Answers
Each agency that accesses FBI Criminal Justice Information (CJI) data should have a written policy in place outlining the steps to be taken during a security incident.
This policy helps ensure proper procedures are followed, safeguarding sensitive data and maintaining the integrity of the CJI system.
Importance of a written policy: A written policy serves as a formal and documented guide for agencies on how to handle security incidents involving CJI data.
It provides clear and consistent procedures that agencies should follow in the event of a security incident, such as a data breach, unauthorized access, or other security breaches.
A written policy helps ensure that all personnel are aware of the proper steps to take, minimizing the risk of confusion or mistakes during a high-stress situation.
Safeguarding sensitive data: CJI data is highly sensitive and contains confidential information about individuals, such as criminal history records, fingerprints, and other personal information.
Properly safeguarding this data is crucial to prevent unauthorized access or disclosure. A written policy should outline the necessary steps to be taken in the event of a security incident, including reporting the incident to the appropriate personnel, isolating affected systems or data, and implementing appropriate measures to prevent further damage or data loss.
Maintaining the integrity of the CJI system: The integrity of the CJI system is essential for maintaining public trust and confidence in the criminal justice system.
A security incident can compromise the integrity of CJI data and have serious consequences, including legal, financial, and reputational risks.
A written policy should outline the steps to be taken to maintain the integrity of the CJI system, such as conducting investigations, forensics, and audits to identify the cause and extent of the security incident, and taking appropriate actions to mitigate the impact and prevent future incidents.
To learn more about personnel, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30798368
#SPJ11
Yes, having a documented policy in place on security events is crucial for entities that have access to FBI Criminal Justice Information (CJI) data.
Yes, it is important for agencies that have access to FBI Criminal Justice Information (CJI) data to have a written policy in place regarding security incidents. This policy should outline the necessary actions to be taken in the event of a security breach or unauthorized access to the CJI data. Such policies are essential to ensure the protection of sensitive information and to maintain the integrity of the criminal justice system. It is the responsibility of each agency to ensure that their policies are up-to-date and comply with all relevant regulations and standards in order to prevent potential breaches and safeguard against criminal activity.
Learn more about crucial here
https://brainly.com/question/11064580
#SPJ11
Related Questions
records must be destroyed in accordance with the osd records disposition schedule. t or f
Answers
True. Records destruction must adhere to the OSD records disposition timetable.
What exactly is the OSD record?The Office of the Secretary of Defense, OSD Components, Defense Agencies, and Field Activities are the target audiences of the OSD Records and Information Management Program, which is responsible for managing the administration and upkeep of a practical and long-lasting records management program.
How often will the OSD dispose of its records?In the OSD Records Disposition Schedule, the procedures for discarding both temporary and permanent records are outlined. Personal records are classified as being private or secret, unrelated to, or not affecting the activities of an organization.
What goal does the records and information program of OSD serve?Regardless of its format or subject matter, the OSD Records and Information Program offers policies and procedures again for life-cycle management of information generated and received by OSD Components.
Learn more about OSD Records: https://brainly.com/question/30007230
#SPJ4
Whose job is it to protect the judge and others in the courtroom?
a) Police Officers
b) Bailiffs
c) Sheriffs
d) Special Agents
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Thomas is a 14-year-old student who applies for a job operating machinery at a local grocery store. Though he would make a good employee, the store manager declines to hire him. What law is this based on?
Answers
Answer: child labor law
Explanation: hes too young to be allowed to work legally
“Boundary fence question” A Neighbours shed wall is on the boundary line and a fence is built, as close to the shed as possible the palings are on our side. Is the fence line after 15 years taken as the new boundary line In adverse possession law (I live in Victoria, Australia.)?
Answers
No jurisdiction would give adverse possession to someone after only three years of inhabiting a sliver of property.
What exactly is an Adverse Possession?Adverse possession, also known colloquially as "squatter's rights," is a legal principle in Anglo-American common law that allows a person who does not have legal title to a piece of property—usually land (real property)—to acquire legal ownership through continuous possession or occupation of the property without the permission (license) of the property's legal owner. Possession by a person is not detrimental if they are in possession as the lawful owner's renter or licensee.
To learn more about adverse possession, click
https://brainly.com/question/29988444
#SPJ1
what type of citizen does a democracy need
Answers
A person is prosecuted for assaulting a neighbor.
Would this case be tried in a federal or state court
Answers
yuh!
When a person is prosecuted for assaulting a neighbor, then this case would be tried in a state court.
What is a state court?A court in the US that decides issues based on state law rather than federal law stockholder class actions settled by state courts must be recognised by federal courts. State legislation protecting the rights of people with disabilities allows them to file a claim for damages in state court.
The final decision-makers for state laws and constitutions are state courts. They may appeal to the US Supreme Court over how they interpret federal law or the US Constitution. Such cases may or may not be heard by the Supreme Court.
Therefore, when any of the cases or incidents like assaulting a neighbor is filed, this case will be tried in the state court.
Learn more about state court from here:
https://brainly.com/question/23041991
#SPJ2
A trucking company has clients that require them to deliver goods all over the
country. The company hires employees who live in various states and assigns
them delivery routes that allow them to be home as much as possible. One of
the drivers lives in a different state from where the trucking company is
located and feels that he is being denied benefits because of this. The
company says that the laws of their state do not require what the employee is
requesting. If the driver decides to pursue a legal case, which of the following
would most likely be true?
A. It is a matter of state law, and because the state laws might differ,
it is impossible to predict what the courts might decide.
B. The courts will likely end up requiring the governments of the two
states to change their laws so that they agree and do not
contradict one another.
C. The case would be heard in federal courts because the two parties
are from different states.
D. Because the driver is not from the same state as the company
itself, he is not allowed to bring a case against the company on
this matter.
Answers
It is a matter of state law, and because the state laws might differ, it is impossible to predict what the courts might decide is most likely to happen.
What is something the state government is responsible for?Defending individuals from neighbourhood dangers. Keeping up the legal system. Establishing regional governmental entities like counties and towns. Upkeep of state roadways and establishment of methods for controlling local roads.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about state government is responsible for, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2117668
#SPJ1
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
A higher minimum age for a corrections agency helps ensure _____. better understanding of the challenges faced by the offender population longer employment terms a more mature, responsible workforce better salaries
Answers
Answer:
A more mature, responsible workforce
Explanation:
Answer:
a more mature, responsible workforce
is it inappropriate to brew traditional beer in terms of south african law
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
In South Africa, brewing beer at home is legal for own consumption. However, it is illegal to sell the beer and now during the lock down period transporting alcohol is also prohibited.
Why might it be difficult to prosecute a citizen who violates its laws outside its borders, when the offence is not illegal in the country he or she is visiting?
Answers
Answer:
Anyone who commits a crime outside their country will be punished according to the local law of the receiving country. This has happened before for other Americans, some of whom made international headlines because of the crimes they were accused of. I think
Explanation:
in texas, special courtroom rules of evidence apply in the prosecution of sexual assault cases. which of the following is one of those special rules of evidence?
Answers
In Texas, one of the special rules of evidence that applies in the prosecution of sexual assault cases is the rule regarding the admissibility of evidence of a victim's past sexual behavior.
In Texas, the law is codified under Section 38.37 of the Texas Penal Code.
This rule generally prohibits the introduction of evidence or testimony about a victim's past sexual behavior or history, unless it falls within certain exceptions.
The purpose of this rule is to prevent the victim from being victimized again in court by having to disclose intimate details about their sexual history, which is not relevant to the issue of whether or not the sexual assault occurred.
However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. For example, evidence or testimony about the victim's past sexual behavior may be admissible if it is offered to show that someone other than the defendant was the source of semen, injury, or other physical evidence, or if it is relevant to the issue of consent.
To know more about sexual assault here:
https://brainly.com/question/28258441
#SPJ4
Which of the following was a former name for the FBI?
The Division of Investigation
The United States Bureau of Investigation
the US Secret Service
The National Bureau of Criminal Identification
Answers
Answer:
B The United States Bureau of Investigation
Explanation:
Answer:
all of them
A. the US Secret Service
B. The United States Bureau of Investigation
C. The National Bureau of Criminal Identification
D. The Division of Investigation
Explanation:
Question # 11
Multiple Select
There is huge competition for prosecutors’ jobs because:
They deal with high-stakes court cases.
Prosecutors are known for being among the best lawyers in the nation.
Most say the challenging work is also very rewarding.
They are paid extremely well.
Answers
Answer:
Probably 3. and 4. but it seems subjective
Explanation:
Prosecutors are known for being among the best lawyers in the nation.
They deal with high-stakes court cases.
Most say the challenging work is also very rewarding.
Just got it right : )
Sorry but I am unable to answer this question due to the honor code and must report you to the admins
Answers
Answer:
what ????????????????????
Why was the food safety modernization act passed? check all that apply.
Answers
The purposes of the Food Safety Modernization Act were:
Many citizens are in danger of contracting a food-borne illness.More people are living with chronic illnesses.Pathogens are becoming stronger and harder to defeat.What is the Food Safety Modernization Act?The Food Safety Modernization Act was enacted to prevent food-borne illnesses and ensure food safety.
The Food Safety Modernization Act overhauled food production regulations, giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) more authority in overseeing and enforcing food supply chains.
Thus, the Food Safety Modernization Act prevents food-related problems from arising from the production stage to the consumption stage.
Learn more about the Food Safety Modernization Act at https://brainly.com/question/13653111
What is the name of the person whom the complaint is filed against
Answers
what defineds by population, territory, government, and sovereignty?
Answers
In a criminal trial, the 5th Amendment requires the accused person to testify.
True or False
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answers
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
True/ False .he process of finding employment in the criminal justice system is very similar to the process of finding employment in many other professional fields.
Answers
The statement " The process of finding employment in the criminal justice system is very similar to the process of finding employment in many other professional fields is true as it follows the same procedure and has same jobs.
Those who have been accused of committing crimes receive justice through the criminal justice system. A number of governmental organizations make up the criminal justice system. The rehabilitative of offenders, deterrence of other crimes, and moral support for victims are objectives.
The police, attorneys representing both the prosecution and defense, the courts, and the prison system are the main institutions of the criminal justice system.
The police (or other law enforcement) are typically a defendant's first point of contact with the criminal justice system. They conduct an investigation into any alleged wrongdoing and make an arrest, but if the suspect poses a threat to the safety of the entire country, a national law enforcement agency is contacted.
Police officers and law enforcement organizations are permitted to use force and other physical measures when necessary
To know more about criminal justice here
https://brainly.com/question/5111667
#SPJ4
. Bills may be introduced in each house (also called a chamber) of Congress only by
a. a member of that house.
b. the President or a Cabinet member
c. a member of the Supreme Court
d. the President Pro-tempore of the Senate or the Speaker of the House
Answers
Answer: A member of that house lol just do it
Explanation:
T/F the power of the federal government to completely regulate an activity, to the exclusion of any state regulation, is the power of occlusion.
Answers
True,the power of the federal government to completely regulate an activity, to the exclusion of any state regulation, is the power of occlusion.
The United States federal government (U.S. federal government or U.S. government) is the national government of the United States, a federal republic primarily located in North America, consisting of 50 states, a city within a federal district (the city of Washington in the District of Columbia, where the majority of the federal government is based), five major self-governing territories, and several island possessions.
The federal government, also known as Washington, is divided into three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.
Learn more about federal government
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
I need help with this two question urgently, please help me and I will appreciate it but please don't copy and paste off the internet! Thank you so much in advanced, by the way this is a Criminology class.
Answers
Answer: Positivism- it's a philosophy of every justifiable assertion can be backed up by science and mathematical proof.
Rational theory- Refers to the theory of why humans behave as they might what causes certain behaviours.
Explanation:
The first US marshals were appointed by _____.
Answers
Answer:
Former late president George Washington
Explanation:
Adams sues both nye and the "ellen"show for libel. She says that while it is true she has no medical background, she has studied the science involved in the tests. And she has never lied; the charge is false and defamatory. How would a court rule on these arguments? answers
Answers
The court would need to consider the specific evidence and arguments presented by both parties before making a ruling on Adams' claims of libel against Nye and "The Ellen Show."
The court would assess the truthfulness of the statements made about Adams' qualifications and whether they meet the legal standards for defamation.
In a libel case, the court would evaluate the evidence presented by Adams and the defendants to determine the truthfulness of the statements in question. Adams asserts that she has studied the science involved in the tests, despite lacking a medical background. The court would likely consider whether Adams' claim of studying the science can be substantiated and whether it supports her assertion that the defendants made false and defamatory statements about her.
The court would also assess whether Adams' claim of never lying is true and relevant to the case. If the defendants can provide evidence that Adams has made false statements or misrepresentations in the past, it could weaken her argument that the charge is false and defamatory.
Ultimately, the court would weigh the evidence and arguments from both sides to determine whether the defendants' statements meet the legal criteria for libel. Factors such as the truthfulness of the statements, the intent behind them, and their potential impact on Adams' reputation would be considered in the court's ruling.
Learn more about The Ellen Show here:
https://brainly.com/question/2508232
#SPJ11
Mbumwae, who resides in shimabala village, finds small pieces of wood with a black cloth around a dead lizard with a letter threatening that someone was to die soon in his village. Later the same day, his son starts vomiting and is admitted in hospital. The wife decides that they should take their son to Mwaziona, a famous witch doctor in within Shimabala. They consult the village headman who encourages this move saying that is the only way to sort out witches in his village. The witch doctor clearly told everyone the sickness was caused by Mbumwae's uncle, Illunga. Upon hearing this they all quickly rush to Illunga's house and burn it down after discovering that Illunga had travelled. Illunga hears about it and is afraid of his life. He then approaches you as a paralegal for advice. Advice him on the law governing witchcraft practices and whether there are any available remedies for him
Answers
I can explain that witchcraft is not recognized as a legal defense or practice in many countries. The law usually prohibits harmful practices and beliefs that cause harm to others. It is essential to seek help from law enforcement authorities if someone is threatened or harmed. Burning down someone's property is a criminal offense, and it is crucial to report it to the police.
In this case, the actions of the villagers were unlawful, and they could be held liable for the damages caused to Illunga's property. It is essential to encourage community members to seek help from medical professionals instead of relying on witch doctors or superstitions. They should also be educated about the dangers of mob justice and the importance of following the law.
30. Why do federal judges/justices receive lifetime appointments?
Answers
Answer: The Supreme Court acts as a check against the power of Congress and the president. The lifetime appointment is designed to ensure that the justices are insulated from political pressure and that the court can serve as a truly independent branch of government.
One of a physician’s patients, a well-respected citizen in a small community, saw the doctor with a complaint of blood in his urine (hematuria). The physician asked the patient if he’d had any new sexual partners recently, and the patient admitted that he had. The physician explained to the patient that his urine specimen had been positive for the STI chlamydia. The physician urged the patient to discuss his medical condition with the patient’s wife, who was also the physician’s patient, but the man was reluctant.
Discussion Questions:
If the patient refuses to confide in the wife, what should the physician do?
What are the legal issues in this case? What are the ethical issues?
Answers
Answer:
The physician must:
*report the communicable disease to the appropriate authorities
*Warn the patient that he must do so.*
Hopefully, the patient will speak with his wife
Legal issues: Patient confidentiality: reporting a communicable disease.
Ethics issues: Notifying the wife
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
The physician must: report the communicable disease to the appropriate authorities, Warn the patient that he must do so. Hopefully, the patient will speak with his wife Legal issues: Patient confidentiality: reporting a communicable disease.Ethics issues: Notifying the wife.
What is communicable disease?A communicable disease is one that can spread from one person to another by a variety of channels, including contact with blood or bodily fluids, breathing in an airborne virus, or being bitten by an insect.
Infectious infections that must be reported include HIV, hepatitis A, B, and C, measles, salmonella, measles, and blood-borne illnesses. The most frequent methods of transmission are feces-oral transmission, food transmission, sexual contact, insect bites, contact with contaminated formice, droplets, or skin contact.
Thus, The physician must: report the communicable disease.
For more information about communicable disease, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27330218
#SPJ2
5. Type of government where the central
government has all the power
6. Type of government where states and a central
government share power
10. Special name for powers that both the states
and federal government share
12. Powers that are actually stated in the
Constitution
13. The federal government gets all of its power
from this.
Answers
Answer: 5 is Federal
6. Federalism
10. Is Concurrent powers
12. Is Army and Navy
13. Is The Constitution
Explanation:
If I want to become a lawyer, what elective course should I take?
Graphic Design
Introduction to Marketing
Painting and Sketching
Earth and Space Science
Health and Nutrition
Artificial Intelligence I
Answers
Answer:
Artificial Intelligence I or Introduction to marketing
Explanation:
Learning about artificial intelligence may help with certain cases, like figuring out what happened here or how we can use technology to our advantage. Marketing can also help us gain customers. However graphic design doesn't sound too good, because I dont think it's related to becoming a lawyer. Painting and sketching can help to illustrate certain items but may be unrelated. I think my answers are th eone who are best (In my opinion) suited answers for this question