Answer:
I haven't even learned that yet
What role did militarism play in causing WWI?
Answer:
Explanation:
The main event of Militarism causing World War one was the naval rivalry which was made after 1900. While Britain and Germany built up their navies, the major powers on mainland Europe were also building up their armies.
Hope this helped!!!
what was the purpose of Nikita khrushev de-stalinization program in the U.S.S.R?
Answer:
To bring the USSR in the modern global market and open trade/relations with the West.
Explanation:
Answer:
to correct the negative image that Stalin's extreme policies had given communism
Explanation:
The mission of Nikita Khrushchev’s De-Stalinization program was to denounce the cruel dictatorship of Stalin. However, the new leader of the Soviet Union was still anti-capitalism.
Also, I took the quiz.
Which US president embraced the idea of Manifest Destiny and championed expansion in the late 1840s?
A. John Pierce
B. John Adams
C. James Gadsden
D. James Polk
Answer is: D on edge
Answer:
James Polk
Explanation:
S. "... this Constitution, is really in its formation a govemnment of the people; that is to say, a govemment in which all
power is derived from, and at stated period reverts to them
and that, in its operation, it is purely, a government of
Laws made & executed by the fair substitutes of the people alone."
George Washington, fragment from discarded Inaugural Address, 1789
This idea belongs to what philosopher:
Concept:
Answer:
The idea belongs to Abraham Lincoln
According to Abraham Lincoln whom was a former president of the United States, he stated that democracy is the government of the people, and that it is by the people, and should also be for the people.
Democracy is a Greek language and it means to rule by the people.
In a democratic government, the people elect the leaders whom then represent them and give feedback to them and make policies that suit them.
In conclusion, the idea of the fragment from the discarded Inaugural Address, 1789 by George Washington is by Abraham Lincoln.
What are some likely reasons that many middle-class british believed in the theories of laissez-faire capitalism and the free-market system in the 1800s?
Middle class believed in capitalism because they were know able to afford what would have been luxuries before industrial revolution they saw thee standard of living go up and were able to make more money allowing them to have more enjoyment in life, they also were given more political power and the ability to move up in social class.
Laissez-faire is a policy of minimal government intervention in individuals' and society's economic affairs. The doctrine of laissez-faire is commonly associated with the Physiocrats, a group of economists who flourished in France from about 1756 to 1778. In French, the term laissez-faire means "allow to do."
To know more about Laissez-faire here
https://brainly.com/question/17259480
#SPJ4
Which idea from this passage appeals to ethos?
the idea that his dream is different than democracy
the statement that each individual has certain basic rights
the language of the declaration is carefully chosen and eloquent
the suggestion that every American deserves to be remembered
Answer: The language of the declaration is carefully chosen and eloquent
Explanation: Ethos is all about establishing credibility and making yourself sound intellegent to get the audiece on your side. if you use weird slang and unintelligable words then people won't take you as seriously.
Answer:
the statement that each individual has certain basic rights
Explanation:
just did it
Was Mongol rule good or bad for China? Support your
Opinion with evidence from the chapter.
Answer:
The Mongol rule in China, which began with the Yuan dynasty (1271-1368), had both positive and negative impacts on the country.
One positive impact was the expansion of trade and the promotion of economic exchange between China and the rest of the world. The Mongols supported the development of the Silk Road, which helped to connect China to Europe and the Middle East. This led to the introduction of new goods and technologies into China, and contributed to the growth of the Chinese economy.
However, there were also negative aspects of Mongol rule in China. The Mongols were a minority group, and many Han Chinese resented their rule. The Mongols imposed heavy taxes on the Chinese population, which caused widespread poverty and discontent. Additionally, the Mongols were known for their military campaigns and their tendency to resort to violence, which caused instability and suffering within China.
Overall, it is difficult to say definitively whether Mongol rule was "good" or "bad" for China, as it had both positive and negative impacts. It is important to consider the context of the time and the various factors that contributed to the experience of Mongol rule in China.
Explanation:
It is difficult for me to provide an opinion on whether Mongol rule was good or bad for China without knowing more context about the specific chapter that you are referring to. Mongol rule in China, which began with the Yuan dynasty in the 13th century and lasted until the 14th century, had both positive and negative impacts on the country.
