The crime manage version of crook justice and the due system version are the 2 essential crook justice models.
The required details for Criminal justice in given paragraph
Criminal justice is the shipping of justice to the ones who've been accused of committing crimes. The crook justice gadget is a sequence of government corporations and establishments. Goals consist of the rehabilitation of offenders, stopping different crimes, and ethical guide for victims. The number one establishments of the crook justice gadget are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and the prisons gadget. The first touch a defendant has with the crook justice gadget is normally with the police (or regulation enforcement) who investigates the suspected wrongdoing and makes an arrest, however if the suspect is risky to the entire nation, a countrywide level regulation enforcement agency is referred to as in. When warranted, regulation enforcement corporations or law enforcement officials are empowered to apply pressure and different sorts of felony coercion and method to impact public and social order.
The time period is maximum typically related to police departments of a kingdom which can be legal to workout the police power of that kingdom inside a described felony or territorial place of responsibility.
To know about Criminal justice click here
https://brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is correct regarding government action challenged under the Due Process or Equal Protection Clause where no fundamental right or suspect or quasi-suspect classification is involved?
A. The burden of proof is on the government to show that the law is necessary
B. The law is valid only if it is substantially related to a legitimate government purpose
C. The law must be the least burdensome means to achieve the legislative goal
D. The law will be upheld unless it is arbitrary
The following statement is correct regarding government action challenged under the Due Process or Equal Protection Clause where no fundamental right or suspect or quasi-suspect classification is involved and that the law is valid only if it is substantially related to a legitimate government purpose. Option B.
What is the Due Process Clause?The Due Process Clause is a provision of the Constitution's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments that guarantees people's basic legal rights. These rights are designed to shield people from unreasonable or unjustified government interference.
What is the Equal Protection Clause?The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This clause demands that all people be treated equally under the law, prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, or national origin.
Therefore, the statement which is correct regarding government action challenged under the Due Process or Equal Protection Clause where no fundamental right or suspect or quasi-suspect classification is involved is that the law is valid only if it is substantially related to a legitimate government purpose.
Hence, the right answer is option B.
Read more about Government Action at https://brainly.com/question/30879525
#SPJ11
Common law is a body of cases decided by legislatures.
No, it is absolutely incorrect to be mentioning the fact that common law is a body of cases decides upon by the legislatures. So, the given statement is false.
The Common Law may be generally taken into interpretation as the decisions that have been taken by the judges while making an understanding a statutory provision, or any such legal sources, which are then relied on by the other judges, and such laws continue to hold a greater degree of precedence. Thus, the above-mentioned statement is not true at all.
Learn more about common law here:
https://brainly.com/question/13070537
#SPJ4
Complete question
Assume the above question as a TRUE/FALSE question
Common law is a body of cases decided by legislatures.
distinguish social behavior and legal behavior for example
Answer:
What is the difference between ethical behavior and legal behavior?
The distinction is important. Actions are 'legal' if they do not violate the laws or codes of the local government, state, or federal government. ... A formally adopted code of ethics is a legal requirement; when you violate a state or local government code of ethics there are specific consequences.
Explanation:
A motorist is required to yield right-of-way to buses re-entering traffic after dropping off, or picking up, bus passengers
True or false
Answer:
very True, with an increasing severity of punishment depending on the state laws. It could be fineable up to hundreds of dollars, because the motorist is putting pedestrian lives in danger when they don't.
Which problem has been found recently in the system of special districts?a. State investigations have discovered numerous "phantom districts" that do not provide a service, yet bill the local counties for administrative costs.b. Some districts have dealt with people buying property just outside the district boundaries and then demanding services from the district without having to pay for them.c. There has been widespread corruption among board members receiving bribes from citizens to lower their user fees.d. Real estate developers have moved a few people onto land, rent free, who then vote for huge bond measures that future residents are obliged to pay.e. The special districts for homeland security throughout Texas were uncoordinated and ill- prepared for September 11, 2001.
The problem that has been found recently in the system of special districts is a. State investigations have discovered numerous "phantom districts" that do not provide a service, yet bill the local counties for administrative costs.
In recent times, state investigations have uncovered the existence of special districts that are labeled as "phantom districts." These districts do not actually provide any services to the local communities but still bill the counties for administrative costs. This discovery has raised concerns about the misuse of public funds and the lack of accountability within the special district system.
These phantom districts create an unfair burden on the local counties as they are required to allocate resources for administrative expenses without receiving any corresponding services in return. This problem highlights the need for increased transparency, oversight, and stricter regulations to prevent such fraudulent practices within the special district framework.
learn more about bill here
https://brainly.com/question/15266436
#SPJ11
federalist 39 if the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible
In Federalist 39, Alexander Hamilton argues that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government.
What does Federalist 39 say ?Hamilton acknowledges that the Constitution does not create a pure democracy, in which all laws are made directly by the people. However, he argues that this is not necessary for a government to be considered a republic. He points out that even in a pure democracy, the people must delegate some of their power to representatives.
Hamilton concludes that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government and that its advocates should not abandon it simply because it is not a pure democracy. He defines a republic as "a government in which the scheme of representation takes place."
Find out more on the Federalist papers at https://brainly.com/question/233891
#SPJ4
List four (4) exceptions for obtaining a search warrant to search a house, car, or person. For each exception given, provide a brief example.
Answer:
I was personally taught 11 exceptions to obtaining a search warrant. I've chosen the four that I think are the most common.
(1) Consent – A warrant is not needed if the person gives the officer their permission to search their things without one. If an officer asks "may I search your car" and the driver says "yes", a warrant isn't needed.
(2) Plain View – If the objects are in "plain view", a warrant isn't required to conduct a search. An officer doesn't need a warrant to observe that which can clearly be seen in a place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
(3) Evanescent Evidence – If the officer has reason to believe that a person will destroy the evidence in the time it will take to get a warrant, places may be searched without one.
(4) Hot Pursuit – Any attempt a person makes to physically escape before the officer is done with them is grounds for arrest without a warrant, and anything the officer comes across, sees, or walks by in their pursuit of them, is automatically searchable without a warrant.
under the child abuse and neglect reporting act a mandated reporter is required to report suspected abuse to
Answer:
local child protective authorities
Explanation:
under the child abuse and neglect reporting act a mandated reporter is required to report suspected abuse to local child protective authorities.
Jocelyn Stay silent Confess Brian and Jocelyn are arrested and charged with armed robbery. The police interview both suspects separately about their involvement in the crime. Each suspect has to make a decision. They can betray the other suspect by confessing that they both committed the crime, or they can cooperate with the other suspect by remaining silent. The table shows the sentences that Brian and Jocelyn will receive given their choices. Use the table to answer the question. Jocelyn gets 10 years Jocelyn gets 5 years Stay silent Brian gets 10 years Brian gets 15 years Brian Jocelyn gets 15 years Jocelyn gets 12 years What will be the dominant strategy outcome for Brian and Jocelyn? Confess Brian gets 5 years Brian gets 12 years Jocelyn gets 5 years, and Brian gets 15 years. They both get 12 years. They both get 10 years. O Brian gets 5 years, and Jocelyn gets 15 years. Coca-Cola Strategy 1 Strategy 2 B
The dominant strategy outcome for Brian and Jocelyn would be to confess. This is because if one confesses, and the other stays silent, the one who confesses gets a lower sentence (5 years) than if they both stayed silent (10 years). Additionally, if both confess, they both get a lower sentence (12 years) than if they both stayed silent (10 years) or if one stayed silent and the other confessed (15 years). Therefore, confessing is the most beneficial strategy for both suspects.
Confession in law refers to a statement made by an individual admitting to committing a crime or offence. Confessions can be made voluntarily or obtained through coercion, and their admissibility in court depends on various factors, including the circumstances under which they were obtained and the reliability of the statement. Confessions are often considered to be strong evidence in criminal cases, but the use of coerced confessions is prohibited under the law. Additionally, the admissibility of confessions may be challenged by the defence if there is evidence of coercion, duress, or other factors that may undermine their credibility. Ultimately, the use of confessions in legal proceedings is complex and subject to various legal standards and procedures.
Learn more about Confession: https://brainly.com/question/31088899.
#SPJ11
What does memorandum decision in appellate court mean
Answer:
A court's decision that gives the ruling (what it decides and orders done), but no opinion (reasons for the decision).
A memorandum decision is not subject to appeal by the dissatisfied party.
What are the 4 characteristics of a political state?.
Political parties are characterized by gaining power, pursuing an ideology, having a common agenda, forming a government, and acting as a liaison between the people and the government. A political party is a group of people who come together to contest elections and control governments. Leader, devoted member and supporter are her three main characteristics of a political party. They attain power as well.
A political party is a group that organizes candidates for public office in a particular country. Political parties may support specific ideologies or political goals, and it is common for party members to hold similar political views.
The absence of specific constitutional provisions prohibiting or permitting the development of local and regional parties, capable opposition and independent party members, and the establishment of political parties and civil society is a hallmark of India's multi-party system. Political parties are characterized by:
This is the main goal of all political parties.
Acquisition of power. They are competing for the same things, and there is nothing wrong with striving for power as long as the rivalry is fair. It is defined by what it corresponds to. Today, most political parties share similar views, making it difficult for the average voter to choose a political party.
Have a Common Agenda: Parties develop agendas based on their respective philosophies. To win elections and carry out their plans, they want to win the public.
Government Formation: The government is formed by the party that receives the most votes. Opposition parties are made up of parties with the fewest votes.
Role in connecting people and government: People and government are linked through political parties. They channel public concerns and inquiries to elected officials, and governments gather public support for their policies and programs through political parties.
Learn more about Attain power:
https://brainly.com/question/9383826
#SPJ4
True or False: After coming to a complete stop, motorists are not permitted to complete a right turn during a presentation of a CIRCULAR RED signal. A left turn into a left moving one way street is also permitted.
The answer is False.
T/F Well-written social media policies of a firm are consistent with its organizational culture and values.
A company's social media policies should reflect the corporate culture and values of the company. it is true
Social media are interactive media platforms that make it easier to create and share content through online communities and networks, including information, ideas, interests, and other kinds of expression. Despite difficulties in defining social media due to the range of standalone and integrated social media services currently offered, there are certain common characteristics: Social media are Web 2.0 Internet-based interactive apps. The lifeblood of social media is user-generated content, which includes written postings or comments, digital photographs or videos, and statistics from all online interactions.
Learn more about social media from
brainly.com/question/23976852
#SPJ4
How is Congress able to limit the president's ability to influence federal
legislation?
Answer: Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate. (Usually an act is passed with a simple majority.) This check prevents the President from blocking an act when significant support for it exists
The U.S. Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances among the three branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Congress, which is the legislative branch, has several powers that can limit the president's ability to influence federal legislation:
The power to make laws: Congress has the authority to pass laws, and the president cannot make laws on his or her own. The president can suggest legislation, but ultimately, it is up to Congress to pass it.
The power of the purse: Congress controls the federal budget and can use its power of the purse to limit the president's ability to influence legislation. For example, Congress can refuse to fund a particular program or policy that the president supports.
The power to override vetoes: If the president vetoes a bill passed by Congress, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
The power of impeachment: Congress has the power to impeach and remove the president from office for "high crimes and misdemeanors." This power serves as a check on the president's behavior and can limit his or her ability to influence legislation.
The power to investigate: Congress has the authority to investigate the executive branch, including the president, and can use this power to uncover information that can limit the president's ability to influence legislation.
Overall, Congress has a range of powers that can limit the president's ability to influence federal legislation, which helps to maintain the system of checks and balances established by the U.S. Constitution.
4 reasons why minor parties are important in American politics
Answer:
Enduring Minor Parties
Single-Issue Minor Parties.
Candidate-Centered Minor Parties
Fusion Minor Parties.
Explanation:
CAN YOU MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST :)
some states placed restrictions on intrastate and interstate branches. given this development, what law gave the states the legal framework to do this? what additional law closed a potential loophole in interstate banking? what law changed these restrictions?
The McFadden Act of 1927 and other laws that tried to address long-standing concerns about the concentration of financial activity and concerns that large banking organizations operating in multiple states could not be adequately supervised were largely responsible for these restrictions.
Why did we remove restrictions on banking between states?
After it became clear that restrictions on interstate banking restricted banks' ability to expand regionally and made them vulnerable to local economic crises, regulations were eventually relaxed.
What resulted from the Riegle-Neal Act?
Banks can open branches in other states thanks to the Interstate Act, also known as the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
Learn more about banking here:
https://brainly.com/question/25642105
#SPJ4
what type of citizen does a democracy need
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teacher, the principal search is the lockers of three students and finds a pocket knife in one student's locker. The other two lockers turned up nothing. 3) On the high school campus authorities be allowed to search students lockers whenever they want?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
If you want to pass a slow moving vehicle you should do what
Answer:
As long as you're passing in a legal manner either in a passing zone read below.
Explanation:
Use your turn signal to let other drives know you are changing lanes.Check your side and rearview mirrors for traffic approaching from behind.Glance over your left shoulder if you are moving left. Glance over your right shoulder if you are moving right so you can see if there are any vehicles in your blind spot.(passing on a one lane road is completely different but you did not say which you were referring to)
TRUE OR FALSE The law does not give copyright protection to words and phrases, including advertising slogans and titles of books, movies, and television programs. These lack sufficient originality to qualify for copyright protection. However, a trademark can protect these creations.
Words and phrases, such as advertising slogans and the names of books, movies, and television shows, are not protected by copyright under the law. These aren't unique enough to warrant copyright protection. This statement is true.
Words and phrases, such as advertising slogans and the names of books, movies, and television shows, are not protected by copyright under the law.
This is because they lack sufficient originality to qualify for copyright protection. However, these creations can be protected under trademark law.
Trademarks protect brand names, logos, and other identifying marks used in commerce to distinguish the goods or services of one person or company from those of another. Trademarks also protect titles of books, movies, and television programs.
To learn more about copyright protection
https://brainly.com/question/14704862
#SPJ4
The law does not give copyright protection to words and phrases, including advertising slogans and titles of books, movies, and television programs. These lack sufficient originality to qualify for copyright protection. However, a trademark can protect these creations
The above statement is false.
Original works of authorship, such as poetry, books, movies, songs, computer software, and architectural designs are all protected by copyright, a type of intellectual property law.
According to India's copyright law, copyright safeguards the original expression of knowledge and concepts. Copyright can be asserted by the original creator, the person who received ownership rights from the creator, or an authorised agent of the original creator.
The legislation does not provide copyright protection for words and phrases such as advertising catchphrases and the titles of publications, motion pictures, and television programmes.
This is due to the fact that they are not sufficiently original to be protected by copyright. However, trademark law may provide protection for these works.
Brand names, logos, and other distinguishing marks that are used in commerce to separate the goods or services of one person or business from those of another are protected by trademarks. The names of books, movies, and television shows are also protected by trademarks.
For more questions on copyright protection
brainly.com/question/14704862
#SPJ4
If law enforcement has reasonable suspicion that a person is engaged in criminal activity,
an officer may
a. not take any action without a warrant
b. stop and question a person
c.arrest the person
d.search the person
Answer:
not take anybaction without a warrantis the right answer
Who is the complainant in a sexual assault case ?
Answer:
the one whom was assaulted ?
Explanation:
Among other skills and attributes, attorneys should excel in critical thinking skills; communication skills such as listening, reading, writing and speaking; the ability to research and understand information quickly and accurately; and be able to handle potentially stressful situations effectively. In no less than 200 words, describe what you consider to be the most important attributes of a successful attorney and explain what actions a person interested in becoming an attorney can take to develop these skills.
Answer:
Passion for the Job. ...
Compassion for Clients. ...
Great Communication Skills. ...
Willingness to Listen. ...
Knowledge of the Law. ...
Strong Writing Ability. ...
Creativity. ...
Good Judgment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Lawyers must have strong oral communication skills and written communication skills to accurately relay critical legal information. As well, a significant portion of a lawyer's job is to create strong and convincing arguments which are presented in the courtroom.
Explanation:
The Ninth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. What was the primary reason James Madison argued that it should be included in the Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution)
Answer: This amendment include rights of the people which have not been mentioned in the previous Constitutional amendments.
Explanation:
The ninth amendment of the united states constitution describes the rights of the people which were not specifically expressed in the Constitution earlier. Certain rights should not be deny or disparage from people. It reveals those rights which protect people from government infringement and some additional fundamental rights were also added to the constitution after this amendment. Thus these rights should be included in the Bill of Rights.
In 1954, the government of bolivia began taking land from francisco loza, a bolivian citizen and resident, for public projects, including an international airport. The government directed the payment of compensation in exchange for at least some of his land, but the government never paid the full amount. In 1993, the bolivian government acknowledged that debt, which was approximately $250 million, but still did not pay. Because mr. Loza had passed away, his heirs, genoveva and marcel loza, who were both u. S. Citizens, filed a suit in a federal district court in the united states against the government of bolivia, seeking damages for the taking. Can the court exercise jurisdiction?.
The United States court cannot exercise jurisdiction over the case because the injury of confiscation did not occur in the United States, and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act exempts the Bolivian government from being sued in the United States.
What is the injury of confiscation?The injury of confiscation or forfeiture refers to the seizure of property without compensation.
Legally, governments may decide to take private property for public purposes, like building an airport.
In this case, the Bolivian government took Loza's property without full payment, it did not refuse to compensate Francisco Loza, and since it has taken steps to pay Loza partly, both Genoveva and Marcel Loza can sue the Bolivian government in Bolivia to make good the balance.
What is the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act?The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act exempts foreign nations from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts unless the Bolivian confiscation of the property occurred in the United States or the case had a commercial impact on the United States.
Thus, the United States court cannot exercise jurisdiction over the case under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act because the Bolivian government did not commit a tort in the United States or violate international law.
Learn more about the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act at https://brainly.com/question/14185506
#SPJ1
QUESTION 4
The concept of "truth-in-sentencing" is closely associated with which perspective
O a. nonintervention.
O b. rehabilitation.
O c.justice.
O d. crime control.
The concept of "truth-in-sentencing" is closely associated with the perspective of a. nonintervention.
What is "truth-in-sentencing"?"Truth-in-sentencing" is a legal requirement that offenders serve a minimum of 85% of their original sentence before they are considered for parole or early release.
The purpose of "truth-in-sentencing" laws is to ensure that criminal convicts serve a substantial portion of their sentences.
"Truth-in-sentencing" also reduces the discrepancy between an imposed prison sentence and the actual time served.
Thus, the concept of "truth-in-sentencing" is closely associated with the perspective of a. nonintervention until a convict has served the minimum time.
Learn more about "truth-in-sentencing" at https://brainly.com/question/4522269
#SPJ1
If you were a candidate for the US House of Representatives this fall, what one issue would be most important to you?
Someone is the part of the US House of Representatives this fall, are the main issues was the jobs and the economy system.
What is House of Representatives?
The Senate and the House of the Representative was the important part of the Congress. The House of the Representative are the cabinet members are the rises of the issues and the remedies of the solving the disputes.
According to the House of the Representative, the member are the mostly rises on the issues are the economy related issues included the employment, healthcare system, and the education system. The candidate for the US House of the Representative are included this kind of the issues.
Hence, the significance of the House of Representatives, aforementioned.
Learn more about on House of Representatives, here:
https://brainly.com/question/747415
#SPJ1
3. Do you think it is important to have a forensic pathologist involved in every death investigation? Why
or why not?
Answer:
Yes, the forensic pathologist's opinions and the autopsy results are vital components of any medicolegal death investigation, they perform autopsies to determine what caused a person's death.
Explanation:
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
Importance of the right to life