Find the missing side of the triangle SHOW YOUR WORK!!

Answer:

10.78 , 11 pallets

Step-by-step explanation:

24.5 x 22 divided by 50 + 10.78

Answer:

60°

Step-by-step explanation:

Because that is an equiangular triangle all the angles are the same. Which is 60°

Answer:

60 Degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Because it's an equilateral triangle and all the angles are all the same!

It adds up to 180 Degree

The tissues which are characterized by having few cells separated by a large amount of extracellular matrix are as follows:1. Cartilage tissue2. Bone tissue3. Blood tissue4. Adipose tissue5. Connective tissue The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a collection of extracellular biomolecules secreted by cells which offers structural and biochemical support to the surrounding cells.

ECM is composed of fibrous proteins such as collagen, elastin, reticular fibers, and glycoproteins such as laminin, fibronectin, and proteoglycans that are secreted by cells. The amount and composition of the extracellular matrix varies according to the tissue type.

Connective tissue is a type of tissue that is characterized by having few cells separated by a large amount of extracellular matrix. These tissues provide support, anchor, and connect organs. These tissues also play a role in energy storage, protection against pathogens, and the production of blood cells.

To know more about large visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31563277

#SPJ11

Answer:

I would say yes if Im wrong im deeply sorry

Step-by-step explanation:

In this cases, The two angles of elevation are 36° and 144°

To find the two angles of elevation for a projectile to reach a target 13 km downrange with an initial speed of 425 m/sec, we can use the projectile motion formula:

range (R) = (v² * sin(2 * angle)) / g

where v is the initial speed (425 m/sec), angle is the angle of elevation, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s²).

We need to solve for angle.

First, convert the range to meters:

13 km = 13,000 m.

Next, plug the values into the formula:

13,000 = (425² * sin(2 * angle)) / 9.81

Now, solve for angle:

sin(2 * angle) = (13,000 * 9.81) / 425²

sin(2 * angle) ≈ 0.7387

Now, find the two angles using the arcsin function:

2 * angle = arcsin(0.7387)

angle = 0.5 * arcsin(0.7387)

There are two angles that will result in the same range:

angle_1 = 0.5 * arcsin(0.7387)

angle_2 = 180 - angle_1

Calculating the values:

angle_1 ≈ 36° angle_2 ≈ 144°

So, the two angles of elevation that will enable a projectile to reach a target 13 km downrange on the same level as the gun with an initial speed of 425 m/sec are approximately 36° and 144°.

Learn more about angle of elevation at

https://brainly.com/question/12951657

#SPJ11

Answer:

32

Step-by-step explanation:

The length of AC as per he sine of an angle is 32.

The sine of an angle is the ratio of the height and the hypotenuse of the triangle.

Given, ∠C = 30°

AB = 16

Therefore, sin ∠C = (AB/AC)

Therefore, sin (30°) = 16/AC

⇒ (1/2) = 16/AC

⇒ AC = 2 × 16

⇒ AC = 32

Learn more about the sine of an angle here: https://brainly.com/question/22688137

#SPJ3

Using exponential function it will take approximately 2.6 years for the population to reach 26676

Exponential function, as its name suggests, involves exponents. But note that, an exponential function has a constant as its base and a variable as its exponent but not the other way round (if a function has a variable as the base and a constant as the exponent then it is a power function but not an exponential function). An exponential function can be in one of the following forms.

The formula given in this question is

P(t) = 988(3.5)ˣ

The time it will take to reach a population of 26676 is

26676 = 988(3.5)ˣ

x = 2.6 years

It will take approximately 2.6 years

Learn more on exponential function here;

https://brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

Answer:

2 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

−45+3310=?

The fractions have unlike denominators. First, find the Least Common Denominator and rewrite the fractions with the common denominator.

LCD(-4/5, 33/10) = 10

Multiply both the numerator and denominator of each fraction by the number that makes its denominator equal the LCD. This is basically multiplying each fraction by 1.

(−45×22)+(33/10×11)=?

Complete the multiplication and the equation becomes

−8/10+33/10=?

The two fractions now have like denominators so you can add the numerators.

Then:

−8+33/10=25/10

This fraction can be reduced by dividing both the numerator and denominator by the Greatest Common Factor of 25 and 10 using

GCF(25,10) = 5

25÷5/10÷5=5/2

The fraction

52

is the same as

5÷2

Convert to a mixed number using

long division for 5 ÷ 2 = 2R1, so

52=212

Therefore:

−4/5+33/10= 2 1/2

Answer:

a = 0 or a = -7

Step-by-step explanation:

We are going to solve this quadratic equation by factorizing.

a² - 7a = 0

a(a - 7) = 0

a = 0 or a - 7 = 0

a = 0 or a = -7

Answer:

54 years

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Let :

Ann's age = x

Mary's age = x/2

Donald's age = x/3

x + x/2 + x/3 = 99

Take the L. C. M

(6x + 3x + 2x) / 6 = 99

11x / 6 = 99

11x = 99 * 6

11x = 594

x = 594 / 11

x = 54

Hence, Ann is 54 years

Answer:

Combine like terms by subtracting

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1.5

Step-by-step explanation: half an hour is 28 dollars. if he worked for 1 hour, it would be 186 +28 which was the left over amount of money to add up to 214, simply put, 1 hour and 30 minutes or 1.5 hours

Answer: You put this in math when this is french, if you want this in english, the translation is ”what was the temperature at noon that day”

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The maximum  volume is 35316.4 in^3.

Step-by-step explanation:

Length + width + height is less than equal to 62 inches

Height = width = W

Let the length is L .

\(L + W + W = 62 \\\\L= 62 - 2 W\\\\Volume, V = L W H\\\\V = (62 - 2 W)\times W \times W\\\\V = 62 W^2 - 2 W^3\\\\\frac{dV}{dW}=124 W - 6 W^2\\\\So, \frac{dV}{dW} =0\\\\124 = 6 W\\\\W = 20.67 inches\)

So, the maximum volume is

\(V =124\times 20.67\times 20.67 - 2 \times 20.67^3\\\\V =52978.86 - 17662.46 = 35316.4 inch^3\)

By definition of perimeter and consecutive side, we conclude that the side lengths of the triangle with perimeter of 141 centimeters are 46, 47 and 48 centimeters.

The three sides of a triangle are consecutive if and only if they are represented by three consecutive natural numbers. The perimeter is the sum of the three side lengths, whose formula is presented below:

x + (x + 1) + (x + 2) = 141

3 · x + 3 = 141

3 · (x + 1) = 141

x + 1 = 47

x = 46

By definition of perimeter and consecutive side, we conclude that the side lengths of the triangle with perimeter of 141 centimeters are 46, 47 and 48 centimeters.

The statement is complete, the correct statement is the following:

The triangle has three consecutive sides and its perimeter is 141 centimeters. Work out the value of each side.

To learn more on triangles: https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ1

Answer:16288.xy

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the information, the error officer is making is not taking into account the total evidence. (Option D)

The principle of total evidence suggests using all the available observation or evidence when estimating a probability. Hence, to meet total evidence requirement (RTE) not only evidence in favor of a claim but also against it must be considered. The RTE is a basic maxim for non-deductive inference, specifying that evidence must be considered if it has relevance to an inference. The principle of total evidence is tied to inductive inference or reasoning, which is always probabilistic. Total evidence is a tool of decision-making, where the decision is to accept or reject a certain theory/hypothesis on inductive grounds. Hence, logical probability is translated into the (inductive) degree of confirmation of a hypothesis or theory, and that 'logical probability' had to be based on the total evidence available at the time. In the given case, the error the officer is making is not considering the total evidence as she is considering the probability to support her claim but not against it.

Note: The question is incomplete as it is missing options which are a. base rate neglect b. ignoring survivor bias c. heads I win, tails we’re even d. not taking into account the total evidence e. nothing is wrong with her reasoning.

Learn more about Inductive inference:

https://brainly.com/question/8369124

#SPJ4

Assuming max value is an integer. int max(int x, int y) { if (x > y){ return x; } else { return y; } }.The function call max(4, 7) is a valid function call.

A valid function call for the given function would be:
max(4, 7)
Here's the step-by-step explanation:
1. The function definition is:
int max(int x, int y) {
 if (x > y){
   return x;
 } else {
   return y;
 }
}
2. In the function call, we need to provide two integer values as arguments to the function. For example, max(4, 7).
3. In this case, the first argument is 4 and the second argument is 7.
4. The function compares the two arguments using the if statement. Since 4 is greater than 7, the condition x > y is true.
5. As a result, the function returns the value of x, which is 4.
Therefore, the function call max(4, 7) is a valid function call.

To learn more about function

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ11

Therefore, the greatest number of snack bags Maddie can make while dividing the baby carrots and pretzels equally is 4.

To determine the greatest number of snack bags Maddie can make while dividing the baby carrots and pretzels equally, we need to find the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 32 and 44. The GCD represents the largest number that divides both 32 and 44 without leaving a remainder.

To find the GCD, we can use the Euclidean algorithm or any other method of finding the GCD.

Using the Euclidean algorithm:

44 = 32 × 1 + 12

32 = 12 × 2 + 8

12 = 8 × 1 + 4

8 = 4 × 2 + 0

The remainder becomes 0, so the GCD of 32 and 44 is 4.

To know more about greatest number,

https://brainly.com/question/17807197

#SPJ11

Answer:

Student C wrote the correct inequality

the inequality will be less than or equal to since we want to spend (exactly) 300 or less. We only buy one jacket for 60 dollars so it will be added seperately to the total number of jackets. We are buying multiple jackets and each jacket costs $40. P = # of pants. So the inequality will look like

60 + 40P (less than or equal to symbol) 300

Hope I'm not too late :)

The amount of plastic wrap used to wrap the container is 3.06π square inches.

What is cylinder ?

A cylinder is a multi object used in geometry that has a round base, a curving surface rising from it, and another circular shape at the top or lid. One way to visualize a cylinder is as a stack of infinitely thin circular discs stacked one on top of the other. The height and radius of a cylinder, which measure the distance from the base to the top and the edge of the circular base, respectively, determine the shape of the object.

The plastic wrap covers the entire surface area of the cylinder. The formula for the surface area of a cylinder is:

Surface area of cylinder = 2πr² + 2πrh

where r is the radius of the circular base of the cylinder, and h is the height of the cylinder.

We can use the given diameter of the circular base, which is 1.8 inches, to find the radius r:

r = d/2 = 1.8/2 = 0.9 inches

We are also given the height of the rectangle, which is 0.8 inches.

Now we can substitute the values of r and h into the formula for the surface area of the cylinder:

Surface area of cylinder = 2π(0.9)² + 2π(0.9)(0.8)

Surface area of cylinder = 2π(0.81) + 2π(0.72)

Surface area of cylinder = 1.62π + 1.44π

Surface area of cylinder = 3.06π square inches

Therefore, the amount of plastic wrap used to wrap the container is 3.06π square inches.

To know more about surface area visit:

brainly.com/question/29101132

#SPJ1

Answer:

\(\huge\boxed{\sf \$11.95}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

6 tickets = $71.70

Using unitary method.

6/6 ticket = $71.70/6

\(\rule[225]{225}{2}\)

The probability that Sue will hit the bullseye on her next toss is approximately 0.29 or 29%.

What is probability?

The experimental probability of an event is defined as the ratio of the number of times the event occurs to the total number of trials or observations. In this case, Sue hit the bullseye 4 times out of 14 total trials (4 hits + 10 misses).

Therefore, the experimental probability that Sue will hit the bullseye on her next toss is:

4 hits / 14 total trials = 0.2857 or approximately 0.29

So the probability that Sue will hit the bullseye on her next toss is approximately 0.29 or 29%.

To know more about probability, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ1

Complete question is:  Sue is playing darts. So far, she has hit the bullseye 4 times and missed the bullseye 10 times. the probability that Sue will hit the bullseye on her next toss is approximately 0.29 or 29%.

Answer: 2/7

Step-by-step explanation: i did this question, trust me

The solution of the equation 1/3 (1/2 x - 9) = 1/2 (x + 18) will be negative 36.

An answer to a formula is any variable value that fulfills the equal outcomes, that is, it tends to make the Left Hand Side (LHS) and Right Hand Side (RHS) of the formula equal. To solve an equation, you must locate the feasible solution) to that formula.

The equation is given below.

1/3 (1/2 x - 9) = 1/2 (x + 18)

Simplify the equation, then we have

1/3 (1/2 x - 9) = 1/2 (x + 18)

(1/6)x - 3 = (1/2)x + 9

(1/2)x - (1/6)x = - 3 - 9

(1/3)x = - 12

x = - 36

The solution of the equation 1/3 (1/2 x - 9) = 1/2 (x + 18) will be negative 36.

More about the solution of the equation link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/29797035

#SPJ9

The correct equation is given below.

find the value of 'x'

1/3(1/2x-9)=1/2(x+18)

Answer:

135

Step-by-step explanation:

The max value is where the far right point of the "whisker" is.

The function is f(x) = -2x + 5, and the constants m and b are -2 and 5, respectively.

Given the function f(x) = mx + b, where m and b are constants, we know that:

limx→2 f(x) = 1

limx→3 f(x) = -1

Using the definition of a limit, we can rewrite these statements as:

For any ε > 0, there exists δ1 > 0 such that if 0 < |x - 2| < δ1, then |f(x) - 1| < ε.

For any ε > 0, there exists δ2 > 0 such that if 0 < |x - 3| < δ2, then |f(x) + 1| < ε.

We want to determine the values of m and b that satisfy these conditions. To do so, we will use the fact that if a function has a limit as x approaches a point, then the left-hand and right-hand limits must exist and be equal to each other. In other words, we need to ensure that the left-hand and right-hand limits of f(x) exist and are equal to the given limits.

Let's start by finding the left-hand limit of f(x) as x approaches 2. We have:

limx→2- f(x) = limx→2- (mx + b) = 2m + b

Next, we find the right-hand limit of f(x) as x approaches 2:

limx→2+ f(x) = limx→2+ (mx + b) = 2m + b

Since the limit as x approaches 2 exists, we know that the left-hand and right-hand limits must be equal. Thus, we have:

2m + b = 1

Similarly, we can find the left-hand and right-hand limits of f(x) as x approaches 3:

limx→3- f(x) = limx→3- (mx + b) = 3m + b

limx→3+ f(x) = limx→3+ (mx + b) = 3m + b

Since the limit as x approaches 3 exists, we know that the left-hand and right-hand limits must be equal. Thus, we have:

3m + b = -1

We now have two equations:

2m + b = 1

3m + b = -1

We can solve for m and b by subtracting the first equation from the second:

m = -2

Substituting this value of m into one of the equations above, we can solve for b:

2(-2) + b = 1

b = 5

Learn more about limit at: brainly.com/question/12207539

#SPJ11

To improve the design of this experiment, the researchers could have used a double-blind design, where both the participants and the researchers are unaware of the group allocation.

In the given experiment, the researchers have not employed any form of blinding, which could be a potential source of bias. Blinding is a critical aspect of experimental design, where the participants or the researchers are unaware of the group allocation or the treatment being administered. Blinding is used to eliminate any potential sources of bias that may arise due to the expectations or beliefs of the researchers or participants. In this particular study, the lack of blinding could have led to two possible sources of bias. Firstly, the participants in the first group who received the meditation session could have had higher expectations of improvement in their flexibility due to the meditation. These expectations could have led to higher motivation and effort during the flexibility measurement, leading to an artificial improvement in their flexibility scores. Secondly, the researchers who were measuring the flexibility of the participants could have been biased towards finding a difference between the groups due to their knowledge of the group allocation. This could have led to a subconscious alteration in the measurement process, leading to a false conclusion about the effect of meditation on flexibility.

hence To improve the design of this experiment, the researchers could have used a double-blind design, where both the participants and the researchers are unaware of the group allocation. For instance, the participants could have been assigned a unique identification number, and the researchers could have used coded labels to differentiate the groups. This would have eliminated any potential sources of bias due to expectations or beliefs and would have made the results more reliable.

To know more about double-blind design click here:

brainly.com/question/30450870

#SPJ4

Answer:

1 1/6

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3 - (-5/6)

Subtracting a negative is like adding

1/3 + 5/6

Get a common denominator of 6

1/3 *2/2 + 5/6

2/6 + 5/6

7/6

6/6 + 1/6

1 1/6

Answer: -1 1/6

Step-by-step explanation: -5/6 - 1/3 (2/2) -5/6 - 2/6 -7/6 -1 1/6