Formal authority is
A. an established organization, especially one providing a public service.
B. the ability to cause others to behave as they might not otherwise choose
to do.
C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
the process and method of making decisions for groups.

Answer:

Explanation:

Crimes are basically acts that are defiant/transgression of laws that if violated the person or people who acted can be punished.

Some advantages of a lifetime appointment for the federal judges is that the purpose of giving the federal judges such extraordinary job security is in order to remove them from the political pressures.

There is the basic purpose of a lifetime appointment for the federal judges which is in order to assure that the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and to protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch.

However, among the 40 percent who tend to favor the lifetime appointments for some judges, there were several people who pointed that to how the setup protects judicial independence.

To learn more about the federal judges here:

https://brainly.com/question/2824627

#SPJ4

Answer:

The amount of the distributive share of partnership net income that is taxable by California is the share of the partnership's net income of $10,000 that can be attributed to Ewan.

Assuming he holds a 50% interest in the partnership, he is expected to pay tax on his share of the $10,000 (which is equal to $5,000) in California, where the income is earned and not where he resides.

Explanation:

A partnership as an entity does not pay taxes.  But individual partners must pay taxes on their shares of the partnership income, whether it is actually distributed or not.  The partnership usually lists the partners' income on Schedule K-1, while individual partners fill the normal individual tax returns.

As Richard bangs his head against the wall because doing so typically leads to his mother backing off on requests for him to do chores. The act of banging his head for past 2 weeks according to the Four-Factor Model of NSSI shows that the automatic-positive reinforcement function seems to be the MOST relevant to Richard’s NSSI.

The acronym "NSSI" means a nonsuici-dal self-injury, which refers to a repeated and intention damage to the surface of body with intent to cause bleeding, bruising or pain and no suidi-cal intent.

According to Nock & Prinstein, they demonstrated that both structural and construct validity of a four-factor model of NSSI functions includes a automatic-negative reinforcement, automatic-positive reinforcement, social-negative reinforcement and social-positive reinforcement.

Read more about nonsuic-idal self-injury

brainly.com/question/4036744

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Bangko Sentral has supervision over the operations of banks and exercises such regulatory powers as provided in the New Central Bank Act and other pertinent laws over the operations offinance companies and non-bank financial institutions performing quasi-banking functions.

Explanation:

Is this the answer you were looking for

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

Substituted judgment simply refers to a decision that is made by an individual on behalf of someone else who is considered to be incompetent and therefore unable to make a decision for himself or herself.

In such scenario, the decision-maker trhes as much as possible to be accurate and make a decision with facts on behalf of the incompetent person.

Answer:

The patients.

Explanation:

Answer:

b) Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

Explanation:

Utilitarians believe that the interest of government should be the same as that of the people, the reason is that, as a whole, the greatest liberty of people is a function of the welfare the people wish to enjoy, and this eads to the possibility and the desirability of progressive social change through peaceful political processes.

At the same time, Aristotle believe that government should govern for the general good or interest of the people, he concluded that, a kind of constitutional democracy, is the most ideal, as it sought for general interest of the people, in which rich and poor respect each other’s rights and the best-qualified citizens rule with the consent of all.

On the contrary, Rawls Liberalism believe that government should only uphold what is ideal, by balancing what is right with justice. According to him, government should protect the citizens, but not necessarily giving in to the aggregate pleasure of the people, that is, doing what is right, which will be supported by reasonable people as against what is considered good.

Hence, Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

Answer: C

Explanation:

Fire insurance marks are metal plaques with the insurance company's logo that were attached on the front of insured buildings to serve as a direction for the fire brigade of the insurance company.

Prior to the establishment of municipal fire departments, these identification markings were utilised throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The symbols in the UK are known as "Fire insurance plaques." The Sun Fire Office, founded in 1710, was the initial entity to utilise the mark. Historic structures in the older sections of British and American cities and larger towns still display some period artefacts. Iron, lead, and even brass were used to make cast metal plaques. Flat enamel signs, which were mostly produced in Continental Europe, were also produced, along with embossed sheet metal signs.

To know more about "fire insurance":

https://brainly.com/question/2657462

#SPJ1

The 12th congressional district of California is located in northern California. Since January 2013, Democrat Nancy Pelosi has represented the district. She has represented San Francisco's congressional districts since 1987.

I hope this helps you

:)

Mike files a suit against kay. before going to trial, the parties meet, with their attorneys present and representing them before a third party. They present their dispute to this third party (other than a court) who renders a legally binding decision. this is mediation. It is also called as arbitration

The mediator will typically meet with each party separately to understand each side's position and interests. The mediator will then try to facilitate a settlement agreement between the parties. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the mediator will issue a binding decision that the parties must follow.

Mediation is a process in which the parties to a dispute present their case to a neutral third party, who then renders a legally binding decision. This process can be used to resolve all types of disputes, including those involving contracts, property, personal injury, and family law.

Learn more about law at : https://brainly.com/question/13242861

#SPJ4

A search is unreasonable if a search warrant is not obtained from the court by the governmental official conducting the search.

Searching any residential, business place etc. without a warrant will be illegal, unreasonable and violation of the 4th amendment. Any evidence collected during this search will not be considered valid at trial.

It aims to deter the government officials from conducting unreasonable searches. To obtain the search warrant it is necessary to describe the details about the search such as the specific area of the search, what things can be seized, etc. This is also called the "Exclusionary rule."

To know more about search warrant, click here:  brainly.com/question/2863065

#SPJ4

Note that using the wage bracket method, Beckett Rice's federal income tax withholding for the semimonthly period is $0.

Using the information provided, we can calculate Beckett Rice's income tax withholding using both the percentage method and the wage bracket method:

Percentage Method:

Step 1: Determine the annual wages by multiplying the semimonthly wages by the number of pay periods in a year.

Annual wages = $3,000 x 24 = $72,000

Step 2: Subtract the annual withholding allowances from the annual wages to get the taxable income.

Taxable income = $72,000 - ($4,000 x 2) = $64,000

Step 3: Use the IRS tax tables to determine the annual federal income tax withholding. For a married filing jointly taxpayer with $64,000 in taxable income, the annual federal income tax withholding is $8,392.

Step 4: Divide the annual federal income tax withholding by the number of pay periods in a year to get the semimonthly federal income tax withholding.

Semimonthly federal income tax withholding = $8,392 / 24 = $349.67

Step 5: Subtract any additional amounts to be withheld for state and local taxes, if applicable.

Therefore, using the percentage method, Beckett Rice's federal income tax withholding for the semimonthly period is $349.67.

Wage Bracket Method:

Step 1: Determine the semimonthly wages after subtracting any additional deductions from gross wages.

Semimonthly wages = $3,000 - $3,000 = $0

Step 2: Use the IRS tax tables to determine the semimonthly federal income tax withholding for a married filing jointly taxpayer with no withholding allowances and $0 in semimonthly wages. According to the tax tables, the semimonthly federal income tax withholding is $0.

Step 3: Subtract any additional amounts to be withheld for state and local taxes, if applicable.

Therefore, using the wage bracket method, Beckett Rice's federal income tax withholding for the semimonthly period is $0.

Learn more about income tax withholding at:

https://brainly.com/question/11233097

#SPJ1

Explanation:

ROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

Sections

HomePolitics, Law & GovernmentPolitics & Political Systems

Proportional representation

politics

Cite Share More

WRITTEN BY

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....

See Article History

Proportional representation, electoral system that seeks to create a representative body that reflects the overall distribution of public support for each political party. Where majority or plurality systems effectively reward strong parties and penalize weak ones by providing the representation of a whole constituency to a single candidate who may have received fewer than half of the votes cast (as is the case, for example, in the United States), proportional representation ensures minority groups a measure of representation proportionate to their electoral support. Systems of proportional representation have been adopted in many countries, including Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.





Answer:

because of chlorophylls

Explanation:

chlorophyll absorbs light in the red and the blue regions of the visible light spectrum. Green light is not absorbed but reflected, making the plant appear green.

Answer:

chlorolphil makes the tree green

Explanation:

The burden of proof during pretrial evidence suppression hearings lies with the prosecution.

During pretrial evidence suppression hearings, it is the prosecution's responsibility to establish that the evidence in question should be admissible in court. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution to demonstrate that the evidence was obtained lawfully and in accordance with constitutional rights. The defense may argue for the exclusion of evidence by challenging its legality or arguing violations of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Ultimately, the court decides whether the evidence should be suppressed based on the arguments and evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense.

Learn more about suppression hearings

brainly.com/question/32331686

#SPJ11

Answer:

In my personal opinion, the wrongfully convicted should receive compensation after being released from jail or prison.

Explanation:

Being questioned while being innocent can very much damage someone's mental health due to the immense pressure, and being put in jail/prison for something you did not do is overall unjust. The least that someone could get for being wrongfully convicted is atleast getting paid.

Answer: The exclusionary rule

Explanation: The exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. The fact that evidence was illegally obtained does not mean that the charges are thrown out. It simply means that that evidence is inadmissible as evidence against the person whose rights were violated.

P.s hoped this helps!

Activities that are illegal regardless of their effect are known as per se violations.

Per se violations are prohibited by law without any consideration of their actual effect on competition. Some examples of per se violations include price fixing, bid rigging, and market allocation.

In contrast, rule of reason violations are prohibited only if they have an anticompetitive effect. The rule of reason approach is more flexible than the per se approach, and it allows courts to consider factors such as the purpose of the conduct, the effect on competition, and the availability of less restrictive alternatives.

Find out more on per se violations at https://brainly.com/question/30002463

#SPJ4

The Texas Constitution creates two top appellate courts: one for civil cases and one for criminal cases. This statement is True.

Learn more about Constitution here:

https://brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ4

The decision made by Habtamu to refuse medical and surgical treatment for his colon cancer, and instead seek alternative treatment, ultimately led to the deterioration of his condition and the belief that he only had a short time to live. The decision to seek alternative treatment may have been based on personal beliefs or mistrust of the medical system. However, this decision ultimately led to the progression of his cancer and the limited options for treatment at this stage.

The decision made by Habtamu to end his own life is a personal one and it is not for anyone to judge whether it is moral or immoral. However, as healthcare professionals, it is our duty to support and respect the patient's autonomy and their right to make decisions about their own health and well-being.

If I were in the place of the nurse, I would first try to understand the reasons behind Habtamu's decision to end his life and offer emotional support and resources for coping with his terminal illness. I would also inform the rest of the healthcare team about his decision and make sure that he receives appropriate palliative care, including pain management and emotional support. I would also consider connecting him with a counselor or a social worker to support him in his decision. Additionally, I would also make sure that the patient is aware of all the available options and the potential consequences of his decision, and provide him with the necessary information to make an informed decision.

Both the federal government and the several states have the authority to enact laws under the American federal system.

Local governments like counties and cities can as well, but their authority is typically viewed as coming from their state and is therefore more constrained.

Constitutional restrictions apply to both. Several subjects are the subject of both state and federal law, while some are substantially covered by federal law, others are dealt with nearly exclusively by the states.

In the United States, as interstate trade and personal travel have risen, so has the perceived need for more consistency in the law with regard to certain issues. In response to such a necessity, a federal statute on the matter was passed (e.g., the federal Securities Act of 1933).

Learn more about uniform law here

https://brainly.com/question/30646599

#SPJ1

Answer:

B

Explanation: Preamble Definition: the introductory part of a statute or deed, stating its purpose, aims, and justification.

Answer:

Bioplagical

Explanation:

Bioplagical creates negative effects