Complete the analogy.

dry: wet :: cold :

coarse


hot


chilly


moist

The character speaking these lines is Juliet from Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet.

She is expressing her confusion and disbelief that the man before her is not her beloved Romeo, but someone else entirely. This moment of realization highlights the tragic miscommunication and misunderstandings that ultimately lead to the young lovers' untimely deaths.

The lines you've provided, "Tut! I have lost myself; I am not here; This is not Romeo, he's some other where," are spoken by the character Romeo in William Shakespeare's play, "Romeo and Juliet." Specifically, Romeo speaks these lines in Act 1, Scene 1, as he discusses his unrequited love for Rosaline with his cousin Benvolio.

To know more about Shakespeare visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/12122484

#SPJ11

No, KFC does not sell meat from dinosaur descendants. The idea that KFC might use meat from dinosaur descendants is a common internet myth that has been circulating for several years. However, there is no scientific evidence to support this claim. Dinosaurs were extinct millions of years ago, and it is not possible to get their meat in the present day.

Additionally, DNA has a half-life of only a few hundred years, which means that there is no chance of cloning or genetically engineering a dinosaur in the modern world. In reality, KFC uses chicken to make its famous fried chicken. The company sources its chicken from various suppliers around the world and has a strict quality control process to ensure that the chicken meets its standards for safety and quality.

KFC's menu includes a variety of chicken-based products, such as Original Recipe chicken, Extra Crispy chicken, and chicken sandwiches. These products are made using fresh chicken that is seasoned, breaded, and fried to perfection.The myth about KFC using dinosaur meat is just that - a myth. There is no scientific basis for this claim, and KFC has never made any statement to suggest that it uses anything other than chicken in its products.

To know more about meat  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/31635281

#SPJ11

Question: How does Frost's use of imagery contribute to the mood of the poem?

Answer:

Frost presents images of winter, thus contributing to the saddened, grieving mood. Frost presents an image of quiet, undisturbed forest, thus contributing to the calm, reflective mood.

The rhetorical analysis on Excerpt From "Civil Disobedience" by Henry David Thoreau is given below

Excerpt from "Civil Disobedience" by Henry David Thoreau is a powerful essay that advocates for the importance of individual conscience and the need for people to follow their moral beliefs, even if it means going against the government. Thoreau argues that the government often acts unjustly, and individuals have a moral obligation to resist such acts through nonviolent means.

The opening paragraph sets the tone for the essay, and Thoreau immediately establishes his authority as a writer and thinker by referencing his experience of spending a night in jail for refusing to pay a poll tax. He argues that the government is often unjust and that citizens have the right to resist such injustice.

Therefore, Throughout the essay, Thoreau makes use of rhetorical strategies such as repetition, parallelism, and rhetorical questions to emphasize his argument. For example, he repeats the phrase "Unjust laws exist" several times to highlight the pervasive nature of injustice in society.

Learn more about Civil Disobedience from

https://brainly.com/question/325929

#SPJ1

Answer:

This passage is organized using a compare and contrast pattern. It compares and contrasts the sports of skiing and snowboarding by discussing their differences in equipment and competition.

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Imperative is a command. telling someone "turn down the music." is imperative.

The imperative mood sentence in the English grammar is, turn down the music.

In the English Grammar, imperative mood is given the command or the request sentence. The sentences can be in the second-person subject.

The sentence that is representing the command in the sentence is, turn down the music. The sentence did not ask and rather question, while giving the command to work on the operation. Thus, option B is correct.

Learn more about imperative mood, here:

https://brainly.com/question/22950000

#SPJ2

Answer:

I would rather encounter Cyclops instead of Scylla.

Though a Cyclops is a monster, he's one eyed whereas Scylla is a sea-monster with six heads. And sailing would be a hazardous effort with her being in the water.

Explanation:

Cyclops is a one-eyed creature, the son of Poseidon. And even though he's a descendent of the sea god, Cyclops mostly reside on land and are similar to humans, domesticating and living in one place.

On the other hand, Scylla is a sea monster with six heads. This will make sea journeys a disaster, for she will rule the seas.

Sailing requires a journey on the seas, which is the realm of Scylla. It is her home-ground, where she knows everything and is capable of destroying everything. A Cyclops may be dangerous but not that hazardous for sea travels.

So, I would prefer to encounter Cyclops rather than a sea monster.

Answer:

excitment

Explanation:

sorry its been two hour if i had found this sooner i would have answered

Answer: excitement

Explanation:

Answer Part A:

Climate change will have long-lasting effects on our environment.

Answer Part B:

"So even if we stopped emitting all greenhouse gases today, global warming and climate change will continue to affect future generations."

NASA employs the world's largest concentration of climate scientists. NASA's mission to study Earth involves monitoring atmospheric conditions, global temperatures, land cover and vegetation, ice extent, ocean productivity, and a number of other planetary vital signs with a fleet of space-based sensors.

From solar arrays and fuel cells to Earth-observing satellites, more efficient aircraft, climate models, and air/water/waste recycling systems, NASA's contributions to Earth, the environment, and green technologies continue today.

Learn more about Climate change here: brainly.com/question/18332655

#SPJ2

From inference, the parallel structures serve to emphasize. Hence the correct answer is Option A.

The parallel structure or parallelism is a system or technique in the literature that draws from repetition. The purpose of repetition is to emphasize.

Please note that information about the poem was not given hence the general answer to help you understand parallel structures.

Learn more about Parallel Structure at:
https://brainly.com/question/815497

Answer: It emphasizes that the speaker and Annabel Lee are a good match

Btw always look at the answer and not just the letter. Edmentum doesn't letter answers the same for everyone.

Answer:

If i saw a person stealing or trying to break a bike lock i would yell at them or report them for stealing. I would do this because stealing is bad and the owner of it spent alot of money on it. No, I have not witnessed anyone stealing. people steal bikes to sell, or use them for themselves. The reactions change because people view differnt races as bad or worse then others. It depends if they let a white person steal it but saw a colored person and yelled at the colored person yes, it would be considered racist.if a black woman was trying to steal it she might get yelled at but women arent considered as very bad more of a men issue is stealing. The gender nor their race would matter stealing is stealing and its not ok. The safest way would be to Yell at them to scare them from a distance and hope they dont do it again and if they still steal it call the cops.

Explanation:

Answer:

Because

Explanation:

So, basically, transition words are used to link two ideas expressed. They can follow the same idea explaining it in more detals (also, additionally, besides etc.), they can show contrast (conversely, contrary, on the other hand), they can show cause-effect link (since, because etc.), they can conclude something (so, finally, therefore etc.)...

Here, first sentence informs us on the epidemics and the second shows that it was the reason Knox fled to Manhattan. Since it shows why something happened, the best choice out of given options is BECAUSE.

Answer:

Answer: Because

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

B i believe

Someone was late this morning, weren't they?

The addition of question tags at the end of a statement is a way to seek confirmation or agreement from the listener. The choice of the question tag depends on the main verb used in the statement and the subject of the sentence. In this case, "someone" is the subject, and the main verb is "was late."

By adding the question tag "Weren't they?" to the end of the sentence, it creates a question seeking affirmation or agreement from the listener about the statement. The use of "weren't" as the auxiliary verb in the question tag is appropriate because the main verb "was" is in the past tense.

The question tag serves to prompt a response from the listener, inviting them to confirm or deny the statement made. It implies that the speaker expects the listener to agree that someone was indeed late this morning. The question tag also conveys a sense of surprise or seeking further information about the identity of the person who was late.

Question tags are commonly used in spoken English to engage the listener in conversation, clarify information, or seek confirmation. They help in maintaining a conversational flow and encourage active participation from the listener.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

Add appropriate question tags to the following sentence,

Someone was late this morning

Know more about Question tag here:

https://brainly.com/question/16977582

#SPJ8

Answer:

The Toulmin Method is a formula that allows writers to build a sturdy logical foundation for their arguments. First proposed by author Stephen Toulmin in The Uses of Argument (1958), the Toulmin Method emphasizes building a thorough support structure for each of an argument's key claims.

The basic format for the Toulmin Method is as follows:

Claim: In this section, you explain your overall thesis on the subject. In other words, you make your main argument.

Data (Grounds): You should use evidence to support the claim. In other words, provide the reader with facts that prove your argument is strong.

Warrant (Bridge): In this section, you explain why or how your data supports the claim. As a result, the underlying assumption that you build your argument on is grounded in reason.

Backing (Foundation): Here, you provide any additional logic or reasoning that may be necessary to support the warrant.

Counterclaim: You should anticipate a counterclaim that negates the main points in your argument. Don't avoid arguments that oppose your own. Instead, become familiar with the opposing perspective. If you respond to counterclaims, you appear unbiased (and, therefore, you earn the respect of your readers). You may even want to include several counterclaims to show that you have thoroughly researched the topic.

Rebuttal: In this section, you incorporate your own evidence that disagrees with the counterclaim. It is essential to include a thorough warrant or bridge to strengthen your essay’s argument. If you present data to your audience without explaining how it supports your thesis, your readers may not make a connection between the two, or they may draw different conclusions.

EXAMPLE OF THE TOULMIN METHOD:

Claim: Hybrid cars are an effective strategy to fight pollution.

Data1: Driving a private car is a typical citizen's most air-polluting activity.

Warrant 1: Due to the fact that cars are the largest source of private (as opposed to industrial) air pollution, switching to hybrid cars should have an impact on fighting pollution.

Data 2: Each vehicle produced is going to stay on the road for roughly 12 to 15 years.

Warrant 2: Cars generally have a long lifespan, meaning that the decision to switch to a hybrid car will make a long-term impact on pollution levels.

Data 3: Hybrid cars combine a gasoline engine with a battery-powered electric motor.

Warrant 3: The combination of these technologies produces less pollution.

Counterclaim: Instead of focusing on cars, which still encourages an inefficient culture of driving even as it cuts down on pollution, the nation should focus on building and encouraging the use of mass transit systems.

Rebuttal: While mass transit is an idea that should be encouraged, it is not feasible in many rural and suburban areas, or for people who must commute to work. Thus, hybrid cars are a better solution for much of the nation's population.

Answer:

Step 1: Copy and paste an analytical claim in the box below. Identify the type of claim being made (facts/definition, cause, and effect, value, or solution). Then, revise the statement to make it work better as a specific type of claim.

Electrical cars are an effective strategy to pollute the environment less.

Step 2: What are the two sides of the argument involved in your claim, and which do you support? Revise the latest version of your thesis statement (the one you from the end of Step 1) so that it becomes clearer which side of the argument your claim expresses or explains.

One side of the argument is people that think that switching is a great idea and will make a change. The other side is people who maybe don’t want to change or people that don’t think switching will change anything.

New thesis statement: Electrical cars are an effective strategy to pollute the environment less. I support this idea.

Step 3: How can you make your thesis statement more precise? Is it narrow enough? Can you add more specific information to it? Revise the latest version of your thesis statement to make It more precise or specific.

New thesis statement: Electrical cars are an effective strategy to pollute the environment less.. I support this idea and maybe after time, we will see a difference in our air.

Step 4: What type of sentence is your thesis statement? Is that the best type for what you want to say? Identify your claim’s clauses and phrases and look for ways that you might modify the sentence structure to make the statement more clear and precise. Revise the latest version of your thesis statement in the space below, rearranging or revising its parts to make it stronger.

My final thesis statement: Electrical vehicles are a powerful procedure to contaminate the climate less. I support this thought and perhaps after time, we will see a distinction in our air and there will be less contamination.

Explanation:

The letters in bold are the answers to the questions.

Answer:

Cognates are words in two languages that share a similar meaning, spelling, and pronunciation. While English may share very few cognates with a language like Chinese, 30-40% of all words in English have a related word in Spanish. For Spanish-speaking Ells, cognates are an obvious bridge to the English language.

Explanation:

The English words sear and shear sound similar, but they do not mean that they are cognates.

Cognates are words in two languages that share the same origin, pronunciation, and voice. While English and Chinese have few parallels, 30-40% of all English terms have a Spanish counterpart. Cognates provide an obvious bridge to English for Ells who speak Spanish.

The term Sear refers to have a profound negative impact on someone's emotions or memories. It also means to burn, injure and mark.

A shearing is a type of tool that resembles a long length of scissors. It used in the cutting of the hairs of the wool. Although the English terms sear and shear sound similar, they are not cognates.

Therefore, it can be concluded that two languages that share the same origin and shares similar meaning are regarded as cognates.

Learn more about Cognates here:

https://brainly.com/question/28234948

#SPJ2

In the poem "The Black Man's Burden," by Reverend H. T. Johnson, the speaker makes the following connection between colonized people everywhere and black people in the United States:

- Black people in the US and colonized people in other countries are all victims of imperialism, racism, and oppression. They are all subjugated by more powerful people, with better guns and excuses to kill and enslave.

The poem "The Black Man's Burden" was written by Reverend H. T. Johnson as a response to Rudyard Kipling's poem "The White Man's Burden."

Kipling's poem claims that it is the duty of white men to colonize and subjugate other people in order to improve those people's lives. He claims white people are bringing civilization to the world.

Johnson's poem responds to that claim with a sarcastic request. He asks white men to keep on oppressing black people.

He compares the colonization of people around to world to the plight of black people in the US, since they are all victims of the same injustice.

But, in the end, the speaker states that white men have no power against God, and that their actions will certainly be judged by Him.

Learn more about "The Black Man's Burden" here:

https://brainly.com/question/3998936

Our author would consider all of the following as skills: Walking, tying a shoelace, hitting a tennis ball, and doing a backflip.

Skills are defined as the abilities or competencies that individuals acquire through learning, practice, and experience. They encompass a wide range of activities and can vary in complexity and context. In this case, the question presents several activities: walking, tying a shoelace, hitting a tennis ball, and doing a backflip.

Walking is a fundamental motor skill that most individuals learn in early childhood. Tying a shoelace involves fine motor coordination and is often taught as a practical skill during childhood. Hitting a tennis ball requires hand-eye coordination, technique, and physical fitness, making it a skill commonly developed through training and practice. Doing a backflip, on the other hand, is a more advanced physical skill that requires agility, strength, and acrobatic training.

Our author would consider all of these activities as skills because they involve the acquisition and refinement of specific abilities through deliberate practice and training. Whether it's a basic motor skill like walking or a more specialized skill like hitting a tennis ball or doing a backflip, each activity requires a certain level of proficiency that can be developed through dedicated effort.

Learn more about Skill Development

brainly.com/question/31262774

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. Nature triumphs over man's folly.

Explanation:

btw there is no section b

Answer:

3. asking the reader to put themself in the situation of a character

Juror 8, also known as Davis, is a central character in the play "Twelve Angry Men" by Reginald Rose. During the initial voting sequence in the play, when all the other 11 jurors vote "guilty" in the case they are deliberating, Juror 8 is the only one who votes "not guilty."

While the specific thoughts of Juror 8 are not explicitly mentioned in the play, his actions and subsequent discussions provide insight into his thinking. Juror 8 votes "not guilty" because he has reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt and believes that further discussion and examination of the evidence is necessary. He questions the reliability and credibility of the evidence presented, leading him to consider the possibility of the defendant's innocence.

Juror 8's vote reflects his commitment to justice, fairness, and the principle of reasonable doubt. He wants to ensure that a potentially innocent person is not wrongly convicted. While the other jurors may be ready to render a quick verdict, Juror 8 wants to engage in a thoughtful and thorough deliberation process to reach a just outcome.

Throughout the play, Juror 8 actively challenges the assumptions and prejudices of the other jurors, urging them to reconsider their initial stance. He seeks to uncover the truth by examining the evidence, questioning witnesses' testimonies, and pointing out inconsistencies in the case. Ultimately, Juror 8's intention is to stimulate critical thinking and ensure a fair and impartial decision based on the evidence presented.

To know more about juror 8 thinking
Visit https://brainly.com/question/33625145
#SPJ11

Answer: its  The close shot lets the audience see the tension and emotion in Les Goodman’s face.

Explanation:

The close shot lets the audience see the tension and emotion that is going on the scene. The camera taking the close shot help show the audience the intense conflict on Goodman's face.

A close shot is a video shot taken with the camera close to the person or object but far enough away to include some of the background. It is a camera shot in which most, if not all, of the frame is filled with an and actor's face or an important feature, detail, or object.

A tightly cropped shot that shows a subject (or object) up close and with significantly more detail than the human eye normally perceives is referred to as close up photography. Close up photography narrows the field of view, making the subject larger and creating a tight frame around your chosen shot.

Therefore, a close shot camera view  help show that an intense conflict is going on in the scene.

To learn more about close shot, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3309595

#SPJ2

Answer:

peace heroes

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is D.

Explanation:

(The sound of a police siren.)

Those sections of your screenplay that appear surrounding your conversation and which serve to explain the action, scene, and people are called stage directions.

In Act 2, Scene 1,, Macbeth is by himself and experiences a vision of a dagger in front of him that he attempts to grab hold of but is unsuccessful.

He's uncertain if it's a mere fabrication of his mind or an indication of an upcoming disaster. Macbeth views the dagger as a representation of his planned assassination of the king, and he experiences an overwhelming urge to follow its guidance.

The sequence demonstrates how Macbeth is becoming increasingly paranoid and conflicted as he considers carrying out the heinous deed. Notably, the phrases "Is that a dagger I see in front of me" and "My eyes are deceiving my other senses" highlight Macbeth's confused mental state.

The scene exudes an ominous, tense ambiance, underscoring Macbeth's spiraling descent into insanity.

Read more about Macbeth here:

https://brainly.com/question/14027498

#SPJ1

Answer:

Read each day for 7 days a week.

Explanation: Maybe try 25 minutes each day.

Answer:

Choose a long book to read that you are interested in.

Set a timer or a reminder everyday to read at least 10 pages.

Write a summary of each chapter you read.

Find time to read to a friend, family, or even your pet.

Go to the library or read e-books.

Read popular books like Harry Potter or Percy Jackson.

Werewolves are similar to zombies and vampires in that they are horror movie characters and have the form of humans with additional features. On the other hand, they are different because werewolves transform on a full moon and have claws and fur.

A werewolf is a fictional character that has been popularized in different audiovisual productions of the horror genre. The werewolf arises from several legends in which the existence of a human character who transforms into a wolf is told.

Like zombies and vampires, werewolves are characters associated with movies, television shows, and horror stories. Additionally, they are similar to vampires and zombies because they have a human form with additional characteristics, in the case of werewolves they have physical characteristics such as claws, fangs and fur; in the case of vampires they have long fangs and feed on blood; In the case of zombies, they have human bodies, however they are dead.

The differences that werewolves have with respect to vampires and zombies is that werewolves transform when the full moon rises, while vampires and zombies do not need the moon to transform. On the other hand, werewolves are related to the wolf, so they have characteristics such as fur and claws, while the others do not have these characteristics.

Learn more about werewolves in: https://brainly.com/question/28981555

#SPJ1