Happy Veterans Day! Remember to honor the people that honored us years ago and today. ~ In Loving Memory Of My Grandfather Who Served In The War~

Hii :))

A technique used to separate the components of a chemical mixture by moving the mixture along a stationary material, such as gelatin is known as chromotography.

DRAIOCHT ♡◇♡◇

Answer:

➢ the separation of a liquid mixture by passing it through a material through which some parts of the mixture travel further than others.

Explanation:

hope it will help you have a great day bye and Mark brainlist if the answer is correct

\(kai6417\)

#carry on learning

The strict penalty was contained in the 14th Amendment is States denying any male over the age of twenty-one the right to vote would have their representation in the House of Representatives reduced. Option B

The penalty described in option B is a provision found in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

According to this provision, if a state denies the right to vote to any of its male citizens over the age of twenty-one, the state would have its representation in the House of Representatives reduced proportionally. This penalty was intended to encourage states to grant voting rights to all eligible male citizens.

Learn more about 14th Amendment at https://brainly.com/question/18054173

#SPJ1

Answer:

The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:

They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.

It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.

A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.

The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.

The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.

A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

https://brainly.com/question/32247683

#SPJ12

Answer:

It is in the south I think so

Answer:  The factors that can cause two similar Supreme Court cases to have different outcomes are:  different attorneys, different Supreme Court Justices, when/date/era, cases of precedent, other pending court cases, and even though the cases are similar there would be differences and those differences that appear to be small, may actually be significant.

Explanation:  Different attorneys present cases and specific points of the case differently.  How cases are presented, what evidence is presented, and what elements of the case they are requested the decision be based on can all determine the outcome.  Different Supreme Court Justices have different views, experiences, and interpretations of the law.  Some are liberal and some are conservative, so based on that they will lean one way or the other.  When the case has come before the Supreme Court is extremely important.  What is happening in the country at the time, the view of the American people, what the individual states are doing, and what kind of movements or pushes that are going on in society all play in to how cases will be viewed.  For example, if gender or race discrimination are getting a lot of focus in society and other related court cases are going on, the Supreme Court will likely take that into consideration in their interpretation of the law and react more liberally if the law is conservative in nature but society as a majority is pushing the issue to the liberal side.  In looking at similar cases, there are always differences, and those differences may be the deciding factor in the outcome of a case.  For example,  you may have a case of a 17 year old involved in one court case and an 18 year old involved in another, so even though they are only one year apart in age, in the eyes of the law, one is a minor and one is an adult.  

Different lawyers, different Supreme Court justices, when/date/era, precedent cases, and other pending court cases, and even though the cases are similar, there may be differences that, despite their apparent smallness, may be very important. These factors can result in two similar Supreme Court cases having different outcomes.

Cases and certain parts of the case are presented differently by various attorneys. The manner in which cases are presented, the evidence that is offered, and the aspects of the case that are sought to form the basis for the judgment are all factors that might affect the result.

Justices of the Supreme Court differ in their perspectives, backgrounds, and legal interpretations. They will lean one way or the other depending on whether they are liberal or conservative. It is crucial to know when the Supreme Court heard the case.

Learn more about the Supreme court, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ2

Answer:

Because the House dissolves at the end of a Congress and must start anew at the beginning of each new Congress

Explanation:

Answer:

As a college student at The University of Pennsylvania she saw and met kids who didn’t grow up in the best families and didn’t get the opportunities like other kids did. These kids were practically shipped off to prison and the ones who had good opportunities in life didn’t.

Other questions and answers:

4.What kind of games did Goffman see children in the neighborhood playing? What does this tell you about what these kids are seeing in their community? Explain.

She had seen kids playing a game of chase. Kids would split up into two groups, those being chased and those doing the catching. If they were caught, they would get handcuffed. This tells me that kids are seeing things they shouldn’t be seeing in their communities.

5.What did Goffman do and what did she witness in the first 18 months that she lived in the neighborhood?  Discuss your reaction to this and how this compares to where you live?

She says that she wrote down every time she witnesses her neighbors had an interaction with thepolice, In the first 18 months she witnesses police stop people in cars, they would search them,

Please give me a 5 star rating!

Answer:

As a college student at The University of Pennsylvania she saw and met kids who didn’t grow up in the best families and didn’t get the opportunities like other kids did. These kids were practically shipped off to prison and the ones who had good opportunities in life didn’t.

Explanation:

E2020

Answer:

Ummm why is this even here

Explanation:

Answer: I think its D

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

It has to be A because it's about preventing the crashes from happening in the first place

Answer:

the legislative branch

Answer:  Either B or D

Explanation:

B would be the answer though because the quote is talking about the responsibility  we have Towards the constitution and option B talks about the duty which is also known as the responsibility we have.

Not sure but I go with B as the answer.

B.. murder...

family want answers, why, how...

motive...

xbfrnd, spouse, b...

consider defense........

Answer:

D. It is the selling or pawning of Another's property without his or her approval that constitutes robbery.

Explanation:

Their are several charges that can on a person or a property, on a person, is like Assault and Murder, while Selling or pawning items is considered a crime on property. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) states: "The object of Crimes Against Property, e.g., robbery, bribery, and burglary, is to obtain money, property, or some other benefits"

Robbery is considered a crime against persons rather than a property crime because It is the selling or pawning of another’s property without his or her approval that constitutes robbery.

Crime is the deliberate performance of an act that is generally regarded as socially destructive or dangerous and is expressly banned by, and subject to, criminal sanctions.

There are many accusations that can be brought against either a person or a piece of property. For example, assault and murder are crimes against people, whereas selling or pawning objects is a criminal against property. The goal of crimes against property, such as robbery, bribery, and burglary, is to obtain money, property, or other benefits, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI).

Therefore, Robbery is considered a crime against persons rather than a property crime because It is the selling or pawning of another’s property without his or her approval that constitutes robbery.

Learn more about Crime, here;

https://brainly.com/question/9997722

#SPJ2

Hello! The answer would be C: an employer refuses to consider senior citizens for jobs.

This is because one' is discriminating towards a specific group of people which happens to be senior citizens. This does not allow equal opportunity for them so there it is violating their civil rights.

Citizens of the United States are obligated to pay taxes on money they earn and purchases they make. Also, young men must register their names with the Selective Service System once they turn 18.

The selective service system is a method of conscription that is used by the United States government to draft citizens into the military. The system is also used to provide a pool of potential candidates for other government agencies and programs. The selective service system is fair, efficient, and necessary for the defense of our country.

The system is also an important part of our country's history, dating back to the Civil War. In United States Selective Service System continues to play a vital role in our nation's defense, and I am proud to be a part of it.

To know more about Selective service system, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/16744580

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation: passing standardized tests will help the teachers in gaining more confidence while teaching students and to interact with them in a different manner.

Answer:

B. 33%

Explanation:

It's estimated that 1/3 to 1/2 of the money in the America during the civil war was counterfeit

To answer the cross-examination questions, you can begin thus:

No, it is not true that I was riding my bike on the sidewalk at 7pm on April 23rd.

No, my bike is not my only mode of transportation.

Yes, I was heading home.

On April 23rd it is not a fact that I was crossing the intersection of Elm Street & 3rd.

A cross-examination is a series of questions that are meant to verify the truthfulness of answers previously given. A cross-examination can help a person uncover the truth of a situation or a lie that they have been previously told.

In the above cross-examination, the respondent's answers to the questions will help to understand the truth.

Learn more about cross-examination here:

https://brainly.com/question/9010663

#SPJ1

Cross-examination of Sam Smith

Isn’t it true that you were riding your bike on the sidewalk at 7pm on April 23rd?

Your bike is your only mode of transportation. Correct?

You were heading home. correct?

On April 23rd isn’t it a fact that you were crossing the intersection of Elm Street & 3rd

When comparing the Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, with International Human Rights Law, represented primarily by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), there are indeed rights that are present in one but not the other. Two such examples are:

For more such questions on Amendments

https://brainly.com/question/458137

#SPJ8

Answer: Many believe god created this world

Explanation: Earth was created when material that orbited the early Sun began to accumulate into a spherical body. It's believed that the water in the Earth's oceans was deposited by comets.

(Credit Wisegeek.com)

Hey There!!~

That answer will be is Jesus. I mean he's the maid one who created the universe. Because, If we didn't have him we wouldn't be alive right now.

Hope This Helps!!~

By ☆~Itsbrazts☆~

Poisonings go undetected in our modern day because poison testing can only be carried out by forensic toxicologists with at least 15 years of experience.

Injury or death brought on by ingesting, breathing, touching, or injecting various medications, chemicals, venoms, or gases is referred to as poisoning. Many chemicals, including medicines and carbon monoxide, become hazardous at larger dosages or concentrations. Pesticides, personal care and topical goods, and cleaning chemicals are some of the top 10 household products that cause poisoning exposures experience each year. Poisonings at work result from exposure to a range of chemicals. Over 90% of toxic exposures take place at home.

To learn more about Poisonings, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/8439604

#SPJ1

The Shout and Rattle watch was so called because the watch would use shouts and rattles to draw attention to unlawful activity. Therefore, the option A holds true.

An unlawful activity can be referred to or considered as an activity which has been identified as illegal or unregulated under the court of law, and doing so may lead to appropriate actions as awarded under the legislations related to such act.

In order to identify and unlawful activities, a special kind of watch named Shout and Rattle watch was used. It was helpful in drawing the attention towards the occurrence of any unlawful activity in the surroundings of the watch.

Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of an unlawful activity.

Learn more about unlawful activity here:

https://brainly.com/question/14520311

#SPJ2

Clive's Marine unit of 2,200 Marines with helicopter support lands at a beachhead with enough supplies to last for a couple weeks. They begin setting up a basic logistics operation with the expectation of a larger force to arrive later. Clive's unit is Marine Expeditionary Unit. So, option A is the right  choice.

Clive's Marine unit of 2,200 Marines with helicopter support and a basic logistics operation is most likely Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU).

For more such question on Marine Expeditionary Unit

https://brainly.com/question/30378152

#SPJ8