Answer:
Characteristics of the city in a polis were outer walls for protection, as well as a public space that included temples and government buildings.
What are the effects of following the crowd? Would the witch hunts and McCarthyism have been possible without the support of others? Why do you think people supported these prejudiced hunts?
oh ok this as easy as 2 + 2 = 3
what were the major policy elements of the war on terror in the wake of september 11, 2001?
The major policy elements of the War on Terror in the wake of September 11, 2001, included AUMF, Invasion of Afghanistan, DHS, USA PATRIOT Act etc.
1. Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF): Passed by Congress shortly after the 9/11 attacks, the AUMF granted the President the authority to use all necessary and appropriate force against those responsible for the attacks, as well as those who harbored them.
2. Invasion of Afghanistan: In October 2001, the U.S. and its allies launched Operation Enduring Freedom, which aimed to dismantle the Taliban government in Afghanistan and destroy the al-Qaeda terrorist network responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
3. Establishment of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS): In 2002, the U.S. government created the DHS to streamline and consolidate various federal agencies responsible for ensuring the country's safety and security.
4. Implementation of the USA PATRIOT Act: This legislation, passed in 2001, expanded the surveillance powers of law enforcement and intelligence agencies in order to prevent future terrorist attacks.
5. Creation of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA): Established in 2001, the TSA was formed to strengthen aviation security and prevent hijackings and other threats to air travel.
6. Development of enhanced interrogation techniques: These controversial methods, including waterboarding, were used by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to extract information from suspected terrorists in the wake of 9/11.
7. Invasion of Iraq: In 2003, the U.S. and its allies launched Operation Iraqi Freedom, which aimed to remove Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein from power and eliminate his purported weapons of mass destruction (WMDs).
8. Global counterterrorism partnerships: The U.S. expanded its collaboration with various countries and international organizations, such as NATO and the United Nations, to coordinate efforts in combating terrorism worldwide.
9. Surveillance and intelligence gathering: Increased surveillance and intelligence gathering efforts were employed both domestically and internationally to identify and thwart potential terrorist plots.
10. Implementation of targeted drone strikes: The use of drone strikes became a primary tool in the U.S. counterterrorism strategy, targeting key terrorist leaders and infrastructure in countries such as Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia.
These policies aimed to protect the U.S. and its allies from future terrorist attacks and disrupt the global networks that support terrorism.
To know more about War on Terror refer here: https://brainly.com/question/13048497#
#SPJ11
The present-day. United States was home to both Mississippian cultures
and the Cherokee peoples.
A. northeastern
B. southwestern
C. southeastern
D. northwestern
SUBMIT
The present-day South-eastern United States was home to both Mississippian cultures and the Cherokee peoples.
What is Mississippian cultures?From roughly 800 CE to 1600 CE, with some regional variation, the Mississippian culture was a thriving Native American civilization in what are now the Midwestern, Eastern, and Southeastern United States. It was well renowned for creating substantial earthen platforms as well as several different shapes of mounds. It was made up of a number of satellite villages and urban communities that were connected by slender commercial networks. The largest city was Cahokia, which is thought to have been a significant religious hub and was situated in what is now southern Illinois.
To learn more about Mississippian culture visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14313375
#SPJ13
Answer: Answer is C.
Explanation:
What is the goal of the ISIS terrorist group?
A,) to take over oil fields in iran and saudi arabia
B.) to avenge the death of osama bin laden
C.) to punish the us for the war in afganistan
D.) to create an islamic state referred as a caliphate across sunni areas of Iraq and in syria
Answer: The answer is D
Explanation:
Through its territory and its economy — loose terms that shouldn't suggest ISIS is a legitimate state — ISIS hopes to spread an extremist, wholly outdated version of a religion that isn't even recognizable as Islam. ISIS is made up of Sunni Muslims, and most of the cities it controls are filled with large Sunni populations. In fact, most Muslims — as many as 90 percent — identify as Sunnis. The Sunni faction of Islam, as opposed to the Shia tradition, is often considered the more traditional sect. ISIS takes this traditionalism to an extreme level, supporting the treatment of women and minorities as slaves and brutally murdering people of Western cultures and religions in the name of jihad. ISIS' version of Islam is so far removed from any culturally accepted version of today that some experts say it can't even be considered Islam.
"They would like the entire world to be Muslim, but they want the world to be Muslim in a very, very narrowly defined manner," William Beeman, chair of the anthropology department at the University of Minnesota told a local CBS affiliate. "They are fundamentalist Muslims, and their idea of Islam is quite different from the rest of the Islamic world."
why did the Ghandi-Jinnah Talks failed in 1944?
Answer:
By the autumn of the year 1944 the situation in British India had reached to a critical level. The Second World War was raging full tilt in most parts of the world. India was itself in real peril of an invasion by imperialist Japan. By that time the war had caused a debilitating strain on Great Britain’s resources and her financial reserves were all but depleted. Indian natives belonging to all communities and groups viewed the unfolding historical drama with increasing anxiety that arose from their feelings of uncertainty for their future. Fate had placed their imperial masters in the very discomfiting position of asking their subjects for help in routing another imperial adversary. However, time and circumstances could not allow an indulgent reflection on this historical irony for the colonial subjects of India. Especially for the Indian leaders time was of the essence as here was an opportunity to strike while the iron was hot. But just as England needed the Indians, so the Indians needed England, which despite its indisposition was nevertheless the only empire left which could bring some semblance of order to the global upheaval that threatened to lead to total destruction. Now this equilibrium of need allowed for negotiations between Indian politicians and the British as to the future of India. By this time Indian leaders throughout the political spectrum were demanding complete self-rule. Indian society was fast agitating against the patronizing and condescending hegemony of their colonial masters and ached to break free from the shackles of foreign subjugation. But the fate of India could not be decided by one community or social group alone. India was home to the world’s most diverse ethnic, linguistic and religious population. Indeed it was the British who had united this land through a long and usually violent process of consolidation. In the century since the complete conquest of India by England, nationalist feelings had started to take shape among the natives which was encouraged by the British for very pragmatic reasons. The territorial consolidation of India however favoured some more than others. In the new colonial India, Hindus found themselves in the enviable position of being the community having the biggest strength in sheer numbers. In contrast Muslim nationalism arose from feelings of shared loss and fall from grace they enjoyed as the ruling culture in the lands now occupied by the British. Thus two distinct nationalist currents dominated the intellectual climate in India and both were simultaneously shaping the consciousness of Hindu and Muslim communities.
Now that India seemed to be slipping fast from the grasp of the British Raj, the leaders of both Hindu and Muslim communities, each of which by that time had clear visions of the aspirations and goals of their respective constituencies, needed to find a common-ground so that freedom from colonial rule could finally be achieved. To clarify the picture let us examine the positions of the parties that held the keys to India’s destiny. There were three prime stake-holders in the political landscape of India. These were the principal parties that had the most to gain or lose from the critical decisions that would shape the course of India’s history. A brief summary of their position and concerns is outlined below.
His Majesty’s Government (H.M.G):
Besieged on all fronts and running fast towards bankruptcy, the British position in India was further complicated by growing resentment among the native population. Lord Wavell, the viceroy in India, in a letter to the Secretary of State for India, summarized the British position in this way “With a lost and hostile India, we are likely to be reduced in the east to the position of commercial bag-man.”1 He went on to write “The Congress and the League are the dominant parties in Hindu and Muslim India, and will remain so… We cannot by-pass them, and shall be compelled in the end to negotiate with them along with representatives of the less important parties.”1
Which factor was a key reason that the Greek city-states had strong economies?
A.
the mountainous terrain
B.
a booming system of trade
C.
stable governments
D.
wealth gained from conquests
E.
climate suited for farming
Stable governance was a crucial reason that the Greek city-states had a successful economy. In ancient Greece, Athens was the dominant city-state administration. Hence, the correct answer is (C) stable governments.
What exactly does it mean for a country to be stable?Economic stability is defined as the lack of large swings in the macroeconomy. Economic stability is defined as an economy with relatively consistent production growth and low and stable inflation.
Economic stability is defined as the lack of large swings in the macroeconomy. Economic stability is defined as an economy with relatively consistent production growth and low and stable inflation. An economically unstable economy has numerous major recessions, a marked business cycle, highly high or fluctuating inflation, or frequent financial crises.
To learn more about Stable governments, click
https://brainly.com/question/29545192
#SPJ1
who is the president in 1875
Answer:
Ulysses S. Grant was president in 1875.
Answer:
Ulysses S. Grant
Explanation:
Please help I’m really struggling
What is the difference between gross pay and net pay?
A.Gross pay is before taxes and deductions are subtracted; Net pay is your take-home
pay.
B.Net pay is before taxes and deductions are subtracted; Gross pay is your take-home
pay.
C.There is no difference between gross and net pay.
What is a constitutional initiative and how is it an example of democracy at work?
A constitutional initiative is a process by which citizens can propose changes to their state or national constitution through a petition process.
What role do courts and other legal institutions play in reviewing and interpreting constitutional initiatives?Courts and other legal institutions play an important role in reviewing and interpreting constitutional initiatives. They are responsible for ensuring that proposed initiatives comply with legal requirements and are consistent with the constitution. Once an initiative is passed, courts may be called upon to interpret its provisions and resolve any disputes that arise. This process helps to ensure that the constitutional initiative process is fair, transparent, and consistent with the rule of law.
It is an example of democracy at work because it allows citizens to have a direct say in the governing process and ensures that the government is accountable to the will of the people.
Through the constitutional initiative, citizens can bypass the legislative process and take matters into their own hands, making it a powerful tool for direct democracy.
To know more about Democracy visit:
brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ1
Hlep plz and thank u
Answer:
1. m= 2
2. m= 3
3. m= 5
4. m= 1
Explanation:
i hope this helps :)
Identify the explorer who completed the expedition outlined on the map above. What were the goals and outcomes of his expedition?
Answer:
The explorer who completed the expedition outlined on the map above was Juan de Oñate. Oñate was asked to govern a settlement near present-day Santa Fe known as San Juan de los Caballeros. He soon grew bored with his daily duties and decided to begin a search for the Seven Cities of Cíbola where Francisco Vázquez de Coronado left off. He traveled to Quivira, and like Coronado, he was unable to find gold. He asked the American Indians numerous questions and eventually established a friendly rapport. Overall, Oñate viewed his expedition as a failure because he was unable to locate the cities of gold. His journals, however, did provide valuable information about the territory around Oklahoma and the American Indians who lived in the region.
Explanation:
That's the answer from edegnuity.
Causes and Effects How did the French Revolution affect American politics?
The French Revolution had a profound impact on American politics. It inspired democratic ideals and influenced political divisions within the United States.
The revolution's ideals of liberty and equality resonated with American thinkers, shaping the evolution of party politics and prompting debates over the role of government. It also affected diplomatic relations, as the United States declared neutrality to protect its interests during the revolution.
The Jay Treaty and the XYZ Affair further strained relations with France. The revolution's radical phase and Reign of Terror raised concerns about potential chaos, leading to the suppression of dissent through legislation like the Alien and Sedition Acts.
Ultimately, the French Revolution played a significant role in shaping American political ideologies, diplomatic decisions, and the early party system.
To know more about French Revolution refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/9053584
#SPJ11
Could you pleaseeee help me i need some help i need it before tomorrow at 4:00pm
1. Cause:
Increased demand for land west of the Appalachian. Increased number of "pilgrims" to the west. Annexation of Texas by the Federal Government.
2. Cause:
Need for more land for western settlers. National "Manifest Destiny" dream. US and Britain settlement.
3. Cause:
Cessation of south-western territories to the US. Increased land mass and space for settlers.
in 1975, a civil war between maronite christians and muslims began in this country.
Answer:
IN
April 13, 1975 – October 13, 1990
The Lebanese Civil War of 1975 was in Lebanon
Explanation:
Why did southern senators initially block the organization of the kansas and nebraska territories?a. they thought the railroad that would be built there would only benefit the north. b. they did not think the area’s indigenous peoples should be moved to oklahoma. c. they worried that the area’s indigenous peoples would be relocated to the south. d. they were afraid the new free states would tip the balance in congress against them.
Southern senators initially block the organization of the Kansas and Nebraska territories because - d. they were afraid the new free states would tip the balance in congress against them.
Concerns about representation in Congress were raised by southern senators. Because the Missouri Compromise stipulated that Kansas and Nebraska would become free states if they joined the Union, the Southern states in this case opposed their addition as states. This was bad news for senators from the South since it meant that there would be more members of Congress who might oppose slavery and work to abolish it. The phrase "tipping the balance" refers to this. Southerners were concerned that there would be more Congressmen opposed to slavery who may use their political influence to abolish the practice entirely.
Here is more information about Union: brainly.com/question/12003424
#SPJ4
Answer: The answer is D) They were afraid the new free states would tip the balance in congress against them.
Explanation: I did it on Edge and got it right :))
I want to know more about modern Chinese history
Answer:
The Second Opium War was a war of aggression against China jointly launched by Britain and France with the support of the United States and Russia from October 1856 to October 1860. The purpose is that Britain and France will further open up the Chinese market and expand their aggression interests in China. Because Britain and France launched wars under the pretext of the Yarrow incident and the Ma priest incident respectively, they were called 'The Arrow War' by the British. Also known as 'Anglo-French expedition to China' or 'Second Anglo-Chinese War'. At the same time, because this war can be regarded as the continuation and expansion of the first Opium War , it is also called the 'Second Opium War'.
In 1860, the British and French forces invaded Beijing, the Qing emperor fled to Chengde, and the British and French forces broke into the Yuanmingyuan and plundered the jewelry and burned it. During the war, after sending troops, Tsarist Russia claimed to be the biggest winner by claiming that it was 'merited in mediation' and coerced the Qing government to cede more than 1.5 million square kilometers of territory. The war ended when the Qing government was forced to sign the Treaty of Beijing.
The Second Opium War forced the Qing government to successively sign the Sino-Russian 'Aigun Treaty', 'Tianjin Treaty' and 'Beijing Treaty' and other peace treaties, and the foreign powers invaded more deeply. As a result, China lost a total of more than 1.5 million square kilometers of territory in the northeast and northwest. After the war, the Qing government was able to concentrate its efforts to suppress the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom and maintain its rule. Foreign aggression forces expanded to the coastal provinces and the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.
Explanation:
How did Rome and Greece influence Western Civilization in philosophy?
Answer:
Explanation:
sry have the same question
What was the legal status of african slaves prior to dred scott v. Sandford? did the decision in this case change their status?.
Prior to the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, African slaves were considered property under the law.
The Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857 did not change their legal status, but it did reinforce the idea that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens of the United States and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise of 1820 unconstitutional, stating that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in any territory, which further intensified the issue of slavery in the United States.
what is territory?
In general, territory refers to a geographical area or region that is controlled by a particular government or political entity. A territory may be defined by physical boundaries such as natural features like rivers, mountains, or coastlines, or it may be defined by artificial boundaries such as borders established by treaties or agreements between nations. Territories may be administered as colonies, protectorates, or other forms of dependent territories, or they may be fully integrated into the governing country. The term can also refer to a particular area or region that is inhabited by a particular group of people, such as an indigenous territory.
To learn more about African slaves visit:
brainly.com/question/1309064
#SPJ11
Why does Frederick Douglass say he is uncomfortable giving
Please help. What was the tone of Khrushchev's letter to Kennedy? Support your answer with evidence from the primary source.
The tone of the letter above from Khrushchev to Kennedy can be said to be conciliatory.
What did Khrushchev talk about?The Cuban Missile Crisis brought the world to the brink of nuclear war when President Kennedy refused to back down from a threat to invade Cuba.
Khrushchev acted to avoid this war by sending the above letter to Kennedy which was meant as a conciliatory gesture to get the U.S. president to agree to peace.
Find out more on the letter from Khrushchev at https://brainly.com/question/15408745
#SPJ1
Answer:
The overall tone was one of warning. Khrushchev reminded Kennedy multiple times about what the consequences of war would be and how the entire world would be affected, maybe even destroyed. He also warned Kennedy that if the United States pursued war by starting a conflict with its naval blockade, the Soviet Union would respond with war. When he compared the crisis to a knot that was getting tied tighter and tighter, he was warning Kennedy not to take any actions that would push both countries over the edge and into nuclear war.
Explanation:
plato
What role did geography play in the economic development of colonial cities in the Mid-
Atlantic Colonies?
The mountainous regions of the colonies contained coal, which led to industrial development.
The abundance of flatland made it easier for cities to be built and to expand as more people came.
O The presence of natural harbors helped many cities became prosperous centers of trade and
shipping.
O The region contained numerous freshwater lakes, which led to a thriving fishing industry.
Answer:
The presence of natural harbors helped many cities became prosperous centers of trade and shipping.
Explanation:
These colonial cities in the Mid-Atlantic Colonies included Delaware Colony, New York Colony, etc and because of the natural harbors they had, they were able to become prosperous traders.
Geography and climate, by extension helped trading activities to boom, because they took advantage of their rich agriculture to export food and other natural resources.
HHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP MEEEEE PPPPPLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZ
What was the effect of Japanese imperialism on the development of nationalism in the early 1900s?
Imperialism caused the Japanese to lose interest in nationalism as they explored other parts of the world.
Imperialism brought other cultures to the Japanese and nationalism waned.
Nationalism developed very slowly.
Nationalism became an important part of Japanese culture.
Answer: Japan had always been a very insular country before the 1900's however, the effect of Japanese imperialism on the development of nationalism in the early 1900's was that Nationalism became an important part of Japanese culture.
Explanation:
Which characteristics of government would the Federalists and their supporters have favored?
Group A
Group B
Please answer I will give brainliest
Answer:
Explanation:
Group A
Answer:
B
Explanation:
its flipped for me
Explain how the disciplines of Linguistics, Anthropology, Archaeology, and Geography have enhanced history writing on Africa using Great Zimbabwe as an example.
1 1. Thomas needs to add a sentence to the end of the second paragraph (sentences 5-9) to bring the paragraph to a more effective closing. Which of the following should be added after sentence 9 to help close this paragraph? O The basin is very different from anything I had seen before. e O We knew it was wrong to leave trash in the basin. 0 Do O The basin was a place that deserved to be saved. 0 Qo O I wanted to explore the basin the first time I saw it. O CLEAR ALL
Answer:
I think its A B C or D
Explanation:
Answer:
C! The basin was a place that deserved to be saved.
Explanation:
how did yellow journalism help start the spanish american war?
Answer:
Yellow journalism played a significant role in creating the conditions that led to the Spanish-American War in 1898. At the time, newspapers in the United States were engaged in a fierce competition for readership, and sensationalistic stories that emphasized violence, sex, and scandal were seen as a way to boost sales.
One of the most prominent examples of this style of journalism was the coverage of the conflict in Cuba between Spanish colonial forces and Cuban rebels seeking independence. American newspapers, led by William Randolph Hearst's New York Journal and Joseph Pulitzer's New York World, printed exaggerated and often fabricated stories of Spanish atrocities against the Cuban population. These stories played on Americans' sympathies for the Cuban rebels and created a sense of outrage and a desire for intervention.
The most famous example of this kind of reporting was the "De Lome letter," in which Spanish ambassador to the United States, Enrique Dupuy de Lome, criticized President William McKinley in a private letter that was stolen and published by Hearst's newspaper. The letter was seen as an insult to American honor and helped to further inflame public sentiment against Spain.
The sinking of the USS Maine in Havana harbor in February 1898, which killed 266 American sailors, was also heavily covered by the yellow press. Although the cause of the explosion that sank the ship was never definitively determined, many newspapers blamed it on Spain, creating a frenzy of jingoistic sentiment and calls for war.
Overall, yellow journalism helped to create an atmosphere of sensationalism, exaggeration, and emotion that helped to shape public opinion and push the United States toward war with Spain. While there were certainly other factors that contributed to the outbreak of the conflict, the role of the press in shaping public opinion cannot be overstated.
Explanation:
Can someone help me plzzzz!!
Answer: the first one
Explanation:
why was the philadelphia (constitutional) convention (may 1787) assembled? (select all answer choices that apply)
Answer:- Armed rebellions had begun to arise in several states, in particular shay's rebellion.- Congress couldn't afford to order union troops to quell emerging rebellions.
Explanation:Troubles with the existing Confederation of States finally convinced the Continental Congress, in February 1787, to call for a convention of delegates to meet in May in Philadelphia "to devise such further provisions as shall appear to them necessary to render the constitution of the Federal Government adequate to the exigencies of the Union."
how many gold medals did jesse owens win in the 1936 berlin olympics?
Jesse Owens won four gold medals at the 1936 Berlin Olympics: the 100 meter, 200 meter, long jump, and 4x100 meter relay.
The 1936 Berlin Olympics, officially known as the Games of the XI Olympiad, were held from 1 to 16 August 1936 in Berlin, Germany. This was the first Olympic Games held in Germany since 1912, and the first time the Nazi Party had control of the event.
The 1936 Games were the most successful in the history of the Olympic movement, with a total of 4,066 athletes from 49 countries participating in 131 events in 19 sports. German athletes won the most medals, with 89 gold, 55 silver, and 37 bronze.
Jesse Owens, an African American athlete, won four gold medals in track and field events, embarrassing Adolf Hitler and his vision of Aryan supremacy.
To learn more about Berlin Olympic 1936 link is here
brainly.com/question/19692339
#SPJ4
At the beginning of the Civil War, the South had an advantage over the North in
1. farm acreage
2. capital stock of banks
3. value of farmland
4. railway mileage
DLL
Answer: 1.
Explanation:
I would say 1. The south never really had a great advantage over the north- they did have a lot of farms but that wasn't super helpful. The north was richer because of more factories, had better weaponry and a lot more railroad track laid.
For what it's worth though, the south also had an advantage in manpower- about 75% of their population signed up for the war, while only about 50% did from the north.