A group that is focused on civil rights and government services for minorities or ethnic groups would be considered a noneconomic organization.
An action that is carried out with the goal of helping others without considering financial benefit is referred to as non-economic activity. Activities that are started for leisure or to meet human needs are referred to as non-economic activities.
Some typical examples of non-economic pursuits include the following:
Activities for leisure time: They try to provide enjoyment when there is none. For instance, singing, drawing, etc.Family-focused activities: These endeavors are devoted to and motivated by the institution of the family. A doctor consulting a patient who is a member of his family, for instance, or a teacher providing education to their own child at home.The concepts of happiness and mental contentment are included in cultural and religious activities. For instance, praising God, going to the temple, etc.Social welfare activities: They are driven by a desire to help or have empathy for others in the community. They consist of giving to the less fortunate, taking part in camps to aid those affected by war, natural disasters, etc.To learn more about noneconomic please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14407378
#SPJ4
?????? anyone know this?
In your own words, explain what are the Miranda rights?
What are two reasons the Supreme Court focuses on private conferences
Most of the seats in congress, according to election results, are classified as being
Most of the seats in Congress, according to election results, are classified as being "more than 50".The United States Congress is the legislative branch of the federal government of the United States.
Congress consists of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate has 100 members, two from each state, while the House of Representatives has 435 members, with the number from each state based on population.
In the House, each member represents a congressional district and is elected for a two-year term.In the United States, the party with the most representatives in the House is said to be the "majority party," while the other party is the "minority party." Currently, the Democrats hold a majority in the House of Representatives, with over 50% of the seats.
To know more about election visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ11
How does the TSA enforce security regulations on
airports? Are there any limits to this enforcement and what are the
penalties for non-compliance?
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security regulations at airports in the United States through a combination of measures aimed at protecting passengers, baggage, and aircraft.
The TSA's enforcement of security regulations primarily involves the following aspects:
Screening Procedures: The TSA conducts passenger and baggage screening using various technologies such as X-ray scanners, metal detectors, and explosive detection systems. These procedures help identify prohibited items and potential security threats.
Security Checkpoints: TSA officers stationed at security checkpoints ensure compliance with security protocols by conducting thorough inspections of passengers and their belongings. This includes checking identification, verifying boarding passes, and screening individuals for prohibited items.
Security Equipment and Training: The TSA deploys advanced security equipment and provides specialized training to its officers to enhance their ability to detect and respond to security threats effectively. This includes training in threat recognition, behavior detection, and response protocols.
Security Measures: The TSA implements additional security measures, such as random passenger screening, enhanced pat-downs, and canine teams, to deter and detect potential threats.
While the TSA has broad authority to enforce security regulations, there are certain limits to its enforcement powers. The agency must operate within the confines of applicable laws, regulations, and constitutional protections, including respecting passengers' rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.In terms of penalties for non-compliance with TSA security regulations, they can vary depending on the specific violation. The TSA has the authority to issue civil penalties, which can range from fines to legal actions. For example, individuals who attempt to bring prohibited items through security checkpoints may face fines, denied boarding, or even criminal charges in severe cases. Additionally, the TSA may implement measures such as increased screening or additional security procedures for non-compliant individuals or airports.It's important to note that compliance with TSA security regulations is a critical aspect of maintaining aviation security and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. Airlines, airport operators, and individuals are expected to cooperate with the TSA's security measures to maintain a secure and efficient air travel environment.
To know more about civil penalties, click here https://brainly.com/question/32396562
#SPJ11
Abigail was asked to leave the Proctor's home because Elizabeth suspects that Abigail and Proctor have had an affair. Abigail's feelings towards John Proctor are of love, while w/ Elizabeth Proctor, she despises her.
The situation you have described appears to be a character relationship from Arthur Miller's play, "The Crucible."
Abigail Williams, the protagonist of the play, has been dismissed from the Proctor's home after Elizabeth Proctor, John Proctor's wife, suspects that Abigail and John have had an affair. Abigail's feelings towards John Proctor are indeed those of love and desire, as she had an affair with him in the past and still harbors strong feelings for him. However, Abigail's feelings towards Elizabeth Proctor are those of resentment and hostility, as she views Elizabeth as an obstacle to her relationship with John. This complex relationship dynamic is a significant theme in the play, as it contributes to the tension and conflict that drives the plot forward.
To know more about The Crucible click here:
brainly.com/question/27770781
#SPJ4
On Tuesday Aria tells Bu, a workmate, that she is: ‘thinking of selling her car which is worth about £2,000’. On Wednesday morning Bu emails Aria: ‘Will take the car for £2,000, will pay U when I see U’. Aria replies by email on Wednesday evening: ‘Don’t be silly, I was not actually offering to sell the car but, having thought about it, you can have it for £2,500. I know you will want it so don’t bother writing back unless you are not interested.’ Bu is so annoyed when he reads the first sentence of Aria’s email that he immediately deletes it. On Saturday Aria drives round to Bu’s house to deliver the car and demands payment. Discuss.
Would your answer differ if, after reading all of the email Aria sent on Wednesday evening, Bu decided he wanted to buy the car for £2,500 and Aria now refuses to deliver it?
There is no valid agreement between Bu and Aria in the situation given above, as there was no common acceptance for the purpose of buying and selling the car at the desired price.
What is the significance of a valid agreement?A valid agreement can be referred to or considered as an agreement that holds the conditions of offer being accepted by the parties involved, and eventually leads to the formation of a legal contract between both the parties involved in the contract for one single offer.
Therefore, the significance regarding a valid agreement has been aforementioned.
Learn more about a valid agreement here:
https://brainly.com/question/28080427
#SPJ1
how is federalism seen throughtout the judical branch?
Answer:
interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed
Explanation:
The judiciary is such a body that interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed. Besides, in federal states, disputes between the Centre and States are common and natural. The judiciary also resolves the disputes between the Centre and States as well as between the States.
Lincoln has been taking advantage of benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, benson seeks relief and legal freedom from his contract
If a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the b) Contract is voided.
What is an unfair contract?An unfair contract is one that adversely affects the rights of one of the contracting parties.
Such an unfair contract is void.
By definition, a void contract is effectively illegitimate and unenforceable ab nitio.
Answer Options:a) Contract will be modified
b) Contract is voided
c) Contract is voided, subject to investigation
d) Contract is valid
Thus, if a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the b) Contract is voided.
Learn more about void contracts at https://brainly.com/question/7306383
#SPJ1
In the “Little Albert” experiment, psychologist John Watson conditioned a(n) ____________.
A.
lab rat to fear an infant
B.
infant to fear Santa Claus
C.
infant to fear a lab rat
D.
lab rat to fear loud noises
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Infant to fear a lab rat
Explanation:
The Little Albert Experiment expressed that traditional conditioning the relationship of a particular incentive or behavior with an irrelevant incentive or behavior works in human beings. In the research, psychologist John Watson was able to condition an earlier unafraid baby to become afraid of a rat.
Please give Brainliest :)
Discus in detail why you think it is important or necessary to study the source of law of a given society.
Answer:
Often, the careful examination of where the roots of a given society's laws lie, can provide comprehensive insight in the core beliefs of the society as well as information on how they perceive the world. For instance, a law that dictates harsh punishments for petty crimes can lead the inference that that society values law and order and strives for perfection. Laws based on religious teachings can tell us that the society is religious and is not secular. Simple examinations on laws such as these can provide much insight on the character of the society. Often, law is the reflection of those who created it.
what is the command to take away the read and execute permissions for the others for the lisa folder, within the home directory using symbolic permissions?
The command to take away the read and execute permissions for the others for the lisa folder, within the home directory using symbolic permissions is "chmod o-rx ~/lisa".
The "chmod" command is used to change the permissions of a file or directory. The "o" stands for "others" which means any user that is not the owner or part of the group that the file or directory belongs to. The "-r" stands for "read" and the "-x" stands for "execute" permissions. By adding the "-r" and "-x" options, we are removing the read and execute permissions for others. The "~/" symbol refers to the home directory and "lisa" is the name of the folder we want to modify.
Overall, the command "chmod o-rx ~/lisa" will take away the read and execute permissions for others for the lisa folder within the home directory using symbolic permissions.
To know more about symbolic permissions visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29270103
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not sufficient grounds for revoking a medical license?conviction of a felonyfalsifying medical recordsmisdiagnosispersonal incapacityunprofessional conduct
Misdiagnosis is not sufficient grounds for revoking a medical license.
What is license?A license is a legal agreement that grants permission to use a specific product, service, or intellectual property. It is essentially a contract between a licensor and a licensee, where the licensor grants the licensee a set of rights to use their intellectual property in exchange for a fee or other form of compensation. A license can be for a one-time fee or a recurring fee, depending on the type of product or service being licensed. The license agreement also outlines the terms and conditions of the use of the intellectual property, including any restrictions or limitations.
To learn more about license
https://brainly.com/question/30028899
#SPJ4
A light spring obeys Hooke's Law. It takes 31.9 J of work to stretch this spring from an elongation of 4.36 cm to an elongation of 5.36 cm (a) Is the amount of work required to increase the elongation of the spring from 5.36 cm to 6.36 cm greater than, less than, or equal to 31.9J? greater than less than equal to (b) Verify your answer to part (a) by calculating the required work (in )
(a) The amount of work required to increase the elongation of the spring from 5.36 cm to 6.36 cm is greater than 31.9 J according to Hooke's Law.
(b) To verify this, we can use Hooke's Law:
F = -kx
where F is the force exerted by the spring, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement from the equilibrium position.
We can find the spring constant by using the given information:
W = (1/2)kx^2
where W is the work done on the spring and x is the displacement.
Plugging in the given values, we get:
31.9 J = (1/2)k(0.01 m)^2
Solving for k, we get:
k = 25560 N/m
Now we can calculate the force required to stretch the spring from 5.36 cm to 6.36 cm:
F = -kx
F = -(25560 N/m)(0.01 m)
F = -255.6 N
The work required is:
W = (1/2)kx^2
W = (1/2)(25560 N/m)(0.01 m)^2
W = 1.278 J
Therefore, the amount of work required to increase the elongation of the spring from 5.36 cm to 6.36 cm is greater than 31.9 J.
For more such questions on Hooke's Law, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/17068281
#SPJ11
career criminal prosecution program in san diego was characterized
The career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized by a high conviction rate and mandatory sentencing.
How the career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized The career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized by a high conviction rate and mandatory sentencing. This program aimed to put career criminals behind bars for as long as possible. San Diego was considered a pioneer in this approach to prosecution during the 1980s and 1990s, according to criminal justice researchers. The program was seen as a more aggressive approach to fighting crime, especially by repeat offenders. It resulted in fewer trials and more plea bargains due to the threat of mandatory sentencing. This approach aimed to deter criminal behavior by imposing lengthy prison terms.
Learn more about prosecution
https://brainly.com/question/29807782
#SPJ11
When making ethical decisions on behalf of your employer, should you consider the impact on others outside your employer? If so, who and why?
Please help me
In a situation in which I have to make ethical decisions on behalf of my employer, I should consider the impact of the people who are involved because my ethical behavior would be involved despite being on behalf of my employer.
Ethics is a term to refer to a subdiscipline of philosophy that focuses on the study of human behavior, its relationship with:
The notions of right and wrongThe moral preceptsDutyThe happinessThe common welfareAccording to the above, in a situation in which I must make an ethical decision on behalf of my boss, I must consider the impact that it will have on other people because my ethical actions will influence my decision. For example:
If my boss tells me that I should fire a co-worker because the company has lowered its profits, surely he considers that this is an ethical act for his benefit and his interests.However, I know that my partner depends on the salary he earns in the company and that he and his family would be affected by this decision. Then I could not fire him because he would be doing him a bad thing.Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/2630782
Drivers must understand that the traffic laws
Answer:
yeah they must understand the traffic laws.
hope it helps
stay safe healthy and happy..
Explanation:
Drivers must understand that traffic laws help them and should be supported and followed.
1. the theories and perspectives in this unit focus on the environmental and social
influence of crime. do you think that environmental and social conditions influence
crime? why or why not? between biological, psychological, and social factors,
which one do you think plays the biggest role in crime? why?--
Environmental and social factors do have an impact on crime. However, the factors that have the greatest influence are psychological.
What is crime?A crime is a term to refer to a voluntary wrongful or reprehensible action that according to the law must be reprimanded and prohibited.
When a person commits a crime many factors influence him to carry out this act, some of this influence is:
Environmental: It is the environmental factor that influences a person to commit a crime, generally refers to the influence of an environment on the behavior of a person to commit a crime.Social: This factor refers to the influence of social dynamics such as: stratification, segregation, discrimination, among others, that influence the behavior of one or more individuals to commit a crime.Psychological: This factor refers to the interpretation of reality and the autonomous thoughts of the individual to commit a crime.According to the above, it can be inferred that of the factors that influence a crime, the most important is the psychological factor because it has a greater impact on the individual's thinking.
Learn more about crime in: https://brainly.com/question/15691073
In the event that a man died without a son, a _____, a brother or next of kin, redeemed the dead man's property and married his widow.
relative
friend
redeemer
In the event that a man died without a son, a redeemer, a brother or next of kin, redeemed the dead man's property and married his widow. A Christian notion is a kinsman redeemer.
A male relative known as a "kinsman-redeemer" has the obligation to offer assistance to another male family member who is in peril or otherwise in need. Ruth, a biblical figure who lost her husband and was made to work for crumbs, At this point, a kinsman redeemer's function entered the scene. In the ancient world, it was difficult for women to find work that would support them. After seeing her state of helplessness, Boaz decides that it is his responsibility as the kinsman-redeemer to care for her and makes a marriage proposal. Such a kinsman redeemer also has the duty to exact revenge if the kin has been killed. It goes much beyond that.
To know more about Christianity:
brainly.com/question/3749222
#SPJ4
What are the requirements for an individual to claim damages under the workers' compensation laws? (Check all that apply.)
The employer and employee are covered under the state workers' compensation system.
He or she must be an employee.
The injury occurred on the job.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
All of the options are correct. The requirements for an individual to claim damages under the workers' compensation laws are:
The employer and employee are covered under the state workers' compensation system.
He or she must be an employee.
The injury occurred on the job.
When the opposing party is to bring documents to a deposition she or he should be served with a: ________
When the opposing party is to bring documents to a deposition, he or she should be served with a subpoena duces tecum.
A subpoena duces tecum is a legal order requiring the recipient to appear and bring certain specified documents or pieces of evidence to a court hearing or deposition. In other words, it is a type of subpoena that requires the recipient to provide certain documents, materials, or objects in their possession or control at a deposition.A subpoena duces tecum is a useful legal tool to obtain evidence for use in legal proceedings. If a party refuses to comply with a subpoena duces tecum, he or she may face legal sanctions such as fines or contempt of court charges.
To know more about evidence , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/375033
#SPJ11
differentiate between good faith and commercial reasonableness. discuss the need for such terms in law.
Good faith refers to sincere and honest intention, while commercial reasonableness relates to industry standards and practices, both ensuring fairness and predictability in legal relationships and business transactions.
What is the distinction between good faith and commercial reasonableness, and why are these terms necessary in law?Good faith and commercial reasonableness are two distinct concepts in law, often used in different contexts.
It implies the absence of fraudulent or deceitful intent. When parties are required to act in good faith, it means they must honestly and reasonably fulfill their obligations, adhere to the terms of agreements, and deal fairly with each other.
Good faith is a fundamental principle in contract law and is expected to govern the conduct of parties in various legal relationships.
It involves evaluating whether a decision, action, or transaction is consistent with the general practices and standards of the relevant industry or market.
The determination of commercial reasonableness takes into account factors such as prevailing market conditions, industry norms, standard business practices, and the expectations of reasonable businesspersons.
The need for such terms in law arises from the desire to ensure fairness, equity, and predictability in business transactions and legal relationships.
It encourages parties to act honestly, disclose relevant information, and fulfill their obligations in a responsible manner.
Commercial reasonableness, on the other hand, promotes commercial efficiency and stability by providing a standard against which business practices and decisions can be evaluated.
It allows for consistency and predictability in commercial transactions, ensuring that parties act in a manner that is reasonable and customary within their industry or market.
By incorporating these concepts into legal frameworks, courts and parties are able to establish standards of conduct and evaluate the behavior of parties involved in business transactions.
Learn more about commercial reasonableness
brainly.com/question/4437847
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an example of a private community service
solution to a local problem?
A. A town raises its sales tax to pay for a new fire engine.
B. A community increases its property taxes to build a homeless shelter.
C. Retired teachers volunteer to help students in an after-school program.
D. A local hospital increases its fees for some treatments in order to stay in
business.
Answer:
the answer is C ..retired teachers volunteer to help students in an after school program.
Drug Users will have ____ psychological changes
A. Mild
B. Significant
C.no
Answer:
significant
Explanation:
Answer:
Drug users will have Significant psychological changes
Explanation:
The reason for this is that certain drugs can harm the brain devouring important elements of control
Can a prisoner sue me
What is the key difference between the constitutional courts and the special courts?.
The main distinction between the constitutional courts and the special courts is that the former only hear cases in a very limited range of circumstances, and their judges are appointed for a set period of time, whereas the latter's primary function is to determine whether challenged laws are, in fact, unconstitutional.
When it comes to interpreting, defending, and upholding the Constitution, the Constitutional Court is referred to as the highest court in the nation. The constitutional courts only deal with constitutional issues, such as situations that raise concerns about how the Constitution should be applied or interpreted.
A special court is a sort of court that is founded outside of the regular judicial system, has judges that are recruited irregularly, and uses an irregular process for making decisions.
In conclusion, the main distinction between the constitutional courts and the special courts is that the former only have a very limited range of jurisdiction and their judges are appointed for a set term, whereas the latter have the primary responsibility for determining whether contested laws are, in fact, unconstitutional.
To know more about Constitutional court and Special court go to https://brainly.com/question/4457052
#SPJ4
The President has just negotiated the terms of a treaty with the leader of Argentina and has left that country to return to the United States to
inform Congress of his actions. Argentinian newspapers celebrate the event with headlines such as "Treaty with U.S.is Ratified!" Which of the
following statements about this headline is CORRECT?
O A The headline is accurate because the power to make treaties is one of the President's powers as chief diplomat.
B. The headline is inaccurate, because the President cannot ratify a treaty until the Senate has given its consent.
C. The headline is accurate because the Senate must ratify a treaty before the President can begin negotiations.
o
D. The headline is inaccurate because the President can negotiate a treaty, but it must be ratified by the full Senate
According to the English bill of rights, who makes laws regarding taxation?
Dirty headlight lenses are safe and do not cut the amount of light your headlight emit by as much as 90
Answer:
What type of headlight lens can cut the amount of light it emits by 90 percent? Low beam Keep headlights clean Dirt on the lenses can reduce the light by percent?
Explanation:
The plastic lenses that commonly cover headlight bulbs become cloudy and hazy over time, reducing the amount of light illuminating the road.
Which situational condition decreases the chances of crimes?
O A.
ethnic heterogeneity
O B. Relative deprivation
O C. Ineffective schools
O D. Installation of security camera
Answer:
D: Installation of security cameras
Explanation: