth, Miles wrote All that She Carried. In it, he examines the sack's contents and their significance as well as what they reveal about enslavement, survival, maternal love, and the persistence of Black women's stories and their history. All That She Carried is a book about love, trauma, resiliency, and hope. However, Miles also uses creative archive and historiographic techniques to tell these women's experiences.

Miles makes observations about the research techniques she does throughout the book to piece together the lives as Rose, Ashley, and Ruth. She considers what she terms "archival deficit" and "archival diminishment," archival realities in which the lives of enslavers are documented while there is little conventional documentation of enslaved people's lives, particularly the lives of enslaved women.

Her' reflections are immediately worth mentioning to historians in our field. The "Black feminist historical approaches" of scholars like Nell Irvin Painter and Marisa Fuentes are used by Miles to address these deficiencies. These methods "refuse to abandon Black women to the discursive abyss" (17).

According to Miles, "Telling one's own life's narrative is to transform that life since telling is an action that can affect how one feels about the past" (231). The epilogue of Miles' historiographic method, "A Little Sack of Something," wraps up All That She Carried.

Learn more about slavery from

https://brainly.com/question/9374853

#SPJ1

The court case/legal doctrine that was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education is the Separate but Equal” doctrine.

The  reasons why the Supreme Court give in ruling that segregated schools were unconstitutional because "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal,

The south challenge orders to integrate by making a campaign of "Massive Resistance"however  the federal government respond by handling the case proper.

It should be noted that the Brown v. Board of Education (1954)  can be seen as the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision  which was able to struck down the “Separate but Equal” doctrine  as well as  outlawed the ongoing segregation in schools.

Howeevr the Supreme Court's decision  can be seeen as  unanimous and felt that "separate educational facilities  are been considered to be inherently unequal," whichg can be seen as the violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment .

Learn more about court

https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ1

Answer:

this document is about inalienable rights so the answer should be to protect the natural rights of its citizens

Answer:

D. the industrial revolution

Explanation:

People had lots of materials, goods, and weapons and that idea of total war became more and more appealing because they needed laboroers the for the new factories.

Answer:

D. Wood

Explanation:

Wood doesn't attract with a magnet.  A magnet is not attracted to a piece of wood because no internal field is induced in the wood.  With no induced internal field in the wood, there is no field interaction and no attraction.

Hope this will help. Please mark me brainliest.

cobalt

Explanation:

yrdudfxhvkbjvifufifufuf7d7figigig8r6rit7e6f

Explanation:

a tax on goods leaving or enteringthe country.

The dual-language format of the Florentine Codex, incorporating both Spanish and Nahuatl, serves as a testament to the collaborative efforts between the Spanish and Nahua scholars in documenting and preserving the rich heritage of the Aztec civilization.

According to "New World Rising," the Florentine Codex, also known as the General History of the Things of New Spain, is a monumental ethnographic work documenting the Aztec civilization.

This important manuscript, compiled in the 16th century, was written in both Spanish and Nahuatl.

The Florentine Codex is a result of a collaboration between Spanish Franciscan friar Bernardino de Sahagún and indigenous Nahua scholars. It is considered one of the most comprehensive and detailed sources on the Aztec culture and society before the arrival of Europeans.

The text is primarily written in Spanish, as it was the language understood by the European scholars and authorities of the time.

Bernardino de Sahagún, along with his team of Nahua assistants, meticulously transcribed and translated the oral traditions, rituals, history, religious beliefs, and daily life of the Aztecs from Nahuatl into Spanish.

However, to preserve the authenticity and nuances of the Aztec culture, the original Nahuatl version was also recorded alongside the Spanish text.

The Nahuatl language was the native language of the Nahua people, including the Aztecs, and was an integral part of their cultural identity.

The inclusion of the Nahuatl language in the Florentine Codex was essential for accurately conveying the intricacies of Aztec concepts, terminologies, and expressions that may not have had direct equivalents in Spanish.

It allowed for a more comprehensive understanding of the Aztec civilization, ensuring that their worldview and cultural practices were faithfully represented.

It remains a valuable resource for researchers and historians studying Mesoamerican history and culture.

For similar questions on Florentine Codex

https://brainly.com/question/28225779

#SPJ8

The dual-language format of the Florentine Codex, incorporating both Spanish and Nahuatl, serves as a testament to the collaborative efforts between the Spanish and Nahua scholars in documenting and preserving the rich heritage of the Aztec civilization.

The Florentine Codex, also known as the General History of the Things of New Spain, is a monumental ethnographic work documenting the Aztec civilization.

This important manuscript, compiled in the 16th century, was written in both Spanish and Nahuatl.

The Florentine Codex is a result of a collaboration between Spanish Franciscan friar Bernardino de Sahagún and indigenous Nahua scholars.

It is considered one of the most comprehensive and detailed sources on the Aztec culture and society before the arrival of Europeans.

The text is primarily written in Spanish, as it was the language understood by the European scholars and authorities of the time.

Bernardino de Sahagún, along with his team of Nahua assistants, meticulously transcribed and translated the oral traditions, rituals, history, religious beliefs, and daily life of the Aztecs from Nahuatl into Spanish.

However, to preserve the authenticity and nuances of the Aztec culture, the original Nahuatl version was also recorded alongside the Spanish text.

The Nahuatl language was the native language of the Nahua people, including the Aztecs, and was an integral part of their cultural identity.

The inclusion of the Nahuatl language in the Florentine Codex was essential for accurately conveying the intricacies of Aztec concepts, terminologies, and expressions that may not have had direct equivalents in Spanish.

It allowed for a more comprehensive understanding of the Aztec civilization, ensuring that their worldview and cultural practices were faithfully represented.

It remains a valuable resource for researchers and historians studying Mesoamerican history and culture.

For similar questions on Florentine Codex

brainly.com/question/28225779

#SPJ8

Answer:

Islam is the second largest religion today. Christianity is the first

Answer:

They all feature animals/organisms as key parts of the story/characters.

Explanation:

Turning red has the red panda
Black panther has... the black panther
The mandalorian has baby yoda

Answer:

They all have some time of animal or creature featured in them

Explanation:

You have written a letter to President Truman either supporting or opposing the use of the atomic bomb. Complete one of ...

https://brainly.com/question/9233806?utm_source=android&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=question

Answer:

I think it was Shah Jahan

Explanation:

---

Answer: Definition:  A special benefit or immunity granted to people allowing them to do something.

Sentence: My mom gave me the privilege to spend the weekend at my  friends house because, I had good grades in all my classes

Yes, it is convincing. Mr. Pooley, the owner of the factory, questioned Holme about the possibility that their association would have influenced his assessment of the health of his employees.

A factory, also known as a manufacturing plant or production facility, is a type of industrial building that frequently consists of numerous buildings that are all filled with machinery and is used to create goods or run machines that turn one thing into another.

The vast majority of the world's goods are produced or processed in factories, making them an essential component of contemporary economic output.

When the space and financial needs for cottage industry or workshops increased throughout the Industrial Revolution, factories were created. The term "glorified workshops" has been used to describe early factories that only had a few pieces of machinery, such as one or two spinning mules, and a small number of employees.

Learn more about factory, here

https://brainly.com/question/18123987

#SPJ1

The person that has to be entitled to US citizenship must first have to do the following:

This is the process that is used to refer to the state of being a legal member of a nation. That means that a person through naturalization would be regarded as a citizen of the United States.

Apart from naturalization by birth, where a person is an American because his or her parents are Americans, these are the ways that people can become citizens of the US.

Read more on naturalization here: https://brainly.com/question/589817

#SPJ1

The way in which the children were keen on asking questions in a curious way, which developed the humor in the passage upon the children's reactions.

A part of an act or a situation wherein a laughable or a rather enjoyable situation is developed is known as a situation of humor. The given passage involves humor being developed as the story progresses.

In the passage, the story develops a humor by the way of children asking curious questions to their elders.

Hence, the significance of humor is aforementioned.

Learn more about humor here:

https://brainly.com/question/11513133

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Tariff of 1828 had driven Vice President Calhoun to pen his “South Carolina Exposition and Protest,” in which he argued that if a national majority acted against the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void—or nullify—federal law. By the early 1830s, the battle over the tariff took on new urgency as the price of cotton continued to fall. In 1818, cotton had been thirty-one cents per pound. By 1831, it had sunk to eight cents per pound. While production of cotton had soared during this time and this increase contributed to the decline in prices, many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank.

Resentment of the tariff was linked directly to the issue of slavery, because the tariff demonstrated the use of federal power. Some southerners feared the federal government would next take additional action against the South, including the abolition of slavery. The theory of nullification, or the voiding of unwelcome federal laws, provided wealthy slaveholders, who were a minority in the United States, with an argument for resisting the national government if it acted contrary to their interests. James Hamilton, who served as governor of South Carolina in the early 1830s, denounced the “despotic majority that oppresses us.” Nullification also raised the specter of secession; aggrieved states at the mercy of an aggressive majority would be forced to leave the Union.

On the issue of nullification, South Carolina stood alone. Other southern states backed away from what they saw as the extremism behind the idea. President Jackson did not make the repeal of the 1828 tariff a priority and denied the nullifiers’ arguments. He and others, including former President Madison, argued that Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution gave Congress the power to “lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises.” Jackson pledged to protect the Union against those who would try to tear it apart over the tariff issue. “The union shall be preserved,” he declared in 1830.

To deal with the crisis, Jackson advocated a reduction in tariff rates. The Tariff of 1832, passed in the summer, lowered the rates on imported goods, a move designed to calm southerners. It did not have the desired effect, however, and Calhoun’s nullifiers still claimed their right to override federal law. In November, South Carolina passed the Ordinance of Nullification, declaring the 1828 and 1832 tariffs null and void in the Palmetto State. Jackson responded, however, by declaring in the December 1832 Nullification Proclamation that a state did not have the power to void a federal law.

A portrait of Robert Hayne is shown.

The governor of South Carolina, Robert Hayne, elected in 1832, was a strong proponent of states’ rights and the theory of nullification.

With the states and the federal government at an impasse, civil war seemed a real possibility. The next governor of South Carolina, Robert Hayne, called for a force of ten thousand volunteers to defend the state against any federal action. At the same time, South Carolinians who opposed the nullifiers told Jackson that eight thousand men stood ready to defend the Union. Congress passed the Force Bill of 1833, which gave the federal government the right to use federal troops to ensure compliance with federal law. The crisis—or at least the prospect of armed conflict in South Carolina—was defused by the Compromise Tariff of 1833, which reduced tariff rates considerably. Nullifiers in South Carolina accepted it, but in a move that demonstrated their inflexibility, they nullified the Force Bill.

The Nullification Crisis illustrated the growing tensions in American democracy: an aggrieved minority of elite, wealthy slaveholders taking a stand against the will of a democratic majority; an emerging sectional divide between South and North over slavery; and a clash between those who believed in free trade and those who believed in protective tariffs to encourage the nation’s economic growth. These tensions would color the next three decades of politics in the United States.

Explanation:

Answer:

Enacting the Tariff of 1828

Explanation:

Since the person above me wasn't helpful at all with their answer, let me give you a REAL answer.

I attached a photo down for proof.

Good luck on your test! :)

Answer:

Of particular importance is the Court's recognition that the Rule of Law is embodied in the Canadian constitution – the supreme law which sets out our government structures and powers and which delineates the relationship between the various orders of government and the Canadian people.

Answer:

B. France allowed colonies to maintain separate cultures.

Explanation:

The largest difference between France and British colonization is the amount of effort put into colonizing a area. France, for the most part of the Americas, simply set up trading forts to mostly trade with the Native Americans in the region, and even with other colonies, typically have a more off-hand approach to the colonies. However, it is important to note that France did not take lightly of any colonies that tried to break away, and would fight to stay in control (See the Haitian revolution, as well as the Indochina Wars).

Britain, on the other hand, typically settled the territories that they acquired at a significantly higher rate, and brought British values and beliefs with them into the new world. Britain's exploration can typically be broken into separate entries (much like Spain), in which settlements could fall into the categories of spreading religion (whether it is state-sponsored (Protestantism), or persecuted groups within Britain who left to find religious freedom in the new world (such as Catholics and Puritans). Settlements that soon followed would include state-sponsored as well as company-sponsored (the East India Company being a well-known one), which, while it promised settlers a new life, also led to the settlements providing new world resources and valuables in which the company can profit off of in the old world.

~

Learn more about the history surrounding European settlements in America, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1453575

Answer:olympic games

Explanation:

The US country participated in the Soviet-Afghan War by initiating an operation for the support of the Mujahedeen people.

Soviet-Afghan War was the national warfare brought out between Afghanistan and the Soviet Union in the year 1979.

During the Soviet-Afghan War, the US government started a secret operation supporting the Arabic people against the armed forces of Afghanistan. The US country actually supported the Soviet Union in order to defeat Afghanistan.

Therefore, the act of providing support to Mujahedeen or Arabic citizens is the reason for the involvement of the US country in the Soviet-Afghan War.

Learn more about the Soviet-Afghan War in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/23021413.

#SPJ1

While there are valid arguments both for and against the Electoral College, I believe that it should be maintained as the process to elect the President of the United States. It provides representation for smaller states, promotes stability, and helps maintain a two-party system. However, discussions and potential reforms to address the concerns raised by the popular vote vs. electoral vote discrepancy should be encouraged to ensure a fair and democratic electoral process.

The current process to elect the President of the United States is done through the Electoral College. This means that instead of being directly elected by the popular vote, the President is elected by a group of electors who are chosen by each state. Each state is allocated a certain number of electors based on its representation in Congress, with a total of 538 electors nationwide.

In my opinion, the President of the United States should continue to be elected by the Electoral College for several reasons. Firstly, the Electoral College ensures that the interests of smaller states are not overshadowed by larger states. This is because each state is given a minimum of three electoral votes, regardless of its population size. This system prevents candidates from focusing solely on densely populated areas and neglecting the concerns of rural or less populated regions.

Secondly, the Electoral College promotes stability and prevents hasty decision-making. It serves as a buffer between the popular vote and the final decision, allowing for a more deliberative and thoughtful process. This is especially important during times of crisis or uncertainty, as the Electoral College can act as a safeguard against impulsive or uninformed choices.

Thirdly, the Electoral College encourages a two-party system and helps to maintain political stability. Due to the winner-takes-all nature of most states' electoral votes, third-party candidates face significant challenges in gaining enough electoral support to win. This promotes a more unified and coherent political landscape, which can enhance the effectiveness of governance.

However, it is important to acknowledge the counterarguments against using the Electoral College to elect the President. One main argument is that it can lead to a candidate winning the popular vote but losing the electoral vote, as seen in the 2000 and 2016 elections. This can be seen as a flaw in the system, as it goes against the principle of majority rule.

For more such questions on two-party system, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/26695072

#SPJ8

Answer:

It was convened by the emperor Constantine to resolve the controversy of Arianism, a doctrine that held that Christ was not divine but was a created being.

Explanation: