After Falwell's organization disbanded, a new organization called the Moral Majority focused less on national campaigns and more on grassroots local politics.
What was the Moral Majority?
Moral Majority, founded in 1979, was an American political organization associated with the Christian right and Republican Party. The political action group that jerry Falwell lead is the Moral Majority.
Which political action group that was led by Falwell?
The Moral Majority which is an American political organization was led by jerry Falwell around 1980s and this group was been referred to a group that was linked with Christian right .
Therefore, Moral Majority is the political action group that jerry Falwell who was a Baptist minister.
learn more about political group at;
brainly.com/question/633543
#SPJ4
How much is the fine for violating any of the restrictions of the gdl permit or probationary license?.
Quasi-contracts
Consider the following in light of the presentation on quasi-contracts: 1) While sitting in my car at a red light, a man walks up to the car and washes my windshield, then demands money for his services. Do I have to pay?
2) Habitat for Humanity REGULARLY sends me stuff--calendars, stationery, etc--in the mail to solicit a contribution. Can I use the stuff without paying for it, or by using it am I committing myself to a contract for a contribution?
1) In the situation described, you are not obligated to pay for the windshield-washing service. This falls under the concept of a quasi-contract, also known as unjust enrichment.
The man provided a service without your request or consent, and therefore, there is no legally binding contract between you. You did not request the service, and he performed it without any prior agreement or understanding. Consequently, you are not obligated to compensate him for his actions.
2) The materials sent to you by Habitat for Humanity, such as calendars and stationery, are typically considered as promotional items or gifts. Using these materials does not create a contractual obligation for you to contribute financially to the organization. It is common for nonprofit organizations to send such items to solicit donations, but the act of using or accepting the materials does not imply a binding agreement or contract to make a contribution. However, if you voluntarily decide to make a donation separately, it would be considered a separate act of goodwill on your part rather than a fulfillment of a contractual obligation.
To read more about Unjust Enrichment click here
https://brainly.com/question/31923888
#SPJ11
a motor vehicle other than a motorcycle being operated during darkness,inclement weather,or both is required to have at least how many lighted headlamps?
A. 3
B. 4
C. 2
D. 6
Each vehicle shall be provided with minimum 2 stop lights. A motor vehicle, often referred to as a motorized vehicle or an automotive vehicle, is a self-propelled land vehicle, typically with wheels, that is used for the movement of people or goods and does not run on rails.
An engine or motor, typically an internal combustion engine or an electric motor, or any mix of the two, such as hybrid electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids, provides the vehicle's propulsion. Motor vehicles are frequently classified for legal purposes into a variety of vehicle classes, such as cars, buses, motorbikes, off-road vehicles, light trucks, and normal trucks.
To learn more about vehicle, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/13390217
#SPJ1
What are the federal law requirements relating to privilege and confidentiality and information disclosed in the NMLS for public access?
The Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS) is an online platform that allows state-licensed mortgage companies, branches, and loan originators to manage their licenses and registrations in one place.
The NMLS collects sensitive information, including personally identifiable information, financial data, and criminal records. Therefore, confidentiality and privilege are essential to maintain the privacy and security of the data.Federal law requirements relating to privilege and confidentiality and information disclosed in the NMLS for public access are set forth in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), which outlines the privacy and security requirements for financial institutions.
The law establishes strict standards for data protection, access, correction, and sharing, and mandates that financial institutions and credit reporting agencies take appropriate measures to safeguard sensitive information.
To know more about GLBA visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31662334
#SPJ11
true/false. growing concentration of economic power katznelson threatens democracy facilitates economic equality makes it easier for citizens to hold corporations accountable for their illegal behavior is the main reason for the increase in racism in the United States
The growing concentration of economic power threatens democracy.
A democracy is a system of governance in which the people have the power to make laws and elect representatives to implement them. Who is called "the people" and how power is distributed or delegated by the people has evolved over time and at different rates in different countries.
Freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of speech, inclusion and equality, citizenship, consent of the governed, the right to vote, not being arbitrarily deprived of the right by the State Life and liberty, and the rights of minorities, are often hallmarks of democracies.
To know more about Democracy here-
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ4
In order for a punishment to be "cruel and unusual" it must be "grossly disproportionate" to the crime committed.
А
True
B False
Answer:
b False
Explanation:
Under the U.S. System of government
the judiciary has the power:
To Create legislation
• To enface laws using police powers
• To interpret the constitutionality of lands
Nominate Justices to the Supreme Court.
Under the U.S. system of government, the judiciary has the power to interpret the constitutionality of laws and nominate Justices to the Supreme Court.
Under the U.S. system of government, the judiciary does not have the power to create legislation. That authority is granted to the legislative branch of government, specifically Congress. The judiciary's primary role is to interpret and apply the law, including the Constitution. They have the power to interpret the constitutionality of laws, which means they can determine whether a law complies with the provisions of the Constitution. This power is known as judicial review. Additionally, the judiciary does not enforce laws using police powers. Law enforcement falls under the executive branch, which includes agencies such as the police and the Department of Justice. However, the judiciary does play a role in interpreting laws and ensuring their enforcement through the adjudication of cases. The President, as part of the executive branch, has the authority to nominate Justices to the Supreme Court, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
For more such question on Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/31448958
#SPJ
According to the Supreme Court in Chimel v. California, involving the search of a house incident to an arrest for burglary of a coin shop:
Answer:
Sorry I don’t understand your cuestión
Explanation:
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
How does an executive order differ from a federal law?.
An executive order differs from a federal law in several ways. An executive order is issued by the President of the United States and is meant to direct and guide the actions of the executive branch of the government. Executive orders are not laws and do not require the approval of Congress.
The president may use an executive order to implement policy changes, to provide guidance to federal agencies, or to take action on a particular issue.Executive orders are more like directives, which aim to set policy or direct action, while laws are formal, written rules that have been passed by Congress and signed by the president. Laws are more powerful than executive orders because they have the force of law behind them. They are also subject to judicial review and can be overturned if they are found to be unconstitutional.Executive orders are also temporary. Once a president leaves office, his or her executive orders are no longer in effect, unless they have been codified into law by Congress.
Federal laws, on the other hand, are permanent, and they can only be changed or repealed by Congress.Executive orders can be challenged in court, but the process is different from the process used to challenge a federal law. While a federal law can be challenged in any court, an executive order can only be challenged in the court that has jurisdiction over the issue in question. Overall, the main differences between an executive order and a federal law are their source of authority, their permanence, and their enforceability.
To know more about executive visit :
https://brainly.com/question/11422252
#SPJ11
How does democracy protect minority rights?
A. by not allowing the passage of unsatisfactory public policies
B. by recognizing that the minority usually represents the popular will
e
C. by permitting the minority to overrule the majority on vital public issues
o
D. by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority
Answer:
D. by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority
Explanation:
Have a great day! :)
The democracy, protect minority rights by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority. Thus option (D) is correct.
What is Democracy?Democracy is a system of government in which laws, policies, leadership, and major undertakings of a state or other polity are directly or indirectly decided by the “people,”
The States with democratic governments prevent rule by autocrats, guarantee fundamental individual rights, allow for a relatively high level of political equality, and rarely make war on each other.
The hallmark of democracy is that it permits citizens to participate in making laws and public policies by regularly choosing their leaders and by voting in assemblies or referendum.
The democracy, protect minority rights by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority. Therefore, option (D) is correct.
Learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/17627950
#SPJ2
how can you tell if something has a balanced or unbalanced force acting on it
Answer:
To determine if the forces acting upon an object are balanced or unbalanced, an analysis must first be conducted to determine what forces are acting upon the object and in what direction. If two individual forces are of equal magnitude and opposite direction, then the forces are said to be balanced.
Explanation:
Stay frosty!
Answer:
If it is balanced, the object stays still. If it is unbalanced, the object is in motion.
Which forensic scientist helped solve the St. Valentine's Day Massacre?
A. Alphonse Bertillon
OB.
Dr. Joseph Bell
Ос.
Calvin Goddard
D.
Francis Galton
O E.
Mathieu Orfila
Answer: Dr. Calvin Goddard
Explanation: Valentine's Day Massacre on February, 14, 1929, one of the nation's foremost forensic scientists, Dr. Calvin Goddard, was hired to examine the ballistic evidence. Goddard compared the bullets collected from the crime scene with test bullets fired by a range of firearms.
Which of the following should a supervisor do to discourage unions?
A. Promise employees that they will receive favorable terms or conditions of employment if they forgo union activity
B. Threaten employees with harsher terms and conditions of employment or employment loss if they engage in union activity
C. Limit direct contact with employees
D. Interrogate employees about pro-union or anti-union sentiments that they or others may have
E. Report any direct or indirect signs of union activity to a core management group
Correct option is option (A) .Promise employees that they will receive favorable terms or conditions of employment if they forgo union activity. This option provides a positive view that discourages union activity, thus creating an atmosphere of mutual respect and trust between employees and management.
To avoid union activities, it's important for management to create an environment that recognizes and respects employees' needs and interests, and to listen to employees' opinions. As a result, any issues or problems that arise can be addressed in a way that benefits both the company and its employees.To avoid union activities, the following tips can be considered by management:
Create a positive environment: To avoid union activities, create an environment where employees feel valued and respected, with open communication, feedback, and support provided. Employee satisfaction should be the main focus of the organization. Positive incentives should be given to employees who work hard and are loyal to the company.Provide better working conditions: Management should provide better working conditions to employees, such as better pay and better benefits. This will show employees that they are valued, and as a result, union activities will be less likely to occur.
Communicate effectively: Communication is critical in maintaining a healthy relationship between management and employees. Management should communicate with employees regularly, clearly, and honestly about the company's plans and goals. This will help employees feel more connected to the company and less likely to join a union.
To know more about Employee Union visit-
brainly.com/question/25906246
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT a type of crime pattern analysis? *
Crime and incident series identification
General profile analysis
Victim identification
Hot spot identification
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
In the case of Furman vs Georgia,the Supreme Court ruled the application of the death penalty as existed then was unconstitutional. T/F
Describe and explain the difference between politically based and religiously based terrorism; which is more dangerous and why.
Terrorism is defined by political terrorism as "premeditated, politically motivated violence." Religiously motivated terrorism results from human moral standards being heavily influenced by religion belief and practise.
What connection exists between religious fundamentalism and terrorism?Terrorism, which seeks to advance its ideological goal via bloodshed, assassinations, and the instillation of fear in society through a variety of methods of religious fundamentalism.
Which is more risky, and why?Terrorism is influenced by a number of factors, including societal inequality, state economic performance, war and violent conflict, state corruption, and political instability. While pressure can be administered with violence as well as other methods in a religious context, the violent act is sanctified and approved of by the religious organisation.So, it is challenging to compare them based on how harmful they are, but it is obvious that neither is beneficial for an economy.
To know more about Religiously based terrorism; visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2681683
#SPJ1
In a closed primary, who selects a political party's nominees for office?
all qualified voters
only party members
only party leaders
delegates
When candidates are elected through a closed primary, it means that those that voted for them are only party members.
A closed primary:
Allows only party members to vote Ensure that party ideology is followed when nominating a candidateIn a closed primary, the only people who can vote are those who are actually registered to the party. Independent voters are not allowed but may register for the party on election day.
In conclusion, only party members can vote in a closed primary.
Find out more primaries at https://brainly.com/question/16130672.
Answer:
b. only party members
Explanation:
edge
Which of the following is NOT potentially a penalty for violation of a law or regulation prohibiting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA)?
Deportation
promotes efficienc
Fraud
All of the above
The answer is "promotes efficiency" because it is not a penalty for violation of a law or regulation prohibiting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA). Penalties for FWA violations can include fines, imprisonment, and exclusion from participation in government programs, among others.
It is important for individuals and organizations to comply with these laws and regulations to prevent harm to individuals and the economy. The penalties serve as a deterrent to discourage FWA and promote accountability for those who engage in such activities. It is crucial to be aware of the laws and regulations prohibiting FWA and take steps to prevent violations. Organizations can implement compliance programs, conduct regular training, and establish reporting mechanisms to identify and address potential FWA violations. By preventing FWA, organizations can promote integrity, trust, and fairness in their operations.
To know more about FWA violations
https://brainly.com/question/25780871
#SPJ11
'Promotes efficiency' is not a potential penalty for Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA) violations, unlike 'Deportation' and 'Fraud', which can be potential penalties.
Explanation:The option that is NOT potentially a penalty for the violation of a law or regulation prohibiting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA) is 'promotes efficiency'.
The prompts like 'Deportation' and 'Fraud' can be potential penalties for FWA. Deportation might be in extreme cases where the convicted individual is a non-citizen. Fraud can be both a violation and a penalty in the forms of criminal charges, legal fees, etc.
However, 'promotes efficiency' is an organizational goal or a positive outcome, not a penalty. Ensuring compliance with laws and regulations will help promote efficiency, but it itself is not a consequence for violating them. This does not fit the context of penalties for FWA violations.
Learn more about FWA penalties here:https://brainly.com/question/34693008
#SPJ6
Identify the reasons why the new drug application provision under the 1938 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act was important?
The new drug application (NDA) provision under the 1938 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act was important for several reasons. The NDA provision was an important step towards ensuring the safety and effectiveness of new drugs and protecting the public's health.
Firstly, it required pharmaceutical companies to provide scientific evidence of a new drug's safety and efficacy before it could be marketed to the public.
This helped to protect consumers from potentially harmful or ineffective drugs. Secondly, the NDA process allowed the FDA to review and approve new drugs, ensuring that they met high standards for quality, purity, and strength. This helped to build public trust in the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory process.
Lastly, the NDA provision also allowed the FDA to require post-marketing studies and monitoring of approved drugs, helping to identify and address any safety concerns that may arise after a drug has been on the market for some time.
To know more about new drug application visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1640938
#SPJ11
Imagine you are a state judge running for reelection and are challenged by a popular lawyer in town, who is known as a champion for the poor. The latest poll indicated that you were five percentage points behind your opponent. A local labor union with 20,000 due-paying members comes to you to offer not only large donations, but also actual union member votes, which would assure your victory. You know that the same union has filed a lawsuit in your court requesting that the current state law governing the amount of political contributions by labor unions be lifted.
Would you accept their support?
If yes, how would you justify your decision ethically?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
This is not a bribe as they are not asking for you to vote in their favor. You can take it without feeling guilty as they know that this could be highly illegal if they try and sway you over.
1. The Articles of Confederation was adopted by Congress in ______ but not ratified until _____.
Answer:
The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781
Explanation:
Ford, GM, and Stellantis produce electric vehicles. Provide an explanation for whether each of the following activities would be legal or illegal based on US antitrust law. (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree not to lower prices for the rest of 2022. (b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis have electric vehicle factories in different US states, but they sell their vehicles in every US state. (c) Due to higher input prices (i.e. labor costs and computer chips). Ford, GM, and Stellantis each increased the price of new electric vehicles this year. (d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US. Ford will take the Eastern region, GM will take the Midwest region, and Stellantis will take the Western region.
(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.
(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices for the rest of 2022 would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement would be classified as price fixing, which is an anticompetitive practice. Price fixing involves competitors colluding to set prices at a certain level, eliminating competition and harming consumers. Such agreements are typically prohibited under US antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. Price fixing reduces consumer choice, suppresses competition, and can result in higher prices for consumers.
(b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis having electric vehicle factories in different US states but selling their vehicles in every US state would generally be legal under US antitrust law. This situation does not involve any explicit anticompetitive practices such as price fixing or market allocation. As long as each company competes independently in the marketplace and does not engage in collusion or other forms of anticompetitive behavior, their ability to sell vehicles across state lines is generally permissible.
(c) Ford, GM, and Stellantis increasing the price of new electric vehicles due to higher input prices, such as labor costs and computer chips, would likely be legal under US antitrust law. Pricing decisions based on legitimate factors such as increased production costs are generally within the purview of individual companies. As long as these companies do not coordinate their pricing decisions through collusion or anticompetitive agreements, they have the discretion to set prices according to their own cost structures and market conditions.
(d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US, with each company taking control of a specific region, would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement is known as market allocation, where competitors divide markets among themselves, eliminating competition in certain areas. Market allocation agreements are generally considered anticompetitive and are prohibited under US antitrust laws. These agreements harm competition, restrict consumer choice, and can lead to higher prices. In the given scenario, if Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into specific regions, it would restrict competition and violate antitrust laws.
In summary, (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.
Learn more about illegal
https://brainly.com/question/27375182
#SPJ11
When directors on a board serve for a fixed term but are not elected all at once it is known as a(n) ______ board. a. cumulative b. staggered c. proxy
Answer:
B- staggered
Explanation:
What is a warranty?
(A) It is a stipulation about the contract.
(B) It is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract
(C) It is a stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract.
(D) It is a statement of commendation by the seller.
Answer:
C) because when you give a warranty its collateral if the product is lost, breaks, and ect that why you pay a little extra money
The 0.9 percent additional Medicare tax applies to ______.A) self-employed individuals when wages and self-employment income combined exceed a threshold amountB) self-employed individuals only when such individuals also earn income as an employeeC) employees, but does not apply to self-employed individuals
The 0.9 percent additional Medicare tax applies to option A: self-employed individuals when wages and self-employment income combined exceed a threshold amount.
Only individuals who earn greater wages are subject to the 0.9% additional Medicare amount. In addition to the regular Medicare tax, it is paid. For a total of 2.35% of their salary, an employee will pay the 1.45% basic Medicare tax as well as the 0.9% supplemental Medicare tax.
When salaries and self-employment income surpass a threshold amount, it is solely applied to self-employed people. Employers are not required to make any contributions through the extra Medicare tax. When a person's total income exceeds the cutoff for their filing status, they become subject to the extra Medicare tax.
To know more about medicare taxes, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29760938
#SPJ4
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional questions.
Online Content: Site 1
What is perspective and point of view? (Site 1)
What are two different perspectives of the American Revolution? (Site 1)
What can identifying perspective and point of view help you to do? (Site 1)
Explain the "Don'ts" when interviewing the victim of a sexual offense. Explain why you don't do those things during the interview. Essay must be 7 to 10 sentences.
Answer:
In sex crimes, the victim interview is usually your main evidence and your main source of evidence leads, more so than with any other crime. At the same time, the sex crime victim's telling of their stories is usually much more inhibited, guarded, and vulnerable to distortion than for victims of other crimes. Complicating the picture even more, no other crime victim interview tends to make the interviewer feel more uncertain about how best to proceed.DON'T - start your interview without again dedicating three or four minutes solely to addressing the victim's needs and concerns.
Sex crimes victims almost always arrive at the interview plagued with shame, anxieties, misinformation, and with fears of being judged. Even more significant, they usually come to these interviews still very uncertain about whether or not they really want to be going forward with the justice process.
This state of mind is in stark contrast, for example, to a robbery victim who is completely unconflicted about their outrage and can't wait to get the story on the record. As long as these anxieties and uncertainties of sex crimes victims remain unaddressed, chances are they're going to be very hesitant and holding back.
Explanation:
Explain the Rule of Law and explain its development on the American legal, political, and governmental system.
Answer:
The idea that those who govern must follow the laws; no one is above the law.
Explanation:
The Rule of Law has a huge impact on our government officials and institutions, from how they are held accountable (responsible) to how decisions are made to how laws are enforced! The Rule of Law protects us from tyranny (corrupt government) and is the foundation of liberty!