Answers
Answer:
Descartes argues that the senses are a thing of the body, not of the mind. The mind tells you it is wax while the body tells you it is cold, hard, scented, and so forth. Descartes argues that this is because the senses do not belong to the object.
The epistemological positions held by Descartes and Hume are contrasting as Descartes utilizes skepticism or doubt to find truth and knowledge present in the various sciences whereas, Hume uses skepticism and doubt to explain how knowledge is obtained or acquired.
Please give me brainliest - you get 25% as well! I swear!
Related Questions
An LLP can only be created by a professional company - such as a law firm. True False
Answers
False. While a limited liability partnership (LLP) is often associated with professional companies such as law firms, it is not limited to them.
A partnership in which some or all members have restricted obligations is known as a limited liability partnership. An LLP is a legal business structure that provides limited liability protection to its owners (partners) similar to a corporation, while also allowing flexibility in terms of management and taxation. LLPs can be formed by professionals in various fields, including accountants, architects, doctors, engineers, and more. So, an LLP can be created by a professional company, but it is not limited to that specific type of business.
To know more about limited liability partnership (LLP)
https://brainly.com/question/32138772
#SPJ11
What does the phrase "running with the land" mean in connection with easements and private restrictions? Suppose that after you buy some property, the next-door neighbor tells you that there’s a private restriction that prevents removal of certain trees on your property. Your deed doesn't say anything about this restriction, but the neighbor says it was imposed in a document that was recorded in 1932.
Do you have to comply with the restriction, or can you cut down the trees if you want to?
Answers
The phrase "running with the land" means that any easements or private restrictions associated with a piece of property are passed on to subsequent owners of the property.
In the given scenario, the private restriction preventing the removal of certain trees on the property would still be applicable even if it is not mentioned in the current deed.
When a private restriction or easement is "running with the land", it means that it is attached to the property itself rather than to any particular owner. This means that subsequent owners of the property are also bound by the restrictions or easements. In the given scenario, the private restriction preventing the removal of certain trees would still be applicable even if it is not mentioned in the current deed.
As such, the property owner would be required to comply with the restriction and would not be able to cut down the trees unless the restriction is lifted or modified. It is important for property owners to thoroughly research any possible easements or restrictions associated with a property they are considering purchasing to avoid any surprises later on.
To learn more about easement click brainly.com/question/22400838
#SPJ11
Consider and explain what this type of research might mean for the future?
Answers
Answer:
It will help develop the lives of citizens
Juvenile delinquency data suggests which of the following with respect to the impact of a “broken home” (divorce, separation, death) on juvenile delinquency rates:
Answers
Answer:
Juvenile delinquency data suggests that most troubled kids either where raised by a grandmother, aunt or other family members tend to act out on the account that they don't have a stable punishment system or they are mentally unstable. Often times troubled kids also do not do well in school, or on the contrary they are extremely intelligent.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE YOU 70 points PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE PLEASE
Answers
Constitution of United States of America 1789
Explanation:
You posted a photo of the 1st amendment, but didn't ask what you were looking for so I am just assuming this is what you need
which of the following terms is used for shared ideas about desirable goals in a culture, such as good health, success, and loyalty? 1. values 2. wants 3. folkways 4. norms
Answers
The term used for shared ideas about desirable goals in a culture, such as good health, success, and loyalty, is "values." Values are beliefs and principles that guide behavior and are considered important by a society.
They represent the ideals and aspirations of a culture and influence individual and collective actions. The term used for shared ideas about desirable goals in a culture, such as good health, success, and loyalty, is "values." Values are the beliefs and principles that guide the behavior and choices of individuals and communities within a society.
They represent the fundamental concepts that people hold dear and are essential in shaping the norms, customs, and behaviors of a culture. Values refer to the beliefs and principles that are considered important and desirable in a particular culture.
They serve as a guide for individuals and societies in determining what is right, important, and worthy of pursuit. Values can vary between cultures and influence behavior, decision-making, and social norms within a society.
To know more about Values visit.
https://brainly.com/question/30145972
#SPJ11
Which of the following is considered a social effect of a crime?
O Strained relationship with loves ones
Changes in sleeping and eating habits
Attempting to shut out the pain
Medical loss due to injury
Answers
Answer:
Stained relationship with love ones.
What is the fifth amendment?
Answers
Answer:
The Fifth Amendment secures the right to a grand jury in criminal trials, prohibits “double jeopardy,” and provides protection against self-incrimination.
Explanation:
People who become members of interest groups for solidary incentives are joining
a) for a sense of belonging to the group.
b) to improve their economic opportunities.
c) for ethical beliefs or ideological reasons.
d) to obtain political, economic, or social change.
e) as free riders.
Answers
People who become members of interest groups for solidary incentives are joining: a) for a sense of belonging to the group.
Solidary incentives: elusive prizes from the act of affiliation - amiability, status, recognizable proof. Purposive incentives: elusive prizes connected with the objectives of the association - - - e.g., dealing with an appointment of an upheld candidate.
Selective material benefits will be benefits that are normally given in money related benefits.
Many exchange and expert interest groups will generally give these sorts of benefits to their individuals.
A selective solidary benefit is one more sort of advantage proposed to individuals or imminent individuals from an interest bunch.
A solidary motivation is one in which the compensations for support are socially determined and made out of the act of affiliation.
Recognize the benefits and incentives for people to join interest groups
to know more about benefits and incentives click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29889322
#SPJ4
______ damages are an attempt to put the nonbreaching party in the same position she would have been in if the other party had performed as agreed.
Answers
The damages are called "Compensatory damages" that are an attempt to put the non breaching party in the same position she would have been in if the other party had performed as agreed.
What are Compensatory damages?Compensatory damages are the damages awarded by a court to place the claimant in the same position that they would have been in if the breach of contract had never occurred. The goal of these damages is to "compensate" the victim for any damages caused by the breach, such as lost wages, medical expenses, and other economic losses.
Compensatory damages are commonly used in contract law cases, although they may also be awarded in other types of cases, such as personal injury claims. There are two types of compensatory damages, which are "actual damages" and "consequential damages". Actual damages refer to the direct losses that were caused by the breach of contract, such as lost wages or the cost of replacing a damaged item.
Consequential damages refer to indirect losses that were caused by the breach, such as lost profits due to a delay in delivery of goods or services.
To know more about Compensatory damages visit
https://brainly.com/question/32462808
#SPJ11
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was developed by the U.S. to assess the effects a significant federal action will have on the environment, and seek to mitigate this impact. This concept has been adopted by many developed and some developing nations. Which of the following is NOT a major aspect of an EIA?
Group of answer choices
To predict and evaluate environmental effects.
To avoid or mitigate negative impacts.
To examine alternative approaches that may be environmentally preferrable.
To collect data to deny the project form moving forward.
Answers
The following is NOT a major aspect of an EIA: option (D) correct To collect data to deny the project from moving forward. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is the method for determining how the environment may be influenced by a proposed activity or project.
EIA is used to forecast environmental effects at an early stage in project planning and design, and to identify ways to minimize adverse effects and improve positive effects. The four major aspects of an EIA are: To predict and evaluate environmental effects.
To avoid or mitigate negative impacts. To examine alternative approaches that may be environmentally preferable. To collect data to help make a decision.
To know more about Environmental Impact Assessment visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16326960
#SPJ11
Many courts require mediation or arbitratrion before a case goes
to trial.
True
False
Answers
The statement "Many courts require mediation or arbitration before a case goes to trial" is true because it is becoming a common practice in many courts to mandate mediation or arbitration to be conducted before a case goes to trial.
The aim of this process is to help reduce the caseload on the courts, thereby saving them time and resources. In some instances, a judge may order parties to participate in mediation or arbitration, or they may be referred to a mediator or arbitrator by the court. In many jurisdictions, mediation or arbitration is compulsory before a lawsuit goes to trial.
This is because it helps to keep the courts less burdened and resolves disputes more quickly. Some courts have even set up court-mandated mediation programs to support parties in settling their disputes in an informal and non-threatening environment.
Arbitration, on the other hand, is more formal and follows the rules of the court. It is a cost-effective way of resolving disputes and usually results in a binding decision by the arbitrator.
Learn more about courts https://brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ11
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answers
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
The government __________ is the difference produced when spending exceeds revenues in a fiscal year while the government __________ is the total amount of money borrowed over the years that is not yet repaid.
Group of answer choices
surplus; sequestration
sequestration; surplus
debt; deficit
deficit; debt
Answers
Answer:
debt is the answer to everything related to college payment
Explanation:
at which point after the crime will a showup usually be considered invalid
Answers
A show up identification will typically be considered invalid if it occurs at a point where the procedure is unduly suggestive and likely to produce an unreliable identification.
Show up identification is a procedure where a single suspect is presented to a witness for identification shortly after the crime has occurred. The validity of a showup depends on whether it is conducted in a manner that ensures fairness and reliability. If the showup is conducted in an unduly suggestive way, it may lead to a mistaken or unreliable identification.
The point at which a showup is considered invalid is when the procedure becomes unduly suggestive. This can occur if the witness is presented with a single suspect in a highly suggestive manner, such as when the suspect is handcuffed, visibly different from other individuals, or the witness is given strong verbal or non-verbal cues suggesting the suspect's guilt. When these suggestive factors are present, the reliability of the identification becomes questionable, and the showup may be deemed invalid.
Courts and legal authorities evaluate the circumstances surrounding the showup, considering factors like the witness's perception, the timing of the identification, the presence of any suggestive elements, and the overall fairness of the procedure. If the showup is determined to be unduly suggestive and likely to produce an unreliable identification, it may be considered invalid, and the evidence resulting from it could be challenged in court. The goal is to ensure that identification procedures are conducted in a manner that minimizes the risk of misidentification and protects the rights of the accused.
To learn more about crime: -brainly.com/question/28311530#SPJ11
look up hess' law and discuss how this experiment is an illustration
Answers
Hess's Law states that the heat absorbed or released during a chemical reaction is the same, regardless of the number of steps or the sequence of the reaction. This law is based on the principle of energy conservation, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.
The experiment to illustrate Hess's Law involves determining the heat change that occurs in a chemical reaction by using two different methods. First, the heat change is determined for the reaction as it occurs in one step. Then, the reaction is broken down into several steps and the heat change is determined for each step.
The total heat change for all the steps is then calculated and compared to the heat change obtained from the one-step reaction. If Hess's Law is correct, the two results should be the same.
To read more about hess' law, visit-
https://brainly.com/question/30024746
#SPJ11
A guest presents an intact driver's license with a photo that resembles the ; however, the license expired a month agoWhat should the server/seller do?
Ask the guest for the date of birth on the license .
Tell the guest to recite the home address .
Check for all other features of a valid ID.
Refuse alcohol service .
Answers
Considering the situation described above, what the server or seller should do is that " Check for all other features of a valid ID."
When verifying an Identification of a guest, the seller should check all the features that make the ID valid. These features include the following:
Photo height and width must match guestThe birth and expiration dates;The size of the ID The color of the ID,The thickness of the IDThe corners of ID, to check for any tears, frays, etc.In the servesafe alcoholic test, the IDs that are considered acceptable include the following:
Drivers License,State ID card,Active military ID, Passport.Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "Check for all other features of a valid ID."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/23973470
____ is NOT an effective way to do research about a job you want.
A. Asking your friends about the company or the job.
B. Talking to a guidance counselor.
C. Online research about the company or the job.
D. Talking to someone currently in that job or company.
Answers
Answer:
A is the correct answer
explanation
you're friend may not be able to give you details about the job you want instead you should ask a friend who is currently in the job
(brainliest please)
Prison or Jail which is worse explain your answer
Answers
Answers for q1 and q2 all i need is 3 and 4 thank you
The rights and obligation of Mac and Lindy using Australian common law principles are as follows: The rights of Mac and Lindy using Australian common law principles are : 1- Rights to use Private property because Lindy can use the private parking for car for sometime it is her right to use that no one can towed her car and fine her at all. 2- Rights to use his contract for his personal things that cannot cancel the contract that Mac want to do that because the contract had signed and the money has paid to the Mac. So, he cannot do anything or cannot cancel the contract at all. The obligation of Mac and Lindy using Australian common law principles are : 1- Mac cannot rescind the contract at all becausw he is bound with the law because in the law we cannot cancel the contract after signing on it and after the payment of the production which the contract has been signed. 2- Lindy have to pay $420 dollars to the towing company because she is bounded with it because the matter has been gone to the towed company and to free her car she have to pay $420 dollars to the company because if towed company towed your car from private parking then you have to pay them fine at any cost no matter what.
Answers
The rights of Mac and Lindy using Australian common law principles are as follows:
1. Mac and Lindy have the right to use private property. Lindy can use the private parking for her car, and no one can tow or fine her for it.
2. Mac has the right to use the contract for his personal things. Once a contract is signed and payment is made, it cannot be canceled.
1. According to Australian common law principles, Lindy has the right to use the private parking for her car. This means that no one can tow her car or impose a fine on her for parking there.
2. Mac, on the other hand, has the right to use the contract for his personal things. Once a contract is signed and payment is made, it becomes binding. Mac cannot cancel the contract as he is obligated to fulfill the terms of the agreement.
In terms of obligations:
1. Mac is obligated to adhere to the contract he signed. According to Australian common law, a contract cannot be rescinded after it has been signed and payment has been made.
2. Lindy, however, is obligated to pay $420 to the towing company. If her car is towed from a private parking area, she is required to pay the fine imposed by the towing company to have her car released.
These rights and obligations are based on Australian common law principles and should be followed accordingly.
To know more about Australian law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32966682
#SPJ11
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally
Answers
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is commonly known as tort law.
Tort law is a branch of law that handles wrongful actions and their consequences. In this situation, the broken window of your home caused by someone else is classified as negligence. Negligence refers to a breach of duty to take reasonable care that causes harm or loss to another person. The person who broke the window of your home was not careful enough to prevent such damage, and as a result, you experienced financial harm or loss due to the cost of repair or replacement of the window.
Therefore, you are entitled to seek financial compensation or restitution from the person who broke the window. In order to claim financial restitution, you must prove that the person who broke your window was negligent, that you experienced harm or loss, and that the harm or loss was a direct result of the other person's negligence. If you can prove all of these elements, then you have a strong case for financial restitution.
In the event that the person who broke your window refuses to pay for the damages or is unable to do so, you can take them to court, where a judge or jury will evaluate the evidence and determine whether you are entitled to financial restitution. In conclusion, the set of laws that allows you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is governed by tort law, specifically the principles of negligence.
Know more about Tort law here:
https://brainly.com/question/33013975
#SPJ8
A recession causes the demand for jelly beans to fall. What happens to equilibrium price
and equilibrium quantity of jelly beans?
O Price Increases and Quantity Decreases
O Price Decreases and Quantity Increases
O Price and Quantity Decrease
Price and Quantity Increase
Answers
As a result of the recession causing the demand for jelly beans to fall, the effect on the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity is Price and Quantity Decrease.
When demand falls in a market for a certain good, then the demand curve would shift to the left. As a result of this shift, the demand curve would intersect the supply curve at a lower price and quantity level.
The reason this happens is that as less people demand the jelly beans, suppliers will produce less jelly beans and reduce the prices to encourage more people to buy which leads to a fall in both equilibrium price and quantity.
What is the equilibrium price?The equilibrium price in a market refers to the price of goods and services where the quantity supplied in the market is equal to the quantity demanded.
If demand falls in a market for a certain good, then the demand curve would shift to the left. As a result of this shift, the demand curve would intersect the supply curve at a lower price and quantity level.
This is as a result of less people demanding the jelly beans, suppliers will produce less jelly beans and reduce the prices to encourage more people to buy which leads to a fall in both equilibrium price and quantity.
Find out more on the effect of a fall in demand at https://brainly.com/question/24087897
#SPJ1
david is charged and tried for a cybercrime under a federal law. the jury acquits him (finds david not guilty). colorado, the state where david lived when committing the cybercrime, wants to charge and try david for state fraud claims arising out of the cybercrime. is this permitted under the fifth amendment?
Answers
Yes, it is generally permitted for a state to charge and try an individual for state crimes even after the individual has been acquitted of federal crimes arising from the same conduct.
The Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause only applies to federal criminal prosecutions, and does not bar state prosecutions for the same conduct. Therefore, Colorado would be within its rights to charge and try David for state fraud claims arising out of the cybercrime, even though he was acquitted by the federal government. The Fifth Amendment's protection against double jeopardy would not apply in this situation.
Learn more about federal crimes
https://brainly.com/question/5397409
#SPJ4
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Answers
A small amount of alcohol leaves the body through the skin, in the breath and in urine.
The amount of alcohol in the blood at any time varies depending on the amount, the strength and how quickly the alcohol is consumed. Individual factors also contribute, such as body type, age, gender and how well the liver can break down alcohol to use for energy.
Create a want ad for a member of Congress. In the ad, include qualifications, benefits and salary, and skills needed.
Answers
Answer:
wdym
Explanation:
Should prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause?
Answers
The double jeopardy clause, as outlined in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, prohibits an individual from being tried for the same crime twice. This principle is intended to protect citizens from being subjected to the trauma and financial burden of multiple trials for the same offense. However, there is ongoing debate about whether prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts should also be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause.
One argument for prohibiting prosecution in both state and federal courts is that it would prevent the government from using the legal system as a means of harassment or punishment. If an individual is acquitted or convicted in a state court, it would be unjust for them to be subjected to another trial in a federal court for the same crime. This would also prevent the government from using multiple trials as a means of securing a conviction, even if there is not enough evidence to support a guilty verdict in one court.
On the other hand, some argue that prosecution in both state and federal courts should not be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause because it allows for different levels of government to hold individuals accountable for their actions. For example, if a crime is committed on federal land or involves crossing state lines, it may be appropriate for both state and federal prosecutors to pursue charges. Additionally, some argue that prohibiting prosecution in both state and federal courts would hinder the government's ability to effectively combat organized crime or other complex criminal activities that may span multiple jurisdictions.
In conclusion, the double jeopardy clause is an important principle that is intended to protect citizens from being subjected to multiple trials for the same crime. However, whether prosecution in both state and federal courts should be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential consequences for citizens and the government's ability to effectively combat crime.
1. Where on a child's body would it be strange to find an injury not mentioned in the slides?
2. Who was Nixzmary Brown and what happened in her case (you may need to look her up on an external webpage)? What could have changed the outcome in this case?
3. Since neglect is the most common form of abuse, what are some of your ideas about prevention (list a minimum of two and explain the implementation)?
4. You are given a case to investigate. A 13-year-old child is addicted to drugs. The mother knows her child is doing drugs but does nothing about it. Is this a form of abuse? Explain your answer and include what type of abuse you conclude this falls under. If you determine that this is not an example of abuse, you must explain why you do not consider this abuse. What would you do in this case (as the investigator)? Explain why you answered the way you did.
Answers
1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange.
2. To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial.
3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives.
4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect.
1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange. However, injuries to certain areas such as the genitals, breasts, or inner thighs would typically raise concerns about possible abuse or inappropriate behavior. These areas are considered particularly sensitive, and injuries in these locations may indicate potential harm or mistreatment.
2. Nixzmary Brown was a seven-year-old girl who was tragically killed by her parents in 2006. Her case garnered significant media attention and exposed failures within the child welfare system. Nixzmary suffered from severe physical abuse and neglect, and her parents subjected her to prolonged abuse, leading to her death. The case revealed various systemic failures, including missed opportunities by child welfare agencies and schools to intervene and protect Nixzmary from her abusive parents.
To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial. Ensuring effective information sharing and collaboration between schools, child welfare agencies, law enforcement, and medical professionals would enable early detection and intervention in cases of child abuse. Additionally, enhancing training and awareness for professionals and the public regarding the signs of abuse and neglect can help identify and report cases more effectively.
3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives. Community support programs can provide resources and assistance to families in need, such as access to affordable housing, job training, mental health services, and childcare options. By addressing the underlying issues that contribute to neglect, such programs can help alleviate stressors and provide support to parents, reducing the likelihood of neglectful behaviors.
Parenting education initiatives are also essential in preventing neglect. These programs can offer classes and workshops that teach parents about child development, positive discipline techniques, communication skills, and stress management. By equipping parents with knowledge and skills, they can better understand their child's needs and respond appropriately, reducing the risk of neglect.
4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect. By ignoring the situation and not seeking help or intervention, the mother is failing to provide the necessary care and support her child requires.
This type of neglect falls under the category of physical neglect as it involves the failure to ensure the child's physical well-being and safety. Substance abuse can have severe consequences on a child's health, development, and overall welfare. Neglecting to address drug addiction puts the child at significant risk and can lead to long-term harm.
As an investigator, it would be important to assess the situation further, gather evidence, and determine the extent of the child's drug addiction and the impact it has on their well-being. The next steps would involve involving appropriate authorities, such as child protective services or law enforcement, to ensure the child's safety and initiate appropriate interventions. The goal would be to provide support and resources to the child and the family to address the addiction and mitigate further harm to the child's well-being.
Know more about Drug addiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12039156
#SPJ8
anti-federalists argued thatbranches of government would keep each other in constitution would make states less constitution would create a republican government.a republic should protect people from the government and from each other.
Answers
The Anti-Federalists expressed several concerns about the proposed Constitution and argued for certain measures to address those concerns.
Here are the key points you mentioned, along with an explanation: Checks and Balances: The Anti-Federalists believed that the checks and balances among the branches of government outlined in the Constitution would not be sufficient to prevent the consolidation of power. They feared that without stronger limitations, one branch could dominate the others, leading to an overly powerful central government.
State Sovereignty: The Anti-Federalists were concerned that the Constitution would diminish the authority and autonomy of individual states. They believed that a strong central government would undermine the ability of states to govern themselves and protect their own interests. They argued for greater state sovereignty and more explicit protections for states' rights.
Individual Rights: The Anti-Federalists contended that the Constitution lacked a comprehensive Bill of Rights. They emphasized the importance of protecting individual liberties from potential government abuses and believed that a formal enumeration of rights was necessary to safeguard the people from both the federal government and from each other.
Republican Government: The Anti-Federalists generally supported the idea of a republican form of government, which is characterized by elected representatives who act on behalf of the people. They believed that a republic was the most effective system for protecting individual freedoms and preventing the concentration of power.
In response to these concerns, the Federalists, who supported the ratification of the Constitution, agreed to the addition of the Bill of Rights, which would explicitly protect individual liberties and address the Anti-Federalists' worries about potential government encroachments. The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was subsequently added to the Constitution in 1791.
Ultimately, the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists shaped the compromise and compromises that led to the ratification of the Constitution, resulting in a stronger federal government while also establishing a system of checks and balances and protections for individual rights within a republican framework.
To know more about ,antifederalists click here:https://brainly.com/question/13838143
#SPJ11
Do workers across the globe have rights? How about those who
live near, or are impacted by industrial activities? We have laws
and regulations in the US to protect citizens and the environment.
Do peo
Answers
Yes, workers across the globe have rights, although the extent and enforcement of these rights may vary depending on the country and its labor laws. Similarly, individuals living near or impacted by industrial activities also have rights, including the right to a clean and healthy environment. However, the level of protection and enforcement can differ globally.
International organizations such as the International Labour Organization (ILO) have established fundamental labor standards that recognize the rights of workers worldwide. These standards cover areas such as freedom of association, collective bargaining, protection against discrimination, and safe working conditions. Many countries have implemented their own labor laws and regulations to protect workers' rights, although the effectiveness of enforcement can vary.
Regarding individuals impacted by industrial activities, various international and regional agreements emphasize the importance of environmental protection and the rights of affected communities. For example, the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being, including the right to a clean environment. Additionally, international agreements like the Paris Agreement on climate change and the Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation, and justice in environmental matters aim to protect the environment and ensure public participation in decision-making processes.
In the United States, specific laws and regulations are in place to protect workers and the environment. The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) establishes standards for workplace safety and health, ensuring that workers have the right to a safe working environment. Additionally, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces regulations to protect the environment and the health of communities. These laws and regulations are designed to safeguard citizens and the environment from the potential negative impacts of industrial activities.
However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of these laws and regulations can vary, both within countries and globally. Enforcement and compliance may face challenges in certain regions, leading to gaps in the protection of workers and communities impacted by industrial activities. Additionally, the global supply chain and outsourcing practices can pose challenges in ensuring consistent and comprehensive protection of rights across borders. Efforts are ongoing to improve and strengthen labor and environmental protections on a global scale through international cooperation, advocacy, and the development of sustainable business practices.
Learn more about ILO : brainly.com/question/32102902
#SPJ11
what type of contract is a license holder prohibited from completing because doing so would be considered the unauthorized practice of law?
Answers
A license holder is prohibited from completing a type of contract because doing so would be considered the unauthorized practice of law. The type of contract is a "fill-in-the-blank" contract.
Fill-in-the-blank contracts are contracts in which blanks are left for the user to fill in with terms and information that are specific to the contract's subject matter. The user then completes the contract by filling in the blanks with the necessary information.
The main problem with fill-in-the-blank contracts is that they are a one-size-fits-all approach to contracts, and they do not take into account the unique circumstances and needs of each party.The unauthorized practice of law occurs when someone who is not a licensed attorney or a licensed legal service provider engages in activities that are reserved for attorneys or legal service providers. Completing a fill-in-the-blank contract is considered the unauthorized practice of law because it involves the interpretation and application of legal terms, which is a legal service that is reserved for licensed attorneys.
To know more about licensed visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15829119
#SPJ11