Answers
The Alien and Sedition Acts are a set of laws or a collection of laws. The federalist congress passed these measures as additional legislation in the year 1798. The set of legislation covers both immigrants' and non-immigrants' rights.
The Sedition Act forbade the publication of slanderous or vicious writings against the Federalist-dominated government, while the Naturalization Act doubled the residency requirement for U.S. citizenship from five to fourteen years.
While the Alien Friends Act allowed the government to deport any non-citizen accused of plotting against the government, the Alien Enemies Act enabled the Adams' government to arrest and deport any male nationals of the enemy country in the case of war.
Prior to the Sedition Act's passage, the minority Republicans in Congress opposed the measures on the grounds that they went against the First Amendment, which protected freedom of the press and speech.
As an answer to the Sedition and Alien Acts, Jefferson had the brilliant notion of persuading sympathetic state legislatures to pass resolutions. They were a forerunner in defending the protection of civil liberties provided by the Constitution, particularly freedom of the press and of expression.
Virginia and Kentucky issued Resolutions in 1798 in response to the Sedition and Alien Acts. Because they feared being arrested, the future presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison wrote the resolutions in secret, denouncing the Alien and Sedition Acts as unlawful and asserting that because they exceeded the federal government's constitutional jurisdiction, they were void.
To know more about Alien Enemies Act
brainly.com/question/20576564
#SPJ4
Related Questions
20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties
Answers
The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.
Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.
On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.
While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.
To know more about obligations.
https://brainly.com/question/32907342
#SPJ11
For each scenario, determine whether or not government intervention will improve society's well-being.
Government intervention will improve society's well-being. (1)
Government intervention will not improve society's well-being.(2)
Answers
For each scenario ,
(1). Local energy companies release pollutants into local reservoirs.
(2). Consumers are beginning to demand more smartphones than traditional mobile phones.
Government intervention has many advantages. For those who support government intervention in the economy, they define the following benefits. Provides consumers with more security when choosing products.
Governments effectively deprive workers of the fruits of their labor through taxes in order to subsidize others doing unproductive work, possibly at higher rates of return. Government programs are sometimes accused of disrupting the functioning of market economies.
To know more about society's well-being visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30301903
#SPJ4
Give example in us history when executive government policy contradicts health policy
Answers
Answer:The Supreme Court could also vote to overturn an order. Executive orders can adjust how existing healthcare laws are followed. For example, the ACA has an open enrollment period every year where people are allowed to sign up for new plans. With an executive order, the President could lengthen or shorten the open enrollment period.
Explanation:
Please answer all the questions below. Explain your answer detail; please write at least 200 words.
If you were a judge, would you rather work in a trial court or an appellate court? Why? In your answer, be sure to explain the differences between the two types of courts.
If you were a judge, would you be an activist or a strict constructionist? Why?
Which theory of judicial philosophy the judges below seem to follow.
John Rapanos, a real estate developer, sought to fill in a wetland on his property in Michigan in order to build a condominium. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality refused him permission to do so, saying that the area was a protected wetland under the Clean Water Act. Under the Clean Water Act, the government is allowed to regulate pollution into any "navigable water." Rapanos argued that the site for the condominium was separated by a four-foot-wide earthen barrier from a ditch that emptied into another ditch that ultimately emptied into Lake St. Clair, a navigable water. The government argued that under regulations issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, wetlands are covered by the Clean Water Act as long as they are adjacent to traditionally navigable waters. On appeal, the judges decided that the word "navigable" in the Clean Water Act means that only water with a continuous surface connection with a water of the United States can be regulated, not water with occasional or intermittent flows into navigable waters.
Answers
If I were a judge, I would prefer to work in an appellate court.
As a judge, I would choose to work in an appellate court rather than a trial court. The primary reason for this preference is the nature of the cases handled in each court and the corresponding judicial role. Trial courts are the initial level of courts where cases are first heard, evidence is presented, and facts are determined. Judges in trial courts are responsible for overseeing the proceedings, ruling on objections, and instructing the jury. While trial courts provide an opportunity to directly interact with witnesses and evaluate evidence, they often involve a high volume of cases, requiring judges to work under significant time pressure.
On the other hand, appellate courts handle appeals from trial courts, focusing on reviewing the decisions made in lower courts. Appellate judges primarily analyze legal arguments, review records of the lower court proceedings, and interpret the law. This role allows for a deeper engagement with legal principles and the opportunity to shape legal precedents. Additionally, appellate courts generally have a smaller caseload, enabling judges to spend more time on each case and engage in more thoughtful deliberations.
Working in an appellate court would provide me with the opportunity to contribute to the development of the law, clarify legal principles, and ensure consistency in judicial decisions. It would also allow for a more comprehensive analysis of legal issues, fostering intellectual stimulation and a greater impact on the legal system as a whole.
Learn more about appellate court
brainly.com/question/30962544
#SPJ11
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Answers
A small amount of alcohol leaves the body through the skin, in the breath and in urine.
The amount of alcohol in the blood at any time varies depending on the amount, the strength and how quickly the alcohol is consumed. Individual factors also contribute, such as body type, age, gender and how well the liver can break down alcohol to use for energy.
does anyone know who is ronaldo the judge is asking
Answers
Answer: #\(Game On\)
Explanation:
Cristiano Ronaldo
2.These are the requirements ratification choose the one that’s a false requirement for ratification. Select one: a. The purported agency must be revealed to the third at time for transition b. The third party must believe that the person with who they are dealing has authority to act for another c. The agent must have intended to act on behalf of the principal d. The principal must not be competent to enter the contract at the time it was made.
Answers
One of the following is the bogus ratification requirement is at the time the contract was made, the principal had to be ineligible to enter into it.
Requirement for ratification.The principle must have been competent or legally able to enter into the agreement at the time it was made in order for it to be ratified. Ratification usually takes place when the principal confirms or validates a contract that was first signed by an unlicensed agent.
The other choices mentioned - disclosing the agency, the third party believing the agent has the right to act on behalf of the principal, and the agent's purpose to act in that capacity are also acceptable conditions for ratification.
Learn more on requirement for ratification here: https://brainly.com/question/26016935
#SPJ1
How does collateral affect the interest rate on a bond
Answers
The presence of collateral can affect the interest rate on a bond in the following ways:
1. Collateral can lower the interest rate on a bond: When collateral is provided, the risk associated with the bond decreases. This means that the investor's investment is secured by the collateral in the event that the issuer defaults on the bond. This reduction in risk may lead to a lower interest rate on the bond.
2. Collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: On the other hand, if the collateral is of low quality, it may not be as valuable in the event of a default. In this case, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.
3. No collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: When there is no collateral backing a bond, the bond is considered to be unsecured. This means that the investor's investment is not secured by any assets.
As a result, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.
Give an example of a case whereby you have experienced that the law was able to contribute to a peaceful and harmonious community
Answers
Laws are set rules that guides against bad act and individual who does such will be punished.
What is law?Law are set of rules that guides an individual act or behavior.
In a community or country laws are given to guide and regulate the way we conduct ourselves, for order and justice.
In case of indiscriminate killing,there are set rules that guides against such act and individual who does such will be punished.
Therefore, laws are set rules that guides against bad act and individual who does such will be punished.
Learn more on Law here,
https://brainly.com/question/186782
a person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when?
Answers
A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when in a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Unless the truck has been modified with safety belt restraints, no one under the age of 18 is allowed to ride in the bed. The driver must be able to communicate with the passengers in a pickup truck camper. It must be possible to open the camper exit from both inside and outside. Seat belts and safety glass in windows are necessities.
California law prohibits riding in a truck's bed unless one of the following conditions is met: You are secured in the truck's bed using a restraint system that has received federal approval. When in a seat that is properly buckled up and wearing an authorized safety belt, a person is permitted to ride in the back of a pickup truck.
Learn more about federal approval at:
brainly.com/question/632349
#SPJ4
Is it legal to go to someone’s house to peaceful confront them about a scam?
Answers
Depends on what they were scamming people with
Ruelito Cruz and his wife contracted a package tour with Sun Holidays, In.c The latter owns and operates Beach Island Resort and a boat named M/B Coco Beach III for their guests. The package tour includes the transportation of the couples from Port of Batangas to Beach Island Resort in Puerto Galera and vice versa. The couple stayed in the said resort from September 9 to 11, 2000. On September 11,2000, as it was still windy, Ruelito and his wife boarded the boat (M/B Coco Beach III) of Sun Holidays to ferry them back to Batangas. Shortly after the boat sailed, it started to rain. As it moved farther away from Puerto Galera and into the open seas, the rain and wind got stronger causing the boat to tilt side to side. The waves got more unwieldy. After getting hit by two big waves which came one after the other, M/B Coco Beach III capsized putting all passengers including the Ruelito and his wife underwater. As a consequence, 8 passengers died including Ruelito and his wife. The parents of Ruelito filed a case against Sun Holidays Inc., for damages and breach of contract of common carriage. Sun Holidays denied that it is not common carrier, it raises the defense that while they own a boat, the same is not available to the general public but only for their Resort guests and crew members.Issue: Is Sun Holidays Inc. a common carrier?What is your legal Opinion? Prove your answer.
Answers
Answer:
answer is
Explanation:
Briefly describe what Marks says in the beginning of his talk about conflict and compromise.
Answers
Answer: Marks States We are constantly told that conflict is bad that compromise is good; that conflict is bad but the consensus is good; that conflict is bad and collaboration is good. But in my view, that's far too simple a vision of the world. We cannot know whether conflict is bad unless we know who is fighting, why they are fighting ,and how they are fighting. And compromises can be thoroughly rotten if they harm people who are not at the table, people who are vulnerable, disempowered, people whom we have an obligation to protect.
Explanation:
If I was a reporter in the country of Washington D.C and the President sent the Secret Service and they told me that I cannot report anything about the president anymore. What amendment is the government infringing on (what amendment protects me from that)?
Answers
Answer:
The First Amendment
Explanation:
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment state that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Thus, Freedom of the PRESS is part of the United States First Amendment, that protects the right of individuals to acquire and disseminate data or viewpoints without government censorship or concern of penalty.
Hence, in this case, the amendment the government is infringing on is THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates _____.
Answers
Answer:
Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates improves the chances of being released from prison.
an executive order is a binding directive issued by the president, within areas in which the president has constitutional authority, to members of the executive branch and private citizens or groups.
Answers
An executive order is a directive given by the president of the United States that governs how the federal government functions. Several sources provide the constitutional or legal justification for presidential directives.
An executive order is defined as.
A federal official or administrative agency may be directed by an executive order issued by the president of the United States, acting in his capacity as head of the executive branch, to follow a certain course of action or desist from following a specific course of action.
What is the term for a presidential directive that has legal force?
Principal Content Presidential Directives, a specific type of Executive Order that has the same legal standing as a law and specifies obligations for the Executive Branch, are used to set the Executive Branch's national security policy.
What is the name of a presidential order that functions as a law but is not approved by Congress yet has the same legal effect?
Executive orders do not require approval from Congress because they are not laws. In our current system of government, an executive order is one of the most often utilized "presidential" documents. Every American president has issued at least one since George Washington took office in 1789, with the total number (as of this writing) topping 13,731.
To learn more about George Washington please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14598321
#SPJ4
What possible legal defense(s) could they use for criminal charges related to the burglary?
Answers
Answer:
What possible legal defense(s) could they use for criminal charges related to the burglary?
Explanation:
the ucc requires that the mirror image rule be followed for all acceptances. T/F
Answers
False. The statement is not entirely accurate. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) does not explicitly require the mirror image rule to be followed for all acceptances.
The mirror image rule states that an acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer exactly for a valid contract to be formed.
However, the UCC provides certain exceptions and modifications to the mirror image rule in commercial transactions. Under the UCC, an acceptance with additional or different terms can still create a valid contract, unless the acceptance is expressly made conditional on the offeror's assent to the additional or different terms. Therefore, the UCC allows for some flexibility in the acceptance process beyond the strict application of the mirror image rule.
To know more about the Uniform Commercial Code visit:
brainly.com/question/30869012
#SPJ11
If the federal government receives $3 trillion in tax revenue over the course of one year but spends only $2 trillion, it means the government has a ______________ for the year
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
If the federal government receives $3 trillion in tax revenue over the course of one year but spends only $2 trillion, it means the government has a budget surplus for the year. A budget surplus occurs when the government's revenue exceeds its expenses, which can be used to pay down debt, invest in infrastructure or public services, or returned to taxpayers through tax cuts or rebates.
Any help with the beach movie question
Answers
Answer:
they are just set there
Explanation:
Which statement best describes a difference between a democracy and a republic?
Answers
................................................................................................................................UNKNOWN....................................................................I'M A SPY.................................................................................
Answers
The State Administrator is permitted to do all of the following EXCEPT: A withhold registration of a security B arrest an individual for violating State law C request that the state Attorney General file criminal charges against an individual for willfully violating State law
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The State Administrator is permitted to do all of the following EXCEPT: A withhold registration of a security B arrest an individual for violating State law C request that the state Attorney General file criminal charges against an individual for willfully violating State law
if a non-attorney party to a contract unintentionally misrepresents the law, the other party may rescind the contract. a. true b. false
Answers
The statement is false. If a non-attorney party unintentionally misrepresents the law in a contract, the other party generally cannot rescind the contract solely on that basis.
The misrepresentation of the law by a non-attorney is not typically considered a valid ground for contract rescission.In contract law, misrepresentation refers to a false statement of fact made by one party to induce the other party to enter into the contract. While misrepresentation of law can be a valid ground for rescission if the misrepresentation is made by an attorney or someone in a professional legal capacity, the same does not apply to non-attorney parties.
Generally, the principle of "caveat emptor" or "buyer beware" applies, meaning it is the responsibility of each party to understand and be aware of the legal consequences of the contract they enter into. Unless there are other grounds for rescission, such as fraud or mutual mistake, unintentional misrepresentation of the law by a non-attorney party would not typically provide a basis for contract rescission.
Learn more about attorney here : brainly.com/question/32172311
#SPJ11
1. What is a Perimeter?
Answers
the distance around the edge of a shape
After speaking with a foreclosure prevention credit counselor, a homeowner believes her MLO failed to ensure she can afford her mortgage payment. What are her legal options based on the Ability to Repay rule?
Answers
The Ability to Repay rule is a key aspect of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that requires mortgage lenders to assess a borrower's ability to repay a loan before making it.
The rule was established to prevent predatory lending practices and help ensure that borrowers don't end up with unaffordable loans.According to the Ability to Repay rule, a mortgage lender must consider specific factors when determining a borrower's ability to repay a loan. These factors include a borrower's current or reasonably expected income or assets, employment status, credit history, and monthly payments on the mortgage.
Mortgage lenders must also calculate the borrower's debt-to-income (DTI) ratio to ensure that it doesn't exceed 43%.If a borrower believes that their mortgage loan officer (MLO) failed to ensure they could afford their mortgage payment, they may have legal options.
To know more about assets visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14392032
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
A school in your neighborhood has stopped conducting music classes for its students. According to institutional anomie theory, which reason is
behind the school's action?
OA. The school did not have enough funds to operate.
OB The school could not find a good music teacher.
Ос.
The school diverted funds to prepare students for good jobs.
OD
The school considers music as a distraction.
Answers
The reason for the school's action was a lack of operating money to institutional anomie theory.
The institutional anomie theory was developed by who?Messner and Rosenfeld put forth the institutional anomie theory in 1994. The theory significantly relied from Merton's strain theory, which had been evolved from Durkheim's understanding of anomie. The goal of the institutional anomie theory is to provide an explanation for overall crime rates.
How does the institutional anomie theory strike you?The Institutional Anomie Theory (IAT) contends that structural institutions like academia have a pervasive "cheating orientation." This theory claims that crime can be understood by looking at American society, particularly the overemphasis on economic success that is part of American culture.
To know more about anomie theory visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/9611270
#SPJ4
Why is it that it takes 9 months for us to be born but a whole 12 months for our first birthday!?
Answers
Answer: Because it celebrates one full year of us being alive. *Birth*day
Explanation:
What is the proper order of a trial
Answers
Opening Statements. Witness Testimony and Cross-Examination. Closing Arguments. Jury Instruction.
Which of the following guidelines has HHS established as standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace?
A. Obtain the consent of the individual, employer, or employee prior to conducting an online person search, assisting with of facilitating enrollment through the Marketplace, assisting the individual in applying for APTC and CSRs, and making updates to a consumer's eligibility application or subsequent plan selection and enrollment.
B. Protect consumer's personally identifiable information (PII)
C. Provide consumers with connect information regarding the Marketplace, QHPs offered through the Marketplace, and insurance affordability programs.
D. Refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
Answers
The guidelines that the Health and Human Services has established as standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
What is the Health and Human Services?This is a federal service that established the standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace in order to protect against conduct that is harmful to consumers or prevents the efficient operation of the Marketplace
Hence, the guidelines on standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
Read more about HHS
brainly.com/question/2093822
#SPJ1
Answer:
d
Explanation: