find and write all the angles figure
I need it please fast and I will mark brainlist ​

Answer:

5.2

Step-by-step explanation:

The most effective chunking of the digit sequence 14929111776 would depend on the purpose of chunking.

However, a possible effective chunking could be 14-92-91-11-77-6, which groups the digits into pairs or triplets based on their similarity or pattern. Another possible chunking could be 1492-911-1776, which separates the digits based on significant historical events. Ultimately, the effectiveness of chunking would depend on the context and intended use of the sequence. The most effective chunking of the digit sequence 14929111776 would be to group the numbers into smaller, manageable chunks. One possible way to chunk the sequence is: 149-29-11-17-76. This breaks the sequence into five groups, making it easier to remember and process.

To know more about digit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30142622

#SPJ11

Answer:

YI =1, XI=7

Step-by-step explanation:

Using linear function to solve this problem, for every 1 gallon of gas, Francisco travelled 27.9 miles

A linear function is a function that represents a straight line on the coordinate plane. For example, y = 3x - 2 represents a straight line on a coordinate plane and hence it represents a linear function. Since y can be replaced with f(x), this function can be written as f(x) = 3x - 2. A linear function is of the form f(x) = mx + b where 'm' and 'b' are real numbers. Isn't it looking like the slope-intercept form of a line which is expressed as y = mx + b? Yes, this is because a linear function represents a line, i.e., its graph is a line. where m is slope of the line and b is the y - intercept

We can use the data given in writing out our equation

390.6 = 14x

If 14 gallons = 390.6 miles

 1 gallon = x miles

x = 390.6 / 14

x = 27.9 miles

learn more on linear function here;

https://brainly.com/question/15602982

#SPJ1

The dollar gains depreciated relative to the pound when the price of pounds in dollars increases, for instance, from $1 = 1 pound to $2 = 1 pound.

Devaluation of a currency can take place in both absolute and relative terms. When the value of one currency declines in relation to the values of other currencies, this is referred to as a relative devaluation. For instance, the British pound sterling may be worth more today than it did yesterday in terms of US dollars.

A currency's value declines when compared to other currencies, which is known as currency depreciation. Political unrest, interest rate differences, weak economic fundamentals, and investor risk aversion are a few examples of the causes of currency devaluation.

To know more about  Depreciated relative visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13522166

#SPJ4

For given number 100

the exponent form = 10²

the word form = One Hundred

For given question,

The area of a closet is 100 square feet.

We need to write the number in exponent form and word form.

First we write given number in exponent form

⇒ 100 = 10 × 10

⇒ 100 = 10²

So, the exponent form given number 100 is 10²

And the word form of given number is : One Hundred

Therefore, for given number 100

the exponent form = 10²

the word form = One Hundred

Learn more about the exponent form and word form here:

https://brainly.com/question/577797

#SPJ4

Check the picture below.

\(\cfrac{17.5+14}{17.5}~~ = ~~\cfrac{x}{12.5}\implies \cfrac{(17.5+14)(12.5)}{17.5}~~ = ~~x\implies 22.5=x\)

Answer: The answer for this question is C.

Answer:

3x=15

Step-by-step explanation:

3(5)=15 it's the only one where x can be 5

Answer:

s=555

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of the expression \(2[32-(4-1)]\) is \(58\) by simplifying.

Simplification is the process of replacing a mathematical expression with an equivalent one, that is simpler and usually shorter.

Apply the BODMAS rule to simplify the algebraic expression.

Given that the expression is \(2[32-(4-1)]\)

First, simplify the bracket \((4-1)\)

Then, \(2[32-(4-1)]=2[32-3]\)

Simplify the bracket \([32-3]\)

Then, \(2[32-3]=2\) × \(29\)

Multiply the numbers \(2\) and \(29\)

\(2\) × \(29=58\)

Hence, the expression \(2[32-(4-1)]\) is simplified to \(58\).

Learn more about simplification here-https://brainly.com/question/17579585

#SPJ2

There having 23 or fewer people getting allergy relief would be considered an unusually small number within the 48 allergy sufferers.

To determine what would be considered an unusually small number of people within the 48 that get allergy relief, we can use the concept of statistical significance.

Given that the medication provides allergy relief in 75% of people, we can expect that, on average, 75% of the 48 allergy sufferers would experience relief. Therefore, the expected number of people who get allergy relief is 0.75 * 48 = 36.

To identify an unusually small number, we can consider values that deviate significantly from the expected value. In this case, we can use a statistical test to determine if the observed number of people getting allergy relief is significantly lower than the expected value.

One common approach is to use the binomial distribution and calculate the probability of observing a number of successes (people getting allergy relief) less than or equal to a certain threshold by chance alone.

If this probability is very low (below a pre-defined significance level, typically 0.05), we can consider the number of people falling below that threshold as unusually small.

In this case, let's assume a significance level of 0.05. We can calculate the cumulative probability of observing fewer than or equal to a certain number of successes using the binomial distribution

where:

- X is the number of people getting allergy relief,

- n is the total number of allergy sufferers (48 in this case),

- k is the threshold we want to test (an unusually small number),

- p is the probability of success (0.75).

We can calculate the cumulative probabilities for different values of k and find the smallest value of k for which the cumulative probability is less than or equal to 0.05. This value of k will mark the boundary for unusually small numbers.

Using statistical software or a binomial distribution calculator, we find that P(X ≤ 23) is approximately 0.0308, which is below 0.05.

Therefore, having 23 or fewer people getting allergy relief would be considered an unusually small number within the 48 allergy sufferers.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The rectangle that shows the same relationship as described in the problem is the one represented by Option 2: Width = x, Length = 2x - 13.

Let's analyze the relationship given in the problem:

The width of the rectangle is denoted as x.

The length of the rectangle is 13 less than twice its width, which can be expressed as:

Length = 2 * Width - 13

To find the rectangle that shows the same relationship, we need to examine the options and match the corresponding width and length expressions.

Let's consider the options:

Option 1: Width = 2x - 13, Length = x

Option 2: Width = x, Length = 2x - 13

Option 3: Width = x + 13, Length = 2x

Option 4: Width = 2x, Length = x - 13

Analyzing the options:

Option 1: Width = 2x - 13, Length = x

This option does not match the given relationship. The length expression is incorrect.

Option 2: Width = x, Length = 2x - 13

This option matches the given relationship. The length expression is correct: twice the width minus 13.

Option 3: Width = x + 13, Length = 2x

This option does not match the given relationship. The length expression is incorrect.

Option 4: Width = 2x, Length = x - 13

This option does not match the given relationship. The length expression is incorrect.

Therefore, the rectangle that shows the same relationship as described in the problem is the one represented by Option 2: Width = x, Length = 2x - 13.

for such more question on rectangle

https://brainly.com/question/17297081

#SPJ8

Question

A rectangle has a width of x and a length that is 13 less than twice its width. Which rectangle shows the same relationship?

F(3) is equal to 9, based on the given table and the corresponding values of x and f(x). Option D.

To find the value of F(3) based on the given table, we look at the corresponding x-value of 3 and find its corresponding f(x) value.

From the table, we see that when x = 3, f(x) = 9. Therefore, F(3) = 9.

The table shows the values of x and their corresponding f(x) values. We can see that when x increases by 1, f(x) also increases by 3. This indicates that the function has a constant rate of change, where the change in f(x) is always 3 units for every 1 unit change in x.

Given that F(3) represents the value of the function when x = 3, we look at the x-values in the table and find the corresponding f(x) value. In this case, when x = 3, f(x) = 9.

Therefore, the value of F(3) is 9. Option D is correct.

For more such question on values. visit :

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ8

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

In the image, there is only one section that is above 2 1/4 and below 2 3/4, which  is 2 1/2. there are 6 crosses on 2 1/2, indicating 6 students

Answer:

Whers the pic

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

it depends on how many females are there

Step-by-step explanation:

I need to know how many females are there

Answer: If there are x total members, then the number of males is 5/8x

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

This is an inverse

x = 1/9y -2

x+2 = 1/9y

y = 9x+18

Explanation:

1 hat = 45 dollars

6 hats = 6*45 = 270 dollars

1 phone = 40 dollars

4 phones = 4*40 = 160 dollars

total = $270 + $160 = $430

Felicia spent a total of $430. Since this amount of money leaves her account, this means we write a negative sign out front to end up with the final answer of -430

In other words, her account balance went down by $430 which is why we use a negative. If someone gave her $430, then the answer would be positive.

Answer:

Circumference ~ 53.4

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the distance formula to get the radius of the circle. The radius is about 8.5. Now put 8.5 into the formula 2(pi)r for the Circumference. Rounding to the nearest tenth the answer is 53.4

First, we want to note two things:

We can describe this with an inequality:  x ≥ -10
Be sure you use ≥ and not >, since -10 is included.

We can describe this with interval notation: [ -10, infty )
Be sure you use [ and not ( on -10, since -10 is included.

You can also use set-builder notation: { x | x ≥ -10 }

The number of ways to load the cars onto the truck is  \(^{25}C_3\) i.e. 2300 ways.

To find the number of ways to load the cars on the truck we can use the formula for combination, which is given by -

C(n,k) = n! / (k! (n-k)!)

where n is the total number of cars (25), k is the number of cars we want to choose (3)

Using this formula, we can calculate the number of ways to load the cars as follows -

C(25,3) = 25! / (3! (25-3)!) = 252423 / (321) = 2300

Hence, there are 2300 ways to load 3 cars out of 25 onto the truck for transport.

Read more about combinations:

brainly.com/question/11732255

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

AB/AC = BD/DC

2x/12 = x+4/x+1

12x + 4 = 2x² + 2x

2x² - 10x - 48 = 0

x² - 5x - 24 = 0

(x-8) (x+3) = 0

x = 8 (or) x= -3 (impossible)

x = 8

The valid sampling method(s) for obtaining a sample of individuals with high cholesterol from the list provided are simple random sampling, stratified sampling, and cluster sampling.

- Simple random sampling: This method involves randomly selecting 40 individuals from the list of 6800 individuals.

- Stratified sampling: This method involves dividing the list of 6800 individuals into different strata  based on relevant characteristics.

- Cluster sampling: This method involves dividing the list of 6800 individuals into smaller clusters (e.g., primary care physician offices or geographical areas).

This method is useful when it is difficult or costly to reach individuals scattered across a wide area.

Each of these methods has its advantages and disadvantages, so the choice depends on the specific needs and constraints of the pharmaceutical company.

To know more about sampling visit:

brainly.com/question/30269161

#SPJ11

The correct answer is Option B. There'll be 70 kg/ha organic carbon would be saved annually by using reduced tillage.

Reduced tillage, also known as conservation tillage, is a practice that minimizes the disturbance of the soil and helps to maintain organic carbon in the soil. This practice can help to improve soil health, reduce erosion, and increase water retention.
One study found that reduced tillage can increase organic carbon levels in the soil by 70 kg/ha (kilograms per hectare) per year. This is equivalent to 70,000 g/ha (grams per hectare) per year. Therefore, the correct answer is option B. 70 kg/ha.
In conclusion, reduced tillage can help to increase organic carbon levels in the soil, leading to improved soil health and other benefits. The amount of organic carbon saved annually by using reduced tillage is 70 kg/ha.

To learn more about Organic Carbon, click here
brainly.com/question/13231783

#SPJ11

The statement "For all integers a, b, and c, if gcd(a, b) = 1 and c | (a + b), then gcd(a, c) = 1 and gcd(b, c) = 1" is TRUE for all integers a, b, and c.

How to justify your conclusion that the proposition is true?The proof is required to demonstrate that the proposition is true.

Consider the following two statements:

If gcd(a, b) = 1, then there exists x and y, integers, such that ax + by = 1.

[Euclid's Lemma]a and b are coprime (that is, gcd(a, b) = 1) if and only if there exist integers x and y such that ax + by = 1.

[Bezout's Theorem]Here are the steps for proving that the proposition is true:

If gcd(a, b) = 1, then there exist integers x and y such that ax + by = 1.

Multiplying the previous equation by c yields cax + cby = c, which is equivalent to c | (a + b).

We must now demonstrate that if c | (a + b), then gcd(a, c) = 1 and gcd(b, c) = 1.

To accomplish this, suppose d is a common divisor of a and c.

Then, there exist integers x and y such that a = dx and c = dy.

Therefore, c | (a + b) means that dy | dx + b, which simplifies to d | b.

Thus, gcd(a, c) = d and d | b, so d is a common divisor of b and c.

The greatest common divisor of b and c is gcd(b, c), which is no more than d because d is a common divisor.

Similarly, gcd(b, c) is a divisor of a and c if d is a divisor of b and c.

If gcd(a, b) = 1 and c | (a + b), then gcd(a, c) = 1 and gcd(b, c) = 1.

This is true because of Euclid's lemma, which states that if a common divisor d divides two integers a and b, then it also divides their linear combination.

Therefore, gcd(a, c) and gcd(b, c) divide gcd(a, b) = 1, which means they are also equal to 1.

The proof is now complete.

The statement is true for all integers a, b, and c.

To know more about common divisor  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27962046

#SPJ11

Answer:

40 is greater than 6

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of having no spelling mistakes on at least one of the four pages is 1 - 0.0081 = 0.9919, or approximately 0.99 when rounded to the nearest hundredth.

To find the probability that Julia will have no spelling mistakes on at least one of the four pages, we can use the complement rule. That is, we can find the probability that she has at least one page with a spelling mistake, and then subtract that probability from 1.

The probability of having no spelling mistakes on a page is 0.7, so the probability of having at least one spelling mistake on a page is 1 - 0.7 = 0.3.

Assuming Julia is equally likely to have a spelling mistake on each of the four pages, the probability of having at least one spelling mistake on all four pages is 0.3 x 0.3 x 0.3 x 0.3 = 0.0081.

Therefore, the probability of having no spelling mistakes on at least one of the four pages is 1 - 0.0081 = 0.9919, or approximately 0.99 when rounded to the nearest hundredth.

So, the final answer is:

P(at least one without mistakes) = 0.99

To solve this problem, we can find the probability that Julia will have spelling mistakes on all 4 pages, and then subtract that from 1 to find the probability of her having no spelling mistakes on at least one page.

1. First, find the probability of having a spelling mistake on a single page. Since there's a 0.7 probability of having no mistakes, there is a 1 - 0.7 = 0.3 probability of having a spelling mistake on a page.

2. Next, find the probability of having spelling mistakes on all 4 pages. Since the events are independent, we multiply the probabilities: 0.3 * 0.3 * 0.3 * 0.3 = 0.0081.

3. Finally, subtract the probability of having spelling mistakes on all 4 pages from 1 to find the probability of having no spelling mistakes on at least one page: 1 - 0.0081 = 0.9919.

Round your answer to the nearest hundredth: 0.9919 ≈ 0.99.

The probability that Julia will have no spelling mistakes on at least one page is approximately 0.99.

Learn more about probability at: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Answer:

3 beverages, 5 appetizers, 8 entrees, and 4 desserts.

Step-by-step explanation:

I think you meant 20 items, so let's do that. To find 15% of 20, we multiply 20 by .15. This gets us 3. We repeat this with all the other numbers, using different decimals, of course. We get 3 beverages, 5 appetizers, 8 entrees, and 4 desserts. 3 + 5 + 8 + 4 is 20, so everything checks out.