How did Oklahoma keep blacks from attending the University of Oklahoma
Answers
Answer:
Ada Lois Sipuel Fisher, from Oklahoma, was a leader in the nationwide Civil Rights Movement. Fisher dreamed of being a lawyer, but Langston University, an All-Black college she was attending, did not have a law school. Colleges and universities were segregated, so Fisher was not allowed to attend a school in Oklahoma that had a law school. She decided to apply for the law program at the University of Oklahoma anyway. The university denied her admission due to the segregation laws. She filed a lawsuit against the school. Amos T. Hall and Thurgood Marshall were her lawyers. Jake Simmons helped fund her case. The case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court. The case, Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, declared that she must be allowed the same opportunities for education as everyone else. After three years, in 1949, she was allowed to attend the University of Oklahoma.
Fisher and fellow African American students, although allowed to attend universities in Oklahoma, were still segregated within the schools. The school forced Fisher to sit in a chair with a chain around it and a sign that read “Colored.” Black students were also made to sit in a different part of the cafeteria and in a separate, back part of the classroom. An African American student from Oklahoma, George W. McLaurin, took this issue to court. In 1950, the US Supreme Court ruled in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents that this was not allowed.
With the efforts of Oklahomans and people nationwide that participated in the Civil Rights Movement, our society changed so that all people, no matter the color of their skin, can be together whether in school, at home, or in public places. However, today people do not always treat each other with fairness and respect. Bullying continues to be a problem in school, but you can continue to help the Civil Rights Movement by making a friend with a classmate who may be different from you or standing up to someone who may be bullying a classmate or friend.
Explanation:
I'm from Oklahoma, So I know all about Oklahoma History!!
Fisher and fellow African American students, although allowed to attend universities in Oklahoma, were still segregated within the schools. The school forced Fisher to sit in a chair with a chain around it and a sign that read “Colored.” Black students were also made to sit in a different part of the cafeteria and in a separate, back part of the classroom. An African American student from Oklahoma, George W. McLaurin, took this issue to court. In 1950, the US Supreme Court ruled in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents that this was not allowed.
Related Questions
FILL THE BLANK. _____ are all examples of mandatory spending.
A)Social Security, interest on the national debt, and Medicare
B)National defense, income security, and veterans' benefits
C)National defense, Social Security, and veterans' benefits
D)Social Security, veterans' benefits, and Medicareecognize that beliefs help people ____ while attitudes help people ____.
Answers
Social Security, interest on the national debt, and Medicare. The correct answer to the first question is A
Mandatory spending refers to government spending that is required by law or based on entitlement programs, which means the government must pay out benefits to those who are eligible. Social Security, interest on the national debt, and Medicare are all examples of mandatory spending.As for the second question, beliefs and attitudes are both important aspects of a person's mindset, but they serve different purposes. Beliefs are convictions or principles that a person holds to be true, while attitudes are feelings or opinions that a person has about something or someone. Beliefs help people make sense of the world around them, and they can provide a foundation for decision-making and behavior. Attitudes, on the other hand, can influence how people react to certain situations or stimuli, and they can shape how people perceive and interact with others.In conclusion, mandatory spending includes Social Security, interest on the national debt, and Medicare, while beliefs and attitudes serve different functions in a person's mindset.
To know more about Social Security visit:
brainly.com/question/32221263
#SPJ11
why did many northerners consider conscription to be unfair during the u.s. civil war?
Answers
It allowed wealthier draftees to hire substitutes and avoid fighting.
What is conscription?
Conscription is the practice of requiring individuals to enlist in a national service, typically the military. Conscription has existed since antiquity and is still practiced today in some nations under various titles. Every male resident of the United States is obliged by law to register with the Selective Service System and be eligible for a draught within 30 days after turning 18; this is sometimes done automatically by a motor vehicle department during licensing or by voter registration. Conscription, which is legislation stating that if you are physically capable of fighting, you must fight, may be implemented by the military when there are insufficient volunteers to fill the requirement for soldiers to fight in a conflict.
To learn more about conscription click on the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/4933973
#SPJ4
why was manufacturing timber a major industry in the northern colonies?
Answers
The manufacturing of timber was a significant industry in the northern colonies because of the extensive forests found there. The industry expanded because of the high demand for wood to construct ships, houses, and furniture.
Furthermore, the development of sawmills aided in increasing the amount of wood that could be harvested and manufactured. New England's dense forests provided the colonies with a readily available supply of timber to support the thriving shipbuilding industry.Timber was an essential commodity for trade, and its abundance made it a reliable source of income for the colonies. The forests supplied a vast range of valuable products and natural resources, such as maple syrup, lumber, and turpentine. The exploitation of these resources, combined with the trade and sale of lumber and other timber products, created a self-sufficient economic system within the colonies. In summary, the abundance of forests in the northern colonies, the high demand for wood, the development of sawmills, and the lucrative trade in timber products made the manufacturing of timber a significant industry in the northern colonies.
To know more about industry visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32605591
#SPJ11
Was a nineteenth-century artistic movement that influenced nationalism in europe. it emerged as a reaction to the emphasis on in enlightenment philosophy.
Answers
Romanticism was a nineteenth-century imaginative development that impacted patriotism in Europe. It arose as a response to the accentuation of Reason in Illumination reasoning.
Romanticism was the nineteenth-century imaginative and scholarly development that affected patriotism in Europe. The specialists attempted to make social solidarity which turned into the underpinning of patriotism in Europe.
Sentimentalism arose as a response to Illumination reasoning as it underscored feelings, opportunity, and individual creative minds and went against logical legitimization and the glorification of science.
It began as a response to investing more amounts of energy in Illumination reasoning. Through this development, Europe acquired a personality all around the world. Besides, the development set a scholarly underpinning of the Illumination and made a better approach to communicating an individual's lifestyle through enthusiastic sentiments
To learn more about enlightenment philosophy here
https://brainly.com/question/2724457
#SPJ4
to
3) The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the US Mexican War and settled differences between the two countries. Which THREE statements were terms of the Treaty of Guadalupe
Hidalgo?
A) The U.S. paid Mexico 515 million
B) Mexico regained its control of New Mexico Territory
C) Texas' annexation was approved by the United States government
D) The border between the US and Mexico was set at the Rio Grande
E) Mexico gave the US its northern territories, including California, Nevada, and Arizona
Answers
Answer:
I think its C
Explanation:
The 3 statements which were terms of the Treaty of Guadalupe includes:
The U.S. paid Mexico $15 millionTexas' annexation was approved by the United States government Mexico gave the US its northern territories, including California, Nevada, and ArizonaThe Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the US-Mexican War because its settled the differences between the countries.
The treaty signed among the nation resulted to approval of Texas' annexation to the United States government.
Aftermath the war, the U.S. paid Mexico a sum of $15 million and agreed to settle all claims of her citizens against Mexico.
The treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo includes agreement to ceded some territory including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Texas, Colorado, Nevada, Utah to the United States.
Therefore, the Option A, C ad E is correct.
Read more about this here
brainly.com/question/21603849
How did the New Jersey Plan influence the current formation of American constitutional government?
A.
It proposed an equal number of senators per state.
B.
It proposed a bicameral (two houses) legislature.
C.
It proposed that all slaves would be counted in a state's population.
D.
It proposed representation based on state population.
Answers
Answer:
i thinks its A
Explanation:
William Paterson's New Jersey Plan proposed a unicameral (one-house) legislature with equal votes of states and an executive elected by a national legislature. This plan maintained the form of government under the Articles of Confederation while adding powers to raise revenue and regulate commerce and foreign affairs.
Could ancient egypt be classified as a communist country?
Answers
No. The Ancient Roman economy was actually based on the private land ownership and the slavery. It was nothing like any form of the socialism.
The economy of the Ancient Roman Empire was to be predominantly agrarian: the Roman landowners, the agricultural laborers, and also the small tenant the farmers were they highly dependent upon one of the another for assuring stability. Agriculture was the basis of there economy. There were mostly little of the farmers but also the wealthy landowners that was employed so many peasants and the slaves to work on their huge lands. The main crops were, that logically, the Mediterranean triad of the wheat, grapes and the olives.
To know more about Ancient Roman visit:
https://brainly.com/question/765845
#SPJ1
Three Sisters" farming was an agricultural system of companion planting innovated by the Iroquois-speaking peoples of the Northeast; farmers planted corn, beans, and squash together. The beans used the cornstalks as a trellis to grow on, but how did beans benefit the other two plants in the system?
Choose 1 answer:
A: bacteria on the roots of beans 'fix' nitrogen from the atmosphere into the soil, fertilizing the earth for the benefit of the corn and squash
B: bean leaves provided crucial shade for the squash, which can be damaged by too much direct sunlight; the shade enabled the squash to develop vital nutrients
C: bean shoots reached out and strangled weeds, leaving the way clear for the other companion plants
Answers
Answer:
option "A"
Explanation:
beans actually have the capacity to boost nitrogen into the soil and surrounding which help other plants in nutritients
PLS HELP ASAP!!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!HURRY ILY
The United
States entered a
conflict in the
2000s that will
most likely
never end - the
war on which of
the following?
A. Drugs
B. Poverty
C. Terror
Answers
Answer:
c
Explanation:
because soldiers were frightened during war
Answer:
B.Terror
Explanation:
The united states started a war on Terror in the 2000s after 9/11.
Drugs wouldn't be right as it started in the 1980s
The war on poverty started in the 1960s which makes that also incorrect.
Hence,
The war on terror is the right answer
The Third French Republic faced and survived which of the following challenges?
Answers
Challenges that were faced and survived by the Third French Republic include coups, canals in panama and the Dreyfus Affair so D. All of the choices are correct.
What challenges did the Third French Republic face?The Third French Republic was established in 1870 when the French Emperor Napoleon III was defeated by the Germans under the leadership of the Prussians.
From the onset, the Third French Republic had several challenges including an attempted coup by General George Boulanger in the late 1880s when he tried to leverage on being a war hero.
There was also the thousands of lives and money that were lost on trying to construct the Panama Canal which failed and had to be passed on to the United States. The Dreyfus Affair then came in 1894 and led to a lot of political intrigue in France until 1906.
Options for this question include:
a) an attempted coup d’etat by general george boulanger, a popular war herob) a failed attempt to build a canal in panamac) the scandal of the dreyfus affaird) all of the choices are correctFind out more on the Third French Republic at https://brainly.com/question/661689
#SPJ1
what two groups arrived in large numbers in the united states for the primary purpose of working on the transcontinental railroad?
Answers
Answer: Chinese and irish immigrants
Explanation:
Which group wanted to lower taxes and cut social programs in the South in
the late 1800s?
A. The Republican Party
B. African American churches
C. African Americans
ОО
D. The Democratic Party
Answers
Answer:
The Democratic Party
Explanation:
Which group wanted to lower taxes and cut social programs in the South in the late 1800s?
The Democratic Party
Malaria is caused by a
Answers
why was the decade of the 1890s considered a decade of crisis
Answers
Answer:
. Admission of California. The Gold Rush led to population growth- and problems. California applied to be a free state, but the South is upset. So, Henry Clay proposes the Compromise of 1850
Explanation:
sorry if its wrong
briefly explain ONE major difference between Wood's and Bailyn's historical interpretations
Answers
Answer:
The definition of that same query given has been summarized elsewhere here.
Explanation:
The ONE big contrast between some of the historical perceptions of Wood's as well as Bailyn about why the American revolution led a rebellion against both the British seems to be:
However as per Wood, on the reasonable definition, the native Americans rebelled as well as revolted. They would have the mentality that they would be "established heirs to liberty" and also that certain everyday routine is democracy.6. What if the government set strict limits on people spending money to get the
assistance of counsel, or to educate their children, or to have abortions? Or
what if the government banned candidates from traveling in order to give
speeches? Would these hypothetical laws be unconstitutional under the
reasoning the Court applied in Buckley and Citizens United? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
The hypothetical laws described in the question could potentially be unconstitutional under the reasoning applied in Buckley and Citizens United.
Buckley v. Valeo and Citizens United v. FEC were both cases that dealt with the First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations to engage in political speech and spending. The Supreme Court in both cases held that restrictions on political spending by individuals or organizations violated the First Amendment's protection of free speech.
If the government were to set strict limits on people spending money to get the assistance of counsel, to educate their children, or to have abortions, it could be argued that these restrictions would violate the First Amendment's protection of free speech and free association. For example, if the government limited the amount of money that could be spent on legal representation, this could limit an individual's ability to express themselves through their choice of legal representation, or limit their access to justice.
Similarly, if the government banned candidates from traveling in order to give speeches, this could be seen as a restriction on political speech that would likely be unconstitutional under the reasoning applied in Buckley and Citizens United.
Overall, the question of whether these hypothetical laws would be unconstitutional under the reasoning applied in Buckley and Citizens United would depend on the specific details of the laws and how they were applied. However, it is possible that restrictions on spending or political speech in these contexts could be seen as violating the First Amendment's protections
According to the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Buckley and Citizens United, laws limiting rights to legal representation, education, reproductive rights or a candidate's campaigning might be seen as unconstitutional due to the violation of rights under the Constitution.
Explanation:The hypothetical scenarios seems to limit major rights: the right to legal representation, the right to education, the reproductive rights, and freedom of speech for government candidates. The context of both the Buckley v. Valeo and Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decisions surrounds campaign finance, with the courts holding that limits on campaign expenditures are unconstitutional as they infringe upon the First Amendment’s freedom of speech. Using that reasoning, if a law severely limited a citizen's ability to obtain counsel, educate their children, secure an abortion, or if it had a similar impact on a candidate’s campaign activities, they could be seen as unconstitutional due to infringements on rights protected under the Constitution.
Learn more about unconstitutional here:https://brainly.com/question/33239112
#SPJ11
What is the most important event taken place in the U.S in the 1860s and Why?
Answers
Answer:
the most important event was the civil war because it resulted in the slaves being freed and the start of a new era in American history
Explanation:
HELPPP!!!! How does the current standoff between the United States and North Korea relate to the UN intervention in 1950??
Answers
Answer:
The current standoff between the United States and North Korea relates to the UN intervention in 1950 because the United States has a political conflict with the Soviet Union, which backs North Korea. Also, in the UN intervention, the United States backed South Korea because their governments were similar.
Explanation:
Please mark as brainliest!
hagia sophia using two examples of specific visual evidence, explain how this work demonstrates continuity with established architectural traditions
Answers
The Byzantine engineering of Hagia Sophia filled in as a motivation for the overwhelming majority other Ottoman mosques like Istanbul's Blue Mosque. In 1985, Hagia Sophia alongside Istanbul's other major notable structures and areas were together proclaimed an UNESCO World Legacy site.
Why is Hagia Sophia exceptional?
It filled in as a focal point of strict, political, and creative life for the Byzantine world and has furnished us with numerous valuable insightful experiences into the period. It was likewise a significant site of Muslim love after Ruler Mehmed II vanquished Constantinople in 1453 and assigned the construction a mosque.
How does the Hagia Sophia show this blend of societies?
The city's most renowned church, the Hagia Sophia, mirrored the city's social dissemination. At the point when it was assembled, the congregation showed the design styles of the Western Roman Domain. Monstrous blocks of marble, imported from Egypt and Italy, covered the walls. The above vault bended 105 feet (32 m) from east to west.
What are a portion of the highlights of the Hagia Sophia that make it an extraordinary illustration of Byzantine design?
The Hagia Sophia's Plan
It joined the conventional plan components of a Customary Basilica with an enormous, domed rooftop, and a semi-domed special stepped area with two narthex (or "yards"). The vault's supporting curves were covered with mosaics of six winged heavenly messengers called hexapterygon.
Learn more about Byzantine here:
https://brainly.com/question/1446842
#SPJ4
The European voyages of discovery primarily originated with competition between the Protestant and Catholic churches. for the riches of the spice trade. to create larger empires as a mark of power.
Answers
The European voyages of discovery primarily originated to create larger empires as a mark of power. The main driving force behind the European voyages of discovery was the desire to establish and expand empires as a symbol of power and influence.
European nations, including Spain, Portugal, England, France, and the Netherlands, embarked on exploratory expeditions to stake claims, establish colonies, and secure valuable resources.During the Age of Exploration, the concept of mercantilism gained prominence, which emphasized the accumulation of wealth and resources as a measure of national power. European powers sought to control trade routes, establish colonies for resource extraction, and gain dominance over lucrative markets.While the quest for the riches of the spice trade did play a role in motivating exploration, it was not the primary driver. The pursuit of wealth and resources, including spices, was intertwined with the broader ambition of creating larger empires and expanding political influence.
learn more about voyages here :
https://brainly.com/question/30647713
#SPJ11
Does the dominant narrative matters??
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
A dominant narrative can generalize the lived experiences of people within the dominant culture. The metanarrative among the dominant culture creates the notion that whiteness is the norm, and that the dominant culture is the normal culture to which other cultures need to adapt.
match each country below to its role in the 1956 suez crisis.
A. Egypt
B. The United States
C. Israel
D. Britain
1. home to the Suez Canal
2. used intense diplomatic pressure to put a stop to the 1956 invasion
3. part-owner of the Suez Canal, and the dominant Western power in the Middle East prior to 1956
4. newly founded state in the Middle East that participated in the 1956 invasion
Answers
The role of each country in the 1956 Suez crisis are: Egypt-home to the Suez Canal, Israel-newly founded state in the Middle East that participated in the 1956 invasion, the United States used intense diplomatic pressure to put a stop to the 1956 invasion, and Britain-part-owner of the Suez Canal, and the dominant Western power in the Middle East prior to 1956.
The Suez Crisis, commonly known as the Second Arab-Israeli War or the Sinai War in Israel, was an invasion of Egypt by Israel in late 1956, which was then joined by the United Kingdom and France. On October 29, 1956, Israeli armed troops invaded Egypt and advanced toward the Suez Canal, a crucial canal that controlled two-thirds of the oil consumed in Europe.
This action set off the Suez Crisis. Gamal Abdel Nasser, the president of Egypt at the time, nationalized the canal in July of that year. As a result of Egypt's victory, Gamal Abdel Nasser rose to prominence in the eyes of Arab and Egyptian nationalism. Israel was not granted access to the canal, but it did reclaim its shipping privileges in the Taiwan Straits.
To know more about Suez Crisis refer to: https://brainly.com/question/509235
#SPJ4
What is meant by a "wall of separation?"
Answers
Answer:
government and religion are wholly distinct and can be divided as though by a physical structure.
Explanation:
The wall of separation presupposes that government and religion are wholly distinct and can be divided as though by a physical structure. A strict wall would eliminate practices that even supporters of strict separation now take for granted: for instance, military chaplains and tax exemptions for religious organizations.
The lesson states that it is often said that the Emancipation Proclamation freed no slaves. Despite this the Emancipation Proclamation is one of the seminal documents in United States history. Do you think that the Emancipation Proclamation accomplished Lincoln's goals? Why or why not?
Your response should be 3-5 sentences long and show that you’ve thought about the topic/question at hand. Please be aware we are looking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION and there is not a single “correct answer.”
Answers
The Emancipation Proclamation in part did Lincoln's desires by moving the point of interest of the Civil War to slavery and undermining the Confederacy's financial system, however, it did now not offer immediate freedom or protections for all slaves.
In my opinion, the Emancipation Proclamation did accomplish a number of Lincoln's desires, but no longer all of them. The proclamation succeeded in moving the point of interest of the Civil War to the difficulty of slavery and helped to undermine the Confederacy's economy by means of freeing slaves who had been pressured to paint on plantations.
However, it did not straight away lose all slaves, because it simplest applied to areas nevertheless in rebellion. Additionally, it did now not offer any rights or protections for the newly freed slaves, leaving them liable to violence and discrimination.
Learn more about Civil War:
https://brainly.com/question/28968808
#SPJ1
What was Queen Elizabeth's purpose for her speech?
Answers
History of European fashion
Answers
Answer:
the term (from Latin modus) was used with regard to clothing as early as the 15th century and used of the term subsequently spread
William Marbury was appointed to the Cabinet by John Adams. True or false
Answers
True, William Marbury was appointed to the Cabinet by President John Adams in 1796 as a justice of the peace. He was appointed to be part of the Federalist-controlled "midnight appointments" of Adams' last day in office.
Who was William Marbury appointed by?William Marbury was appointed by President John Adams in 1801 as an individual holding the office of Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia. Marbury had been a supporter of the Federalist Party, which had lost the election of 1800 to the Democratic-Republican Party. Marbury was appointed as a last-minute effort by Adams to ensure that the Federalist Party maintained some influence in the incoming Republican-controlled government. Marbury's appointment was part of a larger wave of appointments and commissions that Adams issued on the last day of his term. The commissions were never officially delivered to their intended recipients, and Marbury sued the incoming Secretary of State, James Madison, in an effort to compel Madison to deliver the commission. The case, Marbury v. Madison, eventually reached the Supreme Court and established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to invalidate unconstitutional laws. Marbury's appointment was a crucial part of the history of the United States, as it established a precedent that has shaped the way that government works in the United States ever since.To learn more about William Marbury refer :
brainly.com/question/30561588
#SPJ1
Which of these four Texas leaders did NOT serve in the United States Congress?
a.
Sam Rayburn
b.
Henry Gonzalez
c.
Ann Richards
d.
Phil Gramm
Answers
Answer: The answer D and no they did not serve in the United States Congress.
HURRY!!!! I NEED HELP!!!!!
Answers
Answer:It is D)
Explanation:
What did the people of the Middle Ages eat for breakfast? vegetables fruit meat bread
Answers
Answer:
Bread
Explanation:
Barley bread, porridge, gruel and pasta, for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Grain provided 65-70% of calories in the early 14th century.
Answer: For breakfast, only a piece of bread was served.
Explanation: I hope I helped!