Answer: Biological theories and Sociological theories
Explanation:
.
Officers have been called to the scene of an altercation outside a crowded restaurant. Two men were evidently arguing over a sports event. The argument escalated, with both men throwing punches. By the time officers arrived on the scene, one man was holding his nose, which was profusely bleeding. The other was nursing a quickly blackening eye. Several people loitered around the entrance to the club. After speaking with both men on the scene, officers leave without making an arrest. What is the MOST likely reason for their choice in this situation?
Neither man wanted to press charges.
There were no witnesses to verify the fight.
There was no video camera footage of the fight.
The officers did not see evidence of a crime.
Answer:
Neither man wanted to press charges.
Explanation:
I'll just say why the other answers are wrong
B. There are witnesses, it says that several people were loitering around the club
C. There does not need to be camera footage of the fight to arrest one or both of the men and charge them with assault, battery, etc.
D. The officers arrived after the fight had ended and they had been injured, also officers do not personally have to witness a crime to charge an individual with one.
Match each individual to appropriate level of corrections.
1. Michelle was arrested for a DUI on Friday. Her arraignment is scheduled for Monday.
community release
2. Lloyd was recently found guilty of murder. He is serving a fifteen-year sentence.
state facility
3. Stan was found guilty of robbing a post office.
federal facility
4. Loretta is free on parole.
local county jail
In this type of negligence, both parties are found to be equally at fault and therefore neither side can recover damages.
Answer:
Until relatively recently, tort was one of the areas on Corporate and Business Law that caused candidates the most difficulty. In recent sessions, the tort answers have tended to be stronger, but there is also evidence of some confusion between tort and contract, with negligence-based material frequently arising in answers to contract questions.
HURRY PLS
identify reasons critics object to the emphasis the United States puts on individual rights
Answer:
Government And Business in Voice for Reason
Explanation:
Which of the following limits the power of a government?
Allowing one leader to make all of the laws
Not allowing public elections
Allowing one leader to make all economic decisions
Setting up a system of checks and balances
It is against the law to pass when your view of the road ahead is obstructed and when you are within _____ feet of a bridge, viaduct, or tunnel. A. 100.B. 150. C. 200. D. 300.
It is against the law to pass when your view of the road ahead is obstructed and when you are within 100 feet of a bridge, viaduct, or tunnel. The correct option is A.
A bridge is a structure that spans a gap and connects two points, such as a body of water, valley, or road, to allow for transportation or passage. Arch, beam, truss, and suspension are some of the most common bridge styles.There are several types of bridges and each is defined by its features. The types of bridges are listed below:Arch bridgesBeam bridgesTruss bridgesSuspension bridgesCable-stayed bridgesA viaduct is a bridge-like structure that spans a valley or a gorge and carries a road or a railway over a broad or a deep ravine, a valley, or a gorge. It can be made up of arches or a series of supporting columns that span the entire valley floor. They're often used in hilly or mountainous areas where it's impossible to create a straight road.A tunnel is an underground passage or tube that is frequently constructed for transportation, water, sewage, or utilities. It may also be used for aesthetic or military purposes. When tunneling through soft materials like clay or sand, digging is used, while when tunneling through tougher materials like stone, miners or tunnel-boring machines are used.A law is a set of rules and regulations that are established by the government to govern and regulate the conduct of citizens within their jurisdiction. It is a binding legal contract that citizens are required to follow. Failure to follow the law results in legal consequences.Therefore, the correct option is A. 100.Learn more about jurisdiction: https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ11
why did senator edmund ross vote not guilty in the impeachment trial of andrew johnson?
One of the possible reasons why Edmund Ross voted not guilty in the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson for fears of losing political power in case of re-election.
Ross is best known for giving the deciding vote that acquitted Andrew Johnson during his impeachment trial in 1868.
The trial involved two significant constitutional questions. One reason was that some people questioned whether the Tenure of Office Ac was constitutional. The other issue was that the Constitution at the time did not define who became vice president if the president died or was unable to serve.
If Johnson had been impeached, Senate President Pro Tempore Benjamin Wade would have taken over until the following election. Wade had his own detractors within the Republican Party, including Ross (who feared Wade would strip him of his patronage powers in Kansas if he became president)
To know more about impeachment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1411922
#SPJ4
the rule of law is when a society enforces property rights, contracts, and other rules according to an established and uniform set of laws instead of arbitrary decisions. (true or false)
The rule of law refers to the principle that all individuals and institutions are subject to and accountable to the law, which is fairly and consistently applied and enforced. given statement is true.
It means that a society enforces property rights, contracts, and other rules according to an established and uniform set of laws instead of arbitrary decisions. This concept is central to the functioning of a democratic society and is essential for protecting individual rights and promoting social and economic stability.
For such more question on federal law
https://brainly.com/question/30710747
#SPJ4
Rich and Archie sign an agreement in which Archie agrees to deliver ten cases of champagne in 5 days. The parties negotiated and meant to say in the written agreement, delivery in 50 days. If the evidence is clear that the two parties intended to agree to 50 days, the courts will probably
Answer:
Reform the contract
Explanation:
Contract reformation means that both parties, in this case, Rich and Archie, ask the courts to rewrite the contract or make a change in a specific part of the contract to express what both of the parties want. Then, Rich and Archie would agree that Archie has to deliver ten cases of champagne in 50 days, not 5.
where do we go after we die?
Answer: We all go underground but what you think you might go in the afterlife or after death is entirely up to your belief.
Answer:
What happened to everyone who was here? And when we die I would hope to say we go to purgatory which is like waiting to get into heaven ...
Explanation:
TOPIC
You are assigned to a walking beat downtown, and every
morning you stop into a breakfast shop and have a cup of
coffee only. The owner does not charge you. After some
citizen complaints about the parking situation in the area,
the station has directed you to ticket all illegally parked
cars. As you are tagging the cars in front of the breakfast
shop, the owner comes out furious and asks what are you
doing? He states rather loudly, "I give you free coffee every
day and this is how you repay me"?
• How would you respond?
•
• Was there an implied consent that the free coffee
would be reimbursed by granting favors to the owner?
On a larger scale, could this lead to a perception of
corruption of the officer looked the other way or
warned customers that if they were parked illegally
and didn't move their cars they would be ticketed?
• What would be a solution to this issue?
In this case, I would respond by saying that giving free breakfast can be considered as a generous effort by the shop owner but it can never mean an implied consent for grant of favors.
Moreover, this could very well be perceived as corruption by the officers as they leave people without tickets despite illegally parking the vehicles and the grant of favors like the shop owner would also amount to bribery and corruption.
A viable solution to issue would be to make a rule to post proper advertisements about the penalty for illegal parking should be done. These advertisements would act as awareness as well as warning for people and then officers don't need to be lenient on people who still break the rules. This way, the issue of corruption allegations and illegal parking both can be resolved together.
To know more about Corruption:
brainly.com/question/15270178
#SPJ1
Government by the people is taken to mean government by the people operating through competing interest groups in the ___________ model of democracy
Government by the people is taken to mean government by the people operating through competing interest groups in the pluralist model of democracy.
Pluralist democracy is a democratic form in which no single group dominates politics and organised groups struggle to influence policy.
At both the state and federal levels, we have evidence of pluralist democracy. Anyone can engage in influencing political decisions, just as in a participatory democracy, but in a pluralist democracy, individuals work through groups organised around common causes.
Pluralist democracy theorists claim that people self-select the causes they want to devote their time to and then support those causes. These groups then compete for the favour of prominent politicians who will campaign for their causes.
To know more about pluralist democracy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29640948
#SPJ4
the chapter starts out with gideon v. wainwright, clarence gideon was a fifty-one year old man accused of stealing change from a poolroom in panama city. he could not afford to pay an attorney, he therefore was not able to have representation in the courtroom. in the process of his trial gideon requested that an attorney be provided and he was denied by the judge. while gideon was incarcerated he mailed a petition to the supreme court and changed history. the supreme court ruled in his favor.
The chapter starts out with Gideon v. Wainwright, Clarence Gideon was a fifty-one-year-old man accused of stealing change from a poolroom in Panama City.
He could not afford to pay an attorney; he, therefore, was not able to have representation in the courtroom. In the process of his trial, Gideon requested that an attorney be provided, and he was denied by the judge. While Gideon was incarcerated, he mailed a petition to the Supreme Court and changed history. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor.The Gideon v. Wainwright case refers to a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court that mandated states to provide counsel to criminal defendants who were unable to afford legal representation on their own. The ruling was delivered on March 18, 1963. Clarence Earl Gideon was a poor Florida man who was charged with stealing wine and money from a pool hall in June 1961.
Gideon requested an attorney during his trial but was denied, and the court found him guilty and sentenced him to five years in prison. Clarence Gideon sent a handwritten letter to the Supreme Court from his cell, and his case was taken up by a legal team.
To know more about Clarence Gideon visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32445231
#SPJ11
HELP! FOR LAW STUDIES. 100 POINTS!!!
"The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."
—Patrick Henry
From what you know about the Constitution, do you agree with Patrick Henry's statement? Why or why not?
Patrick Henry was a leader of the Anti-Federalists. How does this quote support their position on the Constitution?
How does Henry's statement reflect the idea of social contract? How does the idea of social contract protect people's natural and individual rights?
What is the current ruling on drug testing minors in public schools? Do you agree or disagree?
Answer:The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."—Patrick Henry1.
Explanation:
all contract are agreement but not all agreement are contract discuss
QUESTION 2 "So, the Advocate Dali Mpofu is correct, we can afford free education for all South African children. But where I come from, I do not jubilate at free education, I want to revisit the curriculum; I want to know which publishing companies benefit from the education of our children, where they come from and what their philosophy of education is". Moss Mashamaite (2014). (a) Discuss the above extract with reference to Freire's views on education. (6)
According to the above extract Freire's views on education can be summed up as-
For Freire, education is never neutral. All education is political – either educating to support and maintain the status quo or helping to critique and change reality. Problem-posing education does not and cannot serve the interests of the oppressor.
Education mean today?Education is defined as a cycle of learning that helps a person acquire and understand more complex stuff. According to the training they have received, the knowledge that has been had about a person provides an example of thought and behavior.
The renowned definition of education?Education is an intentional process with certain goals in mind, such as information transmission or the development of abilities and moral character. The growth of comprehension, reason, compassion, and honesty are only a few examples of these objectives.
To know more about Education visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18023991
#SPJ1
removing existing barriers when readily achievable in public buildings, such as adding braille markings to elevator buttons, is a requirement of which law?
A limited use/limited application elevator, or LULA, is smaller and moves more slowly than a typical passenger elevator found in a large commercial structure.
According to Meihls, LULAs are made for limited capacity and normally only carry passengers up one or two storeys. Churches, schools, libraries, and small businesses frequently have them.In order to increase accessibility in already-existing structures, LULAs can also be installed. In order to be in compliance with the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (the most recent revision), your building must be altered, renovated, or expanded to remove "accessibility barriers in existing places of public accommodation when doing so is readily achievable."
learn more about LULA here:
https://brainly.com/question/17144835
#SPJ4
Formal authority is
A. an established organization, especially one providing a public service.
B. the ability to cause others to behave as they might not otherwise choose
to do.
C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
the process and method of making decisions for groups.
Answer: C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
Explanation:
Formal authority is the power that is given to a leader by an organization.
what is the maximum fine that can be levied for committing a felony?
A felony is an offense which when is declared and proven beyond reasonable by a jury of their respective peers to be a felony or, if not declared to be a misdemeanor, is punishable, without proof of previous conviction, with death, or with imprisonment for three years or more penalties however vary from states to states.
Penalties for a California Felony Conviction for instance include imprisonment in a state prison or county jail, and a fine up to $10,000. However, the judge has the discretion to sentence a defendant to formal felony probation.
Consider learning more about civil cases here
https://brainly.com/question/12868966
#SPJ4
Briefly describe the lawsuit. Be sure to identify the compliance issue that led to the lawsuit and note the protected class or classes that were affected.
Explanation:
perturbateur ( le temps, le lieu, les personnages[description], la victime, l'enqueteur )
les peripeties
le denouement
Zippers, Corp., a development company, has constructed a zip-line course on government land after signing a leasing agreement with the state government. A few years after signing the agreement, the state authority sanctioned the Never-ending Tunnel Company to build a long tunnel through the land where the zip-line course already exists. The proprietors of Zippers, Corp. claim that the state authority has violated their existing agreement. Which of the following is most likely to be applied in this case between Zippers, Corp. and the state government?
A) the doctrine of preemption
B) the free exercise clause
C) the contract clause
D) the establishment clause
E) the commerce clause (has to do with fed gov... we k it can't be the answer to this q bc this q doesn't have to do with fed gov)
The most likely applicable clause in this case between Zippers, Corp., and the state government is the Contract Clause. Thus, option c is correct.
The Contract Clause is a clause in Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, which forbids states from violating or terminating contracts made by individuals or corporations.
The Contract Clause states that no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. This clause is aimed at preventing state governments from passing laws that would interfere with private contracts' performance.
The Contract Clause applies to public contracts, such as those signed by state or local governments with private contractors or public-sector workers, as well as private contracts.
This clause states that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. Thus, the option c contract clause best describes the case.
Learn more about Contract Clause here:
brainly.com/question/25697446
#SPJ11
Pat and Terry are eligible for which of the following credits?
Answer:
List the following credits?
Explanation:
List the following credits?
As a consultant for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, you have been hired to complete a site selection report. The Y is currently looking at 3 different locations and they have asked you to prioritize them. Discuss, in detail, the steps (discussed in your textbook) that you would take to complete this report. Use relevant examples form the Edmond area.
To complete the site selection report for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, I would follow several steps outlined in the textbook. These steps include conducting a feasibility study, analyzing the site characteristics, assessing community needs, and evaluating potential risks and benefits.
Feasibility Study: I would begin by conducting a feasibility study for each location under consideration. This study would involve analyzing factors such as demographics, market demand, competition, and economic indicators. For example, I would examine the population growth rate in the Edmond area, income levels, and trends in health and fitness participation.
Site Characteristics: Next, I would analyze the specific characteristics of each location. This would include evaluating factors such as size, accessibility, visibility, zoning regulations, infrastructure, and proximity to amenities. For instance, I would assess the available parking space, the ease of transportation access, and the visibility of each location from major roads.
Community Needs: It is crucial to assess the community's needs to ensure the YMCA can effectively serve the target population. This would involve conducting surveys, interviews, or focus groups with residents to gather information on their preferences and expectations. Additionally, I would research existing community facilities and programs to identify any gaps or opportunities for the YMCA to address.
Risk and Benefit Analysis: To evaluate potential risks and benefits, I would consider factors like operational costs, revenue potential, environmental impact, and potential partnerships. For example, I would assess the cost of acquiring or leasing each location, ongoing maintenance expenses, and the revenue-generating potential through membership fees or program offerings. Additionally, I would evaluate the potential for collaborations with schools, healthcare providers, or local businesses.
By following these steps, the site selection report would provide a comprehensive analysis of each location's suitability for the YMCA in Edmond. It would prioritize the locations based on their alignment with the community's needs, financial viability, and overall potential for success.
For more questions on feasibility study
https://brainly.com/question/30985089
#SPJ8
in an emergency situation, lori render said to mike, who needs help. mike would most likely be prohibited from suing lori for negligence under:
In an emergency situation, Lori Render said to Mike, "who needs help." If Mike was injured while receiving help from Lori, he would most likely be prohibited from suing her for negligence under the Good Samaritan laws.
Good Samaritan laws are laws that protect individuals who provide assistance to those who are injured or in danger from being sued for negligence. These laws vary by state, but they are generally designed to encourage people to provide assistance without fear of legal repercussions. However, there are limitations to Good Samaritan laws, and they do not provide blanket immunity from all types of lawsuits. For example, if Lori acted with gross negligence or intentional misconduct, she could still be held liable for any harm caused to Mike.The legal concept that may apply to Lori Render's actions is called "Good Samaritan" laws. These laws are intended to protect individuals who voluntarily provide assistance to those in need during emergency situations from being sued for negligence.
Learn more about emergency situations here:
https://brainly.com/question/31109378
#SPJ11
6
What is one reason that, in modern times, it would be very difficult for Congress to overturn a president's veto?
ОА.
The Supreme Court is likely to intervene, sustaining the veto.
OB.
It's hard to get 2/3 of Congress to agree on anything.
O c.
Congress meets for too short a time to debate a veto.
OD
The Supremacy Doctrine gives the executive branch too much power.
Answer:
i think it a
Explanation:
The ______ Clause of the First Amendment protects the rights of citizens to petition the government for change and to peacefully assemble.
The "Petition" Clause of the First Amendment protects the rights of citizens to petition the government for change and to peacefully assemble.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees several fundamental freedoms, including freedom of speech, religion, the press, and the right to peacefully assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.
The Petition Clause specifically safeguards the right of individuals and groups to address the government, voice their concerns, and seek changes in public policy. It enables citizens to formally request action, express their opinions, and engage with government officials through written or oral means.
The right to peacefully assemble is also protected by the First Amendment. This guarantees the freedom of individuals to gather together, whether in public or private spaces, for expressive purposes, political activities, or to advocate for particular causes or concerns.
These rights are essential components of a democratic society, fostering civic engagement and allowing citizens to have a voice in shaping government policies and decisions.
Learn more about Petition here
https://brainly.com/question/32455266
#SPJ11
1. The economic cost nationwide of alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes annually is between __________ billion dollars.
A. 15 and 20
B. 25 and 30
C. 35 and 40
D. 50 and 55
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It's actually 44 billion but the answer you put says 40, so go with 35 and 40.
What is the main component of a fingerprint left on the surface of a clean glass slide?
Sweat secretions that have been transferred to a surface and formed into a fingerprint imprint or ridge pattern are known as fingerprints.
On non-porous glossy surfaces like glass, plastic, and polished metals, Super Glue Vaporization is utilised to leave a latent mark. Cyanoacrylate smoking is a physical act, similar to dusting. Sweat is expelled by a network of pores found in each skin ridge. When your fingertips brush the surface, the combination of these bumps and sweat forms fingerprints. Each skin ridge contains a row of sweat-releasing pores. When the finger makes contact with a surface, the combination of these ridges and the sweat results in the formation of a fingerprint.
Know more about the fingerprints at: https://brainly.com/question/15221897
#SPJ4
Agent Alice has received an offer that she believes is not in the sellers’ best interest. What should Alice do?
Answer:
Make no recommendations and let the sellers decide on their own. Tell the sellers exactly how she feels and why she thinks the offer is not a good one.
Alice should make no recommendations and let the sellers decide on their own.
The above is an example of agent-seller relationship. Although, the seller had contracted the right to sell to an agent; he must allow the sellers decide on their own whether or not to sell if such will not favor them.
This is important because any loss on sale made by an agent on behalf of a seller, which is not in the seller's best interest will be solely borne by the agent.
While the agent is empowered to act on behalf of the seller , he or she must at all times act in the best interest of the sellers.
It therefore means that Alice should make no recommendations and let the sellers decide on their own.
Learn more about agent-seller relationship here : https://brainly.com/question/25305843
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.