The butterfly and caterpillar represent two stages of a complex and fascinating life cycle.
The butterfly and caterpillar represent two stages of a complex and fascinating life cycle. The butterfly's journey begins as an egg, which hatches into a tiny caterpillar. The caterpillar then spends most of its life eating and growing, shedding its skin several times as it becomes larger and more developed. Eventually, the caterpillar forms a chrysalis, where it undergoes a transformation into a butterfly. Inside the chrysalis, the caterpillar's body breaks down and reorganizes into a completely new form, complete with wings and a new set of sensory organs. The butterfly then emerges from the chrysalis and begins its new life as a beautiful, winged creature. This life cycle is a powerful symbol of growth, transformation, and renewal, and reminds us that change and growth are essential parts of life.
Learn more about caterpillar here https://brainly.com/question/11838798
#SPJ9
Correct question:
What are the stages of the butterfly's life cycle and how does the caterpillar transform into a butterfly?
Guys can you help me write a intro for y essay about Severe Weather
I will give brainlist
Answer:
Severe weather comes in different sizes and shapes such as Tornados, floods, lighting, hurricanes, and hail. They can cause damage to anything that gets in their path; sometimes depending on how big they are. For example, an F-0 tornado on a advanced Fujita scale for tornados can barely cause damage to houses and things around it with little wind. But a F-5 tornado can lift buildings and houses off the ground with ease and extremely high winds. Hope this helps. :)
Which question is an author most likely to ask when developing character motivation? How does my character talk? What does my character want? Whom is my character friends with? Where is my character from?
Answer:
What does my character want?
Explanation:
Answer:
What does my character want and describe it and add details
Explanation:
Pericles expresses doubts about the custom of making a speech to honor the dead. Do you think that Pericles honors the dead appropriately in this speech? Explain your thinking
Pericles honors the dead properly, though he focuses more on the living.
How does he do it?By highlighting the dedication that the dead had to Athena.By citing the life of efforts the dead have had.By making it clear that the dead did not die in vain.Pericles' speech is completely persuasive, as he wants to persuade the public to dedicate themselves to the success of the city of Athena. However, he does so by stressing the importance of the dead to the city and how their lives contributed to its triumphant growth.
In the speech, he highlights how much the dead sacrificed and used their strength, resilience, and skills to make the city strong and productive. According to the speech, they died keeping their obligations and the living must uphold the wishes and legacy of these people.
By acknowledging the effort and relevance of the dead, he promotes honor to the dead, manages to stimulate the public's sentimentality, and receives the public's attention.
Learn more about persuasive speeches at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14047451
#SPJ1
Next, I will write about smartphone games.
Strong: Claim
Weak: Not a Claim
Answer:
weak/ not a claim. the word WILL makes it weak, making it a statement
Answer:
Weak: Not a Claim
Explanation:
"Next" is the first sign that this is a weak claim. When you want to prove something don't use sequencing words to introduce that claim.
"I will write" Don't tell your reader what you are doing, they need to be able to figure it out by reading your paragraph. The objective shouldn't be written as simply.
"smartphone games..." what about smartphone games?
How a literature review will help you formulate your research question and hypothesis;
- How a literature review can assist you in defining the research methods you will use; and
- How a literature review can help you interpret your research results.
A literature review helps in formulating research questions and hypotheses by identifying gaps in existing knowledge and extending the current understanding of a subject.
It assists in defining research methods by examining previous studies' methodologies and selecting appropriate approaches. Additionally, a literature review aids in interpreting research results by comparing and validating findings with existing literature, identifying gaps, and suggesting future research directions.
A literature review serves as a foundation for research question formulation and hypothesis development by providing an overview of current knowledge and identifying areas that require further investigation. By examining existing literature, researchers can identify gaps in knowledge and formulate research questions that build upon and extend previous findings.
The literature review also plays a crucial role in defining research methods by offering insights into the methodologies employed in prior studies. Researchers can evaluate the suitability of those methods, identify successful research instruments and sampling techniques, and incorporate them into their own study design.
Furthermore, a literature review aids in the interpretation of research results by enabling comparisons with existing studies. Researchers can assess the consistency and validity of their findings, identify any gaps or limitations, and use the literature review to suggest areas for future research.
Overall, a comprehensive literature review is essential for guiding the research process, from question formulation and methodology selection to result interpretation.
To know more about literature refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/30339718#
#SPJ11
Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel, receiving the Nobel Peace Prize is an example of a/an ______ speech.
According to The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, what detail helped scholars determine that the second Egyptian inscription was a simpler form of Egyptian writing that had been created by “the people”?
The scholars had seen examples of it before written on rolls of papyrus, a writing material used by the Egyptians.
Since the scholars had already studied Egyptian languages, they recognized both the hieroglyphs and the demotic version.
The Greek inscription, which had already been deciphered, explained how to translate each of the Egyptian passages.
Since only ancient Egyptians understood hieroglyphs, the scholars knew the second inscription had to be a simpler version of the first.
HURRYY
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its c but I'm super sorry if its wrong!!
Answer:
The scholars had seen examples of it before written on rolls of papyrus, a writing material used by the Egyptians.
Explanation:
Because if you look into the text, (if you are given one) you will find that it states "They had seen examples of it before on rolls of papyrus, the writing material the Egyptians used instead of paper. Deciding that it was a simpler form of Egyptian writing, the scholars called it demotic, meaning “of the people." That means that they had seen it on a papyrus, and that it was the most simpler form of the Egyptian writings.
Hope this helps, and tell me if I am wrong or not.
a) My teacher wouldn't let me leave early.
My teacher refused...telet.me.eare.carly......
b) Jill sang without stopping for an hour.
Jill continued .......
c) Apparently you have passed the exam.
It seems ........
d) Richard thinks he is going to do well.
Richard expects ........*
e) What are your plans for the summer?
What do you intend ..............
f) Clearing up my room is something I dislike!
I hate ........
g) Helen said she'd go to the cinema with me.
Helen agreed ........
h) Tina and Brian are getting married.
Tina and Brian have decided
i) See you later, I hope.
I hope ............
j) What do you fancy doing this evening?
What do you want
Answer:
b. singing c.
Explanation:
• Underline text that is comic or ironic.
• Circle the extended metaphor in lines 14-17. • In the margin, explain her description of the Northerners in lines 4-13.
The text that contains the irony or comic is:
"I would say something like this: "Howdy-do-well-I-thank-you-where-you-going?
What is a Metaphor?A metaphor is simply a literary technique or a figure of speech that compares two objects or subjects that have nothing in common without using the words:
"like" or "as"
For example, Their skin was practically on fire." is a metaphor while "their skin was as fire itself" is a simile.
The extended metaphor is seen depicted as: a "Proscenium box for a born first-nighter."
Here he likens the top of the gate-post to a proscenium box.
Learn more about Metaphors at:
https://brainly.com/question/7954582
Prompt
Rubric Checklist
Award-winning author Sonia Nazario is
venr real and dangerous journey
best known for her Pulitzer Prize-winning biography Enrique's Journey. The book brings to life the
of a Honduran boy fleeing his home in hopes of finding his mother in America. In addition to the
biography, Nazario has written countless articles informing readers of the dangers children like
Enrique face. While the biography and the
articles serve the same purpose and present the same ideas, they do so in different ways. You will be comparing and contrasting how
Nazario informs her audience through a biography and an editorial. You may access the editorial here and the biography here.
Write a comparative essay in which you compare and contrast the way Sonia Nazario presents similar ideas in a an cite the evidence used in your essay. Be sure your essay uses formal and editorial. Support your comparison with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient evidence from both texts. Apply MLA guidelines to properly biography and
objective language.
Good evening,
1)Sonia Nazario is an award-winning journalist best known for Enrique's Journey, her story of a Honduran boy's struggle to find his mother in the U.S. Published as a series in the Los Angeles Times, Enrique's Journey won the Pulitzer Prize for feature writing in 2003 and is now available in an edition for young adults and in multiple languages.
When a national crisis erupted in 2014 over the detention of unaccompanied immigrant children at the border, Nazario returned to Honduras to report an article that was published in The New York Times in July. In her piece, she detailed the violence causing the exodus and argued that it is a refugee crisis, not an immigration crisis. After the article was published, she addressed the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and gave many interviews to national media, including The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, NBC's Meet the Press, Anderson Cooper 360, and Al Punto with Jorge Ramos (Spanish).
In this interview with Colorín Colorado, Sonia describes how she met Enrique and why she decided to retrace his journey despite dangerous and difficult conditions. She also offers tips for schools serving unaccompanied children and youth who have traveled north from Central America in recent years.
2) Concept:
<
In general linguistics, the comparative is a syntactic expression that communicates a quality or degree comparison between two things.two (or more) items or groups of entities (see also comparison (grammar) for an overview of comparison, as well as positive and superlative degrees of comparison).
Given:
Compare and contrast how Sonia Nazario conveys similar themes in a biography and an editorial in a comparative essay. Support your comparison with evidence from both texts that is well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient. To correctly reference the evidence utilised in your essay, follow MLA requirements. Make sure your essay has a professional and objective tone to it.
Find:
Compare and contrast how Sonia Nazario conveys similar themes in a biography and an editorial in a comparative essay. Support your comparison with evidence from both texts that is well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient. that is well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient. To correctly reference the evidence utilized in your essay, follow MLA requirements. Make sure your essay is written in a formal and objective tone.
Answer:
Sonia Nazario's Pulitzer Prize-winning biography Enrique's Journey is her most well-known work. The novel depicts the very real and perilous journey of a Honduran youngster escaping his home in search of his mother in the United States. Aside from the biography, Nazario has penned other pieces warning readers about the dangers that youngsters like Enrique face. The biography and the essays both have the same goal and offer the same ideas, but they do so in different ways. You'll compare and contrast how Nazario informs her audience via biography and editorial. The editorial can be seen here, and the biography can be found here. Write a comparative essay comparing and contrasting how Sonia Nazario expresses comparable topics in a different way. An editorial and a biography Support your comparison with evidence from both texts that is well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient. To correctly reference the evidence utilized in your essay, follow MLA requirements. Make sure your essay is written in a formal and objective
Instructions: Use the given interpretations to translate the
following arguments written in predicate logic into natural,
English sentences.
Ax: "x is an athlete"
Bx: "x is brawny"
Cx: "x is a champion"
m: "Mary"
g: "Gail"
n: "Ned"
Predicate logic, also known as first-order logic, is a formal system of symbolic logic that extends propositional logic by introducing variables, predicates, quantifiers, and functions.
Here is the translation of the following arguments:
1. ∃x(Ax ∧ Bx)
Translation: There exists an individual who is an athlete and is brawny.
English: There is someone who is both an athlete and brawny.
2. ∀x(Cx → (Ax ∧ Bx))
Translation: For all individuals, if they are a champion, then they are both an athlete and brawny.
English: Every champion is both an athlete and brawny.
3. (Ax ∧ Bx) → Cx
Translation: If an individual is both an athlete and brawny, then they are a champion.
English: If someone is both an athlete and brawny, then they are a champion.
4. ¬(Cx ∧ Bm)
Translation: It is not the case that Mary is both a champion and brawny.
English: Mary is neither champion nor brawny.
5. (Bn → Cn) ∧ (Am → ¬Bm)
Translation: If Ned is Brawny, then he is a champion, and if Mary is an athlete, then she is not Brawny.
English: If Ned is Brawny, he is a champion, and if Mary is an athlete, she is not Brawny.
Therefore, predicate logic provides a more expressive framework for reasoning about relationships between objects and making statements about individuals or groups of individuals within a domain.
For more details regarding predicate logic, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9515753
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Use the given interpretations to translate the
following arguments written in predicate logic into natural,
English sentences.
Ax: "x is an athlete"
Bx: "x is brawny"
Cx: "x is a champion"
m: "Mary"
g: "Gail"
n: "Ned"
1. ∃x(Ax ∧ Bx)
2. ∀x(Cx → (Ax ∧ Bx))
3. (Ax ∧ Bx) → Cx
4. ¬(Cx ∧ Bm)
5. (Bn → Cn) ∧ (Am → ¬Bm)
"Between the small print and the emojis, Dad is often confused by text messages, and once you start throwing in acms lke LOL, BRB, and TTYL, he is completely lost
What does "acronym" mean in this context? Use these dictionary entries to answer the question
acro- (prefix) end or sp
-onym (suff) name, word
O abbreviations made by putting together the first leters of words
O invented words used as a secret code
O words used to indicate the end of a sentence or thought
words that come from Latin or Greek
"acronym" mean in this context is about the abbreviations made by putting together the first letters of words. Thus, option A is correct.
What is an acronym?An acronym is indeed a word created by condensing consonants from a series of letters that are used as a single word.
An acronym, more particularly, is a particular kind of abbreviation made from the initial characters of such a cross term, surname, or expression that is spoken as a single term.
The acronym can is used as the first letter of the alphabet of the word. For example, brb will be right back but over here letter which is chosen only the first one is called an acronym.
Therefore, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about the acronym, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2696106
#SPJ1
after you open a can of worms, they always come home to roost. this is an example of
The idiom "open a can of worms" means to do something that will cause a lot of trouble or problems.
In this case, the phrase is saying that when you make a big change or reveal a hidden truth, you can't control how it will affect the situation or the people involved. The phrase "they always come home to roost" is a metaphor that means that the consequences of your actions will eventually catch up with you, just like a flock of birds returning to their roost at the end of the day.
So, to summarize, the idiom "open a can of worms" means to do something that will cause a lot of trouble or problems, and the phrase "they always come home to roost" is a metaphor that means the consequences of your actions will eventually catch up with you.
Learn more about worms visit: brainly.com/question/20490473
#SPJ4
What is an affix?
a word that sounds the same as another word
the beginning of a word
a word part added to the beginning or end of a word
the base part of a word
Answer:
Affix is a word part added to the beginning or end of a word
An affix is a word part that is added to the beginning or end of a word to create a new word or modify the meaning of an existing word. The correct option is C.
What are prefix roots and affixes?The location of an affix's attachment to a root determines its subclass. Infixes are inserted inside roots, suffixes are added after roots, and prefixes are added before roots. Circumfixes, which encircle a root, are even used in some languages. A different class of affix is referred to as a linker, linking morpheme, or filler.
Prefixes and suffixes are two types of affixes that can be added to the beginning or end of a word. Prefixes include "un-" in "undo" and "pre-" in "preview," whereas suffixes include "-able" in "comfortable" and "-less" in "hopeless." Affixes can be used to alter a word's meaning, such as adding "un-" to the word "happy" to produce "unhappy," or to alter its grammatical function, such as adding "-s" to the word "cat" to create "cats" (plural form).
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about affixes here:
https://brainly.com/question/10026519
#SPJ5
6. What point of view is used in "Was it a Dream? How does this point of view affect your experience as a reader? in one to two paragraphs, explain your answer
Answer:
Guy de Maupassant's short story “Was It a Dream?” uses the first-person point of view
Explanation: The unnamed main character acts as narrator, delivering the entire narrative in direct speech. The story begins with his declaration, “'I had loved her
you found this answer helpful make sure to ❣ and ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ :)
-Aaron
Which animal rights activist protested animal cruelty and research in ""a dog’s tale""?.
Mark Twain protested animal cruelty and research in ""a dog’s tale"".
"A Dog's Tale", is a short story by Mark Twain whose fascination and empathy for animals is evident in the countless depictions of animals in his books. Twain became increasingly aware of the use of animals in his experiments and opposed the practice.
The story of "A Dog's Tale" is told from the point of view of the beloved mother dog, Eileen Mavourneen. She earned her family a place of honor by rescuing her baby from her nursery school fire, but her needless experimentation forced her to be killed by her ruthless Bibisector owner. In the story, Twain denounces vivisection as an act of treason.
Know more about A Dog's Tale here
https://brainly.com/question/13735645
#SPJ4
Can someone rewrite this for me? The author Brittany Taylor uses metaphor in her "I, Too, Have A Dream." letter to illustrate an idea in the mind of the audience
Brittany Taylor, the author, employs metaphor in her "I, Too, Have A Dream" letter to explain a notion in the audience's mind. To rewrite the sentence.
What is rewrite?
The term rewrite sentence refers to the sentence was the written in the sentence but in the different style. It was to describe the sentence meaning was the similar, but the wittering style was the different. The rewrite the sentence was the but not the copy to the sentence.
According to the given, the sentence are the rewrite. There was the sentence is the different but, the meaning was the same. The sentence was the "Brittany Taylor, the author, employs metaphor in her "I, Too, Have A Dream" letter to explain a notion in the audience's mind."
As a result, the sentence was the Brittany Taylor, the author, employs metaphor in her "I, Too, Have A Dream" letter to explain a notion in the audience's mind. To rewrite the sentence.
Learn more about on rewrite, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14591508
#SPJ2
Explain the advantages and disadvantages when using solid
propellant rockets? Also include in your response how the
advantages will benefit the industry.
Solid rockets have pros and cons. Solid propellant rockets are simpler to build and more reliable. Rockets have lower particular impulses and fuel economy. Industry benefits from solid propellant rockets. They can make space launchers cheaper.
These rockets are suitable for commercial, military, and space exploration. Rockets that are easy to store, transport, and launch are more efficient. Solid propellant rockets have drawbacks. After ignition, the rocket cannot be stopped or controlled, making flight corrections impossible.
Rockets with a lower specific impulse may perform less well and use more fuel. Solid propellant rockets serve the industry in several ways. They can help create cheaper space launch vehicles. They can improve military missile reliability and cost.
Solid propellant rockets can launch small satellites to assist companies in creating new goods and services due to their simplicity. When creating novel applications, solid propellant rockets have several advantages and drawbacks.
To know more about rockets
https://brainly.com/question/21730284
#SPJ11
Image transcription textName:
Class Period:
Notice and Note Notes
Find as many examples of notice and note signposts in your book as you can. You
need to have at least 3 different signposts and at least 6 total signposts. Pick ONE
signpost and write a one chunk paragraph on the back, tying the signpost to the
author's purpose, theme, characterization, or conflict.
Type of Signpost
Quote & Page number
Answer to question
Again & Again
He keeps mentioning
how the houses are
tombs because people sit
in their dead-like... Show more
The "Notice and Note" signpost are a way for readers to pay attention to key moments in a text that can help them understand the author's purpose, theme, characterization, or conflict. In your book, you need to find at least 3 different signposts and a total of 6 signposts.
One example of a signpost in your book is the "Again and Again" signpost. This signpost refers to when an idea, image, or phrase is repeated throughout the text.
In your book, there is an example of the "Again and Again" signpost on page [insert page number]. The author keeps mentioning how the houses are like tombs because people sit in their dead-like...[continue the quote here].
By using the "Again and Again" signpost, the author is emphasizing the idea that the houses in the book have a negative and oppressive atmosphere. This repetition helps to establish the theme of confinement and the character's struggle within their environment.
Remember, this is just one example of a signpost in your book. Make sure to find at least 2 more signposts and write about them in one-chunk paragraphs, connecting them to the author's purpose, theme, characterization, or conflict.
To know more about signpost refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31016302#
#SPJ11
explain why the the apostrophe is incorrectly used in boss's
Answer:
You just follow the same rule as you would for any other noun. So, you would say, “my boss's name“. Just add apostrophe, “s” to “boss”. “My boss's name”
Explanation:
Which do you think is better?
Given a child allowance or giving money when they archive it?
Which one would you do?
Answer:
personally id give the money when the kid has earned it, but getting an allowance is good too but only if they have been good
Explanation:
Think about it, what would you do in that senaireo?
How does this support the idea that "the world on turtle's back" is a creation myth?
The idea that "the world on turtle's back" is a creation myth --- It explains the origin of people, animals, and plants.
What type of creation story is the world on the turtle's back?
“The World on the Turtle's Back” is an Iroquois creation story filled with conflict and compelling characters. The Iroquois passed down this story from one generation to the next by telling it in elaborate performances.
How was the world created in the world on the turtle's back?
In the creation stories of the Lenape and Iroquois people, the Earth is created as soil is piled on the back of a great sea turtle that continues to grow until it is carrying the entire world. Many indigenous tribes in North America refer to the continent as Turtle Island to this day
What is a creation myth?
A creation myth is a supernatural mytho-religious story or explanation that describes the beginnings of humanity, earth, life, and the universe (cosmogony), usually as a deliberate act of "creation" by one or more deities.
Learn more about the world on turtle back:
brainly.com/question/8562184
#SPJ4
after reading “for the birds” do you think putting out bird feeders is a good idea support your answer with evidence from the text
Answer:
After reading the article, I still believe that feeding the birds is a good idea.
Explanation:
The article shows that installing feeders that provide food to birds is a good action, but that it may not satisfy the real needs of birds, as each of them has a different nutritional need, and feeding them can expose them to dangers that they would not have in the urban environment.
However, even in the face of the negative points, I believe that installing bird feeders remains a good idea, since, with increasingly strong deforestation, birds have been experiencing difficult situations to find food, water and sometimes even shelter. Thus, being able to help them at least by feeding them is a noble and commendable step.
to advocate
According to your textbook the primary goal in a persuasive speech is:
The primary goal in a persuasive speech, according to the textbook, is to advocate. Advocacy is a method of influencing or changing public opinion and policy by persuading people and organisations to support your point of view, program, or issue.
Advocacy is essentially making a case for something and winning others over to your side. In a persuasive speech, the primary goal is to advocate or persuade the audience to accept your viewpoint on a specific issue or topic. The following are the steps involved in a persuasive speech:
Begin with a solid opening. A persuasive speech's opening must capture the audience's attention and motivate them to listen to the entire speech. Clarify your perspective: Explain your viewpoint on the issue and why you think it is right and necessary. Present your evidence: Present your arguments and examples to support your case.
Counterarguments should be considered and refuted. It's critical to anticipate your audience's objections and be prepared to refute them effectively. Conclusion: A persuasive speech's conclusion should summarize your key points and end with a powerful statement that persuades the audience to adopt your viewpoint.
More on Advocacy: https://brainly.com/question/31714262
#SPJ11
Which sentence is an example of an oxymoron?
ОА.
There was a swoosh then a plop when the pot of soup fell on the kitchen floor.
OB.
The cat purred and stretched its limbs as far as the four corners of the room.
OC. There was a roaring silence outside after the storm swept through the town.
O D.
The baby's cries pierced through the walls of the house and woke everyone up.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
An oxymoron is a figure of speech that uses contradiction. The only example of an oxymoron in these answers is C, where there is "a roaring silence". Since a silence means there is no sound, it is contradictory for it to be roaring.
There was a roaring silence outside after the storm swept through the town is the sentence is an example of an oxymoron. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is oxymoron?
Oxymorons are a category of illogically combined words. It's contradictory to use a figure of speech. Despite the absurdity and oxymoron of the sentences, they are appropriate for the context.
Although the two terms collectively have conflicting connotations, the way they are mixed emphasizes that. Some words include sweet agony, virtual reality, awfully good, and noticeably deficient.
An oxymoron is a figure of phrase that is frequently employed by poets and writers. Rhymes and poetry frequently use oxymorons. The third claim is an example of an oxymoron in which the words “roaring” and “quiet” both signify serenity without sound.
Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on oxymoron, here:
https://brainly.com/question/373505
#SPJ5
"Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string." What is being compared in this metaphor? self-trust to an iron string a heartbeat to an iron string a heartbeat to a vibration self-trust to a heartbeat
Answer:
Self-trust to a heartbeat.
Explanation:
The given quote "Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string" is from Ralph Waldo Emerson's essay "Self Reliance". This essay deals with the importance of believing in oneself and not just conforming to what the world wants us to be.
The given metaphor compares self-trust to that of a heartbeat. Emerson believes and emphasizes that everyone has their own 'tune' played according to how their lives are, just like the strings of a music instrument resonate different sounds. These strings produce their sounds depending on how tight or loose they are held, and each string also has a sound of its own. Just like that, a person's self-reliance and trust is different for every individual.
Thus, the correct answer is that self-trust is compared to a heartbeat.
Most skilled speakers are able to only briefly prepare for a speech and do not usually need to practice much or use note cards.
True
False
help me please!!!!!!!!
Activity A. Draw a map of your former of current school, and add labels of areas that you know of.
Activity B. Describe how your current or old classroom looked
Hopefully that was helpful
Which of the following is not true?A. Vitamin D interferes with Ca+ uptake in intestinesB. Elevated extracellular Ca levels prevent membrane depolarizationC. Decreased levels of extracellular Ca lead to spontaneous action potential generationD. Calcitonin decreases extracellular Ca+ levels
Answer:
A. Vitamin D interferes with Ca+ uptake in intestines
Vitamin D actually enhances the absorption of calcium in the intestines.
Vitamin D aids in the uptake of calcium rather than interfering with it. Hence, option A is not true.
Vitamin D actually enhances the absorption of calcium from the intestines. When activated in the kidneys, vitamin D promotes the synthesis of a calcium-binding protein called calbindin, which facilitates the transport of calcium across the intestinal lining into the bloodstream.
(B) Elevated extracellular Ca levels prevent membrane depolarization:
This statement is true as extracellular calcium is crucial for proper cell functioning. An increase in extracellular calcium levels makes it difficult for the membrane to depolarize, which leads to inhibition in the generation of an action potential.
(C) Decreased levels of extracellular Ca lead to spontaneous action potential generation:
This statement is also true, as a decrease in extracellular calcium concentration makes it easy for the membrane to depolarize, leading to the spontaneous generation of an action potential.
(D) Calcitonin decreases extracellular Ca+ levels:
This statement is true. Calcitonin is secreted by the thyroid gland, which decreases extracellular calcium levels by increasing calcium deposition in the bones and decreasing calcium absorption in the intestines.
Read more about Vitamin D here:
https://brainly.com/question/31226863
#SPJ11
'An old man turned ninety-eight', is that ironic?