Children are internally motivated to perceive the world and to act in accordance with their developing:
Answers
Children are internally motivated to perceive the world and to act in accordance with their developing schemas.
What is a Schema?
In social science, schema refers to mental structures that an individual employs to organize knowledge and guide cognitive processes and behavior. People use schemata (plural for schema) to categorize objects and events based on shared elements and characteristics, allowing them to interpret and predict the world.
In Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, British psychologist Frederic Bartlett introduced the concept of schema for the first time.
In general, the learner in schema theory actively constructs and revises schemata in response to repeated exposure to new information.
Based on partial information structures, schemas enable one to perceive the entire picture of an event or object. Because each schema has a main category, a so-called slot that connects different semantic networks, this reference is possible.
To learn more on Schema from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/27507218
#SPJ4
Related Questions
According to the expectancy theory, for people's motivation to be high, ______ must be high. (Choose all that apply.)
Answers
According to the expectancy theory, for people's motivation to be high, several factors must be high. These factors include expectancy, instrumentality, and valence.
Expectancy refers to an individual's belief that their effort will lead to a particular level of performance. Instrumentality refers to the belief that the level of performance will lead to specific outcomes. Valence refers to the degree of attractiveness or desirability of the outcomes. Therefore, for people's motivation to be high, all three of these factors must be high. They must believe that their efforts will lead to the desired level of performance, that this performance will lead to desirable outcomes, and that these outcomes are highly valued.
Expectancy theory suggests that individuals are motivated to act in certain ways based on their beliefs about the relationship between their efforts, performance, and outcomes. Therefore, if any of these factors are low, an individual's motivation will decrease. In contrast, if all three factors are high, an individual's motivation will increase.
In conclusion, for people's motivation to be high, expectancy, instrumentality, and valence must all be high. This theory suggests that individuals will be motivated to act in ways that they believe will lead to desirable outcomes. By understanding these factors, managers can design systems that increase employee motivation and drive high levels of performance.
To know more about Expectancy Theory visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27502489
#SPJ11
Are the 3 branches of government affected or benefited by the votes?
Answers
Answer:
The three branches of government in the United States are the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The legislative branch is responsible for making laws, the executive branch is responsible for enforcing laws, and the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting laws.
In a democratic system of government, such as the United States, the votes of the general population play a crucial role in determining the composition and actions of the three branches of government. The legislative branch is directly affected by the votes of the general population, as they elect representatives to Congress who will make laws on their behalf. The executive branch is also indirectly affected by the votes of the general population, as the President and other executive officials are elected by the people. The judicial branch is generally not directly affected by the votes of the general population, as judges are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
Overall, the three branches of government are both affected and benefited by the votes of the general population. The votes help to ensure that the government is accountable to the people and reflects their will, and can also provide a mandate for the government to take certain actions or pursue certain policies.
pls award brainliest!
Explanation:
Was there a president under the articles of confederation.
Answers
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Cause it consisted of two government and no one would want the other's position to succeed its own government
around 1910, two astronomers named hertzsprung and russell discovered a relationship that the stars in the main sequence have in common. what is this relationship?A. stars with greater temperatures tend to have lower magnitudesB. stars with greater magnitudes tend to have lower temperatuesC. stars with greater masses tend to have lower temperaturesD. stars with greater magnitudes tend to have higher temperatures
Answers
The correct relationship is D. stars with greater magnitudes tend to have higher temperatures.
This relationship is known as the Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) Diagram, and it is a tool used to classify stars based on their temperature and brightness.
The H-R Diagram was developed by astronomers Ejnar Hertzsprung and Henry Norris Russell, who plotted the luminosity (brightness) of stars against their spectral type (temperature, ranging from coldest to hottest).
This allowed them to discover the correlation between a star's temperature and luminosity. Warm stars tend to have brighter luminosities than cooler stars; hence, stars with greater magnitudes tend to have higher temperatures.
This relationship has been used to classify stars into main sequence, red giants, supergiants, and white dwarfs.
For more questions like Astronomers visit the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28810700
#SPJ4
What does the Hersey and Blanchard situational theory model depend on from subordinates?
Answers
The Hersey-Blanchard model relies on a leader's decision-making ability and uses an individualistic rather than a group-oriented approach.
Hersey Blanchard Model:
The Hersey-Blanchard model is a leadership model that focuses on the capabilities and motivations of individual employees. The model developed by Paul Hershey and Kenneth Blanchard is also known as the situational leadership model. Unlike other leadership models, the Hersey-Blanchard model ignores the idea that organizations need a unified approach to leadership. Instead, the model suggests leadership styles that adapt to the unique circumstances of each workplace. By assessing each employee's skills and experience, leaders can tailor leadership practices to support employee professional development. This further develops management methods that continuously adapt to the professional development of employees.
Based on the Hersey-Blanchard model, the four groups of followers are:
1. They are also unmotivated and lack confidence in their own abilities.
2. Followers are usually unable to carry out their duties due to lack of skill and experience. But you still want to try that task. This is an example of a new employee who is motivated to succeed but lacks sufficient knowledge and skills.
3. Followers have the ability and experience to perform duties, but are unwilling to do so. This may be due to a lack of confidence in one's own abilities or a lack of motivation to follow the manager's lead.
4. Followers of D4 have the skills, experience, and confidence necessary to successfully complete their tasks. Employees are at their best and able to complete their tasks while being accountable for their work.
Learn more about Hersey-Blanchard model :
https://brainly.com/question/30327818
#SPJ4
_____ pressure is associated with clear skies and fair weather and _____ pressure is associated with overcast and wet weather.
Answers
Answer:
low pressure is associated with clear skies amd fair weather.high pressure is associated with over cast and
wet weather
Explanation:
when the there is high pressure in the atmosphere there will be rain,but when there is low pressure the sky is clear or has fair weather.
Robespierre and his supporters created a new calendar. Why would they want to wipe out ""every trace of france’s past?"".
Answers
Robespierre and his supporters created a new calendar to wipe out the past of France to set a ¨republic of virtue¨. They wanted to wipe out the past because they thought religion was old fashioned and dangerous.
INTERPRETATION-
Robespierre and his supporters set out to build a "republic of virtue." He wanted to wipe out every trace of France's past, so they changed the calendar, dividing the the year into 12 months of 30 days, and renamed every month.
This calendar also had no Sundays because the radicals considered religion old-fashioned and dangerous. They even closed all churches in Paris and later all over France.
July 1793 Robespierre became leader of the Committee of Public Safety and governed France virtually as a dictator and the period became known as the Reign of Terror. He often had enemies tried in the morning and guillotined in the afternoon justifying it by saying it enabled French citizens to remain true to the ideals of the Revolution.
The "enemies of the Revolution" that caused trouble were fellow radicals who challenged his leadership, many of those who had led the Revolution received death sentences. Their crime was that they were less radical than Robespierre.
Many famous people were killed during the Reign of Terror including Marie Antoinette and George Danton as well as 40,000 other people. 85% executed were peasants or members of the urban poor or middle class the same people that the Revolution was supposed to benefit. July 1794 members of the National Convention turned on Robespierre fearing their own safety.
The radical phase ended on July 28, 1794 when Robespierre was executed by the guillotine. In 1795 another plan of government, the third since 1789, placed power in the hands of the upper middle class and called for a two house legislature and an executive body of five men, known as the Directory. Some of the men were corrupt but it gave the country a period of order and Napoleon Bonaparte became general of France's armies.
Learn more about Robespierre on:
brainly.com/question/19262506
#SPJ4
When something is added to a second line of Hebrew poetry, it is called:
Answers
When something is added to a second line of Hebrew poetry, it is called a "parallelism." Parallelism is a technique in Hebrew poetry where a second line is added to the first line, often repeating or contrasting the same idea in a slightly different way.
This technique is used to add depth and meaning to the poetry and is commonly found in the Hebrew Bible. In Hebrew poetry, the use of bicola is an important literary technique that involves adding something to a second line of poetry. A bicola is a pair of two lines in poetry where the second line is connected to or builds upon the meaning of the first line.
This technique helps to create a sense of parallelism and repetition, emphasizing important themes and ideas in the poem. By adding something to the second line, the poet can expand on the meaning of the first line, providing a fuller and more complete expression of the poem's message. The use of bicola is common in many different forms of Hebrew poetry and is considered a fundamental aspect of the language's literary tradition.
Learn more about Hebrew here:
https://brainly.com/question/29418648
#SPJ11
HURRY 50 POINTS
The issue of undocumented immigration in America is a topic of much debate. Some people believe that undocumented workers should be granted amnesty, while others believe that amnesty is not the right course of action.
Consider both sides of the amnesty issue and decide if you support or oppose amnesty.
In one paragraph, explain your position and defend your opinion with evidence in the form of details, examples, or statistics.
Answers
Answer:
below
Explanation:
To answer this question, we must first define "amnesty" to be based on something we can argue about. Amnesty, as defined by Merriam-Webster, is when a person or group in authority pardons a individual (or group of individuals) of a offense that they have done. The next thing we need to define is "undocumented workers". Undocumented Workers, as defined by WorkPlace Fairness, is not having met the requirements to be able to secure a citizenship or a permit, but is allowed to have working rights in the United States.
The question that is being asked here is whether or not illegal immigrants should be allowed to continue to work and live in a "legalized" status. In my opinion, they should not be allowed to be given amnesty. Remember, they are here for only to work, and if there is no other thing interfering with them being able to live inside their country (such as civil war, famine, persecution, etc.), they should continue to go through the same channel as others. Amnesty should only be granted to those who are in desperate need of it, and not to just anybody outside the country.
High on a mountaintop in Peru stands an ancient Inca city called Machu Picchu. About 800,000 tourists visit the city each year. However, some people are worried about the treasured ruins of Machu Picchu. They are also worried about the safety of visitors. Scientists have noted the negative effects that tourists have on the ruins. Machu Picchu was never made for so many people. It was made for sandals and bare feet. Boots and hiking shoes leave scars upon the city walls. The busy road leading to Machu Picchu is also a problem. It often has mudslides. Tourists visiting the city could be hurt.
Do It!
Tourists are _________ Machu Picchu.
Press enter to interact with the item, and press tab button or down arrow until reaching the Submit button once the item is selected
A forgetting
B damaging
C repairing
D avoiding
Answers
Answer:
I hope I helps u
Explanation:
damaging
In a suit against Karen, Luke obtains an injunction. This is: Group of answer choices a departure from precedent. a payment of damages or money. the cancellation of a contract. an order to do or refrain from doing a certain act.
Answers
In the context of a suit against Karen, obtaining an injunction means that the court has granted Luke's request and issued a binding order to Karen.
The injunction may require Karen to stop engaging in a particular action or behavior (a prohibitory injunction) or to take a specific action (a mandatory injunction) to address the situation at hand. An injunction is a powerful legal tool that aims to prevent future harm or maintain the existing conditions until the court has an opportunity to fully hear and decide the case.
It is different from a payment of damages or money, which is a monetary award intended to compensate for past harm or losses. The granting of an injunction does not necessarily indicate a departure from precedent or the cancellation of a contract. Instead, it is a court-ordered remedy to address a specific legal issue and provide equitable relief to the party seeking it.
Learn more about Luke's request here
https://brainly.com/question/31933079
#SPJ11
After the Civil War, many Southern states passed laws that restricted the rights of former slaves. These laws were commonly known as
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
(sourthen) black codes
write any four advantages of living in a community
Answers
Answer:1)There are people to help you out with some problems 2)They people look out for each other.3)Companionship:people will mix with others and bond with them and make friends.4)People learn things from each other.
Explanation:
Of urban or rural, this best describes the general location of the contemporary Mexican-American population.
Answers
Of urban or rural, urban best describes the general location of the contemporary Mexican-American population.
Explanation:Mexican Americans, also known as Chicanos, are a Latino ethnic group residing in the United States, mostly in the Southwest and West. According to the 2010 census, the Mexican-American population is the largest minority group in the country, accounting for 63% of the entire Hispanic/Latino population.Therefore, urban best describes the general location of the contemporary Mexican-American population. Mexican Americans are mostly concentrated in urban areas such as Los Angeles, San Antonio, Houston, and Phoenix.
To know more about contemporary visit
https://brainly.com/question/33423941
#SPJ11
driving decisions depend on learned information, realistic perceptions and _____.
Answers
Driving decisions depend on learned information, realistic perceptions and sound judgements.
What is the decision making process in driving?Examples of driving decisions are: checking mirrors, checking gauges, slowing down, speeding up, signaling, executing a lane change, keeping the proper following distance, and proper lane positioning before a turn.
The factors that assist in driving are Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations which tell a driver what they can and cannot do. Self-interest, self-priorities, and values are other influencing factors. These aid in decision-making by letting drivers know that they risk being hurt if they break the law and traffic regulations. Priorities enable decision-making that is primarily based on what is most crucial at the moment. Finally, values have an impact on decision-making because they are firmly held convictions that cannot be compromised.
Therefore, apart from learned information, and realistic perceptions, driving decision also depend on sound judgement.
To learn more about driving, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10648228
#SPJ1
Write the role of political parties, social worker and communities in solving social problems.
Answers
Social workers- enforce laws, cps is a good example
1) Political Parties:
- Representing and voicing concerns: Political parties play a crucial role in representing the interests and concerns of different sections of society. They work to identify and understand social problems affecting the community and develop policies and initiatives to address them.
- Policy formulation and advocacy: Political parties have the power to shape public policy through legislation and advocacy. They can propose and promote policies and reforms aimed at solving social problems and improving the well-being of communities.
- Mobilizing support and resources: Political parties can mobilize public support and resources to address social problems. They can raise awareness, build coalitions, and garner public support to implement social initiatives effectively.
2) Social Workers:
- Identifying and assessing needs: Social workers play a vital role in identifying and assessing social problems within communities. They work closely with individuals and groups to understand their challenges and needs, conducting assessments to develop tailored interventions.
- Direct service provision: Social workers provide direct services to individuals and communities affected by social problems. They offer counseling, case management, advocacy, and access to resources and support systems to help people overcome challenges and improve their well-being.
- Community empowerment and mobilization: Social workers engage with communities to empower them and facilitate their active participation in solving social problems. They promote community mobilization, encourage grassroots initiatives, and facilitate collective action to address social issues effectively.
3) Communities:
- Collective action and collaboration: Communities are essential in solving social problems as they can collectively address common concerns. By coming together, community members can pool resources, knowledge, and skills to develop and implement strategies that tackle social issues effectively.
- Advocacy and awareness: Communities have the power to raise awareness about social problems and advocate for change. By speaking out, organizing campaigns, and engaging with policymakers, communities can bring attention to pressing issues and drive the necessary changes.
- Social support and resilience: Communities provide social support networks that can assist individuals and families facing social problems. By fostering a sense of belonging, offering mutual aid, and promoting resilience, communities can help individuals overcome challenges and create positive social change.
It's important to note that the roles of political parties, social workers, and communities in solving social problems are interconnected and often require collaborative efforts to achieve meaningful and sustainable solutions.
Hope this helps!
Marketing managers often use in store promotions to stimulate sales of:
A.) technical products
B.) high involvement products
C.) high priced products
D.) industrial products
E.) low involvement products
Answers
Marketing managers often use in-store promotions to stimulate sales of low involvement products (E).
Low involvement products are items that require minimal thought and decision-making by consumers, making them suitable for impulse purchases. In-store promotions, such as discounts, special offers, or eye-catching displays, can effectively attract customers' attention and encourage them to buy these products without much deliberation. This promotional strategy is less effective for technical, high involvement, high priced, or industrial products (A, B, C, D), as they usually require more extensive research and consideration by consumers before purchasing.
While promotions can also be used for high priced or technical products, these types of purchases typically involve more research and decision-making before buying, making in-store promotions less effective for these products.
To know more about Marketing Manager visit-
https://brainly.com/question/22555057
#SPJ11
Support staff in the executive office of the president include
administrators.
cabinet members.
reporters.
party leaders
Answers
Answer:
administrator
Explanation:
because they can not do nothing without the administrator support
A town has some extra money. Some citizens think that the money should be spent on a new library. Others think it should be used to build a new park. What should the citizens do to solve this problem?
A. Go to court to decide how to spend the money
B. Hold a vote to decide how to spend the money
C. ask the govemor to decide how to spend the money
D. Have state representatives decide how to spend the money
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation:Because if you have vote about how to spend the money. it would solve the problem more quicker if you have people to vote which one they would like.
While some citizens may run for political office, the primary method of participation in the political system for most citizens is which of the following selections? Select one: A. voting B. petitioning their government C. standing for election D. sitting on a jury
Answers
Answer:
Petitioning to gov
Explanation:
I have prepworks
is the transferring of some or all of the assets or operations of public systems into private hands.question 27 options: individuation privatization commoditization profiteering gouging
Answers
The transferring of some or all of the assets or operations of public systems into private hands is known as privatization.
Privatization refers to the process of transferring the ownership, control, or management of public assets or services to private entities or individuals. It involves the transition from public ownership and control to private ownership and control, often with the aim of increasing efficiency, reducing government involvement, and promoting competition in the market.
Privatization can occur in various sectors, such as transportation, healthcare, utilities, education, and more. The rationale behind privatization often includes the belief that private entities can better allocate resources, increase productivity, and deliver services more efficiently than public entities. It is believed that privatization can introduce market incentives, innovation, and competition, leading to improved service quality and cost-effectiveness.
However, the decision to privatize public systems is often a complex and contentious issue. Critics argue that privatization can lead to the loss of public control, reduced accessibility for vulnerable populations, and the prioritization of profit over public interest. The impacts of privatization can vary depending on the specific context and the manner in which it is implemented.
Learn more about privatization here :
https://brainly.com/question/30653048
#SPJ11
Independence of French colonies in Africa were relatively peaceful with the
exception of
Algeria
The Ivory Coast
Morocco
Mali
Ghana
Answers
Answer: Algeria
Explanation: In most African nations, independence came about peacefully. This was different in Algeria because a small white minority dominated the population and didn't want change. Approximately one million Europeans owned the farmland in Algeria and dominated the government, while the rest of the population(eight million Arabs) poor and powerless. In 1954, the nationalist group FLN launched a guerrilla war against the French rule. White citizens and Arabs considered in favor of the French rule were murdered, and because of this violent war the French government was overthrown.
a. Write any four benfit that you are getting from education.
Answers
Answer:
how your body work
how we live in proper manner
what is wrong and right
and service is also included
how has the nature of the presidential power changed since the radification of the U.S. constitution?
Answers
Explanation:
it has become less restricted over time.
pls help ill give 15 points
Answers
Answer:
Brazil - No Dry Season
Uruguay - Short Dry Season
Argentina - Long Dry Season
Suriname - Arid, Semi aird
brazil: long dry seasons
uruguay: arid, semi arid
argentina: no dry seasons
suriname: short dry seasons
(the arid, semi arid one applies to uruguay, brazil, and argentina, so im not quite sure about that one but it mainly applies to uruguay)
which cultural traits are commonly found among the people of brazil?
Answers
Answer:
Strong family ties and follow Roman Catholic Traditions.
Explanation:
why did the eisenhower administration embrace the doctrine of ""massive retaliation""?
Answers
The Eisenhower administration embraced the doctrine of "massive retaliation" because it believed that it would be an effective strategy to deter Soviet aggression during the Cold War.
What was the Eisenhower administration's "massive retaliation" doctrine?President Dwight D. Eisenhower developed the "massive retaliation" doctrine in the 1950s as a way to keep the Soviet Union in check. The policy's fundamental principle was that any attack on American interests or allies would result in a massive response, potentially including the use of nuclear weapons, according to the doctrine. By doing so, the United States hoped to deter Soviet aggression by threatening them with a nuclear counter-attack that would cripple the Soviet Union.
How did the massive retaliation policy affect the Cold War?The policy of "massive retaliation" had a significant impact on the Cold War, as it was a strategic plan that relied heavily on deterrence to prevent Soviet aggression. The doctrine had both pros and cons, depending on one's perspective.
Proponents of the doctrine argue that it was a successful deterrent to Soviet aggression because the threat of nuclear retaliation was enough to deter them from taking action against the United States and its allies. Others argue that the doctrine increased tensions and the possibility of a nuclear war, which would have been catastrophic.
Learn more about massive retaliation: https://brainly.com/question/3095126
#SPJ11
The Eisenhower administration embraced the doctrine of "massive retaliation" because it promised a more cost-effective defense policy than maintaining large military forces or waging small-scale wars with limited objectives.
What was the doctrine of "massive retaliation?
"The doctrine of "massive retaliation" was a military doctrine developed by the United States during the 1950s. The doctrine, also known as "mutually assured destruction," argued that the best way to prevent the Soviet Union from attacking the United States or its allies was to threaten to use nuclear weapons against the Soviet Union and its satellite states.
In other words, the United States would maintain a stockpile of nuclear weapons large enough to ensure that the Soviet Union would be destroyed if it ever tried to attack the United States or its allies. The doctrine argued that the fear of nuclear retaliation would be sufficient to deter the Soviet Union from launching an attack.
What was the reason behind the embrace of the doctrine of "massive retaliation?"
The Eisenhower administration embraced the doctrine of "massive retaliation" because it promised a more cost-effective defense policy than maintaining large military forces or waging small-scale wars with limited objectives. The doctrine was based on the idea that the threat of a nuclear attack was so great that the United States did not need to maintain large conventional forces to deter the Soviet Union. Instead, the United States could rely on its nuclear arsenal to protect itself and its allies from aggression.
Another reason why the Eisenhower administration embraced the doctrine of "massive retaliation" was that it believed that the United States could not afford to fight a large-scale war with the Soviet Union. The United States had just emerged from World War II, and it had spent a great deal of money and resources on that conflict. The Eisenhower administration believed that it was not practical to fight another large-scale war and that the United States needed to find a more cost-effective way to protect its interests.
To know more about Eisenhower administration
https://brainly.com/question/1262961
#SPJ11
Which of the following was condemned by Minister Louis Farrakhan?
a. bootstrap capitalism
b. abortion
c. strict punishment
d. self-help
Answers
Minister Louis Farrakhan condemned abortion.
Minister Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, has publicly expressed his opposition to abortion. He has stated that he believes abortion is a form of genocide that disproportionately affects African American communities. Farrakhan has been vocal about his stance on protecting the sanctity of life and advocating for alternatives to abortion.
It's important to note that while Farrakhan has expressed his views on abortion, his stance on other topics, such as bootstrap capitalism, strict punishment, and self-help, may vary and should be explored separately.
Know more about abortion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28147361
#SPJ11
Yes or no, and why? Do you think Hobbes' philosophy is true that the first people on Earth lived in anarchy and that this is the order and state of nature?
Explain whether you believe Hobbes was right or wrong. Give examples to defend your opinion. This document should be no shorter than one page.
Answers
Firstly, ethnographic and historical evidence from indigenous societies challenges Hobbes' depiction of the state of nature. Many of these societies exhibit cooperative and egalitarian norms, emphasizing communal well-being rather than perpetual war.
Secondly, evolutionary biology suggests that humans possess innate capacities for empathy, cooperation, and social bonding. These traits have played a crucial role in our species' survival and development throughout history.
Thirdly, existing stateless societies and indigenous cultures provide examples that contradict Hobbes' theory. These societies demonstrate that effective cooperation and coordination can exist without a centralized authority.
Lastly, alternative philosophical perspectives, such as Rousseau's, argue that humans are fundamentally peaceful in the state of nature and that it is the emergence of societal inequalities that lead to conflict.
In conclusion, while Hobbes' philosophy offers insights into the consequences of anarchy, it fails to accurately portray the state of nature. Ethnographic evidence, evolutionary biology, and alternative perspectives provide compelling arguments against the idea that early humans universally lived in a perpetual state of war. Acknowledging the diversity of human experiences and the potential for cooperative interactions enriches our understanding of social dynamics.
Do you think Mao’s revolution or the revolution in 1911 enacted the most change in Chinese history?
Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
Mao’s revolution
Explanation:
in 1911 Qing dynasty came to an end but
if someone besides Mao had come to power
much of the feudal & agarian system would have stayed in place
mao changed that
ended the feudal land system where many people were subordinated to the landlords
he also changed china from an agarian country to an industrial one
he helped china become a global military power by allying itself with the soviet union , entering the korean war, being one of 5 countries in the UN security council in 1971, and allying itself with the US