Answers
Answer:
Rip-
Answer is FALSEEEEE
Explanation:
wanna know why- CuSe
Compound subjects can be singular, plural, or a mix of both: TWO SINGULAR: The dog and the cat bother me. ... A compound subject whose parts are joined by and usually takes a plural verb regardless of whether those parts are plural or singular: TWO SINGULAR: The dog and the cat bother me.
So there u go-
Hope this Helps
Compound subjects are made up of two or more nouns or pronouns that act as the subject of a sentence. Thus, it is true.
What are compound subjects?Compound subjects are formed by joining two or more nouns, pronouns, or noun phrases together, and they function as the subject of a sentence. The individual nouns or pronouns in the compound subject are often joined by coordinating conjunctions, such as "and," "or," or "but." For example:
My sister and I are going to the beach.The dog and the cat are sleeping on the couch.It's important to note that compound subjects are always considered plural, even if the individual nouns or pronouns are singular. This means that the verb that follows a compound subject must also be plural to match the subject. Thus, the given sentence is true.
Learn more about compound subjects, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11875057
#SPJ7
Related Questions
what are some words that describe BETSY from the book lyddie
Answers
Answer: Betsy is a reader. She is ambitious. She teaches Lyddie to read, starting with reading "Oliver Twist", to her.
Explanation: I read the book.
Read the excerpt from Mandela’s Inaugural Address.
Never, never and never again shall it be that this beautiful land will again experience the oppression of one by another and suffer the indignity of being the skunk of the world.
The sun shall never set on so glorious a human achievement.
Let freedom reign.
God bless Africa!
Who is his primary audience here?
A.
world and African diplomats
B.
all Africans
C.
world leaders
D.
South Africans
E.
world nations
Answers
Answer:
i think it's D
Explanation:
i hope it's helpssss
i need help please? and i’m timed
Answers
Answer:
3
Explanation:
because tornado alley came from where tornadoes strike the most
What future even does this passage foreshadow?
MACBETH, aside. The Prince of Cumberland! that is a step On which I must fall down, or else o'erleap, For in my way it lies. Stars, hide your fires;
Let not light see my black and deep desires:
The eye wink at the hand; yet let that be, Which the eye fears, when it is done, to see.
A. The King killing Macbeth.
B. Macbeth killing Malcom.
C. Macbeth killing the king.
D. Macbeth becoming Prince of Cumberland.
Answers
This passage from Shakespeare's play Macbeth foreshadows the future event of Macbeth killing the king. Macbeth's reference to the Prince of Cumberland (Malcolm) indicates that he sees Malcolm as an obstacle in his path to power. The phrase "on which I must fall down, or else o'erleap" suggests that Macbeth is contemplating the need to overcome this obstacle, even if it means committing a terrible act. So the right option is (C) Macbeth killing the king.
When Macbeth says "Stars, hide your fires; Let not light see my black and deep desires," he is asking the stars to conceal his dark thoughts and ambitions.
This implies that Macbeth is aware of the gravity of his potential actions and wishes to keep them hidden from others and himself. The line "The eye wink at the hand; yet let that be, Which the eye fears, when it is done, to see" further demonstrates Macbeth's internal conflict, as he recognizes the potential consequences of his actions but is still drawn towards committing them.
In summary, this passage foreshadows Macbeth's decision to kill the king, revealing his deep-seated ambitions and the internal struggle he faces as he contemplates committing regicide.
For more questions on: Shakespeare's
https://brainly.com/question/7592021
#SPJ8
The trial of Peter Zenger is widely credited with being the first example of American freedom of __________, even though the American nation did not yet exist.
A.
press
B.
speech
C.
religion
D.
assembly and petition
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Peter Zenger's trial is widely credited with being the first example of American freedom of the press and speech, even though the American nation did not yet exist. So, the correct options are (A) and (B).
What is Speech?Speech is defined as human vocal communication using language. Each language uses phonetic combinations of vowel and consonant sounds that make up the sounds of its words, and uses those words as words in their semantic character.
Speed is the faculty of verbal Communication which is the ability to express her thoughts and feelings by speech sounds and gestures. By losing her speech made her feel isolated from humanity.
Thus, Peter Zenger's trial is widely credited with being the first example of American freedom of the press and speech, even though the American nation did not yet exist. So, the correct options are (A) and (B).
Learn more about Speech, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29586134
#SPJ2
1. 'We often hear that Americans are strongly divided and can find no middle
ground. It seems we are split right in half and there is no majority agreement
on anything. But is that really true? A 2018 study revealed that a clear majority
of Americans agree that the minimum wage should be raised to $15 an hour. "In
addition, nearly 80 percent of Americans believe that our government cannot be
trusted, and that figure includes both Democrats and Republicans. "Also, nine
out of ten Americans recognize that there are forms of inequality in our country
and that inequality needs to be addressed. Finally, a whopping 100 percent of
respondents do not want their tax dollars wasted, but they believe that taxes are
wasted all the time.
A. Democrats and Republicans will always have strongly opposing views.
B. A clear majority of Americans agree that the minimum wage should be
raised.
C. Inequality in our country remains a pressing issue.
D. Americans are probably in agreement on far more things than we're led
to believe.
Answers
Based on the information provided in the statement, we can make the following conclusions:
A. The statement does not provide specific information about whether Democrats and Republicans will always have strongly opposing views. It only states that nearly 80 percent of Americans believe that the government cannot be trusted, which includes both Democrats and Republicans. Therefore, we cannot determine if Democrats and Republicans will always have strongly opposing views based on the given information.
B. The statement mentions that a clear majority of Americans agree that the minimum wage should be raised to $15 an hour. Therefore, we can conclude that a clear majority of Americans do agree that the minimum wage should be raised.
C. The statement indicates that nine out of ten Americans recognize that there are forms of inequality in the country and that inequality needs to be addressed. This suggests that inequality in the country remains a pressing issue.
D. The statement suggests that Americans are probably in agreement on far more things than what is often portrayed. It mentions that a clear majority of Americans agree on raising the minimum wage, that a significant percentage believe the government cannot be trusted, and that the recognition of inequality is widespread. This implies that there is a level of agreement on these issues among Americans.
Based on the given information, we can conclude that options B, C, and D are supported by the statement.
To learn more about Democrats visit:
brainly.com/question/14320124
1. While they were gone to the grocery store. A) fragment b) correct
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
There has to be a continuation transitioning.
COMPLETE ANSWER
THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IS I'M GOING TO VOTE BRAINLIEST
Direction: Read each situations and Answer the questions
ASAP plsss
Answers
After each situation, a communication strategy will be provided in response to the questions that follow. Paolo began studying Japanese in order to get ready for the job in Japan.
Even though everyone speaks English, it is still important to acquire another language since, even though Paolo's employees speak Japanese, they are more comfortable and familiar with him because they speak their own tongue. Disregarding the native language and customs of the country you are visiting is unfriendly.
Professional communication among these employees has an impact on the workplace, and people may show up to work the following day groggy from lack of sleep. Positively, everyone will perceive their intuition growing.
To know more about Communication visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28347989
#SPJ9
Compare and contrast the topics and themes of writers from the Americas and European writers. Include specific examples to support your statements.
[Prompt A wants you to identify a common theme, tone, or use of some other literary device in the stories or poems from Units 1 & 2 and those in Unit 4. Once you identify a common trait of two or more selections (one from Unit 4 and the other from Unit 1 or 2), quote from BOTH selections to prove your point.]
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
In order to compare European and American authors, you need to choose a particular time period or literary movement. For example, we can look at the Romantics. In Europe, the Romantic writers include Percy Bysshe Shelley, Mary Shelley, Lord Byron, Samuel Taylor Coleridge and John Keats, among others. These authors focused on the "emotional" aspects of humans that they believed had been overlooked by the Enlightenment. They were interested in the abstract, the irrational and the magical. They also talked about the beauty of nature and the negative aspects of society.
The Romantics in America shared some of these topics. They were also interested in the value of the superstitious, the abstract and the emotional in life. They highlighted the value of nature as well. However, their views of nature were shaped by the landscapes of America, and the idea of vastness and exploration. The movement, just like the one in Europe, gave precedence to the individual above the social and gave rise to the Transcendentalist movement.
European writers focused on a long history while American writers focused on the new and inhibited cultural and political landscape.
Your question is incomplete as you didn't provide the stories and poems. Therefore I'll explain accordingly. American literature was marked by two significant moments. They're modernism and post-modernism. Modernism simply means the avant-garde style that was witnessed in the early twentieth century. Post-modernism evolved after the Second World War.
The major themes in American literature include transformation, alienation, and the relativity of truth. It should be noted that the themes show the aesthetic movements of both modernism and post-modernism.
The major themes in European literature include respectability, utilitarianism, earnestness, and a strong emphasis on duty. Some of the major ideas of European literature include the glorification of war, economic prosperity, expansion of empires, etc.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/18358516
late for class. (always / Paul / be)
Answers
Answer:
always late for class.
May be it is use ful
Is this a weak or strong thesis statement and explain why.
2. Despite many positive steps toward gender equality, women's sports are still treated
unfairly by mainstream media.
3. Because many children’s toys have potential safety hazards, it’s clear many toys are unsafe.
4. My experience with young children has taught me that I want to be a disciplinary parent because I believe that a child without discipline can be a parent’s worst nightmare.
5. The book has many themes and symbols.
6. I believe domestic abuse is harmed and should not be done.
Answers
2. This is a strong thesis statement because it clearly states the main argument of the essay and provides a clear focus for the reader. The statement is specific, debatable, and supported by evidence, which makes it an effective guide for the rest of the essay.
3. This is a weak thesis statement because it is too general and does not provide a clear argument or focus for the essay. The statement is also not debatable, as it is a widely accepted fact that some toys can be unsafe.
4. This is a weak thesis statement because it is based solely on the writer's personal experience and does not provide a clear argument or focus for the essay. The statement is also not debatable, as it is a personal opinion that may not be shared by all readers.
5. This is a weak thesis statement because it is too general and does not provide a clear argument or focus for the essay. The statement is also not debatable, as it is a statement of fact that does not require further analysis or discussion.
6. This is a weak thesis statement because it is too general and does not provide a clear argument or focus for the essay. The statement is also not debatable, as it is a widely accepted fact that domestic abuse is harmful and should not be done.
What does it mean to oncoming traffic sign? In driving
Answers
Which reason best explains why the author includes dialogue in the book?
O It allows him to show people's characters.
O It allows other people to describe the places the author sees.
O It makes the book seem more like a novel.
It makes the trip sound more interesting than it actually is.
Answers
The reason that best explains why the author includes dialogue in the book is it allows him to show people's characters, hence option A is correct.
Dialogue is a powerful tool that a smart writer may employ to move the plot of a novel forward, bringing the reader closer to its climax and, ultimately, its conclusion.
Additionally, language may heighten the drama of a scene by developing character conflict or building suspense prior to a crucial development or turning point in the plot.
Enhancing understanding, resolving problems, and challenging ideas and behaviors are the main goals of dialogue. Heart and mind are both involved.
Learn more about dialogue, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1566561
#SPJ1
I need help with this one! Please
Answers
B) off
C) on
D) up
E) over
F) after
G) back
H) up
I) up
J) off
Hope this helps!
Which statement best evaluates whether the narrative has a clearly defined
focus?
The days were getting shorter, and the air felt cooler already. Ginger
wondered if she would have time to finish her report during study hall.
Just then, Shawn and Noah walked by and waved. She was probably
the only one who remembered the day Shawn had accidentally locked
himself out of his house. Why couldn't people be nicer?
A. The narrative has a clearly defined focus on the difficulties of
junior high school
B. The narrative has a clearly defined focus on the changes that
come in the fall.
O C. The narrative has a clearly defined focus on Shawn and Noah's
friendship
D. The narrative does not have a clearly defined focus
Answers
Answer:pretty sure its b
Explanation:a p e x
Read the excerpt from "Flood."
Under the malicious glints of the clouds
the Kitakami, grown twice in width, perhaps ten times in
volume,
bears yellow waves.
All the iron barges are being tugged to the army camp.
A motorboat sputters.
The water flowing back from downstream
has already turne into marshes
the paddies on the dried riverbed,
hidden the bean fields,
and devastated half the mulberries.
Which literary device does the poet use in this excerpt?
A hyperbole
B irony
C meter
D personification
Part B:
Which example from the excerpt best provides support for the
answer to Part A?
A Under the malicious glints of the clouds
B the Kitakami, grown twice in width, perhaps ten times in volume
C All the iron barges are being tugged to the army camp.
D The water flowing back from downstream
Answers
The correct answer for both the question is Option D. The literary device that the poet uses in the excerpt is Option D. personification. The given excerpt is from the poem "Flood" by Kazuko Shiraishi. This example supports the answer to Part A is Option D. The water flowing back from downstream
Kazuko Shiraishi, born in Vancouver in 1931, is a Japanese poet who started writing poems at the age of twenty.
Her poetry is known for its vivid imagery, use of colloquial language, and its focus on the emotional lives of ordinary people.
In the given excerpt, the river Kitakami is personified.
The river is given human-like qualities such as growing twice in width, ten times in volume and bearing yellow waves.
Hence, the correct answer is option D (personification).
Part B:The example from the excerpt that best provides support for the answer to Part A is: The water flowing back from downstream has already turned into marshes the paddies on the dried riverbed, hidden the bean fields, and devastated half the mulberries.
This example supports the answer to Part A as it is another instance of personification.
The water flowing back from downstream is given human-like qualities of hiding, turning, and devastating.
Hence, option D (The water flowing back from downstream) is the correct answer.
For more questions on Flood
https://brainly.com/question/24670927
#SPJ8
Read this excerpt from "Birdfoot's Grampa."
But, leathery hands full
of wet brown life,
knee deep in the summer
roadside grass,
he just smiled and said
they have places to go to
too
Based on the excerpt, what will readers most likely infer about Grampa?
He is accepting of his grandson's ignorance.
He is irritated by his grandson's impatience.
He believes he will not be able to save all the toads.
He believes his grandson should not talk back.
Answers
Answer:
i think it might be B ???
Explanation:
Answer: A on edge 2020
Explanation:
2 facts about the sun
Answers
2. Sun is 140 miliion km away from Earth.
2. DISCUSS: Could you ever imagine characters like Tom and Daisy Buchanan relinquishing the advantages that come with their wealth? Why or why not?
Answers
While Gatsby made his money by selling illegal booze and hosting lavish parties with it, Tom and Daisy were well educated and wealthy. In contrast to Daisy and Tom, he stands for new money.
What is money?A trading product that is often used as a medium for economic communication is money. It serves as the medium for expressing values and pricing. It is the debt measure of wealth and travels from person to person and country to country through trade. In written transactions involving the exchange of products and divine services from one person to another, money is any good that is frequently used and acknowledged.
The characters in The Great Gatsby reflect the wealthiest people in 1920s New York society. They are not represented as being very ambitious despite their wealth, though. Instead, the wastefulness, hedonism, and irresponsibility of the wealthy folks are exposed.
Therefore, Educated and wealthy. In contrast to Daisy and Tom, he stands for new money.
Learn more about money here:
https://brainly.com/question/22984856
#SPJ1
I turn the lights off before I go to bed:
A. past tense
B. present tense
C. future tense
Answers
Answer:
B. Present
Explanation:
Because past woulda said “I turned off the lights” and future would say “I will turn off the lights” And it makes sense because saying it like “I turn the Lights off before I go to bed” means it’s still a thing she does every day so it happenes currently (same thing as present)
How can life events change how we see things?
Answers
Answer:
If we perceive negativity, then things are going to be negative. If we perceive happiness, then our life is going to be happier. ... We change the way we see these events and make them more positive experiences.
Explanation:
Answer:
Life events could change how we see things because when you experience something or look in another perspective it can enlighten you to see a new side of a conversation or viewpoint. It can show you the true colors of something or it can teach you an ongoing life lesson.
Explanation:
She listened to the crunch of their boots, their breathing, and the drumming of a distant woodpecker. And the crackling. In winter the woods crackled as if everything were straining, ready to snap like dried chicken bones.
Answers
Answer: sooo how can I help??
Explanation:
Write a narrative story of natural disaster
Answers
Answer:
I think you may have to do that on your own
Try doing on on a thunderstorm though
Which of the following sentences adheres to the rules of parallelism for items
in a series?
OA. The mailman delivered apples, bananas, and coconuts.
B. The mailman delivered apples, ate bananas, and some coconuts.
C. The mailman delivered the apples, some bananas and half-eaten
coconuts.
OD. The mailman delivered the apples, bananas, and the coconuts.
Answers
The one that follows the rules of parallelism is "The mailman delivered apples, bananas, and coconuts."
In order to emphasize related concepts in a sentence, parallelism is the use of comparable words, clauses, phrases, sentence structure, or other grammatical characteristics. Particularly in series, pairs, and items in an outline or list, parallel structuring is crucial.Parallelism in language, also known as parallel structure or parallel construction, is the juxtaposition of comparable words or clauses with the same grammar rules within one or more sentences. The use of parallelism has an impact on readability and might make writings simpler to comprehend.Verify that you have matched nouns with nouns, verbs with verbs. Because this is a simple way to check for parallelism in your work, use prepositional phrases with prepositional phrases, and so on. Check that each element in a sentence that is underlined utilizes the same grammatical structure.Thus the correct answer is A.
Refer here to learn more about parallelism: https://brainly.com/question/1466033
#SPJ9
"Rebuttal" Would you kill one person to save five?
Answers
Rebuttal would still be ethically and legally accountable for taking that individual's life if you killed one person to save thousands of others. You are not accountable for the thousands of lives lost because you decided not to kill that one guy, who then went on to kill thousands more.
The trolley must be redirected onto a track with only one person on it in order to spare the lives of the five workers. This one worker will perish if Adam steers the trolley onto a different track, but the other five workers will be rescued. The story's guiding principle—killing one person to save 500 others—is that we cannot just tolerate wrongdoing by others.
To learn more about Rebuttal, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/16948179
#SPJ1
Identify the noun or pronoun that the predicate adjective in the following sentence modifies. The chimps in the largest cage at the zoo were playful. A. chimps B. cage C. There is no predicate adjective D. zoo
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
the world "Playful" is talking about the chimps! Another way to understand is to shorten it to "the chimps were playful". Hope this helps!
Help its for today! How did Maria from West Side Story demonstrate the original meaning of love through her words and actions?
What impact did falling in love have on this person or character?
What did this person or character take away from the experience in the excerpt?
Answers
Answer:
Maria from West Side Story demonstrated the original meaning of love through her words and actions by showing compassion, understanding and forgiveness.Falling in love had a profound impact on Maria from West Side Story. It made her feel alive, but also made her realize the harsh realities of the world around her.
Explanation:
which name can be used to name a female reproductive system and the wording starting with letter "f"
Answers
The female reproductive system can be referred to as the "fallopian tubes." It can also be referred to as "female reproductive tract" or "female genital tract."
What is the fallopian tube?The fallopian tubes are a part of the female reproductive system and are named after the Italian anatomist Gabriele Falloppio, who first described them in the 16th century. The fallopian tubes connect the ovaries to the uterus and provide a path for the egg to travel from the ovary to the uterus where it can be fertilized by sperm. It is a vital organ involved in the process of child conception.
Find more useful information on the fallopian tube here;
https://brainly.com/question/10953249
#SPJ1
3. What's interesting about the date of the final
battle?
Julius Caesar’s act 5 sc 1
Answers
1. What assumptions does Davenport make about Taylor's interference that turn out to be
wrong? How does this make you feel about Taylor?
P
Answers
Taylor's gets into an argument with Spike due to Adam's interference, but Chase goes to clear up the misunderstanding.
Who was Taylor Krane?Taylor Krane is Victor Krane's former main bionic soldier and the Season 3 secondary antagonist. When she videotaped the Lab Rats performing a mission and put it online, she disclosed their bionic secret.
She was controlled by Krane's Triton App and hence was not bad on purpose. Until One of Us, she was Leo's second archenemy. In Rise of the Secret Soldiers, she was vanquished by Leo, although she escaped her claimed death.
Victor Krane genetically developed Taylor and at least 99 other bionic warriors without the knowledge of Douglas Davenport. Taylor gets into a confrontation with Spike as a result of Adam's intervention, but Chase goes to straighten things up.
Learn more about Taylor Krane here:
https://brainly.com/question/11528177
#SPJ1