Choose the answer with all the conditions that are required for the government to take private property under Eminent Domain law.

the owner will be given double the market price for the property

property will be taken for public use and the owner will be properly compensated

property will be taken for public use and the owner will be warned two years in advance

property will be taken for public use and the owner will agree to move

Right for a Speedy Trial: This constitutional right is regarded as one of the most significant. Without it, suspects in felony cases risk being imprisoned indefinitely on false accusations.

In order to guarantee that a criminal defendant has a fair trial, they also have a right to a quick trial. The particulars of the case must be taken into consideration while deciding whether to waive time.

The defence may be able to push the prosecution to go to trial before it is ready, but it can be a hazardous tactic. Generally speaking, it makes sense to devote the time necessary to adequately preparing a defence.

Learn more about speedy trial Visit: brainly.com/question/20768792

#SPJ4

answer: Chief Legislator

Answer:

Human trafficking is the trade of humans for the purpose of forced labour, sexual slavery, or commercial sexual exploitation for the trafficker or others. This may encompass providing a spouse in the context of forced marriage, or the extraction of organs or tissues, including for surrogacy and ova removal. Human trafficking can occur within a country or trans-nationally. Human trafficking is a crime against the person because of the violation of the victim's rights of movement through coercion and because of their commercial exploitation. Human trafficking is the trade in people, especially women and children, and does not necessarily involve the movement of the person from one place to another.

Hope this help!:)

Answer:

Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act.

Explanation:

Shay's Rebellion was a protest by Massachusetts farmers in 1786-1787 against foreclosures by state courts. (C)

Led by Daniel Shays, the rebellion was a response to the economic and political instability of the post-Revolutionary War period, which saw high taxes and indebtedness for many farmers. The farmers, who were mostly former soldiers, demanded relief from debt and taxes, as well as the suspension of court proceedings against debtors.

The rebellion was eventually put down by state and federal troops, and its leaders were arrested and tried for treason.

Shay's Rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which lacked a strong central government and the ability to maintain order. It contributed to the call for a stronger federal government and the drafting of the U.S. Constitution in 1787.

To know more about Shay's Rebellion click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/19692099#

#SPJ11

Answer:

A focus group is a carefully planned discussion led by a moderator designed to gather opinions on a defined topic. While focus group research is an excellent methodology to meet many research objectives, there are times to use them and times to not use them.

in simpler words:  A focus group is a small set of six to ten people who usually share common characteristics such as age, background, geography, etc.. The set comes together to discuss a predetermined topic. A focus group is a part of marketing research technique.

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

While double jeopardy prohibits different prosecutions for the same offense, it does not protect defendants from multiple prosecutions for multiple offenses. For example, a person acquitted of a murder could be tried again on the “lesser included offense” of involuntary manslaughter. The U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment contains a Double Jeopardy Clause, which says that no person shall "be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." Most state constitutions similarly protect individuals from being tried twice for the same crime.

Answer:

that’s a hard one

Answer: Heyaa! ~

Here is how a bill becomes a law!

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps you! ~

Answer:

Here is how a bill becomes a law

Explanation:

Step 1: The bill is drafted

Step 2: The bill is introduced.

Step 3: The bill goes to committee.

Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill.

Step 5: Committee mark up of the bill.

Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill.

Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber.

Step 8: The bill goes to the president.

Step 9: Overriding a veto

Step 10: NOW A LAW!

The death penalty is a sensitive issue in Texas that has drawn significant attention over the years. While some people believe that the death penalty is an appropriate sentence for capital cases, others argue that it should be abolished. The death penalty should be abolished because it is expensive, unreliable, and inhumane.

Firstly, the death penalty is an expensive option for capital cases. The process of the death penalty is complicated and involves many steps that require considerable financial resources. Appeals, investigations, and trials take up a significant portion of the criminal justice system’s budget. The cost of legal representation, juries, and judges, as well as appeals, can add up to several million dollars per case. In some cases, the cost of the death penalty is so high that it exceeds the cost of life imprisonment without parole. Therefore, abolishing the death penalty would free up a significant amount of funds that could be allocated to other areas of the criminal justice system.

Secondly, the death penalty is unreliable. There have been numerous cases in which innocent people have been sentenced to death. Flaws in the criminal justice system, such as the unreliability of eyewitness testimony and forensic science, have resulted in wrongful convictions. The possibility of an innocent person being put to death is a serious risk that cannot be ignored. For this reason, the death penalty should be abolished to prevent the risk of wrongful convictions.

Lastly, the death penalty is inhumane. The act of putting someone to death is a brutal and barbaric punishment. The process of execution, whether by lethal injection, electric chair, or any other method, is a traumatic experience that violates human dignity. Furthermore, the death penalty perpetuates a cycle of violence that does not address the root causes of crime.

In conclusion, the death penalty is a flawed and outdated practice that should be abolished. Its abolition would save taxpayers’ money, reduce the risk of wrongful convictions, and uphold human dignity. Life imprisonment without parole is a viable alternative that would provide an appropriate punishment for capital cases.

To know more about death penalty visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31880130

#SPJ11

Answer:   Involuntary Manslaughter

Explanation:  

It is believed that Terry did not intentionally commit a crime. Intent would have resulted in a murder case. Murder, whether or not it is  premeditated or unpremeditated, is intentional. The difference with manslaughter is that: voluntary manslaughter, while requiring intent, also involves a circumstance in which a reasonable person becomes emotionally disturbed and fueled by passion or impulse rather than judgement. Involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing that results from criminal negligence or recklessness. (no intent or heat of passion).

Elements of crime committed:  

Actus Reus and the element of harm come into play with Terry's case. Because there wasn't causation for his brother's death, the intent element isn't present. Terry has no guilty state of mind.

False .

Cooperation between states does not necessarily imply a loss of political sovereignty. While it is true that states may sometimes cede a degree of authority in certain areas to facilitate cooperation, this is often done with the understanding that the benefits of such cooperation outweigh the potential loss of autonomy. In many cases, states maintain their political sovereignty while engaging in cooperative agreements, treaties, or international organizations. It is important to recognize that cooperation can actually enhance the ability of states to exercise their sovereignty effectively, particularly in an increasingly interconnected world.

The question of whether cooperation between states implies a loss of political sovereignty is a complex one, and the answer depends on a variety of factors. At its core, political sovereignty refers to a state's ability to exercise authority and control over its territory and people, and to make decisions independently of external actors. The concept of sovereignty is closely linked to ideas of independence, autonomy, and self-determination, and is considered a foundational principle of modern international relations. However, it is important to note that cooperation does not necessarily imply a loss of sovereignty. In fact, many forms of international cooperation are based on the principle of sovereign equality among member states. This means that each state is considered equal in terms of its rights and responsibilities, and that decisions are made through consensus-building and negotiation rather than through imposition or coercion. In this sense, cooperation can actually strengthen a state's sovereignty by providing it with a platform to voice its interests and concerns on the global stage.

To know more about Cooperation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31784454

#SPJ11

Answer:  the correct answer is The Jim Crow Laws

Explanation:

The Jim Crow Laws were enacted after the Civil War by the Southern States to impose racial segregation and discrimination against black people.

The process of exercising the powers and functions, which are available in the hands of a body or an institution authorized by the government, is known as legislation.

For the purpose of passing of a legislation, it is important for someone to have an authority. A legislation can be passed, brought into effect, amended, modified or debarred by the bodies of a legislative assembly.

Hence, the significance of a legislation is aforementioned.

Learn more about legislation here:

https://brainly.com/question/782960

#SPJ1

Answer:

We all want a cri- justice system that's sensible, effective, and creates a safe society with less cr*me

Explanation:

Answer:

i actually dont think that death penalty should be legal. unless the person killed BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of innocent people or did so many bad things that police and stuff even lost track,i think that anyone should go on death row. (or whatever its called). poeple that go to prison for years still have a chance at life. they have a chance to change and stuff.

i think that a . death penalty for ANYONE is too harsh

thats my opinion :)

Municipal courts have jurisdiction over violations of city ordinances. Thus the correct option is B.

Courts are said to as judicial bodies that assist in resolving disagreements and disputes by rendering fair judgments or forming agreements among the parties involved and help in making fair decisions.

City ordinance violations are submitted to jurisdiction by municipal courts. Original jurisdiction for any violations of legally established city regulations shall exclusively rest with the municipal court.

Therefore, option B is appropriate.

Learn more about Court, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ1

Most criminal and civil cases can be decided by a petit jury, which is a jury of citizens that determines the guilt or innocence of a person during a trial. The term "petit" comes from the Latin word "pletus," which means "full." A petit jury is typically composed of 12 jurors, but it can be smaller in some cases.

In the United States, the right to a trial by jury is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. This means that a person accused of a crime has the right to have their case decided by a jury of their peers. The jury is responsible for determining whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

A petit jury is also used in some civil cases. In these cases, the jury is responsible for determining whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages from the defendant. The size of the jury in a civil case can vary, but it is typically smaller than a petit jury in a criminal case.

To know more about petit jury:

https://brainly.com/question/31832474

#SPJ4

Answer:

a member of congress

Explanation:

I think im not 100% though

Answer:

Explanation:

Birth , meaning the Law of Soil , which is a citizenship law stating that all or nearly all persons born in the physical jurisdiction of a state are citizens of that state. That is, under the law of the soil, the citizenship of one's parents is irrelevant

Naturalization, Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a lawful permanent resident after meeting the requirements established by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act

In simple terms, you can become a citizen by being born in America, even if your parents weren't and regardless of ethnicity, or by applying for citizenship after meeting the requirements.

Answer:

By keeping them out of hazardous jobs

Jail staff in most facilities and sheriffs' departments are typically paid less than those on patrol due to the difference in duties and responsibilities.

Patrol officers are responsible for responding to emergencies, making arrests, and conducting investigations, which requires a higher level of training and expertise.

Jail staff, on the other hand, are responsible for the supervision and care of inmates, which is a less specialized and less dangerous job.

Additionally, patrol officers typically work in more dangerous and challenging environments, which often results in higher pay. However, it is important to note that pay can vary based on the specific facility or department and the level of experience and education of the individual.

For more similar questions on duties:

brainly.com/question/27871841

#SPJ11

True, to initiate a lawsuit, the plaintiff must file a complaint with the appropriate court.

The complaint typically outlines the plaintiff's legal claims against the defendant and the relief sought. Once the complaint is filed, the court will issue a summons to notify the defendant of the lawsuit and provide them with an opportunity to respond to the allegations. The defendant's response to the complaint is typically called an answer. The court will then proceed with the litigation process, which may involve discovery, motion practice, and ultimately a trial or settlement.

Learn more about lawsuit here

https://brainly.com/question/25389760

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

Explanation:

alcohol is a depressant and marijuana is a stimulant

The defendant could be properly convicted of Murder or to be specific Involuntary manslaughter

What do you mean by murder?

It can be defined as the crime of intentionally killing a person.In cases like these, the court either punishes the killer with either the death penalty or life imprisonment. The case of death of a star player was ultimately linked to blood loss caused by a bullet shot.

Therefore manslaughter which can be further defined as the killing of a person without malice aforethought but with either the intention to commit an unlawful act that leads to an unintended death has committed by the defendant which led to charges of murder.

Hence, The defendant could be properly convicted of Murder or to be specific Involuntary manslaughter

To learn more about Murder from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/28478113

#SPJ4

In the Classical world, the political and personal realms were deeply interconnected, with the actions and decisions of individuals having significant implications on both spheres. The intertwining of politics and personal life can be observed in various Classical societies, including Persia, Rome, Athens, and Early Christianity.

In Persia, the political world was closely tied to personal life through the concept of kingship. The Persian king, known as the Shah or Emperor, held absolute power and was considered the embodiment of divine authority. Personal loyalty and obedience to the king were highly valued, and failure to demonstrate loyalty could result in severe consequences. The personal lives of individuals were therefore heavily influenced by their allegiance to the political order, as any perceived disloyalty could lead to loss of status, exile, or even execution. Similarly, in Rome, personal life was intertwined with politics, particularly among the ruling elite. The concept of "mos maiorum" emphasized the importance of upholding traditional Roman values and social norms. The political success and reputation of individuals often depended on their adherence to these societal expectations in their personal conduct, such as maintaining strong family ties, demonstrating virtuous behavior, and fulfilling public duties. Personal scandals or moral transgressions could have detrimental effects on one's political standing and aspirations for office.In Athens, personal life was also political in nature, especially for male citizens who actively participated in the democratic system. Athenian citizens were expected to engage in public affairs, attend assemblies, and serve in various civic roles. The political participation of individuals was closely tied to their personal reputation and honor within the community. The ability to deliver persuasive speeches, form alliances, and gain the trust of fellow citizens played crucial roles in shaping one's political influence. Additionally, decisions made within the family unit, such as the selection of marriage partners or the upbringing of children, could have political implications, as alliances and connections formed through familial ties could influence political networks.
In Early Christianity, personal life was intertwined with politics through the establishment of a distinct religious community with its own moral codes and expectations. Early Christians faced persecution and oppression from the Roman Empire, which sought to suppress the growth of this new religious movement. The personal beliefs and practices of Christians often clashed with the dominant political and social norms of the time, leading to conflicts and tensions. Personal decisions to adhere to Christian teachings, participate in communal rituals, or openly identify as Christians were inherently political acts that challenged the established order.
Overall, in the Classical world, the political and personal spheres were intimately connected. Loyalty to rulers, adherence to societal norms, political participation, and religious affiliations all influenced personal lives and vice versa. The examples of Persia, Rome, Athens, and Early Christianity demonstrate the complex interplay between politics and personal life, highlighting how individual actions and choices carried broader political significance in these societies.

To know more about Classical world, click here https://brainly.com/question/5338138

#SPJ11

Virginia race to the 2000 presidential election as voters chose 13 representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

The similarities and differences between the 2000 election and other elections is that the 2000 election was very close. Even though Al Gore won the popular vote, the election was ultimately decided by the electoral votes of Florida. The election in Florida was decided by only 500 votes and was disputed because of problems with the voting machines.

Virginia had not gone Democratic in a presidential contest since 1964 and was won by Texas governor George W. Bush with a margin of victory of 8.04%.

Learn more about Virginia, here:

https://brainly.com/question/19497558

#SPJ1

Answer:

The legislative procedure comprises three main phases: the tabling of the text, its examination by the Parliament and its promulgation by the President of the Republic (after a possible referral to the Constitutional Council for examination of the conformity of the text with the Constitution).

A bill goes through all stages of the legislative process through "a long series of standard motions" on which the House must vote favorably before the bill can become law. [123].

Explanation: