Answer:
parking violation
Explanation:
Parking violation is a wrongful act where it is not permitted by the law of California to park the vehicle anywhere on the road. It is illegal to park the vehicle in a restricted place or to park in unauthorized manner.
Many people violate this law and is held by the law enforcement officers for parking in some restricted place.
Thus the call for service is parking violation that is very common in Long Beach, California.
Interview Question Legal Illegal How many times a month were you late for work at your last job? Do you have any mental illnesses? What year did you graduate from high school? Did you graduate from high school?
Answer:
Legal and Illegal Interview Questions:
Legal:
How many times a month were you late for work at your last job?
Did you graduate from high school?
Illegal:
Do you have any mental illnesses?
What year did you graduate from high school?
Explanation:
Employers of labor should be aware of some interview questions, which are deemed legal, and some others that may be deemed illegal to ask job candidates. For this reason, employers should be careful to ensure they play by the rules. The illegal questions are considered so because they tend to exacerbate discrimination. Examples of interview questions that are deemed illegal are questions relating to age. Others include questions about marital status and parental status. Some other illegal questions relate to citizenship status, mental illness status, religious affiliations, and race or skin color.
What does a traffic control officer do
Answer:
Summary of Duties: A Traffic Officer patrols an assigned area on foot, bicycle, or in a vehicle to enforce motor vehicle parking regulations; issues warnings or citations for illegal parking by entering information into a hand-held computer; impounds vehicles; and directs vehicular and pedestrian traffic at a specific
Explanation:
Answer:
they control traffic
Explanation:
they tell when the cars go and when the stop
Can someone please define all of these?
Criminal Law
Civil Law
Military Law
Administrative Law
Constitutional and Case Law
Answer:
Skip to main content
Search...
5926008663
04/14/2021
Law
College
Can someone please define all of these?
Criminal Law
Civil Law
Military Law
Administrative Law
Constitutional and Case Law
Your answer
(quit)
estabillodustineBeginner
Answer:
Explanation:
ADD YOUR ANSWER
Ask 5926008663 about this question...
New questions in Law
do you know that there is a consumer prodection laws? mention three provision of the law.
what is name one of your teacher
What have you learned about studying Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women? Please help me on my report. Ps. Ur …
21. Who will be at fault if you hit a person getting out of a parked car? A. Nobody, because it is hard to see people getting out of cars. B. The pers…
18. Which technique provides a smooth transition from acceleration to braking? A. Skid braking B. Cover braking C. Squeeze braking D. Gentle braking
Now that you have listened to the first chapter of Common Sense, what do you think of Paine's philosophy? Particularly, what do think about how he vie…
Flashing blue lights are prohibited as their use is strictly reserved for which of these?
Flashing blue lights are prohibited as their use is strictly reserved for which of these?
Discuss what traits successful law enforcement leaders have. If you had to select one most important characteristic of a law enforcement leader, expla…
3. How can it be said that courts adjudicate the allocation of the costs of a consumer-oriented economy?
In a wrongful death action for the death of his wife in an automobile accident, the plaintiff alleged that the accident was caused by a mudflap assemb…
Who must be properly licensed and receive general awareness/familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazmat
what are the elements of access control
As permitted by state law, a large city in the state adopted an ordinance legalizing slot machines in shopping malls within the city. Several prominen…
Find and summarise the case of national director of public prosecutions v botha (cct 280/18) 2020 ZACC 06 in the prescribed format
Ram has just sold his share in a company and decided to buy a new car for his wife. On 15 April 2019, Ram appointed Gan as his agent to buy a car at t…
Ba lần phân công lao động nguyên nhân gián tiếp dẫn đến sự hình thành nhà nước
đặc điểm quy phạm pháp luật
Amanda and Kelly used to be friends after an argument with Amanda Kelly tell everyone at the galley middle school to me at the nearby park after schoo…
Explain, In your own words, why the therapeutic alliance is so important in confronting offenders.
LOAD MORE
Previous
Next
Ask your question
WE'RE IN THE KNOW
This site is using cookies under cookie policy. You can specify conditions of storing and accessing cookies in your browser
Company
About us
Careers
Advertise with us
Terms o
Get the Brainly App
Download Android App
Explanation:
Answer:
estabillodustineBeginner
Explanation:
except for in areas in which elections tend be uncontested for one party or the other, the role of precinct chair now involves being a(n) .
The role of precinct chair now involves being in the precinct planning. assisting in the planning of party activities. coordinating and serving as the precinct convention's leader.
In politics, the party chair serves as the party's chief executive. Political parties as much as countries vary in the type and significance of the position.
A party leader's responsibilities are frequently very different from those of a party chairman. The chairman's responsibilities usually center on the party's membership as a whole and its organizational activities. Chairmen frequently play significant roles in member recruitment and retention efforts, fundraising for political campaigns, and internal party governance, where they may sit on or even chair governing boards or councils. They frequently also have a say in choosing candidates, and occasionally even in creating and implementing party policy.
To learn more about precinct chair please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/29545296
#SPJ4
Question 6 of 10
What is one major problem created by globalization?
Answer:
Since developing countries like China and India can offer same products at cheaper rates, developed countries like the US are also bound to reduce their prices to stay in the competition.
Explanation:
hope this helped lol
Philip offers to sell his Car to Anna for K10,000.00. He says she can have a week to think about it and let him know her decision when they have lunch together. The day before their lunch date, Philip rings Anna to say that, he has changed his mind and decided to keep the car. Anna had been planning to accept the offer over lunch as it was agreed. Advise Anna on what she should do now.
My advise to Anna on what she should do now is: Anna should forget about buying the car as she does not have a valid contract to buy the car from Philip.
What is a contract?Contract is an agreement enter between two people or two or more people in which the parties involve in the agreement agreed to the terms and condition of the contract.
Based on the given scenario Anna does not have a valid contract with Philip based on the fact that has changed his mind and decided to keep the car.
Therefore my advise to Anna on what she should do now is that Anna should forget about buying the car as she does not have a valid contract to buy the car from Philip.
Learn more about contract here:https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
what are the two methods for a defendant to respond when a prima-facie case of disparate treatment has been established?
There are two methods for a defendant to respond when a prima-facie case of disparate treatment has been established: they can either provide a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the allegedly discriminatory action, or they can provide evidence of a legitimate, non-discriminatory policy or practice that justifies the discriminatory action.
The first method involves the defendant admitting that they took the allegedly discriminatory action, but claiming that there was a legitimate reason for doing so.
For example, an employer might argue that they fired an employee because they were consistently late for work, not because of their race or gender.
The burden of proof then shifts back to the plaintiff to prove that the defendant's reason was a pretext for discrimination.
The second method involves the defendant arguing that the allegedly discriminatory action was actually the result of a legitimate policy or practice that applies to all employees, regardless of their race, gender, or other protected characteristic.
For example, an employer might argue that they only hire candidates who have a certain level of education or experience and that this requirement is necessary for the job.
The burden of proof then shifts back to the plaintiff to prove that the policy or practice is not legitimate or that it has a discriminatory impact on a particular group.
Both of these methods require the defendant to provide evidence to support their argument, and both can be challenged by the plaintiff.
Ultimately, the court will consider all the evidence presented and make a determination as to whether the defendant's actions were discriminatory or not.
Know more about discriminatory action here:
https://brainly.com/question/1176355
#SPJ11
Which of the following is a true statement about time limits?
A. They aren't a part of the court's rules of procedure
B. They aren't imposed by state law and court rules,
C. They involve civil cases, but not criminal cases,
D. They can be found in state statutes.
Answer:
b.
Explanation:
Which of the following is not true.
The study of crime, or criminology, is rich with different theories as to why people commit crimes.
0 None of the above
O A criminologist is a specialist in the field of crime and the causes of criminal behavior
Criminology is the scientific study of crime and the causes of criminal behavior
Explanation:
none of the above is the answer
There are all the statement are related to the crime are not true, it's the none of above. Thus, option (b) is correct.
What is the crime?
The term crime refers to the illegal activity. The crime is not allowed to the country, if any person are committed the crime are gone the jail. The legal punishable by the state in case of crime. The punishment is set according to the different crime. For example, a person is harm another person property.
According to the given, the statement are related to the study of the crime or criminology are not the significance to the properly. It was not the scientific study of the crime and not the specialist in the field. It was also not the study of why the people are the committing the crime.
As a result, the statement are related to the crime are not true, it's the none of above. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on crime, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9997722
#SPJ5
Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.
Answer:
Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.
A court does not have the power to invalidate a federal statute even though it conflicts with the US Constitution because it was passed by Congress. a. True b. False
False. Courts do have the power to invalidate a federal statute if it conflicts with the US Constitution. The principle of judicial review allows courts to declare laws unconstitutional and nullify them, ensuring the supremacy of the Constitution over legislative acts passed by Congress. Therefore, option b is correct.
Courts are institutions within the judicial system that have the authority to adjudicate legal disputes and administer justice. They are responsible for interpreting and applying the law to resolve conflicts between individuals, organizations, or the government.
Courts provide a forum for parties to present their cases, and judges or justices make decisions based on the facts, evidence, and applicable laws. Courts ensure due process, protect individual rights, and uphold the rule of law. They play a vital role in maintaining order, resolving disputes, and safeguarding justice in a fair and impartial manner.
Learn more about judicial system here:
https://brainly.com/question/1145536
#SPJ4
under the equal pay act of 1963 an employee may not be paid at a lesser rate than employees of the opposite sex for tasks requiring equal skill, effort, and responsibility.T/F
True. The Equal Pay Act of 1963 prohibits employers from paying employees of one sex less than employees of the opposite sex for performing work that requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility.
The act was passed to address gender-based pay discrimination and promote equality in the workplace. It is important to note that the act applies not only to employees in the same job title or position, but also to those who perform comparable work. Employers who violate the act may be subject to legal action and required to pay damages and back pay to the affected employees.
To know more about Equal Pay Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31762810
#SPJ11
the model penal code "choice of evils" provision contains five elements.a. trueb. false
The statement is false. The Model Penal Code's "choice of evils" provision does not contain five elements.
The "choice of evils" defense, also known as the "necessity defense," allows a defendant to argue that their actions were justified because they were necessary to prevent a greater harm or evil. While the Model Penal Code recognizes the "choice of evils" defense, it does not specify a specific number of elements for its application.
The Model Penal Code provides general principles and guidelines for criminal law, but the specific elements and requirements of the "choice of evils" defense may vary among jurisdictions. The defense typically requires the defendant to demonstrate that they faced an imminent threat or danger, that there were no reasonable alternatives available, that the harm caused by their actions was less than the harm they sought to prevent, and that their conduct was proportional and reasonable under the circumstances.
Learn more about Model Penal Code's
https://brainly.com/question/31667549
#SPJ4
Please choose all that describe a series circuit .A series circuit has no resistors.
b If there are many bulbs in a circuit with a battery (cell), it is very likely that the light will be brighter with each additional bulb.
c All of the parts of a series circuit—power source, wires, and devices—are connected along the same pathway
d If one device in a series circuit burns out or is disconnected, the entire circuit is broken
e The electrons have multiple pathways to travel.
f Each time there is damage (break) in any one of the resistors the entire circuit will not function.
g The amount of current is the same at every point in a series circuit.
Answer:
E i hope i used my brain (:
The judge ruled in favor of Sam. The statements made to the jury by Linda and Sam immediately after the jury was chosen were _____.
rue or False: If you are under the age of 18, your license can be suspended for six months to one year for the first offense.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
as you go on 1st offence 2nd offence 3rd offence and so forth it gets worse depending on how bad your first offence will be 6 months to a year
Please post detailed answers to the following questions. Please use complete sentences.
Why do you think individuals commit crimes?
The relative proportion of speeding-related crashes to all crashes decreases with increasing driver age. A. TRUE B. FALSE
Answer:
A. TRUE
Explanation:
In 2004, 38 percent of the male drivers
age 15 to 20 who were involved in fatal crashes were speeding at the time of
the crash.
The relative proportion of speeding-related crashes to all crashes decreases with increasing driver age. The statement is true. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is driver?
Driver is the name for the person who operates the car. A good driver is aware of all traffic rules and is mindful of their obligation to maintain public property while avoiding endangering other road users. The legislation and regulations governing traffic must be followed by the motorist. Horn use by drivers damages the environment by generating noise pollution.
As a driver's age increases, the proportion of accidents involving speeding to all accidents decreases. Male drivers aged 15 to 20 who were involved in fatal collisions in 2003 made up 39% of the population. It is obvious that driving while intoxicated is harmful.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct.
Learn more about on driver, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10854026
#SPJ2
Derick has been working as a first responder since many years. His primary responsibility at a crime scene is to question witnesses and gather useful information from the scene. Which of these first responder career roles does Derick fit into?
The first responder career roles which Derick fit into is a: B. police officer.
What is a career field?A career field can be defined as a series of sequential and related occupations (jobs) that make use of similar skills, and they typically lead to the short and long-term career goals of an individual such as a police officer.
Who is a police officer?A police officer can be defined as an expert or professional who has been trained and licensed as a first responder to any issue that arises within the public space, especially by gathering intelligence, useful information, and question witnesses of an event.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that Derick fit into a police officer because he his primarily saddled with the responsibility of questioning witnesses and gather useful information from a crime scene.
Read more on police officer here: https://brainly.com/question/25781646
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Derick has been working as a first responder since many years. His primary responsibility at a crime scene is to question witnesses and gather
useful information from the scene. Which of these first responder career roles does Derick fit into?
OA paramedic
OB. police officer
Oc. fire truck driver
OD. firefighter
The defendant wanted to borrow his neighbor's car to go shopping for lawnmowers. Knowing that the neighbor was out of town for the weekend, the defendant opened the neighbor's garage door and took a car key that the neighbor hid in an old coffee can for emergencies. Once inside, the defendant, mistakenly believing that larceny applied only to the taking of items valued at over $100, decided to take the neighbor's lawnmower (worth $75) in order to trade it in on a new mower. However, on the way to the store with the mower, he was involved in an automobile accident, totaling the car. In a common law jurisdiction, of what property is the defendant guilty of larceny
Answer:
In a common law jurisdiction, the property that the defendant is guilty of larceny is the lawnmower.
Explanation:
Larceny or theft is the intentional possession of someone's property for the purpose of permanently depriving the owner of its use. The property may be the person's identity, intellectual property, services, and personal property. Though the automobile was totally ruined, the neighbor did not initially intend to dispossess the owner of the car. But he intended to dispossess the owner of the lawnmower since he was about to trade it in for a new one, which will belong to him and not the former owner.
Time limit for full time pharmacist to review drug withdrawal in Class-CASC?
The time limit for a full-time pharmacist to review drug withdrawal in Class-CASC (Class C Ambulatory Surgery Center) typically depends on the specific policies and regulations in place at the facility or within the jurisdiction. Class C Ambulatory Surgery Centers provide surgical services that require anesthesia, and a pharmacist's review of drug withdrawals is crucial for ensuring patient safety and compliance with standards.
In general, a full-time pharmacist should review drug withdrawals in a timely manner, ideally within 24 hours or less, to ensure the proper management and documentation of medications used within the facility. This timeframe may vary depending on factors such as the pharmacist's workload, the complexity of the withdrawal process, and any relevant regulations or policies in place.
It is essential for pharmacists to maintain up-to-date knowledge on drug withdrawals, interactions, and contraindications to ensure patient safety. This includes staying informed about drug recalls, FDA alerts, and changes in drug classifications. Regularly reviewing drug withdrawals within the Class-CASC helps to prevent medication errors, improve patient outcomes, and maintain compliance with relevant regulations and accreditation standards.
In summary, while the specific time limit for a full-time pharmacist to review drug withdrawals in a Class-CASC may vary, it is generally recommended that this process be completed within 24 hours or less to ensure patient safety and compliance with established policies and regulations.
Learn more about jurisdiction here :-
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
Legal insanity is a state of contractual _____, as determined by law.
A.incapacity
B.mistake
C.nullification
D.confusion
E.misunderstanding
Legal insanity is a state of contractual incapacity, as determined by law. This means that individuals who are legally insane are unable to enter into a valid bdue to their mental condition.
The law recognizes that such individuals lack the ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions, and therefore, any contracts entered into by them are considered null and void.
Contractual incapacity due to legal insanity is an important concept in contract law, as it ensures that individuals who are not capable of making rational decisions are not bound by agreements that they may not have understood or intended to enter into. The determination of legal insanity is typically made by a court of law, and may involve an assessment of the individual's mental health and ability to understand the nature of the contract.
It is important to note that legal insanity is not the same as a mistake, nullification, confusion, or misunderstanding. While these concepts may also render a contract invalid, they are not necessarily tied to an individual's mental health or capacity. Legal insanity is a specific legal concept that recognizes the limitations of individuals who are unable to make rational decisions due to their mental state, and seeks to protect them from entering into contracts that may be detrimental to their well-being.
To know more about legal insanity
https://brainly.com/question/31445937
#SPJ11
49. China has indicated that it may invade and forcefully unify Taiwan, who is a strong U.S. business partner. U.S. ________ ________over that last several decades has over that last several decades has.
A. Foreign policy
B. Military policy
C. Asia policy
D. Pacific policy
The United States, option (A): foreign policy over the last several decades relations between Taiwan and the United States became unofficial and informal during the Communist Party of China's leadership as "China" in 1979.
What is the relationship between the United States and Taiwan?Despite the fact that the US does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan, we have a strong unofficial relationship and a long-term interest in sustaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
A policy of deliberate ambiguity in the United States (US) foreign policy toward Taiwan is necessary to maintain cross-strait relations and, if possible, to protect Taiwan from the People's Republic of China invasion, whereas a policy of comprehensive clarity on Taiwan would likely provoke the People's Republic of China challenges and opposition to the United States (US) legitimacy in East Asia and beyond.
Check out the link below to learn more about US foreign policy;
https://brainly.com/question/19393069
#SPJ1
Which law states that the volume of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas when the temperature and pressure are held constant?
The Ideal Gas Law states that the volume of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas when the temperature and pressure are held constant.
The Ideal Gas Law states that the pressure multiplied by the volume of a given mass of an ideal gas is equal to the product of the gas' absolute temperature and its molar mass.
Mathematically, this can be expressed as P*V = n*R*T, where P is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature.
To learn more about Ideal Gas Law link is here
brainly.com/question/28257995
#SPJ4
Read the section on “litigation in a court of law” (Study Unit 4 of your Study Guide) and then
differentiate between (i) examination-in-chief and (ii) cross-examination”. Give practical
examples.
When a dispute is resolved through the public court system, litigation refers to the process of submitting or responding to a complaint.
What exactly does "litigate your lawsuit" mean?Defending or enforcing a legal claim through a court-supervised process is what is referred to as litigating in legal proceedings that take place between two parties after the filing of a lawsuit.
What does the phrase subject to litigation mean?Subject Litigation includes all actions brought, or threats of actions made, by stockholders of the Company with respect to or resulting from the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including any and all actions brought on or after the date of this Agreement;.
To know more about litigation visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/14678868
#SPJ1
Which military arm began as the emerging nation's volunteer militia?
The
began as the emerging nation's volunteer militia.
Money, services, property, and promises to act or not act are examples of
types of
A. consideration
B. acceptance
O O O
C. mutual assent
D. form
SUBMIT
Answer: Consideration
Explanation:
THE MONKEY'S PAW
ESCAPE ROOM code
Answer:
The the hek does that mean?
Helen, a regular customer, needs to send money to her grandsons best friend after receiving an emergency call.
their car broke down while traveling across country. what could you say/ask to determine if helen is a victim of fraud.
In order to determine if Helen is a victim of fraud, you would have to ask her where the call was coming from.
How to determine fraud victims?Fraud is the deliberate misrepresentation of facts in order to get your money, credit, or private data.
Con artists make unrealistic promises about nonexistent items, nonexistent services, or nonexistent financial benefits. Frauds are constantly evolving and adjusting to new technologies and con games. Anyone can become a victim of fraud or identity theft since they fall under such a broad area of crimes.
Read more on fraud here:https://brainly.com/question/1063454
#SPJ1
A person is prosecuted for assaulting a neighbor.
Would this case be tried in a federal or state court
When a person is prosecuted for assaulting a neighbor, then this case would be tried in a state court.
What is a state court?A court in the US that decides issues based on state law rather than federal law stockholder class actions settled by state courts must be recognised by federal courts. State legislation protecting the rights of people with disabilities allows them to file a claim for damages in state court.
The final decision-makers for state laws and constitutions are state courts. They may appeal to the US Supreme Court over how they interpret federal law or the US Constitution. Such cases may or may not be heard by the Supreme Court.
Therefore, when any of the cases or incidents like assaulting a neighbor is filed, this case will be tried in the state court.
Learn more about state court from here:
https://brainly.com/question/23041991
#SPJ2