Can I use negatives in my script? (example: I can't ____)

Its great to hear that you're interested in doing a language exchange. Connecting with others who speak the language you want to learn is a fantastic way to improve your skills and gain cultural knowledge.

Here are some tips to help you improve your English or Russian:

Lastly, Take language classes: Enroll in language classes at your school or find a language school in your area. This will provide you with structured learning and opportunities to practice with other students.

Learn more about English  from

https://brainly.com/subject/english

#SPJ1

The sentence "I finally spoke with Vice President Richards about my ideas for improving company efficiency." contains a punctuation error and a capitalization error.

It's missing a comma after the introductory phrase "I finally spoke" and proper capitalization for the title "Vice President." The corrected sentence should be: "I finally spoke, with Vice President Richards, about my ideas for improving company efficiency." The word "vice president" should not be capitalized unless it is used as a title directly before a person's name, as in "Vice President Richards."

In this case, it is used as a common noun and should be lowercase. It is important to use correct capitalization in writing as it enhances readability and demonstrates attention to detail and grammar. Being aware of capitalization rules and checking for errors before submitting written work can help ensure professionalism and clarity in communication.

More on punctuation error: https://brainly.com/question/17227778

#SPJ11

Aristotle's five inartistic proofs include laws, witnesses, contracts, oaths, and torture. If he were alive today, he would probably revise his theory of inartistic proofs to account for changes in society and technology.

Aristotle's five inartistic proofs are the means of persuasion which are not developed by the speaker, they include laws, witnesses, contracts, oaths, and torture. Each of these proofs has the ability to change the minds of an audience, even though they are not created by the speaker. However, if Aristotle were alive today, he may have revised these proofs to account for modern technology and changes in society. Here are some possible changes to Aristotle's inartistic proofs.

1. Laws: Aristotle's definition of laws would probably still hold up today. However, in modern society, there are more laws than ever before. Additionally, laws are now easier to access than they were in Aristotle's time, thanks to the internet. This may change the way people view the legitimacy of laws, since they are more visible than they were in the past.

2. Witnesses: Witnesses are still a powerful tool for persuasion. However, social media has changed the way we view witnesses. Today, there are more opportunities for people to share their stories, and more ways for others to verify them. This means that a witness's testimony may carry more weight than it did in Aristotle's time.

3. Contracts: Contracts are still important in modern society, but they are no longer the only way to establish agreements. For example, digital signatures and online agreements are now widely accepted. This means that contracts are less tangible than they used to be, which may change the way we view their authority.

4. Oaths: Oaths are still important in many contexts, but they are less commonly used than they were in the past. Today, people may be more likely to rely on other forms of proof, such as witnesses or contracts. However, oaths still hold a certain amount of authority, especially in legal contexts.

5. Torture: Torture is no longer an acceptable means of persuasion in modern society. If Aristotle were alive today, he would likely recognize this and revise his theory of inartistic proofs to exclude torture.

For more such questions on Aristotle, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/24994054

#SPJ8

If I were Jim Barton, I would not take on this job.

Jim Barton should carefully consider several factors before making a decision. Firstly, he needs to assess whether the job aligns with his skills, expertise, and long-term career goals. It is essential to evaluate if the job will provide opportunities for growth and advancement. Additionally, Jim should assess the company's stability and reputation in the industry, ensuring that he is not stepping into a risky or unfavorable work environment.

Secondly, Jim should weigh the compensation package and benefits offered by the job. This includes considering factors such as salary, bonuses, healthcare coverage, retirement plans, and other perks. It is crucial to evaluate whether the job offers a competitive and satisfactory remuneration package.

Lastly, Jim needs to consider the work-life balance implications of the job. He should assess the expected working hours, travel requirements, and potential stress levels associated with the position. It is important for Jim to maintain a healthy work-life balance to ensure personal well-being and overall job satisfaction.

Considering these factors, if the job does not align with Jim's skills, lacks a competitive compensation package, or will negatively impact his work-life balance, it would be wise for him to decline the job offer and explore other opportunities that better suit his professional and personal needs.

Learn more about Jim Barton visit

brainly.com/question/32203229

#SPJ11

According to the question the correct text in the passage is: "Yvonne answered that he should use the Change All option."

Grammar is the process through which words are put together to make proper sentences. Nouns, adverb, verb tenses, and other elements of grammar can be found at the word level. Phrase, clause, reported speech, and other elements of grammar are included in sentences.

By utilising good language, which helps listening and reading to you simpler for others, you can make the communication process more enjoyable for yourself. When a youngster matures and learns where and how to express themselves both verbally and in writing, grammar becomes more important.

To know more about grammar visit :

https://brainly.com/question/27955837

#SPJ1

The attribution verb most commonly used by journalists is "said." Journalists often use this verb to attribute statements or quotes to a particular source.

For example, a news article might include sentences like "The spokesperson said," or "The President said," followed by the direct quotation from that individual. Using "said" as an attribution verb is a straightforward and neutral way for journalists to indicate who made a statement without adding personal interpretation or bias.

It allows readers to understand the source of the information and provides transparency in reporting. While other attribution verbs like "stated," "commented," or "claimed" are also used, "said" remains the most commonly used verb in journalistic writing.

Learn more about Verbs here -: brainly.com/question/16044849

#SPJ11

4, 3, 3, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1

not sure on question 2, but im pretty sure its correct

Answer:

Question 1: Mrs. Winters had four grandchildren.

Question 2: Mrs. Winters lived at 604 N. Locust Street.

Question 3: She had a pet cat named Tom.

Question 4: Mother did not want Jalen to have a dog.

Question 5: Kamila had a lot of time to play with Zipper on Saturday.

Question 6: Elise had a birthday in February.

Question 7: Father said they had too many dogs.

Question 8: The puppy did not go to the house.

Question 9: School was out and Kamila was going home.

Question 10: Viggo and Megan could not go shopping on Thanksgiving Day because all the stores were closed.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

I have an essay ready that i did this year its about mnemiopsis jellyfish

this is the introduction if you would like the rest of the essay let me know!

Did you know jellyfish are as big as a human or bigger and there are some that are smaller than the tip of your pinky finger? Since the 1970’s the world has had problems with jellyfish but still to this day we have an immense problem with these creatures from the deep. The mnemiopsis jellyfish are killing the fishing and power plant industry by eating all the eggs and larvae and getting themselves stuck in power plant filters. These problems affect the fisherman and the power plant workers because the jellyfish get stuck in the filters for the power plant and end up shutting down the power to which ever city the power goes to, then the power plant workers are forced to work overtime, and they must get all the jellyfish out of the filters. The solution to these problems is that students in Japan are using the mnemiopsis jellyfish to make candy so the population of these jellyfish will decrease. Another solution to these problems is that a jellyfish called Beroe eats the mnemiopsis jellyfish, this could make that the mnemiopsis jellyfish numbers to decrease. After all of this has occurred the jellyfish population will slowly but surely lower.

Answer:

Our house on Baker Street was the only home I had ever known. I could not imagine my life anywhere else, and I didn’t want to. My dad’s company had him transferred out of the state, and I was nervous about moving and having to start all over. I wasn’t sure what to expect and that thought scared me. Moving to a new neighborhood right before the beginning of sixth grade was hard, but it brought me closer to my family and pushed me to try something new.

Explanation:

This is the sample answer

Answer:

The quote that best supports the idea that Aram feels embarrassed when Ms. Chiarelli does not respond to his suggestion that they bake together is B. "Aram felt his face get hot; why did he have to blurt out his ridiculous ideas?" This line shows that Aram is feeling embarrassed about what he said, and is regretting bringing up the idea of baking with Ms. Chiarelli.

Answer:

"like" first sentence, and "like" the second sentence.

Explanation:

The word group "It was already spring the tulips were in bloom." is a fragment. A fragment is a group of words that does not make complete sense and cannot stand alone as a sentence.

In this case, "It was already spring" and "the tulips were in bloom" are both independent clauses and could each be a sentence on their own. However, they are not connected by any conjunctions or punctuation, making the statement a fragment.Example of a correct sentence: It was already spring, and the tulips were in bloom.Example of a run-on sentence: It was already spring, the tulips were in bloom, I decided to take a walk.

(This is a run-on because it includes multiple independent clauses without appropriate punctuation or conjunctions.)Example of a comma splice: It was already spring, the tulips were in bloom. (This is a comma splice because it uses a comma to join two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction or appropriate punctuation.)

To learn more about tulips, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/14405018

#SPJ11

The given word group "it was already spring the tulips were in bloom" is a fragment.

The reason being it does not contain a subject and predicate, i.e. it is an incomplete sentence.What is a fragment ? A fragment is a group of words that does not make a complete sentence, usually lacking either a subject or a predicate. A sentence must have at least one subject and one predicate that make sense by themselves.The given word group "it was already spring the tulips were in bloom" does not contain both a subject and predicate. It is only a fragment. Thus, the correct option is "fragment."Hence, the correct answer is: Fragment.

to know more about fragment visit
https://brainly.com/question/33006768
#SPJ11

Caramelization occurs when food browns, and gelatinization occurs when starch absorbs water and swells.

When sugar is cooked, a chemical reaction called caramelization takes place, which causes the sugar to disintegrate and produce new compounds with various smells and colours. This method of cooking and baking is used to provide a variety of items, such as sweets, sauces, baked goods, and more, depth of taste and colour. The precise form of caramelization can vary based on the type of sugar used and the heating circumstances, but it often produces a sweet, rich flavour that is coveted by cooks and bakers.

For such more question on gelatin:

https://brainly.com/question/5935544

#SPJ4

The source of the internal conflict acknowledged by the speaker is that she realizes that her color and gender will make achieving her goals more difficult and challenging. The correct option is E.

This question refers to "Letter Home" by Natasha Trethewey, which took place in New Orleans in 1910. In this poem, Natasha seems to be writing poetry in the form of letters to people in her house. She said the difficulties that the speaker faced were caused, among other things, by his gender and skin color. Natasha is a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer. The majority of her poetry deals with issues such as America's racial legacy and is primarily based on her own views and memories of events and paths taken in her own life.

Learn more about gender role based here: brainly.com/question/18093714

#SPJ4

Answer:According to these reviewers, the play is "a horror story for the parents of teenagers" and "all the characters act like idiots." The plot is "boring," "incredibly unrealistic," and "not a love story," Romeo is "a fickle crybaby" and Juliet is naive, too young, and "way too anxious to take her panties off."

Explanation:

Hope this helps LOL and can u plz ark me branliest I need 2 ore and one would be nice :) Plz and thank u :)

The probability that a randomly selected customer waits between 20 and 35 minutes is 0.8186 and the maximum waiting time for a customer to receive her meal if she is in the 10% of customers who receive their meals in the fastest time is 18.6 minutes.

Waiting period for a customer to receive their meal, let X.

X ~ N(25, 5²).

The likelihood that X will occur between 20 and 35 minutes is,

P(20 < X < 35) = P[(20 - μ)/σ < (X - μ)/σ < (35 - μ)/σ]

P(20 < X < 35) = P[(20 - 25)/5 < Z < (35 - 25)/5]

P(20 < X < 35) = P[(- 5)/5 < Z < 10/5]

P(20 < X < 35) = P[- 1 < Z < 2]

P(20 < X < 35) = P(Z < 2) - P(Z < -1)

P(20 < X < 35) = 0.97725 - 0.15865

P(20 < X < 35) = 0.8186

Therefore, 0.8186 is the necessary probability.

If a customer is among the 10% of customers who receive the fastest service, the maximum wait time is,

P(X < a) = 0.10

P[(X - μ)/σ < (a - 25)/5] = 0.10

P[Z < (a - 25)/5] = 0.10

Φ[(a - 25)/5] = Ф(-1.28)

(a - 25)/5 = -1.28

Multiply by 5 on both side

(a - 25) = -6.4

Add 25 on both side, we get

a = 18.6

Therefore, 18.6 minutes are needed to complete the task.

To learn more about probability link is here

brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ4

Serve as president without being elected to either the presidency or the vice presidency and presided over the worst economy are the two quotations provide sufficient and relevant evidence to support the author's claim in the paragraph. Hence, option A and B are correct.

Ford implemented his initiatives in his first year in office against opposition from a Congress that was predominately Democratic. Inflation control was his main priority. When the recession turned into the country's biggest domestic issue, he then turned to policies meant to jump-start the economy.

In addition to being the only president to date from Michigan, he was the only president to never have won election to the position of president or vice president. In the past, he presided over the Republican caucus in the House of Representatives. In 1973, he was chosen to serve as the 40th vice president.

Thus, option A and B are correct.

For more information about Ford's goal for his presidency, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/8149227

#SPJ9

The complete question is given below-

serve as president without being elected to either the presidency or the vice presidency.

presided over the worst economy

Presided after Watergate scandal

Presided during Great depression

Answer:

I think it's D, im not 100% though

Hope this helps!!!

plz mark brainliest

Explanation:

The answer might be D but check other answer just to be sure

Answer:

My reason to help others, that they may find the help they need in their lives.

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it is not ethical. The best explanation for this is the addiction, and lust people have for both. Children will grow to notice their parents consuming these products, and they will follow in their parents footsteps.

I think it isn't moral. The best clarification for this is the enslavement, and desire individuals have for both. Youngsters will develop to see their folks consuming these items, and they will continue in their folks strides.

A corporate sponsorship is a type of promoting in which an organization pays for the option to be related with an undertaking or program.

A typical layout for corporate sponsorships involves a coordinated effort between a not-for-profit association and a support partnership, in which the last option finances an undertaking or program oversaw by the previous in return for acknowledgment.

Companies might have their logos and brand names showed close by of the association undertaking the venture or program, with explicit notice that the partnership has given financing. It isn't equivalent to charity, which includes gifts to causes that serve the public great that may not yield any return marking to the benefactor.

Corporate sponsorships are an instrument used to shape brand personality and brand picture by means of expanded perceivability. While supporting a famous and socially cognizant reason might be commonly valuable to the two players, a corporate sponsorship isn't a gift; it is an agreement.

Corporate backers frequently portray their sponsorship exercises and their advantages as "doing great by accomplishing something useful.

Therefore Corporate sponsors likewise expect some estimation of the openness they got.

Learn more about Corporate here:

brainly.com/question/15036785

#SPJ2

Answer:

Following are the response to the given question:

Explanation:

In social media, websites, or app systems, domestic marketing is growing rapidly today. Such ads are paid ads, that look and function just like any other media content that view while surfing.

Interests issues arise when one's values are aroused by another. Television advertisements could in some situations represent a potential conflict of interest because some users/browsers need not distinguish the primary contents from the ad. As the ads appear quite similar to the material in their format, consumers may also be distracted while navigating.

This may cause fewer visits of the main contents and decrease the people's interest on some other platforms, and in some cases, native marketing may constitute a conflict of interest, as some users/browsers may well not distinguish between the principal material or marketing.

Answer:

property owners think beavers are pest (2)

Explanation:

i already take this quiz

Beavers are the second largest living rodents . They have stout Bodies with large heads.

There are two type of Species :-

As Beaver is a pest and its good too removed from the property , but you have to be careful while removing the Beaver as it can release a large amount of Water and Sediments which can may destroy the other Properties. The Beaver can cause lots of damage to the property so proper Pesticide should be done in the property after regular interval of time .

To Know more about Beaver, Please refer the below link :

https://brainly.com/question/17207257

The conflict in the passage is that option D. the man is unable to withstand the freezing cold temperature outside, and his dog that accompanies him is well adapted to the harsh climate.

The conflict is mainly man versus nature as the man is struggling to survive the extremely cold environment while his dog is well adjusted to the situation. The man does not understand that the temperature is dangerously low, and his lack of preparation and understanding of the severity of the cold causes him to underestimate it. The dog, on the other hand, is used to the weather, and his instincts allow him to navigate the cold safely.

The man wants to go back to the fire where it is warm, but the dog knows that it is too cold to stop moving, so it keeps going. The passage describes the conflict between the man and the dog, where the man wants to return to the fire to get warm, while the dog is aware of the severity of the cold outside. The conflict between the man and the dog is the central conflict in the story, which helps to drive the narrative forward. It also highlights the struggle that humans face when dealing with the harsh elements of nature.

In conclusion, the conflict in the passage is man versus nature, where the man is unable to cope with the freezing temperature outside, while the dog is well adjusted to the climate. Therefore the correct option is  d

Know more about climate here:

https://brainly.com/question/20458690

#SPJ8

In order to use the evidence effectively for our analysis we can rephrase the content to make it explicit.

As your thesis is something new that you creating and writing, there are fewer chances of an evidence to explicitly be present that matches your thesis exactly. However, there are more chances of you finding a piece of evidence that implicitly supports your thesis.

In such a case, you can rephrase that piece of evidence in such a manner that they go explicitly with your thesis. The better the rephrasing, the more explicit the evidence will look in your thesis.

Although a part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this question:

2) Suppose you are writing an analysis of a literary text. In the text you find a piece of evidence that could support your thesis. However, the evidence supports your thesis implicitly, not explicitly. What must you do in order to use the evidence effectively in your analysis?

Rephrase the implicit evidence so that it becomes explicit.

Search for a more explicit piece of evidence on the same point.

Make an inference to connect the evidence to your thesis.

Do research to find evidence outside your literary text.

To learn more about thesis, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2094985

#SPJ4

One poem that supports the theme "How can you change your perspective?" is "The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost

One poem that supports the theme "How can you change your perspective?" is "The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost. The poem explores the idea of choice and the impact it has on one's life, emphasizing the importance of perspective in making those choices.

The supporting evidence for this theme in "The Road Not Taken" includes the following lines:

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—

I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference."

These lines suggest that by taking a different path, the speaker has gained a new perspective on life. The phrase "less traveled by" implies that the speaker has chosen a different, more unique path than most people, which has allowed him to see things differently. The fact that this choice has "made all the difference" suggests that changing one's perspective can have a significant impact on one's life.

Overall, "The Road Not Taken" supports the theme of changing one's perspective by emphasizing the importance of choice and the impact it can have on one's life.

Learn more about The Road Not Taken at:https://brainly.com/question/7578144

#SPJ1

The above question wants to analyze your creativity and reading and writing skills through a text written by you. For that reason, I can't write the text instead, but I'll show you how to write it.

First, you should read the text where Esperanza and her family are introduced. This reading should be able to make you understand the personality of the characters, the type of language of the text, and the tone and mood of the story.

This is important because your text must maintain the same characteristics and elements as the original text. What will be presented as something new are the events you will create based on your creativity, as well as the consequences and impacts of those events.

More information about Esperanza is at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/3712502

Answer:

Because love is hard and takes time to nurture. It’s not another infatuatio, it’s the real thing something that could affect you in a good way or a bad way.

hope this helps;)

Explanation:

We can deduce here that in the given passages about Anglo-Saxon values and beliefs, we see the following:

Values and beliefs actually refer to the thing a group of people cherish, believe and strictly adhere to. Different tribes, countries, states, cultures, etc. have their own different and/or similar values and beliefs.

Values and beliefs help to show the uniqueness of the people and makes them different from others.

Learn more about values and beliefs on https://brainly.com/question/1233007

#SPJ1

The response is typically never while you're still employed. There are, however, always exceptions to the norm, so be careful to investigate if one of the ones mentioned above seems to apply to you.

A government distributes regular benefits to certain groups of people, such as the sick, the unemployed, or those without other sources of income, through the social security system. women receiving social security who did not have employment. Social security-dependent families will suffer a great deal.

Social security is the safety net that a society provides to individuals and households in order to guarantee access to healthcare and to provide financial stability, particularly in situations of old age, unemployment, disease, invalidity, work injuries, maternity, or the death of a primary earner.

A worker has the option to expand their retirement planning on top of the regular Social Security benefit.

To learn more about Social Security refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/27784476

#SPJ4

The given quote from paragraph 8 of the story, 'The Man and the Snake' develops the point of view of Dr. During by implying that Dr. Druring is secretive about his work with snakes and unwilling to allow his family to enter the Snakery.

Dr. Druring's point of view in the given quote can be explained as follows:

Ambrose Bierce, an American Civil War soldier and author, wrote the short story "The Man and the Snake."

It depicts a man who passes away from fear after being inspired by a toy snake with buttons for eyes.

It is explained in paragraph 8 that his wife and daughters, who did not have the benefit of sharing his enlightened curiosity about the works and ways of our ill-starred fellow-creatures, were with needless austerity excluded from what he called the Snakery and doomed to companionship with their own kind, though to lessen the rigors of their lot he had permitted them out of his great wealth to outdo the reptiles in the beauty of their surroundings and to shine with his wife.

To learn more about Dr Druring from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/28897090

#SPJ1