Good night guys, im not going to sleep but maybe u are<33

Answer:B

Step-by-step explanation:

It seems that your daughter has repeatedly broken her phone within a short period of time. This raises concerns about her ability to take care of her belongings.

Additionally, the comparison made between being responsible for a phone and being responsible for a car suggests that if she cannot handle the responsibility of a phone, she may not be ready to drive a car.

1) The first instance mentioned is that your daughter broke the screen of her phone within two weeks of receiving it.

2) The second instance mentioned is that she broke the entire phone within a month.

3) The conclusion drawn is that your daughter is unable to take care of her phone.

4) The analogy is made that being responsible for a phone is similar to being responsible for a car.

5) Therefore, it is concluded that she would not be able to handle the responsibility of driving a car.

Based on her track record of breaking phones, it is understandable to be concerned about your daughter's ability to take care of a car.

It would be prudent to ensure she demonstrates responsibility and an ability to care for her belongings before considering allowing her to drive a car.

To know more about responsible responsible visit;

https://brainly.com/question/33299331

#SPJ11

To evaluate the hypothesis, the research team uses a test statistic to compare the sample mean from a sample to the mean of a national norm group.

Calculation of the Test Statistic: Test statistic formula is given as, The formula for a t-test is:  t = (M - μ) / (s / sqrt (n)),where M is sample mean, μ is the population mean, s is the standard deviation of the sample, and n is the number of individuals in the sample. Here, The assumed population mean = μ = 20
The mean from a sample of 25 students = M = 22
Standard error = s = 4
Sample size = n = 25
Plugging in the values in the t-formula: t = (M - μ) / (s / sqrt (n))t = (22 - 20) / (4 / sqrt (25))t = 2 / 0.8t = 2.5 (rounded to one decimal place)
The value of the test statistic from this analysis is t = 2.5.

To know more about hypothesis refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Answer:

b hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10^3 times

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide the area of A by the area of B

10^9 / 10^6 = 10^3

ANSWER

∡5

EXPLANATION

Corresponding angles are the ones that are on the same side of the transversal and on the same side of each of the parallels

The explicit formula is C = 3.14 × d.

What is the explicit formula?

The formal equations for L-functions in mathematics are Riemann's zeta function and links between sums over an L-function's complex number zeroes and sums over prime powers.

Here, we have

Given:

d    C

2    6.28

3    9.42

5    15.70

10   31.40

We have to find the explicit formula that describes the given pattern.

We concluded from the given table that

when d = 2

we get

c = 3.14 × 2 = 6.28

When d = 3

We get

c = 3.14 × 3 = 9.42

When d = 5

We get

c = 3.14 × 5 =  15.70

When d = 10

we get

c = 3.14 × 10 = 31.40

Hence, the explicit formula is C = 3.14 × d.

To learn more about the explicit formula from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/31127733

#SPJ1

Answer:

39 SIR

Step-by-step explanation:

Given function:y = √(1 – x³)We need to find dy/dx.As per the chain rule of differentiation, if y = f(u) and u = g(x), then the derivative of y with respect to x is given by dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx.

Now, let u = 1 – x³. Then, y = √u ⇒ y = u^(1/2).

dy/dx = dy/du * du/dxdy/du = 1/(2√u) = 1/(2√(1 – x³))du/dx = -3x²Therefore, dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx = 1/(2√(1 – x³)) * (-3x²) = (-3x²)/(2√(1 – x³)).

Therefore,  (A) 3(1 - x²)².Option (A) is the correct answer.

The given function is y = √(1 – x³) and we need to find dy/dx. As per the chain rule of differentiation, if y = f(u) and u = g(x), then the derivative of y with respect to x is given by dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx.

Let u = 1 – x³. Then, y = √u ⇒ y = u^(1/2).

We need to find dy/dx.dy/dx = dy/du * du/dxdy/du = 1/(2√u) = 1/(2√(1 – x³))du/dx = -3x².

Therefore, dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx = 1/(2√(1 – x³)) * (-3x²) = (-3x²)/(2√(1 – x³)).

Thus, dy/dx = (-3x²)/(2√(1 – x³)).Therefore, the correct option is (A) 3(1 - x²)².  

The derivative of the given function y = √(1 – x³) with respect to x is (-3x²)/(2√(1 – x³)) and the correct option is (A) 3(1 - x²)².

To know more about chain rule :

brainly.com/question/31585086

#SPJ11

The partial derivative diffusivity equation for spherical flow is ∂²p/∂r² + (1/r) ∂p/∂r = ϕμC/k ∂p/∂t, and for hemispherical flow, it is the same equation.

1. The partial derivative diffusivity equation for spherical flow is derived from the spherical coordinate system and applies to radial flow in a spherical geometry. It can be expressed as ∂²p/∂r² + (1/r) ∂p/∂r = ϕμC/k ∂p/∂t.

2. The partial derivative diffusivity equation for hemispherical flow is derived from the hemispherical coordinate system and applies to radial flow in a hemispherical geometry. It can be expressed as ∂²p/∂r² + (1/r) ∂p/∂r = ϕμC/k ∂p/∂t.

1. For the derivation of the partial derivative diffusivity equation for spherical flow, we consider a spherical coordinate system with the radial direction (r), the azimuthal angle (θ), and the polar angle (φ). By assuming steady-state flow and neglecting the other coordinate directions, we focus on radial flow. Applying the Laplace operator (∇²) in spherical coordinates, we obtain ∇²p = (1/r²) (∂/∂r) (r² ∂p/∂r). Simplifying this expression, we arrive at ∂²p/∂r² + (1/r) ∂p/∂r.

2. Similarly, for the derivation of the partial derivative diffusivity equation for hemispherical flow, we consider a hemispherical coordinate system with the radial direction (r), the azimuthal angle (θ), and the elevation angle (ε). Again, assuming steady-state flow and neglecting the other coordinate directions, we focus on radial flow. Applying the Laplace operator (∇²) in hemispherical coordinates, we obtain ∇²p = (1/r²) (∂/∂r) (r² ∂p/∂r). Simplifying this expression, we arrive at ∂²p/∂r² + (1/r) ∂p/∂r.

In both cases, the term ϕμC/k ∂p/∂t represents the source or sink term, where ϕ is the porosity, μ is the fluid viscosity, C is the compressibility, k is the permeability, and ∂p/∂t is the change in pressure over time.

These equations are commonly used in fluid mechanics and petroleum engineering to describe radial flow behavior in spherical and hemispherical geometries, respectively.

To learn more about partial derivative, click here: brainly.com/question/2293382

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

it is 2x

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5, 5, 5, 16, 16, 28, 29, 32, 35, 48

Mode: 5, 16

Median: 44/2 = 22

range: 48 - 5 = 43

mean: (5 + 5 + 5 + 16 + 16 + 28 + 29 +32 + 35 + 48)/10 = 219/10 = 21.9

Answer:

0.13

Step-by-step explanation:

because you have to round up when the fourth number is from 0-4 it stays the same but when its from 5- and up it goes up one

Answer: y=-2x-2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) The probability that the number of drivers will be at most 16 is approximately 0.644. (b) The probability that the number of drivers will exceed 27 is approximately 0.055. (c) The probability that the number of drivers will be between 16 and 27, inclusive, is approximately 0.829. The probability that the number of drivers will be strictly between 16 and 27 is approximately 0.185. (d) The probability that the number of drivers will be within 2 standard deviations of the mean value is approximately 0.954.

To solve the given problem regarding the Poisson distribution with parameter μ = 20, we can utilize the properties of the Poisson distribution and relevant calculations. Let's address each part of the question:

(a) To find the probability that the number of drivers will be at most 16, we can use the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the Poisson distribution. The formula for the Poisson CDF is:

P(X ≤ k) = e^(-μ) * (μ^0/0! + μ^1/1! + μ^2/2! + ... + μ^k/k!)

Plugging in the values, where k = 16 and μ = 20, we get:

P(X ≤ 16) = e^(-20) * (20^0/0! + 20^1/1! + 20^2/2! + ... + 20^16/16!)

Calculating this expression, we can find the probability. (Round the answer to three decimal places.)

(b) To determine the probability that the number of drivers will exceed 27, we can subtract the probability of the complement event from 1. In other words:

P(X > 27) = 1 - P(X ≤ 27)

Using the Poisson CDF, with k = 27 and μ = 20, we can calculate:

P(X ≤ 27) = e^(-20) * (20^0/0! + 20^1/1! + 20^2/2! + ... + 20^27/27!)

Subtracting this result from 1 will give us the desired probability. (Round the answer to three decimal places.)

(c) To find the probability that the number of drivers will be between 16 and 27, inclusive, we can subtract the cumulative probabilities of the complement events. Specifically:

P(16 ≤ X ≤ 27) = P(X ≤ 27) - P(X ≤ 15)

Using the Poisson CDF, with k = 15 and μ = 20, we can calculate:

P(X ≤ 15) = e^(-20) * (20^0/0! + 20^1/1! + 20^2/2! + ... + 20^15/15!)

By subtracting this probability from P(X ≤ 27), we will obtain the desired result. (Round the answer to three decimal places.)

To calculate the probability that the number of drivers will be strictly between 16 and 27, we can subtract the cumulative probabilities at the endpoints:

P(16 < X < 27) = P(X ≤ 27) - P(X ≤ 16)

By subtracting P(X ≤ 16) from P(X ≤ 27), we can determine the probability. (Round the answer to three decimal places.)

(d) To find the probability that the number of drivers will be within 2 standard deviations of the mean value, we can utilize the properties of the Poisson distribution. The mean value (μ) is given as 20. The standard deviation (σ) of a Poisson distribution is √(μ).

Within 2 standard deviations of the mean, we have a range of [μ - 2σ, μ + 2σ]. Plugging in the values, we get:

Range: [20 - 2√(20), 20 + 2√(20)]

Calculating the lower and upper bounds of this range, we can then use the Poisson CDF to find the probability of the number of drivers falling within this interval. (Round the answer to three decimal places.)

By following these steps, we can determine the probabilities associated with the number of drivers based on the Poisson distribution with a parameter μ = 20, as stated in the problem.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ11

The closest answer choice to this value is option 1, 33. Therefore, the best estimate for the unicity distance for an affine cipher is 33.

To find the best estimate for the unicity distance for an affine cipher, we can use the following formula:

Unicity Distance  (U) = (keyspace / entropy) × log2(1 / redundancy).

Given the answer choices:
1. 33
2. 35
3. 33
4. 26
5. 17.5

For an affine cipher, the keyspace is 26^2 (since there are 26 possibilities for both 'a' and 'b' in the equation

y = (ax + b) mod 26).

The entropy of English text is roughly 1.5 bits/character, and the redundancy is approximately 0.7.

Using the formula, we have:

U = (26^2 / 1.5) × log2(1 / 0.7)

U ≈ 33.49

Therefore, the best estimate for the unicity distance for an affine cipher is 33.

for such more question on unicity distance

https://brainly.com/question/31483371

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If you mean 3x^3 - 42x^2 - 4x + 5 = 0 you can graph it manually or with technology

The roots are 14.09, 0.30 and -0.39 to nearest hundredth.

Answer:

500(3)^x

Step-by-step explanation:

Got it right on edge

Answer:

50

Step-by-step explanation:

The angles must add up to 180 and 180-105=75-25=50

And yes you should

Answer:

x = 62.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Express the ratios as equivalent fractions, that is

\(\frac{5}{8}\) = \(\frac{x}{100}\) ( cross- multiply )

8x = 500 ( divide both sides by 8 )

x = 62.5

Step-by-step explanation:

of course the answer is linear

Answer:

3<2*x=5

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helped, Have a Wonderful Day/Night!!

( btw the astric means multiplication )

The unknown number will be equal to 4.

Expression in maths is defined as the collection of numbers variables and functions by using signs like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Numbers (constants), variables, operations, functions, brackets, punctuation, and grouping can all be represented by mathematical symbols, which can also be used to indicate the logical syntax's order of operations and other features.

Given that three is less than the product of 2 and a number is equal to 5. The unknown number will be calculated as:-

2x - 3 = 5

2x = 5 + 3

2x = 8

x = 8 / 2 = 4

Therefore, the unknown number will be equal to 4.

The complete question is given below:-

Three less than the product of 2 and a number is equal to 5. Calculate the unknown number.

To know more about an expression follow

https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ2

Answer:

6x+48

Step-by-step explanation:

6(x+8)

=(6)(x+8)

=(6)(x)+(6)(8)

=6x+48

Answer:

72

Step-by-step explanation:

6(4+8)

6(12)

the answer is 72

Answer:

0- -3 1/4+1 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

i belive this is the answer, but im not 100% sure sry if im wrong

Answer:

right side, bottom. curve

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the one that

goes /

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

59.50 liters (fraction from)

\(\dfrac{119}{2} \ in \ fraction \ form.\)

Step-by-step explanation:

30% of tank is filled. So, (100 - 30)% of tank is empty.

      70% of tank is empty.

  Capacity of the tank that is empty = 70% of 85 liters

In decimal form:

                                                           = 0.7 * 85

                                                          = 59.50 liters

In fraction form:

        70% of 85 = \(\dfrac{70}{100}*85\)

                          \(= \dfrac{7}{2}*17\\\\=\dfrac{119}{2}\)

Answer:

C. I got it right.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

c. RN=4.6 (100%).

Step-by-step explanation:

The blanks in each statement about the line segment should be completed as shown below.

Since we know U is the midpoint, we can say TU=8x + 11 substituting in our values for each we get:

8x + 11 = 12x - 1

Solve for x

We now want to solve for x.

−4x+11=−1

−4x = -12

x= 3

Solve for TU, UV, and TV

This is just the first part of our question. Now we need to find TU, UV, and TV. Lets start with TU and UV.

TU=8x+11 We know that x=3 so let’s substitute that in.

TU=8(3)+11

TU= 35

We will do the same for UV. From our knowledge of midpoint, we know that TU should equal UV, however let’s do the math just to confirm.

UV=12x−1 We know that x=3 so let’s substitute that in.

UV=12(3)−1

UV= 35

Based on the segment addition postulate, we have:

TU+UV=TV

35+35=TV

TV= 70

Find the detailed calculations below;

TU = UV

8x + 11 = 12x - 1

8x + 11 - 11 = 12x - 1 - 11

8x = 12x - 12

8x - 12x = 12x - 12 - 12x

-4x = -12

x = 3

By using the substitution method to substitute the value of x into the expression for TU, we have:

TU = 8x + 11

TU = 8(3) + 11

TU = 24 + 11

TU = 35

By applying the transitive property of equality, we have:

UV = TU and TU = 15, then UV = 35

By applying the segment addition postulate, we have:

TV = TU + UV

TV = 35 + 35

TV = 70

Read more on midpoint here: brainly.com/question/17918978

#SPJ1

Answer:   1/2 |x| = -3?

Step-by-step explanation: