What political position was Albert Breveridge campaigning for when he wrote his speech “March of the Flag”? Why do you think his speech was so well received?
Answer:
Albert Beveridge, an enthusiastic imperialist, was campaigning for the Indiana senator seat in 1898 when he delivered The March of the Flag speech. ... The speech aimed at promoting US imperialism both as a divine and national mission that originated with Thomas Jefferson.
What was the Selective Service Act, and why was it passed?
Answer:
Selective Service Act passed on May 18, 1917, giving the U.S. president the power to draft soldiers.
The reason for the Selective Service Act, though, was that American men had not volunteered all together or certainly not in the numbers needed to raise, train, and deploy an army quickly after the United States declared war on Germany on April 6, 1917.
Explanation:
In the space below, draw and label a diagram that shows the Japanese feudal pyramid.
(Most of the Japanese were peasants. Fill in the other two layers.)
Choose all statements that are true about the French and Dutch Exploration and Settlement
Answer:
Explanation:
French settlements were initially made up of fur traders, merchants, and missionaries, so that there were fewer than 5,000 settlers by 1672. Dutch settlements were also relatively small, and only about half of their residents were Dutch, the others being a mix of ethnicities, including Germans and French Huguenots.
What's the cause and effect of Dec 19, 1872, Carnegie Imitates Bessemer Steel?
Part 3 To play “Classical, Medieval, or Renaissance?” fill in the this chart by doing the following. • • Decide in which style each artwork was created. Write the style and letter of each work in the correct row. List two or more characteristics from Section 1 that led you to your decision. Letter and style Two or three style characteristics in this piece of art
Medieval artists tended to base their depictions of religious themes more heavily on religion. On the other hand, Renaissance artists tended to draw more inspiration from realists rather than religious parts of reality. One of the fundamental contrasts between the two kinds of art is this.
A resurgence of interest in Classical culture was a feature of the Renaissance. It started in the year 1400 and lasted until 1650. The Greek and Roman writings and artwork were rediscovered, and people today have blended their antiquated concepts in novel ways.
It follows the Classical period and precedes the Modern period, making the Mediaeval period traditionally viewed as the midway period in Western civilization.
Learn more about Renaissance here:
https://brainly.com/question/17646820
#SPJ1
the question is Think of another time in history when a famous person was prosecuted (note: not Nelson Mandela). Describe why the person you thought of was put on trial. and I can't think of anything
Answer: Bill Cosby
Explanation:
Fans of Bill Cosby were shocked to learn that the comedian had been accused of sexual assault, sexual battery and sexual misconduct incidents stretching back to the 1960s — by upwards of 60 women. In 2018, he was convicted of aggravated indecent assault, but the conviction was vacated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in June 2021.
⛔️DON'T COPY AND PASTE THAT⚠️
Use that information and put that into your own words, in a doc and searched up information about his arrest. Hope this helps!
why did President Monroe issue the Monroe Doctrine? *
A) To protect Europe from Latin America
B) To support and protect the United States and Latin America's independence from European colonization
C) To expand trade with Latin America
D) To promote peace with Mexico
Which of the following products are exported by the Central African Republic?
diamonds, cotton, and coffee
lumber, coffee, and cocoa
oil, sugar, coffee, and diamonds
corn, coffee, and tea
Please hurry I am in a test
Answer:timber, diamonds, cotton, and coffee.
Explanation:i took the test
BRAINLIEST FOR THE CORRECCT ANSWERS!!!!!! How does the rule of law affect society? Check all that apply.
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes.
B. It always prevents lawmakers from abusing power.
C. It ensures the separation of powers.
D. It governs how policies are created.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.
The correct options are:
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes.
C. It ensures the separation of powers.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.
Explanation:
The rule of law refers to the idea that everyone is equal under the law and that no one is above it. It helps to promote fairness and justice in society by providing a framework for resolving disputes and holding people accountable for their actions.
Here are the options that correctly describe how the rule of law affects society:
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes. - The rule of law sets a standard for how people should behave and encourages them to follow the law to avoid consequences.
C. It ensures the separation of powers. - The rule of law helps to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful by ensuring that each branch has its responsibilities and limitations.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers. - The rule of law requires that lawmakers follow the same laws as everyone else, preventing them from abusing their power and ensuring that they are held accountable for their actions.
Option B is incorrect because the rule of law does not always prevent lawmakers from abusing their power. It helps to prevent abuse of power, but it is not foolproof.
Option D is also incorrect because the rule of law governs how laws are enforced, not how policies are created.
Hence, the answers are A, C, and E
When was mcdonalds made
answer: The first McDonald's restaurant was opened in 1940 by brothers Maurice (“Mac”) and Richard McDonald in San Bernardino, California. It originally was a drive-in that offered a wide selection of items.
EASY 5TH GRADER WORK!
Describe the sediment of the Iroquois Nation towards the British.
Answer:
here i hope this helps
Explanation:
The Iroquois Nation wants the British to leave because they are disrupting hunting and using up recourses that belong to the Native American. They think the British don't have the right to be there.
Considering the excerpt, the sentiment of the Iroquois Nation towards the British is that:
"the British are encroachers and should no longer stay on their land."
This is evident when Canassatego the Chief of Onondaga Nation of the Iroquois Confederacy claimed that they now understood the value of their land, and as such, they no longer want the cheap things the British gave them, but rather want to keep their land.He further claimed that the British are encroaching and spoiling their land activities, thus must leave their land since they have no rights.Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the sentiment of the Iroquois Nation towards the British is that the British are encroachers, and should no longer stay on their land.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/579837
Justifiable for the United State to drop the atomic bombs on Japan?
Answer:
While some argue that the use of atomic bombs was necessary to end the war quickly and save lives, others believe that it was a disproportionate and unnecessary act of violence that caused immense human suffering. The debate over the justification of the bombings continues to this day.
Explanation:
Answer:
The United States dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was not justifiable, since history has proven many times over that solving long term issues through violence will only most likely result in one of two solutions. The anger against each side lasts for at least as long as the issue was around. Or the other, it will be 'solved' for a short time, and even then will it only come back to more disagreements among the people, causing more violence, or better, just verbal debates and disagreements, although that rarely happens in large issues among nations.
When the US dropped the bombs, they were expecting a quick surrender of Japan, although it would have been better with less violence, talking it out, or even a smaller-range bomb, that wouldn't kill so much of the population and destroy so much land. The United States dropped the bomb for a personal benefit of a lower amount of American lives lost, contradicting the idea amongst most people to preserve all human life, and prevent death from occurring as much as possible. The action was personally considered an 'allegation', not legally, among many people; many others believe that it was necessary and justifiable. It would be difficult to gainsay others opinions on this matter, although you can certainly attempt to proselytize.
Partial Rebuttal for a more beneficial answer:
After dropping the first bomb, Japan had still not surrendered, enticing the United States to repeat the action. To have two bombs dropped on your own country after being warned would most likely make you want to surrender or obey the warring nation. In the end, it turned out to be a gain for the United States, and a great loss for Japan, basically the overall idea of the people of the United States.
Which of the following happened to Hindus after Muslims took over India? (mark all that are true)
Hindus were killed
Hindus were treated nicely
Hindus were kicked out of the country
Hindu land was confiscated
Answer:
Hindus were killed, Hindus were kicked out of the country, Hindu land was confiscated
Explanation:
In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that...
a. Gibbons’s federal license allowed him to operate in multiple states.
b. Ogden’s license could not operate an interstate business.
c. Ogden could not compete with Gibbons in interstate commerce.
d. Gibbons and Ogden had to work together to operate in two states.
Answer:
i think its b if im right can i get branleist?
Explanation:
Which steps are part of reading laterally? Choose three correct answers.
conducting research about an original source
returning to an original source and evaluating it with new knowledge
writing a letter to the source to ask specific questions
making an educated guess about the source’s credibility from its URL domain
considering outside perspectives on an original source
Answer: making an educated guess about the source’s credibility from its URL domain
conducting research about an original source
writing a letter to the source to ask specific questions
Explanation:
Answer:
A, B, E
Explanation:
got it right on edge :3
What is one similarity between [Ben] Carson’s (American Neurosurgeon and Politician) jobs as a neurosurgeon and as the secretary of HUD?
a:... Both jobs were about helping people.
b: ...Both jobs involved surgery.
c:... Both jobs were easy for Carson.
d: ...Both jobs were unsuccessful for Carson.
(btw is this the right subject? History? Not sure... This was on readworks btw)
Answer:
The answer here is most likely A
Explanation:
The answer cannot be B, as the secretary of HUD is not a medical doctor.
The answer is unlikely to be C, as neurosurgery is not an easy career
The answer is not D, as Carson was successful as a doctor
Therefore, the answer is A, as both are about helping people
The similarity between Ben Carson's jobs as neurosurgeon and as the secretary of HUD is that both the jobs were about helping people. Thus, option a is correct.
Who was Ben Carson?Benjamin Solomon Carson, Sr, better known as Ben Carson is an American politician and neurosurgeon who was born on September 18, 1951, in Detroit, Michigan.
He performed the first successful separation of conjoined twins who were joined at the back of the head. The 1987 procedure required a surgical team of 70 people and lasted approximately 22 hours. In order to stop seizures in people with severe epilepsy, he improved a procedure known as hemispherectomy, in which one-half of the brain is removed. Afterwards, he got involved in politics and worked for the Donald Trump administration as the secretary of housing and urban development.
Therefore, we can conclude that option a is correct.
Learn more about Ben Carson here:
https://brainly.com/question/12085196
#SPJ2
why is north korea bad
DISEASES-Research the diseases that were common among the troops during wartime. Make a brochure describing the name of the disease, causes, and symptoms. Choose at least THREE.
By now you should have noticed that trade becomes important to people as they settle down and develop more complex societies. What advantages does a society gain when it engages in trade?
How was France affected after the signing of Treaty of Paris, which ended the French and Indian War?
A. France had to withdraw to its empire in Central and South America.
B. France had to allow the British to claim and settle the Ohio Valley.
C. France lost its claim to the entire Florida territory.
D. France had lost most of its territory and power in North America.
Answer:
Explanation:
D. France had lost most of its territory and power in North America.
Using the details you developed in your short answers, you will write a complete paragraph arguing that either Genghis Khan or Kublai Khan was more influential to the Mongol Empire. Your paragraph should contain a topic sentence that states a clear position, at least three relevant supporting detail sentences, and a concluding sentence that wraps up the ideas in your paragraph.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
please tell me the right answer if im wrong but im sure im right
Which of these major Texas cities is located the furthest west?
A San Antonio
B Houston
C Dallas
D El Paso
Answer:
Answe (D) EL Paso
Explanation:
why did some people support james k polk's interest in annexing the oregon territory?
PLEASE HELP IMMEDIATELY
one or two sentences please
Answer & Explanation:
Some people supported James K. Polk's interest in annexing the Oregon Territory because they believed in the idea of "Manifest Destiny" and saw the expansion of American territory as a natural and necessary progression.
Answer:
Americans had looked westward, and in the early years of the republic the United States had expanded its borders toward and then beyond the Mississippi River. Whether through a congressional joint resolution, negotiations, purchase, or war, President Polk by the end of his term intended for the United States to stretch from coast to coast, firmly in possession of the Oregon Territory and California.
Explanation:
Back when black people was hanged what was the song called by Billie Holiday?
What were the parts of the Connecticut Compromise?
The President could veto laws.
Slaves would count as part of the population.
Congress would have two houses that both had to pass a given law.
Congress would appoint ambassadors.
Each state would have two representatives in the Senate.
The House of Representatives would have its members elected based on population.
Answer:
I think its slaves count as part of the population
Explanation:
Answer:
Slaves would count as part of the population.
Explanation:
It was easy to come up with
What was one primary goal that early French explorers had in common? Explorers wanted to spread Christianity. Explorers wanted to start colonies in North America. Explorers wanted to discover a passage to Asia.
Answer: The early French explorers wanted to locate a northwest passage around North America to India. They were still exploring the America’s
Explanation:
The one primary goal that early French explorers had in common was Explorers wanted to discover a passage to Asia. Thus the correct oiption is C.
What is a Goal?
A goal is to refer to any objective or purpose that an individual desires for. These goals represent any individual's long-term vision for success and development.
Permanent settlements were established in several areas of North America as a result of the French discovery of the New World. French navigators started looking for the Northwest Passage, a renowned waterway connecting the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
As explorers sought to find a route to Asia. Many Europeans thought the Corridor would offer a secure sea route connecting Europe and Asia with the objective of movement and transportation.
Therefore, option C is appropriate to answer.
Learn more about Goal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28017832
#SPJ2
How many years was the American Revolution fought?
hiii everyone.....
anyone is here BTS army.....
#Armyhere❤❤❤❤❤
The conflict lasted a total of seven years, with the major American victory at Yorktown, Virginia in 1781 marking the end of hostilities, although some fighting took place through the fall of 1783.
Who was Gilbert H. Grosvenor
Answer:
Gilbert Hovey Grosvenor, the father of photojournalism, was the first full-time editor of the National Geographic magazine.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
What contributed to the migration of Jews to Palestine in the early 1900s? lack of available land in Europe due to overpopulation increased anti-Semitism in Germany and throughout Europe more positive relations between Arabs and Jews increased civilian casualties during WWI
Please help and CORRECT ANSWERS PLS
Answer:
increased anti-Semitism in Germany and throughout Europe
Explanation:
I guess this is right if it is wrong I apoligize
Answer:
stated that “the Entente Powers are determined that the Arab race shall be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation in the world … So far as Palestine is concerned, we are determined that no people shall be subject to another”. 3. Six months after General Allenby’s forces had occupied Jerusalem, another declaration, referring to “areas formerly under Ottoman dominion, occupied by the Allied Forces during the present war”, announced “… the wish and desire of His Majesty’s Government that the future government of these regions should be based upon the principle of the consent of the governed, and this policy has and will continue to have support of His Majesty’s Government”. 4. A joint Anglo-French declaration (7 November 1918) was more exhaustive and specific, affecting both British and French spheres of interest (the term “Syria” still being considered to include Lebanon and Palestine): “The object aimed at by France and Great Britain in prosecuting in the East the War let loose by the ambition of Germany is the complete and definite emancipation of the [Arab] peoples and the establishment of national governments and administrations deriving their authority from the initiative and free choice of the indigenous populations. In order to carry out these intentions, France and Great Britain are at one in encouraging and assisting the establishment of the indigenous governments and administrations in Syria and Mesopotamia now liberated by the Allies, and in the territories the liberation of which they are engaged in securing, and recognizing these as soon as they are actually established.”5. The Committee on the Husain-McMahon correspondence. While these British assurances of independence to the Arabs were in unequivocal terms, the British position, since the end of the war, had been that Palestine had been excluded, an assertion contested by Palestinian and Arab leaders. During the Husain-McMahon correspondence, the British made a determined effort to exclude certain areas from the territories to achieve independence, on the grounds that “the interests of our ally, France, are involved”. Sherif Husain reluctantly agreed to suspend, but not surrender, Arab claims for independence to that area, stating that “the eminent minister should be sure that, at the first opportunity after this war is finished, we shall ask you (from what we avert our eyes today) for what we now leave to France in Beirut and its coasts”. The area in question had been described by McMahon as “portions of Syria lying to the west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo”. This would appear to correspond to the coastal areas of present-day Syria and the northern part of Lebanon (map at annex II), where French interests converge. Prima facie it does not appear to cover Palestine, a known, identifiable land with an ancient history, sacred to the three great monotheistic religions, and which, under the Ottomans, approximated to the independent sanjak of Jerusalem and the sanjaks of Acre and Balqa (map at annex III).In 1939, shortly after the Husain-McMahon papers were made public, a committee consisting of both British and Arab representatives was set up to consider this specific issue. Both sides reiterated their respective interpretations of the Husain-McMahon letters and were unable to reach an agreed view, but the British delegation conceded that the Arab
Explanation: