does anyone know how to do this ?

Answer:

The distance between the two is 465 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

We first need to set up a triangle that shows the relative position and distances of the two friends

Please check attachment for this

To get this distance, which represents the hypotenuse of the triangle, we make use of Pythagoras’ theorem

Mathematically;

Pythagoras’ theorem states that the square of the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the two other sides

Thus;

D^2 = 256^2 + 388^2

D^2 = 216,080

D = √216,080

D = 464.84 which is approximately 465 m

The geometric transformation is shown in the line of music is a glide reflection

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The line of music

In the line of music, we have the following transfromations

When the two transformations i.e. reflection and translation are combined, the result is a glide reflection

This means that the geometric transformation is shown in the line of music is a glide reflection

Read more about glide reflection at

https://brainly.com/question/12604476

#SPJ1

Elaine saw statistics showing that union employees make an average of 30 percent more than nonunion workers, so when she was looking for a new job, she looked for one at a company that was unionized. Elaine was motivated by Economic needs.

By economic need Elaine is trying to get a company that would pay her more. Hence the need to go for the Unionized company.

This is given that the Unionized company is said to earn more than the other company. Hence her motivation is due to her economic needs.

Read more on economic needs here:

https://brainly.com/question/17889008

#SPJ1

(a) cubic function with three significant digit coefficients: P(t) = 150.7 + 0.358t - 0.000219t^2 + 0.0000012t^3.

(b)  function that models the instantaneous rate of change of the U.S. population : P'(t) = 0.358 - 0.000438t + 0.0000036t^2

(c) So, in 2000, the U.S. population was growing at a rate of 0.168 million people per year, and in 2025 it will be growing at a rate of 0.301 million people per year.

(a) To model the U.S. population in millions, we need a cubic function with three significant digit coefficients. Let's first find the slope of the curve at t=0, which is the initial rate of change:
P'(0) = 0.358

Now, we can use the point-slope form of a line to find the cubic function:
P(t) - P(0) = P'(0)t + at^2 + bt^3

Plugging in the values we know, we get:
P(t) - 150.7 = 0.358t + at^2 + bt^3

Next, we need to find the values of a and b. To do this, we can use the other two data points:
P(25) - 150.7 = 0.358(25) + a(25)^2 + b(25)^3
P(50) - 150.7 = 0.358(50) + a(50)^2 + b(50)^3

Simplifying these equations, we get:
P(25) = 168.45 + 625a + 15625b
P(50) = 186.2 + 2500a + 125000b

Now, we can solve for a and b using a system of equations. Subtracting the first equation from the second, we get:
P(50) - P(25) = 17.75 + 1875a + 118375b

Substituting in the values we just found, we get:
17.75 + 1875a + 118375b = 17.75 + 562.5 + 15625a + 390625b

Simplifying, we get:
-139.75 = 14000a + 272250b

Similarly, substituting the values we know into the first equation, we get:
18.75 = 875a + 15625b

Now we have two equations with two unknowns, which we can solve using algebra. Solving for a and b, we get:

a = -0.000219
b = 0.0000012

Plugging these values back into the original equation, we get our cubic function:
P(t) = 150.7 + 0.358t - 0.000219t^2 + 0.0000012t^3

(b) To find the function that models the instantaneous rate of change of the U.S. population, we need to take the derivative of our cubic function:
P'(t) = 0.358 - 0.000438t + 0.0000036t^2

(c) Finally, we can find the instantaneous rates of change in 2000 and 2025 by plugging those values into our derivative function:
P'(50) = 0.358 - 0.000438(50) + 0.0000036(50)^2 = 0.168 million people per year
P'(75) = 0.358 - 0.000438(75) + 0.0000036(75)^2 = 0.301 million people per year

So in 2000, the U.S. population was growing at a rate of 0.168 million people per year, and in 2025 it will be growing at a rate of 0.301 million people per year. This shows that the population growth rate is increasing over time.

Know more about the cubic function

https://brainly.com/question/20896994

#SPJ11

Answer:

2.5*10^4

I hope this helps

Answer:

2.5 x 10^4

this is a filler. I hope this helps though :)))))

we can answer specific questions regarding arrival rates or time intervals between arrivals based on the given average rate of arrivals per hour.

In a Poisson distribution, the average rate of arrivals (λ) is equal to both the mean and the variance. In this case, the average number of arrivals per hour is 7, so λ = 7.

To answer specific questions, we can use the Poisson probability formula. For example, to find the probability of a certain number of arrivals within a given time interval, we would substitute the desired value of arrivals (k) into the formula:

P(X = k) = (\(e^(-λ\)) *\(λ^k\)) / k!

To find the probability of a certain time interval between arrivals, we can use the fact that the Poisson distribution also models the time between events. We can calculate the probability of a specific time interval (t) using the formula:

P(T = t) = (\(e^(-λt)\)* \((λt)^k)\) / k!

Where λt is the average number of arrivals within the time interval t.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think that is correct because I got the same answer

The mean of the data set, 6, 11, 5, 2, 7, is: 6.2.

The mean of a data set is the average of the data points or the sum of all the data points divided by the total number of data points in the data set.

Given the data set, 6, 11, 5, 2, 7:

Mean = (6 + 11 + 5 + 2 + 7)/5

Mean = 31/5

Mean = 6.2

Therefore, the mean of the data set, 6, 11, 5, 2, 7, is: 6.2.

Learn more about the mean on:

https://brainly.com/question/19243813

Answer:

6.2

Step-by-step explanation:

The assumption that is not typically associated with linear programming models is A) normality.

Linear programming models do not assume normality of the variables or the distribution of the data. Linear programming deals with optimizing linear objective functions subject to linear constraints, without any specific assumptions about the underlying distribution of the data. The focus is on finding the optimal solution within the feasible region defined by the constraints.

The other assumptions mentioned in the options are commonly associated with linear programming models:

B) Certainty: Linear programming assumes that all the data and parameters are known with certainty.

C) Divisibility: Linear programming assumes that variables can take fractional or continuous values. This assumption allows for finding optimal solutions that may involve non-integer values for the decision variables.

D) Linearity: Linear programming models assume that the objective function and the constraints are linear in nature. This means that the variables appear in a linear form, without any multiplication or exponentiation.

E) Nonnegativity: Linear programming assumes that the decision variables cannot take negative values, and they are nonnegative or zero.

These assumptions collectively form the foundation for linear programming models and help in formulating and solving optimization problems efficiently.

Learn more about linear here:

https://brainly.com/question/31510530

#SPJ11

To find the expected value of the probability distribution, we need to multiply each value by its corresponding probability, then add up the results. So, we have:

0 * 0.3 + 1 * 0.25 + 2 * 0.3 + 3 * 0.15 = 0 + 0.25 + 0.6 + 0.45 = 1.3

Therefore, the expected value of the probability distribution is 1.3.

To find the standard deviation of the probability distribution, we need to use the formula:

σ = sqrt(∑(x-μ)²p)

Where σ is the standard deviation, μ is the expected value, x is each value, and p is its corresponding probability.

So, we have:

σ = sqrt((0-1.3)² * 0.3 + (1-1.3)² * 0.25 + (2-1.3)² * 0.3 + (3-1.3)² * 0.15)

σ = sqrt(0.69 * 0.3 + 0.09 * 0.25 + 0.49 * 0.3 + 1.69 * 0.15)

σ = sqrt(0.207 + 0.0225 + 0.147 + 0.2535)

σ = sqrt(0.63)

σ = 0.79

Therefore, the standard deviation of the probability distribution is 0.79.

the expected value of the probability distribution is 1.3 and the standard deviation is 0.79.

To learn more about deviation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31835352

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

\(f(x)=-x^3-7x^2-7x+15\\Prove:\ x_1=-5\ \ \ \ x_2=-3\ \ \ \ x_3=1\ at\ f(x)=0\\\\-x^3-7x^2-7x+15=0\)

Multiply both parts of the equation by -1:

\(x^3+7x^2+7x-15=0\\x^3+5x^2+2x^2+7x-15=0\\x^2*(x+5)+(2x^2+7x-15)=0\\x^2*(x+5)+(2x^2+10x-3x-15)=0\\x^2*(x+5)+(2x*(x+5)-3*(x+5))=0\\x^2*(x+5)+(x+5)*(2x-3)=0\\(x+5)*(x^2+2x-3)=0\\x+5=0\\x=-5\\x^2+2x-3=0\\x^2+3x-x-3=0\\x*(x+3)-(x+3)=0\\(x+3)*(x-1)=0\\x+3=0\\x=-3\\x-1=0\\x=1\)

In this case, we'll have to carry out several steps to find the solution.

Step 01:

Data:

5 groups ===> 1

1 group ====> 5

Step 02:

We must apply the algebraic rules to find the solution.

5 groups * 1 = 1 group * 5

5 * 1 = 1 * 5

5 = 5

The answer is:

Brent is correct

∫[4, 6] f(x) dx = ∫[4, 6] (18x - 3) dx = [9x^2 - 3x] evaluated from 4 to 6 = (9(6)^2 - 3(6)) - (9(4)^2 - 3(4)).

∫[0, 2] f(x) dx = ∫[0, 2] (18x - 3) dx = [9x^2 - 3x] evaluated from 0 to 2 = (9(2)^2 - 3(2)) - (9(0)^2 - 3(0)).

E(x) = ∫[0, ∞] x f(x) dx = ∫[0, ∞] x(18x - 3) dx = [3x^3 - (3/2)x^2] evaluated from 0 to ∞ = lim(a→∞) [(3a^3 - (3/2)a^2) - (3(0)^3 - (3/2)(0)^2)].

a) To find the probability that the television set lasts between 4 and 6 years, we need to calculate the integral of the density function f(x) over the interval [4, 6]. Since the density function is given by f(x) = 18x - 3 for 0 ≤ x < 3 and 0 for x ≥ 3, we have:

∫[4, 6] f(x) dx = ∫[4, 6] (18x - 3) dx = [9x^2 - 3x] evaluated from 4 to 6 = (9(6)^2 - 3(6)) - (9(4)^2 - 3(4)).

b) To find the probability that the television set lasts at least 5 years, we need to calculate the integral of the density function f(x) over the interval [5, ∞). However, since the density function is zero for x ≥ 3, the integral over this interval is zero.

c) To find the probability that the television set lasts less than 2 years, we need to calculate the integral of the density function f(x) over the interval [0, 2]. Since the density function is given by f(x) = 18x - 3 for 0 ≤ x < 3 and 0 for x ≥ 3, the integral becomes:

∫[0, 2] f(x) dx = ∫[0, 2] (18x - 3) dx = [9x^2 - 3x] evaluated from 0 to 2 = (9(2)^2 - 3(2)) - (9(0)^2 - 3(0)).

d) To find the probability that the television set lasts exactly 4.18 years, we need to evaluate the density function f(x) at x = 4.18. Plugging in the value of x into the density function, we get f(4.18) = 18(4.18) - 3.

e) To find the expected value of the number of years that the television set lasts, we need to calculate the integral of xf(x) over the entire range of x, which is [0, ∞). The expected value is given by:

E(x) = ∫[0, ∞] x f(x) dx = ∫[0, ∞] x(18x - 3) dx = [3x^3 - (3/2)x^2] evaluated from 0 to ∞ = lim(a→∞) [(3a^3 - (3/2)a^2) - (3(0)^3 - (3/2)(0)^2)].

To learn more about Probability click here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

1.not proportional

2.proportional:

Step-by-step explanation:

the first one has no constant rate meanwhile the second table goes up 14 for every 10 in y

13.41% is the cash coverage ratio.

To find the cash coverage ratio:

The cash coverage ratio is calculated as follows:

But first, the EBIDTA Is:

The Cash Coverage Ratio is now:

Therefore, 13.41% is the cash coverage ratio.

Know more about the cash coverage ratio here:

https://brainly.com/question/14521400

#SPJ4

Answer:

5/8, 1/4, 3/16

Step-by-step explanation:

Put them all into sixteenths:

4/16, 10/16, 3/16

Order numbers:

10/16, 4/16, 3/16

Or

5/8, 1/4, 3/16

Hope this helps! :)

The equation that requires the multiplication property of equality to be solved is:

\(\boxed{\sf \dfrac{a}{6}=420}\)

Multiplication property of equality states that if both the sides of an equation are multiplied by the same number, the expressions on the both sides of the equation remain equal to each other.

The multiplication property states that:

Out of the given options, \({\sf \dfrac{a}{6}=420}\) requires the multiplication property of equality to be solved.

That is:

\(\text{If} \ {\sf \dfrac{a}{6}=420}\)

\({\sf \dfrac{a}{6}\times6=420\times6\)

\(\sf a=2520\)

Hence, the equation that requires the multiplication property of equality to be solved is:

\({\sf \dfrac{a}{6}=420}\)

Learn more about the multiplication property of equality at:

https://brainly.com/question/30789406

Answer:

35/9

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer to the following question is 1,0.1443, -0.2533 and 49.99.

To calculate we procced in following manner:

a. First, we need to standardize the value of 492 using the formula z = (X - μ) / σ. Substituting the given values, we get z = (492 - 50) / 4 = 110.5. Using a standard normal table or calculator, the probability of a z-score less than 110.5 is essentially 1, so P(X < 492) ≈ 1.

b. Following the same process, we standardize the values of 49 and 50.5 to get z-scores of (49 - 50) / 4 = -0.25 and (50.5 - 50) / 4 = 0.125. Using a standard normal table or calculator, the probability of a z-score between -0.25 and 0.125 is approximately 0.1443, so P(49 < X < 50.5) ≈ 0.1443.

c. To find the value of X such that there is a 40% chance that X is above that value, we need to find the z-score such that the area to the right of it is 0.4. Using a standard normal table or calculator, we find that the z-score is approximately -0.2533.

Standardizing this value using the formula z = (X - μ) / σ and solving for X, we get X = σz + μ = 4(-0.2533) + 50 = 49.9868. Therefore, there is a 40% chance that X is above 49.99 (rounded to two decimal places).

For more similar questions on calculator:

https://brainly.com/question/4470511

#SPJ11

Answer:

Problem Solving

The total costs of two oranges and two bananas is 62 cents.

Step-by-step explanation:

5 oranges + 1 banana = 87 cents

1 orange + 5 bananas = 99 cents

Let x represent the oranges and x for the bananas. Thus 5x + y = 87 and x + 5y = 99. Solve x using substitution method. If 5x + y = 87, then y = -5x + 87. Substitute this equation to the second equation: x + 5(-5x + 87) = 99. x + (-25x) + 435 = 99. Simplify by combining the similar terms of the equation: -24x = 99 - 435. -24x = -336. Divide both sides of the equation by 24 to get the value of x. Therefore, x = -336/-24, x = 14 cents. Each orange costs 14 cents.

Compute for the price of a banana using the second equation: x + 5y = 99. Replace x with 14. 14 + 5y = 99. 5y = 99 - 14. 5y = 85. Divide both sides of the equation by 5 then y = 17 cents.

Now, find the cost of two oranges and two bananas: 2x + 2y = 2(14 cents) + 2(17 cents) = 28 + 34 cents. Therefore, two oranges and two bananas costs 62 cents.

Answer:

The answer is the first option; 6^1/12

Step-by-step explanation:

We can simplify the question by using the radical rule to rewrite it as
6^1/3 ÷ 6^1/4

Then we use exponent rule which states that when we are dividing exponents of the same base, we have to subtract them. We see that the exponents are 1/3 and 1/4. So we use basic fractional division, here's the subtraction:

= 1/3 - 1/4
= 4/3 - 3/4 (we criss-crossed)
= 1/12 (we subtracted the denominators and multiplied the denominators)

Now that we have subtracted the exponents, we can write the answer as 6^1/12

Answer:

Option #1: \(6\frac{1}{2}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

#1: Multiply \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6}}{\sqrt[4]{6}}\) and \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6}}{\sqrt[4]{6}}\):

\(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6}}{\sqrt[4]{6}} * \frac{\sqrt[3]{6}}{\sqrt[4]{6}}\)

#2: Combine and simplify the denominator:

- Multiply \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6}}{\sqrt[4]{6}}\) by \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6}}{\sqrt[4]{6}}\) = \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6} \sqrt[4]{6}^{3} }{\sqrt[4]{6} \sqrt[4]{6}^3}\)

- Raise \(\sqrt[4]{6}\) to the power of 1

- Use the power rule \(a^{m} a^{n} =a^{m+n}\) to combine exponents: \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6} \sqrt[4]{6}^{3} }{\sqrt[4]{6}^{1+3}}\)

- Add 1 and 3

- Rewrite \(\sqrt[4]{6}^4\) as 6: \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6} \sqrt[4]{6}^3}{6}\)

#3: Simplify the numerator:

- Rewrite the expression using the least common index of 12: \(\frac{\sqrt[12]{6^4} \sqrt[12]{216^3}}{6}\)

- Combine using the product rule for radicals: \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6^4 *216^3}}{6}\)

- Rewrite 216 as \(6^3\): \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6^{4}*(6^{3})^{3}}}{6}\)

- Multiply the exponents in \((6^{3})^3\): \(\frac{\sqrt[12]{6^{4}*6^{9}}}{6}\)

- Use the power rule \(a^{m}a^{n}=a^{m+n}\) to combine exponents and add \(4+9\):

\(\frac{\sqrt[12]{6^{13}}}{6}\)

- Raise 6 to the power of 16: \(\frac{\sqrt[12]{13060694016}}{6}\)

- Rewrite 13060694016 as \(6^{12}*6\): \(\frac{\sqrt[12]{6^{12}*6}}{6}\)

- Pull terms out from under the radical: \(\frac{6\sqrt[12]{6}}{6}\)

#4: Cancel the common factor of 6:

\(\frac{\sqrt[12]{6}}{6}=6\frac{1}{2}\)

The correct simplified answer for \(\frac{\sqrt[3]{6}}{\sqrt[4]{6}}\) is Option #1: \(6\frac{1}{2}\).

Answer:

B = 119! The answer is 119!

Step-by-step explanation:  

The Jacobi iteration scheme for the matrix problem in part (e) can be described as follows:

1. Start with an initial vector \(\phi ^{(0)} = [1, 1]^T\).

2. For each iteration, calculate the updated values of \(\phi^{(k+1)\) using the formula:

 \(\phi^{(k+1)}_i = (b_i - \sum (A_{ij} * \phi^{(k)}_j)) / A_{ii}, for\ i = 0, 1.\)

3. Repeat the iteration process until convergence is achieved.

The Jacobi iteration scheme is an iterative method used to approximate solutions to linear systems of equations. In this case, it can be applied to solve the matrix problem described in part (e).

The scheme starts with an initial guess for the solution and iteratively updates the solution until convergence is reached.

To calculate each iteration, the scheme uses the formula where the updated value of each element \(\phi_i^{(k+1)\) is determined by subtracting the sum of the products of the matrix elements \(A_{ij\) with the corresponding elements \(\phi_j^{(k)\) in the previous iteration from the right-hand side vector \(b_i\), and then dividing the result by the diagonal element \(A_{ii\).

The spectral radius of the iteration matrix, denoted by ρ, can be calculated by finding the maximum absolute eigenvalue of the matrix.

The convergence of the Jacobi iteration method is determined by the value of the spectral radius.

If ρ is less than 1, the method converges. If ρ is equal to 1, the convergence is uncertain, and if ρ is greater than 1, the method diverges.

By performing one iteration starting with the given initial vector \(\phi^{(0)} = [1, 1]^T\), the updated solution \(\phi^{(1)\) can be obtained.

The error of the initial approximate solution \(\epsilon_0\) can be calculated as the absolute difference between \(\phi^{(0)\) and the exact solution \(\phi^{(e)\).

Similarly, the error of the solution after one iteration \(\epsilon_1\) can be calculated as the absolute difference between \(\phi^{(1)\) and \(\phi^{(e)\).

The convergence of the Jacobi iteration method is closely related to the spectral radius. If the spectral radius is less than 1, the method is more likely to converge quickly.

However, if the spectral radius is close to 1 or greater than 1, the convergence may be slower or the method may not converge at all.

The Jacobi iteration scheme is just one of several iterative methods used to solve linear systems of equations.

Other methods, such as Gauss-Seidel and Successive Overrelaxation (SOR), can also be employed depending on the specific problem and its characteristics.

Convergence analysis and spectral radius calculation play important roles in determining the effectiveness and efficiency of iterative methods.

Understanding these concepts can help identify suitable methods for solving matrix problems and assess their convergence properties.

Learn more about Jacobi iteration scheme

brainly.com/question/31565159

#SPJ11

The expected value of x in the scenario given is 9/2.

Since each coin has two possible outcomes (H or T), the total number of possible outcomes for all three coins is 2 * 2 * 2 = 8.

Let's calculate the points awarded for each possible outcome:

HHH: 3 points + 3 points + 3 points = 9 points

HHT, HTH, THH: 3 points + 3 points + 0 points = 6 points

HTT, TTH, THT: 3 points + 0 points + 0 points = 3 points

TTT: 0 points + 0 points + 0 points = 0 points

Now, let's calculate the probability of each outcome:

Probability of HHH: 1/8

Probability of HHT, HTH, THH: 3/8

Probability of HTT, TTH, THT: 3/8

Probability of TTT: 1/8

To find the expected value, we multiply each outcome's points by its probability and sum them up:

Expected value (E(x)) = (9 * 1/8) + (6 * 3/8) + (3 * 3/8) + (0 * 1/8) = 9/2

Therefore, the expected value is 9/2.

Learn more on expected value :https://brainly.com/question/14723169

#SPJ4

Answer:

it’s A

Step-by-step explanation:

i took it on flocabulary

Answer:

lolzz i just got that question. it's A

Step-by-step explanation:

hope ya have a good day

Based on the fact that in the simple random variable, 5 is the sample mean, then it is a d. point estimate.

A point estimate refers to a specific value in a random group of variables that tell us more about the variables.

The mean is therefore a point estimate as it tells us the average value amounts the random sample of 31 observations.

Find out more on point estimates at https://brainly.com/question/24261796

#SPJ4