On the positive side, the Mongols introduced a number of administrative and institutional reforms that helped to centralize and stabilize the government. They also fostered cultural exchange and cooperation between China and other parts of the world.
On the negative side, the Mongols were harsh rulers who imposed heavy taxes and demanded tribute from the Chinese people. They also engaged in a number of military campaigns and conflicts, which caused destruction and loss of life. In addition, some historians argue that the Mongols disrupted the social and economic structure of China and contributed to a period of decline in the 14th century.
Without more specific information about the chapter that you are referring to, it is difficult to provide a more detailed analysis of the impact of Mongol rule on China.
To learn more about Mongol rule
brainly.com/question/11137573
Help.. As companies grew larger, workers formed national groups called ____ to help them bargain with owners more effectively.
It's unions
Explanation:
Google also said it was right.
what were the people's party's view on railroads?
What did Populists think about railroads?
It is not difficult to understand the antagonism between the Populists and the railroads in Kansas and the other states of the Western Plains. Their major complaint concerned freight rates. Kansas Populists claimed the rail rates farmers and shippers had to pay remained excessively high.
What aspects of Persia’s civilization allowed it to rise to power?
Answer:
The increased wealth and power of the empire allowed Darius to construct a brand new capital city, called Persepolis.
Explanation:
-The Achaemenid Persian Empire first expanded under the leadership of Cyrus the Great, who utilized a strategy of religious and cultural toleration to maintain order.
-Darius the Great further expanded the empire and introduced reforms such as standard currency and satraps—provincial governors—to rule over smaller regions of the empire on his behalf.
-The increased wealth and power of the empire allowed Darius to construct a brand new capital city, called Persepolis.
-The Achaemenid Empire fell when it was conquered by Alexander the Great.
John Cabot discovered what we now know as the East Coast of the United States in 1497 and claimed it for Great Britain, but they did not colonize the area for more than 100 years. Why was there such a long gap?
A. They didn’t want to settle there until they could bring slaves.
B. They were waiting to see if the Native Americans would leave the area.
C. They were too poor.
D. They were busy with dozens of other colonies.
Answer:
D. They were busy with dozens of other colonies.
Explanation:
The reason why it took more than 100 years for Great Britain to colonize the East Coast of the United States after John Cabot discovered it in 1497 is that colonization efforts began in the late 16th century with failed attempts by England to establish permanent colonies in the North.
It was not until the early 17th century that successful colonies were established in Virginia and Massachusetts.
I hope this helps
in the view of confucian historians, the last rulers of any dynastic cycle tended to be group of answer choices economically weak and militarily strong. economically secure yet morally culpable. politically weak and morally culpable. militarily weak and corrupt.
What is one significant way transportation changed in the United States in the first half of the nineteenth century?
A.
Canals were built, primarily in the North.
B.
Roads were built, primarily in the South.
C.
Railways were built, only in the North.
D.
Railways were built, only in the South.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
What is a reason time lines are organized chronologically?
to make them more visually interesting
to identify the importance of the events
to help determine the causes and effects of events
to provide an in-depth understanding of events
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Answer:
a
Explanation: it makes sense who wouldn't choose this answer if you dont choose this ill make you not a member of one of the cool kids >B)
Why is the philipines considered rich in natural resources
What economic strategies did maritime empires
use to increase their power, and how did the
developing empires affect political, economic,
religious, and cultural dynamics?
I need help ASAP!
Answer:
These maritime empires employed the economic strategy of mercantilism.
Explanation:
Mercantilism was the economic policy of running trade deficits with the colonies in order to accumulate stock of gold and silver. This policy made the empires wealthier at the expense of the colonies, although some of the colonies did benefit, for example, the North American Colonies.
According to economic analysis, the economic strategies maritime empires use to increase their power is "mercantilism."
Mercantilism is a form of an economic strategy that depends or focuses on the exportation of goods to draw more money.
Mercantilism as an economic strategy was famous around the 16th to 18th century and were used by major European powers like Great Britain.
On the other hand, the developing empires affect political, economic, religious, and cultural dynamics by forming alliances and conquering the old powers.
For example, Russo-Prussian Alliance in 1764 established power in Eastern Europe and Western Asia.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that mercantilism among developed nations and alliances among developing nations were common in the 16th to 18th centuries.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/97344
which anthropologist is most accurately categorized as a participant observer?
The anthropologist who is most accurately categorized as a participant observer is Bronislaw Malinowski
Participant observation is a method of data collection which is mostly used in ethnography and qualitative analysis. It gives the observer a chance to have a close and intimate understanding of a group of individuals and the chance to experience their involvement in their cultural community for a long period o time.
Bronislaw Malinowski was a well known anthropologist as well as ethnographer whose studies have been of utmost importance in the field of anthropology. His work in the field of anthropology, although influential, is also considered to be controversial.
Learn more about Participant observation here brainly.com/question/28475286
#SPJ4
when carranzo came to power, he wanted to unite the mexican people, and
The moment when Carranza reached the power, he aimed to unite the mexican people and establishing a stable republic in Mexico.
By focusing on strengthening the country's political and social structures, he sought to create a unified and prosperous nation, drawing on Mexico's rich history to inspire pride and unity among the diverse mexican people.
Basically, he aimed to unite the mexican people after years of turmoil and conflict. As the leader of the revolutionary movement, Carranza sought to establish a stable and democratic republic that would represent the interests of all mexicans.
He sought to reform the country's political and economic systems, and to create a more equitable society. His efforts to unite the country were rooted in his commitment to the principles of democracy, social justice, and the rule of law.
Despite facing numerous challenges and setbacks, Carranza's legacy as a champion of mexican history and the mexican people remains strong to this day.
Learn more about Mexico: https://brainly.com/question/19244059
#SPJ11
Why was Dr. Linus Pauling unpopular in some circles?
Dr. Pauling was unpopular due to his opinion on nuclear weapons testing.
Dr. Pauling was unpopular due to his work in antibiotics.
Dr. Pauling was unpopular due to his immigration status.
Dr. Pauling was unpopular due to his belief in mandatory vaccine inoculations.
Answer:
Dr. Linus Pauling won the Nobel Peace prize for his work in antibiotics.
Explanation:
Answer:
Dr. Pauling was unpopular due to his opinion on nuclear weapons testing.
Explanation:
Cut government spending on social programs and lowered income taxes
results
Answer:
WRONG
Explanation:
*Cut government spending on social programs and lowered stimulus payments*
As a result of the government using less money to buy products and services from the private sector, economic growth often slows. Tax increases often limit economic growth because they reduce people's disposable income, which leads to less expenditure on goods and services.
Government typically consists of three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, according to its wide associative meaning. Both a system for formulating policy and a means of enforcing organizational policies are government. A declaration of the governing ideas and economic growth philosophy is referred to as a constitution in many nations.
Although all organizations must have a system of governance, the term "government" is frequently used more precisely to refer to the roughly 200 distinct national governments and related institutions.
Learn more about government , from :
brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ2
Protests against the use of remote contour drones arose because
Protests against the use of remote contour drones arose because: they make it possible for politicians to launch military interventions.
DronesThe protesters were protesting because they were against the use of remote contour drones as this was because they felt that politician will tend to organize military interventions.
They believe that if the military intervention was launch it may tend to lead to people been casualty of the outcome of the military intervention which is why want the government to ban the use of drones.
Therefore Protests against the use of remote contour drones arose because: they make it possible for politicians to launch military interventions.
Learn more about Drones here:https://brainly.com/question/24530012
#SPJ1
Charles II of Spain was born in 1661 and was the last member of the Hapsburg royal family to rule Spain. Charles's family was composed of numerous first cousin marriages and uncle and niece marriages for many generations. In the previous hundred years before his birth, outbreeding in his ancestral line had almost entirely stopped. As a likely result, Charles suffered from many physical, mental, and emotional disorders. He could not talk until age four and did not walk until age eight. He also had an enlarged tongue that made chewing and talking difficult. Despite two marriages, Charles was likely infertile and produced no heirs.
The ancestry of Charles II of Spain is shown in the diagram.
Charles II of Spain was born in 1661 and was the last member of the Hapsburg royal family to rule Spain. Charles's family was composed of numerous first cousin marriages and uncle and niece marriages for many generations. In the previous hundred years before his birth, outbreeding in his ancestral line had almost entirely stopped. As a likely result, Charles suffered from many physical, mental, and emotional disorders. He could not talk until age four and did not walk until age eight. He also had an enlarged tongue that made chewing and talking difficult. Despite two marriages, Charles was likely infertile and produced no heirs.
The ancestry of Charles II of Spain is shown in the diagram.
Suppose the two original ancestors, the Castiles, are not inbred and are unrelated. The coefficients of inbreeding (COI) have been determined for all of the common ancestors in the table, ,FX, except for three.
X Ancestor FX n
A Philip of Castile 9.77×10−39.77×10−3 9, 10, 11
B Joanna of Castile 9.77×10−39.77×10−3 9, 10, 11
E Ferdinand I 1.07×10−21.07×10−2 8, 9
F Anna of Bohemia 1.07×10−21.07×10−2 8, 9
L Charles II of Austria 1.56×10−21.56×10−2 5
M Anne of Hapsburg 3.91×10−23.91×10−2 7
N Albert V 3.91×10−23.91×10−2 7
R Maria Anna of Bavaria U Philip III of Spain V Margarita of Austria Use the individual COI calculations to determine the COI for Charles II of Spain using three significant figures.
COI of Charles II of Spain:
Suppose the two original ancestors, the Castiles, are not inbred and are unrelated. The coefficients of inbreeding (COI) have been determined for all of the common ancestors in the table, ,FX, except for three.
X Ancestor FX n
A Philip of Castile 9.77×10−39.77×10−3 9, 10, 11
B Joanna of Castile 9.77×10−39.77×10−3 9, 10, 11
E Ferdinand I 1.07×10−21.07×10−2 8, 9
F Anna of Bohemia 1.07×10−21.07×10−2 8, 9
L Charles II of Austria 1.56×10−21.56×10−2 5
M Anne of Hapsburg 3.91×10−23.91×10−2 7
N Albert V 3.91×10−23.91×10−2 7
R Maria Anna of Bavaria U Philip III of Spain V Margarita of Austria Use the individual COI calculations to determine the COI for Charles II of Spain using three significant figures.
COI of Charles II of Spain:
The coefficient of inbreeding for Charles II of Spain is calculated as follows: The parents of Charles II of Spain are first cousins, which implies that the parents' COI is (9.77 × 10−3) × (9.77 × 10−3) = 9.54 × 10−5.The common ancestors' COIs are then added in pairs.
For example, the sum of the COIs of his grandparents Philip III of Spain and Margarita of Austria is 6.25 × 10−4 + 1.87 × 10−3 = 2.50 × 10−3. To get Charles II of Spain's COI, add the ancestor's COIs as follows:
COI Charles II = (9.54 × 10−5) + (9.54 × 10−5) + (1.07 × 10−2) + (1.07 × 10−2) + (1.56 × 10−2) + (3.91 × 10−2) + (3.91 × 10−2) + (2.50 × 10−3) = 0.254 or 2.54 × 10−1. Charles II of Spain's COI is 2.54 × 10^-1 or 0.254 (three significant figures).
Learn more about coefficient
https://brainly.com/question/1594145
#SPJ11
Commutative states that the grouping of three terms being added does not affect the result.
Distributive states that the order of two terms being added may be switched which does not affect the result.
Associative states that the multiplying a sum by a number is the same as multiplying each addend by that number and then adding the two products.
Which is which because that's what its asking
The addition of three words grouped together has no impact on the outcome.- associative property
Switching the sequence in which the two terms are added has no impact on the outcome.- commutative property
A sum is multiplied by a number in the same way that each addend is multiplied by the same number, and the two results are then added.- Distributive
Does the commutative property ensure that changing the group won't have an influence on the result?The commutative property states that while adding or multiplying, values may be exchanged or moved about, and the outcome will still be the same. Essentially, the sequence doesn't matter whether adding or multiplying.
The associative property states that no matter how the numbers are grouped or joined, the sum or outcome of an addition or multiplication of three or more numbers remains the same.The total or product is the same if two numbers are added or multiplied in a different order, according to the commutative property. The equation for the commutative property of addition is A + B = B + A.Following are some distributive characteristics of multiplication over addition: The results are added, and the sum is multiplied by the number. This is equivalent to multiplying each addend by the number.Learn more about associative property: https://brainly.com/question/28762453
#SPJ1
Before the Qin Dynasty, China was ___________ .
a.
organized into city/states
c.
divided into seven warring kingdoms
b.
unified under one ruler,
d.
ruled by warlords
Answer:
It's C: divided into seven warring kingdoms
Just took the test;)
Explain why the plague led to the rise of more powerful kings and nation-states by the 16th century.
The reason why the plague led to the rise of more powerful kings and nation-states by the 16th century was that the power of the Nobles and Lords were eroded.
How did the plague create modern nation states?Before the plague, Lords and Nobles exercised significant power over their lands and as such, the King did not have much power when it came to controlling them.
The plague however led to the deaths of the workforce of the Nobles and led to their power being eroded. As a result, they had to turn to the King for protection and which led to the Kings gaining more power and thereby creating modern nation-state.
Find out more on the effects of the plague at https://brainly.com/question/16066397
#SPJ1
Why were Europeans willing to free African nations from European rule after World
War II?
A) Europeans Felt that they had been unfair to those in Africa
B) your appearance rewarder Africans Africans for fighting for them during World War II
C) europeans no longer have the resources to control and roller colonies in Europe
D) europeans had taken everything they could from African colonies and had no use for them anymore
The moderate-sized government era is defined as the period from 1987 to 1999, true false
False, the moderate-sized government era is not defined as the period from 1987 to 1999.
The moderate-sized government era is not a widely recognized or defined period in political or historical terms. It is likely a term or concept specific to a particular context or perspective.
However, the time frame from 1987 to 1999 does not correspond to a universally acknowledged period referred to as the moderate-sized government era.
During this time period, various political and economic developments took place globally, and different countries experienced different trends and shifts in government policies.
It is important to note that the characterization of an era or period in terms of government size can vary based on different interpretations and definitions of what constitutes a moderate-sized government.
To provide a more accurate assessment, a specific country or region's context and historical events would need to be considered to determine any significant trends or changes in government size during the years from 1987 to 1999.
Learn more about era here:
https://brainly.com/question/19229833
#SPJ11
at the height of the war, france fielded an army of 10,000 troops in north america. T/F
Given statment "at the height of the war, france fielded an army of 10,000 troops in north america." is true. Because France fielded an army of approximately 10,000 troops in North America during the American Revolutionary War to support the American colonies in their fight against Britain.
During the American Revolutionary War, France did indeed field an army of approximately 10,000 troops in North America. After the American colonies declared independence from Britain in 1776, France saw an opportunity to weaken its long-standing rival and provide support to the revolutionaries. In 1778, France formally allied with the United States, and as part of this alliance, they committed military forces to aid the American cause.
The initial French contingent of 10,000 troops, commanded by General Jean-Baptiste Donatien de Vimeur, Comte de Rochambeau, arrived in Rhode Island in 1780.
This force, known as the Expédition Particulière, played a crucial role in the later stages of the war. They participated in notable engagements such as the Battle of Newport and the decisive Battle of Yorktown in 1781.
It is worth noting that the number of French troops in North America fluctuated during the war. Additionally, the 10,000 figure refers to the initial deployment and does not account for additional French forces, including naval support and auxiliary units, which were also deployed to the region.
Overall, France's military assistance proved pivotal in helping the American colonies secure their independence from Britain.
For similar questions on North America
https://brainly.com/question/25371670
#SPJ11
Why did more Europeans support Jewish immigration to Palestine after
World War II?
A. People around the world felt sympathy for the genocide the Jews
suffered during the war.
B. Arab states that opposed allowing Jews to live in Palestine had
fought against the Allies during the war.
C. Allied leaders wanted to reward Jewish soldiers for their combat
service during the war.
O D. European leaders hoped to force Jews to leave Europe for not
participating in the war.
Answer:
the answer is a hope that helps
Definition: A social, economic, and political system based on loyalty and military service.
1 meritocracy
2 aristocracy
3 feudalism
4 democracy