HELP please!!!!!!!!!!!
​

Answer:

24%

Step-by-step explanation:

trust me and get blessed

The probability of drawing a card that could win the hand and actually winning the hand is 12%.

Option B is the correct answer.

It is the chance of an event to occur from a total number of outcomes.

The formula for probability is given as:

Probability = Number of required events / Total number of outcomes.

Example:

The probability of getting a head in tossing a coin.

P(H) = 1/2

We have,

There are 50 cards left in the deck after the 5 of spades and 10 of clubs are drawn since there are 4 suits with 13 cards each, and 2 of those cards have already been drawn.

Out of the remaining 50 cards, there are 16 cards that could win the hand: the 9 remaining cards higher than the 10 of clubs in any suit, and the 6 remaining cards in the spade suit (since the 5 of spades is already on the table).

Therefore, the probability of drawing a card that could win the hand is 16/50, which simplifies to 8/25. This is approximately 0.32 or 32%.

However, we need to subtract the probability of drawing the 5 of clubs, 10 of spades, or any of the 8 remaining cards that would not win the hand.

The probability of drawing one of these cards is 10/50, which simplifies to 1/5 or 20%.

The probability of drawing a card that could win the hand and actually winning the hand is:

(16/50) x (1/5)

= 0.32 - 0.2

= 0.12 or 12%.

Thus,

The probability of drawing a card that could win the hand and actually winning the hand is 12%.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/14099682

#SPJ2

Answer:

I do not have access to Annexure A and Annexure B, so I cannot collect the data, draw the frequency table or pie chart, or answer the last question. However, I can provide a general explanation of how to calculate the mean, mode, median, and range from a set of data.

To find the mean (average) of a set of data, add up all the values in the set and divide by the number of values. For example, if the maximum temperatures of the 30 days are:

25, 28, 29, 27, 26, 30, 31, 32, 29, 27, 26, 24, 23, 25, 28, 30, 32, 33, 34, 31, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 21, 20, 22

The sum of the values is:

25 + 28 + 29 + 27 + 26 + 30 + 31 + 32 + 29 + 27 + 26 + 24 + 23 + 25 + 28 + 30 + 32 + 33 + 34 + 31 + 29 + 28 + 27 + 26 + 25 + 24 + 23 + 21 + 20 + 22 = 813

Dividing by the number of values (30), we get:

Mean = 813/30 = 27.1

To find the mode of a set of data, identify the value that occurs most frequently. In this example, there are two values that occur most frequently, 27 and 29, so the data has two modes.

To find the median of a set of data, arrange the values in order from smallest to largest and find the middle value. If there are an even number of values, take the mean of the two middle values. In this example, the values in ascending order are:

20, 21, 22, 23, 23, 24, 24, 25, 25, 26, 26, 27, 27, 27, 28, 28, 29, 29, 29, 30, 30, 31, 31, 32, 32, 33, 34

There are 30 values, so the median is the 15th value, which is 28.

To find the range of a set of data, subtract the smallest value from the largest value. In this example, the smallest value is 20 and the largest value is 34, so the range is:

Range = 34 - 20 = 14

To create a frequency table for the maximum temperature data, we need to group the data into intervals and count the number of values that fall into each interval. For example, we could use the following intervals:

20-24, 25-29, 30-34

The frequency table would look like this:

Interval | Frequency

20-24 | 4

25-29 | 18

30-34 | 8

To calculate the size of the angles for the pie chart, we need to find the total frequency (30) and divide 360° by the total frequency to get the proportion of each interval in degrees. For example, for the interval 25-29:

Proportion = Frequency/Total frequency = 18/30 = 0.6

Angle = Proportion * 360° = 0.6 * 360° = 216°

We can repeat this calculation for each interval to obtain the angles for the pie chart.

In terms of the last question, it is not clear what is meant by "which data collection best describe the maximum and why?". If you could provide more context or clarification, I would be happy to try to help.

Answer:  the longest poster that could fit in the box is approximately 22.56 inches long.

Step-by-step explanation: Utilizing the Pythagorean theorem, able to calculate the corner to corner as takes after:

diagonal^2 = 11^2 + 18^2 + 8^2

diagonal^2 = 121 + 324 + 64

diagonal^2 = 509

inclining = sqrt(509)

corner to corner ≈ 22.56 inches

The radius of the semicircle protractor is approximately 4.693 cm.

Given,Perimeter of a semicircle protractor = 14.8 cm.

To find:The radius of a semicircle protractor.Solution:We know that the perimeter of a semicircle protractor is the sum of the straight edge of a protractor and half of the circumference of the circle whose radius is the radius of the protractor.

Circumference of a circle = 2πrWhere, r is the radius of the circle.If the radius of the semicircle protractor is r, then Perimeter of a semicircle protractor = r + πr [∵ half of the circumference of a circle =\((1/2) × 2πr = πr]14.8 = r + πr14.8 = r(1 + π) r = 14.8 / (1 + π)r ≈ 4.693\) cm.

for more questions on semicircle protractor

https://brainly.com/question/30188078

#SPJ8

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

We can divide 76,450 shavings by the average shavings per pencil, 5,425 to get an answer of 14.09... This can be rounded to 14.

Alternate interior angles are congruent if parallel lines are crossed by a transversal.

In congruent geometry, the shapes that are so identical. can be superimposed on themselves.

Here,
A figure has been shown below,
Where there is 2 parallel line intersected by a transversal line.
The measure of the alternate angle [besides interior and exterior angle], their measure are equal to corresponding angles as well as with alternate angles. As shown in the figure.

Thus, alternate interior angles are congruent if parallel lines are crossed by a transversal.

Learn more about congruent geometry here. https://brainly.com/question/12413243

#SPJ1

The measure of distance x, that is, the distance between a point P and the point of horizon, is equal to 284.372 miles.

In this problem we must determine the distance between a point P located about earth's circumference and the point of horizon, located on earth's circumference. Since the line between these two points is tangent to earth, then, distance x can be found by Pythagorean theorem:

x = √[(3959 mi + 10.2 mi)² - (3959 mi)²]

x = 284.372 mi

The distance x is equal to 284.372 miles.

To learn more on Pythagorean theorem: https://brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ1

The calculated value of the expression 2x - y for the given values of x and y is 9/2.

We are given that 2x = 7 and 2y = 5, and we are asked to find the value of 2x - y.

This means that

x = 7/2 and y = 5/2

We can start by substituting the given values into the expression:

2x - y = 2(7/2) - (5/2)

Notice that since 2x = 7, then x = 7/2.

Similarly, since 2y = 5, then y = 5/2. Substituting these values into the expression, we get:

2x - y = 2(7/2) - (5/2) = 7 - 5/2 = 9/2

Therefore, the value of 2x - y is 9/2.

Read more about expression at

https://brainly.com/question/15775046

#SPJ1

By using the formula for the distance we will see that the correct option is B:

√52

We will use the general formula to find the distance between two points (a, b) and (c, d)

it is:

distance = √( (a - c)^2 + (b - d)^2)

Here we want to find the distance between the points (-2,-3) and (4,1), if we use the above formula we will get:

distance = √( (-2 - 4)^2 + (-3 - 1)^2) = √( 36 + 16)

distance = √52

The correct option is B.

Learn more about the distance between two points:

https://brainly.com/question/7243416

#SPJ1

Answer:

Null hypothesis H0: p = 0.01

Alternative hypothesis Ha: p < 0.01

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis (H0) tries to show that no significant variation exists between variables or that a single variable is no different than its mean. While an alternative Hypothesis (Ha) attempt to prove that a new theory is true rather than the old one. That a variable is significantly different from the mean.

For the case above;

The null hypothesis is that the proportion of people with colon polyps expected to die from colon cancer remains 0.01 with or without colonoscopy.

H0: p = 0.01

The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of people who die from colon cancer after having polyps removed in a colonoscopy is significantly less than the expected proportion (without a colonoscopy) of 0.01.

Ha: p < 0.01

The images best represents the result is image W.

We have, the image is rotated about the x-axis.

Now, rotating around x axis can give the other half of the image.

Also, rotating about x axis gives the mirror image of the figure.

So, the rotation leads to a circle.

and, In three dimensional we can say that Sphere.

Thus, the required image is W.

Learn more about Rotation here:

https://brainly.com/question/1571997

#SPJ1

The scale of the map is 1/10,000.

The formula used to find the formula to find the scale is

scale = length on the map / actual length

Given,

Actual length of the golf park = 2.5 km

length on map = 250 mm

Here, we need to convert both lengths into the same units

2.5 km = 2.5 x 1000 m/km x 1000 mm/m = 2,500,000 mm

we know that,

scale = length on the map / actual length

= 250 mm / 2,500,000 mm

= 1/10,000.

Therefore, the scale of the map is 1/10,000.

i.e, one unit on the map is equal to 10,000 units of length in reality.

To learn more about, Length calculation on maps

https://brainly.com/question/16529065

The remark in the problem is the statement that the forces can be associated with potential energies is explained as follows: the work from x=3.00m to x=2.00m is

W=F₂ Δx=(5.00N)(−1.00m)=−5.00J,

so the potential energy at x=2.00m is U₂=+5.00J.

(b Now, we should evident from the problem statement that Emax =14.0J, so the kinetic energy at x=2.00m is the kinetic energy at x=2.00m is

K₂=Emax−U₂=14.0−5.00=9.00J.

(c) the work from x=2.00m to x=0 is W=F₁Δx=(3.00N)(−2.00m)=−6.00J, so the potential energy at x=0 is

U₀=6.00J+U₂=(6.00+5.00)J=11.0J.

(d) Similar to reasoning presented in part (a) then gives

K₀=Emax−U₀=(14.0−11.0)J=3.00J.

(e) The work from x=8.00m to x=11.0m is

W=F₃Δx=(−4.00N)(3.00m)=−12.0J,

so the potential energy at x=11.0m is U₁₁=12.0J.

(f) The kinetic energy at x=11.0m is therefore

K₁₁=Emax−U₁₁=(14.0−12.0)J=2.00J.

(g) Now we have W=F₄Δx=(−1.00N)(1.00m)=−1.00J, so the potential energy at x=12.0m is

U₁₂=1.00J+U₁₁=(1.00+12.0)J=13.0J.

(h) Thus, the kinetic energy at x=12.0m is

K₁₂=Emax−U₁₂=(14.0−13.0)=1.00J.

(i) T There is no work done in the interval of x=12.0m to x=13.0m so the answers are the same as in part (g): U₁₂=13.0J.

.(j) In this also there is no work done in this interval so the answers are the same as in part (h): K₁₂=1.00J.

(k)  Although the plot is not shown here, it would look like a “potential well” with piecewise-sloping sides: from x=0 to x=2 the graph of U is decreased from the line segment with 11 to 5, and from x=2 to x=3

it may be headed down to zero, where it stays until x=8, where it starts to increase to a value of 12 at which x=11, and in another positive-slope line segment it increased to the value of 13 at x=12.

For x>12 it is a value that does not change.

(l) The particle can be thought of as “falling” down the 0<x<3  slopes of the well, gaining kinetic energy as it does so, and certainly is able to reach x=5. Since U=0 at x=5, then its initial potential energy (11J) has completely converted to kinetic: now K=11.0J.

(m) This is not sufficient to climb up and out of the well on the large x side (x>8), but does allow it to reach a “height” of 11 at x=10.8m. As discussed in sections 8−5, this is a “turning point” of the motion.

(n) Next it “falls” back down and rises back up the small x slope until it comes back to its original position. Stating this more carefully, when it is stopped at x=10.8m it is accelerated to the left by the force  F₃.

it gains enough speed as a result that it eventually is able to return to x=0, where it stops again.

To know more about Potential Energy:

https://brainly.com/question/18524724

#SPJ4

Answer:

34p -8

Step-by-step explanation:

6 (4p- 2) + 2 (5p + 2)

24p - 12 + 2 (5p +2)

24p - 12 + 10p + 4

34p -8

Check the picture below.

so the hexagonal prism is really just a hexagon with six 8x27 rectangles, let's simply get the area of all and sum them up.

\(\textit{area of a regular polygon}\\\\ A=\cfrac{1}{2}ap ~~ \begin{cases} p=perimeter\\ a=apothem\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ p=\stackrel{8\times 6}{48}\\ a=6.9 \end{cases}\implies A=\cfrac{1}{2}(6.9)(48)\implies A=165.6 \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{ \textit{\LARGE Areas} }{\stackrel{ \textit{six rectangles} }{(6)(8)(27)}~~ + ~~\stackrel{ \textit{hexgonal face} }{165.6}}\implies 1296+165.6\implies \text{\LARGE 1461.6}~in^2\)

Step-by-step explanation:

U2 = 7

U1 = 35/2

r = 7 ÷ 35/2

r = 7 × 2/35

r = 14/35

r = 2/5

#7

Common ratio

#8

As per slope intercept form 8795 is the y inetercept .

Here its

Answer: 384.85

Step-by-step explanation

The expected total dollar net operating Income for next year = $70,000

1) The contribution format income statement for the game last year, and the degree of operating leverage is computed below:

Contribution format income statement for the game last year Sales (15,000 × $20) = $300,000

Variable expenses (15,000 × $6) = $90,000

Contribution margin = $210,000

Fixed expenses = $182,000Net operating income = $28,000

Degree of operating leverage = Contribution margin / Net operating income= $210,000 / $28,000= 7.5 2)

The expected percentage increase in net operating income for next year:

The expected sales in next year = 18,000

games selling price per game = $20

Therefore, Total sales revenue = 18,000 × $20 = $360,000

Variable expenses = 18,000 × $6 = $108,000

Fixed expenses = $182,000

Expected net operating income = Total sales revenue – Variable expenses – Fixed expenses

= $360,000 – $108,000 – $182,000= $70,000

The expected percentage increase in net operating income = (Expected net operating income - Last year's net operating income) / Last year's net operating income*100= ($70,000 - $28,000) / $28,000*100= 150%

The expected total dollar net operating income for next year = $70,000

To know more about Income.

https://brainly.com/question/30467914

#SPJ8

A Gallup poll conducted in April found that 55% of Americans believe driverless cars will be common in the next 10 years, as presented in a histogram showing the percentage of responses in different time intervals.

A Gallup Poll was conducted in April that surveyed adults aged 18 or older to gauge their perceptions on when fully automated "driverless cars" will be commonly used in the United States.

The question asked was "how soon do you think driverless cars will be commonly used in the United States?" The survey indicated that 55% of Americans believe that driverless cars will be common in the next 10 years.

The results of the survey were presented in a histogram, showing the percentage of responses in different time intervals, which means it shows how many people responded within a certain time frame (e.g. within 5 years, within 10 years, etc.) when they think driverless cars will be commonly used.

This poll gives an insight into how people perceive the future of driverless cars and how soon they think it will become a common sight on the roads.

To learn more about driverless cars at

https://brainly.com/question/11345370?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The question is -

A Gallup Poll utilizing a random sample of adults ages or older was conducted in April. The survey indicated a majority of Americans () say driverless cars will be common in the next years (). The question asked was: Thinking about fully automated, "driverless cars," cars that use technology to drive and do not need a human driver, based on what you have heard or read, how soon do you think driverless cars will be commonly used in the [United States]? The figure below shows a summary of the results of the survey in a histogram indicating the percentage of the total responses in different time intervals.

Answer: 96ft³

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

96 ft³

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume = w × l × h

= 4 × 8 × 3

= 96 ft³

Answer:

25/36

Step-by-step explanation:

put 2500 over 3600 and remove the 0's to simplify it

Answer:

4.2.1)  R140 000

4.2.2)  R144 758.28

4.2.3)  Option 2

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the return on Ayanda's investment using Option 1, we can use the simple interest formula.

\(\boxed{\begin{minipage}{7 cm}\underline{Simple Interest Formula}\\\\$ I =Prt$\\\\where:\\\\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $I =$ interest accrued \\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $P =$ principal amount \\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $r =$ interest rate (in decimal form) \\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $t =$ time (in years) \\ \end{minipage}}\)

Given values:

Substitute the given values into the formula and solve for I:

\(I=200000 \cdot 0.12 \cdot 6\)

\(I=24000 \cdot 6\)

\(I=144000\)

Therefore, the return on Ayanda's investment using Option 1 is R144000.

\(\hrulefill\)

To calculate the return on Ayanda's investment using Option 2, we can use the compound interest formula.

\(\boxed{\begin{minipage}{7 cm}\underline{Annual Compound Interest Formula}\\\\$ I=P\left(1+r\right)^{t}-P$\\\\where:\\\\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $I =$ interest accrued \\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $P =$ principal amount \\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $r =$ interest rate (in decimal form) \\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $t =$ time (in years) \\ \end{minipage}}\)

Given values:

Substitute the given values into the formula and solve for I:

\(I=200000(1+0.095)^6-200000\)

\(I=200000(1.095)^6-200000\)

\(I=200000(1.72379142...)-200000\)

\(I=344758.28426...-200000\)

\(I=144758.28426...\)

\(I=144758.28\)

Therefore, the return on Ayanda's investment using Option 2 is R144758.28.

\(\hrulefill\)

Comparing the returns from both options, we find that Option 1 offers a return of R144000, while Option 2 offers a return of R144758.28. As R144758.28 > R144000, then Option 2 will render the most money for Ayanda's investment.

Answer:

Answer attached in images below.

a) The distance from point P to the pole  is: 6.2 m

b) The height of the Pole is: 6.2 m

The triangle attached shows us the triangle formed as a result of the given word problem about angle of elevation and distance and height.

Now, we are given that:

The angle of elevation of the top of the pole =  45°

Angle of elevation of the top of the pole = 58°.

|PQ|= 10m

a) PR is distance from point P to the pole and using trigonometric ratios, gives us:

PR/sin 58 = 10/sin(180 - 58 - 45)

PR/sin 58 = 10/sin 77

PR = (10 * sin 58)/sin 77

PR = 8.7 m

b) P O can be calculated with trigonometric ratios as:

P O = PR * cos 45

P O = 8.7 * 0.7071

P O = 6.2 m

Now, the two sides of the isosceles triangle formed are equal and as such:

R O = P O

Thus, height of pole R O = 6.2 m

Read more about distance from angle of elevation at: https://brainly.com/question/25748640

#SPJ1

Answer:

45 is answer I guess cuz my teacher taught me just like that

well what i got was:

the exact form: 233/28

decimal form: 7.96428571...

mixed number form: 7 27/28

not sure if this is right at all but i hope it helps at least a little

hi

1/7 * (56 -1/4) =   56/7 - 1/28  =   224/28 - 1/28 =  223 /28  

as 223 is  prime, it's cannot be simplified.   however  it 7 +27/28

Answer:

pretty sure its d

Step-by-step explanation: